transversal dose mapping and bragg-curve reconstruction in ... lims2018 sito/2_3 nichelatti... · +...
TRANSCRIPT
E. Nichelatti1, M. Piccinini2, A. Ampollini2, L. Picardi2, C. Ronsivalle2,
F. Bonfigli2, M.A. Vincenti2, R.M. Montereali2
1 ENEA C.R. Casaccia, Fusion and Technologies for Nuclear Safety and Security – Via Anguillarese 301,
S. Maria di Galeria, Rome, 00123, Italy 2 ENEA C.R. Frascati, Fusion and Technologies for Nuclear Safety and Security – Via E. Fermi 45,
Frascati (RM), 00044, Italy
Transversal dose mapping
and Bragg-curve reconstruction
in proton-irradiated lithium fluoride detectors
by fluorescence microscopy
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
• Lithium fluoride and colour centres as
radiation detectors
• Proton therapy and the TOP-IMPLART
project
• Proton irradiation of lithium fluoride
• Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-
curve reconstruction
• Conclusions
2
Summary
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-curve reconstruction in proton-
irradiated lithium fluoride detectors by fluorescence microscopy
• Lithium fluoride and colour centres as
radiation detectors
• Proton therapy and the TOP-IMPLART
project
• Proton irradiation of lithium fluoride
• Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-
curve reconstruction
• Conclusions
3
Summary
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-curve reconstruction in proton-
irradiated lithium fluoride detectors by fluorescence microscopy
Lithium fluoride (LiF)
4
• Almost non-hygroscopic
• Hosts (even at RT) stable laser-active point defects:
colour centres (CCs)
• Some CCs emit in the visible and NIR under optical
excitation
• Radiation-sensitive material CC formation
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
• Crytallographic structure: fcc
• Lattice constant = 4:03 Å
• Density = 2:639 g/cm3
• Melting temperature = 870oC
• Hardness = Knoop 102 with 600 g
indenter
• Low hygroscopicity (solubility @ 18oC =
0:27 g / 100 g H2O)
• Low refractive index (~1:39) in the
visible
• Optically transparent from ~120 nm up
to ~ 6 µm
Useful for dosimetric purposes thanks to its TISSUE EQUIVALENCE
Colour centres (CCs) in lithium fluoride
5 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
F2
Irradiation of LiF (elementary particles,
ions, EUV light, X-rays, or -rays)
stable formation of primary (F) and
aggregate CCs.
Aggregate F2 and F3+ CCs (two electrons
bound to two and three close anion
vacancies, respectively)
• red (F2) and green (F3+) emission
• almost overlapping absorption bands at
~450 nm they can be simultaneously
excited with a blue optical pump.
Applications of CCs in LiF:
• dosimeters
• light emitting devices
• tunable solid-state lasers
LiF devices as radiation detectors
6 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Ionising radiation impinges on LiF-based device (either bulk or thin film)
Stable colour centres (CCs) are created and stored in the LiF crystal lattice
The optically-active F2 and F3+ CCs are excited (blue light, ~450 nm) and
their visible PL (red and green, respectively) detected in a microscope
• Sub-micron spatial resolution (objective-
limited) over a wide field of view
• Wide dynamic range
• No need of development
• Works in air and at RT
• Time-stability (~years)
• Daylight operation
Contact
µ-radiography
Metallic grids over
LiF crystal.
EUV radiation by
plasma source.
G. Baldacchini et al. 2005
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 113104
7
The fluorescence microscope
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
“In fluorescence microscopy, the sample you want to study is
itself the light source. The technique is used to study specimens,
which can be made to fluoresce. The fluorescence microscope is
based on the phenomenon that certain material emits energy
detectable as visible light when irradiated with the light of a
specific wavelength.” (Microscopes—Help Scientists Explore Hidden Worlds. The Nobel
Foundation.)
Nikon Eclipse 80i-C1
The wide-field optical microscope working in fluorescent mode
and in white-light transmission mode is equipped with two light
sources consisting of:
• Arc lamp photovoltaic mercury OSRAM 100 W for
fluorescence mode;
• Halogen lamp for white light transmission mode.
Detector Andor Neo Scmos, Front Illuminated, -40oC
cooled, 11/16bit digitalization, 100 f/sec,
5.5 Mpixels, 2560x2160 resolution, 6.5 µm
pixel size
• Lithium fluoride and colour centres as
radiation detectors
• Proton therapy and the TOP-IMPLART
project
• Proton irradiation of lithium fluoride
• Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-
curve reconstruction
• Conclusions
8
Summary
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-curve reconstruction in proton-
irradiated lithium fluoride detectors by fluorescence microscopy
Proton therapy
9
Doctors can better aim proton beams onto a tumor, so there
is less damage to the surrounding healthy tissue. This
allows doctors to use a higher dose of radiation with proton
therapy than they can use with X-rays.
Proton therapy is used to treat cancers that have not
spread. Because it causes less damage to healthy tissue,
proton therapy is often used for cancers that are very close
to critical parts of the body.
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Proton therapy: particle therapy that uses a beam of protons to irradiate diseased
tissue, most often in the treatment of cancer.
Chief advantage (w.r.t. other techniques, e.g. X-rays): the dose is deposited over a
narrow range and there is minimal exit dose.
Treatable tumours
• Brain
• Eye
• Head and neck
• Lung
• Spine
• Prostate
• Lymph system cancer
Hindrance to universal use of protons: size and cost of the cyclotron or synchrotron
equipment.
Development of comparatively small accelerator systems is being pursued, e.g.
linear particle accelerators.
Proton therapy: dose distribution
Deposit the therapeutic dose within the volume being treated while
preserving neighbouring tissues
10 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
X-rays protons
The TOP-IMPLART project
11 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Oncological Therapy with Protons – Intensity Modulated
Proton Linear Accelerator for RadioTherapy
A high frequency linac has been developed for
the project TOP-IMPLART, with most of the
technology derived from conventional
radiotherapy equipments to make a compact
machine with reasonable costs.
Project partners:
ENEA (Italian National Agency for New
Technologies, Energy and Sustainable
Economic Development), ISS (National
Institute of Health), IFO (Istituti
Fisioterapici Ospedalieri, Roma).
The IMPLART segment (150 MeV
proton beam) up to the first treatment
room (Head and neck and paediatrics
tumours) is under construction and
installation at ENEA-Frascati, chosen as
test site for its validation before its
transfer to IRE-IFO-Rome hospital, that
will be the clinical user.
The program is funded by Regione Lazio
with a grant of 11 M€ only for high
technology systems.
Current status of the accelerator
12 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Output energy: 35 MeV
Pulse duration: 1-4 µs
Output charge/pulse: up to 60 pC
Particles/pulse: up to 4×108
Repetition Frequency: 20(typical)-50(max) Hz
Spot area (at linac exit): 0.2 cm2
• The accelerator is based on a 7 MeV injector (RF frequency 425 MHz)
followed by a vertical and an horizontal beam transport line matching the
beam to the following accelerating modules (RF frequency 2997.92 MHz).
• The segment up to 35 MeV is in operation at ENEA-Frascati. It consists of
4 SCDTL (Side coupled Drift Tube Linac) accelerating modules powered by
a single 10 MW klystron.
• The beam is used for dosimetry and radiobiology experiments devoted to
pre-clinical tests and assessment. Uniform irradiation of targets with an
area of 2-3 cm2 is obtained by spreading the beam in air at a distance of 1-
2 m from the linac exit.
• Lithium fluoride and colour centres as
radiation detectors
• Proton therapy and the TOP-IMPLART
project
• Proton irradiation of lithium fluoride
• Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-
curve reconstruction
• Conclusions
13
Summary
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-curve reconstruction in proton-
irradiated lithium fluoride detectors by fluorescence microscopy
Proton irradiation of LiF
14 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Convenience of lithium fluoride for detecting ionising radiation
The effective atomic number of LiF is close to that of soft tissue (tissue or water equivalence)
simplified calibration in clinical dosimetry
LiF response to dose (PL intensity from F2 and F3+ CCs) has been demonstrated to be
• linear with dose over several orders of magnitude (up to ~105-106 Gy)
• independent of proton energy (tested so far from 3 MeV to a few dozens of MeV)
• independent of type of radiation type (protons vs. -rays) at clinical doses
PL intensity I vs. dose D
Saturates above a certain dose value
M. Piccinini et al. 2017 EPL 117 37004
proportional to total
number of excited CCs
Dose = fluence * LET / material density
Dose: deposited energy per unit mass. PL intensity vs. dose
Ion penetration in matter: Bragg curve and peak
15 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Energetic ions deposit their energy
into matter. The amount of deposited
energy per unit depth (LET, Linear
Energy Transfer) follows a depth
distribution known as Bragg curve. In
LiF, the deposited energy contributes
in creating colour centres (CCs),
some of which emit visible light if
subsequently illuminated with a blue
optical pump.
visualisation of deposited
energy
The Bragg peak is the LET maximum, found at the end of the Bragg curve.
Ion penetration in matter: Bragg curve and peak
16 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
The Bragg peak is the LET maximum, found at the end of the Bragg curve.
• The depth of the Bragg peak increases superlinearly with energy.
Ion penetration in matter: Bragg curve and peak
17 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
The Bragg peak is the LET maximum, found at the end of the Bragg curve.
• The depth of the Bragg peak increases superlinearly with energy.
• The LET at the surface decreases with energy in a logistic way.
Ion penetration in matter: Bragg curve and peak
18 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
The Bragg peak is the LET maximum, found at the end of the Bragg curve.
• The depth of the Bragg peak increases superlinearly with energy.
• The LET at the surface decreases with energy in a logistic way.
• The LET at the Bragg peak decreases with energy in a logistic way.
Proton irradiation of LiF
19 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Summing up: what makes LiF-based devices good as proton detectors?
• LiF has good tissue equivalence (effective atomic number of 8.3 is close to
that of water or soft tissue).
• The PL intensity from CCs created by proton irradiation is linear vs. dose up to
~ 105-106 Gy. Saturation beyond that threshold value is dealt with by using a
simple model
• Possibility of visualising and analysing PL distributions corresponding to dose
distributions within LiF allows for
o advanced proton beam diagnostics (mean energy and energy spread of
protons)
o detector material characterisation (linearity range and saturation dose)
• Lithium fluoride and colour centres as
radiation detectors
• Proton therapy and the TOP-IMPLART
project
• Proton irradiation of lithium fluoride
• Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-
curve reconstruction
• Conclusions
20
Summary
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-curve reconstruction in proton-
irradiated lithium fluoride detectors by fluorescence microscopy
Proton-beam 2D dose mapping
21 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
IRRADIATION
The LiF device is irradiated by
the proton beam, which
impinges perpendicularly to one
of its faces. Its effect is to create
a distribution of colour centres in
the material.
PL-INTENSITY RECORDING
The latent PL-intensity 2D map
due to the created colour
centres is detected with a
fluorescence microscope and
digitally stored in an image file.
DOSE-MAP RECONSTRUCTION
The PL digital image is analysed
and numerically inverted to obtain
the absorbed dose map in the LiF
device. During the inversion
process, the nonlinear
dependence of PL intensity at
high doses is taken into account.
3 MeV protons, LiF film
M. Piccinini et al., EPL 117 (2017) 37004
1 mm
1 2 3
Proton beams and LiF: 2D maps properties
22 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Noteworthy properties
• Because the PL intensity linearly depends on the dose up to a certain
dose value (~105-106 Gy), for low enough beam fluence the 2D PL map
I(x,y) is a direct representation of the dose map D(x,y). (same D vs. I proportionality factor at each point)
• In case of higher fluences, for which saturation of CC concentration
occurs, the 2D PL map is a distorted replica of the dose map. A
numerical inversion process is needed to obtain D(x,y) from I(x,y).
Bragg curve analysis
23 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
IRRADIATION
The LiF crystal is irradiated by
the proton beam, which
impinges on one of its side
faces. Its effect is to create a
distribution of colour centres in
the material.
PL-INTENSITY RECORDING
Strips are cut out from the latent
PL-intensity map detected with a
fluorescence microscope. They
are 1D intensity distributions,
which are digitally stored into
data files.
BRAGG-CURVE
RECONSTRUCTION (1st TIME!)
The 1D data files are analysed
and best fitted starting from SRIM
simulations. During the inversion
process, the nonlinear
dependence of PL intensity at
high doses is taken into account.
E. Nichelatti et al., EPL 120 (2017) 56003
1 2 3
air
250 µm
7 MeV protons, LiF crystal
Bragg
peak
A
B
C
C
Bragg curve best fit
24 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Best fits of the experimental PL intensity curves along z
were performed in Matlab using a least square method
and input LET files obtained from SRIM simulations.
Fit parameters:
• Mean proton energy
• Proton energy spread (std. dev.)
• Input-to-saturation dose ratio
Note: for low enough fluences, the PL intensity curve is a direct representation
of the underlying Bragg curve (no saturation is involved). A simpler linear model
(involving only and ) is utilised.
proton beam
diagnostics }
Bragg curve fit: mean energy
25 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
The mean energy
acts on the depth of the
Bragg peak
Bragg curve fit: energy spread (std. dev.)
26 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
The energy spread
acts on the depth, width
and height of the Bragg
peak
Bragg curve fit: input dose / saturation dose
27 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
The input dose value
(as compared to the
saturation dose )
acts on the more or
less flat shape of the
PL intensity curve
dose D(z) is evaluated from SRIM simulations
Model
Bragg-curve fit: 7 MeV results
28 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
FIT PARAMETERS ADVANCED PROTON BEAM DIAGNOSTICS
KNOWN PARAMETERS (from experimental beam data)
DERIVED PARAMETERS LiF SATURATION (LINEARITY RANGE)
RESULTS FOR NOMINAL 7 MeV PROTONS (E. Nichelatti et al., EPL 120 (2017) 56003)
input-face dose proton fluence
mean energy energy std. dev.
input/saturation dose ratio
saturation dose dose @ Bragg peak (= max dose)
C
• Lithium fluoride and colour centres as
radiation detectors
• Proton therapy and the TOP-IMPLART
project
• Proton irradiation of lithium fluoride
• Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-
curve reconstruction
• Conclusions
29
Summary
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Transversal dose mapping and Bragg-curve reconstruction in proton-
irradiated lithium fluoride detectors by fluorescence microscopy
Conclusions
30 LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Enrico Nichelatti
ENEA – FSN-TECFIS-MNF
LIMS 2018 – ENEA C.R. Frascati, May 17-18, 2018
Thank you for your attention!