U.N. Human Rights Council

Report of the Special Rapporteur on the

promotion and protection of the right to freedom

of opinion and expression

Protecting the human right to freedom of expression

I.V. Restriction of Content on the Internet

Summary

• Any restriction to the right to freedom of expressionmust meet the strict criteria under international human rights law.

Chapter IV frames a number of ways in which States are progressively censoring information on line.

We will review control mechanisms which interferes with the right to freedom of expression.

Arbitrary blocking or filtering of content• Blocking refers to measures taken to

prevent content from reaching an end user.

– i.e. YouTube: Turkey, Thailand, and Viet Nam are examples of countries where YouTube is being blocked for access (http://www.banana-vpn.com/blocked-

countries.htm).

Arbitrary blocking or filtering of contentStates’ use of blocking or

filtering technologies is frequently in violation of their obligation to guarantee the right to freedom of expression.

Arbitrary blocking or filtering of contentJust in time blocking is used

to prevent users from accessing or disseminating information at key political moments such as elections.

Social network platforms such as Twitter and Facebook are blocked.

Criminalization of legitimate expression

The types of action taken by States to limit the dissemination of content online not only include measures to prevent information from reaching the end-user, but also direct targeting of those who seek, receive and impart politically sensitive information via the Internet.

Criminalization of legitimate expression

Physically silencing criticism or dissent through arbitrary arrests and detention, enforced disappearance, harassment and intimidation is an old phenomenon, and also applies to Internet users

Criminalization of legitimate expression

Such actions are often aimed not only to silence legitimate expression, but also to intimi-

date a population to push its members towards self-censorship.

There is concern that legitimate expression is being criminalized in violation of existing laws or new laws being created.

Criminalization of legitimate expression

One clear example of criminalizing legitimate expression is the imprisonment of bloggers around the world.

According to Freedomhouse, Vietnam is listed among the ten more repressive countries for bloggers (http://www.freedomhouse.org/images/File/FotN/Vietnam2011.pdf).

Imposition of intermediary liability

Is a distinguished feature of the Internet in the way in which information is transmitted on intermediaries who provide services and platforms to open the doors of communication between third parties either by giving access to, accommodating, or sending and indexing information.

Imposition of intermediary liability

Intermediary liability is decreed through privacy and data protection laws.

A court in Italy convicted three Google executives for violations of the Italian data protection code by way of the intermediary that permitted a video to be displayed showing cruelty to a disabled teenager through Google video service.

Disconnecting users from Internet access, including on the basis of violations of intellectual property rights law

There are states that have initiated measures to cut off access to the internet entirely. There are concerns over the discussions centering around an “on/off” control over internet traffic.

Cyber-attacks

Cyber-attacks can cripple or sabotage the functioning of a computer based system and includes hacking into programs or computer networks. Cyber-attacks cause website crashes and as a result these websites are not accessible. Often these attacks occur during political moments.

Inadequate protection of the right to privacy and data protection

The internet has technology through which the state and private sectors can monitor and collect data concerning users’ communications and activities on the internet. This is concern to the internet users’ right to privacy.

 

The internet is a special

communications medium and we need

promotion and protection of the

right to freedom of opinion and expression.