treating rheumatologic disease in arizona: good news, bad news · treating rheumatologic disease in...

24
Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor of Medicine Chief, Section of Rheumatology University of Arizona School of Medicine

Upload: others

Post on 22-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News

Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor of Medicine

Chief, Section of Rheumatology University of Arizona School of Medicine

Page 2: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Geographic distribution of Coccidioidomycosis

Page 3: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

3

Longitudinal Course of RA

Reproduced with permission from McInnes IB, et al. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(6):429-442.

CCP, cyclic citrullinated peptide; CTLA4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4; GP39, cartilage glycoprotein 39; PADI4, peptidyl arginine deiminase, type IV; PTPN22, protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 22.

3

Page 4: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

4

RA Joints Commonly Involved

Page 5: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

5

Early RA: Radiographic Findings

High-Detail X-Ray Low-Field MRI

Courtesy of Charles Peterfy, MD.

Page 6: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Adapted with permission from: Choy EHS, Panayi GS. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:907-916. © 2001 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

Disease Progression

Capillary Formation

Hyperplastic Synovial Membrane

Hypertrophic Synoviocyte

Neutrophils

T Cells B Cells

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Established Rheumatoid Arthritis

Synovial Villi

Extensive Angiogenesis

Plasma Cell

Pannus Eroded Bone

Neutrophils

Capsule

Bone

Synovial Membrane

Synoviocytes

Normal Joint

Cartilage

Page 7: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor
Page 8: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor
Page 9: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Adverse Effects of Nonbiologic DMARD Therapy

• Corticosteroids – Osteoporosis – Cataracts – Diabetes – HTN

• SSZ – GI – Rash – Cytopenias (G6PD

deficiency)

• MTX – Liver – Mucositis/ulcers – Headache – Alopecia – Nausea – Pulmonary – Infections

• Hydroxychloroquine – Retinopathy

(extremely rare) – Rash – Cytopenias (G6PD

deficiency) • Leflunomide

– Alopecia – Teratogen – Diarrhea – Liver – Infections

HTN = hypertension; GI = gastrointestinal.

Page 10: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Role of TNF-α in AS

Reprinted with Permission from Braun J. et al, Arthritis and Rheumatism 1995;38:499-505.

TNF-α mRNA in Sacroiliac Biopsy

29

Page 11: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Molecular Structure of Biologic Agents

Chimeric anti-TNF mAb TNF-receptor p75 IgG1 construct

Fully human anti-TNF mAb PEGylated humanized

anti-TNF Fab-fragment TNF-receptor p55 PEG

Description Structure

Human Mouse Synthetic element Polyethylene glycol

Page 12: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Soluble Receptors Bind, Neutralize Soluble not Membrane-bound TNF-α,-β

Soluble TNF-β

Soluble TNF-α

Receptor-bound TNF-α

Soluble receptor construct

Enbrel prescribing information.

Page 13: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Monoclonal Antibodies Bind and Neutralize Soluble and Membrane-Bound

TNF-α

Page 14: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

14

Joint Inflammation and Destruction in RA

Reproduced with permission from Klareskog L, Catrina AI, Paget S. Lancet. 2009;373(9664):659-672. 14

Page 15: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

15 Adapted with permission from Klareskog L, Catrina AI, Paget S. Lancet. 2009;373(9664):659-672.

MOA of Biologic DMARDs in RA

Adalimumab Certolizumab Etanercept Golimumab Infliximab

Golimumab

Adalimumab Certolizumab

Etanercept Golimumab

Infliximab

Page 16: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor
Page 17: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Rituximab in RA: Anti-CD20 mAb

• Genetically engineered chimeric mAb

• Variable light- and heavy-chain regions from murine anti-CD20 Ab

• Human IgGk constant regions

• B-cell lineage antigen; not expressed on stem cells, early pre-B cells, dendritic cells or plasma cells

• Rapid B-cell depletion without inducing hypogamma-globulinemia

Modified from Roche slide kit

Page 18: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Tocilizumab binds to both the mIL-6R and the sIL-6R, preventing binding of IL-6 and association with the gp130β chain and thus IL-6–mediated signaling.

Signal Transduction Inhibited

Cell membrane

IL-6

X

X mIL-6R

sIL-6R

X gp130 gp130

Tocilizumab: Humanized Anti–IL-6R Monoclonal Antibody

mIL-6R = membrane-bound IL-6 receptor; sIL-6R = soluble IL-6 receptor.

Mihara M Int Immunopharmacol 2005;5(12):1731-1740; Maini RN et

Page 19: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Please see full prescribing information. 06E-64B-P497-1 19

ACR Responses at Years 1 and 2 Prespecified Comparison HUMIRA + MTX vs MTX Alone

Patients who withdrew or had missing values were considered nonresponders ξ P <0.001 for HUMIRA + MTX vs HUMIRA alone and P =0.022 vs MTX alone * P <0.001 vs HUMIRA alone and P =0.002 vs MTX alone † P =0.043 vs HUMIRA alone; # P<0.001 vs HUMIRA alone and vs MTX alone

PREMIER

ACR20 ACR70

HUMIRA

+ MTX HUMIRA MTX

46 47

26 28 28 28

* *

HUMIRA + MTX

HUMIRA MTX

ACR50

Week 52

Week 104

HUMIRA

+ MTX HUMIRA MTX

62 59

42 37

46 43

# #

Per

cent

age

of P

atie

nts

0

20

40

60

80 73 69

54 49

63 56

ξ *

Adapted from Breedveld FC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):26-37

Page 20: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Please see full prescribing information. 06E-64B-P497-1 20

No Radiographic Progression

Patients with Δ TSS ≤0.5 at Weeks 52 and 104 Prespecified Comparison HUMIRA + MTX vs MTX Alone

Week 52 Week 104

PREMIER

* *

64

51

37

61

45 34

0

20

40

60

80

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pat

ient

s

HUMIRA + MTX (n=268)

HUMIRA

(n=274) MTX

(n=257) *P<0.01 for HUMIRA + MTX vs HUMIRA alone and MTX alone. †P<0.01 for HUMIRA alone vs MTX alone

Adapted from Breedveld FC, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):26-37

•Approximately twice as many patients experienced no radiographic progression on HUMIRA + MTX vs MTX monotherapy at 2 years

Page 21: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Please see full prescribing information. 06E-64B-P497-1 21

Rates of Selected Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in HUMIRA Long-Standing Moderate to

Severe RA Clinical Trials

Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Long-Standing RA Trials as of

August 31, 2002 N=2468

4870 PY (E/100 PY)

Long-Standing RA Trials as of

April 15, 2005 N=10,050

12,506 PY (E/100 PY)

Serious infections 4.90 5.10 Tuberculosis (TB) 0.27 0.27 Histoplasmosis 0.06 0.03 Demyelinating diseases 0.08 0.08 Lymphoma 0.21 0.12

SLE/Lupus-like syndrome 0.08 0.10 Congestive heart failure 0.29 0.28

Schiff MH, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:889-894

Data from long-standing trials with HUMIRA, including open-label extensions and ACT and ReACT early access programs. Values are presented as events per 100 PY.

Page 22: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Please see full prescribing information. 06E-64B-P497-1 22

1.3

0.33*

0.08†

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Europe Europe North America

Screening and TB Rates in HUMIRA RA Clinical Trials

7 534

# Cases Exposure (PY)

4 4914†

23 7058*

No Screening

Data from long-standing RA trials with HUMIRA, including open-label extensions and ACT and ReAct early access programs. *DE018 + ReAct †DE019 + DE020 + ACT

Eve

nts

per 1

00 P

Y

Patients receiving HUMIRA should be monitored for signs and symptoms of active tuberculosis (TB), including patients who are TB skin test negative. Active TB has developed in patients receiving HUMIRA whose screening for latent TB infection was negative. Schiff MH, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:889-894

Screening Implemented

Patients Screened

Page 23: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Please see full prescribing information. 06E-64B-P497-1 23

Eve

nts

per 1

00 P

Ys

Rate reported in the literature in RA population

4.9 5.1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Serious Infection Rates in adalimumab RA Clinical Trials*

• The total infection rate (serious and nonserious) in placebo-controlled RA trials was 1 per patient year with HUMIRA vs 0.9 per patient year with placebo • RA population serious infection rates range from 3.1 to 9.6 per 100 PY Data from HUMIRA pivotal trials and open-label extension studies. Range of serious infections in RA population based on rates reported in literature for RA population. One study investigating the relationship between serious infections and immunosuppressive use in RA patients reported an overall rate of 3.1 events per 100 patient years. Another population-based study reported a rate of infections requiring hospitalization of 9.57 events per 100 patient years. *The incidence of serious infections was 0.04 per patient year in HUMIRA-treated patients and 0.02 per patient year in placebo-treated patients.

Schiff MH, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:889-894 Singh G, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:S242 Doran MF, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2287-2293 HUMIRA full prescribing information

Through August 2002

Exposure: 4,870 PYs

Through 15 April 2005

Exposure: 12,506 PYs

Page 24: Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News · Treating Rheumatologic Disease in Arizona: Good News, Bad News Jeffrey R. Lisse, M.D. Ethel P. McChesney Bilby Professor

Thank you