UConn 7/23/2003 1

Spatial release from maskingof chirp trains in a simulated

anechoic environment

Norbert Kopčo

Hearing Research CenterBoston University

Technical UniversityKošice, Slovakia

UConn 7/23/2003 2

Distance perception in reverberant environments- is consistent experience necessary for accurate distance perception?

- also, studies looking at other parameters (mono- vs. binaural, anechoic vs. reverberant, real vs. simulated environments)

“Room learning” and its effect on localization- is localization accuracy and “room learning” affected by changes in listener position

in a room?

Spatial cuing and localization- how does automatic attention, strategic attention, and room acoustics affect perceived

location of a sound preceded by an informative cuing sound?

Spatial release from masking- effect of signal and masker location on detectability/intelligibility of pure tones,

broadband non-speech stimuli, and speech in anechoic and reverberant environments

Studies of binaural and spatial hearing

UConn 7/23/2003 3

Spatial release from maskingof chirp trains in a simulated

anechoic environment

Collaborators

Barbara Shinn-Cunningham (BU) – Thesis Advisor

Courtney Lane (Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary)Bertrand Delgutte (Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary)

UConn 7/23/2003 4

Intro: Spatial release from masking

"Spatial unmasking" (or SRM) is an improvement in signal detection threshold when signal and noise are spatially separated.

N

S

N

S

UConn 7/23/2003 5

Intro: Spatial release from masking

"Spatial unmasking" (or SRM) is an improvement in signal detection threshold when signal and noise are spatially separated.

Spatial unmasking of low-frequency pure-tone stimuli depends on

- acoustic factors (change in the signal-to-noise energy ratio, SNR, due to change in location)

- binaural processing (improvement in signal detectability due to signal and noise interaural cues)

N

S

N

S

UConn 7/23/2003 6

Intro: Spatial release from masking

Spatial unmasking of broadband stimuli depends on (Gilkey and Good, 1995):

- energetic factors for all stimuli

- additional binaural factors for low-frequency stimuli

N

S

N

S

UConn 7/23/2003 7

Broadband stimuli: two possible mechanisms

1. auditory system integrates information across multiple channels

2. auditory system chooses single best channel with most favorable SNR ("single-best-filter" model)

Best channel hypothesis supported by comparison of single-unit thresholds from cat's inferior colliculus to human behavioral data (Lane et al., 2003).

UConn 7/23/2003 8

Current study

Test the single-best-filter hypothesis of spatial unmasking for broadband and lowpass stimuli

- measure spatial unmasking for broadband and lowpass chirp-train signals in noise in human

- compare performance to single-best-filter predictions

UConn 7/23/2003 9

Experimental methods: procedure

- five listeners with normal hearing- simulated anechoic environment

(i.e., under headphones)- measure detection threshold for

combinations of signal (S) and noise (N) locations (at 1 m)

- signal location fixed at one of three azimuths (0, 30, 90°)

- noise azimuth varies- 3-down-1-up adaptive procedure

(tracking 79.4% correct) varying N level

- three-interval, two-alternative forced choice task

UConn 7/23/2003 10

Experimental methods: stimuli

- signal: 200-ms 40-Hz chirp-train broadband: 0.3 - 12 kHz lowpass: 0.3 - 1.5 kHz

- noise: 250-ms white noise broadband: 0.2 - 14 kHz lowpass: 0.2 – 2 kHz

- convolved with non-individual anechoic human HRTFs to simulate source locations

UConn 7/23/2003 11

Single-best-filter model

Filterbank: 60 log-spaced gammatone filters per ear (Johannesma, 1972)

SNR computed in each filter

Single best filter found across all 120 filters

Predicted threshold = -SNR - T0 (T0 is a model parameter fitted to data)

Frequency

Signal at 0°

Noise at 90°

Best channel

Mag

nitu

de

a) Frequency spectra of sample stimuli

b) Filter with most favorable SNR is chosen

UConn 7/23/2003 12

Results: broadband stimuli

Data

- spatial unmasking of nearly 30 dB

Single-best-filter model

- produces accurate predictions (within 4 dB)

- tends to overestimate spatial unmasking

- single best filter has high frequency, so ...

- binaural processing unlikely to contribute

The single-best-filter model predicts broadband data

UConn 7/23/2003 13

Results: lowpass stimuliData

- thresholds worse than broadband

- spatial unmasking less than broadband

Single-best-filter model

- produces accurate predictions (within 3 dB)

- generally underestimates unmasking

- underestimation may be due to binaural processing

The single-best-filter model predicts lowpass data

UConn 7/23/2003 14

Results: broadband vs. lowpass stimuliData

- for all azimuths, broadband thresholds better than lowpass

Single-best-filter model

- predicts roughly equal thresholds for broadband and lowpass when near each other

The single-best-filter model cannot predict lowpass

and broadband data at the same time

UConn 7/23/2003 15

Results: narrowband vs. other stimuliData

- thresholds improve with increasing bandwidth

- highpass and broadband thresholds similar

- 10 ERB thresholds approach broadband

The single-best-filter model fails to predict thresholds' bandwidth dependence

- single ERB thresholds- 10 dB worse than broadband- approximately equal, indicating roughly equal SNR and information

in each ERB

Single-best-filter model predicts approximately equal thresholds for all conditions

UConn 7/23/2003 16

Conclusions: data

For these broadband stimuli, spatial unmasking

- improves thresholds by nearly 30 dB

- is dominated by energetic effects in the high frequencies

For these lowpass stimuli, spatial unmasking

- improves thresholds by at most 12 dB

- is dominated by low-frequency energetic effects

Binaural contribution is fairly small

Detection thresholds improve with bandwidth

UConn 7/23/2003 17

Conclusions: model

The single-best-filter model predicts the amount of spatial unmasking for broadband or lowpass stimuli.

However, the model threshold parameter must differ in order to achieve these fits.

More generally, the model cannot predict the observed dependence on signal bandwidth.

UConn 7/23/2003 18

Discussion

It is unlikely that any single-best-filter SNR-based model (regardless of exact implementation) can account for these results.

For broadband signal detection in noise, there appears to be across-frequency integration.

Only a model that integrates information across multiple frequency channels is likely to be able to account for these observations.

Brain centers higher than the midbrain seem necessary for the integration of information across frequency.

UConn 7/23/2003 19

Acknowledgements

Research supported by AFOSR and National Academy of Sciences

Steve Colburn and other people in the BU Hearing Research Center for comments on this works