united states department of the interior water resources of the tulalip indian reservation… ·...

UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WATER RESOURCES OF THE TULALIP INDIAN RESERVATION,

WASHINGTON

By B. W. Drost

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS

OPEN-FILE REPORT 82-648

Prepared in cooperation with the

TULALIP TRIBAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Tacoma, Washington 1983

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JAMES G. WATT, Secretary

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Dallas L. Peck, Director

For additional write to:

information

District Chief U.S. Geological Survey, WRD 1201 Pacific Avenue - Suite 600 Tacoma, Washington 98402-4384

Copies of this report can be purchased from:

Open-File Services Section Western Distribution Branch

U.S. Geological Survey Box 25425, Federal Center Lakewood, Colorado 800225 (Telephone: (303) 234-5888)

CONTENTS

Page

Abstract 1Introduction 3

Purpose and scope 3Description of the area- 3Acknowledgments 6

Water resources 7The hydrologic cycle 7Precipitation 7Evapotranspi ration 10Direct runoff plus ground-water recharge 13Surface water 13

Tulalip Creek basin 21Mission Creek basin 22Quilceda Creek basin 23Lakes 24Water qual ity 28

Ground water 32Geology 32Aqui fers 40Existing ground-water development 42Water quality 43

Water budget 45Potential for further development 50

Surface water 50Ground water 51

References cited 55

m

ILLUSTRATIONS

(Plate in pocket)

PLATE 1. Map of Tulalip Indian Reservation, showing surface and ground- water data-collection sites, perennial reaches of streams, and principal areas of ground-water development.

Page

FIGURE 1. Map of Tulalip Indian Reservation, showing principalgeographic features 4

2. Graph showing population of the reservation from 1920-90 53. Diagrammatic sketch of the hydro!ogic cycle 8

4-11. Graphs showing:4. Precipitation during 1935-77 water years 95. Percentage of time various values of annual

precipitation were equaled or exceeded, 1935-77 water years 9

6. Average annual water balance 117. Annual evapotranspiration, 1935-77 water years 128. Percentage of time various values of annual

evapotranspiration were equaled or exceeded,1935-77 water years 12

9. Annual direct runoff plus ground-water recharge,1935-77 water years 14

10. Percentage of time that various values of annual direct runoff plus ground-water recharge were equaled or exceeded, 1935-77 water years 14

11. Mean monthly distribution of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and direct runoff plus ground-water recharge 1935-77 water years 15

12. Map showing generalized geology of the reservation 33 13-18. Schematic geologic section along lines:

13. A-A 1 3414. B-B 1 3515. c-C 1 3616. D-D 1 3717. E-E 1 3818. F-F ' 39

19. Graph showing relationship of direct runoff plus ground- water recharge to net ground-water recharge 47

20. Diagram showing water budget and flow system 4821. Graph showing relationships between direct runoff plus

ground-water recharge, surface-water discharge, and ground-water levels 49

22. Graph showing water-level fluctuations in the Tribal wellfield 54

IV

TABLES

Page

TABLE 1. Annual mean flows at selected sites from correlations, with a 50-percent probability of being less than indicated, and from streamflow records and from a water budget 17

2. Monthly mean flows from correlations at selected sites, May-October, with a 50-percent probability of being less than indicated 18

3. Low flows at selected sites for selected periods ofconsecutive days and probabilities of being less than indicated 19

4. Flood discharges at selected sites for selectedprobabilities of exceedence 20

5. Some physical data on lakes 256. Gage heights and water temperature of selected lakes 267. Coliform-bacteria concentrations in selected streams,

November 1974-March 1977 298. Average concentrations of nutrients under varying

streamflow conditions 319. Comparison of ground-water quality in the study area

with standards established by the Federal Safe DrinkingWater Act 44

10. Mean daily discharges at Mission and Tulalip Creekgaging stations during October 1974-September 1977 58

11. Daily maximum and minimum water temperatures at Mission and Tulalip Creek gaging stations during October 1974- September 1976 64

12. Discharges and water temperatures at periodic-measurementsites 72

13. Chemical quality of surface water from selected sites 7814. Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian

Reservation 8415. Records of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian

Reservation 13016. Water levels in selected wells 14117. Chemical quality of ground water from selected wells 148

WELL- AND AREA-LOCATION NUMBERING SYSTEM

The well and area-location numbers used in this report give the location according to the official rectangular public-land survey. For example, in well number 30/4-1OL2, the numbers preceding the hyphen indicate successively the township and range (T.30 N., R.4 E.) north and east of the Willamette base line and meridian, respectively. The first number following the hyphen indicates the section (sec. 10), and the letter (L) indicates the 40-acre subdivision of the section as shown in the sketch below. The last number is the sequence number of the well in the particular 40-acre tract. Thus, well 30/4-1OL2 is the second well listed in the NE£ of the SW& of sec. 10, T.30 N., R.4 E. An "s" following the sequence number indicates a spring.

R. W.

30/4-10L2

T.

30

N.

'

D

E

M^>

.X"

N

C

F

L *

P

B

G

K

Q

A

H

0

R

Section 10

Area-location numbers include only the township, range, and section numbers.

METRIC CONVERSIONS

Multiply

Feet (ft) --- - Miles- Acres --- Acre-feet (acre-ft)----- Cubic feet per second--- (ft3/s)

Gallons per minute --(gal/min)

Gallons per day (gal/d)- Gallons per minute per--

foot (gal/min/ft) Degrees Fahrenheit (°F)

0.30481.609

4047.01233.0

28.320.02832

0.06309

0.000044375 0.2096

0.5556, aftersubtracting32

To obtain

meters (m) kilometers (km) square meters (m^) cubic meters (m^) liters per second (L/s) cubic meters per second

(m3/s) liters per second (L/s)

liter per second (L/s) liters per second permeter (L/s/m)

degrees Celsius (°C)

National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929): A geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called "Mean Sea Level." NGVD of 1929 is referred to as sea level in this report.

WATER RESOURCES OF THE TULALIP INDIAN RESERVATION, WASHINGTON

By B. W. Drost

ABSTRACT

Water will play a significant role in the future development of the Tulalip Indian Reservation. Ground-water resources are sufficient to supply several times the 1978 population. Potential problems associated with increased ground-water development are saltwater encroachment in the coastal areas and septic-tank contamination of shallow aquifers. There are sufficient good-quality surface-water resources to allow for significant expansion of the tribe's fisheries activities.

The tribal well field is the only place where the ground-water system has been stressed, resulting in declining water levels (1.5 feet per year). The well field has a useful life of at least 15-20 years. This can be increased by drilling additional wells to expand the present well field.

Inflow of water to the reservation is in the form of precipitation (103 cubic feet per second, ft3/s), surface-water inflow (13 ft3/s), and ground-water inflow (4 ft^/s). Outflow is as evapotranspiration (62 ft3/s), surface-water outflow (40 ft3/s), and ground-water outflow (18 ft3/s). Total inflow and outflow are equal (120 ft^/s). 4

Ground water is generally suitable for domestic use without treatment, but a serious quality problem is the presence of coliform bacteria in some shallow wells. High values of turbidity and color and large concentrations of iron and manganese are common problems regarding the esthetic quality of the water. In a few places, large concentrations of chloride and dissolved solids indicate the possiblity of saltwater encroachment, but no ongoing trend has been identified.

Surface waters have been observed to contain undesirably high concentrations of total phosphorus and total and fecal-coliform bacteria, and to have temperatures too high for fish-rearing. The concentration of nutrients appears to be related to flow conditions. Nitrate and total nitrogen are greater in wet-season runoff than during low-flow periods, and total phosphorus shows an inverse relationship. Total phosphorus and ammonia concentrations are greatest in dry-season storm runoff. Generally, surface-water quality is adequate for fish-rearing and (with treatment) for public supply.

All of the known geologic units produce usable quantities of water in at least some areas. Only one unit is capable of supplying more than a single-household (from one 6-inch diameter well) at most places on the reservation. Median well depth in this unit is 130 feet and median specific capacity is 4.0 gallons per minute per foot. The water-bearing properties of only the upper 300 feet of the 1,600 feet of unconsolidated materials are well known.

In 1978, four major areas of ground-water development supplied about 3,700 people at an average rate of 122 gallons per day per person. Virtually all water used on the reservation came from wells.

The two major surface-water basins, Tulalip and Mission Creeks, have calculated median annual mean flows of 12.1 and 6.7 ft^/s, respectively. Estimated 7-day 5-percent low flows for the respective basins are 4.9 and 0.4 ft^/s. Estimated flood discharges for the same basins at an exceedance probability of 1-percent are 260 and 155 ft^/s, respectively.

INTRODUCTION

Water will play a significant role in the future development of the Tulalip Indian Reservation. The amount, character, and quality of development will greatly depend upon wise use of the available water resources. Aware of the importance of an ample supply of potable water, the Tulalip Tribal Board of Directors entered into a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey in 1974 to evaluate the reservation's water resources.

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of the investigation and report is to evaluate the water resources of the reservation in order to provide the information required for current management decisions, long-range planning, and development and protection of vital water resources.

This is the final report of the investigation. Earlier reports presented preliminary assessments of available ground- and surface-water data (Drost, 1977 and 1979) and of Ross Lake, one of eight lakes in the reservation (Dion, 1979). This report includes the data collected during the course of the study and an assessment of the potential for further development of the reservation's water resources.

Description of the Area

The Tulalip Indian Reservation is in west-central Snohomish County, Wash., north of Everett and west of Marysville (pi. 1). The reservation, which is about 34.5 square miles (mi^) in area, is bordered on the west and south by Port Susan and Possession Sound (fig. 1). The reservation's northern boundary is on the northern limit of township 30 and its eastern boundary coincides with the eastern right-of-way of Interstate Highway 5.

As of 1978, the total year-round population of the reservation was 3,987 (Gregg Selby, Snohomish County Planning Department, oral commun., 1978; see fig. 2). In addition, the reservation has an influx of about 1,600 residents each summer. Most of the population resides along the shoreline or along the eastern margin of the reservation. About 550 Indians live on the reservation, both tribal and non-tribal members.

The land within the reservation is largely undeveloped. As estimated from aerial photographs and topographic maps, 80 percent is forest, 10 percent is residential, 4 percent is agricultural, 3 percent is swamps and lakes, and 3 percent is tidal marsh.

FIGURE 1. Tulalip Indian Reservation, showing major roads, communities, streams, and lakes.

8000

6000

/ / /-I

o i < t

Q- O Q.

4000

2000

1920 1940 1960 1980

FIGURE 2. Population trend in the Tulalip Indian Reservation, 1920-78, and projections, 1978-90. Data through 1970 from U.S. Department of Commerce (1971); data for 1974 from N. Dobos, Snohomish County Planning Department (oral commun., 1975); data for 1977-90 from Gregg Selby, Snohomish County Planning Department (oral commun., 1978).

About 30 percent of the land within the reservation boundaries is owned by the Tulalip Tribe, about 10 percent is owned by individual tribal members, and about 60 percent is controlled by non-tribal members, of which two large tracts are controlled by industrial interests. The only existing industrial development is the Boeing Test Center (fig. 1 and pi. 1), which is on tribal land. Potential industrial sites on non-tribal land include the Glacier Park Co. property in the northeastern part of the reservation, proposed for a railroad yard, and Union Oil Co. land in the west-central part. The tribe-owned Ebey Slough area also is considered for industrial development. Agricultural activities on the reservation are confined basically to its eastern lowland margin and consist primarily of small herds (less than 20 head) of beef and dairy cattle.

All but about the eastern Ifc mi of the reservation is situated on a rolling plain of glacial deposits (Tulalip Plateau). Most of this plain is at least 200 ft above mean sea level, reaching altitudes of about 580 ft at the northern boundary of the reservation. The eastern 1£ mi of the reservation is part of an approximately 3-mi-wide trough that extends from Marysville on the south to the Stillaguamish River (about 5 mi north of the reservation) on the north. The trough reaches an altitude of about 100 ft in the northeastern corner of the reservation.

The principal streams draining the reservation are Tulalip Creek, Mission Creek, and tributaries to Quilceda Creek. The headwaters of Tulalip Creek, north of the reservation, are regulated to maintain the levels of Lakes Goodwin and Shoecraft. The stream channel at the outlet of Lake Shoecraft is dry during part of most summers. The approximate extents of perennial streams, based on data from October 1974 to September 1977, are shown in plate 1. Eight lakes, ranging in area from 1.3 to 20.4 acres, are on the reservation.

The weather stations nearest the reservation, which are in Everett (about Ifc mi south of the reservation) and Arlington (about 5 mi northeast of the reservation), provide data representative of the climate of the reservation. The average annual precipitation at the stations during 43 years of record (1935-77) was about 40 in. Almost 70 percent of the precipitation occurs during the period October-March. The average annual temperature is 50.5°F (10.3°C), and the monthly average temperatures range from 38.2°F (3.4°C) in January to 62.8°F (17.1°C) in July. (All climatic data are from the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1960 and 1965, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1977.)

Acknowledgments

This study was made in cooperation with the Tulalip Tribal Board of Directors. The Bureau of Indian Affairs participated in the planning of the study, and individual members of the Tulalip Tribe and other residents of the reservation were helpful in many ways during the field investigations. Well drillers Henry E. Deckmann and Robert E. Freeman provided numerous drillers' logs and other pertinent data. Representatives of the Indian Health Service provided information on the newly installed tribal well field. The consulting firm of Hammond, Collier, and Wade-Livingstone Associates, Inc., provided data on several test wells.

WATER RESOURCES

The Hydrologic Cycle

The hydrologic cycle describes the pattern of water movement as it circulates through the natural system. Precipitation as rain and snow is the immediate source of all freshwater. A part of this precipitation runs off rapidly to streams, and a part is evaporated directly back to the atmosphere from the ground and from lakes, streams, and plant surfaces. A part soaks into the soil where some is drawn up by plants and returns to the atmosphere by transpiration from their leaves; the remainder percolates downward to a zone of saturation to become ground water. In turn, ground water returns to the surface-water system by seepage to springs, lakes, streams, and marine waters.

Although most of the freshwater comes directly from rain or snow on the Tulalip Indian Reservation, some water enters the reservation as surface runoff and ground-water underflow from areas to the north. The hydrologic cycle on the reservation is diagrammatically illustrated in figure 3.

Precipitation

Precipitation was determined from data collected at the weather stations nearest the study area; Everett and Arlington. During the 1935-77 water years the average annual precipitation at the station was about 40 in., with a minimum of 32.9 in. in 1963 and a maximum of 56.6 in. in 1948 (fig. 4).

The probability that a particular amount of precipitation will occur in any single year can be estimated from figure 5. For example, the figure shows that only about 10 percent of the time will annual precipitation exceed 48 in., and that about 90 percent of the time it will exceed 32 in. These estimates of the probability of future precipitation shown in figure 5 are accurate only if the climatic factors in operation during the 43 years of record follow a similar pattern in the future.

Average monthly precipitation at Everett and Arlington is shown in figure 11. The figure shows a distinct wet season during October-March and a dry season during April-September. The average monthly precipitation is about 3.4 in., and monthly average precipitation ranges from 5.5 in. in December to 1.2 in. in July. The greatest monthly precipitation on record was 11.6 in. at Arlington in January 1971, and the least was 0.00 in. at Everett in July 1958.

Evaporation

EvaporationStreams and lakes)

5 > /Pe£cp/a T^S

Reservation boundary

FIGURE 3. Diagrammatic sketch of the hydrologic cycle.

1940 1950 1960 1970

FIGURE 4. Annual precipitation, 1935-77 water years (U.S. Weather Bureau, 1935-65; U.S. Department of Commerce, 1966-73; [U.S.] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1974-77).

ooUJmO

o_ i i o

55

50

45z: o

5 40

35

3010 20 3040506070

PERCENTAGE

80 90 95

FIGURE 5. Percentage of time various values of annual precipitation were equaled or exceeded, 1935-77 water years.

Evapotranspiration

Evapotranspiration refers to the transfer of water, in the form of vapor, from land areas and bodies of water to the atmosphere. In the study area, evapotranspiration occurs primarily as evaporation from vegetation and land surfaces that have been wetted by precipitation and from surface-water bodies, and as transpiration by vegetation of water derived from the unsaturated zone. Evapotranspiration also occurs directly from the ground-water reservoir, where it intersects or nearly intersects the land surface.

The amount of evapotranspi ration from an area depends primarily on solar radiation, air temperature, vegetation type, and the availability of water. No direct measurements of evapotranspiration from the study area are available, but reasonable estimates can be made using a modified Blaney-Criddle calculation (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1970). This method yields a value for potential evapotranspi ration the amount of water that would be evapotranspired if an unlimited source of water were available. However, an unlimited source of water does not exist in the study area.

In the study area, two different evapotranspiration regimes exist at different times: (1) wet periods, when precipitation is greater than potential evapotranspiration, during which the actual rate of evapotranspiration equals the potential rate, and (2) dry periods, during which potential evapotranspiration is greater than precipitation, and the actual rate of evapotranspiration is generally less than the potential rate. The actual rate during dry periods is considered equal to precipitation plus available soil moisture accumulated during previous wet periods, assuming no direct runoff. Assuming an average soil thickness of 3 ft as estimated by Anderson and others (1947), and assuming a water-holding capacity of 10 percent, the soil in the study area has the ability to store about 3.6 in. of water. Figure 6 shows the position of evapotranspiration within the hydrologic system: during wet periods (generally October-March), there is a surplus of water which is either stored in the soil (soil-moisture recharge) to remain available for evapotranspiration or is removed from the evapotranspiration environment as surface runoff or as recharge to the ground-water reservoir (water surplus).

During dry periods (generally April-September) there is a shortage of water, and most of the stored soil moisture is rapidly evapotranspired (soil-moisture utilization), usually by the first of July. From this time until precipitation once again exceeds potential evapotranspiration, the actual rate of evapotranspiration is less than the potential rate (water deficit).

The average annual potential evapotranspiration in the study area is 34.1 in. However, average calculated annual actual evapotranspiration is only about 22.3 in., because, as seen in figure 6, the periods of greatest potential evapotranspiration coincide with the periods of least precipitation. During 1935-77 water years the calculated annual actual evapotranspiration ranged from a maximum of 32.6 in. in 1954 to a minimum of 17.1 in. in 1967 (fig. 7). Figure 8 shows the probability, based on the data in figure 7, that a particular amount of actual evapotranspiration will take place in any single year. Actual evapotranspiration will probably exceed 18 in. in 9 of 10 years, but 26 in. in only 1 of 10 years.

10

&. == 4

^__ ^~H j

i (/)

£ |141 i

Precipation--Potential evapotranspiration

ONDJFMAMJJAS

AVERAGE ANNUAL AMOUNTS (inches)

Water surplusWater deficitSoil moisture utilizationSoil moisture recharge

FIGURE 6. Average annual water balance in the study area, based on data from 1935-77.

11

1940 1950 1960 1970

FIGURE 7. Annual evapotranspiration, 1935-77 water years

10 20 30 405060 70 80

PERCENTAGE

90 95

FIGURE 8. Percentage of time that various values of annual evapotranspiration were equaled or exceeded, 1935-77.

12

Direct Runoff Plus Ground-Water Recharge

That part of precipitation not lost as evapotranspiration or stored as soil moisture leaves the study area as direct runoff (runoff entering stream channels promptly after precipitation), or recharges the ground-water reservoir. Direct runoff plus ground-water recharge is equal to precipitation minus actual evapotranspiration. Neither direct runoff nor ground-water recharge could be directly measured, therefore they are left as a sum. In the section on the water budget, calculations will be made to separate these two items. Figure 9 shows direct runoff plus ground-water recharge calculated for the 1935-77 water years. During this period, it averaged about 18 in./yr, and ranged from a minimum of 6.6 in. in 1977 to a maximum of 31.1 in. in 1974. Figure 10 shows the probability of the occurrence of a particular amount of direct runoff plus ground-water recharge in any single year. It will probably exceed 11 in. 90 percent of the time and 25 in. 10 percent of the time.

A summary of the monthly disposition of precipitation is shown in figure 11. The figure shows the long-term (1935-77 water years) average distribution of precipitation between evapotranspiration and direct runoff plus ground-water recharge. Not directly shown in the figure, but affecting the distribution, is the amount of water stored as soil moisture at any particular time. (See fig. 6 for soil-moisture distribution.)

Surface Water

To provide a basis for appraisal of stream flow in the reservation, continuous-record gaging stations were installed and operated during the period October 1974-September 1977 near the mouths of Tulalip and Mission Creeks (pi. 1). The streamflow records obtained represent discharges from drainage areas of 15.4 and 7.92 mi2, respectively. Daily streamflows and water temperatures at these two sites are given in tables 10 and 11 at end of report. In addition, monthly streamflow measurements were made at 16 selected sites (pi. 1) to obtain information on the amount and distribution of surface-water flow along the main stream channels and their tributaries.

These periodic measurements are listed along with stream temperatures in table 12 at end of report. One of the selected measuring sites, site 1 on Quilceda Creek, was formerly operated as a continuous-record gage during 1946-69, and some miscellaneous streamflow measurements had been made at sites 12, 18, and 20 prior to this study. The drainage areas of the measuring sites are listed in tables 10 and 12.

Streamflow characteristics needed in the planning and development of surface-water resources include monthly and annual mean flows, and the frequencies and durations of selected flood discharges and low flows. All of those streamflow characteristics, except the flood-discharge characteristics, were obtained from the flow records at six long-term stations in the Puget Sound lowland area, and then transferred to selected sites in the study area through streamflow correlations. Inthe correlations, monthly measurements at the selected sites were related to same-day values at the long-term stations. Selection of the best relations depended upon (1) the highest accuracy as indicated by the lowest standard error of estimate (these ranged from 0.015 to 0.10 in base 10 logarithm units), and (2) the highest degree of correlation between the data for the selected station and the long-term station as indicated by the correlation coefficient nearest unity (these ranged from 0.77 to 0.92).

13

1940 1950 1960 1970

FIGURE 9. Annual direct runoff plus ground-water recharge,1935-77 water years.

20 30 405060 70 80

PERCENTAGE

FIGURE 10. Percentage of time that various values of annual direct runoff plus ground-water recharge were equaled or exceeded, 1935-77 water years.

14

O O

3 ^

(D O

< a

oj n

> 0)

Ui

v 3 CO

.

cr t

3 S

P)

i_i.

(DCO

r-

i fU

(T>

tD

3

O.

rt H-

3

O

O

O3

33

<! O

» rt

H.

3

<!

3

Cu03

O

-rt

PL

H

- H

- H

- CO

O

^

rt

(D

i-<

O

. O

H«

Jto

rt

or

" C

rt

C

H

-fri M

> 3

O

O

3

^

i-h K

> O

M

i-h

<

T3

(D ^

C

H

(D

CO

(D

rt

o

rt

OQ

H

-

CD

o

H*3

C

rt

p.

pi

pipu

rt

>

I H«

^

^

O

3

(D

OQ

H

ft

O

3rt

«

DIRE

CT RU

NOFF

PLUS GROUND-WATER

CALC

ULAT

ED A

CTUA

LRECHARGE,

IN IN

CHES

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION,

IN INCHES

PRECIPITATION, IN

IN

CHES

oro

anGO

en

oo

o

m

-o<

o

&>

r+-a

ft)

O

=3C

^"

Cr

-s

-

a>

curs

oo

The "Log-Pearson Type III" method was used to obtain frequency distributions for annual and monthly mean discharges and low flows for selected durations at the six long-term stations. From the frequency distributions estimates were made of monthly mean and annual mean discharges at a 50-percent probability of exceedence and low flows at 5-, 10-, 20-, and 50-percent probability of exceedence. By definition, median flows have a 50-percent exceedence probability. Median annual mean flows (table 1) and median monthly mean flows for May-October (table 2) were estimated for nine sites from the correlations. Median monthly mean flows were not calculated for the wet season (November-April) because correlations with long-term stations were not as reliable as for the dry season. Low flows for the selected probabilities were estimated for intervals of 7, 30, and 90 consecutive days by correlation for 10 sites (table 3).

The low flows for specific periods of consecutive days and nonexceedence probabilities are interpreted as follows: for example, at site 2 a 7-day low flow of 1.7 ft3/s at the 20-percent probability of being less than indicated means that during any year the minimum mean flow for 7 consecutive days has a 20-percent probability (chance of 1 in 5) of being less than 1.7 ft3/s.

Annual maximum peak discharges, or flood discharge characteristics, were calculated for 18 sites in the study area for exceedence probabilities of 1, 2, 10, and 50 percent in any year. These discharges were calculated (table 4) from regression equations defined by Cummans, Collings, and Nassar (1975). Flood discharges for specific exceedence probabilities are interpreted as follows: for example, at site 1 a flood discharge of 120 ft^/s at the 50-percent-probability level means that during any year the peak flow has a 50-percent probability (chance of 1 in 2) of exceeding 120 ft3/s.

16

TABLE 1.--Annual mean flows at selected sites from correlations, with a 50-percent probability of being less than indicated, and from streamflow records and from a water budget

(cubic feet per second)

Station number

12157020 12157030 12157035

12157150 12157210 12157250

12158010 12158030 12158040

Station name and basin

Quilceda Cr basin

site 2 site 3 site 4

Mission Cr basin


Tulalip Cr basin


Median annual mean

flow from correlations

13.2 3.0 2.0

1.6 1.0 6.7

8.9 2.1

12.1

Measured annual mean Average annual * flow [water yearl flow from1975 1976 1977 water budget

6.3 7.2 3.8 6.2

12.3 14.2 8.8 12.1

1-See section on water budget.

17

TABLE 2.--Monthly mean flows from correlations at selected sites, May-October, with a 50-percent probability of being less than indicated

(cubic feet per second)

Station number

121570201215703012157035

121571501215721012157250

121580101215803012158040


Quilceda Crbasin

site 2site 3site 4

Mission Crbasin

site 6site 9site 12

Tulalip Crbasin

site 15site 17site 20

May

2.61.31.4

.7

.43.2

5.51.67.7

June

2.41.11.1

.7

.42.2

5.01.47.2

July

2.1.9.7

.6

.31.3

4.51.26.5

August

2.0.8.6

.6

.31.2

4.31.16.2

September

2.1.8.6

.6

.31.7

4.51.26.3

October

2.2.9.8

.6

.42.8

4.91.36.7

18

TABLE 3.-Low flows at selected sites for selected periods of consecutive days and probabilities of being less than indicated

Station number

12157000

12157020

12157035

12157035

12157150

12157210

12157250

12158010

12158030

12158040


Quilceda Crbasin

site 1

site 2

site 3

site 4

Mission Crbasin

site 6

site 9

site 12

Tulalip Crbasin

site 15

site 17

site 20

Number of Low flows (ft-Vs), for consecu- the indicated probabilitytive days

73090

73090

73090

73090

73090

73090

73090

73090

73090

73090

50

4.14.65.4

1.81.82.0

.6

.6

.7

.4

.4

.6

.5,5.6

.2

.2

.3

.7

.81.4

3.94.04.4

1.01.01.1

5.55.66.1

20

3.53.84.6

1.71.71.8

.5

.5

.6

.3

.3

.4

.5

.5

.5

.2

.2

.2

.5

.6

.9

3.83.84.1

.91.01.0

5.25.25.7

10

3.23.54.3

1.61.61.8

.5

.5

.6

.3

.3

.4

.5

.5

.5

.2

.2

.2

.5

.5

.8

3.73.73.9

.9

.91.0

5.05.15.5

5

3.03.24.0

1.61.61.7

.4

.4

.5

.2

.2

.3

.4

.5

.5

.2

.2

.2

.4

.4

.6

3.63.73.8

.9

.91.0

4.94.95.3

Minimum measured f lowsl

7-day 1 day

2.8 2.2

__ -_

-_ --

_- -_

_.-. - _

-_ -_

.3 .1

..

_- --

4.2 3.7

1 Years of record: site 1 (22 yrs), sites 12 and 20 (3 yrs).

19

TABLE 4.--Flood discharges at selected sites for selected probabilities of exceedence

Station number

12157000121570201215703012157035

12157140121571501215717012157202121572101215724712157250

12158001121580081215801012158025121580301215803212158040


Quilceda Crbasin

site 1site 2site 3site 4

Mission Crbasin

site 5site 6site 7site 8site 9site 11site 12

Tulalip Crbasin

site 13site 14site 15site 16site 17site 18site 20

Flood discharge (ft-Vs) for indicated probability of exceedence, in percent^

50

(+42 pet)T+42%)pet)

120802920

413138

155160

46606881416

100

10

(+45%pet)

2001304833

7222213258599

7698

110132326

170

2

(+55%pet)

2801906746

930301834

120140

110140160183236

230

1

(+61%pet)

3202107552

1034332038

130155

120150180203540

260

Maximum measured discharge^

306------

----_----.41

..----------65

^Flood discharges calculated using repression equations defined by Cummans, Collings, and Nassar (1975).

2Years of record: site 1 (22 yrs), sites 12 and 20 (3 yrs).

20

Tulalip Creek Basin

Tulalip Creek drains an area of 15.4 mi2, 9.3 mi2 of which is on the reservation. The remaining 6.1 mi2 lie north of the reservation and include Lakes Goodwin and Shoecraft, which have a combined surface area of about 1.1 mi2. The drainage basin has a surficial cover primarily of till. Some areas have a surficial cover of sand and gravel with some silt and clay. A few small areas of silt, clay, and peat exist, as well as very small outcroppings of sand and gravel. The outflow from the large lakes north of the reservation is partly regulated by manipulation of planks in a wooden flume at the outlet of Lake Shoecraft. There is some natural regulation of flow by small lakes and beaver ponds. Prior to August 1975, the Tulalip Tribe diverted several tenths of a cubic foot per second of flow from the East Fork of Tulalip Creek for domestic use. After a ground-water supply was put into service, the surface-water system was placed on a standby basis. Present diversions (1978) are limited to fisheries operations near the creek's mouth and are nonconsumptive.

The calculated median annual mean flow from the basin (site 20) is 12.1 ft3/s, which is an average rate of 0.79 ft3/s per mi2. The areas above sites 15 and 17 yield 0.91 and 1.4 ft3/s per mi2, respectively, and the remainder of the basin yields only 0.26 ft3/s per mi2. Calculated median monthly mean flows for the dry season at these three sites show a steady decrease in flow from May through August followed by increases in September and October.

The calculated low flows from the basin indicate an extremely reliable source of base flow. The 7-day 5-percent low flow (4.9 ft3/s) and the 7-day 50-percent low flow (5.5 ft3/s) differ by only 12 percent. The same low flow intervals and probabilities at sites 15 and 17 show similar reliability, with differences of 8 and 11 percent, respectively. The lowest 7-day low flow measured at site 20 (three years of record) was 4.2 ft3/s, less than the calculated 7-day 5-percent probability low flow. However, this measured low flow occurred in the 1977 water year, which was the driest in 43-years of record (a 2.3-percent probability). This implies that the calculated low flows are reasonably accurate.

Flood discharges at seven sites in the basin were calculated. The greatest calculated discharge, 260 ft3/s, is at site 20 and at a probability of exceedance of 1 percent in any year. A flood discharge of 100 ft3/s with a 50-percent probability was calculated at the site, but during the three years record at the site, the greatest discharge was only 65 ft3/s. This implies that the calculated discharges may be too large, but this can not be confirmed with the limited data available.

21

Mission Creek Basin

Mission Creek drains an area of 7.92 mi 2 , all of which is on the reservation. The drainage basin has a surficial cover primarily of till. Some areas have a surficial cover of sand and gravel and some silt and clay. A few very small areas of silt, clay, and peat also exist. The only regulation of flow is natural, in lakes and beaver ponds. There are no known diversions, although a few residents reportedly pump small quantities of surface water on an infrequent basis.

The calculated median annual mean flow from the basin (site 12) is 6.7 ft3/s, which is an average rate of 0.85 ft3/s per mi2. The areas above sites 6 and 9 yield 1.2 and 0.64 ft3/s per mi2, respectively, and the remainder of the basin yields 0.82 ft3/s per mi2. Calculated median monthly mean flows for the dry season at these three sites show a steady decrease in flow starting in May and reaching lowest flows in August.

The calculated low flows indicate an extremely reliable source of base flow at sites 6 and 9, but not quite so reliable for site 12. At site 12, the 7-day 5-percent low flow (0.4 ft3/s) and the 7-day 50-percent low flow (0.7 ft3/s) differ by 75 percent. The same low-flow intervals and probabilities at sites 6 and 9 show less variation, with differences of 25 and 0 percent, respectively. The lowest 7-day low flow measured at site 12 (three years of record) was 0.3 ft3/s, less than the calculated 7-day 5-percent probability low flow. However, this measured low flow occurred in the 1977 water year, which was the driest in 43 years of record (a 2.3-percent probability). This implies that the calculated low flows are reasonably accurate.

Flood discharges at seven sites in the basin were calculated. The greatest calculated discharge, 155 ft3/s, is at site 12 and at a probability of exceedance of 1 percent. A flood discharge of 60 ft3/s with a 50-percent probability was calculated at that site, but during the 3 years of gaging at the site, the greatest recorded discharge was only 41 ft3/s. This implies that the calculated flood discharges may be too large, but this can not be confirmed with the limited data available.

22

Quilceda Creek Basin

Quilceda Creek drains an area of about 42.2 mi2, about 9.9 mi2 of which is on the reservation. The part of the drainage basin on the reservation has a surficial cover almost entirely of sand with some till along its western edge and some clay, silt, and peat along its southern edge. There is no known regulation of flow other than natural regulation by beaver ponds. There are no known large diversions, but some residents pump small quantities of surface water on an irregular basis.

The calculated median annual mean flows at sites 3 and 4, which have drainage areas entirely within the reservation boundaries, are 3.0 and 2.0 ft3/s, respectively. Site 2, which has 37 percent of its drainage area in the reservation, has a calculated median annual mean flow of 13.2 ft3/s. The average rates of yield for sites 2, 3, and 4 are 1.4, 1.0, and 1.1 ft3/s per mi2. Calculated median monthly mean flows for the dry season at these three sites show a steady decrease in flow starting in May and reaching lowest flows in August.

The calculated low flows indicate an extremely reliable source of base flow at site 2 and less reliable sources at sites 3 and 4. At site 2, the 7-day 5-percent low flow (1.6ft3/s) and the 7-day 50-percent low flow (1.8 ft3/s) differ by only 12 percent. The same flow intervals and probabilities at sites 3 and 4 show differences of 50 and 100 percent, respectively. The lowest 7-day low flow measured at site 1 (22 years of record) was 2.8 ft3/s, which agrees well with the calculated 7-day 5-percent probability low flow of 3.0 ft3/s.

Flood discharges at four sites in the basin were calculated. The greatest calculated discharge, 320 ft3/s, is at site 1, off the reservation, and at a probability of exceedence of 1 percent in any year. Flood discharges of 200 and 280 ft3/s with respective probabilities of 10 and 2 percent were calculated for the site. During 22 years of gaging at the site the greatest recorded discharge was 306 ft3/s. This implies that the calculated flood discharges are reasonably accurate. The largest calculated flood discharge in that part of the Quilceda Creek basin on the reservation is at site 2,210 ft3/s, at a 1-percent probability.

23

Lakes

Eight lakes on the reservation range in area from 1.3 to 23 acres. Table 5 gives the location, name, and some physical characteristics of each lake. Table 6 lists lake levels and water-surface temperatures of the three largest lakes on the reservation, and of Lake Shoecraft, in the headwaters of Tulalip Creek north of the reservation. A reconnaissance study of Weallup Lake and an intensive water-quality investigation of Ross Lake have been made. The results are contained in two separate reports, Bortleson and others (1976) and Dion (1979).

Gages were installed on John Sam, Ross, and Weallup Lakes (all natural lakes) in late September 1974 to allow observations of water-surface elevations and their fluctuations during the study period. The gage heights were observed during the period from September 17, 1974, to September 6, 1977.

The net changes in the level of John Sam Lake were +0.32 ft, +0.18 ft, and -0.30 ft, during the 1975, 1976, and 1977 water years, respectively. Changes of level in Ross Lake were similar for the same period: +0.32 ft, +0.28 ft, -0.14ft. Weallup Lake, however, showed a somewhat different pattern: +0.72 ft, +0.32 ft, +0.12 ft. The changes in Weallup Lake were at least partly caused by a beaver dam constructed in February-March 1975 which altered the elevation of the outlet of the lake.

Surface drainage from Ross and Weallup Lakes is by overflow into natural stream channels, whereas the outlet of John Sam Lake has been altered by a deposit of fill and the installation of a 2-foot diameter, concrete culvert. Additional regulation of the level of John Sam Lake is accomplished by partial blocking of the culvert with a removable wooden plate.

24

TABLE 5.--Some physical data on lakes

[Data from Wolcott, 1973]

Name

John Sam Lake-----

i i j u v- 1 y L. u r\ v

Mary Shelton Lake-U a a 1 1 1 1 n 1 al/o _ _ _ _

Ross Lake Unnamed-------- Unnamed-----------

Location

30/4-1M/N 30/4-2B/C 30/4-2C 30/4-2L/M 30/4-4L/M 30/4-13A 30/4-24B/C 30/5-29H

Elevation (ft)

506 456 450 368 213 375 270 15

Area (acres)

15.3 11.1 4.0

12.4a23 b2 i

1.3 1.3

Maximum depth (ft)

40 35

shallow

12 b73

a Data from Bortleson and others (1976). bData from Dion (1979).

25

TABLE 6.--Gage heights and water temperature of selected lakes

[Gages installed at arbitrary datum and temperatures measured within 1 foot of lake surface]

Date

1974

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1975

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

17 27 30

8 15

8 14

5 12

7 15

4 5

11

4 14

9 10 16

7 13

3 16

10 21

5 6

19

2

7 21

4 5

18

11 16

John Sam

Gage height (ft)

14.5 14.34

14.22 14.17

14.17 14.17

14.44 14.49

15.35

15.71 15.84

15.84

15.76

15.72

15.78 15.81

15.55 15.44

15.28 15.12

14.89

14.78

14.82

14.56 14.83

14.96 15.27

15.45 15.31

Lake*

Water tempera ture (°C)

16.1 15.0

9.4 11.1

6.7 5.6

2.8

3.3

__

11.1

12.4 19.4

21.5

25.0 21.5

21.5

19.5

18.1

13.7 11.8

10.6 5.5

5.4 3.0

Ross Lake^

Gage Water height tempera- (ft) ture °C)

15.20

15.089

15.16

15.40

16.00

16.18

16.60

16.30

16.29

16.05

15.79

15.48

15.52

15.36

15.78

16.58

--

15.6

10.6

7.8

5.1

3.0

5.9

9.6

12.2

--

22.6

--

19.6

15.6

-

6.5

Weallup Lake 3

Gage Water height tempera- (ft) ture (°C)

15.24

15.10

15.12

15.33

15.79

16.82

17.29

16.66

16.91

17.15

16.54

16.02

15.96

15.62

15.80

17.50

--

--

11.1

8.9

4.6

1.0

7.0

9.0

15.5

__

22.6

16.0

19.6

12.0

11.8

5.4

Lake Shoecraft 4

Gage height 4

(ft)

1.02 .94 .92

.86

.84

.92

.96

1.22 1.28

1.64 1.80

1.60 1.60 1.66

1.78 1.68

1.62 1.62 1.62

1.80 1.88

1.70 1.58

1.56 1.46

1.27 1.25 1.22

1.26

--

--

--

1976

Jan.

Feb.

7 8

13 20

3 17

15.26

15.51

15.17 15.23

4.0

6.4

16.47

16.37

3.8

3.8

17.52 17.54

17.60

4.5

5.6

--

-

26

TABLE 6.--Gage heights and water temperature of selected lakes--Continued

[Gages installed at arbitrary datum and temperatures measured within 1 foot of lake surface]

John Sam Lake 1

Date

1976

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

316

7 8

19

3 17

222

12 16

3 4

31

8 9

21

51229

315

Gage height (ft)

15.5415.61

15.81

15.84

15.77 15.67

15.6815.54

15.28 15.23

14.96

15.06

15.00

14.90

14.7814.74--

14.6814.65


5.68.2

--

11.3

16.7 18.2

15.8--

-

21.0

00

--

--

15.8__--

12.6--

Ross Lake 2

Gage height (ft)

16.37--

167.40

--

16.39

16.19--

15.92

15.68

--

15.80--

15.70.---

15.65--

Water tempera ture °C)

4.7--

--

--

11.1

16.2--

-

--

--

--

--

17.0.---

11.6--

Weallup Lake3

Gage height (ft)

17.54--

17.70--

17.46 17.23

17.16--

16.67

16.30--

16.28

--

16.09.-16.04

15.98--


4.4--

--

10.3

16.0

17.8--

15.6

15.0--

--

--

15.0----

12.8--

Lake Shoecraft 4

Gage height 4

(ft)

--

--

--

--

__--

.-

1.30

--

1.40--

1.32----

1.29--

Dec. 15.65 15.91

1977

Jan.Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJuneJulyAug.Sept.

415744163

, 6

ijohn

14.14.14.15.15.15.15.14.14.

Sam

666987161460228670

Lake

9.2__ 16.218.021.026.019.7

. --Enamel

151516161616151515

.78

.88

.09

.28

.23

.40

.96

.70

.66

staff gage on

5.6 7.315.619.219.224.621.9

Ralph

151616171618171616

.96

.04 9

.48 7

.62 12

.85 15

.08 16

.38 21

.78 26

.40 20

.6

.2

.3

.2

.4

.4

.6

.3

Berring dock approximately

1.471.641.811.89--

1.901.561.341.26

200 ft northeast ofthe concrete outlet. Top of dock is at 17.60 ft and top of concrete culvert outlet is t 17.26 ft gage height.

2Ross Lake.--Enamel staff gage on alder tree 150 ft north of access road at southeast side of lake. Reference mark is top of a square spike in alder tree 30 ft east of the gage and at 19.28 ft gage height.

3Weallup Lake.--Enamel staff gage about 100 ft south of access road at east end of lake. Reference mark is top of spike in cedar tree 10 ft east of gage and at 19.36 ft gage height.

4Lake Shoecraft.--Enamel staff gage on E. G. Gilbert's property at southwest side of lake. Reference marks are: (l)head of bolt in cedar tree 36 ft shoreward of gage and at 5.364 ft gage height, (2) head of bolt in maple tree 40 ft shoreward of gage and at 5.546 ft gage height, (3) head of bolt in maple tree 60 ft shoreward of gage and at 7.626 ft gage height.

27

Water Quality

In order to assess the quality of surface water on the reservation, 121 water samples were collected from 14 stream sites during the period November 1974-March 1977. All 121 samples were analyzed for coliform-bacteria concentrations, 71 were analyzed for nutrient 1 concentrations, and 24 were analyzed for common constituents. Table 13 (at end of report) contains the data from these analyses. Included in table 13 are data from two analyses of water samples collected from Weallup Lake in 1973 (Bortleson and others, 1976) and eight analyses of water collected from Ross Lake in 1975. The Ross Lake data'are discussed in detail in an earlier report (Dion, 1979).

The water-quality data indicate that the only potential water-quality problems observed were high total and fecal-coliform bacteria concentrations, high total-phosphorus concentrations, and high temperatures.

Minimum, median, and maximum coliform bacteria concentrations are shown in table 7. The highest median concentrations were observed in water from the Quilceda Creek basin. The basin includes large residential areas as well as grazing areas for cattle and other domesticated animals. The basins of Tulalip and Mission Creeks are much less developed. Most coliform bacteria in these two creeks are probably associated with the abundant wildlife and natural vegetation in the basins.

High concentrations of total phosphorus can lead to the development of nuisance aquatic plant growths. Suggested acceptable limits for total phosphorus are (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1974):

Maximum total Water body phosphorus (P) concentration

Within lakes, ponds, and 0.025 mg/Lreservoirs

At points where streams .050 mg/Lenter lakes, ponds, orreservoirs

Flowing streams .100 mg/L

Samples from Ross Lake were well below the suggested limit, but one of two samples from Weallup Lake exceeded the limit. The area around Ross Lake is completely undeveloped. To the north of Weallup Lake lie residential communities surrounding Lakes Goodwin and Shoecraft. However, samples taken at the outlet of Lake Shoecraft (site 13), just above Weallup Lake, show low concentrations of total phosphorus, which implies that the high concentration observed in Weallup Lake may be natural.

Water samples collected at site 17 (inflow to the reservoirs for the tribal standby water-supply system) tended to have high concentrations of total phosphorus. One of six samples exceeded the limit of 0.050 mg/L, and two others equaled the limit.

IA nutrient is any chemical element, ion, or compound that is required by an organism for the continuation of growth, reproduction, and other life processes. Nitrogen and phosphorus usually are considered the limiting nutrients for aquatic plant growth algae in particular and as such received the most emphasis in this study.

28

TABLE 7.--Coliform-bacteria concentrations in selected streams,November 1974-March 1977

Total coliform bacteria (colonies/100 ml)

Basin and site number

Quilceda Creek 2 3 4

Mission Creek 6 7 9

11 12

Tulalip Creek 13 14 15 17 18 20

Number of Mini- samples mum

7 1 1

8 6 8 6

26

5 1 2

22 2

26

220

69 31 38 4410

14

69 7

130 36

Med 1 an

930- 1,000 - - 1,600

500 140 175 265 120

25 1 no .204 89

320 2

Maxi mum

4,400

1,600 TNTC 1,800 610

1,600

220

340 370 510

4,100

Fecal coliform (colonies/100 ml)

Number of Mini- Maxi- samples mum mum

1 1 1

2

2

4

1 1 2

2 4

130 -- 84 340

1 120

1 8

1 294

3 26

3 11

11 11 11 1,500

TNTC = Too numerous to count.

29

Samples from flowing streams exceeded the limit in three places (two from Quilceda Creek basin, sites 2 and 4, and one from Tulalip Creek basin, site 20). The high concentrations in Quilceda Creek basin may be associated with agricultural and residential activities in the basin, but the high concentration in Tulalip Creek was probably a natural occurrence.

Although only Ross and Weallup Lakes of the sampled waters listed in table 13 had temperatures that exceeded the recommended level for fish-rearing purposes, 65°F (18.3QC) (Washington Department of Ecology, 1973), the temperatures at most sites probably exceeded the recommended level for at least brief periods each summer. Table 11 (at end of report) shows that water temperatures at sites 12 and 20, obtained from continuous-temperature recorders, frequently exceeded 65°F (18.3°C) from May through August of 1975 and 1976. During the period October 16, 1974-September 30, 1976, the temperature of Mission Creek ranged from 70°F (21°C) on July 5, 6, 7, and 27, 1975, to 33°F (0.5OC) on November 29, December 19 and 21, 1975, and February 6, 1976; during this period the temperature of Tulalip Creek ranged from 71° (21.5°C) on June 1 and July 26 and 27, 1975, to 320p (QOC) on November 29, 1975, and February 5, 1976.

At both sites, the daily fluctuation in water temperature during the colder months (October-February) was about 2° to 4°F (10 to 2°C). During the warmer months (April-July), Tulalip Creek had a daily temperature fluctuation of about 160 to isop (9° to 10°C), and the fluctuation in Mission Creek was about 120 to 140F (6O to 70Q).

The available data indicate that relationships apparently exist between flow conditions and concentrations of certain nutrients (table 8), although the number of samples is not sufficient to establish reliable correlations.

Nitrate and total-nitrogen concentrations tended to be greater during wet-season flows than during low flows at all sites sampled, whereas total-phosphorus concentrations tended to show an opposite relationship with flow conditions. The greatest total-phosphorus concentrations were generally observed in the dry-season storm runoff. Concentrations of ammonia, total organic nitrogen, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen in the Quilceda and Tulalip Creek basins were generally substantially higher during wet-season flows than during low flows. In the Mission Creek basin, higher concentrations of ammonia were recorded during low flows than during wet-season flows, but the concentrations of total organic nitrogen and total Kjeldahl nitrogen were similar during both wet-season flows and low flows. The highest ammonia concentrations at most sites were observed during the dry-season runoff. Nitrite, dissolved orthophosphate, and coliform-bacteria concentrations showed no consistent relationships with flow.

30

TABLE 8. Averaqe concentrations of nutrients under varying streamflow conditions

Average concentrations,

Basin name and site number

Quilceda Cr#2

Mission Cr#6

#7

#9

#11

#12

Tulalip Cr#1 5

#17

*ia

#20

Flow condition^

Low flowDry-seasonstorm runoff

Wet-seasonflow


Wet-seasonflow


Wet-seasonflow


Wet-seasonflow


Wet-seasonflow


Wet-seasonflow

Low flowWet-season

flow


Wet-seasonflow

Low flowWet-seasonflow


Wet-seasonflow

Number of samples

3

1

3

2

1

2

1

3

2

]

5

2

1

3

3

1

5

l

1

2

1

3

1

]

3

1

5

Average discharge

(ft3/ s )

2.2

12

19

.74

.98

1.2

.04

.74

1.3

.36

.73

.98

2.5

7.4

7.9

2.2

8.8

6.6

3.8

4.6

1.2

1.8

2.1

2.3

2.8

6.3

10

IS

Nitrate (total, as N)

0.23

.40

1.2

.35

.65

1.6

.03

.23

1.7

.72

.73

1.7

.02

.02

.89

.02

.04

.58

.53

1.1

.95

1.1

1.3

.60

1.0

.16

.12

.55

Nitrite (total, as N)

0.01

.02

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.00

.01

.00

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

.00

.00

.00

.01

.01

.01

.01

.01

Nitrogen, ammonia (total, as N)

0.05

.25

.21

.09

.22

.06

.08

.10

.05

.06

.07

.05

.18

.13

.10

.13

.15

.11

.05

.07

.04

.03

.04

.03

.06

.10

.20

.10

in milligrams per liter

Nitrogen, total organic (as N)

0.19

.35

.40

.28

1.1

.26

.24

.57

.44

.28

.28

.33

.40

.33

.35

.43

.39

.36

.23

.34

.14

.21

.23

.19

.28

.30

.39

.37

Nitrogen, total

kjeldahl (as N)

0.24

.60

.612

.38

1.3

.31

.32

.67

.49

.33

.28

.38

.58

.46

.45

.57

.54

.47

.28

.41

.19

.24

.27

.22

.34

.40

.59

.47

Nitrogen, total (as N)

0.48

1.0

1.8

.74

2.0

1.9

.62

.91

2.1

1.1

1.0

2.1

.60

.49

1.3

.60

.59

1.0

.82

1.5

1.2

1.3

1.6

.83

1.3

.57

.72

1.0

Phosphorus total (as P)

0.08

.13

.07

.04

.07

.02

.02

.03

.01

.03

.02

.02

.03

.03

.02

.04

.04

.03

.04

.04

.06

.05

.04

.07

.05

.07

.07

.06

Phosphorus, dissolved orthophosphate (as P)

0.05 .05

.02

.04

.02

.02

.00

.01

.01

.02

.01

.01

.02

.01

.01

.03

.02

.02

.03

.04

.04

.04

.03

.06

.05

.04

.05

.04

'Low flow: Sites sampled on 11/6/74, 11/7/74, 9/18/75, and 9/9/76. Dry-season storm runoff: Sites sampled on 6/3/76. Wet-season flow: Sites sampled on 1/4/75, 2/5/75, 5/8/75, 12/18/75,

3/4/76, and 3/8/77

31

Ground Water

Geology

The major part of the reservation is situated on remnants of a glacial drift plain with most of its surface covered by till (or "hardpan") (unit 4, on figs. 12-18). This area is referred to as the Tulalip plateau. As noted by Newcomb (1952) and field observations, this glacially deposited material is a gray, concretelike mixture of clay- to gravel-size sediment and generally underlies the drift-plain surface to an average depth of 30 to 50 ft. The upper 10 to 20 ft of the till is generally weathered and does not exhibit the degree of cementation found at greater depths. The thickness of soils developed on the till is generally from 24 to 48 in. (Anderson and others, 1947). Below the soil zone the till is nearly impermeable, but inclusions of sand and gravel occur in places, allowing movement of water downward through the unit. Small areas of the drift plain are covered by thin patches of sand and gravel (unit 2) or silt and clay (unit 1), which in turn are generally underlain by the till unit.

Locally exposed in the sea cliffs along the western margin of the reservation is a sand unit (unit 5) as much as 200 ft thick. This unit is generally found beneath the till unit and contains some gravel and discontinuous layers of silt and clay. The sand unit is the most permeable of the known wide-spread units beneath the reservation.

A clay-and-silt unit (unit 6) that extends well below sea level generally underlies the sand unit. The clay-and-silt unit has a very low permeability, but does include some thin sand layers with much higher permeabilities.

In a few places, where wells extend more than 200 ft below sea level, a permeable sand-and-gravel unit (unit 7) has been encountered. The thickness and areal extent of this unit are not known.

What occurs at depths greater than several hundred feet below mean sea level is not known. Well 30/4-17K1 extends about 317 ft below sea level and is the deepest well in the reservation. The unconsolidated deposits beneath the reservation are about 1,600 ft thick (Hall and Othberg, 1974) and extend about 1,200 ft below sea level.

The eastern 1% mi of the reservation is in the Quilceda Creek lowland, which is part of the Marysville trough. In this area a unit (unit 3) composed predominantly of sand and silt is exposed. The unit ranges in thickness from a few feet at its western edge to several hundred feet near the eastern boundary of the reservation. To the south, the sand-and-silt unit grades into a unit of clay, silt and peat (unit 1). The till (unit 4), sand (unit 5), and clay-and-silt units (unit 6) that underlie the glacial drift plain to the west apparently underlie the sand-and-silt unit at places along the western margin of the lowland.

The surficial geology of the reservation is shown in figure 12. Schematic geologic sections are shown in figures 13-18. Drillers' logs are contained in table 14 (end of report).

32

122°20i it

17 30 15 122 12 30

48 05

_48 2 30 2 MILES

1 KILOMETJER

EXPLANATION

Clay, silt, peat, sand and gravel. Typically high in orgainc matter; water table very near land surface. Variable permeability.

Sand and gravel with some silt and clay, mostly less than 50 feet thick. Variable permeability.

Sand and silt with streaks of gravel and clay. Usually more than 40 feet thick. Highly permeable.

Mostly till ("hardpan"). Gray concrete-like mixture of clay-to- gravel-size sediment, 10 feet to 110 feet thick. Poorly permeable, except for included streaks of sand and gravel, and the weathered surface zone (about 10 feet thick).

Sand and some gravel, about 200 feet thick. Contains discontinuous layers of clay and silt. Highly permeable.

FIGURE 12. Generalized geology of the Tulalip Reservation. Modified from Newcomb (1952) and Mackey Smith (State of Washington Department of Natural Resources, written commun., 1977).

33

A 400 V

200'

SEA LEVEL

-200'

-30/5-6B3 West Fork Quilceda Creek

1 KILOMETER

VERTICAL EXAGGERATION X 10

EXPLANATION

3 Sand, with streaks of clay and gravel near base.

4 Mostly till, with streaks of sand and gravel. Surface usually weathered to a depth of 10 ft or more.

5 Sand and gravel, with many discontinuous layers of clay and silt.

FIGURE 13. Schematic geologic section along line A-A 1 of plate 1

34

B 1400'

30/5-7F1

200'

SEA LEVEL

30/5-9Q1

Unnamed tributary to Quilceda Creek

West Fork Quilceda Creek

-200'1 KILOMETER


EXPLANATION

3 Sand, with streaks of clay and gravel near base.4 Mostly till, with streaks of sand and gravel.

Surface usually weathered to a depth of 10 ft or more.5 Sand and gravel, with many discontinuous layers of clay

and silt.6 Clay, silt, and sand, with discontinuous layers of sand

and gravel.

FIGURE 14. Schematic geologic section along line B-B' of plate 1.

35

c 1600'

30/5-19M1

400'

200'

SEA LEVEL

Unnamed tributary to Quilceda Creek

Sturgeon Creek

30/5-20G4

1MILE

-200' 1 KILOMETER


EXPLANATION

3 Sand, with streaks of clay and gravel near base.

4 Mostly till, with streaks of sand and gravel.Surface usually weathered to a depth of 10 ft or more.


6 Clay, silt, and s<md, with discontinuous layers of sand and gravel.

FIGURE 15. Schematic geologic section along line C-C f of plate 1.

36

D 200 'r

-30/4-36P1330/4-36Q4

30/4-36R3

30/5-31F1

30/5-31B6

-200'


EXPLANATION

Clay, silt, peat, sand, and gravel. . Typically high in organic matter; water table very near land surface.

Sand and gravel with some silt and clay.Mostly till, with streaks of sand and gravel Surface usually weathered to a depth of 10 ft or more.Sand and gravel, with many discontinuous layers of clay and silt.

FIGURE 16. Schematic geologic section along line D-D' of plate 1.

37

600'

400'

200'

SEA LEVEL

-200'

30/4-6R2

30/4-7H1

30/4-17K1

-400' 1 KILOMETER


EXPLANATION


5 Sand and gravel, with many discontinuous layers of clay and silt.6 Clay, silt, and sand with discontinuous layers of sand and gravel.7 Coarse sand and gravel with discontinuous layers of sand and gravel

FIGURE 17. Schematic geologic section along line E-E' of plate 1.

38

600'

400'

200'

SEA LEVEL

East branch Tulalip Creek

30/4-1M1 30/4-1B1-F'

1 KILOMETER


EXPLANATION

2 Sand and gravel, with some silt and clay.



6 Clay, silt, and sand, with discontinuous layers of sand and gravel.

FIGURE 18. Schematic geologic section along line F-F 1 of plate 1

39

Aquifers

All the known geologic units beneath the reservation (fig. 12-18) are capable, at least in some places, of producing usable quantities of water. However, only the sand unit (unit 5) can be depended upon to produce significant quantities of water (greater than a single domestic supply) at most places in the reservation. Records of wells and water levels are contained in tables 15 and 16 (at end of report).

Along the eastern li mi of the reservation, the sand-and-silt unit (unit 3) is a dependable aquifer for single-domestic supplies. Wells are generally of large diameter (usually 3 ft or more) and from 10 to 30 ft deep. Where this unit grades into the unit of clay, silt and peat (unit 1) to the south, water supplies are commonly inadequate for single-domestic use. Yields from unit 3 vary greatly from place to place. Specific capacities 1 range from 0.1 to 26.0 gal/min/ft, with a median value of 4.4 gal/min/ft (based on data from 13 wells). Median "safe yield" (assuming maximum drawdown of one-half available drawdown) for a well in unit 3 is about 40 gal/min. No specific-capacity data are available from unit 1. Both of these units have very shallow water tables and are open to contamination from septic tanks.

The main surficial materials on the Tulalip plateau (units 2 and 4) yield small quantities of water in some places. Large-diameter wells, mostly less than 40 ft deep, generally are adequate for single-domestic use, but are insufficient in very dry years. No specific-capacity data are available for unit 2. The till (unit 4) ranges in specific capacity from 0.5 to 2.2 gal/min/ft, with a median value of 0.8 gal/min/ft (based on data from five wells). Median "safe yield" for a well in unit 4 is about 15 gal/min. Both units are open to contamination from septic tanks.

Of the known units beneath the reservation, the most widespread and productive aquifer is the sand unit (unit 5). This unit is found beneath almost all the Tulalip plateau and, in the northeast corner of the reservation, also extends a short distance beneath the surficial materials of the Marysville trough where flowing artesian conditions (water levels 21 to 50 ft above land surface) are found. Measured specific capacities range from 0.5 to 20 gal/min/ft, with a median value of 4.0 gal/min/ft (based on data from 43 wells). Median "safe yield" for a well in unit 5 is about 55 gal/min. Well depths range from a few feet (where they are dug into the base of the sea cliff at Priest Point) to nearly 300 ft (in the north-central part of the reservation), with a median depth of about 130 ft.

ISpecific capacity is the rate of discharge of water from a well divided by the resulting drawdown of the water level in the well. Most data available are for short-term (1-4 hours) bailer tests and, as such, probably result in values greater than the true specific capacity of the well, which generally is determined by a pumping test of 24-hours or more.

40

The clay and silt unit (unit 6) beneath the sand unit has discontinuous layers of sand or gravel, or both, that are moderately productive in some places. Specific capacities range from 0.2 to 2.0 gal/min/ft, with a median value of 0.95 gal/min/ft (based on data from 15 wells). Median "safe yield" for a well in unit 6 is about 45 gal/min. Well depths range from less than 100 ft (where they are drilled near sea level along the western shoreline) to more than 400 ft, with a median depth of about 180 ft.

Only two wells (30/4-17C1 and Kl) have been drilled through the clay-and-silt unit. Both encountered underlying sand and gravel (unit 7), and both are used for public supply (20 homes or less). Wells 17C1 and 17K1 are 372 ft and 507 ft deep, respectively, and 17C1 has a measured specific capacity of 6.0 gal/min/ft. Specific-capacity data are not available for 17Kl, but available water-level data and estimated pumping rates indicate a probable value of less than 1 gal/min/ft. The possible extent of this aquifer beneath other parts of the reservation is not known, nor is any information available regarding the possible existence of deeper aquifers.

41

Existing Ground-Water Development

As of 1978, four major parts of the reservation had significant ground-water development (pi. 1). The easternmost area (including the Marysville trough and the eastern edge of the Tulalip plateau) has the greatest number of wells, almost all of which are used for single domestic supplies. A very small amount of water is used for irrigation in the area. Most ground water obtained in this area comes from the sand-and-silt unit (unit 3), with minor amounts from the till and sand units (units 4 and 5, respectively).

The southernmost area (Priest Point area) has the second largest number of wells. Virtually all water use is for domestic purposes, either as single-domestic supplies or small public-supply systems (less than 50 homes). The water is obtained from units 2, 3, and 5, with all of the public-supply systems pumping from unit 5.

The westernmost area (the shoreline area from north of Sunny Shores to Hermosa Point) has intensive development around Spee-Bi-Dah, consisting of single-domestic and small public-supply systems (less than 20 homes). Development in the remainder of the area consists primarily of scattered small public-supply systems (less than 50 homes). The water is obtained primarily from unit 6, but also from units 4, 5, and 7. This is the only area where unit 7 has been encountered. Although the sand unit (unit 5) is present along much of the western shoreline, the unit is generally above the water table and therefore nonproductive in this area.

The final area (in the north-central part of the reservation) includes the tribal well field, which supplies the area around Tulalip Bay and most of the Indian homes in the southern and southeastern parts of the reservation. The rest of the area is a mixture of single-domestic and small public-supply systems (less than 50 homes). All the wells tap the sand unit (unit 5) except 30/4-1 Ml, which taps the underlying clay-and-silt unit (unit 6).

As of 1978, about 3,700 of the 3,987 year-round residents of the reservation were supplied by ground water obtained within the reservation boundaries. The remainder (primarily the "Marysville West" development) were supplied by the City of Marysville. Approximately 1,900 people were supplied by the tribal well field, 950 by small public-supply systems (more than 5 and fewer than 50 homes per well) and 850 by single-domestic supply wells. An additional 1,600 summer residents were supplied primarily by the tribal well field and the small public-supply systems along the shoreline.

The average rate of water use on the reservation (based on metered-flow records of the tribal well field for October 1977 through September 1978) is 122 gal/d per person. If an equal rate is assumed for the remainder of the reservation, then the annual use is about 183 million gallons (98 million from the tribal well field), or 0.78 ft3/s. The water use is virtually all domestic, with insignificant amounts used for stock and irrigation. Approximately 75 percent of the ground water used comes from unit 5, 9 percent each from units 3 and 6, 3 percent from unit 4, 2 percent from unit 7, and 1 percent each from units 1 and 2.

42

Water Quality

On the basis of the available water-quality data, most of the ground water in the study area is chemically suitable for drinking without treatment. Table 9 lists the chemical standards for drinking water that went into effect in June 1977 in accordance with the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (Public Law 93-523); also given are the number of sites and samples in the study area that have exceeded these standards in the past.

The maximum contaminant levels listed are of primary importance because they refer to concentrations of constituents that, if exceeded, may affect the health of consumers. The secondary recommended limits do not refer to health hazards, but to concentrations of constituents that may affect the esthetic quality of the water.

The maximum contaminant level determined for turbidity has been exceeded in the study area. Water with high turbidity values is hazardous primarily because it may interfere with chlorination processes. However, all high turbidity values in ground water in the study area are from deep wells in units 5, 6, and 7, which do not require chlorination, and are probably related to oxidation of dissolved iron after pumping and therefore do not indicate any significant health hazard.

One high lead concentration was observed in water from well 29/4-1 A3. However, a sample collected on the same day at well 29/4-1A2 (which is about 100 ft from 1A3 and open at the same depth in the same aquifer, unit 6) showed no lead present. The source of the lead in 1A3 is unknown.

The unsanitary conditions of some wells, indicated by the presence of coliform bacteria, is the most serious water-quality problem in the ground water of the study area. Five of the 16 shallow wells (33 ft deep or less) tested showed the presence of coliform bacteria in at least one sample. The available data show the problem to be restricted to shallow wells in units 3 and 4; however, additional sampling would probably show the presence of coliform bacteria in some wells tapping units 1 and 2 also.

The secondary recommended limits of iron, manganese, chloride, dissolved solids, pH, and color have been exceeded in the study area. At the sites tested, iron and manganese were the most common problems, exceeding their recommended limits at 28 and 33 percent, respectively, of the sites tested. Large concentrations of either of these two constituents often create a bad taste, stain plumbing fixtures and laundry, and cause clogging of pumps and pipes. Excessive iron concentrations have been encountered in all the aquifers except units 1 and 2, which were sampled only at two sites each. Excessive manganese concentrations are apparently restricted to the deeper aquifers (units 5, 6, and 7). The recommended limit of chloride was exceeded in water from two wells tapping unit 6. The bottom of one of these wells (29/4-1B6) is about 74 ft below sea level, and the well has a static water level of about 5 ft above sea level. This well may be in the freshwater-saltwater zone of diffusion. The source of the high concentration of chloride in well 30/4-1 Ml (which is 5 mi inland and only extends to a depth of 119 ft above sea level) is not known. A high value of 400 milligrams per liter (mg/L) was obtained upon completion of the well, and subsequent samples decreased to 100 mg/L and then to less than 10 mg/L. This is an indication that the well was probably contaminated in some way during drilling.

43

TABLE 9. Comparison of ground-water quality in the study area with standards established by the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act

Chemical standards

Number Maximum Proposed Number Number oor sites samples

or contamin- secondary . ,.tes samples ant level 1 recommended exceeding exceeding

,. . 2 chemical chemical;I"P! ed testgd________________llmt standard standard _____________________________________________

80 124 0.3 mg/L 22 35 9.4 mg/L 29/4-lAl, 1B2, 1B6, 1C130/4-lMl, 3C1, 10L1, 10L4, 17C1, 17K1, 21J1, 21J2,

35R1, 35R2, 36H1 30/5-5J1, 5K3, 8M7, 20F1, 20L1, 30G2, 30H1

33 56 0.05 mg/L 11 15 0.23 mg/L 29/4-1C230/4-lMl, 10L1, 10L4, 17C1, 21G1, 21J1, 28A1, 35R1,

36H1; 30/5-6H1

Sulfate

Chloride

Fluoride 3

Nitrate

Dissolved solids

pH

Color

4 Turbidity

bacteria

Arsenic

Barium

Cadmium

Chromium

Copper

Lead

Mercury

Selenium

Silver

Zinc

I

constituents

2U.S. Eesthetic qua

31

45

31

30

34

40

35

29

19

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

that may

lity of di

54

102

55

53

57

70

59

51

23

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

affect the

250 mg/L

250 mg/L

1.4 to 2,4 mg/L

10 mg/L

500 mg/L

<6.5 or >8.5

15 platinum- cobalt units

1 JTU

1 col/100 mL

0.05 mg/L

1.0 mg/L

0.010 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

1 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

0.002 mg/L

0.01 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

5 mg/L

ion Agency, 1977, National seconc

0

2

0

0

2

1

5

9

5

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

7

0

0

8

1

7

15

9

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

54 mg/L

820 mg/L 29/4-1B6; 30/4-lMl

0.4 mg/L

9.0 mg/L

1,440 mg/, 29/4-lAl, 1B6

Range 29/4-1C2 6.3-8.9

40 units 29/4-1B6 30/4-lMl, 10L4, 21J1, 36H1

75 JTU 29/4-1B6; 30/4-lMl, 6P1 , 10L4.17K1, 21J1, 21J2, 35R1, 36H1

800 col/100 mL 30/5-5M3, 7G2, 20K1, 20L1 , 29G6

<0.01 mg/L

<0.04 mg/L

<O.OOS mg/L

<0.01 mg/L

None

0.07 mg/L 29/4-1A3

<0.001 mg/L

<0.005 mg/L

<0.01 mg/L

0.47 mg/L

supply system is situated; the mean air temperature at the Everett weather station (1915-1977) was 50.6°F, and the average maximum daily air temperature was about 60op. At temperatures of 58.4° to 63.8°F, the maximum contaminant level is 2.0 mg/L.

Although the maximum contaminant level for turbidity applies only to surface water, the relatively high turbidities in ground-water samples

The maximum contaminant level depends upon the number of samples taken and the method of determination. The 1 col/100 mL level in the table is a

44

The generally high (more than 100 mg/L) chloride concentrations in wells 29/4-1A1 and 1B2, together with the concentrations in 29/4-1B6, are an indication of potential saltwater intrusion in the Priest Point area. However, as of 1978, the available data do not show any recognizable pattern of increased chloride concentrations with time. The two high concentrations of dissolved solids in the study area are associated with high chloride concentrations, one each from units 5 and 6.

One fairly low pH value (6.3) was measured in a sample from unit 5 in the Priest Point area. Other wells in the same aquifer and area have not shown a similar problem.

High values of color (platinum-cobalt units) have presented no significant problems in the study area, although water from five sites in units 5 and 6 has exceeded the recommended limit. These high values of color may be associated with the oxidation of iron and the resulting turbidity problems. Values above the recommended limit can be esthetically undesirable for domestic use and can be economically undesirable for some industrial uses.

Table 17 (at end of report) contains all available ground-water water-quality data.

Water Budget

Under natural conditions, the hydrologic system operating in the study area is presumably in a state of dynamic equilibrium. On a long-term basis, inflow to the system (precipitation, subsurface inflow, and surface-water inflow) is equal to outflow (evapotranspiration, subsurface outflow, and surface-water outflow), and there is no change in the amount of water in storage (at land surface, in the unsaturated zone, or in the ground-water reservoir).

Precipitation falling on the reservation follows three paths: (1) direct runoff to surrounding saltwater bodies or adjacent land areas, (2) evapotranspiration at land surface, and (3) infiltration to the unsaturated zone. Water in the unsaturated zone percolates downward to recharge the ground-water reservoir or moves to the land surface by capillary action and is evapotranspired.

Water that reaches the ground-water reservoir flows slowly toward the margins of the study area. Some water flows deeply, moves beneath the margins of the study area, and eventually discharges (below sea level) to saltwater bodies. Where the water table is within reach of rooted plants, some water is evapotranspired, and where it intersects the land surface, springflow (base runoff) occurs. Together, base runoff and direct runoff constitute the surface-water outflow from the hydrologic system.

45

Using the 3 years of surface-water discharge records on Mission and Tulalip Creeks (sites 12 and 20) it is possible to estimate annual net ground-water recharge by subtracting the annual surface-water discharge from the calculated annual direct runoff plus ground-water recharge values (fig. 9). Figure 19 shows a plot of net ground-water recharge versus direct runoff plus ground-water recharge for the 3 years of record. Long-term average annual net ground-water recharge is estimated by drawing a straight line through the data points and selecting the value (7 A in./yr) corresponding to average direct runoff plus ground-water recharge (18.1 in./yr). This calculated value of ground-water recharge does not include water that recharges the ground-water reservoir, only to return as base runoff to surface-water bodies, and therefore is referred to as net ground-water recharge. However, the calculated value does include ground-water recharge that is subsequently lost as ground-water evapotranspiration.

Based on the values for average annual net ground-water recharge (7.4 in./yr) and average annual direct runoff plus ground-water recharge (18.1 in./yr) shown in figure 19, an average annual surface-water discharge of 10.7 in. can be calculated for Tulalip and Mission Creek basins. This is equivalent to discharges of 12.1 and 6.2 ft-Vs for each basin. These values are similar to the median annual mean flows calculated from streamflow records (table 1) of 12.1 and 6.7 ft^/s.

A flow diagram of the hydrologic system and the water budget in the study area under natural conditions, including details of the budget calculations, is shown in figure 20. A land-surface area of 34.5 mi^ was used to calculate the water budget. Natural inflow to the hydrologic system is in the form of precipitation, which averages 103 ft^/s (40.4 in./yr on 34.5 mi^ of reservation), average surface-water inflow of 13ft^/s, and average subsurface inflow of 4 ft^/s, which gives an average total inflow of 120 ft^/s. Natural outflow occurs primarily as evapotranspiration from the land surface and unsaturated zone at an average rate of 57 ft*/s (22.3 in./yr on 34.5 mi^), average evapotranspiration from the ground-water reservoir of 5 ft-Vs, average surface-water outflow of 40 ft^/s, and average subsurface outflow of 18ft^/s. This budget is in balance, indicating that the hydrologic system is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.

The hydrologic system is in balance only relative to a long-term average. It is a dynamic system, constantly undergoing changes in inflow, outflow, and internal distribution of water in response to fluctuations in climatic and other factors.

Some of the observed effects of monthly variations in direct runoff plus ground-water recharge on streamflow and ground-water levels are shown in figure 21. During the period of observation, October 1974-September 1977, the study area received significant direct runoff plus ground-water recharge during November 1974-April 1975, October 1975-April 1976, December-March 1977, and in May 1977. Streamflows (site 20) and ground-water levels (30/4-3H1 and 30/5-5E2) responded in a predictable fashion. The large amount of direct runoff plus ground-water recharge in November-December 1974 produced only small increases in streamflow, probably because the major part became ground-water recharge. Although the

46

rate of direct runoff plus ground-water recharge steadily decreased from about 5.5 in. in December 1974 to 3.7 in. in March 1975, streamflows continually increased. This probably occurred because the soils of the reservation reached their capacity to hold and transmit water by December and most of the additional water became direct runoff. Also, increased springflow, resulting from higher ground-water levels, contributed greater flows to the streams.

A similar pattern of direct runoff plus ground-water recharge and streamflow occurred in October 1975-February 1976. The relatively small amount of direct runoff plus ground-water recharge in December 1976-February 1977 had little effect on streamflows. The March and May 1977 direct runoff plus ground-water recharge values resulted in significant increases of streamflow.

The water level in well 30/5-5E2 (27 ft deep) showed rapid response to direct runoff plus ground-water recharge (usually in less than 1 month). This is as expected because the water table in the area around this well is generally less than 6 ft deep. The water level in well 30/4-3H1 (105 ft deep) showed a much slower (about 3 months) and more subdued response.

C£

ID

GOUJ:n

S

~ 5

§i oUJ

c

1 1 AA Mission Ck. Basin >< Tulalip Ck. Basin ' 1976

Average annual net ^1975ground-water ^

recharge s 5c

/ S>> ...

_ ^^/^ ~

1977 j<u

«+- <u <+- i en o ~a i- C C 033 3 JCs- o u

i- <i> 4-> en t.o <U to J-t- 3 <U i- r -4-> "OQ.rO

10 20 30

DIRECT RUNOFF PLUS GROUND-WATER RECHARGE, IN INCHES

FIGURE 19. Relationship of direct runoff plus ground- water recharge, in inches, to net ground-water recharge in the reservation.

47

Direct Surface-water

GROUND-WATER RESERVOIR

Surface-water flow onto

I reservation

Subsurface flow onto reservation

|_ _ _ _Reservation boundaries _ _ _

Water Budget

Inflow PrecipitationSurface water"

2 Subsurface

(ft3/s) 103 13 4

Outflow Evapotranspiration(from land surface and unsaturated zone) (from ground-water)3Surface-water Subsurface

120

575

40

18

120

1 Includes estimated flows at sites 2 and 13. Does not include main stem of Quilceda Creek.

2 Based on 7 mi 2 of basin off the reserva tion, with subsurface flow rate equal to net ground-water recharge rate.

3 Assumes 6 mi 2 of shallow water table where actual ET equals PET (an additional 11.8 inches of ET).

4 Includes calculated flows at sites 2, 3, 4, 12, and 20, and estimated flow from 9.2 miles of ungaged area.

5 Net ground-water recharge plus ground- water inflow minus ground-water ET.

FIGURE 20. Flow diagram and water budget of the hydrologicsystem in the study area.

48

U_ CD U_ I CSLo o <:

ZD o ooO LLJ LiJce: oc: DICD o

oc: zOO UJ > <

oUJex. => \ i i _j <:

UJ 00 CD UJ

<c oOoo

TTIj I I I J I I M I 1 I

Site 120

I cr>1 1 i c\Juj cr.

zu. 313i i O

,o 312UJ > 01 , Q CD 311

UJ

LU UJ _J OO

o:I O <C £Q

919089888786

30/4-3H1 _

I I I

30/5-5E2 _

1974 1975 1976 1977

7980818283

UJ CO

z <:i i Q

« 1 1 i _J Ouj <:

00o:UJ O

FIGURE 21. Relationships between direct runoff plus ground- water recharge, surface-water discharge, and ground-water levels.

49

Potential For Further Development

Of primary concern to those responsible for water management in the study area is the potential for increased ground-water withdrawals and the associated consequences, and the potential for aquiculture development.

Because the hydrologic system in the study area has never been significantly stressed (except, perhaps, in the vicinity of the tribal well field), its reaction to potential future stresses imposed by man can be estimated only qualitatively. Any stress will produce a response by the system that is consistent with the hydrologic equation,

Inflow = outflow + change in storage.

A change in any item in the equation will cause one or both of the other items to change. Although the equation is simple, the types and magnitudes of responses may be complex.

Surface Water

As of 1978, there was no significant development of the reservation's surface water. The Tulalip Tribe's standby public-supply system on the east fork of Tulalip Creek had not been used since the installation of a ground-water supply system in August 1975. The tribal fish hatchery has been in operation at the mouth of Tulalip Creek for many years and will probably be greatly expanded in the near future. The hatchery water use is nonconsumptive.

The calculated low flows (table 3) for Tulalip (site 20) and Quilceda (site 2) Creeks show that relatively large minimum flows can be expected even in very dry years (7-day 5-percent probability low flows of 4.9 and 1.6 ft3/s, respectively), with little variation from mean conditions (7-day 50-percent probability low flows of 5.5 and 1.8 ft3/s respectively). The Mission Creek basin (site 12) has small, highly variable low flows (7-day 5-percent and 50-percent probability low flows of 0.4 and 0.7 ft3/s, respectively).

For fish-rearing purposes, the crucial period is generally from December to March. During the December-March periods of the 3 years of gaging at Tulalip Creek (site 20) and Mission Creek (site 12), the lowest 1-day mean flows were 5.4 ft3/s and 1.2 ft3/s, respectively.

The quality of water in the Tulalip and Mission Creek basins is generally good either for fish-rearing or for public supply, with the exception of high coliform-bacteria counts (requiring treatment before use as public supply) and some instances of relatively high total-phosphorus concentrations. The Quilceda Creek basin has water of poorer quality (higher in coliform bacteria and total phosphorus), but possibly adequate for fish-rearing.

50

Ground Water

The four areas of the reservation that had significant ground-water development as of 1978 (see section on existing ground-water development) will probably experience further, and perhaps rapid, ground-water development in the future. The undeveloped parts of the reservation (as of 1978) may be developed in the near future, but assessments of ground-water resources in these areas are not possible until more data become available.

Listed below are some general considerations regarding further development of the ground-water reservoir in each of the four developed areas. These considerations and listed related factors, both favorable and unfavorable, are based primarily on hydrologic factors and do not take into account any associated economic or legal factors.

1. Easternmost area (Marysville trough and eastern edge of Tulalip plateau).

a. The sand and silt aquifer (unit 3) is capable of supplying a population density several times greater than that of 1978.

(1) The most efficient method of development of the aquifer (if continued) probably would be as at present, with large-diameter wells, each serving one or two households.

(2) The major problem with intensive use of this aquifer is the potential for contamination, primarily from septic tanks. A water-quality monitoring program should be considered for this aquifer, with or without further development. Digging future wells to greater depths and installing sanitary seals would lessen the contamination potential.

b. In the northern part of this area, where the sand aquifer (unit 5) is found beneath the surficial materials of the Marysville trough, large yields may be attainable.

(1) The few wells drilled into the sand aquifer have specific capacities of about 2.5 gal/min/ft and water levels of 20 to 51 ft above land surface. Available drawdown in these wells ranges from 116 to 180 ft. Based on these data, a yield of about 180 gal/min may be attainable from a single 6-inch-diameter well (assuming use of one-half the available drawdown). However, the available specific-capacity data are of poor quality, and the aquifer has not yet been sufficiently stressed to allow for an estimate of long-term effects.

(2) The areal extent of this aquifer is not known. It extends north of the reservation at least 1 mi, southward at least as far as 30/5-6J4, and eastward at least to 30/5-5M5. The eastern boundary is probably not more than 1/2 mi east of the base of the Tulalip plateau. Test wells 30/5-7R1 and 18Q1, drilled 1 and 2 mi south, respectively, of the known southern extent did not encounter the aquifer. The aquifer may be present at very localized areas at any of the untested places along the base of the plateau.

51

(3) This aquifer should be safe from septic-tank contamination, except for a slight possibility along the eastern edge of the plateau where the covering of till (unit 4) may be thin in places.

2. Southernmost area (Priest Point area).

a. The sand unit (unit 5) is the only significant aquifer known in the area. The relatively intense existing development (the greatest well density of the four developed areas) has not caused any observable decline in water levels in the aquifer. The small public supply systems (less than 50 homes) operate on one or two wells, each with no reported shortages. The aquifer is probably capable of supplying a population in the Priest Point area several times greater than the present one.

b. A freshwater-saltwater zone of diffusion apparently exists beneath (or in the lower parts of) the aquifer. Increased pumping from the aquifer may result in induced saltwater encroachment and, therefore, in severe deterioration of water quality. This danger can be lessened if the future wells are drilled as far as possible from the shoreline and no deeper than necessary. With or without future development, a water-quality monitoring program to warn of saltwater-encroachment problems should be considered.

3. Westernmost area (the shoreline area north of Sunny Shores to Hermosa Point).

a. There the ground-water resources are less predictable than in any of the other developed areas. The clay-and-silt unit (unit 6) is the primary source of water. The water-bearing properties of the unit vary greatly from place to place. In most of the area, wells tapping the unit will probably yield at least a single-household supply, but at unpredictable depths. The underlying sand-and-gravel aquifer (unit 7) has been tapped by only two wells, therefore its areal extent is not known. Future supplies may be available from this unit, but will require deep wells (probably 400 ft or more). Even with rather small specific capacities, these future wells would probably be quite productive because they would have several hundred feet of available drawdown.

b. Because many wells in the area are drilled to depths far below sea level, there is a potential problem of saltwater encroachment. However, existing data show no evidence of encroachment. Well 30/4-17Kl, which is open from 307 to 314 ft below sea level, has a water level more than 100 ft below sea level when pumped. However, chloride concentrations in water from the well have generally been 8 mg/L or less. There has been no pattern of increase in chloride concentrations during the period of record (1967-78). Establishment of a monitoring network in the area to detect evidence of saltwater encroachment should be considered.

52

4. North-central area (including the Tribal well field).

a. The sand unit (unit 5) is apparently present beneath the entire area. Only the drillers' log of well 30/4-1 Ml gives any indication that lateral variations in the unit might result in poorly productive areas. Further development of the unit is possible.

(1) The wells in the northern part of the area (both public and single-domestic supplies) have shown no evidence of declining water levels resulting from pumping.

(2) The tribal well field, where the withdrawal of water is greater than in any other part of the reservation, has shown evidence of declining water levels (see fig. 22). An average annual rate of decline of 2.5 ft/yr was observed for the period from August 1975 through June 1978. About 1.0 ft/yr was probably due to the abnormally low natural recharge rate during the period (based on water-level data from well 30/4-3H1), and the remaining 1.5 ft/yr was probably due to pumping. The cone of depression around the well field (the lowering of water levels due to pumping) will continue to expand until enough recharge is intercepted to equal the pumping rate. At that time the cone will stabilize.

The recharge area for the well field is not well defined, but probably totals about 4 mi2. The 1978 rate of water use from the well field is calculated to be about 1.4 in./mi2 of recharge basin. The average annual net ground-water recharge rate is about 7.4 in., therefore the well field was withdrawing about 19 percent of the water available annually. As a gross estimate, it can be assumed that the cone will expand to cover about 19 percent of the recharge area. With the data available, it is not known if the cone can expand that far without lowering water levels in the well field below minimum levels required by the present (1978) pumping system. Assuming a pessimistic view that the cone cannot expand far enough, continued pumping from the well field at the present (1978) rate will result in a useful life of the well field, in its present form, of about 15-20 years. The life of the well field can be extended by drilling additional wells, outside the present well field, to increase the area of recharge that can be intercepted. A minimum of interference between wells would probably be realized if any new wells were installed to the northwest or southeast of the present cluster of wells.

Water levels in the well field should be checked at least once a month in order to accurately forecast future problems.

(3) Withdrawals from the tribal well field may have an adverse effect upon flows in Tulalip Creek, by intercepting water that would naturally discharge to the creek as springflow. At the 1978 rate of withdrawal no adverse effect can be clearly identified. With increased withdrawals in the future, some decrease in flow in Tulalip Creek may become apparent.

b. The clay-and-silt unit (unit 6) and the sand-and-gravel unit (unit 7) may underlie much of the area and could prove to be productive.

53

+ ID

+ 1

0 +5 0 -5 -in -15

-20

-25

i i

i i

i i

i i

j

-

Pum

ping

xv

August

1

"~

~

~"~

~~

. -

_. -_

_

i

ND

JF

M

AM

JJ

1974

19

75

~~

~ --__

30/_

4Z10

_L1

^^ """

^"^^^^ -

/ \ /\

\/

~ ~

- - - J

O/4

-1Q

L4

bega

n ,

1975

__

^~

~A

30/4

-10L3

v

"~--

~~

^_

___ ^- \^\-^^

30/4

-10U

______ _

^

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

I 1

1 1

1 1

I 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

V'l III

1 1

I 1

1

AS

ON

DJF

MA

MJJA

SO

N

DjF

MA

MJJA

SO

ND

J

FM

AM

J

1976

19

77

1978

FIGURE 22. Water-level fluctuations in wells 30/4-10L1-4,

in th

e Tribal well fi

eld.

REFERENCES CITED

Anderson, A.C., and others, 1947, Soil Survey, Snohomish County, Washing ton: U.S. Department of Agriculture, series 1937, no. 19, 76 p.

Bortleson, G. C., Dion, N. P., McConnell, J. B., and Nelson, L. M., 1976, Reconnaissance data on lakes in Washington: State of Washington Department of Ecology Water-Supply Bulletin 43, v. 2, 424 p.

Cummans, J. E., Collings, M. R., and Nassar, E. G., 1975, Magnitude and and frequency of floods in Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 74-336, 46 p.

Dion, N. P., 1979, Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of Ross Lake, Snohomish County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Open-File Report 78-44, 27 p.

Drost, B. W., 1977, Preliminary assessment of the water resources of the Tulalip Indian Reservation, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 76-493, 89 p.

1979, Progress report on water resources of the Tulalip Indian Reser vation, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Open-File Report 78-31, 27 p.

Hall, J. B., and Othberg, K. L., 1974, Thickness of unconsolidated sedi ments, Puget lowland, Washington: State of Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Geologic Map GM-12, 3 p.

Newcomb, R. C., 1952, Ground-water resources of Snohomish County, Wash ington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1135, 133 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1970, Irrigation water requirements: Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division, Technical Release no. 21 (rev. 2), 79 p.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, 1971, 1970 Census of popula tion: U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 32 p.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, 1960, Climatography of the United States No. 11-39, Climatic Summary of the United States - Supplement for 1931-1952: U.S. Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C., 79 p.

1965, Climatography of the United States No. 86-39, Decennial census of United States climate - Climatic summary of the United States - Supplement for 1951-1960: U.S. Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C., 92 p.

1966-73, Climatological data, Washington: v. 70-77.

55

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1974, The relationships of phos phorus and nitrogen to the trophic state of northeast and north-central lakes and reservoirs: EPA Working Paper no. 23, 28 p.

- 1975, National interim primary drinking water regulations: Federal Register, v. 40, no. 248, p. 59566-59588.

. 1977, National secondary drinking water regulations: Proposed regu lations: Federal Register, v. 42, no. 62, p. 17143-17146.

U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1974-77, Climato- logical data, Washington: v. 78-81.

1977, Climatological Data: v. 81 no. 1-9, Asheville, North Carolina, 21 p.

U.S. Weather Bureau, 1935-65, Climatological data, Washington: v. 39-69.

Washington State Department of Ecology, 1973, Water quality standards: Washington Administrative Code, ch. 173-201 WAC, 19 p.

Wolcott, E. E., 1973, Lakes of Washington: Washington State Department of Ecology, Water-Supply Bulletin 14, v. 1, 619 p.

56

U-OL S 3 1 9 V 1 X I 0 N 3 d d V

TABLE 10.--Mean daily discharges at Mission and Tulalip Creek gaging stations during October 1974-September 1977

[All values in cubic feet per second]

EXPLANATIONGage heights (water level) at continuous-recording gages were automatically recorded once every hour. Manual discharge measurements were made once a month. The daily discharges were calculated by calibrating the recorded gage heights with the measured discharges.

Site 12. Mission Creek near Tulalip (station 12157250). Drainage area = 7.92 mi'2.

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

TOTALMEANMAXMINCFSMIN.AC-FT

WTR YR

Oct

1.62.02.52.01.7

1.61.51.51.51.5

1.51.51.51.51.5

1.61.61.61.52.3

3.23.02.32.02.0

2.02.13.03.73.43.9

64.02.063.91.5

.26

.30127

1975

1974Nov

5.04.23.22.52.5

2.34.75.94.43.7

3.73.42.72.12.0

2.12.75.05.3

11

147.95.64.46.3

6.94.43.73.23.0

137.84.59

142.0

.58

.65273

TOTAL

1975Dec

3.03.43.76.66.6

5.65.04.44.75.9

6.65.35.04.44.7

6.312119.29.2

2217107.96.9

7.517159.98.27.2

251.28.10

223.01.021.18

498

2306.6

Jan

7.26.96.9

1116

1413141311

9.69.9

111211

9.919302016

141111119.2

7.56.96.66.35.95.6

356.411.5305.61.451.67

707

MEAN 6

Feb

5.35.05.35.04.7

4.49.6

14119.6

1120242518

1714181737

2418161714

12119.6----

391 .514.0374.41.771.84

111

.32 MAX

Mar

1532261814

1211101616

121111119.6

1518181614

1214121211

109.28.27.97.97.5

417.313.5327.51.701.96

828

37

Apr

7.27.98.29.28.9

8.27.56.65.65.9

5.95.95.35.65.6

5.35.65.37.27.2

6.65.65.37.9

19

15119.68.58.2--

230.87.69

195.3

.971.08

458

MIN 1.2

May

7.26.98.98.27.5

7.26.35.95.65.6

18138.26.15.0

4.33.84.34.34.3

3.83.23.03.63.4

3.02.82.82.62.52.2

173.55.60

182.2

.71

.81344

CFSM

Jun

2.02.22.52.52.5

2.32.01.91.91.8

1.92.21.61.41.6

1.93.03.42.62.3

2.32.02.32.?2.8

4.15.85.33.83.0--

77.12.575.81.4

.32

.36153

.80

Jul

2.32.01.91.81.5

1.61.51.41.41.4

1.92.02.01.92.3

2.32.32.52.62.3

2.01.91.61.61.5

1.51.41.51.92.01.8

57.61.862.61.4

.23

.27114

IN 10.83

Aug

2.52.01.81.61.5

1.41.51.51.41.4

1.41.91.81.21.3

1.43.25.5

105.8

3.43.29.27.64.8

3.22.02.03.03.43.6

95.53.08

101.2

.39

.45189

AC-FT

Sep

3.22.82.32.01.9

1.61.51.51.51.5

1.51.51.51.51.5

1.81.91.81.81.6

1.41.51.61.61.6

1.61.71.82.32.6--

53.91.803.21.4

.23

.25107

4580

58

TABLE 10.--Continued

Site 12. Mission Creek near Tulalip (station 12157250) continued

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031


CAL YRWTR YR

Oct

2.01.82.53.54.5

5.54.53.03.27.6

5.83.23.02.82.8

3.27.9

25158.9

6.35.24.33.44.2

7.96.65.15.37.36.4

177.75.73

251.8

.72

.83352

19751976

1975Nov

4.84.24.44.24.4

8.8118.96.75.5

4.84.14.39.2

16

1513117.66.1

5.35.08.2

2320

1817131012

--

285.59.52

234.11.201.34

566

TOTALTOTAL

1976Dec

1619203224

1717211916

1412121211

9.99.28.57.67.6

7.07.3

111614

131412121412

437.114.1327.01.782.05

867

2753.92642.9

Jan

9.99.28.9

1111

111112119.9

11119.9

1017

3523191613

1214171211

1111109.28.58.5

394.012.7358.51.601.85

781

MEAN 7MEAN 7

Feb

7.97.67.37.06.4

6.17.36.46.15.8

5.55.86.46.76.1

6.16.46.46.47.3

6.75.85.55.87.0

8.29.9

1312 --

204.97.07

135.5

.89

.96406

.54 MAX

.22 MAX

Mar

108.57.36.76.1

5.85.85.85.56.2

7.86.95.75.55.0

4.95.35.46.77.1

7.18.5

131317

131112121021

265.68.57

214.91.081.25

527

3735

Apr

1713119.88.8

8.27.58.38.77.5

9.5118.97.8

11

119.18.8

1333

2620161517

13119.88.57.6--

366.812.2337.51.541.72

728

MIN 1.2MIN 1.0

May

6.87.47.36.67.6

7.36.05.14.54.5

5.76.65.34.84.3

4.13.63.03.02.5

3.02.63.63.23.8

3.84.14.84.54.54.3

148.24.787.62.5

.60

.70294

CFSMCFSM

Jun

6.78.98.25.54.1

2.83.43.02.82.6

2.83.03.43.83.4

8.98.24.63.23.3

2.82.62.22.12.8

2.32.01.41.21.4--

113.43.788.91.2

.48

.53225

.95 IN

.91 IN

Jul

1.61.42.11.71.7

1.71.63.02.32.2

1.91.81.91.41.1

1.31.11.21.31.2

1.41.41.51.31.3

1.21.21.11.21.41.0

47.51.533.01.0

.19

.2294

12.9312.41

Aug

1.21.21.82.21.9

1.93.28.96.42.8

1.51.61.82.22.6

6.74.83.04.19.2

6.13.22.83.06.1

137.04-. 83.42.82.5

123.73.99

131.2

.50

.58245

AC-FTAC-FT

bep

2.32.52.52.22.5

4.54.33.42.52.3

2.32.32.53.84.3

3.42.82.62.52.0

1.92.02.22.32.3

2.52.22.02.01.6--

78.52.624.51.6

.33

.37156

54605240

59


Site 12. Mission Creek near Tulalip (station 12157250 continued

1976 1977Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031


CAL YRWTR YR

Oct

1.82.02.32.02.5

1.81.51.71.72.3

2.22.31.92.02.0

2.12.01.92.02.2

2.12.42.32.73.5

4.03.66.07.04.53.3

81.62.637.01.5

.33

.38162

19761977

Nov

2.92.62.32.52.8

2.63.23.23.23.2

3.43.23.03.04.1

4.54.85.04.83.6

3.83.63.64.15.3

3.63.43.23.02.8--

104.33.485.32.3

.44

.49207

TOTALTOTAL

Dec

2.82.83.03.03.0

4.19.68.25.84.3

3.83.63.43.03.0

3.33.23.63.43.2

3.03.28.37.85.7

6.66.35.14.43.93.6

138.04.459.62.8

.56

.65274

2066.501382.90

Jan

3.33.33.33.02.6

2.11.81.61.41.2

1.33.15.87.26.2

5.35.37.9

207.5

5.64.84.44.13.9

3.73.53.53.63.43.6

137.24.43

201.2

.56

.64272

MEANMEAN

Feb

4.14.23.93.53.3

3.13.13.02.83.7

3.83.93.73.53.2

3.33.13.23.13.1

4.44.64.03.73.4

3.53.54.6--__--

100.33.584.62.8

.45

.47199

5.653.79

Mar

6.38.5

20137.8

6.37.49.4

1310

7.36.45.45.36.7

6.25.26.06.95.9

5.24.64.64.23.9

5.17.66.95.24.45.6

220.37.11

203.9

.901.03

437

MAX 35MAX 20

Apr

108.16.05.04.4

3.93.73.73.83.8

3.63.34.24.44.3

3.53.33.43.63.2

3.13.13.23.22.7

3.63.63.02.72.6--

120.04.00

102.6

.51

.56238

MIN 1.MIN .

May

2.02.86.6

1615

116.55.23.73.4

13146.95.76.2

1011128.45.9

4.84.24.16.05.2

5.84.23.83.63.56.7

217.27.01

162.0

.891.02

431

0 CFSM13 CFSM

Jun

169.15.85.04.6

3.52.82.21.92.0

2.01.41.31.41.7

1.61.51.31.31.4

1.2.90

1.0.75.46

.23

.26

.18

.13

.17

73.082.44

16.13.31.34

145

.71

.48

Jul

.341.11.11.71.8

1.2.75.75.72.81

.861.31.21.21.2

1.31.71.41.31.0

.85

.80

.69

.67

.68

.58

.671.32.51.1

.44

33.011.062.5

.34

.13

.1665

IN 9.71IN 6.49

Aug

.39

.36

.68

.33

.52

.53

.45

.52

.41

.68

.73

.71

.44

.49

.31

.28

.32

.33

.34

.42

.45

.5616129.3

7.56.05.14.03.52.9

76.552.47

16.28.31.36

152

AC-FTAC-FT

Sep

2.31.61.41.91.4

.98

.792.71.1

.51

.57

.42

.552.7

.95

.73

.861.01.22.1

4.83.95.7

139.2

5.13.93.53.33.2--

81.362.71

13.42.34.38

161

41002740

60

TABLE 10. Continued

Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040). Drainage area = 15.4 mi 2 . 1974 1975

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031


Oct

5.25.46.05.45.2

5.25.25.25.25.2

5.25.25.25.25.2

5.25.25.25.47.1

6.35.65.45.45.4

5.66.17.17.36.68.3

176.45.698.35.2

.37

.43350

Nov

8.36.86.66.36.6

6.38.98.17.38.3

7.37.17.37.27.2

6.67.6

119.2

19

2214121215

1311111110

--

294.09.80

226.3

.64

.71583

Dec

1011121814

1312111215

1412121212

1522161414

2816131212

132518131212

44514.42810

.941.07

883

Jan

1312122321

1816181513

1214171614

1327312427

2524242321

201919181816

58318.831121.221.41

1160

Feb

1515151414

1424221918

2234313427

2825233048

3833313429

272625

-- --

71525.548141.661.73

1420

Mar

3348373224

2220192926

2219201917

2632312923

2023222119

181615141413

72323.348131.511.75

1430

Apr

1313141616

1513121313

1313131212

1111101412

1110101726

1715131211

--

40113.42610

.87

.97795

May

1010151211

1111109.7

10

281411108.9

8.18.39.28.98.1

7.87.88.17.87.3

7.17.36.86.86.66.6

304.29.81

286.6

.64

.73603

Jun

6.46.16.46.86.8

6.86.46.15.95.9

5.95.65.46.16.1

6.67.87.16.66.4

6.66.67.16.88.3

1026118.87.1--

225.57.52

265.4

.49

.54447

Jul

6.46.16.16.15.9

5.45.65.65.65.6

6.86.66.46.46.6

6.16.66.66.66.4

6.15.96.16.16.1

5.95.96.86.66.46.1

191.56.186.85.4

.40

.46380

Aug

5.96.46.15.95.9

6.16.66.16.66.4

6.66.46.66.66.6

7.38.1

11128.1

7.18.3

12107.3

7.16.87.18.17.3

10

232.47.50

125.9

.49

.56461

Sep

8.37.36.66.66.4

6.16.16.46.46.1

6.15.96.16.16.4

7.17.36.66.46.4

6.46.46.46.66.6

6.66.66.66.66.8--

196.36.548.35.9

.42

.47389

WTR YR 1975 TOTAL 4487.3 MEAN 12.3 MAX 48 MIN 5.2 CFSM .80 IN 10.84 AC-FT 8900

Note.--No gage height record Mar 5 to Apr 9.

61

TABLE 10. Continued

Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040 continued

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031


CAL YRWTR YR

Oct

6.76.77.49.1

10

157.16.79.1

10

7.46.76.76.38.6

1021381413

108.67.46.7

12

169.58.2

11119.1

329.010.6386.3

.69

.79653

19751976

1975Nov

7.17.49.17.18.2

201512108.2

9.17.47.8

1828

191612

9.18.2

7.48.2

163419

2518121017

-~

405.313.534

7.1.88.98

804

TOTALTOTAL

1976Dec

2026213738

3540464036

3330312928

2725232221

2121303425

282824242521

88928.746201.862.15

1760

5195.25508.6

Jan

1918182224

2222252121

2121192339

5041373229

2632332827

252524222120

80726.050181.691.95

1600

MEANMEAN

Feb Mar

2029191716

1616171615

1515171716

1616161618

1615151618

20242722

506172715

11

1000

14.215.1

1917161515

1414141416

1815141413

1314141816

1420282827

222022211943

567.4 18.3

4313

.13 1.19

.22 1.371120

MAX 48MAX 52

Apr

3934312827

2524252522

3026222228

2722212452

3831272830

2422201917

--

81027.052171.751.96

1610

MIN 5.4MIN 5.2

May

1615121013

109.18.67.88.2

118.68.27.87.4

7.16.76.36.36.7

6.36.36.77.18.2

7.19.5

118.29.18.6

273.98.84

166.3

.57

.66543

CFSMCFSM

Jun

1814107.87.1

7.16.76.36.36.3

6.77.88.26.79.5

18117.88.68.6

6.77.46.77.17.4

6.35.95.95.55.9

247.38.24

185.5

.54

.60491

.92

.98

Jul

5.95.96.37.16.3

5.55.97.85.96.3

5.96.36.35.55.5

5.25.55.25.25.5

5.96.36.35.55.2

5.25.25.25.55.95.9

181.15.847.85.2

.38

.44359

IN 12.55IN 13.31

Aug

5.25.27.47.86.7

6.79.5

149.17.8

6.76.36.77.89.1

169.17.1

1221

107.47.47.8

14

17108.67.47.16.7

284.69.18

215.2

.60

.69565

AC-FTAC-FT

Sep

6.36.76.36.37.8

118.27.16.35.9

5.55.95.5

108.6

7.16.76.76.76.7

7.17.17.47.87.4

6.76.35.95.95.5

208.46.95

115.5

.45

.50413

1030010930

62


Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040)--continued

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031


CAL YRWTR YR

Oct

5.97.47.86.76.7

6.35.55.96.37.4

7.16.76.35.96.3

7.16.76.76.77.1

6.77.47.18.6

12

13101515118.2

246.57.95

155.5

.52

.60489

19761977

1976Nov

7.87.87.17.47.8

7.87.87.87.87.8

8.27.87.87.8

11

1011119.59.5

9.59.18.6

1013

107.16.76.76.7

257.98.60

136.7

.56

.62512

TOTALTOTAL

1977Dec

6.76.77.16.76.7

8.61914108.6

8.27.87.47.47.1

7.48.29.17.87.1

7.47.4

161210

13118.67.88.67.1

280.59.05

196.7

.59

.68556

4670.23195.4

Jan

6.76.76.76.76.3

6.16.05.85.65.4

5.811111311

1011161310

8.27.47.47.16.7

6.36.36.36.76.77.1

250.08.06

165.4

.52

.60496

MEANMEAN

Feb

7.87.47.16.76.4

6.36.26.05.87.7

8.59.18.17.97.6

7.37.17.17.17.4

109.18.27.47.4

8.27.8

11-- --

213.77.63

115.8

.50

.52424

12.8 MAX8.75 MAX

Mar

1315281511

1012162213

1110101012

1110111412

111110109.5

131612111015

394.512.7289.5

.83

.95782

5239

Apr

2213111010

9.58.68.69.18.2

8.27.88.27.47.4

7.17.48.67.87.4

7.17.19.1

1213

3915108.87.6--

316.010.539

7.1.68.76

627

MIN 5.2MIN 3.7

May

6.68.9

152423

129.17.97.37.6

22149.69.5

15

2117161310

9.89.6

111411

129.79.08.38.0

18

388.912.5246.6

.81

.94771

CFSMCFSM

Jun

2714111110

9.58.57.77.36.7

6.46.36.36.46.5

6.46.56.06.16.5

6.66.96.36.16.5

6.26.06.36.86.7--

240. 58.02

276.0

.5?.

.58477

.83

.57

Jul

6.8117.87.45.9

5.95.55.75.45.7

6.07.16.25.85.6

6.48.36.15.75.6

5.65.65.65.45.3

5.45.35.36.46.05.4

191.26.17

115.3

.40

.46379

IN 11.28IN 7.72

Aug

7.75.44.34.14.6

4.34.44.34.64.2

4.33.74.04.04.4

4.54.24.24.64.7

4.85.19.9

1613

149.88.49.29.57.3

197.56.37

163.7

.41

.48392

AC-FTAC-FT

Sep

6.46.57.27.36.9

6.15.85.85.45.4

5.45.35.35.45.5

5.75.55.66.06.6

9.36.9

112211

7.76.58.29.17.4--

218.27.27

225.3

.47

.53433

92606340

CFSM - cubic feet per second per square mile [(ft3/s)/mi2] of basin area. IN. - inches of water if spread evenly over the entire basin. AC-FT - acre-feet of water. CAL YR - calendar year. WTR YR - Water year.

63

TABLE 11.--Daily maximum and minimum water temperatures at Mission and Tulalip Creek gaging stations during October 1974-September 1976

[All values in degrees Celsius]

Site 12. Mission Creek near Tulalip (station 12157250)

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH

1974October

Max

_____-

__-_-- --

--

9.09.09.09.09.5

9.08.07.07.06.5

8.59.09.09.08.09.0

__

Min

__-__-__

__ -- --

----

8.08.08.08.09.0

8.07.06.56.56.0

6.58.58.58.08.08.0

__

NovemberMax

8.58.56.58.08.5

9.0-- --

__

--

__-- --

__------

__-- _-

__

Min

8.56.56.56.58.0

8.5 -- --

__--------

__ __--

__-- --

__----__ --

__

DecemberMax

__6.06.57.08.0

7.06.56.57.07.0

7.06.05.55.56.0

8.08.06.56.58.0

8.56.04.53.54.5

4.54.53.54.04.04.0

8.5

Min

__5.06.06.57.0

6.56.56.06.56.5

6.05.55.05.55.5

6.06.56.06.06.5

6.04.53.03.03.5

4.03.53.03.53.52.0

2.0

JanuaryMax

4.04.04.55.05.0

4.54.54.53.52.0

2.03.53.53.54.0

5.06.56.56.56.0

5.05.06.56.56.0

5.53.53.02.02.02.0

6.5

Min

3.03.54.04.54.0

4.54.03.52.02.0

1.01.03.53.53.5

4.05.06.56.05.0

4.04.54.55.55.5

3.52.02.01.52.01.5

1.0

1975February

Max

2.03.03.53.53.0

3.03.53.54.54.5

4.56.56.05.03.5

4.04.55.55.55.5

3.55.56.06.55.5

5.55.56.5__ --

6.5

Min

1.02.03.03.02.0

1.53.02.03.04.5

3.53.55.03.F3.0

3.03.54.55.03.5

2.03.54.55.03.5

4.04.55.5__ --

1.0

MarchMax

8.08.5-___

5.56.58.08.06.5

6.56.06.56.06.5

7.06.56.58.08.0

6.57.08.08.08.0

7.06.58.08.09.09.5

9.5

Min

6.58.0

4.03.55.56.05.5

4.55.55.55.55.5

5.56.06.06.06.5

6.55.56.55.54.5

5.04.04.55.56.56.0

3.5

64



1975

Apri 1

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH

1975wateryear

Max

9.08.08.58.08.5

10.010.011.011.012.0

13.011.510.010.511.0

10.510.510.510.011.0

12.010.511.010.09.5

9.510.512.013.514.0

14.0

Max21.0

Min

5.56.55.56.05.5

5.06.06.08.07.0

5.08.59.07.08.5

10.09.09.59.08.0

7.09.09.09.08.5

8.08.08.58.59.0

5.0

Min1.0

MayMax

14.513.511.011.011.0

11.514.515.516.515.5

14.516.016.516.515.5

15.516.015.013.015.0

14.514.013.514.515.5

15.016.016.518.019.019.5

19.5

Min

10.011.010.09.59.5

10.09.510.011.513.5

13.012.011.513.013.5

13.013.012.010.59.5

11.012.011.513.010.5

13.012.013.014.014.514.5

9.5

JuneMax

20.019.516.515.516.5

17.016.516.018.018.0

19.520.018.517.016.0

14.514.515.517.016.5

15.015.018.016.514.5

15.514.514.516.518.5

20.0

Min

15.516.014.514.514.5

14.514.013.513.015.0

15.015.516.516.014.5

13.513.013.014.015.0

14.513.514.014.514.0

13.013.513.512.013.5

12.0

JulyMax

18.518.518.520.521.0

21.021.020.520.520.0

19.018.519.018.519.0

18.017.017.018.518.5

19.019.019.519.520.5

20.521.019.017.018.018.0

21.0

Min

15.015.515.515.517.0

18.518.519.018.518.5

18.016.016.016.516.5

16.516.016.016.016.0

15.515.515.516.517.0

16.517.017.016.015.515.5

15.0

AugustMax

17.018.019.019.518.5

18.016.017.017.017.0

18.018.018.018.517.0

16.018.017.016.017.0

17.016.014.514.515.5

16.516.516.015.516.016.0

19.5

Min

16.015.516.516.016.5

15.015.515.014.015.0

14.514.515.015.015.5

15. C15.516.015.515.5

16.014.514.014.014.0

15.016.015.514.515.015.0

14.0

SeptemberMax

15.015.014.515.015.5

16.015.015.515.515.5

15.516.016.015.514.5

14.014.514.013.513.5

13.514.013.514.014.0

13.513.013.013.012.0

16.0

Min

14.514.013.513.013.5

14.014.514.514.013.5

13.513.514.014.014.0

13.513.511.511.011.0

11.011.512.012.013.0

11.511.011.511.011.0

11.0

65

TABLE 11. Continued


Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH 13.5

1975October

Max

12.013.013.513.013.0

12.011.011.011.512.0

11.011.011.011.011.5

11.511.511.011.011.0

10.510.09.58.58.0

8.08.58.58.59.08.5

Min

10.511.513.012.012.0

11.010.510.511.011.0

10.510.010.510.511.0

11.011.010.510.510.5

10.09.58.57.08.0

7.08.08.08.08.58.5

NovemberMax

9.09.5

11.011.511.0

10.09.08.06.56.0

6.56.57.09.09.0

8.06.55.03.53.5

4.55.06.58.06.5

6.56.55.03.02.0

Min

8.59.09.5

10.510.0

9.08.06.56.06.0

6.06.06.57.08.0

6.55.03.53.03.0

3.04.55.06.56.0

6.05.03.00.51.0

DecemberMax

3.57.08.58.56.0

4.54.06.07.06.5

5.04.02.0

__

1.01.01.0

1.02.03.55.05.0

6.56.05.56.56.55.0

Min

2.03.57.06.04.5

3.03.04.06.05.0

4.02.01.5

__

1.00.51.0

0.51.02.03.54.5

5.05.05.05.55.03.0

JanuaryMax

3.01.53.04.55.0

4.54.55.05.05.0

5.04.54.05.06.5

8.08.07.06.04.0

3.04.04.54.04.0

4.56.07.06.56.56.0

Min

1.51.51.53.04.5

4.54.54.55.05.0

3.54.03.54.05.0

6.57.06.04.03.0

2.03.04.03.53.5

3.54.55.56.06.05.0

1976February

Max

5.04.55.04.53.0

1.52.03.03.54.0

4.55.06.06.05.5

6.06.05.55.55.0

5.06.06.06.05.5

5.55.04.54.0

Min

4.54.54.53.01.0

0.51.01.52.03.0

4.04.54.55.55.0

5.05.55.04.54.0

4.04.05.55.04.5

4.54.54.03.5

MarchMax

4.03.53.03.03.0

4.04.54.55.55.5

5.55.05.56.06.0

7.08.08.58.08.0

8.07.06.06.57.0

8.07.08.07.08.58.0

Min

3.02.01.51.51.5

1.53.53.04.05.0

4.04.04.04.54.0

5.06.57.06.56.0

6.56.06.06.05.5

6.06.06.06.06.56.5

7.0 11.5 0.5 8.5 0.5 8.0 1.5 6.0 0.5 8.5 1.5

66

TABLE 11. Continued


1976

April

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH

1976wateryear

Max

9.09.5

10.511.011.0

11.010.010.012.013.5

12.010.511.59.58.0

10.09.0

10.010.510.5

11.011.510.510.011.5

13.014.014.515.015.5

15.5

Max20.5

Min

5.56.07.08.08.0

9.08.09.59.0

10.0

10.59.08.58.06.5

6.58.07.08.58.5

8.59.09.59.08.5

9.09.5

10.511.012.0

5.5

Min0.5

MayMax

16.515.014.013.014.0

14.516.017.018.018.0

15.515.014.514.516.5

16.014.515.015.014.5

16.015.015.014.514.5

15.015.013.013.013.012.0

18.0

Min

13.513.012.011.511.0

11.011.013.013.014.0

13.012.012.010.511.0

13.012.011.513.013.5

12.013.513.013.011.5

13.012.011.011.510.511.0

10.5

June['.ax

14.014.016.015.016.5

16.016.016.016.515.5

15.014.014.516.516.0

15.018.519.519.017.0

17.017.016.015.015.5

17.018.019.017.018.0

--

19.5

Min

10.511.011.513.013.0

14.014.014.514.515.0

13.513.012.012.014.5

13.513.515.015.514.0

15.015.014.513.513.0

13.514.015.016.015.5

--

10.5

JulyMax

18.019.017.018.520.5

20.019.519.519.018.0

18.017.018.519.520.0

20.019.019.019.019.5

18.517.019.019.519.5

18.018.518.518.019.019.5

20.5

Min

15.514.516.016.016.5

18.518.017.017.015.5

16.016.015.015.515.5

16.516.015.015.017.0

16.515.015.016.515.5

16.014.014.016.015.016.5

14.0

AugustMax

18.519.018.517.017.0

17.016.516.017.017.0

17.017.016.517.017.0

16.016.516.516.016.0

16.515.515.516.516.5

15.515.517.016.516.516.5

19.0

Min

15.515.516.516.016.0

16.015.515.515.515.0

15.015.515.515.515.5

15.014.515.014.514.5

14.014.515.015.014.5

14.014.515.515.515.015.5

14.0

SeptemberMax

16.016.516.016.016.0

15.515.014.514.013.5

13.514.514.514.514.0

13.514.514.514.515.0

14.515.015.014.514.5

14.514.515.014.514.0

16.5

Min

15.514.514.515.015.5

14.013.512.012.012.0

12.013.013.014.012.0

12.013.513.513.513.5

13.514.514.513.513.5

13.513.513.513.512.0

12.0

67


Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH

Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040)

1974 1975October

Max

__ --

__ --

__ _- --

9.59.09.09.5

10.5

10.09.08.07.57.5

8.59.59.59.08.59.0

Min

__----

__-- ----

__--__

__7.58.08.09.5

9.07.57.06.56.5

7.08.09.08.57.58.5

NovemberMax

9.09.57.08.09.5

10.010.09.09.59.0

8.510.010.59.09.0

9.08.08.58.09.5

9.58.08.09.09.0

6.56.55.09.55.0--

Min

8.57.06.57.08.0

9.59.08.08.58.0

8.08.59.08.58.5

8.07.57.58.08.0

8.07.07.07.56.5

5.55.03.53.53.0

DecemberMax

6.07.57.58.08.5

7.07.57.56.05.5

5.57.08.07.56.5

7.08.58.05.53.0

3.55.04.53.53.0

3.54.53.04.04.55.0

Min

4.56.06.07.57.0

6.06.06.05.55.0

5.05.57.06.56.5

6.57.05.52.52.5

2.53.53.03.03.0

3.03.02.52.54.04.0

JanuaryMax

5.05.05.04.5

__--

3.02.5

2.03.03.54.04.0

5.57.07.57.06.5

5.04.57.06.06.0

5.03.02.53.02.52.5

Min

4.54.54.54.0

__ --

2.52.0

2.02.03.03.53.0

4.05.57.06.05.0

3.54.54.56.05.0

3.01.52.01.52.52.0

FebruaryMax

2.53.54.54.03.0

3.03.53.55.04.5

3.57.06.55.03.0

4.54.55.05.55.0

4.56.56.56.55.5

5.56.07.5

Min

1.52.53.53.02.0

1.53.02.03.03.5

2.53.55.03.02.5

3.03.54.55.03.0

1.53.04.54.02.5

4.05.06.0 --

MarchMax

8.59.59.07.57.5

7.08.09.59.07.0

8.56.58.57.57.0

7.57.57.58.58.5

7.59.08.58.08.5

9.09.0

10.510.512.512.5

Min

7.07.55.53.53.0

2.53.07.07.04.5

3.55.55.06.06.0

5.55.56.56.56.5

6.05.06.55.54.5

5.54.05.07.08.06.5

10.5 3.0 8.5 2.5 7.5 1.5 7.5 1.5 12.5 2.5

68


1975wateryear

Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040) continued

1975

April

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

Max

10.59.58.58.5

10.5

12.013.011.512.514.0

14.513.011.011.012.0

11.011.011.010.512.5

14.012.012.510.510.5

10.512.014.515.516.5

__

Min

6.08.06.07.06.0

6.07.07.09.07.0

7.58.59.06.58.0

9.08.59.09.07.0

6.58.08.59.08.0

7.07.58.57.58.5--

MayMax

17.013.011.512.011.5

13.517.018.020.017.5

15.518.019.019.016.5

17.517.514.513.517.0

14.515.514.016.017.0

14.018.019.020.021.021.0

Min

9.510.59.08.59.0

9.58.59.5

11.513.5

12.511.511.513.013.5

13.012.511.510.09.0

10.511.510.09.59.5

11.512.012.012.513.514.0

JuneMax

21.518.016.515.016.5

18.017.016.519.017.5

20.521.017.517.515.5

13.515.015.518.515.0

14.017.020.014.514.0

15.017.0

--____--

Min

15.015.513.513.513.5

13.012.511.511.013.0

13.014.015.015.013.5

12.511.511.012.513.5

12.512.012.012.012.0

11.511.5

--______

JulyMax

__ ----

__-- --

18.0

17.019.5

17.017.017.020.019.0

19.019.520.019.5

21.521.519.018.018.518.5

Min

__

__

16.015.014.515.015.5

15.515.014.514.514.5

13.514.014.015.016.5

15.516.016.015.014.014.0

AugustMax

18.018.519.520.018.0

18.015.017.517.517.0

18.018.519.019.018.0

17.019.018.016.017.5

17.015.514.014.016.0

18.016.515. 516.016.016.5

Min

15.014.515.515.016.0

13.514.013.512.514.0

13.013.013.514.015.0

15.015.015.515.014.0

15.013.513.013.012.5

14.015.514.F14.014.014.0

SeptemberMax

15.015.015.016.016.5

17.015.016.016.016.0

16.517.017.016.014.5

13.514.514.514.514.5

14.515.013.514.014.0

14.013.512.513.013.0

-_

Min

13.012.511.511.012.0

12.514.013.012.512.0

12.012.511.513.013.0

13.012.510.510.510.5

10.511.012.011.512.0

11.010.511.010.010.0

__

MONTH 16.5

Max 21.5

6.0

Min 1.5

21.0 8.5 21.5 11.0 20.0 12.5 17.0 10.0

69


Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040)--continued

1975 1976

Day

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH

OctoberMax

13.513.513.013.513.5

12.010.011.511.012.0

11.010.011.010.512.0

11.012.011.011.011.0

10.09.59.07.07.5

7.08.08.08.59.08.0

13.5

Min

10.011.512.511.011.0

10.09.09.5

10.510.5

10.09.0

10.010.010.0

10.011.09.5

10.09.5

9.08.57.05.57.0

7.07.07.07.58.08.5

5.5

NovemberMax

9.09.5

13.012.512.0

9.08.07.06.56.0

6.06.57.59.58.0

7.06.03.52.03.0

4.55.07.08.06.0

6.56.53.51.01.5--

13.0

Min

8.08.59.5

11.09.0

8.07.06.05.55.0

5.06.06.07.57.0

6.03.52.01.52.0

2.54.05.05.54.0

6.03.51.00.00.5--

0.0

DecemberMax

5.08.08.58.05.0

2.55.07.07.06.0

__ --

__

1.51.51.5

2.03.54.06.56.0

8.06.56.08.07.05.0

Min

1.55.08.05.02.0

2.02.55.06.04.0

__ --

__

0.50.51.0

0.52.03.54.05.0

5.54.55.06.05.02.5

_

JanuaryMax

2.52.03.55.55.5

5.05.06.05.05.0

5.04.03.05.07.0

8.07.56.55.04.0

3.54.05.03.04.0

5.07.08.07.07.06.5

8.0

Min

1.51.52.03.55.0

4.54.55.04.54.5

4.03.03.03.05.0

7.06.55.03.52.5

1.53.53.02.53.0

4.05.06.05.56.04.5

1.5

FebruaryMax

4.54.56.04.02.0

2.03.03.54.04.0

4.56.07.56.05.0

6.56.05.55.06.0

5.07.57.06.06.5

6.05.54.54.5

7.5

Min

4.04.54.01.00.0

0.01.02.02.53.0

4.04.54.05.04.5

5.05.04.53.53.0

3.03.56.04.54.0

3.53.53.03.0

0.0

MarchMax

5.54.53.54.05.0

5.56.06.56.56.0

8.04.56.08.57.5

9.09.0

10.08.07.5

8.07.06.06.59.0

8.58.09.08.09.0

10.0

10.0

Min

3.01.50.51.01.0

1.53.02.54.55.0

3.03.53.54.03.5

5.06.57.07.05.0

6.05.05.05.04.5

5.55.55.55.56.55.5

0.5

70


Site 20. Tulalip Creek at Tulalip (station 12158040) continued

1976

12345

6789

10

1112131415

1617

^181920

2122232425

262728293031

MONTH 18.5 4.5 20.0 9.0 20.0 9.5 19.0 13.0 17.5 11.0

1976 wateryear Max Min

20.5 0.0

Apri 1Max

11.011.513.012.513.5

13.011.510.515.016.0

13.512.013.59.58.5

11.59.0

11.511.512.0

13.013.510.511.014.0

14.515.517.018.518.5

Min

4.54.56.06.56.5

9.07.09.58.0

10.0

10.08.08.07.06.0

5.57.57.08.58.0

7.58.08.59.08.0

8.09.0

10.511.512.5

MayMax

20.016.014.513.016.0

17.018.019.020.017.5

17.015.013.515.518.0

16.016.517.015.515.5

17.515.516.514.515.0

16.015.013.011.513.511.5

Min

13.513.012.011.010.5

10.010.512.012.013.0

11.511.511.09.0

10.0

11.510.59.5

11.011.5

10.511.511.512.010.5

11.511.010.010.09.09.5

JuneMax

15.014.515.516.517.0

16.016.515.517.016.0

14.012.516.017.015.0

15.019.020.017.517.5

16.018.015.515.017.0

18.019.019.017.018.0

Min

9.510.59.510.010.0

11.511.012.512.513.0

12.011.510.510.013.0

12.511.513.013.512.0

13.013.013.513.011.5

12.512.513.515.014.5

JulyMax

17.519.517.519.0

__

____

18.519.520.5

20.018.518.519.018.5

16.515.519.019.519.5

16.518.018.517.018.519.5

Min

14.514.015.515.0

__

___

13.514.014.5

15.015.013.513.516.0

15.013.514.015.514.5

15.013.013.515.514.015.5

AugustMax

17.518.517.016.517.0

17.016.516.017.518.5

18.518.517.518.517.5

16.017.517.516.517.0

17.015.015.016.516.0

16.515.519.018.018.018.0

Min

15.015.016.014.515.0

15.015.515.015.014.5

15.015.016.015.015.0

14.514.514.514.014.0

13.013.514.014.514.0

13.014.515.015.014.515.0

SeptemberMax

17.517.517.016.516.0

15.015.015.015.014.0

13.515.515.014.514.0

14.014.016.016.516.5

15.515.014.515.515.5

15.515.516.015.514.0

Min

15.014.013.514.514.5

13.012.011.011.011.5

11.512.512.014.011.5

12.013.513.513.013.0

13.514.514.013.012.5

12.512.513.513.012.5

71

TABLE 12.--Discharges and water temperatures at periodic-measurement sites

Quilceda Creek Basin

Date

1974 OcTT

Nov.Dec.

1975Jan.Feb.

Mar.Apr.May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.Nov.Dec.

1976Jan.

Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJuneJuly

Aug.

Sept.Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1977Jan.Feb.Mar.Apr.MayJuneJulyAug.Sept.

81665

7454978349

10562374

1117

7833732121335856346

4157441636

Site Drainage area = 15

Discharge

4.96 6.0812.2

63.518.2 63.317.818.917.49.01 6.275.884.46 6.05 6.2625.150.531.1

46.5 24.332.023.419.118.57.95 5.76 6.566.57 8.02 7.95

10.712.236.424.644.350.87.264.406.30

1

.4 mi 2Water tempera ture

8.9 9.68.2

5.24.7 5.66.99.5 12.0 14.8 13.5 12.7 9.012.15.63.5

6.0 6.1 9.511.010.412.8 13.5 11.010.6 8.4 5.8

3.85.47.07.3

10.411.611.414.612.6

Site Drainage area = 9.

Discharge (ft3/ s )

1.79 1.975.27

30.312.6 35.911.99.43

--4.27 --2.342.00

--2.29 1.919.9527.2

31.2 14.016.513.89.76

11.52.06 2.24 2.422.08 2.75 3.01

5.144.97

21.011.320.143.72.381.882.11

2

41 mi 2Water tempera ture

11.1 10.18.8

5.25.5 6.48.09.4 12.8 --15.613.5 13.8 10.011.96.1

--

6.0 6.64.210.012.211.012.8 13.0 12.010.5 8.0 6.2

4.26.27.28.410.613.611.815.013.8

Site Drainage area = 2.

Discharge (ft3/s)

0.65 1.181.21

5.63 1.876.302.902.43 1.46 --

.72

.65

.91

.731.886.36~

4.83 3.283.963.623.693.78.75

.85

.99.76

.79

1.20

1.271.354.062.894.165.89.62.72.87

3

88 mi 2Water tempera ture

9.4 9.08.0

4.6 3.25.28.4

10.2 12.5 --16.715.0--14.3--9.011.75.2

--

6.0 6.03.210.012.811.013.4--15.0--12.210.8 6.9 4.3

2.24.6 --10.013.211.617.414.6

Site Drainage area = 1,

Discharge (ft3/s)

0.75 --

1.65 1.49 1.30

--1.14

--.65

--.72

1.512.90

3.142.142.102.182.942.50

--.85

--.46.88

-_.73

.85

-- ---- --

4

.87 mi 2Water tempera ture

12.2

_- 10.3 -- 12.6--19.9--15.0--13.8_10.34.6

--

5.46.05.011.414.0__--20.0--15.0____12.2 6.8

__-- ---- --

72

TABLE 12. Discharges and water temperatures at periodic-measurement sites Con.

Mission Creek Basin

Date

1974 Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1975JanT

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

MayJune

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.Nov.

Dec.

1976JanTFeb.Mar.

Apr.MayJune

JulyAug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1977JanT

Feb.

Mar.Apr.

May

June

JulyAug.Sept.

172489

166756

7845459

107349

105623

18745

1112

73237323

12348956346

45

151674545126367

SiteDrainage area = 0.

Discharge(ft3/s)

0 0 --0

-- 0

0 e.Ol1.06

.14

.230 0 0 0 0 T.44

.13

.34 0.38.08.04

.05

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0T 0 T 000

5

33 mi 2Watertemperature

__ -- __

2.96.8 10.3 -- -- -- -- 10.65.4

4.06.4 8.916.715.0 -- -- -- --

-- --

Site 6Drainage area = 1.34 mi 2

Discharge(Ws)

__-- --1.07

.70

1.24.66

3.06 1.63.95.97

.74

--

.45--

.48

.97

.88 2.12

1.751.481.48 1.531.22

.98

.65

.76--

.77

.67

.74

.81

.57

.64

1.02--

.69--1.41

.87

.64

.60

.68

Watertemperature

__ _.9.0 7.7

4.34.5 4.5 11.914.015.2 19.4 --14.4 13.0 11.1 10.6 3.9

4.65.25.2

..11.013.4 11.815.0 14.5 14.512.2 _-8.05.0

3.0 5.67.2 11.4 10.2 12.515.018.6 13.3

Site 7Drainage area =1.33

Discharge(ft3/s)

__ -- 0.01

.34

1.67.54

1.68

--.48

1.12.57

.19

.07

--

.06

.05

.28 2.11

2.33.84

1.14

.94

.95

.74

.03--

.01

.06

.02--

.10

--

mi 2Watertemperature

__ ---- --8.8

--7.3

4.14.0

-- 3.6

--9.012.614.2 19.8 17.5 --15.7 11.5--10.2 4.1

5.05.03.8

__8.410.6 13.8 12.1-- 11.6 7.6

--

-- -- -- --

73


Mission Creek Basin Continued

Site 8 Drainage area = 0.74 mi 2

Date

1974 Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1975 Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

MayJune

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.Nov.

Dec.

1976Jan.Feb.Mar.

Apr.MayJune

JulyAug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

17 24 8 9

16 6 7 5 6

7845459

107349

105623

18745

1112

73237323

12348956346

Water Discharge tempera- (ft3/s) ture

(°C)

0

0

0

0

T

.07 1.30

.-.12

.16

T 00 0 00

--.72

~

.51

.26

.34

.31

.24

.03 00 00 0

__0

4.0 2.0

--4.2 6.0 8.811.4 -- -- --4.1

3.83.8 1.38.9

11.18.4 -- ---- _--

Site 9 Site 10 Drainage Drainage area = 1.57 mi 2 area = 0.08 mi 2

Discharge (ft3/s)

0.32

1.28

.62

.68

.68 2.24

--.55.60.50

.32

.22

--

.38

.39._

.38_-1.51

1.16.86.91

1.04.93.73

.34

.30.33

.33

.36

.35

Water Water tempera- Discharge tempera ture (ft^/s) ture (°C) (°C)

10.0 0.20 8.9

8.8

7.9

5.05.0 4.0

__10.012.212.6 16.7 14.5 __11.8

.15 12.49.9 10.4 4.2

5.05.04.6 8.210.8 __12.4 .08 15.4__12.1 011.7 11.1 7.55.5

Site Drainage arpa = fi.

Discharge (ftVs)

1.99 2.52

5.08

9.114.43 14.14.58 5.19 2.411.22 --1.00

--2.07 3.13_4.06_11.5

8.606.958.19 7.337.01 7.381.21 2.362.83

____1.02_1.98

11

5ft mi 2Water tempera ture (°C)

9.1 8.5

7.4

4.53.5

__ __9.4

__--__14.219.0 --15.7--14.2__11.0__10.4__2.6

4.04.23.4 12.8__ 16.4 16.513.3 _11.8_6.8

74


Mission Creek Basin Continued


Date

1977Jan.

Feb.

Mar.Apr.

May

June

JulyAug.Sept.

45

1516

74545126367

Discharge (ft3/s)

0 0 0

.07

.06

.14 000


Date

1974Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1975Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.Dec.

1724

896756

7845459

107

349

10567234

187

51112

Discharge (ft3/s)

__00 0 e.Ol

.02 3.20

11.0 3.88 1.26

.05 __ £.01T e.Ol <.01

T13.2~

8

74 mi 2Watertempera ture(°C)

7.3 8.6 13.6

13

12 mi2Watertempera ture

7.5

4.2 2.56.0 9.8 10.0

_

_5.6

Site 9Drainage area =1.57

Discharge (ft3/s)

.34.42

.53

.40

.89

.62.30.24

.34

Site 14Drainage area = 2.19

Discharge (ft3/s)

0

T

.01

.01--

.09 __4.02

14.8 4.19

.93

.39__

.12 e.02

.03

.05

.0518.9

mi 2Watertempera ture(°C)

2.46.8

__6.8 8.8

--9.0 10.613.616.4 11.4

Tulalip

mi 2Watertempera ture

9.4 9.18.0

4.6 _3.06.6 9.9

13.0

18.1_ 19.2 16.0 14.4_ _11.6

11.85.2

--

SiteDrainage area = Qr

Discharge (ft3/s)

__ __

10


____ __ ___

SiteDrainage

11

to mi 2

WaterDischarge tempera- (ft3/s) ture

_2.54

___ _ __ _

(°CJ

_3.0

_____ __ _____ _--

Creek Basin


Discharge (ft3/s)

___4.52 7.144.89

5.33__9.52

20.5_8.00

__5.80

4.69_ 4.68 3.75

____4.26

_4.46

4.23 20.0

15

74 mi 2Watertempera ture

__9.4 9.18.4

5.0_._3.27.2

_11.0_

13.9__14.7 15.0___10.9

9.6

10.2 3.9


Discharge

0_0_0

__

0

.01__

.031.98

_.21

_.25

0___00

__

0____

0

01.98

16

80 mi 2Watertempera ture

____________

5.0___2.06.2

8.0_

II____ ___________

II4.6

75


Tulalip Creek Basin Continued

Date

1976Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

MayJune

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.Nov.

Dec.

1977Jan.

Feb.Mar.Apr.

May

June

JulyAug.Sept.

7834237819323

1213345895346

45

1574545126367


Discharge (ftVs)

_9.366.26

_5.25

10.3e6.4

.06

.10__e.Ol

__.03

.02

.01T_0

0

.101.382.24___2.162.84

.02

.030

13


4.86.0 4.8 10.010.913.311.2_12.2 .-___10.6

__6.07.012.2 __13.416.1 12.418.2


Discharge (ft3/s)

9.988.94 6.72 14.0e5.21.16.19

__.04

.05 e.Ol

.01

.01 0

0

.01

.172.44

.64__3.20

.29

.17

.09

Tulalip Creek

SiteDrainage area = 1

Date

1974 Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

1975Jan

Feb.

Mar.

1724896756.

784545

Discharge (ft3/s)

_1.30_1.25 1.66

1.691.65 3.64

17

.50 mi 2watertempera ture (°C)

9.5 9.0 8.8

6.56.5 5.4


14

19 mi 2Watertempera turef°C)

--4.55.6 4.4

__10.810.316.013.8 15.6 15.0 11.4__

5.67.212.3 13.8 15.8 16.020.215.0


Discharge (ft3/s)

16.9 12.5--10.817.3

e!2.06.70 4.59

__4.45 4.22 3.814.523.80 5.37

3.964.154.53 6.03 8.038.55 4.173.76 4.00

15


--4.4 3.4 4.B

11.4--11.312.9 14.4 12.0

13.9 11.211.18.3 5.8

1.67.27.6 12.3 10.014.7 15.618.8 13.3

Site 16Drainage area = 0.80

Discharge (ft3/s)

1.69

.27

.28

.49

.170 0 0 0 00 0

0 000 0.11

000

mi 2Watertempera ture(°C)

5.0 3.0 3.09.4 12.2 -- ---- -- --

10.6 --

Basin Continued

18

.75 mi 2Water

Discharge tempera- (ft3/s) ture

(°C)

1.67 1.73 2.12

2.862.12 4.55

_. 10.0 9.5 7.9

5.55.4 4.8


19

.04 mi 2Water

Discharge tempera- (ft3/s) ture

(°C)

_-

0.13

.12

__--10.0

9.5 --

--

76

TABLE 12. Discharges and water temperatures at periodic-measurement sites--Con.

Tulalip Creek Basin--Continued


Date Water Discharge tempera- (ft3 /s) ture

(°C)


Discharge (fWs)



Water Discharge tempera- (ft3/s) ture

(°C)

1975 Conti nuedApr.

May

June

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.Dec.

1976Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

MayJune

July

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.Nov.

Dec.

1977Jan.

Feb.Mar.Apr.

May

June

JulyAug.Sept.

91078349

10567234

18785

1112

7834237

19323

1213345895346

45

1574545126367

--1.76

--1.55 1.381.18 -- 1.12 1.23 1.291.42 3.03

2.581.88 1.751.95

__2.27 1.80 1.50

-- 1.77 1.07 1.22

1.34 --

--8.3

--9.0 9.711.6 -- " 10.0--10.8-_ 8.59.4 5.1

__6.2

_- 5.29.8

_10.6 --9.8

-- 10.2-- 10.0 7.8

--

5.2

-_ -- --

--2.38 1.56

-_2.071.46

-- 2.03 --2.27 2.11 2.19 4.58

4.37 2.75 2.80 4.90

__2.652.79 2.19 --2.01 --2.282.13 2.192.23

2.022.172.78

--2.22

--3.88

__2.522.122.03 1.97

--7.0

--9.6 10.815.8 12.5 --12.6 9.9 10.0 4.6

5.8._6.0 5.4 9.6

_10.6 11.8----11.2 --11.010.6 7.95.8

__3.4.6.67.2

--8.0

--8.4 9.712.816.0

11.1

_. __ __ _. __._

.13 12.0

_ ._

__

.13 11.8 __

.10 11.9 __ __

___ __-_ ._ __ ____

e - estimatedT - less than 0.005 ft3/s

77

TABLE 13.--Chemical quality of surface water from selected sites

Date ofcollection

I/

Streamdischarge(ft3/s)

2/

Dissolvedcalcium(Ca)

Dissolvedmagnesium (Mg)

Dis- Dissolved solvedsodium potas-

(Na) si urn(K)

Milligrams

Bicar- Alkabonate Unity(HC03 ) as

CaC0 3

per liter

Dissolvedsul-fate(S04 )

Dissolvedchloride(CD

Dissolvedfluor-ide(F)

Totalnitrate

(N)

Totalnitrite

N)

Total Nitro-ammon- genia (N) total

organic(N)

Site 2. West Fork of Quilceda Creek near Marysville (USGS station 12157020)

11- 6-74 2- 4-75 9-18-75

l?-18-75 3- 4-76 6- 3-76 9- 9-76

2.0 13.2.IE

28. E 16.* 12.*2.4* 16. 7.2 8.1 2.6 78 64 14. 6.9

0.251.2 .20

1.21.1 .40 .23

0.01 .02 .01 .00 .01 .02 .01

0.03 .17 .06 .21 .26 .25 .06

0.25 .33 .14 .48 .39 .35 .18

Site 3. Quilceda Creek tributary near Marysville (USGS station 12157030)

9- 9-76 .99* 9.6 6.0 1.7 69 7.4 3.7 1.2 .02 .12 .39

Site 4. Sturgeon Creek at Marysville (USGS station 12157035)

9- 9-76

Site 6. Mission

11 -7-74?- 4-759-18-75

12-18-753- 4-766- 3-769- 9-763- 8-77

Site 7. Mission

11 -7-742- 4-759-18-75

12-18-753- 4-766- 3-76

Ross Lake

2- 4-75A?- 4-75C4- 9-75A4- 9-75D7-14-75A7-14-75E9-18-75A9-18-75F

Site 9. Mission

11- 7-742- 4-759-18-75

12-18-753- 4-766- 3-769- 9-763- 8-77

.88*

Creek

1.1.66.70E

2.0E1.5*

.98

.77

.80

Creek

.01

.54

.06E2.2E1.1*

.74*

.--_.---

Creek

1.3.68.38E

1.4E.91*.73*.33*.60

9.0 9.8 36. 2.9 68 56

near Marysville (USGS station 12157150)

.. -. --

tributary near Tulalip (USGS station 12157170)

..-_-- -_--

7.0 1.9 2.5 0.8 17 14--

14 12--

14 12._6.6 2.1 2.6 .5 16 13

--

tributary No. 2 near Tulalip (USGS station 12157210)

-_ _--_ --

58.

4.3

5.6

3.3

3.4

.04

.691.9

.322.02.1

.65

.381.3

.37 2.1

.22 1.5 1.4

.23

1.7 1.7 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.7

.87

.79 2.0.70

2.3 1.7

.73

.75 1.6

.01

.00

.01

.00

.00

.01

.13

.06

.04

.10

.05

.06

.22

.08

.07

.37

.22

.28

.26

.22

.24 1.1

.31

.33

.23

.46

.25

.46

.39

.57

.38

.32

.40

.33

.43

.20

.34

.19

78

Milligrams per

TotalKjel-dahlnitrogen(N)

0.28.50.20.69.65.60.24

Nitrogen,total

(N)

0.541.7

.411.91.81.0

.48

Totalphosphorus

(P)

0.07.06.09.08.08.13.08

Dissolvedortho-phosphorus

(P)

0.05.02.08.03.02.05.02

liters

Hardness(Ca,Mg)

--------.-70

Non-car-bonatehardness

----

6

Specificconductance(micro-

mhos)

142150161143147138184

PH(units)

7.37.17.27.1--

Water-temperature(°C)

10.15.5

11.93.53.0

11.810.7

Turbidity(JTU)

527364

Dissolvedoxygen(mg/L)

Totalcol i form(col. per100 ml)

!/

2202,300

900250930

4,4001,000

Fecalcol i form(col. per100 ml)

_. __130

.51 1.7 .06 .02 59 146 10.4 1,000 84

.50 .55 .12 .06 63 312 18.2 1,600 340

.28

.32

.36

.27

.301.3

.39

.40

.28

.51

.36

.51

.45

.67

-- -----."

.27

.42

.36

.36

.34

.28

.30

.50

.982.2

.692.32.42.0

.781.7

.662.6

.592.01.8

.91

..--..---- "

1.12.41.12.72.01.01.12.1

.02

.02

.04

.02

.02

.07

.05

.04

.01.01.04.01.01.03

.01.01.02.01.00.00.00.01

.02

.04

.03.01.02.02.03.02

.02

.02

.04

.02

.01

.02

.03

.02

.00

.00

.01

.01

.01

.01

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.01

.01

.02

.01

.01

.01

.02

.02

25

25

107105

99858478

10394

1158093575349

5755615660556054

112108107

806081

115100

..--7.37.17.06.8--

--6.97.27.06.1

6.96.96.87.08.06.26.66.2

--7.37.36.87.1 --

9.04.5

12.04.05.2

11.814.5

7.1

8.84.0

15.92.53.48.3

4.24.19.34.2

21.24.1

18.14.2

8.85.0 4.04.2 11.0

7.0

101006.-"

101002

_______._~~

111001 --

10.39.8

11.07.9

10.31.39.4

.1

69220

1,100780130

1,6001,500

100

31 97

TNTC 130 150

1,400

180170

1,8003883

110540230

120

<1

79

TABLE 13. Chemical quality of surface water from selected sites Continued

Milligrams per liter

Date of Stream collection discharge

I/ (ft3/s)y

Site 11.

11- 6-74 2- 4-75 9-18-75

12-18-75 3- 4-76 6- 3-76

Site 12.

11- 6-7412- 6-741- 8-752- 5-753- 5-754-10-755- 8-75 7-14-758- 7-759- 4-759-18-75

10- 8-7511- 6-7512-18-751- 8-762- 4-763- 4-764- 8-765- 4-766- 3-767-13-768 r -re - b- /b

9- 9-7610- 6-7611- 3-763- 8-77

Site 13.

2- 5-7512-18-753- 4-766- 3-763- 8-77

Mission

2. 4. 2.

11.a.7.

Mission

2.5.

13.4.

17.5.5. 2.

Z.1.3.7.8,

12,7.6.7.6.8,1,1,2,1,27,

Creek

,5 ,4 ,5E ,E ,2* ,4

Creek

.3

.36'.7G

, 3G.9 .06,91.06,8G.0

,26.6.0,76,8,7,8G,4G

.56

.6

.3G,7

Lake Shoecraft

312

5

1

.2

.E

.2*

.10*

.4

Dis- Dis solved solved cal - magnes- cium ium (Mg) (Ca)

near Mission Beach

--

--

near Tulalip (USGS

10.

5.2

_7.2

5.3

5.5 --5.4

--

_.

5.7

4.2 --

_6.3

4.2--

4.3 --5.4

.. -.--

Dis- Dis- Bi car- solved solved bonate sodium potas- (HC03>

(Na) si urn (K)

Alka Dis- Dis- Dis- linity solved solved solved as sul- chlor- fluor- CaCOs fate ide ide

(S04 ) (CD (F)

Total nitrate

(N)

Total nitrite

N)

Total ammon ia (N)

Nitro gen total organic

(N)

(USGS station 12157247)

--

-

0.01

.87

.02

.97

.83

.02

0.01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01

0.14 .07 .22 .11 .12 .13

0.29 .36 .50 .36 .34 .33

station 12157250)

5.9

4.6

_5.5

4.0

4.0 --4.0

_..- --

1.1 45_

.8 29.--

_.9 56

_

1.0 26_

1.0 29__

.5 37.

__.-

37 5.1 6.4_

24 7.8 6.1 0.0 __

__46 3.4 3.4-.

21 8.8 5.3 .1

24 7.2 4.3 .1__ 30 7.1 3.4 .1

__- ~

0.03__

.76.._

.19

_.02

.77_

.75_...04

_

.02 _

.44

0.01_

.01 _

.01

_

.01

.01_

.01_

...01

_

.01 _

.01

0.11_

.10__

.08

_.14

.09_

.11__

.15_

.15___

.17

0.49__

.40___

.36

__.31

_.

.37_

.27___

.39_

.50____

.38

Outlet near Tulalip (USGS station 12158001)

6.08.14.83.8

3.13.73.13.2

2.24.14.34.0

--

1.0 241.0 301.1 25

.9 24-

20 6.3 6.4 .025 5.0 5.2 .121 6.3 4.7 .120 6.3 5.2 .1--

.12

.10

.20

.13

.11

.00

.02

.00

.00

.00

.06

.03

.06

.05

.04

.29

.35

.24

.31

.38

Weal 1 up Lake

7-26-73A7-26-73B

Site 14.

3- 8-77

Site 15.

9- 9-763- 8-77

__

Tulalip

Tulalip

3,4,

Creek

.20

Creek

.8

.6

_

below

3.7

above

..8.1

_

Weal 1 up Lake

2.6

East Branch

7.3

_-

near Tulalip

4.0

near Tulalip

..5.8

__

(USGS station

1.0 20

(USGS station

.1.4 54

_

12158008)

16 4.9 5.4

12158010)

44 7.9 5.1

.02

.02

.07

.531.1

.00

.00

.00

.01

.01

.14

.18

.08

.05

.07

.37

.92

.39

.23

.34

80

Mill i grams

TotalKjel-dahlnitrogen(M)

0.43.43.72.47.46.46

Nitrogen,total

(N)

0.451.3

.751.41.3

.49

Totalphosphorus

(P)

0.02.02.04.02.02.03

per 1 iter


(P)

0.01.01.02.01.00.01

Hardness(Ca,Mg)

-- ----

Non-carbonatehardness

-- --


mhos)

no9597815578

pH(units)

--6.47.46.86.4

Water-temperature(°C)

8.53.5

13.82.02.0

11.0

Turbidity(JTU)

001001

Dissolvedoxygen(mg/L)

_-_ _.

Totalcol i form(col. per1DO mL)

I/

480360no

44170610

Fecalcoliform(col. per100 mL)

..__._--

.60 .64

.50 1.3

.44

.03 .02 48

.02 .01 30

.64 .03 .02

1

.45

.46

.38

.54

.65

.55

.35

.38

.30

.36

.42

.51

.1

.48

1.2

1.1

.59

.68

1.0

.47

.50

.50

.49

.53

.53 1.1

.04

.02

.02

.04

.06

.04

.01

.02

.01

.01

.01

.02

.06

.03

.01

.01

.02

.03

.03

.01

.00

.00

.00

.00

.01

.01

44

31

31

36

--

-

28 35 25 23

--

0

9

8

5

~:j

-

8 11

4 3

-

no 100-- --

95-- 85

_83-- 77-- 101-- 83

7282437072

7077

_- .--- .--- 7.2 7.3

_7.0 .-6.8-- ----_-"

7.07.26.8"

--

9.06.93.62.14.79.0

11.217.215.612.713.011.19.02.0

2.72.04.9

11.711.016.616.013.611.78.96.6

2.53.03.5

11.66.4

20.318.5

1-._.1-...1-.-...1....1

_.1_...1-...-..._.

0010-*

-.

9.4

11.1

5635

710170

319010

20080080

400145

1,0003480509690

140230

1,600100570300

1,03094

142025

220

3.6

.47 .54 .00 20 60 6.6 100 26

.82 1.5

.04

.04.03 .04 50

128118

11.2 6.6

34069

81

TABLE 13. Chemical quality of surface water from selected sites Continued

Milligrams

Date ofcollection

I/

Site 17.

11- 6-7412- 6-741- 8-75?.- 4-753- 5-754-10-755- 8-757-14-758- 7-759- 4-759-18-75

10- 8-7511- 6-7512-18-751- 8-76 2- 4-763- 4-764- 8-765- 4-766- 3-767-13-768- 5-76

Site 18.

9- 9-763- 8-77

Site 20.

11- 6-7412- 6-741- 8-752- 5-753- 5-754-10-755- 8-757-14-758- 7-759- 4-759-18-75

10- 8-7511- 6-75IP-18-751- 8-76 2- 4-763- 4-76 4- 8-765- 4-766- 3-767-13-768- 5-769- 9-76

10- 6-7611- 3-763- 8-77

Streamdischarge(ft3/s)y

East Branch of

1.21.71.71.63.61.81.61.2E1.11.2*1.3E1.31.4*2.9E2.6 2.0*1.8*2.0*?.3*1.81.51.8

East Branch of

2.3?.8

Tulalip Creek

6.113.17.14. G29.13. G10.6.4G4.96.76.6G6.7G

20.23. G25. 17.15. G 25.10.10. G6.3G6.26.3G6.27.1G

12.


Tulalip

-.---- -- --.--_.---

_ -- --

Tulalip

_7.2

Dissolvedmagnesium (Mg)

Creek near

.. -------- .---

_---- --

Creek near

_6.3

Dissolvedsodium(Na)

Tulalip

-- -- -- _.-.--

__---- --

Dis Bicar-solved bonatepotassium(K)

(HC03 )

AlkalinityasCaC03

per liter


Dissolvedchloride(CD

Dis- Total Total Total Nitro-solved nitrate nitrite ammon- genfluor- (N) N) ia (N) totalide organic(F) (N)

{USGS station 1215B03D)

.. ----_--- -- -- ------

_---- .-

mouth near Tulalip

..5.7

..1.5

.. -------- ---- ------

_.---

(USGS

_49

.. -- -- -- -- --

_.- _- --

station

_40

.._. -___--_---

_-- --

12158032)

5.6

_- -- .- -- .- _.-.--

_ --

4.7

0.98 0.00 0.04 0.14 __

1.2 .00 .04 .16 _. ._ .-

.92 .00 .05 .15 .-

1.2 .00 .04 .32

1.5 .00 .03 .22._._

1.1 .00 .03 .21

.60 .01 .03 .191.0 .01 .06 .28

at Tulalip (USGS station 12158040)

7.8-- 12. --9.2 -- 10. 5.8

6.5

_6.9 ---- 7.2

6.7-- 5.2

----5.8 -- 6.8 4.8

5.0

._5.6

-- -- 5.7

6.2-- 5.2 --5.4

---- 6.4 -.4.7

5.3

5.0

-- -- 5.9

1.8----1.0----1.3

------1.6 -_1.2

1.3

.7

-- -- -.1.5

58-- 41----50---- 62 --38--

40

_.49-- -- -_44

48-- 34 --41 --51 31--

33

_40 ---- ..36

4.8----10. --4.0 3.9 6.6

5.2

_6.7

---.---- 7.9

5.5 6.9 _-5.1 ---.5.2 5.5

4.0

__3.8

-- _5.7

.24 .01 .07 .22-- 0.0 .59 .01 .10 .33 ._

.24 .01 .09 .38 ..

.08 .01 .09 .25 .1 .58 .01 .07 .39

.1 .67 .01 .10 .33

_.1 .12 .01 .20 .39

.17 .01 .13 .43 _

.69 .01 .16 .41

^Letters following the date of collection of lake samples indicate the depths sampled: A = 3 ft, B = 11 ft, C = 50 ft, D = 52 ft, E = 60 ft, F = 64 ft.

2 E = estimated discharge; * = discharge measured on day before sample was collected; G = discharge from gaging station records.

3 TNTC = Too numerous to count.

82


TotalKjel-dahlnitrogen(N)

Nitrogen,total

(N)

Totalphosphorus

(P)


(P)

Hardness(Ca,Mg)

Non-carbonatehardness


mhos)

pH Water-turn' ts) temper

ature(°C)

Turbidity(JTU)

Dis-sol vedoxygen(mg/L)

Totalcol i form(col. perTOO ml)

3/

Fecalcol i form(col . per

TOO mL)

0.18 1.2 0.05 0.04

.20 1.4 .04 .04

.OS .05

.04 .03

.04 .01

.05 .04

101

_117 -- -- no_68

_98 101

_-- -- -- 7.3

_7.0

_7.2 --7.2

9.08 O

O

6.56.55.48.39.0

10.610.010.010.9

9.44.5

3.46.08.69.88.79.8

10.2

0

_.0-.-...-.-._.0

_.

0~

0..-.0-.-.

727

270370

2125

7100210

36300

18240987080

1201067

210100110

.22

.34.83 .07

1.3 .05.06.05 44

121109

11.0 6.8

510130

.29

.43

.47

.54 .04 .03 47

1.0 .05 .03 51

.72 .06 .04 47

.34

.46

.43

.59

.56

57

.43

1.0

1.1

.72

.74

1.3

.06

.04

.05

.07

.11

.08

.02

.03

.02

.05

.07

.06

47 51--_-47------53-- 34-- 37

_40 --

_41

0 --18--

6.-----

2--

3--

4

_0

_5

106----99

-- 104_--- 114----101----

79

_85 --121

100

9.57.04.23.04.09.9

13.516.014.011.1

7.3 14.011.38.4

7.0 2.05.02.8

7.1 1.6

11.46.9 12.0

12.015.011.8

7.26.2

1....1-...1_.....2-...1-...1

_.1_...-

_.-.

-- -- 9.7

10.6 10.8

4885

830320

754073

700500200760750

1,500150

3680

no60

410270220170

4,100600

1,400260

-- -- -- --

1,500381711

83

TABLE 14.--Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation

Material Thickness (feet)

Depth (feet)

29/4-1A1 Priest Point Water Co. Altitude 122 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller, 1941. Casing: 8-inch to 58 ft; 6-inch to 159 ft. Screen: 159-172 ft.

Soil 2 2Sand, dry 30 32Clay, blue - - - ... 10 42Hardpan 6 48Sand - ................... . 4 52Clay and hardpan-- 23 75Sand and gravel, dry 15 90Sand, tight 40 130Sand, fine, silty, some water 15 145Sand, clay, and wood 12 157Sand, coarse, water-bearing 6 163Clay 1 164 Sand, coarse, with 10 percent pea gravel and 5 percent

heavy gravel, water-bearing 8 172Sand, fine, and clay 2 174

29/4-1A2. Priest Point Water Co. Altitude 122 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1964. Casing: 8-inch to 141 ft. Screen: 141-146 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay -- 20 20Sand and clay 80 100Gravel and clay 24 124Sand, gravel, and clay, water-bearing 16 140Sand, coarse, water-bearing 6 146

29/4-1A3. Priest Point Water Co. Altitude 122 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1964. Casing: 8-inch to 141 ft. Screen: 141-146 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay 20 20 Sand and clay, tight 80 100 Clay and gravel, hard-packed 24 124 Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, with water

bearing streaks-- 16 140 Sand, coarse, clean, water-bearing 6 146

84

TABLE 14. Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation continued


Depth (feet)

29/4-1A4. Jack Denginen. Altitude 125 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann. Casing: 6-inch. Screened. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand and gravel 20 20Clay, blue 20 40Sand, dirty 60 100Sand and gravel, hard-packed, dirty 20 120Sand, dry 4 124Sand, water-bearing 22 146

29/4-1B1. Norman G. Kleisath, Altitude 95 ft. Drilled by Hi!ton Hayes, 1964. Casing: 6-inch to 100.5 ft. Screen: 100.5-105.5.

Unknown 60 60Hardpan at 60Unknown 25 85Hardpan 15 100Gravel and sand 5 105Unknown 105 105 i

29/4-1B2. Meridian Water Supply, Inc. Altitude108 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1965.Casing: 8-inch to 40 ft, 6-inch to 150 ft.Screen: 150-160 ft. Slot size: 0.035 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay 15 15Sand and gravel, water-bearing 10 25Sand, gravel, and clay, firm 5 30Sand, gravel, and clay, hard, dry 20 50Sand and clay, dry 25 75Sand, coarse, gravel, and clay, hard-packed 22 97Sand and clay firm 9 106Clay and sand, some water 14 120Sand, medium, water-bearing 7 127Sand and clay, hard-packed, little water 18 145Sand, coarse, and fine gravel, water-bearing 15 160

85

TABLE 14.--Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation continued


Depth (feet)

29/4-1B3. Chealco Community Association, Inc.Altitude 122 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller, July 1947.Casing: 6-inch. Screened

Sand and gravel 85 85Sand and gravel, dry, tight 40 125Sand, some water 17 142Sand, medium 18 160 Sand, coarse, with 10 percent fine gravel,water-bearing 10 170

Sand, tight 2 172

29/4-1B5. Little & Daniels. Altitude 102 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1963. Casing: 6-inch to 123 ft. Screen : 123-128 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Sand and gravel, loose 60 60Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, some water 15 75Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, dry 29 104Sand, water-bearing 24 128

29/4-1C1. Gays Water District. Altitude 125 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller, December 1958. Casing: 6-inch to 155 ft; perforated 155-165 ft.

Unknown Hardpan 70Sand and gravel, tight, dry 66 136Sand, medium, some water 10 146Sand, with 10 percent fine gravel, water-bearing 5 151Sand, coarse, with 10 percent fine gravel 13 164Clay, blue 1 165

29/4-1C2. Skokia Water Co. Altitude 125 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, June 1971. Casing: 6-inch to 150 ft. Screen: 150-160 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay 20 20 Sand and clay, dry 30 50 Sand, hard 25 75 Sand, gravel, and clay 25 100

(continued)

86


Material Thickness Depth __________________________________(feet) (feet)

29/4-1C2. continued

Sand and clay, dry 20 120Sand and clay, water-bearing 28 148Sand, coarse, water-bearing 12 160

29/4-1C3. H.C. Holscher. Altitude 102 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, June 1967. Casing: 6-inch to 130 ft; perforated 124-130 ft.

Sand and clay, with gravel streaks 98 98Sand, coarse, with some gravel, water-bearing 15 113Clay and sand 2 115Sand, coarse, with some gravel, water-bearing 15 130

29/4-1G4. Sam Wilson and Ralph Smith. Altitude 90 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, December 1963. Casing: 6- inch to 120 ft. Screen: 120-125 ft. Slot size: 0.040 in.

Soil, sandy 4 4Sand, fine 31 35Sand, fine, with clay streaks 10 45Sand and gravel, tight, cemented 50 95Sand, medium to coarse, loose, water-bearing 3 98Sand, fine, with silt 19 117Sand and gravel, loose, water-bearing 10 127

29/4-1G6. Ronninigen. Altitude 50 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, June 1971. Casing: 6-inch to 66 ft. Screen: 66-71 ft. Slot size: 0.017 in.

Sand and clay, firm 6 6Sand and clay, water-bearing 1 7Sand and clay, firm -- 3 10Sand, with some clay, wet 2 12Sand, gravel, and clay, firm, dry-- 18 30Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, dry 15 45Sand and gravel, water-bearing -- 5 50Sand, fine, with thin, clay streaks, water-bearing 17 67Sand, coarse, water-bearing -- 4 71

87



Depth (feet)

29/4-1G7. Robert C. Ackerman. Altitude 55 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, 1965 Casing: 6-inch.

Unknown 21i 2HSand and gravel, tight, dry 28i 50Sand, wet 25 75Sand, clean, and fine gravel 5 80

30/4-1Bl. Richard Huggins, Altitude 480 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co., Inc, May 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 193 ft. Screen: 193-198 ft. Slot size: 0.018

Topsoil 3 3Till, brown 96 99Till, sandy 69 168Till, blue 17 185Sand, fine 6 191Sand, coarse 7 198

30/4-1Cl. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 590 ft. Drilled by C.D. Marks, 1940. Casing: 6-inch Perforated: 23-28 ft and 35-39 ft.

Hardpan, gray 38 40Hardpan, blue, with boulders 68 108Unknown 17 125

30/4-1M1. Sam Lake Improvement, Inc. Altitude 545 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, 1965. Casing: 6-inch to 421 ft. Screen: 421-426 ft.

Soil, sandy 3 3Tin 44 47Gravel, tight, dry 13 60Gravel, coarse, loose, dry 42 102Sand, coarse, dry 18 120Sand, medium, dry 30 150Gravel and sand, coarse 30 180

(continued)

88


Material

30/4-1 Ml. continued

Sand, with silt, dry -Sand, with silt, wet -Clay, yellow, with sand and silt layers -Sand, fine to medium -Clay, blue, with silt layers Sand, crusty, with clay layers - Cl ay, bl ue -Clay, blue, with sand and silt layers -Hardpan - Unknown Sand -Clay, blue -Qanrl ^naveo anrl f ! no nvawol u/a^ov Koavi nn______

Thickness (feet)

. ____ QQ

. __ 25LmtJ

. __ 5w

. __ 5*J- - 21

. 14

. 74

. __ 3

. __ 50*J\J

. 1

. 4

. ?n

Depth (feet)

210 235 240 245 266 274 288 296 370 373 423 424 428 ASS

30/4-1N1. Lands and Water, Inc. Altitude 520 ft. Drilled by G.L. Calvin, February 1970. Casing: 8-inch to 247 ft. Screen: 247-257. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Gravel, dirty 10 10Gravel, compact, and boulders 10 20Clay, brown, and gravel 15 35Clay, blue, and gravel 37 72Sand 46 118Sand and gravel 38 156Sand 12 168Sand and silt 32 200Sand and gravel 18 218Sand and clay 4 222Sand and gravel, water-bearing 6 228Sand, and brown clay 3 231Sand, and blue clay 3 234Sand, clay, and silt, blue 9 243Sand and gravel, water-bearing 14 257

89



Depth (feet)

30/4-3A1. S.L. Meyer. Altitude 453 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1970. Casing: 6-inch to 163 ft. Screen: 163-168 ft. Slot size: 0.023 in.

Soil Clay, firm, with some gravel Hardpan Clay, firm, with some sand and gravel Sand, medium to fine, and clay, dry Sand, fine, and clay wet Sand, water-bearing

30/4-3A2. J.E. Johnson. Altitude 444 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1970. Casing: 6-inch to 163 ft. Screen: 163-168 ft, Slot size: 0.020 in.

Soil, clayey Hardpan Clay, hard-packed, with some sand and gravel Clay, with some sand, dry Sand, water-bearing

26

4245351424

1040256033

28

5095

130144168

105075

135168

30/4-3A3. Martin Andersen. Altitude 448 ft. Drilled by H. E. Deckmann, April 1970. Casing 6-inch to 146 ft. Screen: 146-151 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Clay and sand, firm Hardpan Clay, firm, with coarse sand and small gravel Clay and sand, dry Clay and sand, water-bearing streaks Sand, fairly clean, coarse

30/4-3A4. George Rolph. Altitude 425 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, February 1970. Casing: 6-inch to 131 ft. Screen: 131-136 ft, Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay, firm- Hardpan Clay, sand, and gravel hard

(continued)

152535521311

104020

154075

127140151

105070

90


Material Thickness Depth __________________________________(feet) (feet)

30/4-3A4. conti nued

Sand, with some clay, and gravel streaks, dry 40 110Sand, with some clay, wet 21 131Sand, medium, water-bearing 5 136

30/4-3A5. Bill Christian. Altitude 417 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co. Inc. April 1976. Casing: 6-inch to 127 ft. Screen: 127-132 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Loam 4 4Gravel 2 6day 8 14Till, gray 41 55Sand, fine 55 110Sand, coarse, water-bearing 22 132

30/4-3B1. Rowe. Altitude 407. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1968. Casing: 6-inch to 151 ft; perforated 118-135 ft. Screen: 151-156 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Hardpan 50 50Sand, gravel, and clay, firm, dry 60 110Sand, gravel, and clay, firm, wet 10 120Sand, water-bearing 36 156

30/4-3B3. O.D. Burright. Altitude 412 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, December 1968. Casing: 6-inch to 132 ft. Screen: 132-137 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay, sand, and gravel, hard 50 50Clay, sand, and gravel, softer 50 100Clay, sand, and gravel 10 110Sand, and clay, wet 15 125Sand, coarse, and clay, water-bearing 12 137

91



Depth (feet)

30/4-3B4. James Hoffman, Altitude 450 ft. Drilledby Hitt Well Drilling, May 1978. Casing: 6-inch to183 ft. Screen: 183-187 ft. Slot size: 0.010 in.

Topsoil ----- ---_ __-__ - 4 4Hardpan----- ---- - -- ---------- 66 70Gravel 13 83Sand and gravel, dry-------- - 5 88Clay, sandy ------ - ---- --- 17 105Hardpan------ - 27 132Sand, dry 34 166Clay, brown 16 182Sand, water-bearing -- - 5 187

30/4-3B5. Kiven Millar. Altitude 420 ft. Drilled by Countryman Well Drilling, April 1978. Casing: 6-inch to 128 ft. Screen: 128-135 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Hardpan, brown -- --- - 12 12Gravel, hard, brown, dry------ - - 18 30Gravel, dirty, packed, dry --- --- - 28 58Sand, fine, brown---- - - - ------ -- 30 88Sand, fine, and clay, yellow-brown ------------ 5 93Sand and clay--- -- ----------- 5 93Sand, fine, and some clay ------ ------ - 22 120Sand, fine-coarse, gray-- -- ------ 4 124Sand, coarse, and some gravel, some water- -------- 10 134Sand, water-bearing------ ---- -- ----- 1 135

30/4-3C1. Kathann Estates. Altitude 450 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, September 1969. Casing: 6-inch to 169 ft. Screen: 169-179 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in., 169-174 ft; 0.025 in., 174-179 ft.

Clay, sandy ------------------- ----- --- - 20 20Hardpan 30 50Clay, blue, with some sand and gravel ------- --- 25 75Clay and sand, yellow-brown, dry--- ------------ 55 130Clay, firm, with water-bearing streaks - 20 150Sand and gravel, with a little clay, water-bearing 4 154Sand, with some gravel, water-bearing ----- -- 25 179

92



Depth (feet)

30/4-3D1. J.F. Doleshel. Altitude 457 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co., October 1973. Casing: 6-inch to 165 ft. Screen: 165-170 ft. Slot size: 0.017 in.

Soil 2 2Clay 19 21Till, gray - - - -- 31 52Till, brown ----- 45 97Silt and clay - 7 104Silt, tan - - - 40 144Silt and clay, brown 5 149Sand, coarse, with some clay, water-bearing 21 170

30/4-3G1. Grubb. Altitude 402 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, September 1968. Casing: 6-inch to 123 ft. Screen: 123-128 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed - 50 50Sand and clay, firm, dry--- -- 55 105Clay and sand, with thin, water-bearing streaks- -- 14 119Sand, coarse, with some gravel, water-bearing 9 128

30/4-3H2. D.L. Larson. Altitude 395 ft. Drilledby H.E. Deckmann, January 1970. Casing: 6-inch to115 ft. Screen: 115-120 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay, firm--- -- -- 15 15Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed 35 50Clay and sand, firm 48 98Sand, with some clay, wet -- - -- 17 115Sand, medium, water-bearing -- 5 120

30/4-3H3. Doud. Altitude 390 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1966. Casing: 6-inch to 102 ft. Screen: 102-107 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Soil---------- -------------- ---- --- - ---- 3 3Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed 8 11Sand and gravel, with a little clay, dry 49 60Sand, fine, with a little clay - 30 90Sand and clay, with water-bearing streaks-- 10 100Sand and clay, water-bearing 7 107

93



Depth (feet)

30/4-3H4. Ravender. Altitude 400 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, March 1970. Casing: 6-inch to 138 ft. Screen: 138-143 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay, sandy -- Hardpan ----- .Sand and clay, with a few, thin, gravel streaks- Sand, water-bearing

10308023

1040

120143

30/4-3H5. Tucker. Altitude 390 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, September 1969. Casing: 6-inch to 96 ft. Screen: 96-101 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay, hard, and gravel--- --- Clay and sand, firm - Clay and sand, firm, with thin, water-bearingstreaks - --- -

Sand, medium, with streaks of fine sand, waterbearing ------- - - --

Sand, medium, with thin gravel streaks, waterbearing--------- -- ---- - -

104530

3

4

9

105585

88

92

101

30/4-6F1. D.P. Newland. Altitude 305 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, May 1976. Casing: 6-inch to 311 ft; open end.

Fill, gravel - --- - Gravel, coarse, loose------- Hardpan, with boulders ------Gravel, loose, dry Clay, brown, with thin sand layers- Hardpan----- --- --- ---- Clay, with thin sand layers --- Clay, blue- --- - -- Gravel, loose, dry --- --- Gravel, loose, water-bearing--

3115622522124178322

3147092144165189206289311

94


Material Thickness Depth ___________________________________(feet) (feet)

30/4-6L1. VI.L. Rape. Altitude 205 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1957. Casing: 6-inch to 226 ft. Screen: 226-231 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Gravel, hard 26 26Gravel, sand, and clay, soft, with some water 2 28Gravel, hard-packed with a little clay 2 30Clay, hard, with sand and gravel 10 40Sand, fine, and clay - - ---- 20 60Clay and sand, firm ----- --- 10 70Clay, hard, with sand and gravel -- 20 90Hardpan- 14 104Clay, blue-gray 66 170Sand and clay 40 210Sand, water-bearing - - -- 21 231

30/4-6P1. Sunny Shores. Altitude 85 ft. Drilledby H.E. Deckmann, May 1955. Casing: 6-inch to180 ft. Screen: 180-190 ft. Slot size: 0.010 in.

Sand and gravel, loose, dirty---------- -- -- 20 20Gravel and brown clay, hard------- - 40 60Clay, blue-gray 65 125Sand, fine, with some water--------- --- 1 126day 39 165Sand, fine, dirty, firm, water-bearing--------------- 18 183Sand, fine, loose, water-bearing--------- --------- 10 193Sand, finer, hard-packed------------- -------- 7 200

30/-6R2. Dorothy Cashen. Altitude 410 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling. Co., Inc., March 1975. Casing: 6-inch to 405 ft. Screen: 405-410 ft.

Gravel--------------------------------------- ----- 8 8Till, tan--------- - --------------------------- 23 31Till, brown 48 79Sand 64 143Silt 82 225Sand------------------------------------------------- 39 264day 11 275

(continued)

95



Depth (feet)

30/-6R2. continued

Silt ----- 21 296day--------------------- ----------- 39 335Silt- ----- 45 380Sand, fine 20 400Sand, coarse -- ----- ----- 10 410

30/4-7G1. Tulare Beach Association. Altitude 30 ft. Drilled by C.D. Marks and Son, December 1946. Casing pulled.

Sand, fine, with some clay 36 36Clay, blue 8 44Gravel and sand, water-bearing -- - -- ----- 23 67Silt and clay 24 91Clay, blue-------------- 30 121Clay, with some gravel--------------------------- 55 176Clay, sandy 34 210Sand, silty-------------------- 37 247Sand, blue, very fine, hard-- --- ------- 13 260Sand, blue, fine, water-bearing-- ---- ---- 61 321Clay, blue, hard ---------- 4 325

30/4-7G2. Tulare Beach Association. Altitude 30 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, July 1956. Casing: 8-inch to 55 ft. Screen: 55-60 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand, dirty ------ --------------- ----------- 50 50Clay, blue, and gravel, hard, wet------- ---- 4 54Sand, coarse, and gravel, water-bearing ------- 6 60Clay and gravel, dry------------------------------ 12 72Clay and fine sand 18 90

30/4-7H1. Tulare Beach Association. Altitude 450 ft. Drilled by C.D. Marks & Son, 1946. Casing pulled.

Soil------------------------------------------------- 2 2Till 83 85 Gravel----- -------------------------- --------- - 1 86Clay, yellow--------------------------- --- 7 93

(continued)

96



30/4-7H1.--continued

Sand, fine, with some clay 7 100Sand, with gravel streaks 35 135Sand, yellow 183 318Clay, yellow 28 346Sand, yellow, fine, dry 34 380Clay, yellow 3 383Clay, with fine sand 17 400Sand, fine, clayey-- 31 431

30/4-8A1. Port Susan Nature Trails. Altitude 410 ft. Drilled by Hayes Well Drilling & Pumps, Inc., June 1978. Casing: 6-inch to 385 ft. Screens: 385-395 ft. Slot size: 0.018 in., 385-388 ft; 0.025 in., 388-395 ft.

Clay, tan, and some gravel - 18 18Gravel, dry 102 120Sand, dry ---- - -- 45 165Sand and gravel, dry-- - .. 45 210Sand, dry----- -- - - - - - 81 291Clay, gray 1 292Sand, fine, "dirty," gray 14 306Clay, gray--- -- 45 351Clay, sandy, gray -- 34 385Sand, coarse, and some gravel, water-bearing- 10 395Sand, fine, and some clay -- 4 399

30/4-8P1. Bodeen and Lohr. Altitude 140 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1967. Casings: 6-inch to 297 ft; perforated 297-302 ft. Screen (inside casing): 297-302 ft. Slot size: 0.014 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay 9 9Sand, medium, and clay -- 21 30Sand, fine, and clay, dry -- 70 100Unknown, water-bearing seams 90 190Clay and sand, with streaks of heavy, blue clay----- 74 264Sand, fine and clay, water-bearing 16 280Sand and clay, firm, with very little water 17 297Sand, medium, with thin, clay streaks, water-bearing 5 302Sand, fine, and clay -- 28 330

97



30/4-8Q1. Unknown. Altitude 140 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1953. Casing: 6-inch to 138 ft. Screen: 138-143 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand, silt, and clay 55 55Sand, silt, and clay, wet -- 35 90Sand and gravel, hard-packed 22 112Sand and gravel, some water 1 113Unknown, hard-packed- 10 123Sand, silt and clay, with some water 15 138Sand, water-bearing- 5 143

30/4-10F1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 235 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, 1974. Casing: 8-inch to 98 ft.

Soil 4 4Clay and gravel 16 20Clay, brown, and gravel ---- 11 31Clay, sandy-- 3 34Sand, fine, and clay 11 45Sand, brown, fine to medium 5 50Sand, brown, medium - 15 65Sand, medium to coarse--- 2 67Clay, brown ---- 3 70Clay, blue 1 71Sand, coarse - -- 1 72Clay, brown -- -- -- 1 73Sand, fine to medium -- -------- 13 86Clay, gray 12 98

30/4-10G1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 230 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, 1974. Casing pulled.

Clay, sandy----- -- - 5 5Sand and gravel ---- ------ 15 20Clay, brown, and sand -- - 10 30Sand, fine, and some silt-- -- 15 45Sand, fine to medium - - 9 54Clay, gray 9 63Clay, sand, and wood - - 1 64Sand, medium, artesian flow 11 75Clay, brown, silty 50 125Clay, brown, some gravel 45 170

98



30/4-10L1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 224 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, 1974. Casing: 8-inch to 65 ft. Screen: 60-65 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay and gravel --- 14 14Clay and sand----- - - 19 33Sand, fine-medium, some water -- 9 42Sand, coarse, and fine gravel, some water-- 15 57Clay, silty, and gray sand-- - 2 59Sand, gray, and blue clay, artesian flow 7 66Clay, brown, and wood ---- 2 68Clay, gray 12 80

30/4-10L2. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 230 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, 1974. Casing: 8-inch to 84 ft. Screen: 84-94 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay, brown, and gravel-- -- - 28 28Clay and sand 19 47Sand, medium - 12 59Sand and gravel -- -- -- -- -- 9 68Sand and gravel, medium-coarse ------- 22 90Clay, brown ---------- -------- _. - 5 95

30/4-10L3. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 215 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, 1974. Casing: 8- inch to 80 ft. Screen: 80-95 ft. Slot size: 0.040 in.

Sand and gravel --- -- -- ---- 25 25Sand, silty, and clay ----- 20 45Sand, brown ---- ------ 3 43Sand, medium to coarse--- ---- --- 6 54Sand, coarse 11 65Sand, medium----- -- ---- -- 6 71Sand, coarse - -- ------ - - -- 4 75Sand, medium to coarse -- - ------ ----- 7 82Sand, fine to medium --- -- ------ ------ 3 85Sand, medium to coarse - ----- - 13 98Sand, fine to medium ----- --- - 18 116Sand, fine to medium, and some gravel-- - 1 117Clay, brown 1 118

99



Depth (feet)

30/4-10L4. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 190 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, 1974. Casing: 8-inch to 88 ft. Screen: 88-95 ft. Slot size: 0.050 in., 88-90 ft; 0.060 in., 90-95 ft.

Sand and gravel ---- -- - Sand, silty, and clay----- .--.Sand, brown ------- -- .

coarse, and gravel-- -- fine to medium ------- .fine, artesian flow---- --- medium to coarse, artesian flow-

Sand Sand Sand Sand Clay

305

121717681

3035476481879596

30/4-10L5. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 199 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, September 1974. Casing: 8-inch to 86 ft. Screen: 86-101 ft. Slot size: 0.040 in.

Clay and gravel, with some sand- ---- - Clay, blue, sand and gravel---- ----- -, Sand and gravel --- ---- --- -- Unknown-- ------ --------------- ..,Sand and gravel - --- --- ------- -.Sand and gravel, fine to medium, water-bearing Clay - - - - ------

20877

1248

1

2028354254

102103

30/4-17B2. Ochs Brothers. Altitude 135 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, February 1968. Casing: 6-inch to 127 ft. Screen: 127-142 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in, 127-132 ft; 0.020 in, 132-137 ft; 0.010 in, 137-142 ft.

Sand, gravel, and clay-------- -------- ---- 50Sand, gravel, and clay, with water-bearing streaks 10Sand, gravel, and clay, firm, dry-- ---- --- -- 20Sand and clay-- --- --- --------------- 45Sand, medium, and clay, water-bearing---- ----- 10Sand, fine, and clay, water-bearing --- ------- 7

506080125135142

100



Depth (feet)

30/4-17B3. Donald Senter. Altitude 125 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, June 1960. Casing: 6-inch to 123 ft. Screen: 123-128 ft. Slot size: 0.014 in.

Sand and clay 115 115Sand, with clay streaks, water-bearing 8 123Sand, medium, water-bearing 5 128

30/4-17B4. Ernie Santi. Altitude 120 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1955. Casing: 6-inch to 114 ft; perforated 70-73 ft. Screen: 114-119 ft. Slot size: 0.040 in.

Sand and clay 64 64 Sand, coarse, loose 1 65 Sand and gravel, hard-packed 20 85 Sand and gravel, loose, with some silt and clay, water-bearing 34 119

30/4-17B5. A.W. Nylander. Altitude 110 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, May 1949. Casing: 6-inch to 100 ft; Screen: 100-105 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand and clay 12 12Hardpan 4 16 Sand, gravel and clay, with thin water-bearingstreaks 14 30

Sand, hard, dry 50 80Sand, water-bearing 25 105Sand, with clay, hard 7 112

30/4-17B6. C. Fairchild. Altitude 110 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, July 1953. Casing: 6-inch to 90 ft. Screen 90-95 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Sand and gravel, loose 8 8Unknown 16 24Gravel and clay, cemented 16 40Sand and silt, dry 35 75Sand, water-bearing 20 95

101

TABLE 14.--DriTiers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation continued


Sand, gravel, and clay, firm Sand, gravel, and clay, with thin water-bearingstreaks

Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, little water- Sand and gravel, water-bearing Sand, fine, and clay

20

7010

375

Depth (feet)

30/4-17B9. Clyde Lashua. Altitude 90 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, February 1969. Casing: 6-inch to 178 ft; perforated 89-90, 100-103 ft.

20

90100103178

30/4-17B11. Waldo Wickstrom. Altitude 112 ft, Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1960. Casing: 6-inch to 49 ft. Screen: 48-54 ft, Slot size: 0.010 in.

Clay, sand, and gravel, hard-packed- Clay, sand, and gravel, soft Sand and clay, wet Sand, water-bearing Sand, fine, clay and gravel

101523

34

1025485155

30/4-17B12. Leonard Hansen. Altitude 100 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, February 1968. Casing: 6-inch to 143 ft; perforated 125-135 ft.

SandSandSandSandSandSandSandSand, gravelUnknown

gravel, and clay fine, and clay, water-bearing gravel, and clay, dry

and clayand clayand clayand clayand clay

gravel gravel gravel gravel

water-bearing dry water-bearing thin water-bearing streaks water-bearing

441125

710

42410

8

4455808797

101125135143

102



Depth (feet)

30/4-17B13. Fahlstrom. Altitude 105 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, July 1965. Casing: 6-inch to 181 ft. Screen: 181-186 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Soil, sandy-- --- --- ---- 6 6Clay, sand, and gravel --- --- -- ---- 52 58Clay, and water-bearing sand and gravel streaks------ 10 68Sand, coarse, and clay, water-bearing 5 73Clay, sandy, and gravel, hard, dry 39 112Clay, sand, and some gravel, dry --- 23 135Sand and clay, wet--- -- --- -- 45 180Sand, medium to coarse, and clay, water-bearing-- 6 186

30/4-17B14. Veenhuizen. Altitude 115 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1962. Casing: 6-inch to 105 ft. Screen 105-110 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Gravel, sand, and clay-- 30 30Sand, fine, and clay, soft---- --- 25 55Clay, gray, with some gravel - -- 15 70Clay, brown sand, and gravel--- 15 85Clay, brown, with water-bearing sand streaks 15 100Sand, water-bearing ---- ----- 10 110

30/4-17B15. Dishnow. Altitude 90 ft. Drilled by H.E, Deckmann, September 1965. Casing: 6-inch to 146 ft. Screen: 146-151 ft. Slot size: 0.010 in.

Sand and gravel 28 28Sand and gravel, some water 2 30Sand and clay - - -- 8 38Sand and clay, some water -- 2 40Sand, fine, and clay-- ------ 49 89Sand, fine, water-bearing - 3 92Sand, fine, and clay---- - -- 54 146Sand, fine, water-bearing ------- - 5 151

103



30/4-17B16. Garvey. Altitude 95 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann. Casing: 6-inch to 115 ft. Screen: 115-120 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand, silt and some gravel, hard-packed 89 89 Unknown, water-bearing 31 120

30/4-17B17. Anderson. Altitude 80 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, July 1954. Casing: 6-inch to 122 ft. Screen: 122-127 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Gravel, coarse sand, and clay, hard 70 70Sand, dirty, wet 20 90Sand, coarse, with gravel streaks, water-bearing 20 110Sand with gravel streaks, loose, water-bearing 17 127

30/4-17C1. Spee-Bi-Dah Community Water Co. Altitude 110 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller, 1946. Casing: 6-inch to 372 ft; perforated 366-372 ft.

Sand and gravel, dry 102 102Sand, fine, with some clay 2 104Gravel, fine 2 106Clay, yellow, sandy 3 109Sand, silty, some water 5 114Clay, gray 5 119Clay, blue 13 132Clay, sandy 17 149Sand, gray, some water 4 153Clay, gray 6 159Sand, dark gray, fine, water-bearing 101 260Sand, hard 9 269Sand, fine 21 290Sand, hard, some water 4 294Sand, fine to medium 4 298Clay and fine sand 7 305Sand, fine 9 314Sand, fine, with clay layers 29 343Sand, partially consolidated 1 344Sand, medium, with 15 percent fine gravel 9 353Sand, medium 5 358Sand, partially consolidated 4 362Sand, coarse, with fine gravel 5 367Gravel, coarse, and coarse sand 5 372Unknown 5 377

104



Depth (feet)

30/4-17J1. David Miller. Altitude 270 ft. Drilled by Hayes Well Drilling, April 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 220 ft. Screens: 220-223 ft and 225-228 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in, 220-223 ft, 0.018 in, 225-228 ft.

Topsoil, gravelly ----- 3 3Gravel, with some brown clay 29 32Clay, brown, and gravel 78 110Gravel and sand -- 85 195Clay, brown - 6 201Sand, fine, brown, water-bearing 29 230Clay, gray at 230

30/4-17J2. Don Pardee. Altitude 270 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co., November 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 202 ft. Screen: 202-207 ft. Slot size: 0.012 in.

Topsoil - -- 1 1Till, brown ----- -- - 107 108Sand, fine, and till - 94 202Sand, fine, water-bearing ----- 5 207

30/4-17K1. Tulalip Shores, Inc. Altitude 190 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller, December 1946. Casing: 8-inch to 303 ft, 6-inch to 507 ft; perforated 497-504 ft.

Soil, sand, and gravel -- 10 10Hardpan- -- -- 5 15Sand, dry----- - ---- -- 50 65Sand and gravel - --- 20 85Sand, tight 42 127Sand, fine, some water-- --- 5 132Sand, yellow and gray, tight 9 141Clay, sandy- --- --- - - 9 150Sand, gray, fine - --- -- -- -- 5 155Clay, sandy --------- - 2 157Clay, blue -- - - - 47 204Sand, black, with fine gravel, some water- - 2 206Sand, gray, with some clay 3 209

(continued)

105


Material

30/4-1 7K1 . continued

Sand, fine and fine gravel, water-bearing Sand, with some clay Sand, fine, and wood Sand, soft, clayey Sand, fine, with some water Sand, gray Sand, fine, silty Sand, tight, with clay layers Sand, fine, tight Sand, tight, with clay layers Sand, fine

Sand, gray, coarse, with 25 percent fine gravel,uia^fky* hoa vi nn___

Sand, coarse, and gravel llnknnwn .

Thickness (feet)

Q

25w5>x

7020L.\J

43" wCO

20QOou

71

176

TO

Depth (feet)

218 220 225 230 300 320 363 425 445 475 482 483

500 506 sift

30/4-21G1. Arcadia Water District. Altitude 175 ft. Drilled by Williams Well Drilling, Inc., October 1969. Casing: 6-inch to 365 ft. Screen: 365-375 ft. Slot size: 0.012 in.

Sand and gravel 93 93Clay 90 183Sand and silt 170 353Sand, water-bearing 22 375

30/4-21J1. Upper Tulalip Heights. Altitude 160 ft. Drilled by Williams Well Drilling, 1971. Casing: 6-inch to 365 ft. Screen: 365-380 ft. Slot size: 0.012 in, 365-375 ft; 0.010 in, 375-380 ft.

Soil, gravelly 7 7Gravel and clay, compact 53 60Clay, blue, and sand 60 120Sand and silt 235 355Sand, fine 5 360Sand, water-bearing 20 380

106

TABLE 14. Drillers 1 logs of selected wells in the Tirtalip Indian Reservation continued


Depth (feet)

30/4-21J2. Whyte. Altitude 182 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, September 1967. Casing: 6-inch to 231 ft. Screen: 231-241 ft. Slot size:0.014 in. 231-236 ft; 0.012 in., 236-241 ft.

Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed 120 120Clay, with some gravel, hard 10 130Clay, gravel, and sand 5 135Sand and clay 25 160Clay, blue-gray 20 180 Clay and gravel, hard, with thin water-bearingstreaks 8 188

Clay 7 195Clay, with thin water-bearing steaks 17 212Sand, water-bearing 4 216Sand, silt, and wood chips, water-bearing 4 220Sand, fine, and clay, soft 8 228Sand, fine, with some clay, water-bearing 13 241

30/4-21Q1. Edmund H. Lindstrom. Altitude 20 ft. Dug by owner, August 1944. Casing: 48-inch to 20 ft. Open end.

Clay, gray-blue 19 19 Sand, coarse 1 20

30/4-22L1. Paul Hesby. Altitude 100 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, May 1974. Casing: 6-inch to 106 ft; open end.

Soil, sandy 3 3Gravel, coarse, cemented 87 90Gravel, coarse, loosely cemented 12 102Clay, blue 3 105Sand and gravel, loose, water-bearing 2 107

30/4-23H1. Marvin Turk. Altitude 195 ft. Dug by A1 Torie Well Digging, February 1974. Casing: 36- inch to 23 ft; perforated 21 -23 ft.

Soil 2 2Sand 8 10Gravel and clay, compact 11 21Hardpan 2i

107


Material Thickness Depth _________________________________ (feet) (feet)

30/4-23Q1. Ed Sebers. Altitude 220 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co., Inc., May 1977. Casing: 6- inch to 70 ft. Screen: 70-75 ft. Slot size: 0.018 in.

_ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ A A "" -p. -p. -p. -p. p p -p, -p, -p, -p, -p, -p. _ _ uf »f

Till nv»a\/ _ _ __ ___ __ - __ _______ __ .47 51i I I I , y i Q jr " " " " " " " " " " " «t / ^ i

oanQ - " ii> " > " " > " > " « « « « « « « « « «P> «P> «P> « «P> «P> «. «. «. «. «. «. «. «. «. «. «. «. « 1 1 Q£Sand, medium-coarse 13 75

30/4-25K1. Marysville Test Hole No. 4. Altitude 180 ft. Drilled by Northwest Pump and Drilling Co., February 1969. Casing: 12-inch to 344 ft.

- - _________ ___ ___________ _________ A. A.mm mmmmmm ip.fi -f

Sand, brown, with silt and coarse gravel 20 241 1 1 1 , or own ~~ " " > > > > > > > > « « «.« - «.> -.-.-» -.-.-. -.-. -.-.-.-. j £_iSilt, blue, with sand and gravel, and layers of

Silt, brown, with thin lenses of water-bearingsand and gravel and some organic matter 15 91

Silt, blue, with thin lenses of water-bearing sandand gravel, and some organic matter 29 120

Sand, blue, fine, and silt 25 145 Clay, blue 40 185 Sand, blue, fine, and silt, water-bearing 103 288 Clay, blue, with compacted layers 55 343 Sand, fine, and silt, water-bearing 1 344

30/4-26G1. Bert Wooding. Altitude 92 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co., Inc., November 1978. Casing: 6-inch to 140 ft. Open end.

Topsoil 6 6Till __ . ____ __ _ ____ ______________________ ftft QAI I I I m~ m~ -m w~ w~ w~ mm w~ mm w~ w~ w~ w~ -» - m* w~ mm mm w~ - mm mm mm mm -m -m m*, m*, m*, mm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ULJ JT

CJT* ____ on 1 9AOIIU"*^^^^^ OW I Lm^

Sand 12 136______ A. 1 AH" i "TV/

108

TABLE 14.--Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tula'1 ip Indian Reservation continued


Depth (feet)

30/4-26N1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 140 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller. Casing pulled.

Clay, yellow, soft--------------------------Clay, blue- -- --- Clay, sandy ------- ---- ----Clay, blue, tight Sand, tight ---- Sand, loose, wet- -- --- ----,Sand, gray, tight, dry Clay, blue-- -- - -- - Clay, sandy, and peat, in alternating layers

152025507348

34

153560

110117120124132166

30/4-28A1. Hermosa Point Dock and Water Association Altitude 60 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, 1966- Casing: 6-inch to 159 ft. Screen: 159-163.

Hardpan ----- -- -- -- Clay, silt, and wood-- -- ----- Sand, fine ---- ---- - --- -Sand, medium to coarse, and gravel --- -

559738

55152155163

30/4-35R1. Potlatch Beach Water District. Altitude 128 ft. Drilled by C.E. Miller, September 1945. Casing: 6-inch to 155 ft. Screen 155-171 ft. Slot size: 0.070 in.

Hardpan ---- - ---- -- -- -----.Sand and gravel, tight- ----- -- -. .Clay, sand, and gravel, tight --- --- Sand and gravel, dry-- - ---- Sand, some water---------- ------- -- -__-_.Sand, medium, water-bearing-- -- ------ .Clay and fine sand ------ -------

402020601517

406080

140155172

109

TABLE 14. Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation--continued


Depth (feet)

30/4-35R2. Clayton 01 son, Altitude 117 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, October 1963. Casing: 6-inch to 156 ft. Screen: 156-161 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Soil 3 3Sand and gravel, cemented 29 32Sand, tight, dry 15 47Silt, with clay streaks 13 60Sand and gravel, tight, dry 74 134Sand, brown, medium, and loose, wet 8 142Sand, brown, medium, with clay streaks 5 147Sand, gray, fine to mdedium 10 157Sand, fine, water-bearing 10 167

30/4-36F5. F. Witchey. Altitude 220 ft. Dug, 1944. Open hole.

Hardpan and clay 34 34

30/4-36F12. Monte Murphy. Altitude 220 ft. Drilled by Ralph Medlen Well Drilling, November 1975. Casing: 6-inch to 136 ft. Screen: 136-139 ft. Slot size: 0.012 in.

Soil 1 lClay, sandy 14 15Sand, coarse, some water 2 17Clay, sandy, blue 11 28Clay, blue, with some gravel 13 41Clay, red, sand, and gravel, water-bearing 1 42Sand, with red and gray clay 81 123Sand and gravel 4 127Sand, fine-coarse, and gravel, water-bearing 11 138Unknown 1 139

30/4-36J11. Priest Point Grocery. Altitude 135 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1949. Casing: 4-inch to 157 ft. Screen: 157-162 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Sand, gravel, and clay, hard 30 30Sand, fine, and silt 40 70Sand and fine gravel, hard-packed 20 90Sand 50 140

(continued)

110



30/4-36J11. continued

Sand, wet 13 153 Sand, coarse, with some gravel, silt, and fine

sand, water-bearing - ------- --- 10 163

30/4-36J12. Robert E. Cress. Altitude 140 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, July 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 173 ft. Screen: 173-178 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Soil, sandy ---- - - 3 3Hardpan, gravelly ------ -- - 20 23Sand and gravel, loose, dry ......... .._._ ng 142Clay, silty, blue---- 24 166Sand, medium, loose, wet --------- . .- 12 178

30/4-36J13. Con Brade. Altitude 140 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, May 1978 Casing: 6-inch to 151 ft. Screen: 151-156 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Soil ------------- 3 3Hardpan 27 30Sand and gravel, loose, dry -------------- .-- 105 135Sand and gravel, silty, loose, wet ---------- 21 156Clay, silty, loose, wet 40 196

30/4-36K1. L. James. Altitude 155 ft. Drilled byH.E. Deckmann, February 1967. Casing: 6-inch to160 ft. Screen: 160-165 ft. Slot size: 0.014 in.

Clay, sand, and gravel, solid - ----- - 14 14Sand and gravel, some clay- ---- ----------- 21 35Sand, some clay ------ -- --- -- ---- 55 90Sand and gravel, some clay------------------------ 30 120Sand and gravel, some clay, with water-bearingstreaks 23 143

Sand, fine, water-bearing ------ ------- -..- 22 165

111



30/4-36N1. Egon Bauer. Altitude 105 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, October 1973. Casing: 6-inch to 130 ft. Screen: 130-135 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Soil, brown, sandy --- ----------------------- 2 2Sand, with clay layers, brown------------ ------- 20 22Gravel, coarse, tightly cemented, brown 7 29Sand, loosely cemented, brown, dry----- ---- 76 105Sand, fine, brown, wet --- ---- ------ 17 122Sand, medium, brown-------- ----------------------- 13 135

30/4-36N3. Delbert Morden. Altitude 95 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, October 1974. Casing: 6-inch to 120 ft. Screen: 120-125 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Soil, sandy--------- ------------------------- 3 3Clay, blue - - - 23 26Sand and gravel, cemented, dry------------------ 69 95Sand, loose, water-bearing--------------------- --- 30 125

30/4-36N4. Morris Brown. Altitude 98 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, October 1976. Casing: 6-inch to 120 ft. Screen: 120-125 ft.

Soil, sandy------------------------------------------ 2 2Clay, sandy----------- - --- - -- ---------------- 28 30Sand, with clay layers- ---------------------------- 5 35Sand and gravel, dry ------------ ------------- 62 97Sand, fine-medium, loose, water-bearing------- - -- - - 28 125

30/4-36P4. W. Crawford, Altitude 118 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, February 1953. Casing: 6-inch to 141 ft. Screen: 141-146 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Sand and silt------------ - ---------------- 118 118Sand, wet--------------------- - -- - ------ 13 131Sand, water-bearing-- - ---------------------- 15 146

112

TABLE 14.--DriHers 1 logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation continued


Depth (feet)

30/4-36P6. Grant E. Hall. Altitude 125 ft. Drilledby Hitt Well Drilling, May 1972. Casing: 6-inchto 143 ft. Screen 143-148 ft. Slot size: 0.010 in.

- 114 114Silt 3 117day 6 123Sand . - --- 13 135Sand and gravel--- --- -- -- ---- 4 140Sand, water-bearing 8 148

30/4-36P12. Johnason. Altitude 135 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, November 1948. Casing: 6-inch to 167 ft. Screen: 167-172 ft.

Hardpan, with sand and gravel streaks - ---- 50 50Sand, silt, and clay-- ----- 10 60Gravel, hard-packed, and some hardpan 10 70Sand, silt, and clay 65 135Sand, fine 30 165Clay, blue 1 166Sand, blue, water-bearing - -- - 6 172 Clay, with some fine sand ----------------------------

30/4-36P13. W. Perkins. Altitude 126 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, September 1976. Casing: 6-inch to 148 ft. Screen: 148-153 ft. Slot size: 0.035 in.

Soil, sandy-- -------------------- - -- 5 5Hardpan, gravelly, coarse, brown-- --------- is 23Boulder----- ---- ----- ----- --- --- -- 2 25Hardpan, gravelly, coarse, brown---- -------------- 7 32Gravel, dry-------- ---- --------- .-_ 93 125Sand and gravel, medium, loose, water-bearing--- 28 153

113



Depth (feet)

30/4-36Q4. Larry Knowles. Altitude 130 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, July 1975. Casing: 6-inch to 153 ft. Screen: 153-158 ft. Slot size: 0.040 in.

Soil, sandy-- ---- 5 5Clay, blue - - - - - 35 40Clay and boulders 39 79Sand, some gravel, cemented, dry---- -- 63 142Clay, with thin sand layers, wet ---- 9 151 Sand, medium, with thin clay layers, loose,water-bearing - - -- 7 158

30/4-36R1. Snug Harbor Mobile Home Park. Altitude 135 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, February 1970. Casing: 10-inch to 138 ft. Screen: 138-154 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in., 138-148 ft; 0.012 in., 148-154 ft.

Soil, sandy ---- ---- --- ------Clay, blue ----- -- - ..... -- 30Sand and clay, with gravel streaks, firm -- 56 86 Sand, coarse, and gravel, some clay, hard-packed,

dry 29 115 Sand, and clay, some gravel, dry-- 11 126 Sand, and some gravel, water-bearing----- ------ 28 154

30/4-36R2. Snug Harbor Mobile Home Park. Altitude135 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, May 1967.Casing: 10-inch to 138 ft. Screen: 138-155 ft.

Clay, blue 30 30Clay, blue, with some sand 56 86Clay and gravel, hard packed----- - - ---- 29 115Sand and clay, dry 21 136Sand, water-bearing --- -------- -- - ---- 19 155

114



30/4-36R3. Chuck Korff. Altitude 125 ft. Drilled by J & S Drilling Co., Inc., March 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 135 ft. Screen: 135-140 ft. Slot size: 0.016 in.

Soil 7 7Till, brown 82 89Sand 22 111Till, blue 24 135Sand and gravel 5 140

30/5-5C2. Hugo Johnson. Altitude 89 ft. Dug by A.W. Johnson, August 1960. Casing: 42-inch to 29 ft; perforated 10-12| ft, and 24-29 ft.

Soil 6 6Gravel 8 14Sand 15 29

30/5-5E2. J.T. More. Altitude 93 ft. Dug by G. Torie, September 1951. Casing: 36-inch to 27 ft; perforated 22-27 ft.

Soil 3 3Sand, gray, dry 5 8Sand, gray, water-bearing 19 27

30/5-6B1. W. Hilde. Altitude 208 ft. Dug by owner, April 1974. Casing 42-inch; open end.

Hardpan, very hard 10 10 Gravel, some sand 6 16

30/5-6B3. Carol Smith. Altitude 205 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, June 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 80 ft.; open end.

Soil, sandy 3 3Hardpan, gravelly 22 25Clay, blue, with thin sand layers 9 34Sand and gravel, loose, dry 25 59Gravel, loose, water-bearing 21 80

115



Depth (feet)

30/5-6B4. Richard L. Lilienthal. Altitude 208 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, May 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 97 ft.; open end.

Soil, sandy- ------- ------------ 3 3Hardpan, coarse-------------------------------------- 32 35Gravel, loose, dry-------------------------------- 8 43Sand, with thin clay layers, dry--------------------- 3 46Sand, loose, dry-------- ----------------- ----- 3 49Gravel, loose, dry-- ----------- ---------------- 28 77Gravel, loose, water-bearing 20 97

30/5-6B5. Paul Needham. Altitude 140 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, December 1978. Casing: 6-inch to 76 ft. Open end.

Soil, sandy----------------------------------------- 3 3Sand, fine, brown--------- ----------------------- 5 8Hardpan, gravelly-- 52 60Sand and gravel, silty, wet --------------------- 12 72Sand and gravel, coarse, loose, wet-------------- 4 76

30/5-6H2. Jerry Carter. Altitude 96 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, August 1974. Casing: 6-inch to 109 ft; open end.

Soil, sandy-------------------------------------- 2 2Sand, brown, cemented ---------------------------- 6 8Sand and gravel, loose, some water, high in iron 6 14Clay and cemented gravel- ------------------------ 16 30Sand and gravel, gray, cemented------- -------- 34 64Clay, silty 14 78Clay, blue, and boulders---------------------------- 3 81Gravel, gray, coarse, cemented-- -------------- 7 88Clay, blue------------------------------------------ 3 91Gravel, cemented----------- ---------------------- 7 98Sand and gravel, loose -- 10 108Gravel, coarse, loose -- 1 109

116



Depth (feet)

30/5-6H3. K. Alexander. Altitude 96 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, August 1969. Casing: 6-inch to 131 ft; perforated 115-128 ft, plugged 129-131 ft.

Soil, brown, sandy --- -- ---------- 2 2Sand and gravel, brown cemented 23 25Sand and silt, gray ------ --- -- 35 60Clay, blue 7 67Sand and gravel, gray, cemented, wet ----- ----- 44 mSand and gravel, gray, artesian flow------ ------- 20 131

30/5-6J4. G. Gesme. Altitude 95 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, 1966. Casing: 6-inch to 107 ft; open end.

3 3Sand, gray, wet--- ---------- --- 47 50Silt and fine sand, gray---------- ------------ 27 77Clay, blue 20 97Sand and gravel, loose-------------------------- -- 8 105Gravel, artesian flow --- 2 107

30/5-6K1. William Schmidt. Altitude 192 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, March 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 49 ft; open end.

Soil, sandy 2 2Boulder, granite------------------ ------------- 2 4Hardpan, with coarse gravel------------------ ----- 33 37Gravel, sand, and silt 10 47Gravel, coarse, loose, water-bearing - ---------- 2 49

30/5-6Q1. Paul Watson. Altitude 215 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1969. Casing: 6-inch to 107 ft. Screen: 107-112 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

Sand and clay, firm------- ------------------- -- 47 47Sand, clay, and gravel, hard------------------- -- 13 60Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, with thin water-bearing streaks---- ------------------ -- 27 87

Clay, gray, firm------------------------------------- 18 105Sand and gravel, water-bearing-- ------- --- 7 112

117



Depth (feet)

30/5-6Q2. Jean Raymond. Altitude 225 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, April 1971. Casing: 6-inch to 100 ft. Screen: 100-105 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in

Sand and clay, firm 48 48Clay and sand, hard-packed, dry 12 60Clay, sand, and fine gravel, hard-packed 30 90Clay, gray-- 10 100Sand, with some clay, water-bearing----- 5 105

30/5-7F1. A.D. Neal. Altitude 275 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, 1970. Casing: 6-inch to 175 ft. Screen 175-180 ft. Slot size: 0.040 in.

Soil - - - 3 3Clay, with some silt- 12 151111 25 40Sand and gravel, dry 98 138Clay, blue 3 141Clay, with sand layers, wet-- ---- -- 29 170Sand and gravel, loose, water-bearing 10 180

30/5-7F2. Ralph Peterson. Altitude 270 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, October 1966. Casing: 6-inch to 174 ft. Screen: 174-179 ft. Slot size: 0.020 in.

4 4Clay, solid - - 8 12Clay, sand, and gravel -- ------ - -- 26 38Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed, dry 52 90Sand, some gravel and clay, soft 40 130Clay and sand 17 147 Clay, firm, with streaks of water-bearing sand

and gravel---- --- --- --- 6 153Clay, with water-bearing gravel streaks 4 157Clay and sand 10 167Clay, with water-bearing streaks 3 170Sand, with a little gravel, water-bearing 9 179

118

TABLE 14. --Drillers' logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation continued

Material Thickness Depth ___________________________________ (feet) (feet)

30/5-7G5. Norman Des Rosiers. Altitude 240 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, March 1975. Casing: 6-inch to 130 ft. Screen: 130-1 35ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

canHv -..--..-._.-.. ,. _..___.. «... _. ^ ^O U 1 1 \4 jr - - - * - » ^1 ^

Clay, brown, with sand streaks 11 14Gravel, brown, coarse, and cemented 89 103Gravel, gray, coarse, cemented, with some water 25 128Gravel, loose, with sand streaks, water-bearing 7 135

30/5-7G6. Goen. Altitude 150 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, December 1977. Casing: 6-inch to 70 ft. Open end.

Sand and gravel, coarse, loose 4 4Hardpan, gravelly, coarse 16 20Gravel, coarse, loose, dry 14 34Clay, with peat layers, dark brown 5 39Sand, with thin clay layers 5 44Gravel, coarse, loose 3 47Sand, with clay layers 4 51Sand and gravel, very fine to coarse, wet 16 67Gravel, coarse, loose, wet 3 70

30/5-7G7. Don Bates. Altitude 255 ft. Drilled by Ace Drilling and Pump Service, December 1977 Casing: 6-inch to 147 ft. Open end.

Hardpan, gravelly 72 74Gravel, loose, dry 60 134n av hi no. __ f\ TAfiujr , u i uc _______ ______ y I *^\j

Gravel, coarse, wet 7 147

30/5-7G8. Denny Morgan. Altitude 240 ft. Drilled by Hayes Well Drilling, August 1978. Casing: 6-inch to 102 ft. Open end.

.... .... -. 99-«-- -» -- « « « « - _.».-....-_..._.«».. ^ ^

Gravel, brown, and cobbles 28 30

Gravel and clay, brown 64 99 Gravel , water-bearing at 99llnlf nnuin _ ..... _» _. «... .................. «... ....u i ii\ i lu wi i

119



Depth (feet)

30/5-7R1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 75 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, Inc., June 1976. Casing: 6-inch to 137 ft. Open end.

Sand, silt, and clay, with some gravel Sand, fine, water-bearing - Sand, silt, and clay, gray -- Clay, blue-gray -- Clay, hard, gray ---- - Sand and clay--- - -- Clay, with sand streaks, gray Clay, blue-gray- -- ---

30/5-18Q1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 80 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, Inc, June 1976. Casing: 6-inch to 88.2 ft. Open end.

Topsoil-- ------- --- ---- - Sand and gravel, with silt and clay, brown- Sand and gravel, water-bearing - Sand, fine- -- -- - ----- Silt and sand- - --- -- Sand and clay------------------------- -Clay, gray, with sand streaks-- ---- --

2539

18*5

lh 5% 8

47

21754

372022

256478*297104^ 110 118 165

21924286585107

30/5-19M1. Marysville Test Hole No. 1. Altitude 510 ft. Drilled by Northwest Pump and Drilling Co., May 1968. Casing pulled.

Sand and gravel, silty, brown --- Sand, gravel, and boulders, brown, cemented- Sand and gravel, silty, blue-gray - Sand, silty, blue-gray-- ----- --- --Sand, brown, cemented - - --- - Sand and gravel, brown, cemented- ------Sand, brown, cemented - ----------- -Sand, brown, fine, with silt streaks, water bearing-- ---- -- ----------------

Sand and gravel, brown, cemented Sand, fine to coarse, water-bearing -- Sand, brown, cemented ---- --Sand, brown, fine, water-bearing- ---

(continued)

3244122671137

23423

1712

3276890157168205

228270273290302

120

TABLE 14. Drillers 1 logs of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation continued


Depth (feet)

30/5-19M1. continued

Clay, greenish-gray 15 317 Sand and gravel, silty, greenish-gray, with

lenses of water-bearing sand 35 352Silt, blue-gray, with lenses of water-bearing sand 38 390Clay, blue, with lenses of water-bearing sand 60 450Sand, fine to medium, water-bearing 14 464Sand, silty, water-bearing 18 482

30/5-20B1. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 45 ft. Drilled November 1943. Casing: 6-inch to 40 ft. Screened,

Sand, brown Clay, sandy, and hardpan Sand, water-bearing Clay, sandy

7101310

7173040

30/5-20G4. Arnold McKay. Altitude 44 ft. Drilled by Dahlman Pump and Drilling, Inc., December 1975. Casing: 6-inch to 51 ft. Screen: 51-61 ft. Slot size: 0.010 in., 51-56 ft; 0.008 in., 56-61 ft,

Soil Sand, fine, brown Sand, gray, some water Sand, fine, and silt, gray, some water- Sand, fine, and clay day - -

21216324890

2143062

110200

30/5-20K2. Tulalip Tribe. Altitude 38 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 31 feet; open end.

Loam, sandy Sand day - - - -Sand

215

311

2172031

121



Depth (feet)

30/5-20Q2. R. Burri. Altitude 33 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 26 feet; open end.

Loam, sandy -- --- ---- --------- ------ 2 2Sand-------------- - -------------------------- 24 26

30/5-29B3. Robert Moses. Altitude 26 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 24 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy -------------------------------------- 2 2Sand--------------------------------------------- 16 18Unknown------------- ------------------------------ 6 24

30/5-29B5. A. Hatch. Altitude 25 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 26 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy ----------------------------- ------- 2 2Sand 24 26

30/5-29B9. Viola Topash. Altitude 28 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to

ft; open end.

Loam, sandy------------------------------------------ 2 2Sand -- - ---- -- - 26*2 28^

30/5-29B10. Arnold Cheer. Altitude 31 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 19 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy --------------------------------------- 2 2Sand------------------------------------------ 15 17day 2 19

122


Material Thickness (ft)

Depth (ft)

30/5-29C2. Donald T. Sherlock. Altitude 28 ft. Dug by A.W. Johnson, April 1962. Casing: 36-inch to 40 ft; perforated 35-40 ft.

Sand 40 40

30/5-29C6. H. Turner. Altitude 29 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 28i ft; open end

Loam, sandy 2 2 Sand 261 28i

30/5-29F3. George G. Gregg. Altitude 21 ft. Dug by Pearson Well Drilling, July 1974. Casing: 42-inch to 21 ft; perforated.

Sand, brown, fine 20£ 20i Unknown £ 21

30/5-29G2. Maria Moses. Altitude 20 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 33 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy 2 2 Sand 31 33

30/5-29G3. Maria Moses. Altitude 21 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 33 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy 2 2 Sand 31 33

30/5-29G4. Lawrence Charley. Altitude 21 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 28 i ft; open end.

Loam, sandy Sand

123



Depth (feet)

30/5-29G6. Lucille Hatch. Altitude 21 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 21 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy - - 2 2Sand - - - - 9 11Clay 2 13Sand - - - 6 19Clay 2 21

30/5-29J2. Alfred Sam. Altitude 19 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 19 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy 2 2Sand 13 15day -- - ---------- 2 17Sand - - - -- 2 19

30/5-29K1. Richard Spencer. Altitude 17 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 28% ft; open end.

Loam, sandy ----- ------ _..-. 2 2Sand---------------- 26% 28%

30/5-30B1. Pete Dillon. Altitude 145 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., July 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 33 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy-- -- - 2 2Gravel 30 32Hardpan --- --- -- _-_-_-_ i 33

30/5-30B2. Nora Dillon. Altitude 140 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., August 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 24 ft; open end.

Gravel 6 6Clay---- 1 7Gravel 12 19Sand 5 24

124



Depth (feet)

30/5-30B4. Dallas Taylor. Altitude 115 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., August 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 19 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy----- -- -- -- 2 2Gravel 17 19

30/5-30B5. Tom Reeves. Altitude 155 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., August 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 14 ft; open end.

Gravel - ----- 2 2 Sand--- -------- ----- --. -_-- 3 5Gravel 5 10 day----- --- - ----------- ------ 4 14

30/5-30G1. R. Kona. Altitude 112 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., July 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 17 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy 2 2Gravel--- - 12 14Hardpan ----- - -------- ------- ._ 3 17

30/5-30G2. Louise Ledford. Altitude 160 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., August 1963. Casing: 42- inch to 66*5 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy ----- - --- -- - ------- 3 3Hardpan------ - -- -------- -- 31 34Sand and gravel- ------- -- ................ 5 39Hardpan and cobbles ---- --------- ---- -- 14 53Gravel 13% 66%

30/5-30G3. Bernice Parks. Altitude 160 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., July 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 64ft; open end.

Gravel 1 1Hardpan 45 46Gravel 18 64

125



Depth (feet)

30/5-31A1. S. Philipp. Altitude 12 ft. Dug 1927. Casing: 42-inch

Clay and hardpan ._ _ - - 23 23 Sand 3 26

30/5-31B4. Fred Saunders. Altitude 55 ft. Dug by G. Torie, 1943. Casing: 36-inch to 54 ft; open end.

47^Sand 6% 54

30/5-31B5. Fred Saunders. Altitude 55 ft. Dug 1953. Casing: 36-inch to 56 ft; open end.

Till -.- 49^ 4%Sand &t 56

30/5-31B6. E.M. Johnson. Altitude 30 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckman, August 1957. Filled in.

Unknown 25 25 Clay and sand, with some water----------------- 17 42Clay, hard, and gravel------------------------------- 10 52Clay, with water-bearing gravel streaks--------- 3 55Sand and gravel, coarse, with some clay, water bearing------------------ ---------- ---- 2 57

30/5-31B7. W.C. Morgan. Altitude 19 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, August 1957. Casing: 6-inch to 57 ft. Screen: 57-60 ft. Slot size: 0.025 in.

Hardpan---------------- - ----------- ---------- 18 18Clay and sand, firm--- ----- ._- - - - 22 40Clay and sand, some water - 8 48Sand, gravel, and clay, hard-packed------ ------ 7 55Sand, water-bearing----- ------------------ --_-- 5 60

126



Depth (feet)

30/5-31B8. Edwin M. Johnson. Altitude 30 ft Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, March 1958. Casing: 6-inch to 52% ft. Screen 52%-55 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Clay, hard ---- Hardpan-------- -- --Clay, hard Clay and sand, firm Clay and sand, some water- Sand, water-bearing --

8125

10155

82025355055

30/5-31E1. Stan Jones, Sr. Altitude 130 ft. Drilled by H.E. Deckmann, May 1967. Casing: 6-inch to 131 ft. Screen: 131-136 ft, Slot size: 0.020 in.

Clay and gravel, hard - Sand, coarse, and clay, hard Clay, sand, and gravel, some water- Sand, gravel, and clay, dry-- -- Sand and some gravel, water-bearing-

2030105026

205060110136

30/5-31F1. D.Jones. Altitude 80 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, February 1964. Casing: 6-inch to 85 ft; perforated 78-83 ft; plugged 83-85 ft.

Sand, loose, dry ---------Sand, with clay layers, dry- Sand and gravel, cemented--- Sand and gravel, dry--- Sand and medium gravel Sand and coarse gravel- -

1435

438

12

141722657385

30/5-31F2. Hill. Altitude 85 ft. Drilled by R.E. Freeman, February 1964. Casing: 6-inch to 87 ft. Screen: 87-92 ft. Slot size: 0.030 in.

Gravel, coarse, cemented _--__-___-- _.___. Sand and gravel, tight -- ---- -- Boulder -- -- --- ----- ..--_-.Sand, medium, tight, dry----- - ------Sand, with 5 percent fine gravel, water-bearing-

145129

16

1465677692

127



Depth (feet)

30/5-31F3. G.E. Carpenter. Altitude 110 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., July 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 97 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy ------ _-__. _-__-__-__ 4 4Hardpan 48 52Sand and gravel -------------- --_ -_- __-._ 45 97

30/5-31F5. D. Jones. Altitude 80 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., June 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 21 ft.

Loam, sandy -- ------- --- ------- --_ i iHardpan------- ---- ------ --- -- 13 14Gravel, water-bearing- - -------- ---- 7 21

30/5-31G2. Glen Parks. Altitude 38 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., June 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 38 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy---- ----------- - -_-.._ . i iHardpan----- ----- ----- __._- -- 37 33

30/5-31G3. Wesley Patrick. Altitude 57 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., June 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 31 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy --- --- ---- ------ i lClay, gray 12 13Hardpan - ----- - - -- - 18 31

30/5-31G5. Lena Cladoosby. Altitude 17 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., June 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 21 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy ----- ------ --_- ---- - 1 1Hardpan----- ------------------ - - 15 15Gravel------------- 4 20Hardpan-- --- ---- - - -------- l 21

128



Depth (feet)

30/5-31M1. E. Price. Altitude 120 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., June 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 17 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy --- ---- - --------------- i iSand and gravel-------------------------- 2 3Clay 2 5Sand----- ----------------------------- -- 3 8Clay 6 14Hardpan ------------------------ ____-__-__._--- 3 17

30/5-31M4. Madeline James. Altitude 130 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., May 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 21 ft; open end.

Loam, sandy--- -------- ___-_.__.___._-___.__-_ i iSand- -- - - - n 12Hardpan 9 21

30/5-31M6. Ray Price. Altitude 122 ft. Dug by Ward Sharp, Inc., June 1963. Casing: 42-inch to 19 ft.

Gravel --------------------------------------- -- 4 4Sand-------------------------------------------- - 13 17

2 19

129

TABLE 15.--Records of selected wells in the Tulalip Indian Reservation

EXPLANATION

Local well number; Numbered by township, range, section, and 40-acre subdivision, as described on page vi.

Owner; Name of owner or tenant.

Water use; H, domestic supply; I, irrigation; P, public supply, U, unused; Z, well destroyed.

Altitude of land surface (ft); Altitude of land-surface datum, in feet, with reference to mean sea level (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929).

Well depth (ft); As measured, in feet below land-surface datum, by Geological Survey personnel or other agencies or as reported by well drillers or owners.

Casing diameter (in.); At point, or interval, where well is finished.

Well finish; F, perforated and gravel-packed; 0, open end; P, perforated; S, screen; T, sand point; W, walled; X, open hole; Z, brick-lined.

Water level (ft); Water level of well, in feet above or below land-surface datum as measured by Geological Survey personnel or other agencies or as reported by well drillers as owners; F, flows, with head unknown; +12, flows, head 12 ft.

Specific capacity (gpm/ft): The yield of the well, in gallons per minute, divided by the drawdown of the water level, in feet. Data usually from short-term (1-4 hour) bailer test by driller at time well was constructed.

Aquifer; Water-bearing unit(s) tapped by well. See figures 12-18.

Log available; G, driller's geologic log in table 14.

Data reliability; C, well location checked in the field; U, well location not checked.

130

TABL

E 15. R

eco

rds

of

sele

cte

d w

ells

in

th

e T

ula

lip

India

n

Rese

rvatio

n C

ontin

ued

CO

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

29/4

-1A

1-1

A2

-1A

3-1

A4

-1B1

-1B

2-1

B3

-1B

5-1

B6

-1C

1

-1C

2-1

C3

-1D

1-1

D2

-1D

3

-1D

4-1

D5

-1G

1-1

G2

-1G

3

-1G

4-1

G5

-1G

6-1

G7

30/4

-1B

1-1

C1

-1M

1-1

M2

-IN

I

-2H

1-3

A1-3

A2

-3A

3-3

A4

-3A

5-3

B1-3

B2

-3B

3-3

B4

-3B

5-3

C1

-3D

1-3

G1

-3H

1-3

H2

Ow

ner

Prie

st

Po

int

Wat

er C

o. do

do

Jack

D

engi

nen

Nor

man

G

. K

leis

ath

Meridia

n

Wat

er

Sup

ply,

In

c.C

heal

co

Com

mun

ity A

sso

cia

tion

, In

c.Little

& D

an

iels

Che

alco

C

omm

unity

A

sso

cia

tion

, In

c.G

ays

Wat

er D

istr

ict

Sko

kia

Wat

er

Co.

H.

C.

Hol

sche

rE.

W

. G

edde

sF

ost

er

Sta

nton

A.

M.

Van

ders

tay

Jam

es

Nowa

kM

. Br

own

Dr.

L.

B.

M

arqu

iss

Ear

l E

dgar

J.

E.

Wee

ks

Sam

Wils

on

and

Ral

ph

Sm

ithR

alph

S

mith

Ron

nini

gen

Rob

ert

C.

Ack

erm

an

Ric

hard

M

uggi

nsT

ula

lip T

rib

eSa

m La

ke

Impr

ovem

ent,

Inc.

Agne

s S

mith

Land

s an

d W

ater

, In

c.

John

H

elle

rS.

L.

M

eyer

J.

E.

John

son

Ma

rtin

A

nder

sen

Geo

rge

Rol

ph

Bill

Christ

ian

Rowe

0.

D.

Bu

rrig

ht

Jam

es

Hof

fman

Kiv

en

Mi lia

rK

atha

nn

Est

ate

sJ.

F.

D

oles

hel

Gru

bbD.

F

alk

ne

rD.

L.

La

rson

Wat

er

use U P P H H P P H U P P H H H H H H H H H H U H H H U P H P H H H H H H H H H H H P H H H H

Altitude

of

lan

d

surf

ace

(f

t) 122

122

122

125 95 108

122

102

122

125

125

102 855 5 20 10 60 85 85 90 90 50 55

480

590

545

542

520

550

453

444

448

425

417

407

415

412

450

420

450

457

402

394

395

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 172

146

146

146

106

160

172

128

196

165

160

130

120 4 6 25 __ 11 132

130

125 32 71 80 198

125

426

234

257

285

168

168

151

136

132

156

137

187

135

179

170

128

105

120

Cas

ing

diam

e

ter

(in.) 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 6 6 6 6 96 72 42 42 54 6 6 6 32 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 6

Wel

l finis

h

S S S S S S S S S P S P -- 0 0 0 0 W S z S ~ S P S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S

Wat

er

level

(ft)

121.

0012

1.33

117.

7312

4.00

94.3

2

105.

00

116.

5011

9.17

120.

00__

85.0

02.

002.

00

_ __ 7.12 86.6

728

.70

45.0

049

.00

174. 6.2

033

6.70

214.

0019

9.50

232.

7013

5.00

133.

0012

7.50

110.

00

104.

0010

6.92

115.

8611

0.00

160.

00

113.

0013

7.00

141.

6710

1.00

80.3

098

.00

Dat

e w

ate

r le

vel

mea

sure

d

4-

-41

4-19

-67

4-19

-67

2-

-65

4-19

-67

4-

5-65

10

-21-

7510

-21-

75

6-

1-71

4-

19-4

710

- 7-

7410

- 7-

74

_ __11

- 6-

74

12-2

4-63

3-19

-75

6-10

-71

1965

5-11

-77

2-15

-77

10-2

7-77

9-

-77

11-1

4-74

8-31

-76

8-17

-70

9-1

0-70

4-1

7-7

02-

12-7

0

4-14

-76

10-

2-74

10-1

8-74

1-11

-69

5-31

-78

4-26

-78

9-26

-69

10-2

8-73

9-26

-68

12-1

2-74

1 -3

1 -7

0

Spaci

fic

capaci

ty

(gp

m/f

t)

8r\

.U

10.0

9.1

10.0

~ _ __ __ _ __ 10.0

13.0

9.5

__ 8.0 8.0

20.0

1.5 .5

__ 8.0

10.0

2.5

_ 8.6

_ 10

.0

Aq

uife

r

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 4 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Logs

a

vail

- able G G G G G G G G G __ _ __ G G G G G G G ._ G G G G G G _ G G G G G G __ G

Dat

a re

lia

b

ility

C C C U C C C U C C C C C C C U U C C C C C C U C C C C C C C C C U C C C C U U C C U C C

TABL

E 15.-

-Reco

rds

of

sele

cte

d w

ells

in

th

e T

ula

li'p

India

n

Rese

rvatio

n C

ontin

ued

CO

IN

3

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

30/4

-3H

3-3

H4

-3H

5-5

N1

-5N

2

-en

-6L1

-6P1

-6Q

1-6

Q2

-6R1

-6R

2-7

G1

"7 P

O-/

be

"7^O

-/G

o

7 U

1 -/ H

I

-7K

1

/ 1\ i

-8A

1on

O

L 1

-8D

1

-8P1

-8Q

1-1

0F1

-10G

1-1

0L1

-10L

2-1

0L3

-10L

4-1

0L5

-140

1

-17B

1-1

7B2

-17B

3-1

7B4

-17B

5

-17B

6-1

7B7

-17B

8-1

7B9

-17B

10

-17B

11-1

7B12

-17B

13-1

7B14

-17B

15

Ow

ner

Dou

dR

aven

der

Tuc

ker

Adam

s-- D.

P.

Ne

w! a

ndW

. L.

Pa

peS

unny

S

hore

sG

. G

reye

rbie

hl

P.

Win

ters

L.

E.

Bat

hD

orot

hy

Cas

hen

Tula

re

Beac

h A

ssoci

atio

n-d

o

__

d

o

do--

-do

--

- -

Po

rt

Susa

n N

atur

e T

rails

doD.

C.

D

abbs

Bode

en

and

Lohr

Unk

now

nT

ula

llp

Trib

e d

o

d

o

d

o

d

o

d

o

d

o

R.

H.

Gu

ert

in

J.

Koo

nsO

chs

Bro

the

rsD

onal

d S

ente

rE

rnie

S

anti

A.

W.

Nyl

ande

r

C.

Fa

irch

ildS

pee-

Bi-D

ah

8L.

G

. G

reye

rbie

hl

Cly

de

Lash

uaB

ell

Wal

do

Wic

kstr

omLe

onar

d H

anso

nF

ahls

trom

Vee

nhui

zen

Dis

h no

w

Wat

er

use H U H H H H H P H H H H Z P P Z P P P U H H U Z U P P P P H H H H H H H P H H H H H H H H

Altitude

of

land

surf

ace

(f

t) 390

400

390

415

420

305

205 85 411

400

425

410 30 30 30 450 30 410

395

395

140

140

235

230

224

230

215

190

199

210 70 135

125

120

no no 65 50 90 40 112

100

105

115 90

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 107

143

101

350

-- 311

231

190

405

437 7

410 60 45 Cf)

0£

399

399 23 302

143 98 170 65 94 95 96 101 4 45 142

128

119

105 95 44 18 178 54 143

186

no 151

Cas

ing

diam

e

ter

(in.) 6 6 6 6 42 6 6 6 6 6 42 6 .. 42 6 6 42 6 6 8 __ 8 8 8 8 8 46 2 6 6 6 6 6 32 2 6 6 6 6 6 6

Wel

l fin

ish

S S S .. -- 0 S S -- __ S __ S S X P S 0 0 S S S S S 0 T S S S S S Z T P -- S P S S S

Wat

er

leve

l (f

t)

118.

0080

.00

--

289.

0020

2.80

80.0

038

5.00

380.

00

__37

8.00

22.0

0o/r

Q

Tcb

.oi

19.3

7

370. 22

.60

__ 88.0

0F F +7

.10

22.2

49.

07+1

0.60

+10.

20 .74

__ 79.2

072

.46

__ 33.7

313

.00

40.0

0-- __ 48.0

677

.60

59.7

065

.00

Dat

e w

ate

r le

vel

mea

sure

d

3-26

-70

10-

4-69

__ 5-22

-76

4-

7-67

6-

7-55

11-

6-74

11-

6-74

__ 3-14

-75

12-

-46

4-

7-67

10-1

6-74

6-

1-78

10

1-74

__ 9-19

-53

5-

2-74

1974

12-1

2-74

11-2

6-74

11-2

6-74

12-1

2-74

12-1

2-74

12-

6-74

__ 3-

5-75

3-

5-75

-- __ 3-

5-75

3-

5-75

3-12

-69

-- __ 3-14

-75

5-18

-76

5-18

-76

9-30

-65

Speci

fic

cap

aci

ty

(gp

m/f

t)

9.3

1.5

2.0

-- __ 1.1

__ -

.3 .6 2.

66.

1 4

.6-- ..

.4 .4 .8 __ __

.2 __

.5 .2

.2

Aq

uife

r

5 5 5 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 6 6 4 6 6 4 4 4+6

-- 4 4 6 6 6

Logs

a

vail

- a

ble G G G __ -- G G G -- __ G G G G G G G G G G G G -- .. G G G G G __ G G -- G G G G G

Dat

a re

lia

b

ility

U U U C C U C C C C C C C r U r U r u U U U C U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U C C C C U

TABL

E 15.--Records o

f se

lect

ed w

ells i

n th

e Tu

lali

p In

dian

Reservation Continued

Lo

cal

well

num

ber

30

/4-1

7B1

6-1

7B1

7-1

7C1

-17J

1-1

7J2

-17K

1-2

1 G

l-2

1 G

l S-2

1J1

-21J2

-21K

1S-2

1 Q

l-2

2L1

-23H

1-2

3J1

-23Q

1-2

5K1

-26G

1-2

6N1

-28A

1

-35R

1-3

5R2

-36A

1-3

6B1

-36 F

l

-36F

2-3

6 F

3-3

6 F4

-36F

5-3

6F6

-36

F7-3

6 F8

-36F

9-3

6F10

-36F

11-3

6F1

2

-36H

1-3

6J1

-36J2

-36J3

-36

J4

-36J5

-36

J6-3

6J7

-36J8

-36J9

Wat

er

Ow

ner

use

Gar

vey

And

erso

nS

pee-

Bi-D

ah

Com

mun

ity

Wat

er

Co.

Da

vid

M

ille

rD

on

Par

dee

Tu

lalip

S

hore

s,

Inc.

Arc

adia

W

ater

D

istr

ict

Ed

Poo

lU

pper

T

ula

lip

Heig

hts

Why

te

Tu

lalip

H

eig

hts

In

c.

Edm

und

H.

Lin

dst

rom

Pau

l H

esby

Ma

rvin

T

urk

Ed

Seb

ers

Mar

y svi lie

T

est

H

ole

No.

4

Be

rt

Woo

ding

Tu

lalip

T

rib

eH

erm

osa

Po

int

Doc

k an

d W

ater

A

ssoc

.

Potlatc

h

Bea

ch

Wat

er D

istr

ict

Cla

yton

01 s

onV

icto

r M

oses

Da

vid

S

penc

erP

alm

er

M.

Mur

phy

R.

Ras

mus

sen

A.

J.

Fis

he

rF

. W

itch

ey

J.

R.

Ke

lly

F.

Hu

let

-do

J.

R.

Ke

lly__

do

R.

L.

Fra

ser

Mon

te

Mur

phy

Gilb

ert

M

oses

H.

Men

cke

W.

Col

fe

ltJ.

I.

Pau

lJ

. B

ynam

Port

er,

A

. B

uell

Mul

key

Am

eric

an

India

n

Mis

sion

W.

Wh

itlin

ge

r

H H P H H P P U P U P H H H H H U H Z P P H H H H U H H H H H H U U H H H U H H H H H H U H

Altitude

of

lan

d

surf

ace

(ft) 95 80 no 270

270

190

175 50

160

182

130 20 100

195

170

220

180 92 140 60 128

117

180

160

225

215

230

210

220

210

190

205

210

210

220

220

165

136

135

145

140

145

135

135

140

140

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 120

127

372

228

207

507

375 _

380

241 _ 20

107 24 12 75

344

140

166

163

171

161

190 45 16 12 35 34 155

148

172 25 65 23 139

192 11 70 70 35 8

165

Casi

ng

dia

m

ete

r (in.) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 _ 6 6 _ 48 6 36 42

612

6 6 6 6 6 636 36 42 42 -- 6 642 42 42 6 __ 30 6 10 10 42 42 42 6

Wel

l fin

ish

S S P S S P S __ S S _ 0 F S 0 0 S S S _ X _ S _ S _ __ __ __ --

Wat

er

leve

l (f

t) 64.8

51

89

.00

184.0

0

186.8

0151.9

0_

150.0

0156.2

0

__13.0

06

0.0

01

7.0

08

.40

51.0

0 2.0

0

44.7

0

123.6

01

12

.62

__6

4.5

9 9.9

77

.00

15.8

2 --

75

.00

97

.00

Dry 9.6

41

13

.00

__ 7.7

0122.5

0_ _

130.6

92.1

3

--

Dat

e w

ate

r S

pa

cific

le

ve

l capacity

mea

sure

d (g

pm

/ft)

2.2

8

-30

-74

6

.05-2

5-7

8

2.0

11

-29

-77

1

.3

12-1

5-7

58

-30

-74

1

.0 19

71

2.0

8-1

3-7

5

.9

_-

8-

1-7

3

1.4

5-1

5-7

4

.52

-22

-74

10

-27

-77

5-1

9-7

7

4.3

11-1

5-7

8

.8

4-1

8-6

7

1.2

4-2

0-6

711-2

6-7

4

2.5

__9_

19_7

4 9-2

0-7

49

-20

-74

9-2

0-7

4 19

7019

709-2

0-7

4

11-

8-7

41

1-1

1-7

5

_

__11-

6-7

49-1

9-7

4 _

- __

9-1

9-7

41-1

4-7

5__ -_

Aq

uife

r

4 4 7 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 5 6 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 2 2 4 4 2 5 2 2 5

Logs

a

va

il

ab

le G G G G G G G G G __ G G G G G G G G G G _ __ _ G __ _ _ G __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _

Dat

a re

lia

bility

C C C C U C C C C C C U C U C C U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

TABL

E 1

5.-

-Re

cord

s of

sele

cte

d w

ells

in

th

e T

ula

lip

India

n

Re

se

rva

tio

n C

on

tin

ue

d

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

30/4

-36J1

0-3

6J11

-36

J12

-36J1

3-3

6K1

-36K

2-3

6L1

-36L

2-3

6L

3-3

6 L4

-36N

1-3

6N2

-36 N

3-3

6N4

-36P

1

-36P

2-3

6P3

-36P

4-3

6P5

-36P

6

-36P

7-3

6P8

-36P

9-3

6P10

-36P

11

-36P

12-3

6P13

-36Q

1-3

6Q2

-36Q

3

-36Q

4-3

6R1

QC

DO

-ob

K£

-36R

3

30/5

-5C

1-5

C2

-5D

1-5

D2

-5D

3

-5E

1-5

E2

-5E

3-5

E4

-5E

5

Ow

ner

H.

Men

cke

Prie

st

Poin

t G

roce

ryR

ob

ert

E

. C

ress

Con

B

rade

L.

Jam

es

M.

Hu

tch

inso

nG

. D

eg

roo

tF

. S

mat

hers

F.

Osb

urn

W.

L.

Flo

ch

Ego

n B

auer

Ben

Will

iam

s,

Sr.

De

lbe

rt

Mor

den

Mo

rris

B

row

nM

. E

. V

ande

rpol

E.

Mye

rsP

rie

st

Po

int

Gra

nge

W.

Cra

wfo

rdA

delin

e

John

son

Gra

nt

E.

Ha

ll

d

o

Ang

l in

Ka

rl

A.

Lam

bert

E.

Mye

rsA

ngl i

n

John

ason

W.

Per

k in

sM

ilton

Hu

tch

inso

nR

. K

luin

T.

Win

e h

ell

La

rry

Kno

wle

sS

nug

Harb

or

Mo

bile

Ho

me

Par

k d

o

Chu

ck K

orf

f

Hug

o A

. Jo

hnso

n d

o

E.

Bu

rra

nB

. B

urns

Ro

be

rt

Dar

ney

J.

T.

Mor

e d

o

F.

Cam

pbel

lM

. Y

andl

e

Wat

er

use H U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H U H H I U U H H H H H P P H U U H H H H U U H U

Altitu

de

of

lan

d

surf

ace

(f

t) 135

135

140

140

155

140

200

190

160

195

105

no 95 9811

8

155

140

118

130

125

125

120

115

155

120

135

126

140

135

130

130

135

135

125 92 89 98 98 103 94 93 93 94 95

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 15 16

217

815

616

5 __ 15 60 38 135 10

125

125

152 35 36 146 25 148 17 15 20 172

153 32 8 34

158

154

155

140 9 29 22 24 23 10 27 17

123 15

Casi

ng

dia

m

ete

r (in

.)

36 4 6 6 6 42 36 42 48 6 36 6 6 6 42 44 6 42 6 36 42 42 42 42

6 6 42 36 46 6 10 10 6 _ 42 42 42 42 23 36 42 6

Wel

l fin

ish

S S S S __ S S S 0 S S _ 0 S S S S S S T P __ 0 P T

Wat

er

level

(ft)

12

.00

--1

32

.00

13

5.0

01

27

.00

_ 2.0

0 ~

105.0

06

.55

93

.70

97.0

011

3.61

13.5

61

15

.50

1

24

.90

8.0

0

12.5

0

130.0

0125.0

08.3

0

18.6

0

12

9.0

7126.0

0131.0

01

21

.00

_ 4.6

0

11.9

81

4.9

3

7.9

76

.14

F

Dat

e w

ate

r le

ve

l m

easu

red

11-

5-7

4--

7-1

8-7

75-2

3-7

82

- 2-

67

__9-2

0-7

4

10-

5-7

310-

7-7

411-1

8-7

510-

7-7

69-2

0-7

4

_11-

8-7

49-2

0-7

4

9-2

4-7

4

9-2

4-7

4

7-

-74

--

1-

8-4

99-2

8-7

68-

2-4

4

9-2

0-7

4

10

-21

-75

3-1

4-7

09-2

4-7

43

-31

-77

__11-

5-7

4__

11-

5-7

411-

5-7

4

10

-18

-74

10

-18

-74

_11-

5-7

4

Sp

ecific

ca

pa

city

(gpm

/ft)

-- 1.5

2.0

_ 1.5

4.0

3.8

_ __ __ 3.0

1.5

5.0

_ 26.0

__ __ _ 6.6

_ --

Aqu

i fer

2 5 5 5 5 2 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 2 5 2 2 2 4 2 5 5 2 2 2 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3

Logs

a

va

il

ab

le G G G G __ -- G G G __ G G _ G G G G G __ G __ _ _ G

Dat

a re

lia

bility

C C C U C C C C C C C C C U C C C C C C C C C C C U U C C C C C C U C C C C C C C C C C

TABLE

15. Records

of s

elec

ted

wells

in the

Tulalip

Indian Re

serv

atio

n Co

ntin

ued

CO cr>

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

30/5

-7G

2-7

G3

-7G

4-7

G5

-7G

6

-7G

7-7

G8

-7H

1-7

K1

-7K

2

-7K

3-7

LI

S-7

R1

-8 E

l-8

E2

-8E

3-8

E4

-8F

1-8

F2

-8F

3

-8F

4-8

J1-8

L1-8

L2-8

L3

-8M

1-8

M2

-8M

3-8

M4

-8M

5

-8M

6-8

M7

-18Q

1-1

9M1

-20B

1

-20F

1-2

0G1

-20G

2-2

0G3

-20G

4

-20G

5-2

0K1

-20K

2-2

0K3

-20K

4

Ow

ner

Goe

nG

. F

elg

ar

Fre

d M

oeN

orm

an

Des

R

osi

ers

Goe

n

Don

B

ates

Den

ny

Mor

gan

Dal

e B

anta

mJ.

Cle

venger

G.

Bar

thol

omew

H.

Wilk

ens

R.

Sta

ple

sT

ula

lip

Tribe

J.

Chr

ism

anR

. H

artm

an

__ D.

01 s

onC

harles

Ana

bel

D.

W.

Ha

ll d

o

J.

Wom

ack

Ric

hard

S

napp

sB

. M

. H

arr

ison

P.

Flo

od

S.

Hod

gson

E.

Ber

gM

. Jo

hnso

nR

. La

gerw

eyR

. S

tord

al

d

o

R.

Har

tman

E.

C.

Sm

ithT

ula

lip

Trib

eM

ary

svill

e

Test

H

ole

No.

1

Tu

lalip

T

ribe

R.

L.

Ha

rris

on

She

l don

E.

Will

iam

s d

o

Arn

old

M

cKay

d

o

G.

Will

iam

sT

ula

lip

Trib

eM

art

in

Will

iam

s d

o

Wat

er

use H H H U H H H H H H H H U H H U H H U H H H H H H H H H H H H H U Z U H H H U H H H U H H

Altitude

of

lan

d

surf

ace

(f

t) 140

150

125

240

150

255

240

105

160

120

130

320 75 76 76 77 77 73 74 74 75 63 75 74 74 75 76 76 76 76 77 78 80 510 45 43 45 44 44 44 45 43 38 42 42

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 26 23 9

135 70 147

102 19 60 68 20 137 -_ 11 __ 15 8 19 12 27 12 16 14 13 15 16 10 10 9 8 88 482 40 28 12 22 61 13 22 31 --

Casi

ng

dia

m

ete

r (in.)

42 42 426 6 6 6 42 426 36 6 42 __ 42 42 42 42 42 28 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 6 6 36 24 42 426

42 36 42 42

Wel

l finis

h

S 0 0 0 __ 0 T ~ T T __ __ __ __ 0 S __ S __ 0 __ --

Wat

er

leve

l (f

t)

22

.20

19

.60

7.01

102.1

033.0

0

132.0

091

.8

.16

55.0

62

3.0

0

6.0

0--

30

.00

6.7

9

__ 7.2

01

3.0

0

6.6

81

6.1

56

.37

5.6

3 5

.48

6.0

05.0

02

.00

2.0

0

8.0

05.8

0+

9.6

0 7.7

5

10

.40

9.7

61

0.0

0 6.4

0

4.3

41

3.9

81

5.9

5__ --

Dat

e w

ate

r S

pacific

le

vel

ca

pa

city

mea

sure

d (g

pm

/ft)

10

-15

-74

10

-16

-74

10

-16

-74

12

-15

-76

3

.01

2-2

3-7

7

1.3

12-

7-7

7

1.7

8-2

8-7

810-1

6-7

410-

9-7

419

70

10-1

5-7

4_

10

-12

-76

10-2

9-7

4

__

__

10

-29

-74

10

-29

-74

10-2

9-7

410-

9-7

41

0-1

6-7

410-

9-7

4

10-

9-7

410-

9-7

410

-9

-74

10-

9-7

410-

9-7

4

10-

9-7

410-

9-7

48-

31 -

76

10-

9-7

4

9_

9.7

49

- 6-7

49

- 6-7

4

1-1

9-7

6

.1

5_17

_76

1-1

4-7

53

- 7-7

5-_ __

Aq

uife

r

4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Logs

a

va

il

able G G G G -- __ -- G __ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ __ G G G __ _ G __ G __

Dat

a re

lia

bility

C C C C U U U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U U

TABL

E 15.-

-Reco

rds

of

sele

cte

d w

ells

in

th

e T

ula

lip

India

n

Re

serv

atio

n C

on

tinu

ed

CJ en

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

30/5

-5E

6-5

J1-5

J2-5

J3-5

K2

-5K

3-5

L2-5

M1

-5M

2-5

M3

-5M

4-5

M5

-5N1

-5P1

-5P

2

-5R

1-5

R2

-6A1

-6A

2-6

A3

-6B1

-6B

2-6

B3

-6B

4-6

B5

-6F1

-6F2

-6 H

I-6

H2

-6H

3

-6J1

-6J2

-6J3

-6J4

-6J5

-6K1

-6P1

-6P

2-6

P3

-6Q

1

-6Q

2-6

R1

-7F1

-7F2

-7G

1

Ow

ner

A.

Sea

rles

R.

Cam

pbel

lE.

V

anw

inkl

eF

rank

S

chu

elle

rD

orem

us

A.

To

rie

L.

N.

Loud

enbu

rgL.

M

. Lest

er

L.

N.

Loud

enbu

rgD

. R.

C

raig

do

B.

Port

er

L.

N.

Loud

enbu

rgA

. R.

C

urn

utt

D.

Lin

ge

l

H.

Hen

sley

Par

gas

R.

Jenn

ings

K.

Sta

vert

A.

Mill

er

W.

Hild

eR

. B

urge

nC

arol

Sm

i th

Ric

hard

L.

Lili

enth

al

Paul

N

eedh

am

0.

H.

Otto

V.

Todd

H.

C.

Yan

dle

Jerr

y C

art

er

K.

Ale

xand

er

Shu

hart

B.

G.

Had

win

F.

John

son

G.

Ges

me

~ Will

iam

S

chm

idt

J.

F.

Gro

w d

o

do

Pau

l W

atso

n

Jean

R

aym

ond

E.

Flic

kA.

D.

N

eal

Ral

ph

Pet

erso

nG

. E.

M

acqu

arry

Wat

er

use H H H H H H H H H H U H U H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H

Altitude

of

lan

d

surf

ace

(f

t) 95 81 80 75 74 77 85 75 86 92 93 93 84 83 85 78 78 128 98 97 208

192

205

208

140

200

210 96 96 96 91 92 94 95 95 192

215

235

235

215

225 90 275

270

160

Dep

th

of

we

ll (f

t) 10 20 25 6 ~ 11 11 12 10 14 11 120 26 12 18 17 12 11 16 3 80 97 76 60 20 85 109

129 _ 10 7

107 20 49 82 7 7

112

105 14 180

179 26

Cas

ing

diam

e

ter

(in.)

39 42 42 54 ~ 36 24 24 42 42 6 42 42 36 42 42 42 30 32 42 42 6 6 6 8 20 6 8 10 30 42 36 6 42 6 4 42 42 6 6 42 6 6 42

Wel

l finis

h

_ _ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 _ _ 0 0 p _ 0 ~ 0 s s s s ~

Wat

er

leve

l (f

t) 7.70

5.01

5.93

3.10 3.

936.

52 -- 6.

61

6.50

+28.

006.

38 4.0

0

1.22 8.

80

11.2

72.

0059

.00

77.0

015

.00

_ +3

1.00

+29

.90

+50.

82

_ 6.99

1.88

+20

.79

5.51

25.8

057

.77

4.10

4.03

75.0

0

74.0

07.

1414

2.00

145.

006.

25

Dat

e w

ate

r le

vel

mea

sure

d

11-

5-74

11-

5-74

11-

5-74

7-14

-44

~ 1-15

-75

10-2

9-74

--11

- 1-

74

11-

1-74

11-

1-74

10-2

9-74

10

-29-

74

__ 11

- 5-

74

11-

5-74

1 1 -

1-

7411-

5-74

6-21

-77

5-10

-77

12-1

2-78

_ _11

-26-

7411

-26-

748-

2-69

__11

- 1-

7411

- 1-

7410

-21-

751 1

- 1

-74

5-20

-77

11-

1-74

11-

1-74

11 -

1-

745-

2-69

4-17

-71

10-2

9-74

1970

11-

3-66

10-1

5-74

Sp

aci

fic

capaci

ty

(gp

m/f

t)

~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ _ 2.5

4.0

1.0

_ __ 2.5

2.6

_ __ ~ 1.0

_ 5.2

Aquife

r

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 3 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 5 4

Logs

ava

il -

able _ -- _ ~ ~ G G G G _ _ G G _ __ G G _ G G G G ~

Dat

a re

lia

b

ility

C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U C U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

TABL

E 15.-

-Reco

rds

of

sele

cte

d w

ells

in

th

e T

ula

lip

Ind

ian

R

ese

rvatio

n C

ontin

ued

00

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

30/5

-29L

1-2

912

-2913

-29L

4-2

9L5

-29L

6-2

9L7

-29L

8-2

9L9

-29M

1

-29N

1-2

9P1

-29P

2-2

9P3

-30B

1

-30B

2-3

0 B3

-30B

4-3

0B5

-30C

1 S

-30G

1-3

0G2

-30G

3-3

0H1

-30H

2

-30H

3-3

0H6

-30H

7-3

0H8

-30H

9-3

0J1

-30J

2-3

0J3

-30Q

1

-30R

1-3

0R2

-30R

3-3

0R4

-30R

5

-30R

6-3

0R7

-30R

8-3

1 A

l-3

1 A2

Ow

ner

G.

Ste

vens

onE.

Th

omps

onR.

D.

M

orga

n do

H.

C.

Heg

nes

Ella

C

orse

T.

Jacklin

J.

Bre

ckw

ell

L.

J.

Ch

rist

ian

sen

-- E .

Bal

am

Ace

J.

Wes

ter

d

o

C.

Ha

rtP

ete

Oil

Ion

Nor

a D

ill o

nR.

Ko

naD

alla

s T

ayl

or

Tom

R

eeve

s R

. Ko

naLo

uise

Ledfo

rdB

erni

ce

Par

ksH.

M

cAll

Gre

gory

Pon

cian

oJ.

M

. D

awso

n-- H.

T

urk

H.

McA

llVa

n D

yke

Cal

S

late

rL.

R

. D

amis

hM

. B

art

lett

L.

Jens

enG

. A.

E

ricks

on d

o

F.

Sol

om

enA

. M

oe

Wal

do

R.

Wic

kstr

omE.

M

eier

Gar

y S

tant

onS.

P

hili

pp

L.

R.

Sor

enso

n

Wat

er

use H H H H H H H H H U H H H H U U U U U U U U U H H H H H H I H H H H H H H H H H H H H H

Altitude

of

lan

d

surf

ace

(f

t) 14 13 12 17 12 12 13 16 11 16 14 10 5 11 145

140

120

115

155

210

112

160

160 26 27 29 31 32 33 26 21 23 21 35 22 23 20 20 22 23 26 22 12 14

Dep

th

of

we

ll (f

t) 17 16 14 8 13 11 12 10 9 24 14 33 24 15 19 14 17 67 64 8 18 22 15 6 6 18 38 13 14 18 18 11 22 25 16 26

Cas

ing

diam

e

ter

(in.)

42 42 42 43 36 42 44 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 36 42 42 42 36 40 42 42 42

Wel

l fin

ish

-- __ _ __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 __ __ __ __ 0 __ _

Wat

er

leve

l (f

t) -- 8.0

08

.00

6.00

5.00

7.77

7.50

4.5

99.

00

7.39

6.00 20.8

0

9.84

_ 12.0

05.

00 10.4

553

.65

56.0

05.

11 __ 6.

46

__ 3.00 17

.76

5.71

4.0

04

.00

_ 14.0

02.

318

.00

--

Dat

e w

ate

r le

vel

mea

sure

d

9-11

-74

9-11

-74

11-2

6-74

9-18

-74

9-18

-74

9-18

-74

3-14

-75

12-1

2-74

11-2

6-74

9-1

8-7

4 9-11

-74

9-11

-74

8-

2-63

8-

9-63

9-11

-74

9-1

2-74

7-23

-63

9-10

-74

__ 11

-22-

74

_ 9-10

-74

9-12

-74

11-2

6-74

9-11

-74

9-11

-74

_ 9-18

-74

3-

7-75

9-1

2-74

Spaci

fic

cap

aci

ty

Aquife

r (g

pm

/ft)

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5

Logs

a

vail

- a

ble

'ji

__ __ _ _ _ _ __ G G G G G G G _ _ __ __ __ __ __ _

__ G _

Dat

a re

lia

b

ility

' C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

c C c

TABL

E 1

5.-

-Re

cord

s of

sele

cted w

ells

in

th

e T

ula

lip

Ind

ian

R

ese

rvatio

n C

ontin

ued

GO

Loca

l w

ell

num

ber

30/5

-20L

1-2

0L2

-20Q

1-2

0Q2

-29B

1

-29B

2-2

9B3

-29B

4-2

9B5

-29B

6

-29B

7-2

9B8

-29B

9-2

9B10

-29C

1

-29C

2-2

9C3

-29C

4-2

9C5

-29C

6

-29C

7-2

9C8

-29F

1-2

9F2

-29F

3

-29F

4-2

9F5

-29F

6-2

9G1

-29G

2

-29G

3-2

9G4

-29G

5-2

9G6

-29G

7

-29G

8-2

9H1

-29H

2-2

9J1

-29J

2

-29K

1-2

9K2

-29K

3-2

9K4

-29K

5

Ow

ner

C.

D.

And

erso

nH

. T

ryon

R.

Bu

rri

do

C

. A

. Em

ory

Jim

B

rady

Rob

ert

Mos

esB.

G

obin

A.

Hat

chQ

uil

Ced

a K

enne

l

do

A.

Che

erV

iola

To

pash

Arn

old

Che

erF.

S

he! d

on

Don

ald

T.

She

rlock

C.

W.

Moe

nD

. La

ddus

awD.

B

rode

rson

H.

Tur

ner

C.

Phill

ips

H.

Yoc

key

S.

Dor

sey

L.

E.

Wilk

ins

Geo

rge

G.

Gre

gg

__ Ma

rtin

W

illia

ms

C.

L.

Dav

isR.

G

renie

rM

aria

Mos

es

do

Law

renc

e C

harle

yM

. Sh

e! d

onLucill

e

Hat

chV

erl

Hat

ch

Owen

H

atch

T.

Lehn

J.

Kin

g d

o

Al f

red

Sam

Ric

hard

S

penc

erJ.

B

reck

wal

dG

oede

l

Wat

er

use H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H I H H H H H H H H U H H H H U H H H H H

Altitude

of

land

surf

ace

(f

t) 43 41 27 33 19 24 26 25 25 18 24 28 28 31 29 28 37 26 30 29 26 28 22 22 21 10 22 21 12 20 21 21 19 21 22 21 22 22 23 19 17 9 9 10 13

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 28 23 20 26 19 24 24 20 26 21 29 19 17 40 11 19 19 29 19 26 21 __ 18 16 33 33 29 17 21 18 17 18 19 29

Cas

ing

diam

ete

r (in.) 36 42 42 42 42 42 42 36 42 42 __ 42 42 42 48 42 42 42 36 42 42 42 42 42 42 _ 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 36 42 42 42 42

Wel

l fin

ish

0 0 0 __ 0 0 -- p 0 p _ 0 0 0 0 _ -- 0 0

Wat

er

leve

l (f

t)

12.0

012

.00

15.3

518

.50

11.6

9

10.4

39.

2211

.29

11.2

76.

00

8.28

8.21

12.0

014

.40

12.0

09.

00 10.4

010

.00

6.84

10.0

012

.00

_10

.63

10

.29

16.4

0

17.2

315

.00

12.2

511

.08

10.1

0

10.5

013

.00

11.2

2 9.

72

10.8

9 10

.00

Dat

e w

ate

r le

vel

mea

sure

d

9-

6-74

3-

7-75

9-

6-74

3-

7-75

9-

6-74

9-

6-74

9-

6-74

9-

9-74

3-

7-75

9-

9-74

9-

6-74

3-14

-75

5-16

-63

7-13

-44

4-13

-62

11-2

2-74

9-

6-74

5-1

5-63

11

-22-

749-

1 0-

747

- 2-

74

_ 3-

7-75

9-

9-74

9-

9-74

9-

9-74

5-

8-63

9-

9-74

1-14

-75

9-10

-74

3-

7-75

9-10

-74

9-10

-74

10

-20-

75

9-10

-74

9-1

8-7

4

Speci

fic

capaci

ty

(gp

m/f

t)

10.0

6.7

4.4

2.1

4.2

21.4

_ 2.5

2.5

4.0

__ -- 5.0

Aqu

i fe

r

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1

Logs

a

va

il

ab

le G G G G G G G G _ G G G G -- _ -- G G

Dat

a re

lia

b

ility

C C C C C C C C C C C C C U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C

TABLE

15.-

-Rec

ords

of

sele

cted

wells in the

Tula

lip

Indi

an Reservation Continued

CO

Lo

cal

we

ll nu

mbe

r

30

/5-3

1 B

l-3

1 B2

-31

B3-3

1 B4

-31

B5

-31

B6-3

1 B7

-31

B8-3

1 E

l-3

1 F1

-31

F2-3

1 F3

-31

F4-3

1 F5

-31

F6

-31

G1-3

1 G

2-3

1 G

3-3

1 G

4-3

1 G

5

-31

G6-3

1 M

l-3

1 M

2-3

1 M

3-3

1 M

4

-31

M5

-31

M6

-31

M7

-31

M8

Ow

ner

Dea

n S

haffer

W.

C.

Mor

gan

Hum

phre

y,

G.

Fre

d

Sau

nder

s d

o

E.

M.

John

son

W.

C.

Mor

gan

Edw

in

M.

John

son

Sta

n Jo

ne

s,

Sr.

D.

Jone

s

Hill

G.

E.

Ca

rpe

nte

rT

ula

lip

Jesu

s H

ouse

D.

Jone

sH

ill

L.

D.

Cla

doos

byG

len

Pa

rks

Wes

ley

Pa

tric

kB

uckn

erLe

na

Cla

do

osb

y

J.

L.

Cra

wl e

yE

. P

rice

E.

Par

ksG

. P

ark

sM

ad

elin

e

Jam

es

Tu

lalip

Je

sus

Hou

seR

ay

Price

Charles

Hill

Ma

rie

G

eorg

e

Wat

er

use H H H H I Z U H U U U U H U U U U U H U H U U U U U U U Z

Altitu

de

o

f la

nd

surf

ace

(f

t) 15 19 19 55 55 30 19 3013

0 80 85 no 95 80 90 14 38 57 14 17 11 120

100

130

130

130

122

118

130

Dep

th

of

well

(ft) 26 19 11 54 56 57 60 55

136 83 92 97 41 17 21 20 38 31 21 21 29 17 6 25 21 __ 19 19 70

Cas

ing

diam

e

ter

(in

.)

30 40 36 36 _ 6 6 6 6 6 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 _ 42 42 42 42 42

We

ll fin

ish

0 0 0 0 0 s s s p s 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 __ 0 __ 0 0

Wat

er

level

(ft) 1.0

011.0

08.0

04

6.0

04

6.0

0

22.0

0 24.4

9 63

.75

65

.37

90.1

332.3

51

2.0

01

6.0

0

6.7

715

.41

13.3

89.4

810.0

0

1.0

08

.36

__ 20.6

71

1.0

0

__1

2.0

03.

01D

ry

Dat

e w

ate

r le

ve

l m

easu

red

9-

-63

9-1

8-7

49

-18

-74

3-1

4-7

53-1

4-7

5

8-

9-5

7

11

-17

-75

2

-28

-64

11-1

7-7

51

1-1

7-7

511-

8-7

46

-28

-63

6-2

0-6

3

9-1

2-7

49

-12

-74

9-1

2-7

41

1-2

2-7

46

-11

-63

3-1

4-7

59-

1 2-7

4

9-1

8-7

45-2

9-6

3

__ 6-

6-6

33-

1 4-7

57-1

9-6

3

Spaci

fic

cap

aci

ty

(gpm

/ft)

8.3

2.0

20.0

__ 1.6

~ _ -- _ __ __ __

Aqu

i fer

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 2 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 2

Logs

avail

- able G G G G G G G G G G G _ G G G _ G _ G __ G _

Dat

a re

lia

bility

C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U

TABLE 16.--Water levels in selected wells

P, well being pumped; R, well pumped recently; S, nearby well being pumped; T, nearby well pumped recently

Well 29/4-1B2

Highest water level :Lowest water 1 evel :

Date

DecJanFebFebMarAprMayJunJulAug

12, 197414, 19751127141613132113

Date

OctFebMar

8, 197415, 197714

Waterlevel

103.80104.72104.89104.22104.29104.36104.00104.20104.30104.40

HighestLowest

Waterlevel

9.606.202.10

Highest

RRRRRRRRRR

Water

Date

Sep 22,Oct 20Nov 17Dec 15Jan 19,Jan 26Feb 17Mar 16Apr 19May 17

103.104.

levels

1975

1976

water level : 1 .water level

Water

Date

Apr 19,May 20Jun 21

water levelLowest water level:

Date

NovDecJanFebMarMayJunJulAug

14, 19741215, 1975111413132119

Waterlevel

199.50200.30200.92200.75199.87199.30199.40199.70199.90

Highest

Water

: 9.levels

1977

: 199201

levels

Date

Sep 22,Oct 21Nov 18Dec 16Jan 20,Feb 17Mar 16Apr 19May 17

water levelLowest water level :

Date

DecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep

12, 197415, 19751114161313211922

Waterlevel

80.3081.0181.1080.7080.4480.0080.1080.3080.4080.70

Water

Date

Oct 21 ,Nov 18Dec 16Jan 20,Feb 17Mar 16Apr 19May 17Jun 22Jul 16

1975

1976

: 79.82.

levels

1975

1976

75 feet below land89 feet below landin feet

Waterlevel

104.50103.75104.65104.40103.90104.10103.80104.10103.80104.00

Well

70 feet60 feetin feet

Waterlevel

2.101.704.40

Well

.10 feet

.20 feetin feet

Waterlevel

200.11200.17200.65200.60199.60199.20199.66199.40199.10

Well


Waterlevel

80.9381.2381.2080.8080.3080.4280.1079.9079.8079.80

below land

Date

R Jun 29,R Jul 16R Aug 31R Sep 21R Oct 12R Nov 15R Dec 15R Jan 18,R Feb 15R Mar 14

30/4-1C1

below landbelow landbelow land

Date

Jul 14,Aug 18Sep 15

30/4-1N1


Date

Jun 22,Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12Dec 15Jan 18,Feb 15Mar 14

30/4-3H1


Date

Aug 31 ,Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18,Feb 15

R May 14Apr 19May 20

surface datumsurface datumsurface datum

Waterlevel

1976 104.00104.00104.20104.20104.10104.30104.20

1977 104.10104.20104.10


Waterlevel

1977 5.907.708.10


Waterlevel

1976 199.20199.20199.50199.50199.80199.90

1977 200.20200.10200.10


Waterlevel

1976 80.0080.1080.380.680.6

1977 80.981.81.281.481.40

Oct. 20Feb. 11

R AprR MayR Jun

JulR Aug

SepOct

RR

May 20,Oct 8,

Nov

May 17Aug 18

AprMayJunJulAugSep

Jun 22,Nov 21,

JunJulAugSepNovFebJun

, 1975., 1975.

Date

19, 1977202114181527

1977.1974.

Date

21, 1977

, 1976., 1977.

Date

19, 19772021141815

1976.1977.

Date

21, 19771418152123, 197822

Waterlevel

104.50104.30104.30 R104.50104.50 R104.30104.10

Waterlevel

6.70

Waterlevel

200.40200.40200.70200.70201.20201.00

Waterlevel

81.7081.8082.0082.0082.3082.3082.2

141

TABLE 16.--Water levels in selected wells continued

Well 30/4-7G2

Highest water level: 20.86 feet below land surface datum Feb 11, 1975. Lowest water level: 28.56 feet below land surface datum Jul 21, 1975.

Water levels in feet below land surface datum.

Water Water WaterDate

Apr 7, 1967Oct 16, 1974Nov 14Dec 12Feb 11, 1975Mar 14Apr 16May 13Jun 13

level

26.8126.9625.6324.0920.8627.2227.7428.3028.48

Date

Jul 21, 1975Aug 19Oct 21Nov 18Dec 16Jan 20, 1976Feb 17Mar 16Apr 19

level

28.5628.3626.0125.8625.3024.4026.1026.2028.00

Date

May 18, 1976Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18, 1977Feb 15

level

25.8027.8026.6027.1025.4024.5024.0025.5025.50

Date

Mar 14, 1977Apr 19May 20Jun 21Jul 14Aug 18Sep 15

Water level

25.3027.7028.0028.0027.4027.1027.00

Well 30/4-7G3

Highest water level: 19.37 feet below land surface datum Oct 16, 1974.Lowest water level: 21.85 feet below land surface datum Feb 11, 1975.


MayOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Date

18, 197016, 1974141215, 197511141613

Waterlevel

20.1019.3720.1520.1320.0821.8519.9920.1720.20

HighestLowest

JunJulAugOctNovDecJanFebMar

water

Date

13, 1975211921181620, 19761716

level: 9.water level : 6.

Water levels

DecJanFebMarAprAprMayJunJulAug

Date

12, 197414, 19751114162413132113

Waterlevel

7.17.08.68.89.09.08.89.18.47.0

Highest

AugAugSepSepOctNovDecJanJanFeb

Date

19, 197525

82220171613, 19761917

water level : 21.Lowest water level: 30.

Water levels

NovDecJanFebMarAprAugAugSepSep

Date

26, 19741214, 19751114161319

89

Waterlevel

22.2422.1221.6621.3121.0421.3427.8025.4024.9024.00

SepOctDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Date

22, 1975201619, 1976181619172916

Waterlevel

20.4019.4520.4820.2820.1220.2020.0019.9020.20

Well


Waterlevel

7.06.57.57.07.06.86.86.88.18.6

Well


Waterlevel

26.2025.0824.4024.3024.1024.2523.9024.0525.927.1 R

Date

Apr 19,May 18Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18,

30/4-1 OL1

above landabove landabove land

Date

Feb. 18,Mar 16May 17Jun 29Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15

30/4-1 OL2


Date

Aug 31 ,Sep 21Oct 12

T Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18,Feb 15Mar 14Apr 19May 20

Waterlevel

1976 20.0020.1020.2020.2020.2020.2020.1020.00

1977 20.00

surface datum Octsurface datum Augsurface datum.

Waterlevel

1976 8.68.48.68.27.97.77.77.98.27.7

surface datum Marsurface datum Augsurface datum.

Waterlevel

1976 26.3 T27.0 R27.00 T25.50 T26.00

1977 25.50 T26.10 R25.3026.1024.70 T

FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep

27,25,

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctJun

14,8,

JunJulAugSepOctNovFebJun

Date

15, 197714192021141815

1977.1975.

Date

18, 197715141920211418152722, 1978

1975.1977.

Date

21, 197714

815272123, 197822

Waterlevel

20.0019.9020.2020.1020.1020.3020.4020.20

Waterlevel

7.77.98.68.88.68.68.48.28.89.58.2

Waterlevel

25.8026.5030.3027.3026.7026.7025.8028.5

TTTT

T

142


Well 30/4-10L3

Highest water level: 7.97 feet below land surface datum Mar 14, 1975. Lowest water level: 19.40 feet below land surface datum Aug 13, 1975.



Nov 26, 1974Dec 12Jan 14, 1975Feb 11Mar 14Apr 16Aug 13Aug 19Sep 9

Date

Dec 12, 1974Jan 14, 1975Feb 11Feb 27Mar 14Apr 16Apr 24

level Date

9.07 Oct 20,9.11 Dec 168.52 Jan 19,8.43 Feb 187.97 Mar 168.25 Apr 19

19.40 R May 1713.21 R Jun 2910.50 Jul 16

Highest water levelLowest water level :

Water levels

Waterlevel Date

10.60 Aug 25,11.30 Sep 911.40 Oct 2111.40 Nov 1712.10 Dec 1611.60 Feb 18,11.40 Mar 16

level Date

1975 13.28 Aug 31 , 197612.80 R Sep 21

1976 12.80 T Oct 1210.70 Nov 1511.06 Dec 1511.20 Jan 18, 197711.01 Feb 1514.2 Mar 1415.5 R Apr 19

Well 30/4-1 OL4

: 12.10 feet above land surface0.6 feet below land surface

in feet above or below {-) land

Waterlevel Date

1975 6.40 T Jul 16, 197610.40 Aug 317.40 Sep 213.30 S Oct 124.40 R Nov 15

1976 9.00 Dec 158.60 Jan 18, 1977

level Date

16.1 T May 20, 197715.1 R Jun 2115.20 R Jul 1414.80 T Aug 1813.10 Sep 1512.30 Oct 2712.70 T Nov 2112.20 Jun 22, 197814.00

datum Mar 14, 1975.datum Aug 31 , 1976.

surface datum.

Waterlevel Date

3.0 Feb 15, 1977-0.6 R Mar 144.2 T Apr 193.70 T May 201.00 R Jun 214.40 Jun 22, 19786.70

Waterlevel

12.00 T13.40 T14.30 R18.60 R16.20 R16.50 T15.80 T16. T

Waterlevel

6.30 R5.602.605.30 R3.50 R

-0.15 R

Well 30/4-10L5

Highest water level: 12.20 feet above land surface datum Mar 14, 1975.Lowest water level: 1.0 feet below land surface datum Aug. 31, 1976.

Water levels in feet above or below (-) land surface datum.

Date

Dec 12, 1974Jan 14, 1975Feb 11Mar 14Apr 16Aug 25

Waterlevel

10.2010.8011.7012.2012.204.00

Highest

Date

Sep 9,Oct 21Nov 17Dec 16Jan 19,

T Feb 18

water levelLowest water level :

Date

Oct 12, 1976Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18, 1977

Waterlevel

79.8080.4080.9081.50

Water

Date

Feb 15,Mar 14Apr 19May 20

Waterlevel

1975 8.705.803.703.50

1 976 2 . 507.40

Well

: 79.80 feet83.60 feet

Date

Mar 16,Jul 16

S Aug 31R Sep 21R Oct 12

Nov 15

30/4-1 7B2

below landbelow land

levels in feet below land

Waterlevel

1977 81.6081.9082.0082.30

Date

Jun 21,Jul 14Aug 18Sep 15

Waterlevel

1976 6.002.8 R

-1.0 R2.8 T3.50 T1.20 R

surface datum Octsurface datum Novsurface datum.

Waterlevel

1977 82.4082.6083.0083.00

Date

Dec 15, 1977Jan 18, 1977Feb 15Mar 14Apr 19May 20Jun 21

12, 1976.21, 1977.

Date

Nov 21, 1977Feb 23, 1978Jun 22

Waterlevel

3.504.804.60 T4.802.104.20 R3.20 T

Waterlevel

83.6083.1081.9

143

TABLE 16. Water levels in selected wells continued

Well 30/4-17C1

Highest water level: 63.40 feet below land surface datum Dec 15, 1976. Lowest water level: 65.90 feet below land surface datum May 13, 1975.



AugOctNovDecJanFebFebMarMar

30, 197415141215, 19751127

514

level

64.8564.2464.7164.1064.7764.2865.1064.3965.67

Date

Apr 16, 1975May 13Jun 13Jul 21Aug 19Sep 22Oct 20Nov 14Dec 15

Highest water level: 155.Lowest water level: 157.

Date

AugAugSepOctNovDecJan

13, 1975252220171519, 1976

Waterlevel

156.20156.40156.60156.50156.10156.20156.90

Water levels

Date

Feb. 17, 1976Mar 16Apr 19May 17Jun 29Jul 16Aug 31

Highest water level: 113.Lowest water level: 114.

Date

SepOctNovDecJan

20, 197418141215, 1975

Waterlevel

113.61113.68114.20113.60114.10

Water levels

Date

Feb 11, 1975Mar 14Apr 16May 13Jun 1 3

level

65.8865.9065.9065.5064.9064.9064.1164.5064.50

Well


Waterlevel

156.10156.50156.20156.70156.50156.10156.40

Well


Waterlevel

114.30113.88113.79113.30113.40

Date

Jan 20,Feb 17Mar 16Apr 19May 18Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12

30/4-21J2


Date

Sep 21 ,Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18,Feb 15Mar 14

30/4-36P1


Date

Jul 21,Aug 13Sep 22Nov 17Dec 15

level

1976 64.1064.40 R64.1065.6065.20 R65.20 R64.5064.3064.30

surface datumsurface datumsurface datum.

Waterlevel

1976 157.40155.90156.20155.90

1977 155.30156.10155.80


Waterlevel

1975 113.60114.40113.60114.10113.70

Date

Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18, 1977Feb 15Mar 14, 1977Apr 19May 20Jun 21Jul 14Sep 15

Jan 18, 1977.Jul 14, 1977.

Date

Apr 19, 1977May 20Jun 21Jul 14Aug 18

Feb 17, 1976.Aug 13, 1975.

Date

Jan 19, 1976Feb 17Mar 16

Waterlevel

63.5063.4064.4064.0064.3064.6065.5065.3064.4064.00

Waterlevel

157.70156.40156.30157.80155.90

Waterlevel

113.50113.00113.40

Well 30/4-36P3

Highest water level: 6.79 feet below land surface datum Jan 19, 1976.Lowest water level: 16.80 feet below land surface datum Apr 19, 1977.


Date

Nov 8, 1974 Dec 12 Jan 15, 1975Feb 11Mar 14Apr 16 May 13 Jun 13Jul 21

Waterlevel

13.56 13.22 9.588.837.89

11.49 8.90

12.4113.22

Dat(

Aug 13, Sep 22 Oct 20Nov 17Dec 15Jan 19, Feb 17 Mar 16Apr 19

1975

1976

Waterlevel

13.5914.3010.966.978.856.799.90

10.107.36

Date

May 17,Jun 29Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18,

Waterlevel

1976 11.3012.5012.9013.5013.6013.8014.3014.20

1977 12.60

DateWater level

Feb 15, 1977 13.70Mar 14 11.80Apr 19 16.80May 20 10.10Jun 21 12.50Jul 14 13.80Aug 18 14.70Sep 15 13.90

144


Well 30/5-5E2

Date

Oct 18, 1974Nov 14Dec 12Jan 15, 1975Feb 11Mar 19Apr 24May 13Jun 13

Date

Oct 18, 1974Nov 14Dec 12Jan 15, 1975

Date

Nov 1, 1974Nov 20Jan 15, 1975Feb 11Mar 19

Date

Nov 26, 1974Dec 12Jan 15, 1975Feb 11Feb 27Mar 19Apr 16May 13Jun 13

Highest water level: 2.07 feet below land surface datum Jan 20, 1976.Lowest water level: 6.25 feet below land surface datum Nov 14, 1974.


Water Water Waterlevel Date level Date level Date

6.14 Jul 21, 1975 5.38 Jun 22, 1976 4.50 Mar 14, 19776.25 Aug 19 5.68 Jul 16 5.00 Apr 195.66 Oct 21 5.15 Aug 31 5.00 May 202.43 Dec 16 2.30 Sep 21 5.20 Jun 212.45 Jan 20, 1976 2.07 Oct 12 5.40 Jul 142.11 Feb 17 3.00 Nov 15 5.20 Aug 183.63 Mar 16 3.40 Dec 15 4.60 Sep 153.22 Apr 19 2.40 Jan 18, 1977 3.804.79 May 18 4.00 Feb 15 4.30

Well 30/5-5E3

Highest water level: 2.29 feet below land surface datum Mar 19, 1975.Lowest water level: 6.37 feet below land surface datum Nov 14, 1974.



6.29 Feb 11, 1975 2.56 Jun 13, 1975 4.92 Dec 16, 19756.37 Mar 19 2.29 Jul 21 5.505.07 Apr 24 3.75 Aug 19 5.982.55 May 13 3.34 Oct 21 5.28

Well 30/5-6B1

Highest water level: 5.30 feet below land surface datum Apr 19, 1976.Lowest water level: 12.94 feet below land surface datum Nov 20, 1974.



11.27 Apr 24, 1975 6.06 Sep 22, 1975 11.93 Feb 17, 197612.94 May 13 6.28 Oct 21 12.20 Mar 1611.50 Jun 13 9.61 Nov 18 11.59 Apr 1910.13 Jul 21 10.06 Dec 16 8.91 May 186.60 Aug 19 11.12 Jan 20, 1976 5.94 Jun 22

Aug 31

Well 30/5-6H1

Highest water level: 33.10 feet above land surface datum Jun 22, 1976.Lowest water level: 29.90 feet above land surface datum Feb 11, 1975.

Water levels in feet above land surface datum.


31.00 R Jul 21, 1975 31.00 R Apr 19, 1976 32.60 Jan 18, 197730.40 R Aug 19 31.00 R May 18 32.90 Feb 1532.00 R Sep 22 31.00 R Jun 22 33.10 Mar 1429.90 R Oct 20 32.00 Jul 16 32.40 Apr 1932.40 R Nov 18 32.20 Aug 31 31.50 May 2031.50 R Dec 16 32.20 Sep 21 32.00 Jun 2130.10 R Jan 20, 1976 32.20 Oct 12 31.70 Jul 1431.00 R Feb 17 32.60 Nov 15 32.20 Aug 1831.00 R Mar 16 32.60 Dec 15 31.50 Sep 15

Waterlevel

3.103.703.004.405.005.605.60

Waterlevel

2.42

Waterlevel

6.306.135.306.308.20

11.20

Waterlevel

32.2032.2031.0032.2032.2032.2031.5031.0031.30

145


Well 30/5-7G2

Highest water level: 5. Lowest water level: 22.

Water levels

Water

OctNovJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Date

15, 19742015, 1975111924131321

level

22.2022.7011.9210.506.02

12.0612.5516.8521.04

Highest

Date

Aug 19, 1975P Sep 22

Oct 21Nov 18Dec 16Jan 20, 1976

P Feb 17Mar 16

P Apr 19

water level : 102Lowest water level: 103

DecJanFeb

Date

15, 197618, 197715

Waterlevel

102.10102.50102.50

Water levels

Date

Mar 14, 1977Apr 19May 20

62 feet below land surface datum Jan 20, 70 feet below land surface datum Nov 20, in feet below land surface datum.

Water Waterlevel

20.87 P21.05 P16.3313.01 P7.595.629.90

11.818.10

Well

.10 feet

.40 feetin feet

Waterlevel

102.70102.90102.90

MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan

Date

18,2216312112151518,

level

1976 10.7016.4018.4018.7020.0022.1022.3018.90

1977 18.30

FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep

1976. 1974.

Date

15, 197714192021141815

Waterlevel

18.6013.8014.8013.1015.4018.5020.6020.50

R

P

R

30/5-7G5

belowbelowbelow

JunJulAug

landlandland

Date

21,1418


Waterlevel

1977 103.00103.00103.30

Dec 15Nov 21

SepNovJun

, 1976., 1977.

Date

15, 19772122, 1978

Waterlevel

103.20103.40102.5

Well 30/5-8L1

Highest water level: 0.35 feet below land surface datum Feb 11, 1975.Lowest water level: 8.08 feet below land surface datum Sep 12, 1945.


Date

SepDecMarAprJun

12, 1945281, 1946

1625

Waterlevel

8.083.202.393.074.54

Highest

AugOctDecFebApr

water

Date

10, 194629

13, 194718

level: 7.Lowest water level: 10.

Water levels

Date

SepNovNovDecJanFebMarAprAprMay

6, 197414221214, 19751114162413

Waterlevel

9.7610.6310.4510.619.078.507.257.767.957.95

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMar

Date

13, 197521132220171519, 19761716

Waterlevel

6.638.035.592.322.73

Well


Waterlevel

8.609.63

10.4410.3810.469.727.727.317.907.96

JunOctNovNovDec

Date

4, 194716, 1974142012

Waterlevel

5.636.376.826.797.16

JanFeb

Date

15, 197511

Waterlevel

2.860.35

30/5-20G1

below land surfacebelow land surfacebelow

AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJan

land surface

Date

19, 1976172316312112151518, 1977

datum Mardatum Decdatum.

WaterLevel

7.60 R7.70 R8.70 R9.10 R9.90 R

10.20 R10.2010.5010.7010.40

14,15,

FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepNov

1975.1976.

Date

15, 19771419202114181521

Waterlevel

10.109.709.60 P9.30 P9.509.90 P

10.5010.7010.30

146


Well 30/5-29G7

Highest water level: 8.64 feet below land surface datum Mar 14, 1975. Lowest water level: 11.50 feet below land surface datum Dec 15, 1976.



Sep 10, 1974Oct 15Nov 14Dec 12Jan 14, 1975Feb 11Mar 14Apr 16May 13Jun 13

level

10.1010.8110.079.68

10.829.938.648.799.179.63

Date

Jul 21, 1975Aug 13Sep 22Oct 20Nov 17Dec 15Jan 19, 1976Feb 17Mar 16Apr 19

level

10.2210.6311.1111.2711.019.759.168.909.328.99

Date

May 17, 1976Jun 23Jul 16Aug 31Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15Dec 15Jan 18, 1977Feb 15

level

8.809.50

10.0010.6010.8011.11.311.511.511.5

Date

Mar 14, 1977Apr 19May 20Jun 21Jul 14Aug 18Sep 15Nov 21

Water level

11.310.710. 10,10.11. 11,11.3

Well 30/5-31G2

Highest water level: 1.47 feet below land surface datum Jan 19, 1976.Lowest water level: 19.42 feet below land surface datum Dec 12, 1974.


Date

Sep 12, 1974Oct 18Nov 14Dec 12Jan 14, 1975Feb 11Mar 14Apr 16May 13

Waterlevel

15.4116.6018.7719.42

5.243.832.89

11.561.97

Date

Jun 13, 1975Jul 21Aug 13Sep 22Oct 20Nov 17Dec 15Jan 19, 1976Feb 17

Waterlevel

15.4616.2016.8918.1519.0116.89

2.971.477.00

Date

Mar 16, 1976Apr 19May 17Jun 23Jul 16Aug 13Sep 21Oct 12Nov 15

Waterlevel

3.401.55

10.4014.0014.6016.1016.7017.4018.30

Date

Dec 15, 1976Jan 18, 1977Feb 15Mar 14Apr 19May 20Jun 21Jul 14Aug 18Sep 15

Waterlevel

19.0019.0019.4011.2011.803.506.60

17.3017.9018.50

147

TABLE 17.--Chemical quality of ground water from selected wells

Sitenumber

29/4-1 Al

-1A2

-1A3-1B1-1B2

-1B3

-1B6

-1C1

-1C2

-1C3-1D1

-1G2

-1G3

-1G6

30/4-1 Ml

-INI

-3C1

-3H1

-6F1-6L1

-6P1

-7G2

-7G3-10L1

-10L2-10L3

s-3

00

I/

GGSGSSGSGGSGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGSSSSGSSSSSSGSGGSS

GGGGGGG

S

SSSGGSGSSSSGGGGGSSGGSGGSGGSS


Welldepth

2/

172

146

146106160

172

196

165

160

130120

132

130

71

426

257

179

105

311231

190

60

4565

9495

Datesample

collected

10-12-604-24-61S- 3-654-19-579-12-72

12- 4-746- 6-789-12-724-19-674-19-679-20-732-27-75

10-20-7512-15-751-19-761-26-762-17-763-16-764-19-765-17-766-29-767-16-769-21-76

10-12-7611-15-7612-15-7610-27-778- 1-721- 3-738-17-73

10- 6-7310-21-753-20-724- 4-724-17-725-22-727-17-72

10-17-724-19-678- 3-72

10-21-756- 6-788-29-75

11 -9-75

11-18-754-19-47

11-18-754-19-474-19-674-19-474-19-676- 6-78

12- 1-71

5-28-656- 6-652- 1-74

11-18-7511-15-767-15-70

11-15-765-11-707-27-72

11- 8-7210-26-7311-18-755-17-766- 7-784- 7-676- 7-783-12-729- 5-746- 7-784- 7-671-24-746- 7-78

11-14-747-11-744-24-751-19-765- 2-747-11-74

Dissolvedsilica(S102 )

3130 --

14« --

20-- -__-.-_--- ---- .. --

2818

-- __

35293430

15 --

21

_-- -- --

15

no--

39

14

35141421 --------

5019

--

44 .,------3636

Dissolvediron(Fe)

0.31--

.19

.10

.03

.06--

.34-- __ -- ---- __.--._---.0.16.07

--__

.16

.24

.72

.14

.06

.26

.82 --

.06

.26

_--._------ ._

.20

8.8.09.05 .-

.15 .0.74.12.44 --

.26

.05

.05 ._

.90 .-

.0

.20

Dissolvedmanganese(Mn)

-- 0.012

.01

.003--

.006-- ._ ---- -_ __--

.001

.006

.0

.00

.003

.024

.00

.00

.009

.006 --

.04

.07

_-- -- -.

.009

.07--

.03

.003 .03.05.01.01 --

.043

.05

.00 ._

.07 --

.01

.01

Dis-sol vedcalcium(Ca)

1922

23

18

__

__ ..

172229

_.15119.2

11367.6 18

24

_.--_.---_

.6

40

13

_.16 5.6

168.8

29

1420 16

16

8.814

Dis-sol vedmagnesium

(Mn)

2019

12

17

__

__

__

..___.

8.31117

_393634261132__27

18

__-- --

4.9

7.5

..5.8 8.39.7

268.8

1313--._13--

12

1025

Dis-sol vedsodium

(Ma)

150140

19

__45

_

_

_

_____

_

113.9

13

_390500400380340250__

12__

8.2

_.- --

9.4

5.0

_5.3

_5.95.06.66.6

_

107

--_

12

3.6

3.22.6

Dis-sol vedpotassium

(K)

7.67.4

8.0

6

4.42.11.8

211818121213

3.1

--

--.---

1.0

.5

3.7

2.01.51.81.0

2.6 --_2.8

__

Bicarbonate(HCO )

3

100100

168

no

96nono

280210170190160180

98

129

__..

37

94

61

6298

14088

92110 _120

95

68160

AlkalinityasCaCOa

8282

138

90

799090

230172139156131148._80

102

.-____

30

77

50

5180

11572

7590 _

98

78

56131


5353

45

_54

221422

3.61227353319_22

15

_._

17

0.

11

3.05.68.69.3

3.74.3 _0.

_

1.9

3.55.3

Dis-sol vedchloride(CD

230210130

22

1824

11120

98110

180

no

120120

100

128.0

1818

820690620500480420

1110

9.67.5

7

1916

911104.0

400100

3.1

4.3

3.86.56.08.0

7.28.56.76.57.56.2

109.7

14115.0

4.35.0

Dissolvedfl uor-ide(F)

0.2.3

__

.2_-

___

.1

_

.-

..

._

_

.2

.1

.2

.4

.3

.3

.3

.2

.2_

.3

_.1.2

_

____

__.1

-_.1

.1

.1

.1

.1

.2

___

.2

.2___

.3_

.2

.1

.2

Totalnitrate(N)

0.27.18 _

1.5--

_6-.

_

._

__.

_

.62

.689.0

3.12.95.55.03.52.2_3.4

_3.21.8

_

___

_6.8

1.3.22

.0

1.1.01.19.5

___

.88

.24 _

.45___

.15

1.2.40

Totalnitrite(N)

.- _

0.01

_

.11._

_

._

_

_

.02

.03

.04__

.02

.06

.02

.58

.28

.10_

.01

_.01

._

____

_

.01

.01

.01

.01

.0

.07

.03

.01

.___

.06<-l

._.01

__

.01

.01

.01

148

Mi 1 1 i grams

Nitro- Total gen, phos- total phorus (N) (P)

---- -- ..-. -.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----

_-- -- ---- -- ----

-- -- ----------

_-- -- ------ -- -- ---- ---- --

0.26.17

.19 -.

.20 -- -- -- --

.13

.06

.23

_5.0.29

2.02.33.11.9

.11--

.22--

-- -- .0

_.--3.5--

.14 .10.44.16.0

-- -- --

.60

.63----

.49-- .08

-- .0.06

per liter

Dis solved solids

(residue at 1800C)

572552

-- --

212 ------

318 -- -- -- -- ---- --

150136172

_1,4401,3801,2401,1001,040

873

159--

162--

------------ --

86

_--

118

71-.

10095

143172

----------

146125

156--

87--

101168

Hard ness (Ca, Mg)

13213244 --107 --no -- -- -- -- -- -- --

76100140

__200180160140140150--150-- 136136

--170--

75--100 --44

1605663

36 4880

130no-- -- --

86100--

92 88 --64

140

Non- car bonate hard ness

4847 -- .-22 -- -- -- --6

55

_

422-_

16 74-- ----

------------ ----

_ -- 1136-- -- 1116 ---- 10--

810

Sodium Specific adsorp- conduc tion tance ratio (micro-

mhos)

5.7 1,0505.3 954

_-302

.-.8 240

305

216567

1.8 440

390640

._

650750672660740675630620635630

.5 210

.2 200

.5 220

21512 2,60016 2,38022 2,00014 1,68018 1,7208.9 1,400

312.4 240

230290286297

230

440__

269._

218196

.6 150

_._

.3 136170179

.3 123127

.4 152

.2 138

.3 140

.3 130122116195223198

.5 184

.3 215190275

.5 170246275

.2 118._

148.2 114.1 106

pH (units)

7.77.9

----7.97.9 7.6 -_7.8

__------ ------ 7.1 -- ----7.07.37.6

._7.38.37.17.58.17.5 7.4

-- 6.3

--

7.6--7.4

-_---_-..-7.0

_--7.57.5

__7.4

._7.47.07.37.37.6

--_._-.-7.48.0

__ 7.8

--_-7.6

-- 7.47.6

Water temper ature (°C)

10.510.0-- .___-_--9.5

--9.5

-- --10.09.99.89.8

10.1-- 9.5 ----

_. _-- 10.0_- -- .---

-- -- .--_._10.610

_-- _-_-- 9.9

11.4._12.4-- .__----9.5

------__--

Color (plat- i num- cobalt units

05

--

7 ._ _.

4__-- -- -- -- -- --

545

_201413112010

7--

2

-- --._.- _._.

2

_19

8

5_

5765

---- .-

24

.___

5--..

7--

46

Tur bidity (JTU)

----

0_.._

0_ -- -- -- -- -- --

010

_

311102

1--

0

-- _-__.-.._--

0

_

400 __

0_0011

-- ._

20 _

0--__

1--

10

Total col i form (col. per 100 ml)

---- -- ._ _. __ -- -- -- --

_ _--_._._ -.-.

-. _..__-_

_ -__ __ _..... .._,---._--^1 _

Remark s3

..15 mg/L total iron.Reported seawater intrusion pre-1957? Pb=none, Cu=none, Zn=none, Sb=none, ._Pb=0.07, Cu=none, Zn=0.47, Sb=none _--- C1(fie1d)=130 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=181 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=206 mg/L.C1( field) =206 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=206 mg/L.C1 rerun=120 mg/L; C1 (field)=219 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=244 mg/L.CK field) =231 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=244 mg/L. C1(fie1d)=238 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=225 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=225 mg/L. --

C1(fie1d)=22 mg/L. _Pumped continuously since 3/72.__ .- C1(fie1d)=22 mg/L. -.As<0.01, Ba<0.04, Cd=0.003, Cr=0.00,

Pb=0.01, Hg=0.000, Se<0.004, Ag=0.00.C1(fie1d)=27 ng/L.--C1(field)=22 ng/L. .. .._---

_Slight gas odor (sulfur?). _._-- C1(fie1d)=14 mg/L. ._ .--- ._Sample is from 30/4-7G2+3.Sample is from 30/4-7G2+3, +K1. --1 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.C1(fie1d)= 12 mg/L._--

149

TABLE 17.--Chemical quality of ground water from selected wells Continued


Sitenumber

30/4-1 OL4

-10L5

-17B2-17B13-17B14-17B16-17B17-17C1

-17K1

-21 Gl

-21J1

-21J2

-21K1-21 Q1-28A1

-35R1

-35R2

-36F4-36H1-36J7-36N3-36P1-36P3-36Q1-36Q3-36R1

30/5-5D2-5E6

-5J1

-5J2

-5K3

-5L1-5M3

01o

oin

I/

SsGGGGGSGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGS

GGSSSGGGGGSSGSSSssssGGSGGGGSSSGGGGSGGGGGGS

GGGGGGGGGGGGG

Welldepth

2/

96

101

142186no120127372

507

375

380

241

SP20

163

171

161

35192

8125152

363234

154

2410

20

25

n

n14

Date Dis-sample solved

collected silica(Si02 )

7-11-74 327-20-74 212-27-75 424-24-75

12-16-753-16-767-16-769-19-74 22

12-16-751-19-763-16-767-16-765-18-765-18-765-18-765-18-765-18-76

10-12-60 394-24-614- 7-67

H-14-742-27-75 40

10-20-753-16-765-18-767-16-764- 9-78

6- 7-784-18-672-16-727-13-721-24-74 39

11-14-7412-15-751-20-76

10-27-776- 7-782-16-729- 7-726- 7-781- 4-712- 8-73 219-12-74 26

10- 8-67 4211-12-6711 -12-672-16-726- 7-784-18-677- 8-746- 6-78

10- 5-60 405-24-614-20-678- 3-72 37

11 -17-72 3311-16-73 386- 6-78

11-26-742-27-75

11 -26-741-29-701-14-75

11-18-7511-17-751-15-758- 2-44

11-26-746-28-72 13

11-20-7411 -20-744-24-751-15-753- 7-754-24-75

11 -20-741-15-753- 7-751-15-753- 7-751-12-741-15-75

Dissolvediron(Fe)

1.2.12

2.3 --

.04--

--

.98

1.3

--

1.2

.50

.54

.5--

.16

.02

.04

.48

.07.01.41.4

.0

.04

.89

.48.12.01

1.0

.041.3

.04_---

.10

.10

.0

.07

.04

3.0.46

.01.04.07

1.3.5.04.04

Dissolvedmanganese(Mn)

0.06.05.07 ----

.04--

--

--

.15

--

.115

.00

.009

.03--

.23

.009

.14

.015

.18

.016

.0

.22

--

.23.22.05

--.079

------

.02

--

--

._


3714

9.1

--

17--

12

13

--

--

148.8

12

--

148.4

12241940

_-16

17

36

303632

_-n._

33

_-

--

.-

Dissolvedmagnesium

(Mn)

7.8146.3

--

14

--

n --

12

--

301510

1915

9.5n1417

8.8

8.3

19

181927

.-5.3

-.

7.3

_.

_.

Dis-sol vedsodium

(Na)

3.81.86.4

--

4.0

7.9

8.2

---_

7.89.5

n

7.89.4

6.99.26.0

50

10

3.8

n

12129.6

_.7.0

__

8.1

-.

_-

_.

Dis- Bicar-solved bonatepotas- (HC03 )sium

(K)

no66

1.9 61

no

2.2 10097

2.4 100

_-_2.5 1802.5 812.2 100

4.2 1501.9 98

1.6 1 001.6 1 90

1306.6

1.5 66.--_

94

3.4 224228

3.5 2052.9 1984.0 226

3.7 130

1.8 63

AlkalinityasCaC03

905450

90

8280

82

_ 148

6682

12380

82156107

54-_--

77

184187

168162185

107

52

Dis- Dis- Dissolved solved solvedsul- chlor- fluor-fate ide ide(S04 ) (CD (F)

13 5.5 0.210 6.0 .17.8 3.6 .1

5.0 4.5 .1

4.2 6.0 .1

8.05.8

5.8 6.6 .1

6.78.0

5.4 8.0 .17.2 12 .2

.0 5.1 .35.0

5.7.0 5.0 .1

2.8 7.2 .14.7

10 2.5 .13.9 6.5 .2.0 4.0 .2

4.7 13 .1176.5

.0 5.5 .34.7

1.2 6.0 .2_

7.51.3 14 .1

.0 7.5 .2

.0 5.9 .212

14 4.0 .1

25 10 .1

Total Totalni- nitrate trite(N) (N)

0.14 0.02.3 .00

--

.2 .01

.02 --

__

.15 .72

.12 .03

.35 .01_-

.-.14 .12.01 .01

1.9 .0.01 .00.2 .01

1.1 .03 --

.40 .03

.46_ .08 .05.01 .18.2 .03

_

.04 .00

1.6 .09

150

Ml 1 1 i grams per 1 i ter

Nitro gen, total (N)

.. 0.09

_-- -- -.-- -. -- --

.00-- ----

-- -- ---- -- ---------- -- -- -- -- ---- -- --

------« -- ------

Total phos phorus (P)

0.03.01

_..- .0

._

.-__ --

.15 .- --

--

.30

.20

.0 --

.45

.40

.45

.37

.64-- --.30

.12

.43

.60

.22

.04---- .20 ---- -._-.09

--

-- ---- -- -- --

Dis solved solids

(residue at 1800C)

157106119

_-- 121 -- ---- 130 -- 132 -- --

--163

96131 -- -- 125101

97172136------

88 -.

91--229----217209229---- 117 ---- --132

::---.------ «--------

Hard ness (Ca, Mg)

1209249

_----100 _--- --

7575

-- 82 --

160

8473 -- -- 120

82--

68100108170.---

76 76 170171--148168192-----.

50_.------120--112

-- ---- __-- -- --

Non- car bonate hard ness

3138

0

_----

9_-.----- -- --

00

--

0 -- --

--1218 -- -- --

2 -------- --12 --

00

67

-- -- --

60

----------._-- --

Sodium adsorp tion ratio

0.1.1.4

_--

.2 --

.4 --

.4-- --

--

.3

.5

.6 -- .3.4

.4

.4

.31.7 --

.5 .2

.-.4

_.--

.4

.4

.3----..

.4_-------..--

.3

--

-- ---- __-- -- --

Specific conduc tance (micro- mhos)

106138126

130132133148140144132120192234235233264182178181188189200156202202

180184180174160182170187187172160160159140160195660 --120409167130161364369355350340340366--._166 286490--..--174

--

-------- _------ --

PH (units)

7.68.07.7

_-- 7.7 .----- -- -- 7.77.7-- 7.8---- --

----7.57.37.9 ---- --7.47.1 7.47.58.06.56.77.07.6 7.9--7.47.7--7.87.88.2----._7.2 7.47.7--._--7.6

--

-- -- --..-- -- --

Water temper ature

.__-

_9.0

10.0-- 8.59.29.4 __ -- 11.010.0--9.59.5

10.29.69.99.5

-_ -- -.--9.6

---- -.12.410 -- __----10.6__ 9.5

10.0 __ __ 9.5

10.6108.0

----9.5

__9.4

--

10.58.19.09.08.9

11.09.09.08.58.0

11.57.5

Color Tur- (plat- bidity inum- (JTU) cobalt units)

25 25 0

20

._

7 0 _- -- -. 15 -- 10

_-

7 77 29 0 _--- __

6 18 0

_-40 7

7 14 0

10 757269

11 1

4 0

5 --

7 15 24 0

_-__ 30 3 --__------

0 1

--

_- __ _

Total col i form (col . per 100 mL)

_ ^-

.. -- -- -- --

-- -- -- -- ---- .- -- -- --

<1 ---- -_--

--

1 --<1 _. -- --

Remarks 3

..--

__------.- .. -- -- -- -- C1(fie1d)=14 mg/L.C1(fie1d)=19 mg/L. C1(fie1d)=19 mg/L.As<0.01, Ba<0.01, Cd <0.005, Cr<0.01,

Pb<0.01, Hg<0.001, Se<0.005, Ag<0.01-- C1(fie1d)=19 mg/L. -- -- -- ----.- -. -- -- -. -.--__ __C1(fie1d)=22 mg/L.C1(field)=18 mg/L. .___--

--

>2,000 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria. 4.3 mg/L total iron.

>2,000 col /TOO mL unidentified bacteria. 0.83 mg/L total iron. 2.4 mg/L total iron. --

151

TABLE 17. Chemical quality of ground water from selected wells Continued

Sitenumber

30/5-5M3-6B1

-6B4-6H1

-6R1-7G2

-8E2-8F4-8J1-8L1-BM1-8M7

-20F1

-20G1

-20K1

-20K2-20K3-20K4-20L1

-20Q1-20Q2-29B3-29B4-29B5

-29B8-29C3-29F1-29F5

-29G2-29G3-29G6

-29G8-29L5-29N1-30B1

-30B2-30C1-30G2

-30H1

-30HB-30R1-30R8-31 Bl-31 Fl-31 F3-31 G3

-31 G4-31 Ml

0)o30

I/

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGSSSCcCccGGGGGGQ

SGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

Welldepthy

16

9785

1426

1112271213

B

28

12

22

31

28

2026242026

21111918

333321

1789

33

24SP67

8

15131626839731

2117

Date Dis-sample solved

collected silica(Si02 )

2-27-75 161-12-744-24-75

10-27-772-27-75 34

12-16-751-20-763-16-764-19-765-18-767-16-769-21-76

10-12-7612-15-7611-20-7411-20-7401-15-754-24-751-15-75

11-20-7411-20-7411-20-741-15-75

11-20-741-15-753- 7-75

11-22-741-14-75

03- 7-754-24-75

11-22-744-24-75

11-14-752-27-759-20-73g-20-739-20-737-29-748-26-749-16-74

11-26-7411-26-741-14-753- 7-75

11-22-743- 7-751-14-753- 7-753- 7-754-24-752-27-75 14

11-22-7411-22-743- 7-754-24-75

11-22-743- 7-751-14-754-24-753- 7-75

11-26-7411-26-7411-22-742-27-751-14-75

12-15-7511-22-742-27-75 18

11-22-741-14-753- 7-754-24-75

11-22-7411-26-743- 7-754-20-674-20-67

11-17-7511-22-744-24-75

11-22-7411-22-74

Dissolvediron(Fe)

0.06.04

.05

.03

.13

.03

.03

.06

.02

.07

.022.9

.19

.27

.763.99.4

.06

.03

3.2.81.04.00.03.03.04

.04

.05

.05

.01

.01

.02

.04

.01

.01

.04

.09

.07

.03

.362.2

.18

.15

.07

.03

.02

.03

.09

.02


Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Dis- Bicar- Alka- Dis- Dis- Dis- Total Totalsolved solved solved solved solved bonate Unity solved solved solved nini-mangan- cal- mag- sodium potas- (HCO,) as sul- chlor- fluor- trate triteese cium nesium (Na) si urn CaCOs fate ide ide (N) (N) (Mn) (Ca) (Mn) (K) (S0a ) (CD (F)

0.00 12 2.0 3.1 1.0 37 30 4.9 2.B 0.0

.08 18 9.0 6.3 2.0 106 87 5.2 2.4 .1

8.0 - 4.5 0.046.5 6.2 .104.0 3.7 .08

.01 8.0 3.7 5.9 2.4 24 20 11 5.2 .0

.01 11 4.2 5.3 .8 23 19 8.2 4.2 .0

8.56.5

1 Source of data: C, Snohomish County Health Dept.; G, U.S. Geological Survey; S, Washington State Dept.of Social and Health Services.2 SP, spring.3 All unitless values under remarks are in milligrams per liter.

152


Nitro gen,total(N)

0.38

__

.00 _

~

--

-

_

_-- __ _-- -- --

_-- -- 2.7

_

_

_.

--

_

6.4

_«

_« «

Total Dis- phos- sol vedphorus solids(P) (residue

at 1800C)

67

__

129 _ ._ __

--

-

_

_.. -. -.

905645

_-.

_-_ ..

78

_

_

-.--

--

_-_

104

__

_ __._

Hard- Non- Sodium Specific ness car- adsorp- conduc-(Ca, bonate tion tanceMg) hard- ratio (micro-

ness mhos)

38 8 0.2 86

_189

82 0 .3 186226197191199200190200207198

:: :: :: ::._

..__ __. ._ ._

_.- .-35 16 .4 110

_

_

._

--

__

140

45 26 .3 128

_._

_._

236157165

pH Water (units) temper

ature(°C)

7.1 7.5

8.6 8.3 9.5

9.69.8

10.1

10.010.2

-_ --

7.57.88.5

9.5

8.08.5

9.59.59.4

10.48.69.59.0

9.59.5

9.09.09.5

10.510.0

6.7 8.5

9.08.9

8.59.5

8.99.0

9.4

9.59.0

7.8 7.5

7.1 8.0

7.09.08.1

10.68.5

_ 7.2

Color (platinum-cobaltunits)

5

_ 3 _ _. -.

--

-

-

_

_-- _.-. 555__- --

_-- --0

_

_

_

-

___--

3

_--

_--_----

Tur- Total bidity col i form(JTU) (col. per

100 mL)

80

II <] ____ .- ~

II II9

..

_

_

<1..

1

800001

58no10

160140

___

<1<1

_<1

__

5--

..

-el_

--

_.-

<1

_.._._

RemarksS

125 col /1 00 mL unidentified bacteria. -- ..

II

>2,000 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.

-

-

_6.2 mg/L total iron.

_17 mg/L total iron.

;>2,000 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.

>2,000 col /1 00 mL unidentified bacteria. -- _.Well disinfected on 8/9/74.Well disinfected on 9/1/74.Sample taken at 7:30.Sample taken at 10:00. 4.8 mg/L total iron.

_-- 320 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.~

__42 col /1 00 mL unidentified bacteria.

_--

^2,000 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.

--

__C1(fie1d)=19 mg/L.

~

_0.35 mg/L total iron.150 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.

_--_Reported gas odor in summer.C1(field)=14 mg/L.

8.9 >2,000 col/100 mL unidentified bacteria.

153

united states department of the interior water resources of the tulalip indian reservation… ·...

Documents