uni sci- %28evaluation form-2013%29

7/26/2019 Uni Sci- %28Evaluation Form-2013%29

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/uni-sci-28evaluation-form-201329 1/6

UNIVERSITAS SCIENTIARUM

Themes covered: The journal will accept unpublished papers on any subject of natural, physical

or exact sciences.www.javeriana.edu.co/scientiarum/web

Categories of manuscripts:Universitas Scientiarum publishes original article, short communications(notes), review (meta-analysis, review of methods or concepts), mini-reviews, and methods article.https://docs.google.com/fle/d/0B_IdlsctkRrxS!"#$%ackd&'"g/edit(usp)sharing

Target pubic: The journal is addressed to researchers and graduates students of natural,physical and exact sciences, and in general to all those who contribute toscientic nowledge.

MANUSCRI!T EVA"UATI#N $#RM

Manuscript Entite:Manuscript Code:I% #vera assessment:

The manuscript is &seect one ' pease use an( coor):

A% !cceptable in its present form or after minor corrections annotated inthe comments section.

*% !cceptable once extensive revisions annotated in the commentssection are done" # am willing to re $ referee the manuscript.

C% %ay become acceptable if suggested data or experiments areprovided and&or revisions are done" re'uires rewriting and resubmitting" #am willing to re $ referee the manuscript.

+% ejection with the possibility to re-submit an improved version.

E% nacceptable (poor&no originality). *lease include reasons in thecomments section.

evista Universitas Scientiarum

ISSN 0122-7483 (versión impresa) ISSN 2027-1352 (versión en línea)

Carrera 7 No. 43-82 Edifcio CARLOS ORTÍZ Oc. 627 Tel-Fax: 320 83 20 Ext. 4070E-mail: [email protected]

+ page http&&www.javeriana.edu.co&facultades&ciencias &universitas&index.htmogot/, 0.1., 1olombia 2ur !m3rica

4

http://www.javeriana.edu.co/scientiarum/web

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.javeriana.edu.co/facultades/ciencias%20/universitas/index.htm

http://www.javeriana.edu.co/scientiarum/web





!riorit( for pubication &seect one, use -):

.% 5ey manuscript666666666

/% #mportant manuscript (competent, new nowledge or insights)

6666666666

0% seful manuscript (competent but repeats existing

nowledge)6666666666

1% %anuscript not recommended 66666666666

Manuscript t(pe &Seect the most appropriate for the paper, use -)

7riginal article

666

2hort communication (! shortened version of this paper should be published as a

note) 666

eview

666

%ethods article

666

##. Comments to the Editor (they will not be disclosed to the authors)





8







III% Comments to the authors (include your comments here or in the

electronic version" you can follow the priority of comments you consider the

authors should address. *lease follow the manuscript sections order)

• Ma2or comments:

• Minor comments:





9







:ame2ignature0ate;iliations

Please feel free to ll the following gaps, if you consider it isnecessary (according to manuscript type), or you can use them as





<







guide lines to review the paper and to write the editor and authorletters.

IV% Speci3c assessment (answer 'uestions that are relevant to the type of

manuscript" :! = does not apply. #f considered necessary, please justify youranswer in the comments section)

4ES N# NA

4. 0oes the manuscript not been published previously> 666 666 666 8. 0oes the manuscript describe original wor>(#f not original, list references of previous publications)

666 666 666 9. 0oes the manuscript present new nowledge in the eld>

666 666 666

<. 0oes the manuscript have methodological or theoretical interest> 666 666 666 ?. #s the title clear and precise> 666 666

666 @. #s the abstract descriptive of contents>

666 666 666 A. #s the introduction clear> 0oes it provide the bacground of the wor>

666 666 666 B. !re the problem, 'uestion and&or hypothesis explicitly indicated>

666 666 666 C. !re there enough details presented in the %aterials and %ethods section>

666 666 666

4D. !re the variables measured with precision and using the latest techni'ues> 666 666 666 44. !re ade'uate data (sample siEe) and statistical analysis provided>

666 666 666 48. !re the gures and tables of suitable clarity and 'uality>

666 666 666 49. !re the titles of the tables and&or gures appropriate> 666

666 666 4<. !re the authorFs conclusions supported by the data>

666 666 666 4?. #s the discussion pertinent to the main theme of the paper>

666 666 666

4@. !re the claims and interpretations valid> 666 666 666





?







4A. 0o the authors propose new 'uestions&hypothesis for further studies> 666 666 666 4B. !re references provided ade'uate and cited correctly>

666 666 666

4C. !re the references up to date> 666 666 666 8D. 1ould the paper be improved by shortening it>

666 666 666 84. !re the organiEation, style and grammar satisfactory>

666 666 666 88. 1an the manuscript be read by subscribers from diGerent disciplines>

666 666 666





@





uni sci- %28evaluation form-2013%29

Documents