umalusi moderation & release of the 2010 standardisation decisions national consultative forum...
TRANSCRIPT
Umalusi Moderation & Release of the 2010 Standardisation
Decisions
National Consultative Forum Meeting07 May 2011
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS?
Context, principles, approaches and processes
Reasons for Disclosure• Unprecedented interest in the role of
Umalusi• Request: Access to Information• Uninformed comments• Credibility of the NSC• Credibility of Umalusi
Legal Mandate• Chapter 2A of GENFETQA Act 58 of 2001 (as
amended in 2008)
Section17 of the GENFETQA Act(1) The Council must assure the quality of assessment at exit points
(2)(a) The Council must develop policy for the accreditation of assessment bodies other than departments of education and must submit it to the Minister for approval
(b) The Minister must make regulations in which the policy for accreditation is set out
(c) The Council must accredit an assessment body in accordance with the regulations contemplated in paragraph (b)
(3) The Council must perform the external moderation of assessment of all assessment bodies and education institutions
(4) The Council may adjust raw marks during the standardisation process.
Section17 of the GENFETQA Act(5) The Council must, with the concurrence of the Director-General and
after consultation with the relevant assessment body or education
institution, approve the publication of the results of learners if the
Council is satisfied that the assessment body or education institution
has—
(i) conducted the assessment free from any irregularity that may
jeopardise the integrity of the assessment or its outcomes;
(ii) complied with the requirements prescribed by the Council for
conducting assessments;
(iii) applied the standards prescribed by the Council which a learner is
required to comply with in order to obtain a certificate; and
(iv) complied with every other condition determined by the Council.
(6) The Council must issue certificates to learners who have achieved qualifications or part qualifications
Framework for QA of Learner Achievement Based on established and existing practices in
assessment for certification
• Prescribed components of External assessment (examinations) and Site based/ internal / continuous assessment
• Use of systems, processes, and procedures to evaluate, inspect, monitor and report on examination systems, processes and procedures of public and private assessment bodies.
Framework for Quality Assurance of Assessment Evaluation and /or accreditation of assessment bodies
Periodic inspection of assessment systems
Ongoing monitoring of assessment systems
Quality assurance of external examinations through:
Moderation of examination question papers
Monitoring and moderation of SBA
Monitoring the “State of readiness
Monitoring the conduct of examinations
Moderation of marking
Standardization of assessment outcomes
Approval of Results• Compliance with minimum requirements
• Shift from Moderation to Verification (Moderation for verification)
• Emphasis on Assessment Body reports The monitoring of the conduct of examinations and the
moderation of marking as well as the monitoring of the implementation of internal assessment and the moderation of internal assessment is undertaken by Umalusi to verify the veracity of the assessment body reports in respect of these process.
• Broadened definition of irregularities (including assessment system processes)
Why Umalusi standardises results, and how
• Provision of GENFETQA – Council may adjust raw marks.
• International practice – large scale assessment systems
• Standardisation – process used to mitigate the effect of factors other than learners knowledge and aptitude on the learners performance.
• Sources of variability – difficulty in question paper, undetected errors, learner interpretation of questions
Objectives for Standardisation1) To ensure that a cohort of learners is not
advantaged or disadvantaged by extraneous factors other than their knowledge of the subject, abilities and their aptitude.
2) To achieve comparability and consistency from one year to the next.
Why Umalusi standardises results, and how
• Assumptions – for large populations the distribution of aptitude and intelligence does not change appreciably
• Process of standardisation
Moderation of question papers
Review of learner performance against historical performance of candidates in each subject.
Historical average (norm) constructed using past 3 to 5 years data.
Pairs analyses provides further comparisons of raw means
Statistical moderation of Internal assessment
Why Umalusi standardises results, and how
• Qualitative input meetings
Reports (moderator, Chief marker and Internal Moderator)
Umalusi research (maintaining standards &post exam analysis)
• Responsibility of Assessment Standards Committee
Committee of Council
Responsible for setting and maintaining standards
• Observers (SAQA, HESA, Teacher Unions)
Process for Standardisation• Continuation of JMB and SAFCERT model
• Assessment Standards Committee
• Qualitative Reports
• Pre-standardisation and Standardisation meetings.
• Standardisation booklets (data) – subject raw mark distributions (external written component only) of entire cohort.
• Subjects are standardised individually, in a linear and non- iterative manner
General principles applied in the standardisation of examination marks
1. In general no adjustment should exceed 10% or the historical average.
2. Adjustments in excess of 10% could be considered at the upper end to increase the number of distinctions in a subject.
3. In the case of the individual candidate, the adjustment effected should not exceed 50%of the raw mark obtained by the candidate.
4. If the distribution of the raw marks is below the historical average, the marks may be adjusted upwards subject to the limitations.
General principles applied in the standardisation of examination marks (cont.)
5. If the distribution of the raw marks is above the historical average, the marks may be adjusted downwards subject to the limitations.
6. The computer adjusted mark is calculated based on these principles.
7. For those subjects with a practical component of 50%, raw marks could be accepted.
8. Umalusi however retains the right to amend these principles where and when deemed to be necessary based on sound educational principles.
Main instruments of standardisation
1.Historical average (HA) of raw scores over 3-5 years
2. Distribution of raw and adjusted marks in 10% intervals
3. Graph plot showing cumulative percentage of candidates at each mark
4. Raw mark distribution including the number and cumulative percentage of candidates at each raw mark
Main instruments of standardisation
5. Pairs analyses
6. Qualitative inputs: examiners’, moderators’ and examining bodies’ reports.
7. Qualitative and quantitative inputs: Umalusi’s ‘research group’.
Guiding Principles of Standardisation
1. Apply both positive and negative adjustments
2. No adjustments of more than 10% in either direction
3. Positive adjustments should generally not push the results above the HA (norm)
4. Marks that are well beyond the HA/norm should be adjusted downwards, but not necessarily as far as the norm
Guiding Principles of Standardisation
5. Raw marks which are close to the norm should not be adjusted
6. Take account of reports by examiners, moderators and research group
7. Any adjustment – no change in rank order 8. Small subjects generally not adjusted - raw
Specific issues / debates• Does Umalusi meet with government and look at the
pass rates on raw exam marks?
• Does Umalusi adjust marks to achieve a particular pass rate?
• Is Umalusi subjected to political pressure to achieve a particular pass rate?
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS?
STANDARDISATION DECISIONS
ERCO NSC 2010
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Accounting 0 at 0 scale to +18 at 72, block 18 at 222 and scale to 0 at 300
Afrikaans First Additional Language RawAfrikaans Home Language RawAgricultural Management Practice RawAgricultural Science RawBusiness Studies Raw
Civil Technology (DBE)
0 at 0; scale to -15 at 30, scale to -8 at 248, scale to 0 at 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTComputer Application Tech. Raw
Consumer Studies (DBE)
0 at 0, scale to +4 at 8, block +4 from 8 to 296, scale to 0 at 300
Dramatic Arts(DBE) Raw
Economics Raw
Electrical Technology RawEngineering Graphics and Design RawEnglish First Additional Lang.
0 at 0, scale to +6 at 234 and scale back to 0 to 300
English Home Language0 at 0 , scale up to +9 at 111, scale down to 0 at 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTFrench 2nd Additional Language (IEB)
0 at 0 , +20 at 70 scale back to 0 at 300
Geography (DBE)
0 at 0, scale to +8 at 41, block +8 at 86 ; scale to 0 at 154, and then raw.
History (DBE) RawHospitality Studies RawInformation Technology (DBE) RawIsiZulu First Additional (DBE) RawLife Orientation Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTLife Sciences Raw
Mathematics
0 at 0, scale to +27 at 63, scale to +12 at 228 and scale to 0 at 300
Mathematical Literacy RawMathematics P3 RawMechanical Technology (DBE) Raw
Physical Science
0 at 0, scale to +12 at 78 and scale to +2 at 238 and 0 at 300
Portuguese 1st Additional Language (IEB) Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Religion Studies RawSesotho 1st Additional Language (DBE) Raw
Tourism Raw
Visual Arts (DBE) Raw
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS?
STANDARDISATION DECISIONS
IEB NSC 2010
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Accounting0 at 90 scale to at -7 to 247; Scale back to 0 at 300
Afrikaans First Additional Language
0 at 0, scale to +6 at 84, block +6 from 84 to 234, scale down to 0 at 300
Afrikaans Home Language Raw
Business Studies
0 at 0, scale up +6 at 84, scale to +9 at 231, scale back to 0 at 300
Computer Application Technology Raw
Consumer Studies Raw
Design Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Dramatic Arts0 at 200 scale -4 at 244 and scale back to 0 at 300
Economics Raw
Engineering Graphics and Design
0 at 0 + 12 at 78 scale to 0 at 200, scale to -10 at 250, scale back to 0 at 300
English First Additional Lang Raw
English Home Language Raw
Geography Raw
History Raw
Information Technology Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTIsiZulu First Additional Language Raw
Life Orientation Raw
Life Sciences Raw
Mathematical Literacy
0 at 0 to -30 at 63, block -30 from 63 to 281, scale back to 0 at 300
Mathematics
0 at 0 to +6 at 105, block +6 from 105 to 144, scale back to 0 at 300
Mathematics P3 Raw
Physical Science
0 at 90 scale to +6 at 144, block of +6 from 144 to 234, scale back to 0 at 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Tourism Raw
Visual Arts0 at 200 + 2 at 238, scale back to 0 at 300
Dance Studies Raw
Hospitality Studies Raw
Music RawSepedi First Additional Language RawSesotho First Additional Language RawSetswana First Additional Language Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTSiswati First Additional Language Raw
Siswati Home Language RawIsiXhosa First Additional language Raw
IsiZulu Home Language Raw
Arabic 2nd Additional Lang0 at 0, scale to +20 at 70 scale back to 0 at 300
French 2nd Additional Lang0 at 0, scale to +20 at 70 scale back to 0 at 300
German Home Language RawGerman 2nd Additional Language
0 at 200,scale to -7 at 247, scale back to 0 at 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTGujurati 2nd Additional Lang RawHebrew 2nd Additional Lang
0 at 200, scale to -7 at 247, scale to 0 at 300
Hindi 2nd Additional Lang Raw
Italian 2nd Additional Lang Raw
Latin 2nd Additional Lang RawModern Greek 2nd Additional Lang RawPortuguese 1st Additional Lang RawPortuguese 2nd Additional Lang Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTSpanish 2nd Additional Lang RawTamil 2nd Additional Lang RawTelegu 2nd Additional RawUrdu Home Language Raw
Advanced Programme Mathematics
0 at 0, scale to +15 at 150, block +15 to 240, scale to 0 at 300
Equine Studies Raw
Sport and Exercise Science
0 at 0, scale to +15 at 30, block +15 at 200, scale to 0 at 300
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE NSC RESULTS?
STANDARDISATION DECISIONS
DBE NSC 2010
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Accounting0 at 0, scale to +23 at 67, scale to +6 at 234, scale to 0 at 300
Afrikaans FAL Raw
Afrikaans HL Raw
Afrikaans SAL Raw
Agricultural Management Practice
Raw
Agricultural Science
0 at 0, scale to -9 at 18, block -9 from 18 to 220, scale down to 0 at 240 and raw to 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Agricultural Technology Raw
Business Studies Raw
Civil Technology 0 at 0; scale to -15 at 30, scale to -8 at 248, scale to 0 at 300
Computer Application Tech Raw
Consumer Studies0 at 0, scale to +4 at 8, block +4 from 8 to 296, scale to 0 at 300
Dance Studies Raw
Design Raw
Dramatic Arts Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Economics Raw
Electrical Technology0 at 0, scale -6 at 46, block -6 to 226, scale to 0 at 240 and raw up to 300
Engineering Graphics and Design
Raw
English HL0 at 0, scale to +3 at 117, scale back to 0 at 171, thereafter raw to 300
English First Additional Lang FAL
0 at 0, scale to +3 at 6, block +3 from 6 to 297, scale to 0 at 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENTEnglish Second Additional Lang
Raw
Geography
0 at 0, scale to +8 at 41, block +8 at 86 ; scale to 0 at 154, and then raw to 300.
History Raw
Hospitality Studies RawInformation Technology Raw
IsiNdebele HL0 at 0, scale to -6 at 12, block of -6 from 12 to 300
IsiZulu HL0 at 0, scale to -6 at 12, block of -6 from 12 to 300
IsiZulu FAL Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
IsiZulu SAL Raw
IsiXhosa HL Raw
IsiXhosa FAL0 at 0, scale to -6 at 12, block of -6 from 12 to 300
IsiXhosa SAL Raw
Life Orientation Raw
Life Sciences0 at 0 ; scale to -9 at 23; block -9 from 23 to 286 and scale down to 0 to 300
Mathematics 0 at 0, scale to +22 at 68, scale down to +15 at 225, scale to 0 at 300
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Mathematical Literacy Raw
Mathematics P3 Raw
Mechanical Technology Raw
Music Raw
Physical Science Raw
Religion Studies0 at 0 scale to -12 at 24; block -12 to 291 and scale down to 0 at 300
Sepedi HL Raw
Sepedi FAL Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Sesotho HL 0 at 210, scale to +4 at 236, scale down to 0 at 300
Sesotho FAL Raw
Sesotho SAL Raw
Setswana HLRaw up to 210; scale to +7 at 233; scale to 0 at 300
Setswana FAL Raw
Setswana SAL Raw
Siswati HL0 at 0, scale to -6 at 12, block of -6 from 12 to 300
Siswati FAL Raw
SUBJECT ADJUSTMENT
Tshivenda HL 0 at 210 scale to +7 at 233 and scale to 0 at 300
Tshivenda FAL Raw
Tourism Raw
Visual Arts Raw
Xitsonga HL0 at 120 scale to -6 at 148 and block of -6 to 272 and scale to 0 at 300
Xitsonga FAL Raw
Nautical Science Raw
Maritime Economics Raw