trieschmann, hoyt & sommer property and liabilities loss exposures chapter 3 ©2005,...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer
Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures
Chapter 3
©2005, Thomson/South-Western
![Page 2: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
22
Chapter Objectives
• Identify the kinds of property subject to loss and the types of losses that may occur
• Define the basic payments made under liability insurance contracts
• Distinguish between criminal law and civil law• Understand what a tort is• Describe negligence and the characteristics of a
negligent act• Explain some of the defenses against a claim of
negligence• Discuss factors that are causing individuals and
businesses to maintain higher standards of care• Identify the basic types of liability exposure and give an
explanation of each
![Page 3: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
33
Property Loss Exposures
• Real property – Land, all structures permanently attached to
the land, and whatever is growing on the land – Examples include buildings, attachments to
buildings, crops
• Personal property – All property other than real property
• Examples include cars, money, clothes, furniture, textbooks, airplanes, animals
![Page 4: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
44
Property Loss Exposures
• Direct loss – Occurs when there is damage to property
• Indirect loss – Occurs when a direct loss causes expenses to
increase or revenues to decline
• Many insurance contracts insure both direct and indirect losses in the same contract
• When dealing with property insurance, there are usually only two parties to the contract – The insured and the insurer
![Page 5: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
55
Property Loss Exposures
• Not all types of property are insurable – Coverage cannot be purchased for loss of
goodwill or loss of a copyright – Raw land is difficult to insure
• Sex and property loss exposures – For insurance purposes, animals are
considered property – Firms must be able to manage loss to or from
the animals and learn to manage the animals during the mating season
![Page 6: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
66
Liability Exposures
• One of the most serious financial risks that risk managers must deal with – Loss through legal liability for harm caused to others
• Insurance for liability losses is more complex than property insurance – Because people other than the insured and the
insurer are involved
• Liability is usually determined by proving negligence
![Page 7: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
77
Types of Liability Damages
• Insurance contracts are designed to pay only for certain types of losses – Usually restricted to pay for
• Bodily injury • Property damage• Personal Injury• Legal expenses
![Page 8: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
88
Types of Liability Damages
• Bodily injury – Includes liability for losses a person may incur
because his or her body or mind has been harmed • Includes payments for medical bills, loss of income,
rehabilitation costs, loss of services, pain and suffering damages, punitive damages
• Property damage – Loss may be due to a loss from actual damage to the
property, as well as loss of use of the property • Personal injury
– Result from libel, slander, invasion of privacy, false arrest, etc.
• Legal expenses
![Page 9: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
99
Criminal and Civil Law
• Criminal law – Directed toward wrongs against society
• Examples include murder, robbery, rape, assault with a deadly weapon
• Civil law – Directed toward wrongs against individuals
and organizations • Examples include breach of contract and negligent
acts
![Page 10: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1010
Torts
• Legal injury or wrong to another that arises that of actions other than breach of contract – Courts will provide a remedy by allowing
recovery in an action for damages
• Legal injury – Results when a person’s rights are wrongfully
invaded • Right of personal privacy, right to enjoy one’s
property and right to be free from personal injury
![Page 11: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
1111
Basic Law of Negligence
• The negligent act – Negligence is the failure to exercise the degree of
care required by law • Conduct that a reasonably prudent individual would exercise
to prevent harm
• A negative act – Failure to do something
• Negligence maybe the failure to act when there is a duty to act
• A positive act – The doing of something
![Page 12: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
1212
Basic Law of Negligence
• A voluntary act – One that is done voluntarily
• An involuntary act is excusable– A negligent act is not excused because there is no intention to
harm • An imputed act
– One is liable not only for one’s own actions but also for the negligent acts of service or agents acting in the course of their employment or agency
• Employers may be sued because of negligence acts of their employees
– Vicarious liability
• Proximate cause of the loss– There must be an unbroken chain of events leading from the
negligent act to the damage sustained
![Page 13: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1313
Defenses Against Negligence Claims • Contributory negligence
– If both parties are to blame in a given accident – May not collect against the other, even if the defendant was 90
percent to blame and the plaintive only 10 percent to blame
• Assumed risk – Defendant may raise the defense that the plaintiff has no cause
for action because the plaintiff assumed the risk of harm from • The conduct of the defendant • The condition of the premises • The defendant’s product
• Guest-host statutes – Relate to the standard of care by an automobile driver to a
passenger
![Page 14: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1414
Factors Leading to Higher Standards of Care • Expanding application of liability
– Courts tend increasingly to impose liability in new factual settings
• Weakening of defenses against a liability – Most states have enacted a statute that replaces the defense
of contributory negligence with comparative negligence • The liability of the defendant is reduced by the extent to which the
plaintiff was contributively negligent
– Last clear chance rule • A plaintive who was contributively negligent may still have a cause of
action against the defendant – If it can be shown that the defendant had a last clear chance before the
accident to avoid injuring the plaintiff but failed to do so
![Page 15: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1515
Factors Leading to Higher Standards of Care• Res Ipsa Loquitur
– “The thing speaks for itself” – Plaintiff may sometimes collect without actually proving
negligence on the part of the defendant
• Expansion of imputed liability – Joint and several liability
• When an accident occurs and several different parties are negligent – The plaintiff may sue and collect from one or more of the negligent
parties
– Superfund legislation • Created by the Federal government to help fund the cleanup cost of
major pollution sites – Estimated that more than 80 percent of the funds spent on the
Superfund enforcement is for overhead (legal fees, etc.) and less than 20 percent for cleaning up the environment
![Page 16: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1616
Factors Leading to Higher Standards of Care• Changing concepts of damage
– More liberal interpretation of what types of damages may be allowed in negligence actions
• Damages have been awarded for such things as mental anguish
– Every state allows punitive damages except Massachusetts, Nebraska and Washington
• Awards used to punish defendants because their actions constituted gross negligence or willful and wanton misconduct
![Page 17: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
1717
Factors Leading to Higher Standards of Care• Increased damage awards
– The effect of inflation in reducing the purchasing power of the dollar has undoubtedly contributed to the increased amounts of damage awards
– Perhaps the existence of liability insurance has caused juries to be more generous
• Than they would be if they knew the plaintiff would pay the damages personally
– The insurance industry is supporting various types of tort reform, including
• Imposing restrictions on the right to sue • Abolishing punitive damages in civil suits • Reducing the standard of care to the standard existing at the time
the product was made instead of at the time the loss occurred • Placing a ceiling on non-economic damages • Repealing the collateral source rule
![Page 18: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
1818
Table 3-1: Liability Claims
![Page 19: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
1919
Types of Liability Exposures
• Contractual liability – One’s liability maybe imputed to another by contract
• For example, a city may require that its street paving contractor hold the city harmless for all negligence arising out of the operations of the contractor
• Employer-employee liability – Employers are still subject to the law of negligence with respect
to employment not covered by workers’ compensation laws • Duties owed to employees
– Must provide a safe place to work – Must employ individuals reasonably competent to carry out their tasks – Must warn of danger – Must furnish appropriate and safe tools – Must setup and enforce proper rules of conduct of employees as they
relate to safe working procedures
![Page 20: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2020
Types of Liability Exposures
• Property owner–tenant liability– The tenant or owner owes a certain degree of care to those who
enter the premises • Invitees
– Individuals who are invited on the premises for their own benefit as well as for that of the landlord or tenant
• Licensees – Those who are on the premises for legitimate purpose with the
permission of the occupier» Include meter readers, milk delivery drivers, police officers
• Trespassers – All those other then invitees and licensees who enter on the premises
» No care is owed to a trespasser but an owner cannot set a trap for or deliberately injure a trespasser
• Current trend is to abolish the classifications and to hold the occupier of the land liable under most circumstances for failure to exercise due care
![Page 21: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2121
Types of Liability Exposures
• Assumption of liability by attendant – When an individual leases a building, the question
arises as to what extent the landlord is responsible for injuries to tenants
• Generally, the tenant takes on whatever duty the landlord owes to members of the public
• Attractive nuisance doctrine– Liability of the occupier of land may be changed so
that a trespassing child is considered, in many jurisdictions, to be an invitee
![Page 22: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2222
Consumption or Use of Products
• A manufacturer, wholesaler, or retailer is required to exercise reasonable care and to maintain certain standards in the handling and selection of the goods in which it deals – If injury to person or property results from the
use of a faulty product there may be grounds for legal action
![Page 23: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
2323
Consumption or Use of Products
• Breach of warranty – A warranty maybe expressed or implied – Breach of this written contract may give rise to a court action – Under the Uniform Commercial Code the seller is held to have
made certain unwritten or implied warranties • Seller warrants that the goods are reasonably fit for their intended
purpose • Seller warrants that that when the goods are bought by description
instead of by actual inspection the goods are saleable in the hands of the buyer
• Strict tort – The manufacturer or distributor of a defective product is liable to
a person who is injured by the product • Regardless of whether the person injured is a purchaser, a
consumer, or a third person such as a bystander
![Page 24: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
2424
Consumption or Use of Products
• Negligence – If the defendant was negligent in the preparation or
manufacture of the product – Or failed to provide adequate instructions or warning
• A person injured may be entitled to sue for damages
– During the past several years the product liability area has been very explosive
• Courts have continued to expand manufacturers’ liability
![Page 25: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2525
Completed Operations of a Contractor • The damage must occur after the
contractor has completed the work
• The work has been accepted by the owner or abandoned by the contractor
![Page 26: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2626
Professional Acts • The seller of services is required to use reasonable care not to
injure others in the performance of those services – Examples include physicians , accountants, architects, insurance
agents, lawyers, pharmacists, beauticians • The standard of care required of professional people is broadly
interpreted – These individuals must possess the skill, judgment, and knowledge
appropriate to their calling – Must conduct themselves according to recognized professional
standards • Standards vary from profession to profession and are constantly changing
as each particular field develops • Use of res ipsa loquitur in medical malpractice cases appears to
have had the effect of turning doctors into insurers – May result in doctors being unwilling to try new procedures and
treatments for fear of financial bankruptcy if the treatments should fail
![Page 27: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
2727
Principled-Agent Liability
• Under the doctrine of respondeat superior – A master is liable for the acts of servants if the service or agents
are acting within the scope of their employment • An employee imposes liability on the employer for negligent harm to
a third party – Even if the employee is acting contrary to instructions as long as he or
she is doing the job
• A distinction is made between acting as an agent or a servant and acting as an independent contractor – The employer is not held liable for the carelessness of an
independent contractor to as great a degree as for the carelessness of an agent or a servant
• However, exceptions to this exist
![Page 28: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2828
Ownership and Operation of Automobiles • Under common law, an automobile owner or
operator is required to exercise reasonable care in the handling of automobiles
• Important areas of negligence – Liability of the operator – Liability of the owner for the negligence of others
operating the car – Liability of employers for the negligence of their
servants or agents using automobiles in their employer’s business
• Even when the employer is not the owner
![Page 29: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2929
Ownership and Operation of Automobiles• Liability of the operator
– Typical damage suit in the field of automobile liability – Impossible to lay down a comprehensive statement of what constitutes
negligence in the operation of an automobile • Liability of the owner-nonoperator
– The courts have generally agreed that the automobile is not a dangerous instrumentality in itself
• One is justified in assuming that the borrower of an automobile is competent to handle it unless there is obvious evidence of incapacity or known recklessness
– However, in many states, vicarious liability laws have the effect of making the parent of a minor child liable for damage done by negligent operation of the car by a minor
– Family-purpose doctrine • An automobile is looked upon as an instrument to carry out the common
purposes of the family – The owner ought to be responsible for its use when any family member uses it
because this member is the agent of the family head and is carrying out a family function
![Page 30: Trieschmann, Hoyt & Sommer Property and Liabilities Loss Exposures Chapter 3 ©2005, Thomson/South-Western](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032803/56649e215503460f94b0d8f7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
3030
Ownership and Operation of Automobiles• Liability of employers
– Even those who do not own automobiles may be liable for damages through their negligent operation
• If by some legal construction the nonowner can be shown to be responsible
– The legal construction normally employed is respondeat superior