ultrasound screening for down syndrome - lieberman's...
TRANSCRIPT
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
Ultrasound Screening Ultrasound Screening for Down Syndromefor Down Syndrome
Joshua U. KleinJoshua U. KleinHarvard Medical School Year IIIHarvard Medical School Year III
Gillian Lieberman, MDGillian Lieberman, MD
September 2003
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
22
Patient EHPatient EH
35 35 y/oy/o G0P0 G0P0
IVF treatment; now pregnant with IVF treatment; now pregnant with di/didi/di twins, GA by LMP = 13 weeks, 0 daystwins, GA by LMP = 13 weeks, 0 days
Presents with bleedingPresents with bleeding
Undergoes Undergoes transabdominaltransabdominal ultrasoundultrasound
Presenting fetus is Presenting fetus is ““ultrasonically somewhat ultrasonically somewhat increased risk for Downincreased risk for Down”” due to increased due to increased nuchalnuchal translucency translucency
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
33
Down Syndrome: Background IDown Syndrome: Background I
TrisomyTrisomy 21: most common chromosome 21: most common chromosome abnormality among live births (1/730)abnormality among live births (1/730)
Clinical Manifestations:Clinical Manifestations:–– Mental Deficiency (Average IQ 25Mental Deficiency (Average IQ 25--50)50)–– Flat facial profile (90%)Flat facial profile (90%)–– HypotoniaHypotonia (80%)(80%)–– HyperflexibilityHyperflexibility of joints (80%)of joints (80%)–– Upward slanting Upward slanting palpebralpalpebral fissures (80%)fissures (80%)–– Simian crease (45%)Simian crease (45%)–– Congenital heart disease (e.g. Congenital heart disease (e.g. EndocardialEndocardial cushion defect, cushion defect,
VSD VSD –– 40%)40%)
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
44
Down Syndrome: Background IIDown Syndrome: Background II
Pathogenesis: Meiotic nonPathogenesis: Meiotic non--disjunction disjunction increasing risk with advanced maternal ageincreasing risk with advanced maternal age
From www.uptodate.com, adapted from Cuckle, HS et al. BJOG 1987; 94:387
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
55
Screening I: AMA Screening I: AMA
97% of Down pregnancies occur in families with no 97% of Down pregnancies occur in families with no previous history of the syndromeprevious history of the syndrome
Amniocentesis: Effective diagnosis but 1% risk fetal Amniocentesis: Effective diagnosis but 1% risk fetal lossloss
Only 12.9% of all children are born to mothers age Only 12.9% of all children are born to mothers age > 35 > 35
only about 30% of Down babies are born only about 30% of Down babies are born
to to ““AMAAMA”” mothersmothers
Goal: isolate highest risk pregnancies for Goal: isolate highest risk pregnancies for amniocentesis/CVSamniocentesis/CVS
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
66
Screening II: SerumScreening II: Serum
Serum Screening:Serum Screening:–– ““Triple TestTriple Test””: Free B: Free B--hCGhCG, AFP, uE3, AFP, uE3
---- 22ndnd trimestertrimester---- 69% sensitive69% sensitive---- 9.3% false positive9.3% false positive
---- ““Quadruple TestQuadruple Test””: Triple Test + : Triple Test + inhibininhibin AA---- 22ndnd trimestertrimester---- 80% sensitive80% sensitive---- 6.2% false positive6.2% false positive
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
77
Screening III: Screening III: NuchalNuchal TranslucencyTranslucency
Best overall screening test: Best overall screening test: Quadruple test (2Quadruple test (2ndnd trimester) + PAPPtrimester) + PAPP--A (1A (1stst trimester) + NT trimester) + NT at 10 weeks at 10 weeks
85% sensitivity, 1.2% false85% sensitivity, 1.2% false--positive ratepositive rate
From www.uptodate.com adapted from Wald NJ, et al. J Med Screen 1997; 4:181.
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
88
Ultrasound: Basics IUltrasound: Basics I
Current is applied to a Current is applied to a transducer made of transducer made of piezoelectric crystal, piezoelectric crystal, generating highgenerating high--frequency frequency sound waves which pass sound waves which pass through the soft tissuethrough the soft tissue
Interface of different densities Interface of different densities (acoustic impedance) reflects (acoustic impedance) reflects some of the energy, some of the energy, proportional to the difference proportional to the difference in densitiesin densities
The reflected energy generates The reflected energy generates small voltage, amplified and small voltage, amplified and represented by light/dark on represented by light/dark on screen screen
Bone, air, fat: whiteBone, air, fat: white
Fluid: darkFluid: dark
Solid organs: greySolid organs: grey
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
99
Ultrasound: Basics IIUltrasound: Basics II
Advantages:Advantages:–– No ionizing radiation No ionizing radiation
pregnancypregnancy–– Any planeAny plane–– InexpensiveInexpensive–– Portable Portable -- bedsidebedside–– RealReal--time imagestime images
Disadvantages:Disadvantages:–– Fuzzy imagesFuzzy images–– SkillSkill--dependentdependent
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1010
Routine UltrasoundRoutine Ultrasound
1111--14 weeks14 weeks
Assess:Assess:---- Viability, number, sizeViability, number, size---- Anatomy:Anatomy:
---- Head/Brain (BPD, HC)Head/Brain (BPD, HC)---- Cardiac Cardiac ---- Abdomen (stomach, bowel, AC)Abdomen (stomach, bowel, AC)---- Urinary (bladder, kidneys)Urinary (bladder, kidneys)---- Limbs (FL, HL)Limbs (FL, HL)
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1111
NuchalNuchal Translucency MeasurementTranslucency Measurement
Increase in the size of the normal, clear area behind the fetal Increase in the size of the normal, clear area behind the fetal neck (>2.5 mm or 95neck (>2.5 mm or 95thth percentile)percentile)
Optimal time: 11Optimal time: 11--13 weeks13 weeks
TransabdominalTransabdominal or or transvaginaltransvaginal
SagittalSagittal SectionSection
Magnification: Fetus should occupy 75% of the imageMagnification: Fetus should occupy 75% of the image
Distinguish between fetal skin and amnionDistinguish between fetal skin and amnion
Fetus in neutral position (i.e. not flexed/extended)Fetus in neutral position (i.e. not flexed/extended)
From http://www.nuchalscans.co.uk/images/scan2.gif
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1212
NTNT
Normal NT Increased NT
From www.uptodate.com http://womenshealth.jhmi.edu/ob-ultrasound/services/nts.html
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1313
NT PathophysiologyNT Pathophysiology
Cardiac malformation/dysfunctionCardiac malformation/dysfunction
Alterations in the extracellular matrixAlterations in the extracellular matrix
Lymphatic abnormalitiesLymphatic abnormalities
Precise etiology remains unknownPrecise etiology remains unknown
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1414
Patient EHPatient EH
PACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1515
Patient EH: Twin APatient EH: Twin A
PACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1616
Patient EH: Twin BPatient EH: Twin B
PACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1717
NT: NT: ““Dose ResponseDose Response””
Increased incidence of Increased incidence of trisomiestrisomies 21, 18, and 21, 18, and 13:13:
NT = 3mm NT = 3mm
3X3XNT = 4mm NT = 4mm
18X18X
NT = 5mm NT = 5mm
28X28XNT = >6mm NT = >6mm
36X36X
Patient EH, Twin A: Only mildly increased Patient EH, Twin A: Only mildly increased NT (2.6mm) NT (2.6mm)
mildly increased riskmildly increased risk
Recommend Recommend ““quadruple testquadruple test””
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1818
Other US Other US ““soft markerssoft markers””
Frequently found among normal fetuses; Frequently found among normal fetuses; should not be used in isolation for Down should not be used in isolation for Down screeningscreening
Useful in combination with serum screening Useful in combination with serum screening and NT to modify riskand NT to modify risk
---- Shortened Shortened humerushumerus/femur/femur---- HyperechoicHyperechoic bowelbowel---- HypoplasticHypoplastic nasal bonenasal bone---- EndocardialEndocardial cushion defectcushion defect---- PyelectasisPyelectasis
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
1919
““Soft MarkersSoft Markers””
Nicolaides KH, Snijders RJM, Gosden CM, Berry C, Campbell S. Ultrasonographicallydetectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Lancet 1992;340:704–7
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2020
Patient LGPatient LG
Echogenic BowelPACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2121
Patient LGPatient LG
Short femurPACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2222
Patient LGPatient LG
Renal dilatationPACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2323
Normal 4Normal 4--Chamber HeartChamber Heart
www.thefetus.net
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2424
Patient SSPatient SS
PACS, BIDMC
Endocardial Cushion Defect
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2525
Patient SSPatient SS
Normal nasal bonePACS, BIDMC
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2626
Nasal Bone Nasal Bone HypoplasiaHypoplasia
Present in 62% of Present in 62% of trisomytrisomy 21 fetuses, 1.2% 21 fetuses, 1.2% chromosomally normal fetuseschromosomally normal fetuses
Increased NT
Absent nasal bone
http://www.femalepatient.com/html/arc/sel/sept02/article01.asp
Cicero, S et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21:15-18
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2727
Differential DiagnosisDifferential Diagnosis
SmithSmith--LemliLemli--OptizOptiz syndromesyndrome
MeckelMeckel syndromesyndrome
IniencephalyIniencephaly
CardiosplenicCardiosplenic syndromessyndromes
TORCH infectionsTORCH infections
Normal pregnancyNormal pregnancy
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2828
Integrated screeningIntegrated screening
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
2929
Integrated ScreeningIntegrated Screening
KH Nicolaides, NJ Sebire, RJM Snijders for www.thefetus.net
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3030
Patient EHPatient EH
Age = 35 Age = 35
1:2741:274
Increased NT Increased NT
1:151:15
Advise quadruple serum screenAmniocentesis/CVS
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3131
Patient LGPatient LG
Age = 40 Age = 40
1:741:74
EchogenicEchogenic bowel bowel
1:131:13
+Short femur +Short femur
1:4.51:4.5
Amniocentesis/CVS
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3232
Patient SSPatient SS
Age = 28 Age = 28
1:8551:855
EndocardialEndocardial cushion defect cushion defect
1:34.51:34.5
Advise quadruple serum screenAmniocentesis/CVS
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3333
ACOG Recommendations ACOG Recommendations (2001)(2001)
““A combination of one major or two minor A combination of one major or two minor ultrasound markers of Down syndrome ultrasound markers of Down syndrome substantially increases risk and warrants substantially increases risk and warrants further counseling regarding invasive further counseling regarding invasive testingtesting””
““The use of The use of ultrasonographicultrasonographic screening for screening for Down syndrome in highDown syndrome in high--risk women (risk women (egeg women age 35 years and older) to avoid women age 35 years and older) to avoid invasive testing should be limited to invasive testing should be limited to specialized centersspecialized centers””
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3434
SummarySummary
The challenge of screening for Down The challenge of screening for Down syndrome is one of risksyndrome is one of risk--assessmentassessment
UltrasonographicUltrasonographic markers such as NT can markers such as NT can significantly alter a patientsignificantly alter a patient’’s risk assessments risk assessment
Integrated screening Integrated screening ---- US combined with US combined with maternal age and serum screening maternal age and serum screening ---- provides a sensitive and specific screen for provides a sensitive and specific screen for Down syndromeDown syndrome
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3535
ReferencesReferences
BencerrafBencerraf, B. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000 Jun; , B. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000 Jun; 15(6):45115(6):451
Benacerraf, B. Prenatal Diagnosis 2002; 22: 798Benacerraf, B. Prenatal Diagnosis 2002; 22: 798--801801
BindraBindra R, et al. R, et al. ClinClin ObstetObstet GynecolGynecol 2002 Sep; 45(3):6612002 Sep; 45(3):661--670670
CanickCanick, JA., et al. , JA., et al. ““First Trimester Screening for Down SyndromeFirst Trimester Screening for Down Syndrome”” on on www.uptodate.comwww.uptodate.com
CuckleCuckle, HS, et al. British Journal of Obstetrics and , HS, et al. British Journal of Obstetrics and GynaecologyGynaecology 1987; 94:3871987; 94:387
CuckleCuckle, H. , H. CurrCurr OpinOpin ObstetObstet GynecolGynecol 2001 Apr; 13(2):1752001 Apr; 13(2):175--181181
HaakHaak, MC, et al. Human Reproduction Update 2003; 9(2):175, MC, et al. Human Reproduction Update 2003; 9(2):175--184184
HobbinsHobbins, JC et al. J Ultrasound Med 2001 Jun; 20(6):269, JC et al. J Ultrasound Med 2001 Jun; 20(6):269--7272
Jameson, LJ HarrisonJameson, LJ Harrison’’s Textbook of Internal Medicine.s Textbook of Internal Medicine.
Nyberg, DA et al. Ultrasound Nyberg, DA et al. Ultrasound ObstetObstet GynecolGynecol 1998;12:81998;12:8--1414
Nyberg, DA et al. J Ultrasound Med 2001 Jun; 20(6):665Nyberg, DA et al. J Ultrasound Med 2001 Jun; 20(6):665--7474
SnijdersSnijders R, et al. R, et al. CurrCurr OpinOpin ObstetObstet GynecolGynecol 2002 Dec; 14(6):5772002 Dec; 14(6):577--8585
Joshua U. Klein, HMS IIIGillian Lieberman, MD
3636
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
Larry Larry BarbarasBarbaras, our Webmaster, our Webmaster
David QuinlanDavid Quinlan
Pamela Pamela LepkowskiLepkowski
Michelle Swire, MDMichelle Swire, MD
Gillian Lieberman, MDGillian Lieberman, MD