Upload File

two phase beggs brill

4
Two Phase Flow - Beggs & Brill Method Line Number P-10001 Chemical Engineering Calculations Description Feed Pipe Date 11-May-15 User Input By CheCalc Pipe Data Metric English Inner Diameter 50.67 mm 1.995 inch Pipe Roughness 0.00180 mm 0.000071 foot Pipe Length 100.00 m 328.084 foot Flow Direction uphill Pipe Inclination angle 90 ° with horizontal Gas Flowing Temperature 32.2 Deg C 90.00 Deg F Inlet Pressure 119 bar 1719.7 psi Volumetric flowrate 9.0 5.31 @ Standard Conditions 944.9 587.6 Density 141.3 8.823 Viscosity 0.020 cP 1.34E-05 lb/ft.s Liquid Volumetric flowrate 4.75 20.916 US gpm Density 613.8 38.320 Viscosity 0.500 cP 3.36E-04 lb/ft.s gas/liquid Surface tension 28.0 dyne/cm Results Flow pattern map Intermittent Pressure drop due to head 0.462 0.462 1.055 1.055 0.487 0.487 Mixture density 371.61 23.20 DP due to Head 3.64 bar 52.85 psi Pressure drop due to friction Friction factor ratio 1.445 1.445 No Slip Reynold's Number 157713 157713 0.0042 Fanning 0.0042 Fanning 0.0060 Fanning 0.0060 Fanning DP due to friction 0.26 bar 3.77 psi Total pressure drop 3.90 bar 56.62 psi Correction due to acceleration 0.989 0.989 Corrected Total Pressure drop 3.95 bar 57.23 psi CheCalc.com m 3 /h ft 3 /min Nm 3 /h @ 1 atm, 0°C SCFM @ 14.7 Kg/m 3 lb/ft 3 m 3 /h Kg/m 3 lb/ft 3 Holdup volume fraction, EL(0) Inclination correction factor, β Inclined holdup v.f, EL(θ) Kg/m 3 lb/ft 3 No Slip friction factor, fNS Two phase firction factor, fTP

Upload: chanadas

Post on 24-Sep-2015

32 views

Category:

Documents


17 download

Report

DESCRIPTION

Two Phase Beggs Brill

TRANSCRIPT

2 Phase Fluid

Two Phase Flow - Beggs & Brill Method

CheCalc.comLine NumberP-10001Chemical Engineering CalculationsDescriptionFeed PipeDate11-May-15User Input ByCheCalcPipe DataMetricEnglish Inner Diameter50.67mm1.995inchPipe Roughness0.00180mm0.000071footPipe Length100.00m328.084footFlow DirectionuphillPipe Inclination angle 90 with horizontal GasFlowing Temperature32.2Deg C90.00Deg FInlet Pressure119bar1719.7psiVolumetric flowrate9.0m3/h5.31ft3/min@ Standard Conditions944.9Nm3/h @ 1 atm, 0C587.6SCFM @ 14.7 PSI, 60FDensity141.3Kg/m38.823lb/ft3Viscosity0.020cP1.34E-05lb/ft.sLiquidVolumetric flowrate4.75m3/h20.916US gpmDensity613.8Kg/m338.320lb/ft3Viscosity0.500cP3.36E-04lb/ft.sgas/liquid Surface tension28.0dyne/cmResultsFlow pattern mapIntermittentPressure drop due to headHoldup volume fraction, EL(0)0.4620.462Inclination correction factor, 1.0551.055Inclined holdup v.f, EL()0.4870.487Mixture density371.61Kg/m323.20lb/ft3DP due to Head3.64bar52.85psiPressure drop due to frictionFriction factor ratio1.4451.445No Slip Reynold's Number157713157713No Slip friction factor, fNS0.0042Fanning0.0042FanningTwo phase firction factor, fTP0.0060Fanning0.0060FanningDP due to friction0.26bar3.77psiTotal pressure drop3.90bar56.62psiCorrection due to acceleration0.9890.989Corrected Total Pressure drop3.95bar57.23psiPressure drop / Length3.95bar / 100 mt17.44psi / 100 ftCalculation (In English Units)Area of Pipe0.0217ft2Gravity constant, g32.174ft/s2LiquidGasFlowrate0.0466000002ft3/s0.08855ft3/sSuperficial Velocity2.147ft/s4.079ft/sWeight Flux, G82.26lb/ft2.s36.0lb/ft2.s

Mixture Velocity, Vm6.23ft/sLiquid Hold up, CL0.345Froude Number, Fr7.25Mixture Viscosity, m1.25E-04Mixture density18.99lb/ft3Flow Pattern MapCheck Flow regimesL1*229.1043SegregatedFALSEL2*0.0128IntermittentTRUEL3*0.4691DistributedFALSEL4*652.8663TransitionFALSESelected flow regimeIntermittent

Hydrostatic pressure differenceLiquid Holdup Volume Fraction Horizontal Flow EL(0)Segregated0.4926A-14.85Intermittent0.4619B15.85Distributed0.5077Selected0.4619Check for if greater than CL0.4619Liquid Holdup Correction FactorLiquid velocity number, Nvl4.50Flow direction option menuuphillCorrection factor, downhillUphill FlowSegregated1.0669Intermittent0.1844Distributed0.0000Downhill FlowAll Flow regimes0.7380Selected0.1844Check for negative values0.1844

Inclination angle, 1.57radiansB()1.055Liquid Holdup EL()EL(0)B()EL()For Transition flow-1.9257006375Segreg.0.49261.06691.3190.650Selected for transition flow0.3448Intermit.0.46190.18441.0550.487Selected Liquid holdup0.4874

Two phase density23.20lb/ft3DP due to hydrostatic head52.85psiPressure drop due to friction lossFriction factor ratioy1.4517ln(y)0.3727S0.3680S final0.3680Friction factor ratio, fTP/fNS1.4448No Slip Reynolds number157713

Friction factor estimate using Colebrook White equationEpsilon / D3.6E-05Re157713Iteration123456f0.00040.02610.01590.01670.01660.0166Iteration789101112f0.01660.01660.01660.01660.01660.0166Iteration131415161718f0.01660.01660.01660.01660.01660.0166Fanning friction factor0.0042Two phase friction factorft0.006DP due to friction loss3.77psiTotal pressure drop56.62psiCorrection factor due to accelerationEk0.011Total pressure drop57.23psi


Production operations and facilities engineering Page 66 ...stanko/files/Courses/POFE_UEM/2018/Notes/20181107.pdf · Govier, Aziz & Fogarasi Beggs & Brill Duns & Ros orkiszewski oo

BEGGS DEFORMETER

viSioN · PDF fileand Dale Beggs who wrote the Beggs & Brill Correlation. These are professors I studied with!” After graduation, Stewart put her education to good use

Visualization and measurement of two-phase flows in ... · oil, nuclear, and chemical industries (Beggs and Brill, 1973). The key parameters to characterize G/L mixture flows are:

Simulation of a Sub-Sea Gas Pipeline in Persian Gulf to ... · PDF filesoftware based on Beggs & Brill correlation for slug prediction in both vertical and horizontal pipes as well

Prediction of pressure drop in multiphase horizontal pipe flow · PDF fileCleveland[5]and Beggs Brill[6]two phase correlations and found that they over predicted Sl and Fr flow and

Beggs - Brill Method.pdf

Beggs and Brill Method

Development of an Algorithm of Dynamic Gridding for ... · this category are those by Duns and Ros (1963) and Beggs and Brill (1973). One of the drawbacks of all these correlations

A PRESSURE TRAVERSE ALGORITHM FOR ......(Brown, 1977), which is based on the work of Hagedorn and Brown (1965). Beggs and Brill (1973) developed an empirical approach for flow regimes

Of Rev 01 Nov 2015 Achieving Your Potential ... · Achieving Your Potential Education Certification Networking Page : 1 of 155 ... Beggs and Brill holdup contants ... Liquid Holdup

Influence of heat transfer on two-phase flow behavior in ... · PDF fileInfluence of heat transfer on two-phase ... Duns & Ross (1963), Beggs & Brill (1963 ... INFLUENCE OF HEAT TRANSFER

Sour Gas and Related Technologies - Buch.de · 2.2.1.3 Hall-Yarborough (HY) Model 24 . vi CONTENTS 2.2.1.4 Beggs and Brill (BB) Model ... Method 2.2.2.3 Wiehert-Aziz Correction Method

twophase flow in pipes (beggs & brill)sb5d8e4489ff1fa7d.jimcontent.com/download/version/1446514416/mod… · 3.6 Category c Correlations All of the methods in this category essentially

Brill Academic Publishers and Publishing with Brill...2015/09/06  · Brill Academic Publishers and Publishing with Brill Qin Higley Acquisitions Editor, Asian Studies Brill Academic

The Design of Oil Well Production Engineering Analysis …benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOMEJ/TOMEJ-9-437.pdf · or Beggs-Brill method, ... The Design of Oil Well Production Engineering

File Asli Beggs and Brill

Power Law and Composite Power Law Friction Factor ... · The accuracy of the correlations developed in this paper is evaluated in two ways; by ... (1964), Beggs and Brill (1973) and

SECARB Peters 3-9-11 - Transcending · PDF fileDwight Peters North America Business Manager Mar 9, 2011. Acknowledgements ... Beggs and Brill essure, MPa 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Pipeline

72 - truboprovod.ru“идросистема 3.80... · (Tulsa University Fluid Flow Projects ... (James P. Brill) ... как J.P. Brill, H.D. Beggs, H. Mukherjee, O. Shoham,

Beggs - Gas Production Operations.pdf

Innovating Gas-Lift for Life of Well Artificial Lift ... · PDF fileArtificial Lift Solution “The Unconventional Solution!” Glenn Wilde ... – Beggs & Brill 466 mcf/d . Critical

forgas - · PDF fileFORGAS FORGAS FORGAS forgas. Easy data entry using FGI FORGAS FGI FGI FGI Varioustypesofreservoirs IMEX ... Beggs-Brill, and Eaton

Gas Rate, GLR and Depth Sensitivities of Gas Lift ...ijetmas.com/admin/resources/project/paper/f201507291438138390.pdf · Beggs and Brill correlation is found the best fit correlation

Experimental Investigation of Three-Phase Low … · Experimental Investigation of Three-Phase Low-Liquid-Loading Flow ... Beggs and Brill ... to investigate two- and three-phase

Cashing Out - Becker & Beggs

Potential performance of environmental friendly ... · PDF fileThe correlations of Beggs-Brill good results, it is quite largely adopted in geothermal applications. m p C D ' Parameter

arXiv:1905.09746v1 [physics.data-an] 23 May 2019 · Among the most widely used are Aziz and Govier [9], Beggs & Brill [10], Mukherjee & Brill [11], and others. Many articles are concerned

Two Phase Flowsmech.sharif.ir/~saman/files/section6.pdfTwo phase flow in inclined pipes Multiphase Flow Research Group School of Mechanical Engineering The Basic Model Beggs and Brill

105742885 Calculation of Pressure Traverse Using Beggs and Brill

The Application of Risk Based Methods to Multilateral Well ... · calculated in Visual Basic using the Beggs and Brill correlation (Brill and Mukherjee 1999)

DEDICATION - core.ac.uk · Figure 5.22: Cross Plot of Orkiszewski Model .....41 Figure 5.23: Cross Plot of Beggs and Brill Model ... comparison analysis was conducted to evaluate

Ref.1: Brill & Beggs, Two Phase Flow in Pipes, 6 th Edition, 1991. Chapter 1. Ref.2: Menon, Gas Pipeline Hydraulic, Taylor & Francis, 2005, Chapter 2

Ref.1: Brill & Beggs, Two Phase Flow in Pipes, 6 th Edition, 1991. Chapter 2. Ref.2: Guo, Lyon & Ghalambor, Petroleum Production Engineering, Elsevier

EXPO Beggs and Brill ULTIMA