understanding critical elements of e-books: the social reading experience of sharing bookmarks and...

Understanding Critical Elements of E-books: The Social Reading Experience of

Sharing Bookmarks and Annotations

September 12, 2012

Speakers: Todd Carpenter, Rob Sanderson, Dan Whaley

http://www.niso.org/news/events/2012/nisowebinars/ebooks_social_reading/

• INSERT EACH OF THE SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS, IN THE ORDER THEY ARE LISTED ON THE WEBSITE

2

Social Reading Experience of Sharing Bookmarks and AnnotationsSeptember 12th 2012, NISO Webinar

29

Annotating the Web with W3C Open Annotations

Robert Sanderson [email protected] [email protected] Los Alamos National Laboratory @azaroth42 (W3C Open Annotation Co-Chair)

http://www.openannotation.org/

http://www.w3c.org/community/openannotation

This research was funded, in part, by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.


30

Open Annotation

• Communities• Annotation, E-Books and the Web

• Core Open Annotation Model• Extended Model: Specific Resources

• The Road Ahead


31

Open Annotation and the W3C

• Open Annotation Collaboration (focus: humanities, web)• LANL, UIUC, Queensland, MITH, plus others

• Annotation Ontology (focus: science)• Harvard, Manchester, plus others

• Models merged November 2011-March 2012• Basis of W3C Open Annotation Community Group• Next f2f meeting: September 18-19, Chicago • http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation

• Open to all• Please join in the discussion!

http://www.w3c.org/community/openannotation


32

Social, Digital Annotation

• NISO Working Group on Digital Annotation• Apple, Adobe, IDPF, EBSCO, Sony, hypothes.is, …

• 3 Meetings (New York, San Franciso, Frankfurt)

• Introduced and reinforced several requirements:• Need to be able to specify how to render the annotation• Issues with text quoting and book reconstruction• Challenges with text segments:

• Robustness in the face of change• Precision of the selection


33

Further Community

• International Image Interoperability Framework• Stanford, Oxford, Cornell, BL, BNF, KB,

Natl. Library of Norway, UK Natl. Archives, ArtStor, …

• Digital Medieval Manuscript Interoperability Forum• As IIIF, plus Drew, St Louis, Ghent, Meertens Institute, …

• Close Ties to:• W3C Provenance WG• schema.org• NLP Interchange Format group


34

E-Books and the Web

• Web formats are E-Book formats• Epub is just HTML5• Apps/Sites and E-Books are moving closer together

• E-Books are not just Text!• Video or audio comments• … about embedded images, 3-d models

• Multiple targets for a single annotation• Compare/Contrast, grouping, …

• Fine grained region of interest is crucial• Particular word in text, letter depicted in image …


35

Basic Model

An RDF Document

The Comment

What The Comment is

About

http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/


36

Basic Model


37

Annotation Types

Class Description

Bookmark Marker at (a point in) a resource

Change Request for modification

Classification Assignment of a class

Comment Commentary or Review

Description Description of, rather than about target

Highlight Highlighted (section of a) resource

Link Relationship of unspecified semantics

Moderation Assignment of value or quality

Question Question about target

Reference Citation or reference pointer for target

Reply Response to previous statement

Tag A tag on target resource, often textual


38

Annotation Types


39

Multiple Targets


40

Further Specification of Resources

Specific Body and Specific Target resources identify the region of interest, and/or the state of the resource.

Need to be able to describe the state of the resource, the segment of interest, and potentially styling hints for how to render it.

We introduce two Specifiers:

Selector Describes how to select segment

State Describes how to retrieve representation

(Where did Style go? It’s moving to the Annotation in next draft)


41

Specific Target


42

Offset Text Selector


43

Quotation Text Selector


44

Fragment Selector


45

Further Features

• Embedding resources • Embedding body, specifiers, styles for transport

• Semantic and Data Annotations• Semantic tags, annotating data, data as commentary

• Provenance of Annotation• Versioning• Equivalence• Archiving• Annotator / Generator distinction


46

The Road Ahead

• September face to face• Resolve open questions

• October-December• Revised Draft

• 2013• Final Draft• Look at moving to W3C Working Group structure• Towards standards track / recommendation status


47

Thank You

Robert Sanderson [email protected] [email protected] @azaroth42

Web: http://www.openannotation.org/ http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/ http://www.shared-canvas.org/

Slides: http://www.slideshare.net/azaroth42/niso-annotation-webinar

Overview

NISO Webinar on Bookmarking and Annotation

September 13, 2012

Dan [email protected]

http://bit.ly/niso-hypothesis

mailto:[email protected]

”

Gutenberg invented the [modern] printing press, and so what was printed could now be distributed and affect otherwise docile citizens or subjects. It therefore became important to regulate that which was set before the public.

“Spier 2002 – The history of the peer review process

1913 Victoria Carbon Copy Machine

1960 Haloid Xerox 914

You are here

To transform how we know what’s credible in the world around us by

enabling the crowdsourced peer-review

of information everywhere.

Our Mission

Why don’t we have this yet?

http://bit.ly/existingannotation

Why don’t we have this yet?• No effective peer-review model, if

any.• Not annotation based—i.e. many

don’t work on subparts of documents.

• No way to link into passages and annotations.

• Poor cold start strategies.• Not standards based.• Not open source.• Not non-profit in structure.

What is Hypothes.is?

1. Open source. Free. (github.com/hypothesis)– Leverages OKFN annotator work

2. Non-profit.3. Enabling broad annotation of the world’s

documents and other media.4. Using a pseudonymous, occasionally

anonymous identity model.5. With an emergent & domain sensitive

reputation model.6. Coordinating with others to achieve long-term

archiving.7. Committed to interoperability and data

portability

FY 2012-2013 Funding

$245k*

*includes matching gift and others

$520k +$20k workshop

A few Grand Challenges

1. Effective reputation model (signal v noise) that makes efficient use of experts (metamoderation).

2. Robust inter and intra-document anchors

3. Works well across the web and with a diversity of browsers, tools, etc.

4. Great UI5. Solving the cold start

Timeline

2012 2013

Annotation / Anchoring / UI

Cold start

Reputation model / Peer selection

now

Scale

Annotation Peer-review

+

Annotation

Anchors• Inter-document

– How to create robust anchors that survive document changes in structure and content

– Strategies for calculating confidence metrics and graceful failure modes

• Intra-document1. Different document formats (HTML / PDF / Text)

should show same annotations (related to Canonical URL issue)

2. Handling pagination vs. single page (related to reflowable text)

3. Pure content anchoring (annotating Hamlet, or the King James bible wherever it is)?

Blog “B”Document “A”

Coming soon

Blog “B”

17m 32s

Blog “B”


ChallengeSupportNeutral commentPose a questionAnswer a question

Request expert reviewSupply a correctionJokeProvide a referencePoint to similar articles

Document “A”

Peer-review

It doesn’t have to be complicated

“I just say something, and they say ‘yeah, but have you considered X?’

And I say ‘Huh. Good point.’ ”

Ted Underwood / UIUC – Dept of English commenting on the objectives of a good open peer-review model

The Reputation Modeling Workshop

• Held Feb 22-24, 2012 in San Francisco

• Funded by $20K grant from the Sloan Foundation’s Digital Information Technology area

• Purpose: To bring together leading experts in reputation modeling to think through design challenges of enabling global annotation

• Over 50 attendees including:– Erik Martin / Reddit, GM– Jeff Atwood / Stackoverflow, Cofounder– Rob Sanderson / LANL– Radu Jurca / Google (Zurich)– Steven Tadelis / eBay– Dario Taborelli / Wikipedia– Roger MacDonald / Internet Archive– Paul Resnick / U Michigan– Jennifer Lin / PLoS– Craig Newmark / Craigslist

What we learned

• The identity model, and particularly how expensive new identities are, is central to the dynamics of the reputation model.

• We need to balance direct participation w/ an objective control that should be semi-random and probably blind.

• It needs to be fun.

Signal to Noise

Obvious trolls

Identity

Voice

SQUELCH

Noise floor

Meta-moderation

Spam

Signal

Noise

VOLUME

Design choices

• Pseudonymous identity, potentially gated through two factor authentication (i.e. SMS message).

• Threaded, direct reply approach to moderation where sentiment and score propagate up through threads

• A meta-moderated loop controls reputation• Meta-moderation is blind and semi-random• Meta-moderators are chosen by their

reputation in the associated area. By domain proximity.

• Users can annotate for personal use, in either public or private groups, or in a global public channel.

• Standard social kit– following others, sharing, etc.

Two moderation loopsModeration Meta-moderation

Opportunities Come through replies in threads

Come via an activity stream

Participants Involves people that are already at the site

Blends people between sites based on expertise

Reputation … Is leveraged Is determined

Interaction Model

Direct response in threads

Blind, random

Qualifications Anyone who has passed initial screen

Only people above a certain reputation threshold

Economics

Monetary Policy

Oceanography

Climate Modeling

Human Rights

Quantum Teleportation

LHCPhysics

Expert matching through domain proximity

Economics

Monetary Policy

Oceanography

Climate Modeling

Human Rights

Quantum Teleportation

LHCPhysics

Meta-moderation matching through domain proximity

Plug-ins

URL

Deep links / embeds

Website

API

A diversity of interfaces

http://hpt.is/TzLv

Internet Archive partnership

• Will store annotations permanently• Domain assignment agreement• Will cache reference copies of annotated

pages permanently (for versioning)– Exploring same relationship w/ Common Crawl

• Wants to enable annotation on their – Wayback machine (version history of internet)– Books– New video project

– Early, active & enthusiastic OA participant

Use case examples + formats• Gov’t documents

– Legislation, regulations, FOMC minutes

• Scientific papers– Post-publication review

• Terms of service, Privacy policies, EULAs– Facebook, Yahoo, OnStar, etc

• News / Blogs• Data (scientific, public, industrial,

etc)• Corporate documents

– 10K, 10Q, analyst call minutes

• General content

• HTML• PDF• EPUB• Video• Audio• Images• Manuscripts• Data• Software• Spreadsheets & other

application-specific document formats

Selection of launch domains*• Stable (easy to anchor to)• Longevity (at least months)• Single sources (canonical URLs)• In the public interest • Trending• Content is not highly subjective• No commenting system already• Large pool of quality annotators• No paywalls• Annotation makes a difference

* aka Solving for the Cold Start

Use case examples

• Gov’t documents– Legislation, regulations, FOMC minutes

• Scientific papers– Post-publication review (arxiv, PLoS)

• Terms of service, Privacy policies, EULAs– Facebook, Yahoo, OnStar, etc

• News / Blogs• Corporate documents

– 10K, 10Q, analyst call minutes

• General content– Books, PDFs, video, etc

Thanks!

understanding critical elements of e-books: the social reading experience of sharing bookmarks and...

Technology

niso webinar

digital annotation niso

annotation issues

w3c open annotations

digital annotation apple

annotation ontology

web web formats

text quoting