ul 8800 test report - m.media-amazon.com

Report No.: NTC- SR2105007

of 32

UL 8800 TEST REPORT

Report No. ....................................... : NTC-SR2105007

Applicant’s name ............................ : Dongguan GDRTECH Semiconductor Lighting Co., Ltd.

Address ............................................ : Room 101, Building 1, No.22, Shangdong Road, Shanxia,

Hengli Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523462, China

DONGGUAN NEW TESTING CENTRE CO., LTD

Address: 3F, No. 1 the 1st North Industry Road, Songshan Lake Science & Technology Park,

Dongguan, Guangdong, China, 523808

Tel: +86-769-22212079 Web: http://www.ntc-cert.com E-mail: [email protected]

http://www.ntc-cert.com/


of 32

UL 8800

Horticultural Lighting Equipment And Systems

Report Reference No. ..................... : NTC-SR2105007

Date of issue ..................................... : May 07, 2021

Total number of pages ...................... 32 pages

Testing Laboratory ......................... : Dongguan New Testing Centre Co., Ltd

Address ............................................ : 3F, No. 1 the 1st North Industry Road, Songshan Lake Science &

Technology Park, Dongguan, Guangdong, China, 523808

Applicant’s name ............................ : Dongguan GDRTECH Semiconductor Lighting Co., Ltd.

Address ............................................ : Room 101, Building 1, No.22, Shangdong Road, Shanxia, Hengli

Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523462, China

Manufacturer’s name ..................... : Dongguan GDRTECH Semiconductor Lighting Co., Ltd.



Factory ............................................. : Dongguan GDRTECH Semiconductor Lighting Co., Ltd.



Test specification:

Standard ........................................... : UL 8800: 2019

EN 62471: 2008 and IEC 62471: 2006

UL 1598:2018 Ed.4

Test procedure ................................. : Safety Test Report

Test Report Form(s) Originator ..... : UL(US)

General disclaimer:

The test results presented in this report relate only to the object tested. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the Issuing Testing Laboratory. The authenticity of this Test Report and its contents can be verified by contacting the NTC, responsible for this Test Report.

Test item description ..................... : LED Grow Light

Trade Mark………………….…………: MAXSISUN

Model/Type reference ...................... : MF1000, MF2000

Ratings ............................................ .: Input: 100-240V~, 50/60Hz, Max.230W


of 32

Test By ............................................. : Jacky Zhang

Approved by .................................... : Neil Zhong

Test Required Performance Test Test Verdict

Yes N/A Test Item Description Pass Fail

INPUT TEST

NORMAL TEMPERATURE TEST

BONDING CIRCUIT IMPEDANCE

LOADING

POLYMERIC IMPACT

DIELECTRIC VOLTAGE-WITHSTAND TEST

ABNORMAL OPERATION TEST

LEAKAGE CURRENT TEST

TESTS FOR PERMANENCE OF CORD TAG

IMPACT TEST (CONT’D)

COLD IMPACT TEST

EN 62471: 2008 and IEC 62471: 2006


of 32

INSTRUMENTS REFERENCE LIST

Instr.

Code

Instr.

I.D.

Test

No.

+

Instr.

Name Range Used Model Make and

Model

Calibration Date

Name Last Next

NTCD-

S001 MY41033758 2 Hybrid Recorder

CH# 101-120: 0-

200°C

CH# 201-220: 0-

200°C

CH# 301-320: 0-

200°C

34970A Agilent 2020-11-16 2021-11-15

NTCD-

S012

YG100661N1

1110292 1,2,5

Digital Power

Meter

Current:0.1-20A

Voltage: 15-600V

Wattage: 35-6000W

PF: 0.2-1.0

50/60Hz

PF9800 EVERFINE 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTC-F01-

038 C120237133 1,5 Digital muli-meter

0.02-1000Vdc,0.2-

750Vac(50/60Hz),0.

2mA-10Adc, 2mA-

10Aac(50/60Hz)

20Ω-19MΩ

UT39C UNI-T 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S040 O967 2,3,5,7,8

Dielectric strength

tester

AC: 1-5KV, 0.5-

10mA

DC: 1-5kV, 0.5-

10mA,0-60s

CT26TZS CJ Radio 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S076 NTC-S34 All Temperature &

Humidity Meter

15-30︒C, 40%RH-

80%RH TH603 Anymeter 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S078 2607305

4 Pull-Push Scale 10-50kgf NK-500

LANKE 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S079 10061325

4 UL test finger Figure 2A DMS-A01

Demaisheng 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S079a 1809098

4 UL 1598 test finger

According to UL

1598 test finger FZ-1108 Han Yang

2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S090 SP01 4,5,6 Stop Watch 10S-24H PC894 TIAN Fu 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S093 2962 6 Oven 40-180︒C HN101A-0A NANTONG 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S099 N/A 2 Thermocouple 0-250°C

TT-J-30-

SLE OMEGA 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S109 N/A 7,8 Ruler 0-5M 5M / 2020-11-25 2021-11-24

NTCD-

S110 N/A 8 Impact Ball 51 mm OD,0.54 kg - SUNHO

Verify by Digital Caliper

and weight scale


of 32

TEST SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION: The table below is provided to establish correlation of sample numbers to specific product related information. Refer to this table when a test identifies a test sample by "Sample No." only.

Model list:

Model No. Input Input Power

LED Driver LED Chip option Dimension ta

MF1000 100-240V 100W XLG-100-H-AB

LM281B+, LDR-3030TDRCA-R660, LDR-3030TIFRCA-

R730, 10C18B, 350pcs

340*284*96.5mm

40

MF2000 100-240V 230W XLG-240-H-AB

LM281B+, LDR-3030TDRCA-R660, LDR-3030TIFRCA-

R730, 20C18B, 700pcs

548*345*99mm 40

The combine bunch of lamp beads is shown in the list 10C18B. “C” is combine, “B” is bunch. MF1000, MF2000 Was subjected to full test.

Model No. MF1000 MF2000 -- --

Sample Card No. S001 S002 -- --

Rated Input Supply Voltage, V

100-240 100-240 -- --

Rated Frequency, Hz 50/60 50/60 -- --

Rated System Wattage, W

100W 230W -- --

+ - If Test Number is used, the Test Number or Numbers the sample was used in must be identified on the data sheet pages or on the Data Sheet Package cover page.

[ ] Sampling Procedure - [ ] This document contains data or information using color and if printed, should be printed in color to retain legibility and the information represented by the color.


of 32

INPUT TEST:

Method: The input current (or wattage, if so rated) of a LED array, module, or package shall be

measured at rated input voltage. The input current (or wattage, if so rated) of a LED controller or driver shall be measured at

rated input voltage and supplying rated load. REQUIREMENT The measured input current of the device shall be within 10% of the rated input current. Exception: The measured input current of LED lighting strings and products employing only LED lighting strings shall not exceed 110% of the rated input current.

Sample No.

Model Driver Input voltage (V)/Hz

Input current

(A)

Input power

(W)

PF Output voltage

(V)

Output current

(A)

S001#1 MF1000

XLG-100-H-AB

100/50 1.014 101.5 0.999 49.48 1.787

100/60 1.017 101.8 0.998 49.48 1.787

240/50 0.413 97.0 0.977 49.48 1.787

240/60 0.417 97.2 0.969 49.48 1.787

S002#1 MF2000

XLG-240-H-AB

100/50 2.289 229.7 0.999 50.59 3.975

100/60 2.278 229.8 0.999 50.59 3.975

240/50 0.932 221.2 0.987 50.59 3.975

240/60 0.941 221.4 0.979 50.59 3.975


of 32

NORMAL TEMPERATURE TEST:

METHOD

One sample is to be connected to a rated supply circuit. The unit is to be operated continuously for a minimum of 3 hours, under representative intended service conditions that are likely to produce the highest temperature, until constant temperatures were attained. [ ] The sample is to be covered with cheesecloth and placed on tissue-paper-wrapped pine board. (Products employing incandescent lamps need not be subjected to this requirement). [ ] A decorative lighting string employing candelabra or incandescent screw lamps but does not employ

electronic devices is to be tested with all lamps operating at an envelope temperature of 90C (194F) by adjusting the input voltage above or below 120 V. [ ] A decorative lighting string employing candelabra or incandescent screw lamps and electronic devices is to be first tested at 120 V while only measuring the temperatures in the area of the electronic

devices. The test voltage is to be adjusted to obtain a lamp envelope temperature of 90C and only the temperatures in the lamp areas are to be measured. [X] The sample is to be tested in a position most likely to produce maximum temperatures. The lamp and lampholder assembly is to be tested while supported in free air with the lampholders in the base-up filament-down position. See Figures 43.1 and 43.2 of UL 588. [ ] The sample is to be tested with its setting adjusted to produce the highest temperatures, either with the lamps “on” in a steady state condition or flashing at the rate which produces the highest temperature. [ ] One unused receptacle of the sample is to be adjusted to a current level equal to the fuse rating (____ A). [X] A decorative lighting string employing LED lamps shall be tested with the lamps in the forward bias position, and then with one of the LED lamps in the reverse bias position. [ ] A decorative lighting string which employs individual flashing lamps shall be tested with the lamps in the circuit and then with the individual lamps shorted.


of 32

DIELECTRIC VOLTAGE-WITHSTAND TEST:

METHOD The dielectric voltage-withstand test apparatus was provided with a 40 to 70 Hz transformer having an essentially sinusoidal output with a rating sufficient to maintain the required test potential and a means of indicating and regulating the output test potential. The sensitivity for the trip circuit was a maximum of 100 mA at the specified test voltage and the equipment included an audible or visible indication of breakdown. [X] The output of the test equipment was 500 VA or more. The test potential was indicated by a voltmeter in the primary circuit or in a tertiary winding circuit, by a selector switch marked to indicate the test potential, or by a marking in a readily visible location to indicate the test potential of equipment having a single test potential output. If a marking was used without an indicating voltmeter, the equipment included a positive means, such as a power-on lamp, to indicate that the manually reset switch had reset following a tripout. [ ] The output of the test equipment was less than 500 VA. The equipment included a voltmeter in the output circuit to indicate the test potential. [ ] A test potential was applied for one minute between live parts and accessible noncurrent-carrying metal parts, including parts accessible only during relamping.

The test potential was:

[ ] 1000 V for incandescent-type luminaires [X] 1000 V plus twice the rated input voltage for all other types of luminaire

[X] A test potential was applied for one minute between: (A) primary circuit and accessible noncurrent-

current carrying metal conductive parts; The test potential was:

[X] 1000 V plus twice the maximum rated input voltage for conditions A and B [ ] 500 V for condition C (when secondary circuit operates at no more than 70V peak) [ ] 1000V plus twice the maximum rated secondary voltage for condition C (when the

secondary circuit operates at greater than 70 V peak) [ ] a dc potential of 1.414 times (2V + 1000), where V is the rms supply voltage for condition D

If an ac potential results in excessive leakage through capacitors during the test specified in

conditions (A) and (B), the capacitors are to be removed from the circuit for the ac potential. With the capacitors connected in the circuit, the unit shall withstand a DC potential of 1.414 times the AC rms potential between the points specified.

An applied potential of _1480_V was gradually increased from zero at a uniform rate until the required test value was reached or breakdown occurred. During the test, any switches or other controls were in the ON position. The test was performed on a fully assembled luminaire. Noncurrent-carrying parts or decorative parts not likely to become energized were not required to be in place. [ ] Solid state components not relied upon to reduce the risk of electric shock and that could be damaged by the applied dielectric potential were disconnected for the test.


of 32

DIELECTRIC VOLTAGE-WITHSTAND TEST: (For all seasonal lighting products) (CONT’D):

[ ] Circuitry was rearranged for this test to reduce the likelihood of solid state component damage while retaining the representative dielectric stress on the circuit.

RESULTS

Test Instance

Test Date

Measured Test Voltage, V

Breakdown?

[X] As Received * 1480V/500V [ ] Yes [X] No

[X] After Normal Temperature Test [ ] Yes [X] No

[X] After HUMIDITY EXPOSURE [ ] Yes [X] No

* SEE DETAILS IN INDIVIDUAL TEST ITEM

[X] The results were considered acceptable since there was no indication of dielectric breakdown. [ ] The results were considered unacceptable since there was a dielectric breakdown between _____________ and ____________. No general environmental conditions are specified in the Standard or have been identified that could affect

the test results or measurements.

Model Tested Part Test Conditions

Dielectric Breakdown

Y/N

MF1000, MF2000

(a) 1500V # N

(b) 1500V # N

(d) 1500V # N

# An actual test value greater than the rating is acceptable.


of 32

BONDING CIRCUIT IMPEDANCE: (CONT’D)

METHOD II The test was conducted to determine the voltage drop between accessible non-current carrying metal luminaire parts likely to become energized and the grounding termination point where the branch circuit equipment grounding conductor is connected. The test apparatus consisted of an indicating instrument and an AC or DC power supply having an appropriately rated output open circuit voltage (Voc) that was capable of providing a current of 30 A through the luminaire bonding test circuit to ground. The test was conducted by passing the bonding test circuit current through the accessible luminaire part to the luminaire grounding termination point for a period of 2 minutes. The voltage drop between these two bonding points was measured at the end of the 2 minute period and the recorded in the table below.

RESULTS

Model Number: MF1000 MF2000 --

Sample Number: S001#2 S002#2 --

Measured Power Supply Output - Voc, V: 10 10 --

Measured Bonding Test Circuit - Current, A: 30 30 --

Test Date: 2021-04-25 2021-04-25 --

Accessible Part Measured Potential Drop (Volts)

1. Driver Housing, furthest from Grounding 1.40 1.41 --

2. Housing, furthest from Grounding 1.62 1.55 --

[X] The results were considered acceptable since the resulting voltage drop did not exceed 4 V; and there was no melting of any metal in the bond, and no heating or burning, which was likely to create a fire hazard. [ ] The results were considered unacceptable since one or more of the following occurred: [ ] the resulting voltage drop exceeded 4 V. [ ] and there was melting of metal in the bonding circuit. [ ] there was heating or burning, which was likely to create a fire hazard. No general environmental conditions are specified in the Standard or have been identified that could affect the test results or measurements.


of 32

LOADING: Note: For luminaires that use special hardware. Product Weight:

Sample No. Model No. Weight (kg)

S001#03 MF1000 1.95

S002#03 MF2000 3.75

METHOD The supporting device was subjected to a load equal to four times the total mass to be supported under intended operating conditions for a period of 1 hour. The load was applied in the direction of actual loading conditions. Where more than one support was provided, the load was distributed as follows: a) where the parts supported were no more than 11.3 kg (25 lbs), the full load was applied to each support; or b) where the parts supported were more than 11.3 kg (25 lbs), the distribution of the load was similar to that encountered in the field.

Supporting Device Identification Luminaire Weight

[lbs] [kg] Load#

[lbs] [kg]

Chain 3.75 15

# This value equals four times the total weight of the luminaire (e.g.: if luminaire weighs 2 kg, then an additional 6 kg is loaded onto the luminaire for this test)

RESULTS

Supporting Device Identification

Load Added to Supporting Device [lbs] [kg]

Chain 15

[X] The results were considered acceptable since there was no deflection or deformation either during or after loading that reduced electrical spacings or compromised safety.


of 32

LOADING: (CONT’D) [ ] The results were considered unacceptable since: [ ] There was deflection or deformation during or after loading that reduced electrical spacings. [ ] There was deflection or deformation during or after loading that compromised safety. Start: Date 2021-04-

27 Time 9:30 Stop: Date 2021-04-

27 Time 10:30

No general environmental conditions are specified in the Standard or have been identified that could affect the test results or measurements.

Date Lab Condition

Ambient Temperature, C Relative Humidity, %

2021-04-27 25.8 49.8


of 32

MOLD STRESS RELIEF:

Note: For thermoplastic materials only.

METHOD The thermoplastic parts, as noted below, were placed in a full-draft circulating-air oven maintained at a uniform temperature as noted below. This conditioning temperature was at least 10°C higher than the measured temperature, or 70°C, whichever was greater, for seven hours. After removal from the oven, the sample was allowed to return to room temperature and was then inspected. DATA

Part Under Test Conditioning

Temperature (°C)

Enclosure 70

RESULTS

Part Under Test Conditioning

Temperature (°C) Spacing

Reduced? (+) Accessibility to Live

Parts? (+) Any Damage? (+)

Diffuser 70 [ ]Yes [X]No [ ]Yes [X]No [ ]Yes [X]No

(+) Note: "No" indicates passing results. "Yes" indicates noncompliance as noted below.

Start Stop

Test Date: 2021-04-25 2021-04-25

Time: 9:00 16:00

Measured Oven Temp., °C:

70 70


of 32

MOLD STRESS RELIEF: (CONT’D)

[ ] The results were acceptable since there was no reduction of spacings to values below the minimum acceptable values as specified in the standard; there was no accessibility to contact of uninsulated live parts or internal wiring as determined by the accessibility probe described in the standard; and the structural integrity or securement of live parts was not affected. [ ] The results were unacceptable since: [ ] There was reduction of spacings to values below the minimum acceptable values as specified in the standard. [ ] There was accessibility to contact of uninsulated live parts or internal wiring as determined by the accessibility probe described in the standard. [ ] The structural integrity or securement of live parts was affected. No general environmental conditions are specified in the Standard or have been identified that could affect the test results or measurements.


of 32

LED NORMAL TEMPERATURE, SURFACE, GENERAL:

Note: Clause references from UL 1598/CSA 250.0 unless otherwise noted. The luminaire was installed as intended per the installation instructions and tested in accordance with the test method(s) selected below:

[X] SURFACE CEILING LUMINAIRES [ ] Intended for non-combustible surfaces only

Clause 15.2 Clause 15.2.5

[ ] SURFACE WALL LUMINAIRES Clause 15.3

[ ] UNDER-CABINET LUMINAIRES Clause 15.4

[ ] RACEWAY TEMPERATURE Clause 15.11

The test was conducted in accordance with the TEST PROCEDURES AND APPARATUS requirements selected below, and as noted in the TEST PARAMETER TABLE:

INSTALLATION AND SUPPORT, GENERAL [ ] ADJUSTABLE LUMINAIRE: ________________ [ ] FLOOR-MOUNTED LUMINAIRE [ ] POLE-MOUNTED LUMINAIRE

Clause 19.1.1 Clause 19.1.2 Clause 19.1.3 Clause 19.1.4

TEMPERATURE TEST STABILIZATION Clause 19.2

VOLTAGE Clause 19.3

FREQUENCY Clause 19.4

AMBIENT TEMPERATURE [ ] 25 ± 5°C [X] Elevated: 40 °C Clause 19.5

THERMOCOUPLES Clause 19.7

BRANCH CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR TEMPERATURE PROBE Clause 19.9

[X] SURFACE CEILING TEMPERATURE TEST APPARATUS Clause 19.10

[ ] SURFACE WALL TEMPERATURE TEST APPARATUS Clause 19.11

[ ] SURFACE-MOUNTED UNDERCABINET LUMINAIRE TEST ALCOVE Clause 19.12


of 32

LED NORMAL TEMPERATURE, SURFACE, GENERAL: (CONT’D)

TEST PARAMETER TABLE

[X] Test #1

[X] Test #2

[ ] Test #3

Luminaire model number or detailed description

MF1000 MF2000 --

Luminaire Supply (V/Hz or description)

100V/60Hz 100V/60HZ --

[X] LED Driver (mfg./cat. no.) XLG-100-H-AB XLG-240-H-AB --

[X] LED Driver type [ ] Built-in [ ] Remote

[ ] Built-in [ ] Remote

[ ] Built-in [ ] Remote

[X] Luminaire Orientation Light downwards light downwards --

[ ] An incandescent lamp was used to represent the intended SBCFL or SBLED lamp in accordance with UL 1598 CRD dated 2018-10-04


of 32

LED NORMAL TEMPERATURE, SURFACE: (CONT’D)

RESULTS

Input: 100 V, 60 Hz, 1.017 A, 101.8 W, 0.998 PF

LED driver output: _49.48V, _1.787__A__88.42_W (when with driver need to record the output at luminaire load)

Remark: The Infrared Thermometer should be used to determine the hottest point of mounting surface.

Result: Model: MF1000, Sample No.: S001#1

Channel Location Actual Temp to

amb. 40 oC Limit (oC)

CH1 AC plug 27.3 41.1 70

CH2 Input wire 27.1 40.9 105

CH3 AC outlet 28.5 42.3 105

CH4 AC Inlet 34.7 48.5 70

CH5 Terminal 32.3 46.1 105

CH6 Switch body 34.8 48.6 70

CH7 AC Output Terminal 39.6 53.4 70

CH8 LED driver Tc 69.2 83.0 90

CH9 Terminal 58.9 72.7 105

CH10 Plastic enclosure(Marking) 56.4 70.2 105

CH11 PCB near U2 56.6 70.4 130

CH12 PCB near Q1 55.2 69.0 130

CH13 Output wire near LED PWB 61.4 75.2 105

CH14 LED PWB 65.2 79.0 105

CH15 Metal enclosure 58.7 72.5 Ref.

CH16 Ambient 26.2 40.0 Ref.

Resistance method


of 32

Input: 100 V, 60 Hz, 2.278 A, 228.8 W, 0.999 PF

LED driver output: _50.59_V, _3.975_A__201.10_W (when with driver need to record the output at luminaire load)

Remark: The Infrared Thermometer should be used to determine the hottest point of mounting surface.

Result: Model: MF2000, Sample No.: S002#1

Channel Location Actual Temp to

amb. 40 oC Limit (oC)

CH1 AC plug 28.2 42.0 70

CH2 Input wire 27.5 41.3 105

CH3 AC outlet 30.4 44.2 105

CH4 AC Inlet 36.8 50.6 70

CH5 Terminal 35.2 49.0 105

CH6 Switch body 38.7 52.5 70

CH7 AC Output Terminal 46.9 60.7 70

CH8 LED driver Tc 73.2 87.0 90

CH9 Terminal 58.9 72.7 105

CH10 Plastic enclosure(Marking) 57.2 71.0 105

CH11 PCB near U2 57.2 71.0 130

CH12 PCB near Q1 56.5 70.3 130

CH13 Output wire near LED PWB 65.2 79.0 105

CH14 LED PWB 74.5 88.3 105

CH15 Metal enclosure 73.2 87.0 Ref.

CH16 Ambient 26.2 40.0 Ref.

Resistance method


of 32

LED NORMAL TEMPERATURE, SURFACE: (CONT’D)

Electrical measurements were recorded in the table below both at the 15 minute mark and at the end of the temperature test: The ending current measurement [was] [was not] within 10 percent of the current measurement at 15 minutes.

LAB TECH: Contact engineer if there is a 10% or greater difference in the current measurements.

[X] The results of the above tests are considered acceptable since the temperature did not exceed the limits as specified in the Standard, and any thermal protector or supplementary protective device did not operate. [X] There was no breakdown as a result of the dielectric test. [ ] The results of the above tests were considered unacceptable since one or more of the following occurred: [ ] The temperatures exceeded the limits as specified in the Standard. [ ] The thermal protector or supplementary protective device operated. [ ] There was a dielectric breakdown as a result of the applied test voltage.

Note: Charts, printouts or additional data showing temperature stabilization for 3 successive readings at not less than 15 min. intervals shall be included with this package.

Date Lab Condition


2021-04-26 25.2 51.5


of 32

COMPONENT FAILURE (ABNORMAL) TEST: SAMPLE:

GENERAL This test determines that a risk of fire or electric shock is not produced under the conditions of separately short-circuiting or open-circuiting any unreliable component - one terminal to another (one pair at a time) or any electrolytic capacitor located in circuitry capable of delivering 50-Watts or more.

METHOD After the ultimate results were obtained for each test, the device under test was allowed to cool to room temperature and the Dielectric Withstand Test was repeated. For abnormal-operation tests, the sample was operated according to applicable requirements specified below.

The faulted sample was tested in an ambient temperature of 25C + /- 5C. A double layer of cheesecloth was draped over the sample under test, conforming to the outline of the test sample.

LAB TECH NOTE: The cloth draped over the sample under test was to serve as a flame indicator (presence of ash or burnt holes), not as a blanket to entrap heat.

All accessible conductive parts were connected to earth ground through a 3-A, non-time-delay type fuse. The unit was energized at rated input voltage of _100__V at _60_Hz. The supply circuit was connected in series with a 20 A fuse (time delay type) that does not open in less than 12 s when carrying 40 A. The device under test was draped with a double layer of cheesecloth conforming to the outline of the unit. The components were short-circuited one at a time. The sample under test was tested in the fault condition until:

a) Until a risk of fire or electric shock developed, but not longer than 7 h.

b) The test circuit opened or reacted in some manner to terminate the abnormal operation condition.


of 32

COMPONENT FAILURE ABNORMAL TEST (CONT’D):

c) A predictable shut-down circuit terminated the abnormal operation condition before overheating of parts occurs.

d) A minimum of 30 minutes elapsed, circuit conditions were stabilized, and there was no further

evidence of any overheating of parts.

e) The branch-circuit fuse opened. Each of the fault conditions tabulated under RESULTS was evaluated in this manner. A risk of fire or electrical shock is considered to exist if any of the following occur:

a) Charring, glowing or burning of the cheesecloth;

b) Emission of flame or molten material from the unit enclosure;

c) Opening of the 3-A ground fuse;

d) Any condition that exposes live parts that pose a risk of electric shock;

e) Indication of dielectric breakdown; An abnormal-operation test was conducted once. If there was evidence of overheating of parts, the test was repeated using new components, when necessary, and the unit repaired to its intended operating condition.


of 32


RESULTS

Test No. [X] Sample

[X] Model

Number

Component Faulted –

(S)hort Circuit (O)pen

Opening of Fuse?

Charring of Cheesecloth?

Signs of: molten

material? Flames?

Mode Comments

[X] 1 S001#4

MF1000

LED, S [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] Input:240V,0.398A, 88.7W

Normal operation,

7 hrs

No hazard

No fire

[X] 2 S001#5

MF1000

LED, O [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] Input:240V,0.401A, 90.3W

Normal operation,

7 hrs

No hazard

No fire

[X] 3 S002#4

MF2000

LED, S [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] Input:240V,0.916A, 200.1W

Normal operation,

7 hrs

No hazard

No fire

[X] 4 S002#5

MF2000

LED, O [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] Input:240V,0.921A, 202.6W

Normal operation,

7 hrs

No hazard

No fire

[ ] 5 LED, S [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No]

[ ] 6 LED, O [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [No]

There [was] [was no] emission of flame or molten metal, combustion, glowing, flaming, or disintegration of the cotton. There was [no] indication of a dielectric voltage breakdown as a result of the dielectric voltage withstand test. These results [were] [were not] in compliance.

Test No.:

Start Date: Start Time: Stop Date: Stop Time:

1 2021-04-25 09:00 2021-04-25 16:00

2 2021-04-25 09:00 2021-04-25 16:00

3 2021-04-25 09:00 2021-04-25 16:00


of 32

4 2021-04-25 09:00 2021-04-25 16:00

Ambient Temp., °C: 25.6

TEST NUMBER 1 2 3 4 -- --

MEASURED SUPPLY

VOLTAGE (V)

240 240 240 240 -- --

ENGINEERING NOTE: The opening of the 20A time delay fuse as a result of the particular component fault condition signifies compliance.


of 32


DIELECTRIC VOLTAGE-WITHSTAND AFTER COMPONENT FAILURE

METHOD [X] See description of the Dielectric Voltage-withstand test described elsewhere in the test report. [X] Prior to conducting the dielectric test, the sensitivity of the dielectric tester was checked. The sensitivity of the dielectric tester - which indicates breakdown - was adjusted to indicate a breakdown when the tester was connected to a 120,000-ohm load. For a 1200 V test potential, the sensitivity will be approximately 10 mA.

Instructions - Select one or describe how voltage was determined.

The dielectric potential was, [X] the same as in the Dielectric Test previously conducted, [X] 1554 Volts, [X] 500 Volts [ ] The test potential was applied between internal live parts and the metal enclosure, any dead metal part that was intended to be grounded, or an accessible dead metal part that could be energized from within. [ ] Live parts and accessible dead metal parts that could be energized from within the device. [ ] V ac between primary circuits and exposed conductive surfaces. [ ] V ac between primary and secondary circuits. [ ] V ac between the V and V secondary circuits [with common connections disconnected]. [ ] 500 V ac between secondary circuits and exposed conductive parts [with common connections disconnected]. [ ] V ac between different windings of inductors located in primary circuits. [ ] V dc between the leads of across-the-line capacitors, as AC potential resulted in excessive leakage through capacitors. Therefore, the capacitors were removed from the circuit for the AC potential. With the capacitors connected in the circuit, the unit was subjected to potential of 1.414 times the AC rms potential.


of 32


RESULTS [X] There was no indication of a breakdown in the insulation system for any of the above. [X] The electrical spacing and insulation withstood the application of the specified potentials for one min without indication of breakdown. [ ] An indication of dielectric breakdown occurred during testing between

Other Observations:

Date Lab Condition


2021-04-23 25.5 47.7


of 32

ENVIRONMENTAL TEST – HUMIDITY EXPOSURE:

METHOD A sample of the device was placed in a humidity chamber having a relative humidity of 88 ± 2% at a temperature of 32 ± 2°C (89.6 ± 3.6°F) for 168 hours (1 week). At the end of the conditioning, the device under test was removed from humidity cabinet, placed on an insulated surface, and the Dielectric Voltage-Withstand Test was conducted.

RESULTS

Chamber

Temperature, C 33 Chamber Relative Humidity % 90

Test Model: MF1000, MF2000

Sample Number: S001#04 S002#04

[X] There [was] [was no] indication of a breakdown in the insulation system for any of the above. [X] As a result of the sample examination after the test, it was noted the sample [did] [did not] operate normally. [X] These results [are] [are not] considered acceptable.

Start Stop

Date Time Date Time

2021-04-22 17:25 2021-04-29 17:25

Other Observations:

DIELECTRIC VOLTAGE-WITHSTAND AFTER HUMIDITY EXPOSURE

METHOD [X] See description of the Dielectric Voltage-withstand test described elsewhere in the test report. [X] Prior to conducting the dielectric test, the sensitivity of the dielectric tester was checked. The sensitivity of the dielectric tester - which indicates breakdown - was adjusted to indicate a breakdown when the tester was connected to a 120,000-ohm load. For a 1200 V test potential, the sensitivity will be approximately 10 mA.


of 32

ENVIRONMENTAL TEST – HUMIDITY EXPOSURE (CONT’D):

Instructions - Select one or describe how voltage was determined.

The dielectric potential was, [X] the same as in the Dielectric Test previously conducted, [X] 1544 Volts, [X] 500 Volts [ ] The test potential was applied between internal live parts and the metal enclosure, any dead metal part that was intended to be grounded, or an accessible dead metal part that could be energized from within. [ ] Live parts and accessible dead metal parts that could be energized from within the device. [ ] V ac between primary circuits and exposed conductive surfaces. [ ] V ac between primary and secondary circuits. [ ] V ac between the V and V secondary circuits [with common connections disconnected]. [ ] 500 V ac between secondary circuits and exposed conductive parts [with common connections disconnected]. [ ] V ac between different windings of inductors located in primary circuits. [ ] V dc between the leads of across-the-line capacitors, as AC potential resulted in excessive leakage through capacitors. Therefore, the capacitors were removed from the circuit for the AC potential. With the capacitors connected in the circuit, the unit was subjected to potential of 1.414 times the AC rms potential.

RESULTS [X] There was no indication of a breakdown in the insulation system for any of the above. [X] The electrical spacing and insulation withstood the application of the specified potentials for one min without indication of breakdown. [ ] An indication of dielectric breakdown occurred during testing between

Other Observations:


of 32

IEC 62471: 2006

Testing voltage: 240Vac, 0.941A, 221.4W, 0.979PF Conclusion: LED in corporate in this model is belong to _Risk Group 2_ according

to EN 62471: 2008 and IEC 62471: 2006

Alpha = 0.0804rad

Risk Unit Tmax

Emission Measurement (α= 0.0830rad)

Exempt Low risk Mod risk

Limit Result Limit Result Limit Result

Es * W•m-2 170s 1.0e-0.003 1.6e-003 3.0e-003 1.8e-003 3.0e-002 1.5e-003

EUVA W•m-2 >1000s 1.0e+001 5.2e-002 3.3e+001 5.0e-002 1.0e+002 5.7e-002

EB W•m-2 - - 4.44e+001 - 4.74e+001 - 4.52e+001

EIR W•m-2 >1000s 1.0e+002 1.2e+000 5.7e+002 1.0e+000 3.2e+003 1.0e+000

Eh W•m-2 >10s 3556.56 3.5e+002 3556.56 3.2e+002 3556.56 3.25e+002

Lb W•m-2•sr-1 359s 1.0e+002 2.31e+002 1.0e+004 2.78e+003 4.0e+006 2.52e+003

Lr W•m-2•sr-1 >10s 3.5e+005 4.30e+004 3.5e+005 4.1e+004 8.8e+005 3.2e+004

Lir W•m-2•sr-1 - - 2.75e+001 - 3.0e+001 - 3.55e+001

* Small source defined as one with α < 0,011 radian. Averaging field of view at 10000 s is 0,1 radian. ** Involves evaluation of non-GLS source


of 32

Product Sample

Picture 1: Front View (Model: MF1000)

Picture 2: Back View (Model: MF1000)


of 32

Picture 3: Front View (Model: MF2000)

Picture 4: Back View (Model: MF2000)


of 32

Picture 5: LED Power Supply (Model: MF2000)

Picture 6: Inside connecting line (Model: MF2000)


of 32

Picture 7: PCB LED Front View (Model: MF2000)

Picture 8: PCB LED Front View (Model: MF2000)

--END OF DATASHEET PACKAGE--

ul 8800 test report - m.media-amazon.com

Documents