university of milano comparative politics 2013 paulina przybylska
DESCRIPTION
UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska. WHAT IS FREEDOM HOUSE?. Freedom House is a Washington-based non-governmental organisation established in 1941 to promote democracy around the globe Assesses democracy in 193 countries by examining the availability of - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
UNIVERSITY OF MILANOCOMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013
Paulina Przybylska
![Page 2: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Freedom House is a Washington-based non-governmental organisation established in 1941 to promote democracy around the globeAssesses democracy in 193 countries by
examining the availability of Political rightscivil liberties
Uses reports, assessments by scholars & experts to rate each country on a 7 point scale: 1 is high…………......7 is low
WHAT IS FREEDOM HOUSE?
![Page 3: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Support to the expansion of freedom in the world
Freedom House is a catalyst for freedom, democracy, and the rule of law
Supports democratic change, monitors freedom, and advocates for democracy and human rights.
Aid to political science research
WHAT’S THE AIM?
![Page 4: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Freedom House measures freedom according to two broad categories:
1.Political rights - enable people to participate freely in the political
process through the right to vote, compete for public office and elect representatives who have a decisive impact on public policies and are accountable to the electorate.
2. Civil liberties allow for:- the freedoms of expression and belief,- associational and organizational rights- rule of law, and personal autonomy without
interference from the state
What is Freedom House’s definition of “freedom”?
![Page 5: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Map of Freedom in the World:focuses on …
countries
territories (e.g., Palestinian Authority-Administered Territories or Nagorno-Karabakh).
![Page 6: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Since 1972 Freedom House publishes an annual report, Freedom in the World, on the degree of democratic freedoms according to civil and political rights on a scale from 1 (most free) to 7 (least free).
1.0 to 2.5 considered "free".
States with values from 3.0 to 5.0 were considered "partly free"
and those with values between 5.5 and 7.0 as "not free".
![Page 7: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
THREE BROAD CATEGORY DESIGNATIONS:1. FREE:- open political competition- a climate of respect for civil liberties- significant independent civic life independent media2. PARTLY FREE:- Limited respect for political rights and civil liberties- Enviroment of corruption- Weak rule of law- Ethnic and religious strife- Single party enjoys dominance despite a certain
degree of pluralism
![Page 8: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3. NOT FREE:- Basic political rights are absent- Basic civil liberties are widely and
systematically denied
![Page 9: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Scores for cases
Freedom House scale from 1 till 7
South Africa Zimbabwe
Argentina, India North Korea
See: www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=22&year=2007
1.0-2.5= free 3.0 - 5.0 = partly free 5.5- 7.0 = not free
![Page 10: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
NOT FREE WITH THE LOWEST RATING 7:-NORTH KOREA-TURKMENISTAN-UZBEKISTAN-SUDAN-GUINEA-ERITREA-SAUDI ARABIA-SYRIA-SOMALIA-TIBET-WESTERN SAHARA
SLIGHTY ABOVE 7:-BELARUS-CHAD-CHINA-CUBA-LAOS-SOUTH OSSETIA
WORST OF THE WORST:
![Page 12: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SIGNATURE REPORTS OF FREEDOM HOUSE:
1.Freedom in the World
2. Freedom on the Net
3. Freedom of the Press
4. Nations in Transit - study of reform in the former Communist states of
Europe and Eurasia
5. Countries at the Crossroads - countries that are at a critical crossroads in determining
their political future (ex. Egypt, Tunisia)
6. Women's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa
![Page 13: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Nations are scored from 0 to 4 on several questions and the sum determines the rankings, ex:
1. Is the head of state and/or head of government or other chief authority elected through free and fair elections?
2. Is there an independent judiciary?3. Are there free trade unions?4. Is there effective collective bargaining?
![Page 14: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1. Freedom in the world:
![Page 15: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
AZERBAIJAN NOT FREE6 5
BULGARIA* FREE 2 2
GERMANY* FREE 1 1
GREECE* FREE 2 2
HUNGARY* FREE 1 2
ITALY* FREE 1
VENEZUELA PARTLY FREE
5 5
![Page 16: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Index for: Italy, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Venezuela, Azerbeijan
1. DeclinesItaly: political rights ratings declined from 1
to 2 due to continued, widespread grand and petty corruption, especially in the south.
2. Trends arrows downGreece: received a downward trend arrow
due to a significant upsure in right-wing violence, led by Golden Dawn party, against immigrant groups, their supporters, and the political left, as well as the lack of effective police protection from this violence
![Page 17: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
4. Nations in transition
![Page 18: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
NATIONS IN TRANSIT countries on the borderline of democracy:
AZERBEIJAN: CONSOLIDADED AUTHORITARIAN REGIME(closed societies in which dictators prevent political competition and pluralism and are responsible for widespread violations of basic political, civil, and human rights)
BULGARIA: SEMI-CONSOLIDADED DEMOCRACY(electoral democracies that meet relatively high standards for the selection of national leaders but exhibit some weaknesses in their defense of political rights and civil liberties)
HUNGARY: CONSOLIDADED DEMOCRACY
![Page 19: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: UNIVERSITY OF MILANO COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2013 Paulina Przybylska](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062811/5681605b550346895dcf8629/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Criticisms about Freedom House:Various sources of “bias”
issues with aggregation (different scores, same category)
inadequate level of transparency and replicability of the scales
ideological biases scores for leftist governments are influenced by political considerations (negative conception of freedom); changes in scores are sometimes driven by changes in the criteria rather than changes in real conditions
promoting U.S. government interests abroad