upper lachlan groundwater flow model · 2018. 4. 23. · figure 2-5 residual mass curve of rainfall...
TRANSCRIPT
Leading policy and reform in sustainable water management
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Publisher
NSW Department of Primary Industries, Office of Water.
Level 18, 227 Elizabeth Street GPO Box 3889 Sydney NSW 2001
T 02 8281 7777 F 02 8281 7799
www.water.nsw.gov.au
The NSW Office of Water manages the policy and regulatory frameworks for the state’s surface water and groundwater resources, to provide a secure and sustainable water supply for all users. It also supports water utilities in the provision of water and sewerage services throughout New South Wales.
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
February 2012
ISBN 978 0 7313 3503 9
This publication may be cited as:
Bilge, H., (2012), Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model, NSW Office of Water, Sydney
© State of New South Wales through the Department of Trade and Investment, Regional Infrastructure and Services, 2012
This material may be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, providing the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are clearly and correctly acknowledged.
Disclaimer: While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document.
NOW 11_281
Funding for this project has been provided by a National Water Commission grant to the NSW Office of Water under the Raising National Water Standards Program
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Contents
Abstract.................................................................................................................................................. iv
1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Description of the model area ....................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Rainfall and evaporation ..................................................................................................... 4
2.1.1 Rainfall .................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.2 Evaporation............................................................................................................. 8
2.2 Geology............................................................................................................................... 8
2.3 Hydrogeology ...................................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Surface water .................................................................................................................... 11
2.5 Groundwater usage .......................................................................................................... 12
3. Model development ..................................................................................................................... 14
3.1 Conceptual model ............................................................................................................. 14
3.2 Model discretisation .......................................................................................................... 16
3.3 Initial heads ....................................................................................................................... 18
3.4 Aquifer parameters............................................................................................................ 18
3.5 Boundary conditions ......................................................................................................... 20
3.6 Well package..................................................................................................................... 20
3.7 Recharge........................................................................................................................... 21
3.7.1 Rainfall Recharge ................................................................................................. 21
3.7.2 Irrigation Recharge ............................................................................................... 22
3.7.3 Flood Recharge .................................................................................................... 23
3.8 River aquifer interaction .................................................................................................... 25
3.9 Evaporation ....................................................................................................................... 28
3.10 Solver 28
4. Model calibration ......................................................................................................................... 29
4.1 Automatic calibration......................................................................................................... 29
4.2 Final estimates of aquifer parameters .............................................................................. 31
4.3 Head response.................................................................................................................. 39
4.4 Calibration assesment ...................................................................................................... 39
4.5 Sensitivity analysis............................................................................................................ 44
4.6 Water balance................................................................................................................... 46
5. Scenario runs .............................................................................................................................. 48
5.1 Scenario water balance .................................................................................................... 48
i| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
6. Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................................ 56
7. References .................................................................................................................................. 58
APPENDIX 1: Model geometry ........................................................................................................... 59
APPENDIX 2: Initial head .................................................................................................................. 63
APPENDIX 3: Production bore locations............................................................................................. 66
Table List of Usage Bores ................................................................................................................ 66
APPENDIX 4: River details.................................................................................................................. 67
APPENDIX 5: Monitoring bore locations and model layer boundaries ............................................... 69
APPENDIX 6: Observed and simulated water level hydrographs....................................................... 72
Tables
Table 3-1 Model Grid Specifications ............................................................................................... 16
Table 3-2 Model Time-Discretisation Parameters........................................................................... 16
Table 3-3 Parameter settings in GMG solver package ................................................................... 28
Table 4-1 Model Parameters........................................................................................................... 30
Table 4-2 Calibrated Model Parameters. ........................................................................................ 38
Figures
Figure 2-1 Location of the Upper Lachlan Valley .................................................................................. 3
Figure 2-2 Rainfall stations and contours of average annual rainfall (1986-2008) in the model area .. 4
Figure 2-3 Average monthly Rainfall (mm) registered by eight Meteorological Stations in the model area .................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 2-4 Residual Mass Curve of Rainfall for the period in the model area1889-2007 ..................... 6
Figure 2-5 Residual Mass Curve of Rainfall (65016) against water levels in monitoring bores of 36064_1, 36085_1, 36086_1, 36552_1 and 26554_1.................................................. 7
Figure 2-6 Monthly average evaporation data between 1986 and 2008............................................... 8
Figure 2-7 Location of model cross-sections................................................................................... 9
Figure 2-8 Cross section of the model area ........................................................................................ 10
Figure 2-9 The rivers and creeks in the model area ........................................................................... 11
Figure 2-10 Groundwater usage pattern for each water year in the Upper Lachlan GWMA (1986-2008)..................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 2-11 Groundwater usage bores in the model area .................................................................. 13
Figure 3-1 Conceptual Model .............................................................................................................. 15
Figure 3-2 Conceptual Model – Plan View.......................................................................................... 15
Figure 3-3 Grid details ......................................................................................................................... 17
ii| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 3-4 Definition of Vertical Leakance Parameter (VCONT) (from Chiang & Kinzelbach, 1996) . 19
Figure 3-5 Assumed monthly pumping and irrigation schedule ....................................................... 20
Figure 3-6 Rainfall Recharge & Evaporation Distribution................................................................. 21
Figure 3-7 Irrigation recharge areas.................................................................................................... 22
Figure 3-8 Assumed yearly irrigation recharge rates .......................................................................... 23
Figure 3-9 Flood recharge areas......................................................................................................... 24
Figure 3-10 MODFLOW conceptualisation of river/aquifer interaction ............................................... 26
Figure 3-11 Schematic diagram of the river sections and gauging stations ....................................... 27
Figure 4-1 Location of pilot points in the Lower Cowra Formation...................................................... 31
Figure 4-2 Hydraulic Conductivity (m/d) distributions in Upper Cowra (Layer 1) ................................ 33
Figure 4-3 Hydraulic Conductivity (m/d) distributions in Lower Cowra (Layer 2) ............................... 33
Figure 4-4 Hydraulic Conductivity (m/d) distributions in Lachlan Formation....................................... 34
Figure 4-5 Specific yield distributions in Upper Cowra........................................................................ 34
Figure 4-6 Storage Coefficient in Lower Cowra .................................................................................. 35
Figure 4-7 Storage Coefficient in Lachlan Formation......................................................................... 35
Figure 4-8 Vertical Leakance (1/d) between Upper and Lower Cowra ............................................... 36
Figure 4-9 Leakance (1/d) between Lower Cowra and Lachlan Formation ........................................ 36
Figure 4-10 Calibrated River Conductance in m2/d/km. ..................................................................... 37
Figure 4-11 Layer 1 Scattergram of modelled versus measured heads and statistics results. ......... 40
Figure 4-12 Layer 2 Scattergram of modelled versus measured heads and statistics results. ......... 41
Figure 4-13 Layer 3 Scattergram of modelled versus measured heads and statistics results. ......... 42
Figure 4-14 All Layers calibration assessment: scattergram of modelled versus measured heads, statistics and distribution of residuals results...................................................... 43
Figure 4-15 Adjustable Model Parameter Sensitivities ...................................................................... 45
Figure 4-16 Model Water Balance Summary for July 1986 to June 2008 ......................................... 46
Figure 4-17 Average Annual water balance for individual layers for July 1986 to June 2008 .......... 47
Figure 5-1 Average Annual water balance over dry scenario run June 2008 to July 2108 ................ 50
Figure 5-2 Average Annual water balance over medium scenario run June 2008 to July 2108......... 51
Figure 5-3 Average Annual water balance over wet scenario run June 2008 to July 2108............... 52
Figure 5-4 Dry Scenario yearly groundwater extractions over the 100 year simulation .................... 53
Figure 5-5 Med Scenario yearly groundwater extractions over the 100 year simulation .................... 53
Figure 5-6 Wet Scenario yearly groundwater extractions over the 100 year simulation.................... 54
Figure 5-7 Dry Scenario yearly net river leakage over the 100 year simulation ................................. 54
Figure 5-8 Mid Scenario yearly net river leakage over the 100 year simulation ................................. 55
Figure 5-9 Wet Scenario yearly net river leakage over the 100 year simulation................................. 55
iii| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
iv| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Abstract The model area is located in the central west of New South Wales. It comprises alluvial deposits
along the Lachlan River from 20 km upstream of Cowra to Lake Cargelligo. The alluvium is commonly known as the Upper Lachlan groundwater source, (designated GWMA 011) for management purposes.
Most of the early groundwater extraction in the Upper Lachlan alluvium was limited to stock and domestic use and town water supply and most irrigation needs were met by surface water. With the reduction in river water supply for irrigation, the potential of groundwater in the Upper Lachlan as an
alternative resource was recognised in the mid 1990s to late.
A groundwater flow model was developed for the Upper Lachlan alluvial aquifers to assist the community and resource managers to develop long term strategies to ensure environmentally
responsible and economically sustainable use of this valuable natural resource.
The alluvial unconsolidated sediment sequence consists of two formations which are the Cowra and Lachlan Formation. Conceptually, for the purpose of this groundwater flow model the groundwater
system is defined in terms of four layers;
Layer 1- Upper Cowra
Layer 2- Lower Cowra
Layer 3- Lachlan
Layer 4 Fractured Rock (inactive).
An inactive fourth layer has been included in the model to account for the fractured rock aquifer which
is in direct contact with the overlying sediments. In time, this layer may be activated if there is evidence to suggest any significant interaction between the alluvial and fractured rock aquifers should this prove to be a significant of water.
The model calibration period is from July 1986 to June 2008. Recharge components to the aquifers are from rainfall, rivers, flood and irrigation. Discharge is predominantly through evapotranspiration, groundwater extraction and river leakage. Groundwater outflow occurs across the western boundary
and there is no inflow from any of the boundaries. The direction of regional groundwater movement is generally from east to west.
Non linear parameter estimation (PEST) was used to aid calibration of the model based on observed
water levels from NOW monitoring bores. Based on comparison between observed and simulated groundwater levels for the entire calibration period, the model achieved a good match with measured data in general with the exception of Zone 7. Low SRMS (scaled root mean square) values (less than
5%) were achieved for all three layers - confirming that the model is well calibrated overall. Poor calibration of bores in Zone 7 is attributed to the lack of shallow water table monitoring bores in the area.
The annual average total recharge is 186.48 GL from all recharge sources in the calibration period. The average rainfall recharge is about 59% of the total recharge. The total annual average discharge is 156.30 GL. The evapotranspiration is about 76% of this total while groundwater extraction makes up
11%. Evaporation is the dominant component of outflow over the calibration period.
“Dry”, “medium” and “wet” climate scenarios were formulated to examine the aquifer behaviour under “no pumping”, “current development” and “full entitlements” conditions. These scenarios showed that if
there was no pumping in the region, water level would rise causing river leakage to decrease and evapotranspiration to increase. If there were high pumping, water levels would have declined causing evapotranspiration to decrease and river leakage to increase.
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
1. Introduction
The Upper Lachlan Valley is located in central western New South Wales. For groundwater
management purposes this area is referred to as Groundwater Management Area (GWMA) 011. The area stretches from Lake Cargelligo in the west to 20 km east of Cowra. The groundwater system provides water for stock and domestic, irrigation, town water supply and industry in the region.
Within the Upper Lachlan Valley groundwater source there are two geological formations, which are the deeper Lachlan Formation and the shallower Cowra Formation. The Cowra Formation has separated into two distinct aquifers; layer 1- the shallower unconfined water table Upper Cowra aquifer
and layer 2- deeper semi confined to confined Lower Cowra aquifer. Layer 3- the Lachlan Formation which has a maximum thickness of around 90 m. The Cowra Formation is generally 30-50 m thick in most areas. However, it can reach greater depths up to about 110 m in the south.
The GWMA 011 is embargoed for new groundwater entitlements. The current total entitlement is 184,575 ML/y. Groundwater extraction has risen in recent years from 18,700 ML in 2001/2002 to 84,600 ML in 2007/2008.
Conceptually, the groundwater system is divided into four major regional aquifers: an upper Cowra, a lower Cowra, a deeper Lachlan and fractured rock. There is no hydrogeological distinction between the Upper and Lower Cowra formation layers included in the model. For modelling purposes, an
arbitrary thickness of Upper Cowra 20 m maximum in the centre of the valley was assumed. Fractured rock layer is an inactive layer.
Recharge mechanisms to the aquifer include rainfall recharge, river leakage, flood recharge and
irrigation recharge. Discharges from the system are through evapotranspiration and groundwater pumping from all aquifers. The aquifer system receives no lateral flow through boundaries in the north, south and east. Groundwater flow out of the system is westward into the Lower Lachlan valley.
Regional flow is from east to west.
A modular groundwater flow model (MODFLOW), using a non-uniform finite difference grid, was adopted for this study. Square cell dimensions vary from 500 m in the vicinity of the Lachlan River,
and increase progressively to 2000 m away from the river to the north and south. The model grid is rotated 20 degrees anti clockwise. Grid size and rotation were selected to ensure an acceptable degree of detail along the river tract to provide better understanding of stream-aquifer interaction. The
area covers approximately 50,960 km2. The starting and ending model calibration period are July 1986 and June 2008 respectively. These dates were selected to include drought and flood conditions in the calibration simulation.
The groundwater flow model for the Upper Lachlan Valley was developed to:
Aid understanding of the flow system
Identify key recharge sources and quantify the contribution from each source
Identify parts of the aquifer under stress
Identify parts of the aquifer with development potential
Aid assessment of the impact of groundwater development on river flow
Aid understanding of the processes of river/aquifer water interchange
Estimate recharge to the groundwater system
Evaluate the impact of climate change on groundwater availability.
This report outlines the hydrogeology of the model area and development of the groundwater flow model.
1| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
2| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
2. Description of the model area
The extent of the Upper Lachlan Valley groundwater model area is shown in Figure 2-1. The model
extent is defined by AMG coordinates 408000-666000 m E and 6160000-6370000 m N.
The major water courses in the study area includes the Lachlan River which flows from east to west, the lower end of the Belubula River and Mandagery Creek in the north-east, the lower end of Goobank
Creek in the north and Crowther Creek in the south-east. Cowra, Forbes and Parkes are the main urban settlements located in the model area. Other towns in the area include Canowindra, Condobolin and West Wyalong.
The Newell Highway runs in the north-south direction in the central part of the model area.
The GWMA 011 has an area of 13087 km2 and for management purposes the area is divided into eight zones:
Zone 1 - Back Creek Cowra,
Zone 2 - North of the Western Hwy Cowra to Gooloogong,
Zone 3 - Gooloogong to Jemalong Gap,
Zone 4 - Mandagery Creek,
Zone 5 - Jemalong Gap to Condobolin,
Zone 6 - South of the Western Hwy Cowra,
Zone 7 - Bland Creek System
Zone 8 - Condobolin to Lake Cargelligo
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 2-1 Location of the Upper Lachlan Valley
3| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
2.1 Rainfall and evaporation
2.1.1 Rainfall
Daily rainfall in the study area has been recorded at a number of weather stations at variable intervals. Rainfall records from eight stations monitored by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology were examined
for the purpose of model construction. These stations (65091, 73014, 65016, 65026, 73037, 50044, 50014 and 75039) are shown in Figure 2-2 together with contours of average annual rainfall for the period 1986-2008.
Figure 2-2 Rainfall stations and contours of average annual rainfall (1986-2008) in the model area
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo#65016
#65026
#65091#73014
#50014
#50044
#73037
#75039
Rainfall in the Upper Lachlan Valley generally decreases with decreasing elevation towards the west. Contours of mean annual rainfall in Figure 2-2 show the high rainfall contour (620 mm/year) lies along the eastern margins of the basin. Average annual rainfall, for the same period, ranges from 421 mm at
Lake Cargelligo to 619 mm at Grenfell, a difference of 198 mm a year over a distance of 258 km.
4| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
The average monthly rainfall for the study area is given in Figure 2.3 Over 35 percent of the annual rainfall at Forbes occurs between June and September. July with average rainfalls of approximately 47 mm is the wettest months. March and May are the driest months with the average rainfall around
37 mm respectively.
Figure 2-3 Average monthly Rainfall (mm) registered by eight Meteorological Stations in the model area
Average Monthly Rainfall
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Months
Ave
rag
e R
ain
fall
mm
Cowra
Grenfell
Forbes
Parkes
Temora
West Wyalong
Condobolin
LakeCargelligo
The cumulative residual-mass curve in Figure 2-4 provides a good visual representation of the rainfall history. The residual mass curve is calculated by subtracting the mean monthly rainfall for a given month from the recorded rainfall for the same month, and adding the difference to a rolling sum. A
falling trend indicates a period of lower than average rainfall, whereas the reverse is true for rising trends. From 1908 to 1946, the rainfall was below average; and this is considered a dry period. From early 1947 to early 1965, the annual rainfall increased markedly to a record high. Between 1965 and
1968 shows a drop in average rainfall and a rise during the next ten years which indicates higher than average rainfall.
Changes in the residual mass curve can be compared with changes in bore water levels to examine
links between long-term rainfall trends and fluctuations of groundwater level. Figure 2-5 demonstrates that there is a strong relationship between the rainfall residual mass curve and fluctuations of water table in the model area.
Summer mean maximum temperatures are greater than 30oC in most areas. In winter, minimum temperatures of less than 3oC are common.
5| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 2-4 Residual Mass Curve of Rainfall for the period in the model area1889-2007
Residual Mass Curve
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
1000
2000
01/0
1/18
89
01/0
1/18
92
01/0
1/18
95
01/0
1/18
98
01/0
1/19
01
01/0
1/19
04
01/0
1/19
07
01/0
1/19
10
01/0
1/19
13
01/0
1/19
16
01/0
1/19
19
01/0
1/19
22
01/0
1/19
25
01/0
1/19
28
01/0
1/19
31
01/0
1/19
34
01/0
1/19
37
01/0
1/19
40
01/0
1/19
43
01/0
1/19
46
01/0
1/19
49
01/0
1/19
52
01/0
1/19
55
01/0
1/19
58
01/0
1/19
61
01/0
1/19
64
01/0
1/19
67
01/0
1/19
70
01/0
1/19
73
01/0
1/19
76
01/0
1/19
79
01/0
1/19
82
01/0
1/19
85
01/0
1/19
88
01/0
1/19
91
01/0
1/19
94
01/0
1/19
97
01/0
1/20
00
01/0
1/20
03
01/0
1/20
06
Date
Cu
mm
ula
tiv
e R
es
idu
al m
as
s (
mm
)
Cowra
Grenfell
Forbes
Parkes
Temora
West Wyalong
Condobolin
Lake Cargelligo
6| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
36084, 36085, 36086, 36552 &36554 v FORBES 65016 Station
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
08/0
3/19
71
20/0
7/19
72
02/1
2/19
73
16/0
4/19
75
28/0
8/19
76
10/0
1/19
78
25/0
5/19
79
06/1
0/19
80
18/0
2/19
82
03/0
7/19
83
14/1
1/19
84
29/0
3/19
86
11/0
8/19
87
23/1
2/19
88
07/0
5/19
90
19/0
9/19
91
31/0
1/19
93
15/0
6/19
94
28/1
0/19
95
11/0
3/19
97
24/0
7/19
98
06/1
2/19
99
19/0
4/20
01
01/0
9/20
02
14/0
1/20
04
28/0
5/20
05
10/1
0/20
06
22/0
2/20
08
06/0
7/20
09
Date
Cu
mm
ula
tive
Res
idu
al M
ass
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
WL
Dep
th
Forbes_65016
GW036084_1
GW036085_1
GW036086_1
GW036552_1
GW036554_1
Figure 2-5 Residual Mass Curve of Rainfall (65016) against water levels in monitoring bores of 36064_1, 36085_1, 36086_1, 36552_1 and 26554_1
7| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
2.1.2 Evaporation
The weather stations providing rainfall data for the model also provided evaporation data. The average monthly evaporation data for these stations are shown in Figure 2-6. The average annual evaporation is between from 1534 to 2014mm (1986-2008). Highest monthly evaporation occurs in December and
January in response to high the summer temperatures. Lowest monthly evaporation occurs in June and July.
Figure 2-6 Monthly average evaporation data between 1986 and 2008
Monthly Evaporation
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Months
mm
Cowra
Grenfell
Forbes
Parkes
Temora
Westwyalong
Condobolin
LakeCargelligo
2.2 Geology
The regional geology of the area has been studied by Gates and Williams (1988), Bish and Gates (1991) and Muller and Lennox (1999). The following description is reproduced from the latter
reference.
“It can be seen that much of the central part of the area is covered by unconsolidated alluvial and colluvial sediments. With the exception of some coarse-grained Jurassic sediment in the north and
the Carboniferous granites to the east, most rock types were formed prior to the Carboniferous period (354 million years ago). Ordovician metasediments are extensive throughout the area as are Silurian-Devonian granites and granodiorites. Volcanic rocks are extensive in the east and in
many cases are comagmatic with adjacent plutonic rocks. These igneous rocks have been major source of material for the sedimentary rocks of the region. Depositional environment for sedimentary rocks would have been dominantly marine or marginal for rocks of early Devonian
age or older. Transitional and freshwater environments existed after this time. Structurally, the area is quite complex with several orogenic episodes deforming and displacing the strata between the Ordovician and Carboniferous periods. This activity was associated with the formation of the
Lachlan Fold Belt. After this time, conditions in the study area stabilised and erosional processes dominated until the advent of the Cainozoic, when both erosional and depositional processes formed the present day landscapes”.
8| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
2.3 Hydrogeology
The alluvial unconsolidated sediment sequence is divided into two major aquifer formations, the Cowra Formation and the deeper Lachlan Formation. The Cowra Formation unconformably overlies
the Lachlan Formation and basement rocks. It is generally 30-50 m thick in most areas. However it can reach greater thickness - up to about 110 m - in Zone 7. It consists mainly of clay with interbedded moderately sorted sand and gravel. The Cowra Formation is divided into two aquifers in
the model area, the Upper Cowra unconfined water table aquifer and the Lower Cowra semi confined to unconfined aquifer. The Lachlan Formation occurs in the deep incised palaeo channel of the Lachlan River and the maximum thickness is around 90 m. This Formation consists of subrounded to
rounded, grey to off white sand and gravel with larger amounts of interbedded brown to yellow to grey clay. Representative cross sections for lines depicted in Figure 2-7 are presented in Figure 2-8. The fractured rock (layer 4) shown with a minimal thickness that does not represent reality.
The water quality in the Cowra formation deteriorates with distance from the Lachlan River and its tributaries as discussed by O’Rourke (2007)
Figure 2-7 Location of model cross-sections
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
9| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 2-8 Cross section of the model area
10| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
2.4 Surface water
The Lachlan River is one of the major recharge sources in the Upper Lachlan GWMA. The Lachlan River directly overlies the alluvial aquifers. Interaction between the Lachlan River and the aquifer
system is known to have an important influence on groundwater levels within the model area. The Lachlan and Belubula Rivers are regulated from water stored in Wyangala and Carcoar Dams respectively. Minor unregulated tributaries include Back Creek, Mandagery Creek, Island Creek,
Ulgutherie Creek and Goobank Creek in the study area. The Lachlan River and its branches in GWMA 011 are shown in Figure 2.9.
Figure 2-9 The rivers and creeks in the model area
380000 400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 540000 560000 580000 600000 620000 640000 660000 680000
6120000
6140000
6160000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
6380000
6400000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
11| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
2.5 Groundwater usage
Groundwater from the alluvium of the Upper Lachlan Valley is used extensively for irrigation, town and rural community water supplies and stock and domestic requirements. Most high yield bores are used
for irrigation and town water supply. The volume of groundwater extraction from the Upper Lachlan GWMA for the water years 1986–2008 is shown in Figure 2-10.
Figure 2-10 Groundwater usage pattern for each water year in the Upper Lachlan GWMA (1986-2008)
Yearly GW Usage Volume
1078
1349
1035
1167
1822
1465
461
473 36
37
4194
4088
5641
7595
9747 1247
1
1876
1
4539
5
5143
9
6580
3
5705
9
8461
7
7648
9
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
1986
-87
1987
-88
1988
-89
1889
-90
1990
-91
1991
-92
1992
-93
1993
-94
1994
-95
1995
-96
1996
-97
1997
-98
1998
-99
1999
-00
2000
-01
2001
-02
2002
-03
2003
-04
2004
-05
2005
-06
2006
-07
2007
-08
Water Year
ML
There is little available data for usage prior to 1998. However this has little impact on the model development since data are available for the major part of the calibration period (July 1986 to June
2008). Reliable metered groundwater usage data are available in NOW databases from 1998/1999 to the present. There has been a considerable increase in groundwater usage volumes and the area irrigated by groundwater since 1994 since the implementation of the Murray Basin surface water cap.
As a consequence of this measure, groundwater use partially replaced the use of surface water. The locations of the currently 388 active groundwater pumping wells are presented in Figure 2-11.
12| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 2-11 Groundwater usage bores in the model area
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
13| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
3. Model development
A numerical groundwater model is a computer-based mathematical representation of a natural
hydrogeological system that is based on a conceptual model of that system. The mathematical model is a set of equations which, subject to certain assumptions and boundary conditions, describes the essential physical features and processes of the groundwater system. The set of equations is solved
using numerical methods (e.g. finite differences).
The numerical model is developed with MODFLOW 2000 finite difference software (McDonald & Harbaugh, 1988), using the Groundwater VistasTM (Version 5.41) graphical user interface in a
Windows environment.
Nine MODFLOW packages are used in this model:
Basic (BAS) package,
Block Centred Flow (BCF) package,
Discretization (DIS) package
Constant Head Boundary (CHD) package,
Recharge (RCH) package,
Well (WEL) package,
Evapotranspiration (EVT) package
River (RIV) package,
Pre-conditioned Conjugate Gradient (GMG) package.
This chapter describes the data analysis and processing required to develop the model under the
MODFLOW framework.
3.1 Conceptual model
A conceptual model is a simplified presentation of the groundwater flow system including major hydrostratigraphic units and boundary conditions. Such a conceptual model for the Upper Lachlan groundwater model is illustrated in Figure 3-1.
Conceptually, the groundwater system is defined in terms of four layers, designated Upper Cowra, Lower Cowra, Lachlan and fractured rock.
The Upper Cowra (layer 1) in the upper alluvium is an unconfined aquifer and its thickness has a fixed
maximum value of 20 m if the total thickness of the Cowra (Upper and Lower) Formation exceeds 40 m. The Lower Cowra (layer 2) in the lower alluvium of the Cowra Formation is an unconfined/confined aquifer. The Lachlan Formation aquifer (layer 3) in the deep alluvium is also
conceptualised as unconfined /confined. Layer 4 is an inactive fractured rock layer included in the model to facilitate future modifications should data become available to indicate hydraulic connection with the overlying alluvial aquifers.
The system is assumed to be enclosed by impermeable basement.
The western boundary is a flow boundary where either groundwater potential or flow-rates can be prescribed as a function of time and position. Significant fluxes of groundwater across this boundary
(shown in Figure 3-2) are expected due to connectivity with adjoining aquifers. The boundaries to the east, north and south are treated as no-flow boundaries
The major recharge sources of the aquifers are identified as rainfall, irrigation, floods and the river
system comprising the Lachlan River, Belubula River, Mandagery Creek, Goobank Creek, Back Creek, Island Creek and Ulgutherie Creek. Discharge from the aquifer is mainly due to evapotranspiration, groundwater extraction and outflow through the western boundary.
14| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 3-1 Conceptual Model
Figure 3-2 Conceptual Model – Plan View
400000 450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6150000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
6400000
15| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
16| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
3.2 Model discretisation
Use of MODFLOW software requires discretisation of the model spatially as well as temporally. Spatial discretisation is achieved by specifying an orthogonal set of rows and columns to form a mesh over
the model area. While a regular mesh with uniform row and column widths yields the most accurate form of the finite difference solution, often it becomes necessary to refine the mesh in key areas of interest. In the current grid, row widths are appropriately sized to ensure an acceptable degree of
detail along the river tract to provide a better understanding of stream-aquifer interaction. In order to produce a numerically efficient model, the grid is rotated 20 degrees anticlockwise (Figure 3-3) relative to the Australian Map Grid (AMG) to minimise its overall size. The grid cells falling outside the model
boundaries and outcrop areas are designated as inactive. Data pertaining to the model grid are summarised in Table 3-1.
The model calibration period is from July 1986 to June 2008. According to the rainfall residual mass
curves presented in Chapter 2 (Figure 2-4), this start date appears to be within a period of relatively stable climatic conditions. In addition, over this period, a significant set of observed water level data are available within the model area, for meaningful comparison with corresponding model predictions.
Transient simulation of a MODFLOW numerical model needs the calibration period to be discretised into several stress periods. Stress periods are periods within which the various model stresses are assumed to remain constant and for which data are available or can reasonably be inferred. The
model computes the groundwater elevation at the centre of each active grid cell in the model space, at each stress period during simulation. MODFLOW's approach to solving the mathematics of groundwater flow also requires that stress periods be further discretised into a number of time steps
using a suitable time step multiplier. Time discretisation parameters are summarised in Table 3-2.
Table 3-1 Model Grid Specifications
South-west corner easting, northing: 378 000, 6 237 000m AMG
Angle of rotation relative to AMG: 20 degrees (anticlockwise)
No. of layers 4
No. of columns: 535
No. of rows: 192
Column width 500 m
Row width (varied) 500 - 2000 m
Total Cells (active + inactive): 410880
Table 3-2 Model Time-Discretisation Parameters
Stress period length: 1 month (30.44 days)
No. of stress periods: 264
No. of Time steps 10 (in each stress period)
Time step multiplier 1.2
Start of calibration period: July 1986
End of calibration period: June, 2008
Calibration period length: 22 years
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 3-3 Grid details
20 deg
17| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
The following five surface elevation data sets are required to be specified in m AHD, for each active cell in the current model to define aquifer geometry.
Natural surface (which is also the top of the Upper Cowra Formation)
Bottom of Upper Cowra Formation (which is also the top of the Lower Cowra Formation)
Bottom of Lower Cowra Formation (which is also the top of the Lachlan Formation)
Bottom of Lachlan Formation (which is the hydraulic basement as well as the top of the Fractured Rock) while layer 4 is inactive
Hydraulic basement bed surface (which is also the bottom of the fractured rock)
Topographic DEM data were used to define the natural surface elevation of the model. Data for the
elevations of the four remaining surfaces were obtained from several sources which included Murray Basin Hydrogeological Map Series CARGELLIGO scale 1:250 000, Barnett (2008), SKM Upper Lachlan Groundwater Model Calibration Report and Coffey Geosciences Pty Ltd Cowal Gold Mine
Groundwater supply modelling study (2006). SurferTM software was used to create all five layer elevations using available data before importing into the model. Contour maps showing the three model layer thicknesses are presented in Appendix 1.
3.3 Initial heads
The MODFLOW numerical model requires the specification of head for every active cell in each layer
at the start of the calibration period. Transient models require initial conditions closely matching natural conditions at the start of the simulation. The initial conditions are the heads from which the model estimates the changes in the system due to the stresses applied. Therefore, any errors
associated with assumptions made to obtain such data are likely to impact overall model performance.
Water-level data for each piezometer at the first sampling date on or after 1st July 1986 were extracted from the NOW’s Groundwater Data System (GDS) for observation bores in the study area.
Water-level data were manually inspected to remove ‘bad’ or ‘suspect’ values, then the initial heads of all layers specified in the model were obtained using SURFERTM software. This process caused some cells at the margins of layers 1 and 2 to start as dry (that is, the interpolated heads were below the
layer base), because there are fewer observation bores near the lateral boundaries of the model area and layers 1 and 2 generally rise in elevation towards these boundaries. The starting heads in these cells were therefore specified as a nominal height above the bottom of layer 1. The resulting SURFER
‘grid’ files were imported directly into Groundwater Vistas for analysis. The starting heads contours are graphically displayed in Appendix 2.
3.4 Aquifer parameters
Transient numerical models require knowledge of hydraulic conductivity and storage capacity of the aquifer medium in each cell to compute the flow between adjacent cells and the rate of movement of water to and from storage. Usually, the parameters such as hydraulic conductivity and storativity of
material forming the aquifer vary across the model area laterally as well as vertically. Aquifer parameters are generally estimated from pumping tests.
Following pumping test analysis, Anderson (1993) suggested ranges of aquifer transmissivity for the
depth range 24.4 to 60 m. Transmissivity varied from 49 to 1200 m2/d around the Jemalong and Wyldes Plains Irrigation Districts. There is no trend evident either spatially, or with depth. Several NOW irrigation bores have been pump tested. Bore 25165, of the Mulguthrie Section, was pump
tested at a depth of 60.9-70 m, giving rise to a transmissivity of 71 m2/d. Similarly, bores 36551 and
18| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
36523 of the Corinella section were pump tested. For bore 36551, the aquifer tested was at a depth of 60.47-63.76 m and the transmissivity value determined was 780 m2/d. The zone tested in bore 36523 was a much deeper Lachlan Formation aquifer (119.6-122.6 m) and transmissivity was found to be
1160 m2/d.
Megalla and Kalf, (1973) recommended specific yield value of 0.10 for the alluvials in the region and Coffey (2006) used a value of 0.04.
Based on the calibrated aquifer parameters, Coffey (2006) estimated hydraulic conductivity to be in range 3 - 28 m/d for the Lachlan Formation and 1 m/d for the Cowra Formation. They estimated vertical leakance between the Cowra and Lachlan Formation to be 5.3x10-7 d-1.
Barnett and Muller (2008) used calibrated hydraulic conductivity values from 1 to 10 m/d for the Upper and Lower Cowra Formation and between 10 and 100 m/d for the Lachlan Formation.
These values were used to identify upper and lower hydraulic property bounds and initial estimates for
the model. Some values were changed to obtain a better calibration during the calibration process.
Specification of hydraulic conductivity (in X- and Y- directions) and storage factors (specific yield and storage coefficient) for each zone is needed in Groundwater Vistas. For the Upper Cowra Formation,
which is unconfined, specific yield is used in MODFLOW computations. For the Lower Cowra and Lachlan aquifer, which are designated as 'confined/unconfined', both specific yield and storage coefficient are needed. As long as the aquifer remains confined during simulation, the assigned
specific yield values have no impact on the model. If it becomes unconfined at any stage during simulation, then MODFLOW uses specific yield in place of storage coefficient in computations.
For a model consisting of more than one layer a vertical conductance term, known as vertical
leakance (VCONT) is also required for all but the lower most layer. This parameter represents the leakage occurring between two model layers and is defined in terms of layer thicknesses and vertical hydraulic conductivities as shown in Figure 3-4.
In Groundwater Vistas, the user has the option either to specify vertical leakance for each parameter zone or to allow MODFLOW to compute vertical leakance based on the above relationship. However, the latter will require specification of the hydraulic conductivity in the vertical direction in each zone.
Aquifer parameters together with layer elevations are written into the block-centred-flow (BCF) package in MODFLOW.
Figure 3-4 Definition of Vertical Leakance Parameter (VCONT) (from Chiang & Kinzelbach, 1996)
19| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
3.5 Boundary conditions
Boundary conditions determine where water enters or leaves the model domain and in what quantity. Commonly three different boundary conditions are identified in groundwater modelling. They are
specified head, specified flow and mixed type (head dependent) boundaries. The discussion in this section is limited to the relationships between the spatial boundaries of model flow domain and the external environment.
Model boundaries in the east, north and south are specified as 'no-flow' which means that no groundwater flow occurs across these boundaries. The western boundary is designated as a 'constant head boundary (CHD) in which the head varied with time.
3.6 Well package
The well package is designed to represent extraction of water from cells and to account for such
losses in the finite difference equations. Recharging and discharging wells have positive and negative rates respectively. For each cell in each layer, only one value for net discharge can be specified for a given stress period.
This groundwater model simulates monthly stress periods and requires monthly frequency for data. Usage data prior to 1998 were relatively small and unreliable. However, after 1998 reliable annual groundwater usage data is available. In order to simulate pumping in the model it was necessary to
derive monthly usage patterns from the yearly usage data by applying a specified percentage distribution. Assumed pumping schedule is shown in Figure 3-5. However, the actual pattern of usage may vary with the purpose of the bore. For a listing of the bores used in the well package, refer to
Appendix 3.
Figure 3-5 Assumed monthly pumping and irrigation schedule
% of Usage
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
%
The model runs from July 1986 to June 2008; however before 1998 the usage data set is incomplete for the model period. A twelve year gap in usage data at the beginning of the model has implications
for the calibration of the model. If the applied stress from groundwater extraction is not accurate the model may not represent real conditions and may not calibrate properly as discussed in Bilge (2001) and Salotti (1997).
20| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
3.7 Recharge
The recharge package adds terms representing distributed recharge to the finite difference equation. In this study, the aquifer is recharged by rainfall, flood, irrigation and stream leakage. Recharge
relative contributions are further explained in section 4.6. All recharge sources may vary spatially as well as temporally. Recharge due to river leakage is considered separately under stream/aquifer interaction as discussed in Section 3.8. The remaining sources rainfall, flood and irrigation, are
simulated in the model using MODFLOW’s recharge package. Recharge is applied to the highest active layer.
3.7.1 Rainfall Recharge
Recharge from rainfall can occur in a number of ways. For example, it can occur through direct
infiltration beyond the root zone. Rainfall induced recharge can occur through side-slope run-off and ephemeral streams which may include lagoons and flood runners. As mentioned in Section 2.1, changes in the residual mass curves developed for the region compare well with changes in bore
water levels in undeveloped areas indicating a strong link between long-term rainfall trends and fluctuations of groundwater level.
A rainfall recharge rate of 2 % and bounds between 0.1 % and 5 % of average annual rainfall were
based on Dawes et al (2000) which provides estimates for medium scale catchments in the Liverpool Ranges of NSW, were used in initial model calibration attempts. These values were subsequently changed to obtain a better model calibration.
The assumed area of influence of each rainfall station based on the Thiessen method is shown in Figure 3-6.
Figure 3-6 Rainfall Recharge & Evaporation Distribution
410000 450000 490000 530000 570000 610000 650000
6170000
6200000
6230000
6260000
6290000
6320000
6350000
ZONE 1
ZONE 3
ZONE 4
ZONE 2
ZONE 6
ZONE 5
ZONE 7
ZONE 8
#65091 Cowra#73014
Grenfell
#65016Forbes
#65026Parkes
#50014Condobolin
#75039Lake Cargelligo
#50044West Wyalong
#73037Temora
21| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
3.7.2 Irrigation Recharge
Leakage from crop irrigation systems is a source of artificial recharge to the aquifer system. The irrigation recharge areas within the model are based on the department’s GIS Land Use Classification Mapping in 2000 as shown in Figure 3-7. These areas are assumed to be constant throughout the
calibration period (July 1986 - June 2008) but irrigation recharge rates are varied proportionately based on the historical record of surface water diversion.
The standard irrigation application rate for non-rice crop farmlands is 6 ML/ha/yr. Of this, about 5
ML/ha/yr is assumed to be lost through evaporation. Therefore, only 1ML/ha/yr is available for irrigation recharge. This is equivalent to 100 mm of water per farmland hectare per year which is the maximum irrigation recharge available after irrigation efficiency, crop interception and initial soil
moisture are taken into account Prathapar (pers. comm.).
Figure 3-7 Irrigation recharge areas
410000 440000 470000 500000 530000 560000 590000 620000 650000
6170000
6200000
6230000
6260000
6290000
6320000
6350000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
It is reasonable to assume that the component of irrigation recharge returns to the groundwater regime to be between 20 and 40 mm/ha/yr. In the current model surface water use during the calibration period (1986-2008) and spatial irrigated area water year 2000-2001 are available however, the pattern
of spatial growth of irrigated area over the years is not known accurately. Irrigation recharge of 30 mm/ha/yr in the water year 2000-2001 was assumed and the level of recharge for other years was estimated proportionately based on historical records of surface water diversion in each year. These
diversions are shown in Figure 3-8. The monthly irrigation schedule shown in Figure 3-2 was applied to the annual diversions to obtain monthly components of irrigation recharge. While this approach makes sure that the aquifer system received the full complement of irrigation recharge every year, it
fails to replicate accurately any local impacts on the water table due to irrigation practice.
22| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 3-8 Assumed yearly irrigation recharge rates
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
1986
-198
7
1987
-198
8
1988
-198
9
1989
-199
0
1990
-199
1
1991
-199
2
1992
-199
3
1993
-199
4
1994
-199
5
1995
-199
6
1996
-199
7
1997
-199
8
1998
-199
9
1999
-200
0
2000
-200
1
2001
-200
2
2002
-200
3
2003
-200
4
2004
-200
5
2005
-200
6
2006
-200
7
2007
-200
8
Date
Su
rfac
e W
ater
Use
ML
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Irri
gat
ion
Rec
har
ge
Rat
e m
m
SW USAGE
Irrigation RCH
3.7.3 Flood Recharge
In the period from July 1986 to June 2008 two flood events occurred within the model area, a major
event occurred in April-August 1990 and a minor event in June-July 1998. For the model, only the major event was taken as a recharge contributor. For this event the area coverage and the model hydrographs response are clearly visible. The inundated area during the 1990 flood is shown in Figure
3-9, based on available GIS flood maps.
The inundated area is divided into eight Thiessen polygons identical to the rainfall zones shown in Figure 3-6 for calibration purposes. Initial flood recharge fluxes for each zone varied from 0.0002 to
0.005 m/d. These values were adjusted during calibration. The period of flood inundation was seven months from May 1990 to November 1990.
23| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 3-9 Flood recharge areas
24| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
3.8 River aquifer interaction
Some interaction between streams and the shallow aquifer exists in most alluvial formations. The model indicates the Lachlan River suffers considerable losses to groundwater along its course. It is
likely that increased groundwater pumping in the vicinity of the river in recent years has contributed to some of these losses.
MODFLOW (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) simulates leakage between a river and the aquifer as a
vertical flow through the riverbed. The direction of leakage through a river cell depends on the relative positions of the groundwater level (Hijk) and the river stage (HRIV). The rate of leakage (QRIV) is controlled by the head and the conductance (CRIV) of the riverbed within a particular river cell (see
Equation 3.1).
QRIV = CRIV (HRIV – Hijk), for Hijk > RBOT (Equation 3.1)
CRIV = KLW / M
where, K = the conductivity of the riverbed material L = the river reach length W = the river width M = the thickness of riverbed material
If (HRIV – Hijk) < 0, then the seepage is in the direction of the river (a gaining river cell, see Figure 3-10). If (HRIV – Hijk) > 0, then the seepage is in the direction of the aquifer (a loosing river cell, see
Figure 3-10). In both these situations, it is assumed that the head in the aquifer is above the river bottom elevation (RBOT). However, there may be instances where the groundwater level (Hijk) falls below the river bottom. In such a situation, MODFLOW assumes a constant seepage from the river (a
percolating river cell). The rate of flow from the river is solved by Equation 3.2 is independent of further head decline of the aquifer (a percolating river cell as shown in Figure 3-10.
QRIV = CRIV (HRIV – RBOT), for Hijk RBOT (Equation 3.2)
Of the four parameters contributing to CRIV, only the river reach length (L) is known accurately. River width (W), river bed thickness (M) and hydraulic conductivity (K) in each river cell are difficult to estimate with any confidence. Hence, the lumped parameter, KW/M, is assumed initially and adjusted
during the calibration process.
The parameters required in MODFLOW’s river package to simulate stream/aquifer interaction for each designated river cell are the layer number, row and column of the cell, river stage, river bottom
elevation and river conductance. Groundwater VistasTM allows the specification of a reach number as well.
25| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 3-10 MODFLOW conceptualisation of river/aquifer interaction
Gaining river
Loosing river
Percolating river
There are thirteen gauging stations along the stretch of the river considered in this study. Of these, only seven stations have continuous records of river gauging data covering the entire model calibration period. River hydrographs at the seven stations, gauging station and weirs are given in Appendix 4.
The preparation of input data for MODFLOW involves a number of tasks, which are listed below:
Digitising river reach for the Lachlan River and processing river data to obtain river length within a cell.
Extractions of river stage data for each gauging station covering the model calibration period.
Estimation of missing data through interpolation.
Processing riverbed data from available gauging station elevations.
Establishment of hypothetical gauging stations and estimation of river stage data.
Preparation of the surface topography map of the model area on a cell-by-cell basis.
Processing data using a modified version of ‘VMRIVER’ software developed by Demetriou (1995) to create the river boundary file for Visual MODFLOW.
A schematic diagram of the 23 sections and thirteen gauging stations used in the model is presented in Figure 3-11. The river package has a total of 2037 river cells belonging to twenty three sections. River hydrographs and river gauging station and weirs are given in Appendix 4.
26| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
27| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 3-11 Schematic diagram of the river sections and gauging stations
1
2
3
45
6
789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
192021
22232425
2627
28
29
3031
3233
3435
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
4748
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
565758
596061
62
1234567
89
10
11
121314
1516
17
18
192021
22
23
24
25
2627
28
29
30
3132
33 34
3536
37 38
39
4041
4243
4445
46
47
48 49
5051
52
53
54
555657
58
59
60
6162
6364
65
66
67
6869
7071
72
7374
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
8687
88
8990
91
92
93
2
1
4
3
6
5
8
7
910
11
121314
20
19
18
17
16
15
22
21
23
24
25
2627
28
293031
33
32
36
35
34
39
38
37
404142
43
4445
4647
48
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
57
58
123
456
7
8
9
101 112
131 4
1 5161 7
1 81 9
2 0 2 1 22
23
242 52 627
282 9
3 0
3 132
33
3 4
3 5363 7
3 83 9
4 041
42
4 3
4 445
46
4 7
4 8 4 9
5 0
5 15 2
5 3
5 4
5 5565 7
5 859
60
6 1
62
636 4
6 5 66 6 7
68 6 9 70
7 1
7 2
737 475
767 7
7 87 980
8 1
8 2838 4
8 5 86
87
88
89
9 09 1929 394
959 6
9 798
9910 0
10 11 02
1 0310 4
10 5
1 06
1 07
1 0810 91 1011 1
11 21 13
1 14
1 15
1 16
1 17
1 18
1 191 20
1 21
1
23
4 5
67
8
91 0
1 1
1 213
14
1 5
1 6171 8
1 92 021
22
23
242 5
2 6
272 8
2 93 0313 2
3 334
35
36 3 7 38
39 4 0 4 1
4 2 43
44
4 7
4 8
1
23
46
7891011
1213
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
2223
242526272829303132
33
3435
36
3738
39
40414243
44 45
464748
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57123
45
6
7
8
910
11
1213
141516
17181920
21
2223
2425
26
27
28
2930
313233
34
35 36
373839
4041
4243
44
45
4647
48 49
50 51 52
5354
5556
5758
5960
61
62
63
6465
66 67
6869
70717273
74
7576
7778
79 80
8182
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
919293
94 95 96
979899
100
101
102
103104
105
106107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118119
120121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128129
130 131
132133
134
135136
137138139
140
141 142
143
144
145
146
147148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159160
161
16212
3
45
6
78
9
1011
1213
14 15
1617
18 19
202122
23
2425
26
27
282930
31
32
33
34
3536
37 38
3940
414243
444546
47
48
49 50
51
52
53
54
5556
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
6869
70
7172
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
8485
86
87
8889
9091
92 93
949596
1
2
3 4
56
789
10
11 12
1314
15
16
17
18
1920
21
26
25
22
30
27
24
23
32
31
29
28
33
35
34
37
36
46
47
38
39
43
45
48
49
50
51
40
41
42
44
52
54
53
56
55
58
57
63
60
59
64
62
61
65
67
68
66
697071
72
79
78
77
74
73
80
76
75
81
83
82
84
85
91
90
89
86
93
92
88
87
94
95
98
99
96
97
100
101
109
103
102
110
105
104
112
111
108
107
106
114
113
125
126
127
116
115
123
124
128
117
118
121
122
130
129
119
120
131132
133
137
136
135
134
140
139
138
141
142143
144
145
149
148
147
146
150
151
152
153
154
155
156157
160
159
158
161
162
163
166
165
164
168
167
169170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
185
184
183
182
186187
188
191
190
189
192
195
194
193
19612
34
56
7
8910
11
12
13
141516171819
20212223
24
252627
28
2930
31
32
33
34
353637
3839
40
41
42
43
44
4546
4748
49
50
51
52
535455
5657
58
5960
6162
63
64
65
66
6768
69707172
7374
7576777879
8081
8283
84 85
8687
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
9899100
101
102103104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125126127
1
2
34
5
6
7
89
1011
121314
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2526
2728
2930
3132
33
34
35363738
39
40
41
42
43
4445
4647
484950
5152
53
545556
57
58
596061
626364
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
8081
82
83
84
85
86
87
888990
9192
93 94
9596
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125126127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138139140
141
142
143
144
145
146147148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156157158159
160161
162163164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171172173174175
176
177178
179180181
182 183
184 185
186
187 188
189190
191
192
193
194
195196
197
198
199
200
201202
203
204205
206 207
208209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221222
223
224225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235236237
238 239
240241
242243244245
246
247248249250
251252253
254
255256
257258
259 260
261
262
263 264
265
266
267
268 269 270
271272273
274 275
276277
278 279
280281
282 283
284285
286 287 288
289 290
291 292 293
294295
12
34
56
7
89
1011
12 13
1415
16
17
1819
20
212223
24
25
2627
2829
303132
33
34
353637
3839
4041
42
434445
46
47
48
49
50
12
34
5
6
7
8
91 0
1 1
1 213
1 415
161 7
1 8
1 9202 1
222 324
252 6
2 72 8
2 9293 0
1
23
45
6 7 8
91011
121314
151617
181920
2122
2324
25
2627
28
29 30 31
32 33 34
35
3637
38
12
34
56
7
8
910
1112
1314
15
16
17 18
1920
21
22
23
242526
2728
29
3031
32 33 34 35
363738
39 40
41
424344
4546
4748
49
5051
5253
545556
5758
59
60 61 62
63
6465
6667
68
6970
71
7273
74
75
7677
78
79
808182
8384
85
86
87
88
89
9091
92
9394
1234567891011121314
15
16
17181920
212223242526
27282930
31
32 33
34
35
36 37 38 39 40
414243
44 45
464748
4950
5152
5354
5556575859
606162
63646566676869707172737475
76
777879808182
83
84
858687888990919293
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102103104105
106107108109
110111
112113114
115116
117
118119120
121
122
123
124125
126
127
128129
130 131
132133
134 135
136137
138
139140
141
142143
144 145
146
147148
149150151
152
153154155
156 157
158159160
161162
163 164
165166167
168
169
170171172
173174175176177178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188189190
191
192
193194
195
196197198
199
200
201
202203204205
206207208
209210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226227
228
229230
231
232
233234235
236237
238239
240241
242243
244
245246
247
248249
250251
252253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266267
268
269
270271
272273274275276
1 2
3 4 5
67
8 9
10 11
1213
14151617
1819
20
21222324
25
26
27 28
29
303132
3334
3536
37 38
39
4041
42 43
44 45
46474849
5051
5253
54
1
23
4 5 6
7
8 9 10
111213
1415
1617
18
1920
2122
2324
25
26
27
2829
30
31
32
33
34
35 36
37
3839
40
4142
43
44
4546
4748
4950
5152
535455
565758
596061
62
636465
6667
68697071
727374
757677
787980
81
82 83 84
8586
8788
89 90 91
9293
Sec17
Sec 18
Sec19
sec20
21sec22c23 *
No
de1
No
de2
lac_
s
ba _s
002
12
033
412009
412030
secse
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ck
41
2
4
man_s
bel_s
sec1
sec3
sec8
sec4
sec5
* ***
sec6
sec9
sec2
Node3
sec15
sec11
sec10sec14
sec13
sec16
412011
goo_s
lac_
412072
e *
*
*
*
* ***
*
Goobank Ck
LACHLAN R
Mendagery Ck
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
3.9 Evaporation
MODFLOW’s evapotranspiration (EVT) package simulates the effects of plant transpiration and direct evaporation in removing water from the saturated groundwater regime (McDonald & Harbaugh, 1988).
As implemented in MODFLOW, for each model surface cell a maximum rate of evapotranspiration (ET) is specified for each surface cell together with an ET surface elevation and an ‘extinction depth’. When the water table depth is at or above the ET surface, evapotranspiration occurs at the maximum
specified rate. When the water table lies below the extinction depth, zero evapotranspiration occurs. Between these two depths, evapotranspiration varies linearly.
Eight evapotranspiration zones were introduced in the model area, identical to the distribution of
recharge zones presented in Figure 3-6. A starting value of 10% of the potential evaporation (m/d) recorded at weather stations were specified as the initial evapotranspiration rate at the ground surface in all eight zones. The extinction depth was varied from 3 to 9 meters below the surface across the
model area. Evapotranspiration is applied to the highest active layer.
3.10 Solver
The 'Geometric Multigrid (GMG)' is used as the mathematical solver in this model. The parameter settings for the package are shown in Table 3-3.
Table 3-3 Parameter settings in GMG solver package
Maximum Inner Iterations 500
Maximum Outer Iterations 1
Head Change Criterion for Convergence 0.001
Inner Convergence Criterion 0.1
Relaxation Parameter 0
Adaptive Damping Flag 0
Output Control Flag 4
Damping parameter 1.0
28| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
4. Model calibration
Calibration of a numerical groundwater flow model can be accomplished by determining a set of
parameters, boundary conditions and stresses that produce simulated heads and fluxes in order to match field-measured values within a pre-established range of error. Finding this set of values from a set of observed heads amounts to solving the inverse problem (Anderson, Gates & Mount, 1993).
During the calibration process, important model parameters are adjusted, within realistic limits, to produce the best match between simulated and observed data. The process begins with an initial estimation of parameters (hydraulic conductivity horizontal and vertical, specific yield, recharge,
boundary conditions, etc.) for each active cell in the model grid. Adjustment of parameters can be done manually or automatically. Automatic calibration method was attempted in the current model.
PEST (Doherty, 2005) is nonlinear parameter estimation software which is used in automatically
calibrating complex groundwater models. PEST was used in “regularisation mode” coupled with “pilot points” as a method of spatial parameterisation to calibrate the current model. A total of 1845 estimable parameters were used. PEST software can automatically adjust model parameters to
minimise the discrepancies between the observed data and model predicted values (residuals). The objective function (phi), defined as the ‘sum of squares of weighted residuals’ is used as a calibration statistic. In a mathematical sense, a lower objective function indicates better model calibration.
The starting and ending times of the model calibration period are 1/7/1986 and 30/06/2008 respectively.
Water level data from observation bores in the model area were utilised to obtain target results for
calibration. Thirty-four observations bores in layer 1, ninety four bores in layer 2 and fifty in layer 3 were used for the model. Their spatial distribution is shown in Appendix 5.
4.1 Automatic calibration
Nonlinear parameter estimation software is commonly used in calibrating complex groundwater models. PEST is one such nonlinear parameter estimator which is powerful and model independent.
PEST was used in "regularisation mode" coupled with "pilot points" as a method of spatial parameterisation to calibrate the current model. SVD-Assist is a powerful new model calibration tool available in PEST which embodies a hybrid regularisation methodology that combines the strengths of
subspace methods, for example singular value decomposition (truncated SVD), and Tikhonov regularisation methodologies.
In the pilot point parameterisation scheme, parameter values are assigned to a set of points
distributed throughout the model domain. These parameter values are then spatially interpolated to the individual cells of the model grid using the spatial interpolation method ‘kriging’. Regularisation across the entire model domain is allowed to take place with ‘preferred parameter’ values included as
‘regularisation observations’ to enforce a smoothing condition. The fundamental purpose of regularisation is to prevent extreme parameter values at pilot points and to produce a smooth parameter distribution.
The number of pilot points used in each layer varied and the parameters estimated are summarised below:
layer 1 hydraulic conductivity (kx1_1 to kx1_164)
layer 1 specific yield (sy1_1 to sy1_164)
leakance between the layers (le1_1 to le1_164)
29| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
layer 2 hydraulic conductivity (kx2_1 to kx2_221)
layer 2 storage coefficient (ss2_1 to ss2_221)
layer 2 specific yield (sy2_1 to sy2_221)
leakance between the layers (le2_1 to le2_156)
layer 3 hydraulic conductivity (kx3_1 to kx3_156)
layer 3 storage coefficient (ss3_1 to ss3_156)
layer 3 specific yield (sy3_1 to sy3_156)
Zone based rainfall, flood recharge (prain1 to prain8 and fflux to fflux) and evapotranspiration (pevt1 to pevt9) parameters were also included as adjustable parameters. The number of river reaches was increased from one to forty one (riv1 to riv41) to allow better estimates of river/aquifer interaction.
The locations of pilot points used for layer 2 of the model (Lower Cowra Formation) are shown in Figure 4-1. For the other layers, with lesser active area, a subset of these was used. Model parameters representing different hydraulic properties at each of the pilot points are named uniquely.
This nomenclature is summarised in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Model Parameters
LAYER Hydraulic Property No. of Pilot Points Parameters Names1 Hydraulic Conductivity 164 kx1_1 to kx1_1641 Specific yield 164 sy1_1 to sy1_1641 Leakance 164 le1_1 to le1_1642 Hydraulic Conductivity 221 kx2_1 to kx2_2212 Specific yield 221 sy2_1 to sy2_2212 Leakance 156 le2_1 to le2_1562 Storage coefficient 221 ss2_1 to ss2_2213 Hydraulic Conductivity 156 kx3_1 to kx3_1563 Specific yield 156 sy3_1 to sy3_1563 Storage coefficient 156 ss3_1 to ss3_156
Rainfall 8 prain 1 to prain 8Flood 8 fflux1 to flux8Evapotranspiration 9 pevt1 to pevt 9River 41 riv1 to riv 41
Total 1845
All parameters in each group assumed an initial value equal to the average parameter value obtained from a previous model by Coffey (2006) and Barnett &Muller, (2008) with some adjustments based on available pumping test analysis. Furthermore, all parameters in each group were subjected to the
same constraints in the form of minimum and maximum values.
Altogether, there were 1845 parameters, 16836 observations with non-zero weight and 17 observation groups listed in the PEST control file. The SVD-assist parameter estimation process requires a pre-
SVD-assist PEST run which is carried out specifically for the purpose of calculation of derivatives. SVD-assisted parameter estimation was then carried out using 600 super parameters which are essentially linear combinations of base parameters.
30| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-1 Location of pilot points in the Lower Cowra Formation
380000 400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 540000 560000 580000 600000 620000 640000 660000 680000
6120000
6140000
6160000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
6380000
6400000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
4.2 Final estimates of aquifer parameters
The calibration of model parameters was a major task. The calibrated parameters include horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) for all layers, VCONT (vertical leakance) between layer 1 and layer 2 and layer 2 and layer 3; storage coefficient (S) of the lower layers, which are unconfined/confined; and
specific yield (Sy) of the layer1, which is unconfined. The calibrated hydraulic conductivity values of Upper Cowra vary from 30 to 0.01 m/d; for the Lower Cowra layer the values range from 40 to 0.01 m/d. The Lachlan Formation has conductivity values ranging from 1 to 100 m/d. The calibrated values
of minimum and maximum specific yield of layer 1 are between 0.02 and 0.3 respectively. The calibrated specific storage (Ss) ranges from 10-4 to 10-6 for deeper layers.
Figure 4-2 shows the calibrated horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh) values for the Upper Cowra
Formation. A variation in Kh values is evident in this diagram. Areas of high Kh exist along the ancient Lachlan palaeo channel part of the model area.. These areas have values between 5 and 30 m/d. Most of the Upper Cowra aquifer has Kh values between 5 and 10 m/d.
31| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-3 shows the calibrated Kh values for the Lower Cowra Formation. A large part of this layer shows moderate to high values in the range of 5 to 35 m/d. Values are higher in the Lower Cowra Formation than in the Upper Cowra Formation.
For the Lachlan Formation horizontal hydraulic conductivity values vary between 1 and 100 m/d over the model area as shown in Figure 4-4.
In auto-calibration changes to specific yield (Sy) values were typically aimed at improving the
calibration for the upper layer of Cowra. With lower Sy values, the model would typically become more sensitive to recharge rates, and would tend to create higher simulated heads in layer 1. Figure 4-5 shows the distribution of (Sy) values for layer 1. These values range from 0.06 to 0.14, indicating a
medium degree of variability in the sediments of the layer1 formation.
Parameters representing the storage coefficient (S) of the Lower Cowra and Lachlan Formations were important. Changes to S values were usually aimed at increasing or decreasing the simulated
pressure ranges to match those caused by seasonal pumping. This typically required orders-of-magnitude changes in S for each run. The layer 2 formation storage coefficient distribution in Figure 4-6 shows values around 10-6, with little spatial variability. The storage coefficient in the Lachlan
Formation is about 8.8e-5 with very little spatial variability as shown in Figure 4-7.
Figures 4-8 and 4-9 show the calibrated vertical leakance VCONT values for the Upper Cowra Formation (layer 1) and the Lower Cowra Formation (layer 2), respectively. VCONT values are
significantly higher in layer 1, ranging from 0.01 to 0.001 m/d.
Calibrated river conductance is represented in Figure 4-10. It varies from 1 to 2000 m2/d/km. The conductance is, nevertheless difficult to assess by model calibration, as it can be varied by several
orders of magnitude without much apparent effect as discussed by Merrick, (1989).
The remaining calibrated parameters are listed in Table 4-2.
32| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-2 Hydraulic Conductivity (m/d) distributions in Upper Cowra (Layer 1)
410000 450000 490000 530000 570000 610000 650000
6170000
6200000
6230000
6260000
6290000
6320000
6350000
0.01
0.1
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
Figure 4-3 Hydraulic Conductivity (m/d) distributions in Lower Cowra (Layer 2)
410000 450000 490000 530000 570000 610000 650000
6170000
6200000
6230000
6260000
6290000
6320000
6350000
1
11
1
1
5
5
5
55
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1010
15
15
15
151515
1515 2020
2020
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
2525
25
25
25
25
30
30
30 30
35
35
35
40
0.01
0.1
1
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
33| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-4 Hydraulic Conductivity (m/d) distributions in Lachlan Formation
Figure 4-5 Specific yield distributions in Upper Cowra
0.06
34| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-6 Storage Coefficient in Lower Cowra
Figure 4-7 Storage Coefficient in Lachlan Formation
35| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-8 Vertical Leakance (1/d) between Upper and Lower Cowra
410000 450000 490000 530000 570000 610000 650000
6170000
6200000
6230000
6260000
6290000
6320000
6350000
1E-0051E
-005
0.00010.0
001
0.001
0.01
Figure 4-9 Leakance (1/d) between Lower Cowra and Lachlan Formation
410000 450000 490000 530000 570000 610000 650000
6170000
6200000
6230000
6260000
6290000
6320000
6350000
1E-007
1E-006
1E-005
0.0001
0.001
0.01
36| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
37| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 4-10 Calibrated River Conductance in m2/d/km.
1
2
3
45
6
789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
192021
22232425
2627
28
29
3031
3233
3435
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
4748
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
565758
596061
62
1234567
89
10
11
121314
1516
17
18
192021
22
23
24
25
2627
28
29
30
3132
33 34
3536
37 38
39
4041
4243
4445
46
47
48 49
5051
52
53
54
555657
58
59
60
6162
6364
65
66
67
6869
7071
72
7374
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
8687
88
8990
91
92
93
2
1
4
3
6
5
8
7
910
11
121314
20
19
18
17
16
15
22
21
23
24
25
2627
28
293031
33
32
36
35
34
39
38
37
404142
43
4445
4647
48
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
57
58
123
456
7
8
9
101112
1314
151617
1819
20 21 22
23
24252627
2829
30
3132
33
34
353637
3839
4041
42
43
4445
46
47
48 49
50
5152
53
54
555657
5859
60
61
62
6364
65 66 67
68 69 70
71
72
737475
7677
787980
81
828384
85 86
87
88
89
9091929394
9596
9798
99100
101102
103104
105
106
107
108109110111
112113
114
115
116
117
118
119120
121
1
23
4 5
67
8
910
11
1213
14
15
161718
192021
22
23
2425
26
2728
29303132
3334
35
36 37 38
39 40 41
42 43
44
47
48
1
23
46
7891011
1213
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
2223
242526272829303132
33
3435
36
3738
39
40414243
44 45
464748
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57123
45
6
7
8
910
11
1213
141516
17181920
21
2223
2425
26
27
28
2930
313233
34
35 36
373839
4041
4243
44
45
4647
48 49
50 51 52
5354
5556
5758
5960
61
62
63
6465
66 67
6869
70717273
74
7576
7778
79 80
8182
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
919293
94 95 96
979899
100
101
102
103104
105
106107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118119
120121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128129
130 131
132133
134
135136
137138139
140
141 142
143
144
145
146
147148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159160
161
16212
3
45
6
78
9
1011
1213
14 15
1617
18 19
202122
23
2425
26
27
282930
31
32
33
34
3536
37 38
3940
414243
444546
47
48
49 50
51
52
53
54
5556
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
6869
70
7172
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
8485
86
87
8889
9091
92 93
949596
1
2
3 4
56
789
10
11 12
1314
15
16
17
18
1920
21
26
25
22
30
27
24
23
32
31
29
28
33
35
34
37
36
46
47
38
39
43
45
48
49
50
51
40
41
42
44
52
54
53
56
55
58
57
63
60
59
64
62
61
65
67
68
66
697071
72
79
78
77
74
73
80
76
75
81
83
82
84
85
91
90
89
86
93
92
88
87
94
95
98
99
96
97
100
101
109
103
102
110
105
104
112
111
108
107
106
114
113
125
126
127
116
115
123
124
128
117
118
121
122
130
129
119
120
131132
133
137
136
135
134
140
139
138
141
142143
144
145
149
148
147
146
150
151
152
153
154
155
156157
160
159
158
161
162
163
166
165
164
168
167
169170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
185
184
183
182
186187
188
191
190
189
192
195
194
193
19612
34
56
7
8910
11
12
13
141516171819
20212223
24
252627
28
2930
31
32
33
34
353637
3839
40
41
42
43
44
4546
4748
49
50
51
52
535455
5657
58
5960
6162
63
64
65
66
6768
69707172
7374
7576777879
8081
8283
84 85
8687
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
9899100
101
102103104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125126127
1
2
34
5
6
7
89
1011
121314
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2526
2728
2930
3132
33
34
35363738
39
40
41
42
43
4445
4647
484950
5152
53
545556
57
58
596061
626364
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
8081
82
83
84
85
86
87
888990
9192
93 94
9596
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125126127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138139140
141
142
143
144
145
146147148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156157158159
160161
162163164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171172173174175
176
177178
179180181
182 183
184 185
186
187 188
189190
191
192
193
194
195196
197
198
199
200
201202
203
204205
206 207
208209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221222
223
224225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235236237
238 239
240241
242243244245
246
247248249250
251252253
254
255256
257258
259 260
261
262
263 264
265
266
267
268 269 270
271272273
274 275
276277
278 279
280281
282 283
284285
286 287 288
289 290
291 292 293
294295
12
34
56
7
89
1011
12 13
1415
16
17
1819
20
212223
24
25
2627
2829
303132
33
34
353637
3839
4041
42
434445
46
47
48
49
50
12
34
5
6
7
8
910
11
1213
1415
1617
18
192021
222324
2526
2728
292930
1
23
45
6 7 8
91011
121314
151617
181920
2122
2324
25
2627
28
29 30 31
32 33 34
35
3637
38
12
34
56
7
8
910
1112
1314
15
16
17 18
1920
21
22
23
242526
2728
29
3031
32 33 34 35
363738
39 40
41
424344
4546
4748
49
5051
5253
545556
5758
59
60 61 62
63
6465
6667
68
6970
71
7273
74
75
7677
78
79
808182
8384
85
86
87
88
89
9091
92
9394
1234567891011121314
15
16
17181920
212223242526
27282930
31
32 33
34
35
36 37 38 39 40
414243
44 45
464748
4950
5152
5354
5556575859
606162
63646566676869707172737475
76
777879808182
83
84
858687888990919293
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102103104105
106107108109
110111
112113114
115116
117
118119120
121
122
123
124125
126
127
128129
130 131
132133
134 135
136137
138
139140
141
142143
144 145
146
147148
149150151
152
153154155
156 157
158159160
161162
163 164
165166167
168
169
170171172
173174175176177178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188189190
191
192
193194
195
196197198
199
200
201
202203204205
206207208
209210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226227
228
229230
231
232
233234235
236237
238239
240241
242243
244
245246
247
248249
250251
252253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266267
268
269
270271
272273274275276
1 2
3 4 5
67
8 9
10 11
1213
14151617
1819
20
21222324
25
26
27 28
29
303132
3334
3536
37 38
39
4041
42 43
44 45
46474849
5051
5253
54
1
23
4 5 6
7
8 9 10
111213
1415
1617
18
1920
2122
2324
25
26
27
2829
30
31
32
33
34
35 36
37
3839
40
4142
43
44
4546
4748
4950
5152
535455
565758
596061
62
636465
6667
68697071
727374
757677
787980
81
82 83 84
8586
8788
89 90 91
9293
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
41
41
*
200
2
203
3
412009
412030
*
**
Node3
412011*
*
*
*
412072
* ****
Goobank Ck
LACHLAN R
Mendagery Ck
323
14
598
130
314
202
19992000
10
11
10262
59
2000466
223
583
59904
341
127135
36103
3493
1682
473
250
85
28
133
428
1
2000
132
1
147
146
1
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Table 4-2 Calibrated Model Parameters.
RIVERRiver Bed Hydraulic Conductivity RAINFALL
Parameter m2/d/km Parameter Rate (%)riv1 323.5 prain1 1.9riv2 14.3 prain2 0.1riv3 598.0 prain3 2.9riv4 130.2 prain4 3.0riv5 313.6 prain5 0.1riv6 20.4 prain6 0.1riv7 2.5 prain7 3.0riv8 1999.2 prain8 3.0riv9 1999.9riv10 10.0riv11 10.6riv12 10.1riv13 262.4 FLOODriv14 58.6 Parameter mmriv15 2000.0 fflux1 0.2-5riv16 145.6 fflux2 0.2-5riv17 465.5 fflux3 0.2-5riv18 222.9 fflux4 0.05-1.25riv19 583.4 fflux5 0.2-5riv20 58.7 fflux6 0.05-1.25riv21 904.3 fflux7 0.05-1.25riv22 341.4 fflux8 0.2-5riv23 127.0riv24 135.4 EVAPORATIONriv25 36.1 Parameter Rate (%) Extinction Depth (m)riv26 103.1 pevt1 5 6riv27 33.7 pevt2 1 4riv28 93.5 pevt3 25 9riv29 1681.6 pevt4 5 4riv30 472.6 pevt5 7.5 4riv31 250.1 pevt6 25 9riv32 84.8 pevt7 25 8riv33 27.8 pevt8 4.8 3riv34 132.8 pevt9 4.9 5riv35 428.0riv36 1.0riv37 2000.0riv38 131.9riv39 1.0riv40 1.0riv41 147.2
38| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
4.3 Head response
Plots of observed and simulated hydrographs for each calibration bores are presented in Appendix 6. These comparison plots are presented in eight groups primarily based on their location. The locations
of these bores are shown in Appendix 5. There are total 174 hydrograph in Appendix 6.
Except in zone 7, most monitoring bores show that water levels in layers 1 and 2 sharply increased in response to the flood event of 1990. Following the flood event water levels remained generally steady
until the year 2000. After that the water levels show a sharp decline which is attributed to increased groundwater usage coupled with drought conditions.
Most of the monitoring bores in layer 3 also follow the same trend as that observed in layers 1 & 2.
However, at some of the calibration bores, simulated water levels do not fluctuate as much as the corresponding observed water levels. In particular, predicted drawdowns are often less than that measured. This may be attributed to the lack of monthly pumping data. Accurate monthly pumping
records are necessary to quantify the amount of aquifer stress. Pumping records are not reliable before 1998 and after this only annual totals were reported. But the groundwater model simulates monthly stress period and ideally requires monthly pumping values.
Simulated and observed water levels in zone 7 do not match well suggesting the model is poorly calibrated in this area. A poor match in this area was also noted in Coffey (2006). In zones 1 and 2 the simulated and observed heads show a similar trend but simulated values are higher than observed
values in all layers. Reasons for these mismatches are unclear but it is likely that knowledge of the local geology was not sufficient to have allowed construction of a realistic model in this area.
In the remaining zones the model mostly matches the observed pattern well.
4.4 Calibration assesment
The modelling guidelines by Middlemis, et al., (2001) recommend evaluation of the degree of calibration of a groundwater model using both qualitative (visual comparison) and quantitative (statistical) means. Quantitative measures assessing calibration usually involve mathematical and
graphical comparisons between measured and simulated aquifer heads and the calculation of statistics regarding residuals.
Figures 4-11 to 4-13 provide, for each layer, scattergrams of the simulated water levels. In diagrams of
this sort, a 45o line through the origin represents a perfect calibration with a coefficient of determination of one (R2 = 1). The extent of scatter about this line is regarded as a measure of the goodness of model calibration. Some minor discrepancies between the observed and simulated aquifer heads are
to be expected in a model of this magnitude. Low SRMS (scaled root mean square) value (less than 5%) is normally regarded as another indicator of a well calibrated model. According to these criteria, this model is well calibrated. For layer 1, simulated values are closely clustered about the 45o line with a root mean square (RMS) of 2.01 meters and a mean sum of residuals of 1.41 meters for 3175 observation data.
39| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-11 Layer 1 Scattergram of modelled versus measured heads and statistics results.
Sum of Squares (m**2) SSQ = 12784.33 m**2Mean Sum of Squares (m) MSSQ = 4.03 mRoot Mean Square (m) RMS = 2.01 mScaled Root Mean Square (%) SRMS = 1.37 %Root Mean Fraction Square (%) RMFS = 0.87 %Scaled Root Mean Fraction Square (%) SRMFS = 1.30 %Sum of Residuals (m) SR = 4479.08 mMean Sum of Residuals (m) MSR = 1.41 mScaled Mean Sum of Residuals (%) SMSR = 0.96 %Coefficient of Determination (tend to unity) CD = 0.98
y = 1.0057x - 0.1619
R2 = 0.9967
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
150 170 190 210 230 250 270 290
Measured mAHD
Mo
del
led
mA
HD
40| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
The scattergram plot of Layer 2 Figure 4-12 shows scatter with a RMS value of 4.84 metres for 7515 observation data points.
Figure 4-12 Layer 2 Scattergram of modelled versus measured heads and statistics results.
Sum of Squares (m**2) SSQ = 176109.83 m**2Mean Sum of Squares (m) MSSQ = 23.43 mRoot Mean Square (m) RMS = 4.84 mScaled Root Mean Square (%) SRMS = 3.68 %Root Mean Fraction Square (%) RMFS = 2.29 %Scaled Root Mean Fraction Square (%) SRMFS = 3.84 %Sum of Residuals (m) SR = 24519.70 mMean Sum of Residuals (m) MSR = 3.26 mScaled Mean Sum of Residuals (%) SMSR = 2.48 %Coefficient of Determination (tend to unity) CD = 1.08
y = 1.0251x - 2.5559
R2 = 0.9892
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
310
150 170 190 210 230 250 270 290
Measured m AHD
Mo
del
led
m A
HD
41| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
The scattergram for layer 3 shown in Fig. 4-13 recorded a RMS of 7.16 meters for 5948 observation data points.
Figure 4-13 Layer 3 Scattergram of modelled versus measured heads and statistics results.
Sum of Squares (m**2) SSQ = 304776.02 m**2Mean Sum of Squares (m) MSSQ = 51.24 mRoot Mean Square (m) RMS = 7.16 mScaled Root Mean Square (%) SRMS = 4.46 %Root Mean Fraction Square (%) RMFS = 1.84 %Scaled Root Mean Fraction Square (%) SRMFS = 2.58 %Sum of Residuals (m) SR = 14876.54 mMean Sum of Residuals (m) MSR = 2.50 mScaled Mean Sum of Residuals (%) SMSR = 1.56 %Coefficient of Determination (tend to unity) CD = 1.18
y = 0.9813x + 9.6177
R2 = 0.9779
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
310
150 170 190 210 230 250 270 290 310
Measured mAHD
Mo
del
led
mA
HD
Figure 4-14 is a plot of the simulated heads versus the observed heads for all observations in all layers over the calibration period. RMS of 5.45 m, scaled RMS of 3.4% and sum of mean residual
values of 2.10 m for a total of 16836 observation data points indicates reasonably good calibration performance. Middlemis et al. (2001) suggested a criterion of about 5% for the scaled RMS to be regarded as a well calibrated model. A correlation coefficient of 0.9892 (nearly 1) also indicates a
strong relationship between the simulated and the observed heads.
Second plot presents the distribution of residuals (the difference between observed and simulated head) in all layers. A positive residual indicates an underestimate by the model where as a negative
residual is an overestimate. The plot indicates overall that the model slightly over estimates the water levels over the model domain. In summary 70% of simulated heads in all layers are within 1 metre of the corresponding observed water levels.
42| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-14 All Layers calibration assessment: scattergram of modelled versus measured heads, statistics and distribution of residuals results.
Sum of Squares (m**2) SSQ = 493671 m**2Mean Sum of Squares (m) MSSQ = 29.67 mRoot Mean Square (m) RMS = 5.45 mScale Root Mean Square (%) SRMS = 3.40 %Root Mean Fraction Square (%) RMFS = 2.08 %Scaled Root Mean Fraction Square (%) SRMFS = 2.88 %Sum of Residuals (m) SR = 34976.63 mMean Sum of Residuals (m) MSR = 2.10 mScaled Mean Sum of Residuals (%) SMSR = 1.31 %
y = 1.0175x - 0.8612
R2 = 0.9892
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
150 170 190 210 230 250 270 290
Measured mAHD
Mo
del
led
mA
HD
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
Residual m
Pro
bab
ility
%
43| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
4.5 Sensitivity analysis
.A product of the use of PEST is a table of parameter sensitivity values that provides a guide to the relative extent to which each model adjustable parameter affects the simulated groundwater levels.
The most sensitive parameters make a significant contribution to the behaviour of the model while those that are least sensitive contribute very little and have a wide range of acceptable values. The parameter sensitivities that PEST provides are not absolute measures. They vary, depending on the
parameter combinations used. Nevertheless, they provide a very useful guide to the relative importance of the adjustable model parameters.
Figure 4-15 shows a plot of parameter sensitivities provided by PEST for the parameter set chosen to
represent the calibrated model. Because of the large number of adjustable model parameters, only the 50 most sensitive parameters are represented for each layer in the diagram.
Evapotranspiration parameters are the most sensitive and river, hydraulic conductivity specific yield
and flood seem to have a moderate influence on model outcomes. Storage coefficient is the least sensitive of model parameters
44| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 4-15 Adjustable Model Parameter Sensitivities
Layer 1
0.00E+00
2.00E-03
4.00E-03
6.00E-03
8.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.20E-02
1.40E-02
1.60E-02
1.80E-02
2.00E-02p
evt
8p
evt
4riv
18
pe
vt9
fflu
x3p
evt
2riv
3riv
19
riv4
1ffl
ux6
riv2
6sy
1_
39
riv1
0riv
33
riv3
1riv
28
sy1
_1
3sy
1_
27
sy1
_0
8sy
1_
35
riv1
2sy
1_
37
sy1
_1
6sy
1_
36
riv4
fflu
x1sy
1_
32
sy1
_3
4riv
38
pra
in3
sy1
_8
8p
rain
1sy
1_1
21
sy1_
11
7sy
1_
14
sy1
_8
2sy
1_1
49
sy1_
14
7sy
1_
58
fflu
x7riv
36
sy1_
12
0sy
1_
64
sy1_
12
3sy
1_1
35
sy1
_3
3sy
1_
67
sy1_
13
6sy
1_
12
riv9
Parameters
Sen
siti
vity
Layer 2
0.00E+00
2.00E-03
4.00E-03
6.00E-03
8.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.20E-02
pevt
8sy
2_21
8kx
2_21
6pe
vt4
sy2_
214
riv9
kx2_
205
kx2_
204
riv18
sy2_
186
sy2_
93pe
vt9
pevt
2kx
2_96
sy2_
98sy
2_18
3kx
2_89
kx2_
203
sy2_
163
sy2_
92sy
2_20
4ff
lux3
kx2_
206
sy2_
181
sy2_
187
riv3
kx2_
218
sy2_
215
sy2_
212
sy2_
182
kx2_
196
kx2_
209
sy2_
190
riv31
riv11
sy2_
198
sy2_
221
kx2_
187
kx2_
109
kx2_
195
sy2_
194
kx2_
186
riv32
sy2_
191
sy2_
196
sy2_
210
fflu
x6sy
2_21
3riv
12sy
2_19
3
Parameters
Sen
siti
vity
Layer 3
0.00E+00
2.00E-03
4.00E-03
6.00E-03
8.00E-03
1.00E-02
1.20E-02
pevt
8pe
vt4
pevt
2riv
18pe
vt9
le2_
58kx
3_49 riv3
kx3_
84 riv9
riv11
kx3_
89kx
3_40
le2_
59kx
3_73
kx3_
23le
2_85
kx3_
67ff
lux3
kx3_
120
kx3_
97pr
ain1
kx3_
41kx
3_48
kx3_
53kx
3_19
kx3_
69kx
3_38
kx3_
47kx
3_37
kx3_
155
riv31
kx3_
119
riv10
le2_
84kx
3_92
le2_
97kx
3_14
le2_
41kx
3_88
kx3_
144
riv12
kx3_
70le
2_47
kx3_
36kx
3_42
kx3_
75kx
3_15
6kx
3_66
kx3_
12
Parameters
Sen
siti
vity
45| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
4.6 Water balance
The water balances presented in this chapter are based on the most recent calibration run which spans the 22 years from July 1986 to June 2008 and they pertain to the whole of the model area is
shown in Figure 2.7. Figure 4-16 presents a summary of water balance components for the calibrated model showing annual volumes averaged over the 22 year calibration period.
Figure 4-16 Model Water Balance Summary for July 1986 to June 2008
GroundwaterET River_out Pumping
Irrigation Flood Rainfall 118.52 River_in 17.02 17.77
9.54 14.63 109.12 53.19
2.89 storage change30.27 UP
Budget averaging period 1986 - 2008All volumes are in GL/year
Figure 4-16 summarises the amount of water being transferred into and out of storage by stresses
such as rainfall, irrigation, river, flood, evapotranspiration, boundary flows and extraction.
The annual average total recharge from all sources in the calibration period is 186.47 GL. This figure represents a summation of contributions from rainfall recharge, river, flood, irrigation,
evapotranspiration and lateral flow. The average rainfall recharge is about 58.5 % of the total recharge. River, flood and irrigation recharge contributions relative to total recharge are 28.5%, 7.8% and 5.2%, respectively.
The total annual average outflow in the GWMA 011 is 156.20 (118.52+17.02+17.77+2.89) GL. The evapotranspiration is about 75.8% of this total while the groundwater abstraction makes up 11.4%. River and lateral flow contributions relative to total outflow are 10.9% and 1.9%, respectively.
Evaporation is the dominant discharge source over the calibration period.
Figure 4-17 provides a breakdown of a water budget on a layer basis. The groundwater usage figures averaged over the 22 years are deceptive since heavy pumping started after 2000.
46| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
47| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 4-17 Average Annual water balance for individual layers for July 1986 to June 2008
GroundwaterRain+Flood+Irr River_in River_out Pumping ET
17.02 1.36 117.71
130.27 53.19
Out storage change0.22 28.59 UP
UP
UP
GroundwaterPumping ET layer 1
Rain+Flood+Irr 3.41 0.81 58.08
2.9576.62
Out1.00 storage change
0.83GroundwaterPumping 21.96 layer 2
Rain+Flood+Irr 12.99
0.0737.40
Out1.68 storage change
0.84 Budget averaging period 1986 - 2008All volumes are in GL/year
layer 3
It is important to realise that the recharge calculated is distributed over the entire model area which may not occur in practice in certain area thus the aquifer
system cannot cope with high rates of groundwater extraction (even if they are consistent with recognised sustainable yield). This has direct implications for the area of high yielding bores around Forbes and Cowra.
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
5. Scenario runs
An objective of the groundwater flow model was to generate various scenarios for aquifer
management purposes. ‘Dry’, ‘wet’ and ‘medium’ scenarios were formulated to examine the aquifer behaviour under “no pumping”, “current development” and “entitlements” conditions. It is hoped that the results of these scenarios will aid in the formulation of an appropriate aquifer management
strategy for the Upper Lachlan Aquifer system.
The selection of ‘dry’, ‘wet’ and ‘medium’ conditions is based on the historical rainfall pattern going back about 100 years. These data sets identified as Cdry, Cwet and Cmed. were supplied by CSIRO.
Each set of climate data was used to prepare relevant MODFLOW recharge and evapotranspiration packages.
For the MODFLOW river package, Integrated Quantity and Quality Model (IQQM) model generated
monthly flow data for the chosen period were converted to corresponding monthly river stage at gauging stations along the Lachlan River, Belubula River, Goobank Creek and Back Creek for each climatic variation (Cdry, Cwet and Cmed).
For the ‘wet’ scenario five flood events were applied over the 100 year period, based on exceedance of the river stage height of 5.7 metres at the gauging stations 412004 and 412002 in Figure 3-11. With the same criterion, three flood events were applied for the ‘dry’ and ‘med’ climatic variations. Floods
were applied over the area inundated by the 1990 flood.
Irrigation recharge was maintained at the 2000/2001 level in the absence of any other irrigated area spatial distribution data.
Heads at outflow CHD boundaries were fixed at long–term average values.
The three different climatic variation scenarios were run for three different groundwater extraction limits: ‘no pumping’, ‘current development’ and ‘maximum allocation’. The combination of three climate
scenarios and three pumping scenarios yielded nine scenarios in total.
The ‘no pumping scenario’ represents the natural condition where zero pumping occurs. The ‘current development scenario’ corresponds to the 2006-2007 water year in which the highest groundwater
usage (84.6 GL) was recorded. These data sets were applied from the end of the calibration period to June 2108. In order to assess the current development situation. The ‘entitlements’ scenario corresponds to the maximum allocation limit of 174.6 GL/year. These data were recycled 100 times to
allow simulation to year 2108.
All nine scenarios (‘dry_no pumping’, ‘dry_current development’, ‘dry_maximum allocation’, ‘wet_no pumping’, wet_current development’, ‘wet_maximum allocation’, ‘med_no pumping’, ‘med_current
development’ and ‘med_maximum allocation’) were applied from the end of the calibration period (July 2008), finishing at June, 2108.
5.1 Scenario water balance
Scenario results are provided in Figures 5-1 to 5-3. These diagrams show water balance components (GL/yr) averaged over the 100 year period.
The major differences in the dry, wet and medium scenarios relate to groundwater pumping.
Comparison of the ‘dry_current development’ with ‘dry_maximum allocation’ scenario result show river leakage is greater by 5 GL/yr and evapotranspiration deplete from 138 to 120 GL/yr. The ‘dry_no
pumping’ scenario shows that evapotranspiration was increased to 171 GL/yr and net river leakage decreased from 100 GL/yr to 62 GL/yr (Figure 5.1). For the wet scenario recharge (rainfall+flood+irrigation) is 146 and net river leakage is 106 GL/yr in wet_max_allocation scenario,
48| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
however in the wet current development river net leakage declined to 101 and evapotranspiration rose up to 178 GL/yr. Wet no pumping scenario net river leakage is 67 GL/yr in Figure 5.2.
These illustrate that if there was no pumping in the region, water levels would have risen causing river
leakage to decrease and evapotranspiration to increase. If there was high pumping, water level would have depleted causing evapotranspiration to decrease and river leakage to increase.
Evapotranspiration is the dominant discharge process over each scenario run.
In the early stages of each scenario run, it was noted that some of the bores failed to maintain the pumping rates specified in the model and as a result of those pumping locations became dry (as shown in Figures 5-4 to 5-6). Water levels in these areas can exhibit gradually declining trends. In the
dry, wet and med scenarios with the maximum allocation, the groundwater system reaches a new equilibrium after year 55 and the system maintains groundwater pumping rates at approximately 96-99 GL/yr.
Net river leakages over the one hundred year period from 1895 to 1995 in each scenario are shown in Figure 5-7 to 5-9. As expected river leakage increases with pumping in all three scenarios.
49| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
50| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 5-1 Average Annual water balance over dry scenario run June 2008 to July 2108
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well108 78 16 171 0
CH GL/yr2 storage In 186
storage Out 189
Dry_No_Pumping
Dry_Current_Development
Dry_Max_Entitlements
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well108 98 3 138 69
CH GL/yr2 storage In 206
storage Out 212
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well
107 103 3 120 102
CH GL/yr2 storage In 210
storage Out 226
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
51| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 5-2 Average Annual water balance over medium scenario run June 2008 to July 2108
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well127 82 17 192 0
CH GL/yr2 storage In 209
storage Out 212
Medium_No_Pumping
Medium_Current_Development
Medium_Max Entitlements
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well126 103 4 157 70
CH GL/yr2 storage In 230
storage Out 233
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well
126 107 3 137 104
CH GL/yr2 storage In 233
storage Out 247
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
52| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 5-3 Average Annual water balance over wet scenario run June 2008 to July 2108
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well147 85 18 214 0
CH3 G
storage In 231storage Out 234
L/yr
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well147 105 4 178 70
CH3 GL/yr
storage In 252storage Out 255
Rain+Flood+Irr Riv in Riv out ET Well146 110 4 156 104
CH3 GL/yr
storage In 256storage Out 267
Wet_No_Pumping
Wet_current_Development
Wet_Max_Entitlements
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 5-4 Dry Scenario yearly groundwater extractions over the 100 year simulation
Dry Scenario
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
yr
ML
/yr
dry_current_develop_ML/yr pump_dry_max_allocation
Figure 5-5 Med Scenario yearly groundwater extractions over the 100 year simulation
Mid Scenario
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
yr
ML
/yr
pump_mid_current_develop pump_mid_max_allocation
53| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 5-6 Wet Scenario yearly groundwater extractions over the 100 year simulation
Wet Scenario
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
yr
ML
/yr
pump_w et_current_devel pumping_w et_max_allocation
Figure 5-7 Dry Scenario yearly net river leakage over the 100 year simulation
Dry River Net
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
yr
Riv
er L
eaka
ge
Net
M
L/y
r
dry_current_develop_ML/yr Riv Net_dry_max_allocation dry_nopuming_RivNet ML/yr
54| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 5-8 Mid Scenario yearly net river leakage over the 100 year simulation
Med River Net
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
yr
Riv
er L
eaka
ge
Net
tM
L/y
r
Riv Net_mid_current_develop Riv Net_mid_max_allocation RivNet_mid_nopumping
Figure 5-9 Wet Scenario yearly net river leakage over the 100 year simulation
Wet River Net
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
yr
Riv
er L
eaka
ge
Net
t M
L/y
r
RivNet_w et_current_develop RivNet_w et_max_allocation RivNet_w et_nopumping
55| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
6. Conclusions and recommendations
A groundwater flow model for the Upper Lachlan Valley has been developed to improve the
understanding of the regional flow system, assess the quantity of water within the system and the amount of recharge to the aquifer and to evaluate the impact of climate change on the water balance for the regional aquifers within the valley.
The model was developed using MODFLOW (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) with a non uniform grid for this study. Grid cell dimensions vary from 500 m in the vicinity of the Lachlan River and increase progressively to 2000 m at distance from the river to the north and south. The model grid is rotated 20
degrees anti clockwise. The model calibration period is July 1986 to June 2008. The model consists of four layers that correspond to each of the major aquifers:
Layer 1: the unconfined Upper Cowra
Layer 2: the confined/unconfined Lower Cowra
Layer 3 the confined/unconfined Lachlan Formation
Layer 4 the confined/unconfined fractured rock (inactive layer)
The groundwater flow model identified the main recharge components as rainfall recharge, river leakage, flood recharge and irrigation recharge, whilst evapotranspiration is the major discharge component followed by groundwater usage. The aquifer outflow is to the west.
Non linear parameter estimation (PEST) was used to aid calibration of the model based on water levels from observation bores. Assessment of the model’s performance, based on comparison between observed and simulated groundwater levels for the entire calibration period, indicates that, for
all model layers, a good match was generally achieved except in zone 7. Low SRMS (scaled root mean square) values (less than 5%) were achieved for all three layers which confirm that the model is well calibrated.
This groundwater model simulates monthly stress periods and requires usage data at a monthly frequency. However from 1998 onwards groundwater usage data in the model have only annual frequency. There is little usage data available prior to 1998. This shortcoming in the groundwater
usage data set constrained the model calibration in some cases.
The water balance summary for the 22 year period of the model (July 1986 to June 2008) shows an annual average total recharge of 186.48GL. This figure represents an average over the model spatial
domain and calibration period. It is not representative of recent conditions and takes no account of spatial variability. In practice, pumping is concentrated in small areas and has increased significantly in recent years. This pattern of usage is likely to affect local water levels and may diminish local
extraction potential unless sufficient recovery occurs. The model will be of value in investigate local usage scenarios. The total annual average outflow is 156.30 GL. The evapotranspiration is about 76% of this total. Therefore evapotranspiration is the dominant output over the calibration period.
Three climate scenarios (dry, wet and med) were undertaken to evaluate the aquifer’s response to different levels of groundwater pumping. The ‘no pumping scenario’ water budget revealed the likelihood of rising water levels, reduced river leakage and increased evapotranspiration in the
absence of pumping for all climatic scenarios. The increased pumping scenario showed, water level depleted causing evapotranspiration to decrease and river leakage to increase in all scenarios.
56| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
It is recommended in future attempts to revise this model the following aspects are given consideration:
Poor calibration of bores in Zone 7 is attributed to the complexity of the groundwater system
in this area. More geological investigations are needed to obtain a proper understanding of the hydrogeological framework of the area.
Review the hydrogeological framework of the alluvial’s in zone 1 and 2.
Independent studies of the groundwater recharge process (for example, hydrochemical characterisation) could enhance calibration of the groundwater model particularly Zone 1, 2
and 7.
Annual monitoring of groundwater production bores constrains the integrity of groundwater usage data. The requirement for monthly usage data for groundwater modelling purposes
necessitates assumptions regarding temporal distribution of production. Therefore, it is recommended that, particularly in critical areas of groundwater usage, selected landholders be requested to provide monthly meter readings of production with additional data such as
pumping on/off times and a log of associated management decisions.
Some discrepancies between observed bore data and corresponding model-simulated data are attributed to the likelihood that a few existing groundwater extraction sites are not
represented in the model. Future model enhancement should seek to assess the veracity of this suspected cause.
Improved estimate of irrigation recharge based on landuse, crop patterns and combined
usage of surface and groundwater.
Verification of this model has not been undertaken. Since almost all suitable observation data
sets were used to calibrate this model, spatial verification is not possible. However, temporal verification remains an available option at a future time since over two years of observation data have accumulated since the end of the calibration period of this model.
57| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
58| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
7. References
Anderson, J., Gates. G., and Mount, T.J., 1993. Hydrogeology of the Jemalong and Wyldes Plains
Irrigation Districts, NSW Department of Water Resources.
Barnett, B.G and Muller, J., 2008. Upper Lachlan Groundwater Model calibration Report Draft, SKM Bilge, H., 2001, Lower Gwydir Valley Groundwater Model, CNR, Department of Land and Water Conservation
Bilge, H., 2007, Lower Macquarie Groundwater Flow Model, Water Management Division,
Department of Water and Energy
Bish, S. and Gates, G., 1991. Groundwater reconnaissance survey: Forbes – Condobolin-Lake Cargelligi, NSW Dept. Water Resources, T.S.91.033. Chiang, W. H. and W. Kinzelbach. 1996. Processing Modflow (PM), Pre- and postprocessors for the simulation of flow and contaminant transport in groundwater system with MODFLOW.
Coffey 2006. Cowal Gold Mine Groundwater Supply Modelling Study Model Calibraion, Coffey Geosciences Pty. Ltd. S21910/02
Dawes WR, Stauffacher M. and Walker GR. 2000. Calibration of Modelling of groundwater process in
the Liverpool Plains. CSIRO Land and Water Technical report 5/00. February
Demetriou, C., 1995b, Computer program VMRIVER - pre-processor for time varying river in MODFLOW Format, CNR, Department of Land and Water Conservation.
Doherty, J., 2005, PEST Model-Independent Parameter Estimation User Manual (5th edition). DWR. 1994. Review of Groundwater Use and Water Level Behaviour in the Upper Lachlan Valley 1986-1994, Status Report No. 2. Department of Water Resources Technical Services Division TS 94.078 authored by S Bish and R.M Williams Hydrogeology Unit.
Gates, G.W.B and Williams, R.M., 1988. Dryland salinity study: Changes in groundwater levels southeast NSW, NSW Dept. Water Resources, T.S. 88.010.
McDonald, M.G and Harbaugh A.W., 1988, A modular three- dimensional finite difference groundwater
flow model. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Megalla, M.N and Kalf F.R.P., 1973. buried Channel of the Lachlan from Cowra to Forbes, NSW, Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission NSW
Merrick, N.P. 1989, Lower Namoi Valley Groundwater Model. Department of Water Resources, Heritage Computing.
Murray Basin Hydrogeological Map Series CARGELLIGO scale 1:250 000
Middlemis, H., Merrick, N. P. & Ross, J. 2001, Groundwater flow modelling guideline, Aquaterra Consulting Pty Ltd Report for Murray Darling Basin Commission, Project no. 125, January 2001.
Muller, R. and Lennox, G., 1999. Review of Groundwater trends in the Lachlan Valley Upstream of
Lake Cargelligo, Central West Region CW GWS 99/1
O’Rourke, M., 2007. Upper Lachlan Groundwater Source Status Report 2007.
Salotti, D., 1997, Borambil Creek Groundwater Model. Department of Land of Water Conservation.
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
APPENDIX 1: Model geometry
Ground Surface Elevation (m AHD)
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
59| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Layer1 thickness (m)
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
20
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
UPPER COWRA THICKNESS
5
12
15
20
60| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Layer 2 thickness (m)
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
LOWER COWRA THICKNESS
0
10
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
61| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Layer 3 thickness (m)
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
0
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LACHLAN THICKNESS
62| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
APPENDIX 2: Initial head
Upper Cowra Initial Heads July 1986 (m) 1986
63| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
64| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Lower Cowra Initial Heads July 1986 (m) (AHD)
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
LOWER COWRA INITIAL HEAD JULY 1986 (m) (AHD)
130
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
390
410
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Lachlan Formation Initial Heads July 1986 (m) (AHD)
450000 500000 550000 600000 650000
6200000
6250000
6300000
6350000
Forbes
Parkes
CowraGrenfell
Condobolin
West Wyalong
Temora
Lake Cargelligo
LACHLAN FORMATION INITIAL HEAD JULY 1986 (m) (AHD)
130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360
65| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
APPENDIX 3: Production bore locations Table List of Usage Bores
No Licence No Easting Northing No Licence N Easting Northing No Licence No Easting Northing No Licence Easting Northing No Licence Easting Northing No Licence Easting Northing1 70BL003286 653152 6258438 74 70BL128649 602418 6302001 147 70BL226902 579022 6303271 220 70BL11748 638343 6280887 293 70BL22730 529238 6323085 366 70BL23021 539783 62787512 70BL003287 650539 6257524 75 70BL128752 655062 6255696 148 70BL226940 612179 6299359 221 70BL12015 653455 6285454 294 70BL22732 531313 6322685 367 70BL23022 539784 62787523 70BL003292 652985 6259273 76 70BL130274 644903 6267409 149 70BL226958 640438 6281018 222 70BL12027 646803 6281480 295 70BL22734 590709 6303917 368 70BL23022 539794 62787544 70BL004285 652060 6256279 77 70BL130276 645105 6267191 150 70BL226959 639857 6280327 223 70BL12327 652929 6284816 296 70BL22736 536864 6316173 369 70BL23022 539786 62787645 70BL004286 652209 6257078 78 70BL130933 640309 6275108 151 70BL227008 657260 6254453 224 70BL12403 561863 6306314 297 70BL22738 553145 6306233 370 70BL23022 537234 62783516 70BL004294 650310 6257651 79 70BL131104 597999 6307094 152 70BL227009 650098 6253424 225 70BL12508 648698 6281370 298 70BL22738 517382 6335720 371 70BL23022 537235 62783527 70BL005203 637980 6226843 80 70BL131459 603077 6300187 153 70BL227019 573603 6304106 226 70BL12605 651528 6284252 299 70BL22739 522298 6330239 372 70BL23022 537236 62783538 70BL005889 653154 6257101 81 70BL133693 645155 6259586 154 70BL227046 593703 6293614 227 70BL12605 651601 6284005 300 70BL22740 592534 6288574 373 70BL23033 599986 62984249 70BL010324 651153 6255538 82 70BL133695 648703 6263647 155 70BL227087 579703 6302854 228 70BL12641 547180 6268021 301 70BL22740 595581 6294266 374 70BL23037 632206 6279828
10 70BL010764 653202 6258345 83 70BL133701 644563 6267076 156 70BL227122 647127 6255795 229 70BL12673 646435 6281805 302 70BL22740 599702 6296727 375 70BL23066 575328 622471911 70BL013352 647971 6262710 84 70BL133702 646004 6267054 157 70BL227193 596313 6304259 230 70BL12746 647754 6282031 303 70BL22741 585759 6299832 376 70BL23066 517258 632383012 70BL013672 645703 6275575 85 70BL133703 645486 6266815 158 70BL227194 627337 6288053 231 70BL12808 659567 6285355 304 70BL22741 583399 6295939 377 70BL23078 545827 631962013 70BL013842 647096 6270803 86 70BL134615 633894 6277274 159 70BL227202 652903 6255264 232 70BL12859 651168 6284320 305 70BL22742 598208 6292782 378 70BL23085 645975 627363114 70BL014704 590451 6289734 87 70BL135032 647510 6260555 160 70BL227203 650903 6255285 233 70BL13029 654789 6284103 306 70BL22742 594283 6303115 379 70BL23086 587828 630241115 70BL015166 589192 6288606 88 70BL136431 611699 6301000 161 70BL227204 644915 6266485 234 70BL13050 654963 6285720 307 70BL22747 535028 6320366 380 70BL23086 582752 630329416 70BL015982 595264 6297511 89 70BL136510 650162 6255978 162 70BL227235 625813 6290659 235 70BL13160 649897 6281706 308 70BL22750 566055 6309551 381 70BL23104 590441 628973417 70BL016227 651084 6255169 90 70BL137567 572863 6304891 163 70BL227250 643145 6281900 236 70BL13293 510969 6335271 309 70BL22751 560749 6301580 382 70BL23116 628294 630053018 70BL016471 650913 6255285 91 70BL139872 647975 6259519 164 70BL227337 660754 6251657 237 70BL13328 649112 6281486 310 70BL22751 566971 6306590 383 70BL23130 605759 629893619 70BL016764 612239 6300387 92 70BL140178 647252 6272803 165 70BL227449 649013 6251184 238 70BL13369 651571 6260928 311 70BL22754 658485 6283894 384 70BL23136 656481 628275620 70BL017218 645041 6274691 93 70BL141326 645276 6276384 166 70BL227476 591363 6296585 239 70BL13498 631383 6280253 312 70BL22760 513348 6333215 385 70BL23187 557128 624047521 70BL017575 644483 6280571 94 70BL141778 639871 6284306 167 70BL227590 635187 6279474 240 70BL13626 649173 6282102 313 70BL22763 545469 6314259 386 70BL23208 629155 628175822 70BL018017 589435 6300862 95 70BL142074 645073 6273229 168 70BL227745 620109 6296835 241 70BL13630 648627 6281833 314 70BL22764 647352 6273627 387 70BL23209 545752 630818323 70BL018426 650757 6256242 96 70BL142332 647248 6272607 169 70BL227764 642613 6281084 242 70BL13669 557074 6313207 315 70BL22766 546787 6313090 388 70BL23224 607287 630173024 70BL018492 634477 6279391 97 70BL142423 642963 6281709 170 70BL228186 647071 6276939 243 70BL13986 648201 6280946 316 70BL22772 570229 630329125 70BL018543 647483 6257110 98 70BL144990 631373 6279284 171 70BL228233 645591 6275847 244 70BL14094 568658 6309995 317 70BL22772 569931 630273126 70BL019024 581989 6296924 99 70BL154311 645954 6276142 172 70BL228237 646531 6258755 245 70BL14236 627113 6299859 318 70BL22789 643495 627868527 70BL019065 645069 6280131 100 70BL154603 653935 6255991 173 70BL228239 611726 6302104 246 70BL14316 545565 6318600 319 70BL22819 519688 633309028 70BL019113 644313 6267542 101 70BL226068 623014 6299076 174 70BL228247 650238 6255683 247 70BL14350 566700 6303532 320 70BL22826 628601 628272929 70BL019484 644731 6279890 102 70BL226079 646581 6260918 175 70BL228248 645820 6261573 248 70BL15114 572356 6306672 321 70BL22834 628668 630191030 70BL019485 644894 6279795 103 70BL226152 597923 6293934 176 70BL228281 646580 6259413 249 70BL15114 571896 6307322 322 70BL22845 570660 630398331 70BL019676 578921 6316384 104 70BL226153 597913 6293934 177 70BL228467 647071 6276979 250 70BL15191 607539 6304052 323 70BL22851 517372 633572032 70BL020089 597284 6301723 105 70BL226208 608913 6301634 178 70BL228512 646823 6261415 251 70BL15192 608021 6303863 324 70BL22852 609724 622598233 70BL020169 597761 6306681 106 70BL226238 640000 6284273 179 70BL228847 648265 6269866 252 70BL15365 609323 6225894 325 70BL22852 609313 622589434 70BL020229 585381 6297016 107 70BL226271 630875 6280484 180 70BL229254 611329 6302511 253 70BL15385 631406 6280244 326 70BL22863 570284 630249135 70BL020463 642473 6280632 108 70BL226294 627245 6283095 181 70BL229327 639959 6228940 254 70BL15454 609734 6225982 327 70BL22868 606608 630380236 70BL020892 645864 6261734 109 70BL226330 643368 6280095 182 70BL229341 647989 6256878 255 70BL15485 651576 6254632 328 70BL22870 536408 632144037 70BL022423 640029 6230202 110 70BL226362 613529 6298914 183 70BL229342 647473 6257110 256 70BL22600 607103 6304264 329 70BL22886 557158 624047238 70BL022749 627308 6285897 111 70BL226385 646592 6262173 184 70BL229451 645129 6280127 257 70BL22618 571963 6309485 330 70BL22894 568000 630598439 70BL023104 647454 6274225 112 70BL226386 650229 6255773 185 70BL229490 645161 6259584 258 70BL22619 553751 6314540 331 70BL22918 514965 633754140 70BL023683 596956 6306642 113 70BL226407 651466 6256101 186 70BL229528 599258 6297733 259 70BL22622 559264 6316435 332 70BL22919 571501 630471241 70BL023791 602006 6295409 114 70BL226470 647999 6256878 187 70BL229532 640455 6283962 260 70BL22622 564214 6309385 333 70BL22924 552408 628273642 70BL030172 599346 6297747 115 70BL226492 644903 6277868 188 70BL229627 660740 6251663 261 70BL22623 545012 6265729 334 70BL22924 555360 628367843 70BL030536 647623 6270706 116 70BL226498 646482 6275654 189 70BL229700 611707 6300985 262 70BL22624 571863 6308935 335 70BL22925 553071 628563544 70BL030726 602121 6300117 117 70BL226501 648310 6269854 190 70BL229813 647368 6261203 263 70BL22624 571813 6308485 336 70BL22925 553276 628738645 70BL030780 622035 6296644 118 70BL226517 639676 6277962 191 70BL229898 654253 6255624 264 70BL22624 571763 6308135 337 70BL22933 572027 630743946 70BL030836 647781 6260081 119 70BL226518 646532 6258760 192 70BL229983 637212 6280244 265 70BL22624 571713 6307685 338 70BL22933 568763 630578447 70BL030968 640120 6231187 120 70BL226520 647499 6273454 193 70BL230075 644884 6279795 266 70BL22624 571563 6307035 339 70BL22936 530744 632531748 70BL031238 626406 6283969 121 70BL226534 646963 6277534 194 70BL230293 645708 6275581 267 70BL22624 571513 6306485 340 70BL22940 633005 627908349 70BL100181 650986 6258134 122 70BL226535 646713 6277334 195 70BL230492 647283 6272794 268 70BL22638 539113 6317385 341 70BL22942 566671 630324850 70BL106460 589477 6294270 123 70BL226536 650091 6253626 196 70BL230614 597995 6307094 269 70BL22638 658363 6283784 342 70BL22943 574398 630295951 70BL108788 642934 6280410 124 70BL226542 627413 6286684 197 70BL230816 638037 6226896 270 70BL22638 582003 6304686 343 70BL22945 601865 629516052 70BL109839 597424 6306884 125 70BL226549 646208 6272154 198 70BL230919 641673 6280965 271 70BL22638 536874 6316173 344 70BL22951 648760 627043453 70BL109909 648633 6263757 126 70BL226550 609816 6303190 199 70BL231046 631363 6279284 272 70BL22639 572213 6306335 345 70BL22951 648455 627089754 70BL110815 591049 6296781 127 70BL226553 632233 6280034 200 70BL231260 642474 6280674 273 70BL22642 645641 6273473 346 70BL22952 542922 625967555 70BL110913 630911 6281536 128 70BL226573 605058 6324869 201 70BL016663 566772 6310008 274 70BL22659 657713 6284534 347 70BL22954 580585 630284256 70BL114815 647001 6261227 129 70BL226574 628678 6281505 202 70BL016836 567886 6310493 275 70BL22667 551914 6330435 348 70BL22970 650056 625844657 70BL117897 651630 6259818 130 70BL226576 575550 6302120 203 70BL017485 570239 6303331 276 70BL22668 567297 6304330 349 70BL22981 640266 628025058 70BL119764 604267 6299143 131 70BL226600 603359 6305853 204 70BL017550 565502 6301885 277 70BL22673 622641 6294821 350 70BL22989 600614 629804259 70BL119765 604445 6298925 132 70BL226639 646735 6258397 205 70BL018355 545962 6304123 278 70BL22673 661723 6287752 351 70BL22996 649404 625168760 70BL120184 621536 6292441 133 70BL226659 602262 6299749 206 70BL018408 616295 6243494 279 70BL22674 595913 6295335 352 70BL23018 544575 630181861 70BL120393 636567 6279510 134 70BL226681 601394 6298557 207 70BL018741 570284 6302499 280 70BL22675 641173 6280184 353 70BL23020 537622 627843662 70BL120435 644894 6266855 135 70BL226682 611381 6302544 208 70BL020435 653558 6285422 281 70BL22675 566164 6309770 354 70BL23020 539785 627875363 70BL122854 641678 6280921 136 70BL226718 650153 6255144 209 70BL021447 655112 6284195 282 70BL22681 553918 6316081 355 70BL23020 539787 627875564 70BL124101 647037 6258908 137 70BL226742 620493 6297078 210 70BL021616 547041 6267503 283 70BL22681 556459 6315898 356 70BL23020 539789 627875765 70BL124304 645714 6268102 138 70BL226758 628700 6282420 211 70BL021711 647113 6280593 284 70BL22683 552731 6266198 357 70BL23020 539791 627875966 70BL126144 604425 6299511 139 70BL226771 647794 6256334 212 70BL022434 653705 6284957 285 70BL22685 627313 6300309 358 70BL23021 539793 627875167 70BL126171 607214 6301760 140 70BL226789 605962 6303098 213 70BL023260 645716 6273497 286 70BL22698 627890 6300646 359 70BL23021 539567 627767368 70BL126314 597501 6296595 141 70BL226798 628668 6281505 214 70BL030845 566826 6310408 287 70BL22699 529702 6327246 360 70BL23021 539569 627767569 70BL127432 640933 6281086 142 70BL226799 628113 6281234 215 70BL102023 568664 6310764 288 70BL22705 626701 6291204 361 70BL23021 539571 627767670 70BL127699 622190 6293111 143 70BL226862 649913 6255034 216 70BL105679 600624 6298042 289 70BL22707 599109 6295678 362 70BL23021 539573 627767771 70BL128015 643362 6281482 144 70BL226870 650170 6259292 217 70BL107196 629070 6299983 290 70BL22714 656491 6282756 363 70BL23021 539575 627767872 70BL128502 648149 6269259 145 70BL226873 649853 6257514 218 70BL108949 606629 6303811 291 70BL22723 554228 6302728 364 70BL23021 539577 627767973 70BL128554 637209 6280247 146 70BL226876 647655 6256235 219 70BL108950 606587 6304527 292 70BL22725 527063 6324235 365 70BL23021 539579 6277681
66| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
APPENDIX 4: River details
River Gauging station and weirs in the model area
380000 400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 540000 560000 580000 600000 620000 640000 660000 680000
6120000
6140000
6160000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
6380000
6400000
412006
412011
412030
412033
412165
412030 412139
412002
412057
412036
412024
412004
412009
412016
412023
412067
412072
412043
412072
weir
weirweir
67| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
River stage data for each gauging station
River Levels
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Feb
-80
Feb
-81
Feb
-82
Feb
-83
Feb
-84
Feb
-85
Feb
-86
Feb
-87
Feb
-88
Feb
-89
Feb
-90
Feb
-91
Feb
-92
Feb
-93
Feb
-94
Feb
-95
Feb
-96
Feb
-97
Feb
-98
Feb
-99
Feb
-00
Feb
-01
Feb
-02
Feb
-03
Feb
-04
Feb
-05
Feb
-06
Feb
-07
Date
Sta
ge
Hei
gh
t
r_412067
r_412002
r_412057
r_412004
r_412036
r_412006
r_412011
68| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
APPENDIX 5: Monitoring bore locations and model layer boundaries
Upper Cowra model boundaries and bore locations
69| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 540000 560000 580000 600000 620000 640000 660000 6800006160000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
6380000
GW036174_1GW036176_1
GW036502_1
GW036524_1
GW036528_1GW036554_1
GW036563_1
GW036594_1
GW021304_1GW021305_1GW021306_1GW021307_1
GW025030_1GW025103_1
GW025151_1GW025155_2GW025163_1
GW025166_1GW025167_2GW025168_1
GW030312_1GW030313_2GW030315_1
GW030365_1
GW030368_1
GW030371_1
GW030388_1
GW030467_1
GW030484_1
GW030486_1GW030487_1GW030488_1
GW030495_1GW036028_1
GW036030_1
GW036080_1
GW036082_1GW036083_1
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Lower Cowra model boundaries and bore locations
400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 540000 560000 580000 600000 620000 640000 660000 6800006160000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
6380000
GW030252_1GW030270_1
GW036089_1
GW036091_1
GW036174_2GW036175_1
GW036176_2
GW036177_1
GW036487_1
GW036500_1
GW036501_2
GW036502_2GW036522_2
GW036523_2
GW036527_1GW036528_3
GW036550_2
GW036551_2GW036552_2GW036554_3
GW036594_2
GW036595_1GW036596_2GW036597_1
GW036603_1GW036605_1
GW036610_1GW036613_1
GW036629_1
GW036700_1
GW036738_1GW036739_1
GW036741_1GW036776_1GW036777_2
GW036779_1
GW039379_1
GW014737_1
GW021165_1GW021301_1GW021302_1
GW021303_2GW021304_2
GW021305_2GW021306_2GW021307_2
GW025030_2GW025067_1GW025081_1GW025082_2
GW025102_1
GW025151_2GW025164_2GW025165_2
GW030247_1GW030249_1
GW030296_3
GW030314_1
GW030359_1
GW030361_1
GW030366_1GW030367_1
GW030369_1
GW030372_1GW030373_1
GW030374_1GW030376_1
GW030377_2
GW030482_1GW030483_2
GW030484_3
GW030485_3
GW030495_2
GW036029_2GW036030_2
GW036031_3
GW036079_1GW036080_2GW036081_1
GW036082_3
GW036083_3
GW036085_1
GW036086_1
GW036087_1
70| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
400000 420000 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 540000 560000 580000 600000 620000 640000 660000 6800006160000
6180000
6200000
6220000
6240000
6260000
6280000
6300000
6320000
6340000
6360000
6380000
GW036088_2GW036089_2GW036090_2
GW036171_2GW036174_3GW036175_3
GW036487_3
GW036500_2
GW036502_3
GW036523_3
GW036526_2
GW036527_4
GW036550_3
GW036552_3
GW036553_1
GW036597_2
GW036604_1GW036606_1
GW036609_1
GW036611_1
GW036627_1
GW036632_1
GW036741_3GW036777_3
GW036779_2
GW039378_1
GW021165_2
GW025030_3GW025067_2
GW025151_3GW025155_3GW025164_4GW025165_3
GW030246_2GW030247_2GW030248_1GW030249_3GW030314_2GW030315_2
GW030359_3
GW030365_2GW030367_2
GW030368_2GW030369_2
GW030370_2
GW030372_3GW030373_4
GW030374_3
GW030377_4
GW030388_2
GW030483_4
GW030484_5
GW030485_4
GW036079_5GW036080_3GW036081_3
GW036087_3
Lachlan Formation model boundaries and bore locations
71| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
72| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
APPENDIX 6: Observed and simulated water level hydrographs
Figure 6-1 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 6 (m) (AHD
30365
30368
30315
L1_Z6
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
300
301
302
303
304
305
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
270
272
274
276
278
280
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
266
268
270
272
274
276
278
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
256
258
260
262
264
266
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
264
266
268
270
272
274
276
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30371
30388
++++ Observed------- calibration
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
73| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-2 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 2 & 3 (m) (AHD
30312_1
36502_130484_1
30495_1
L1_Zone(2&3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
254
256
258
260
262
264
266
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
256
258
260
262
264
266
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
232
236
240
244
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
224
228
232
236
240
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
230
232
234
236
238
240
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
230
232
234
236
238
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30467_1
30313_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
74| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-3 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 3 (m) (AHD
30487_1
30486_136028_1
30495_1
L1_Zone(3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
228
230
232
234
236
238
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
228
230
232
234
236
238
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
226
228
230
232
234
236
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
224
226
228
230
232
234
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
220
222
224
226
228
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
230
232
234
236
238
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36030 _1
30488_1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
75| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-4 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
36082_1
36083_1 36554_1
25168_1
L1_Zone(5)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
208
212
216
220
224
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
208
210
212
214
216
218
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
204
208
212
216
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
202
204
206
208
210
212
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
203
204
205
206
207
208
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
198
200
202
204
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36528_1
36080_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
76| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-5 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
25166_1
36563_1 25151_1
L1_Zone(5)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
196
198
200
202
204
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
196
198
200
202
204
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
198
200
202
204
206
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
192
194
196
198
200
202Ja
n-88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
192
194
196
198
200
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
25155_2
25167_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
77| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-6 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
25030_1
21307_130484_1
L1_Zone(5)_Part(3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
184
186
188
190
192
194
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
184
186
188
190
192
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
224
228
232
236
240Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
25103_1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
78| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-7 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 6 (m) (AHD
36524_1
L1_Zone(7)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
198
200
202
204
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
198
199
200
201
202
203
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36594 _1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
79| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-8 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 1 in Zone 8 (m) (AHD
21305_1
21306_1
36176_1
L1_Zone(8)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
181
182
183
184
185
186
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
182
183
184
185
186
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
159
160
161
162
163
164Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
158
159
160
161
162
163
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36174 _1
21304_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
80| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-9 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 2 (m) (AHD
36500_1
30367_1
36501_2
30359_1
L2_Zone(2)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
270
272
274
276
278
280
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
260
264
268
272
276
280
284
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
266
268
270
272
274
276
278
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
260
264
268
272
276
280Ja
n-88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
266
268
270
272
274
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
256
260
264
268
272
276
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
30369_1
30366_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
81| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-10 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 2 (m) (AHD
14737_1
30296_3
30247_1
30361_1
L2_Zone(2)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
252
256
260
264
268
272
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
264
266
268
270
272
274
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
263
264
265
266
267
268
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
252
256
260
264
268Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
256
258
260
262
264
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
256
258
260
262
264
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30314_1
30249_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
82| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-11 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 2&3 (m) (AHD
36487_1
30373_1 30374_1
30377_2
L2_Z(2&3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
252
254
256
258
260
He
ad
(m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
250
252
254
256
258
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
250
252
254
256
258
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
240
244
248
252
256Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
240
242
244
246
248
250
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
228
232
236
240
244
248
252
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30376 _1
30372_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
83| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-12 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 3 (m) (AHD
36502_2
30484_330482_1
30495_2
L2_Zone(3)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
220
225
230
235
240
245
Hea
d (m
AH
D)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
220
224
228
232
236
240
244
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
216
220
224
228
232
236
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
228
232
236
240Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
210
220
230
240
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
228
230
232
234
236
238
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30485_3
30483_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
84| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-13 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 3 (m) (AHD
36030_2
36031_336522_2
36079_1
L2_Zone(3)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
218
220
222
224
226
228
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
220
222
224
226
228
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
216
218
220
222
224
226
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
216
218
220
222
224
226
228Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
216
220
224
228
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
214
216
218
220
222
224
226
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36527_1
36029_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
85| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-14 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
36082_3
36081_1 36083_3
36085_1
L2_Zone(5)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
208
212
216
220
224
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
208
210
212
214
216
218
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
204
208
212
216
220
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
204
208
212
216Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
202
204
206
208
210
212
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
202
204
206
208
210
212
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36554_3
36080_2
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
86| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-15 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
36523_2
36552_236089_1
36551_2
L2_Zone(5)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
202
204
206
208
210
212
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
196
200
204
208
212
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
192
196
200
204
208
212
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
198
200
202
204
206
208Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
198
200
202
204
206
208
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
188
192
196
200
204
208
212
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36087_1
36086_1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
87| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-16 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
36550_2
25165_2 25164_2
36091_1
L2_Zone(5)_Part(3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
188
192
196
200
204
208
212
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
196
198
200
202
204
206
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
184
188
192
196
200
204
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
180
184
188
192
196
200
204Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
194
196
198
200
202
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
25151_2
36528_3
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
88| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-17 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
25030_2
25067_125081_1
L2_Zone(5)_Part(4)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
182
184
186
188
190
192
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
184
186
188
190
192
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
184
186
188
190
192Ja
n-8
8
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
176
180
184
188
192
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
25082_2
25102_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
89| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-18 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 7 (m) (AHD
36738_1
36739_1
L2_Zone(7)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
228
232
236
240
244
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
244
248
252
256
260
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
268
272
276
280
284
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
36779_1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
256
260
264
268
272
276
280
Hea
d (m
AH
D)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
200
204
208
212
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
36777_2
30252_1
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
224
228
232
236
240
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
36741_1
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
90| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-19 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 7 (m) (AHD
39379_1
36603_136605_1
36596_2
L2_Zone(7)_Part(3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
204
206
208
210
212
214
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
188
192
196
200
204
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
184
188
192
196
200
204Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
197
198
199
200
201
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
160
170
180
190
200
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
36700_1
36629_1
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
91| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-20 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 7 (m) (AHD
36595_1
36597_136613_1
L2_Zone(7)_Part(4)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
184
188
192
196
200
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
196
197
198
199
200
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
150
160
170
180
190
200
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
197
198
199
200Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
198
200
202
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36594_2
36610_1
++++ Observed------- Model
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
204
208
212
216
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30270_1
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
92| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-21 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 8 (m) (AHD
21302_1
21303_221304_2
21306_2
L2_Zone(8)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
178
180
182
184
186
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
172
176
180
184
188
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
172
176
180
184
188
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
180
182
184
186Ja
n-8
8
Jan-9
0
Jan-9
2
Jan-9
4
Jan-9
6
Jan-9
8
Jan-0
0
Jan-0
2
Jan-0
4
Jan-0
6
Jan-0
8
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
181
182
183
184
185
186
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
21305_2
21301_1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
93| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-22 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 2 in Zone 8 (m) (AHD
21165_1
36175_1 36176_2
36177_1
L2_Zone(8)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
178
180
182
184
186
Hea
d (m
AH
D)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
176
178
180
182
184
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
160
162
164
166
168
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
159
160
161
162
163
164Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
158
159
160
161
162
163
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
148
150
152
154
156
158
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
36174_2
21307_2
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
94| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-23 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 2 (m) (AHD
30365_2
36500_230367_2
30369_2
L3_Zone(2)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
300
301
302
303
304
305
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
268
272
276
280
284
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
264
268
272
276
280
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
266
268
270
272
274
276
278
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
266
268
270
272
274
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
30368_2
30388_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
95| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-24 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 2 (m) (AHD
30359_3
30315_2
30249_3
30247_2
L3_Zone(2)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
260
264
268
272
276
Hea
d (m
AH
D)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
252
256
260
264
268
272
276
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
256
260
264
268
272
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
245
250
255
260
265
270Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
248
252
256
260
264
268
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30248_1
30370_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
96| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-25 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 3 (m) (AHD
30314_2
30372_3
36487_3
30374_3
L3_Zone(2)_Part(3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
248
252
256
260
264
268
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
252
254
256
258
260
262
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
244
248
252
256
260Ja
n-88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
244
248
252
256
260
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
230
235
240
245
250
255
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
30373_4
30246_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
97| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-26 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 3 (m) (AHD
30483_4
36502_330484_5
36527_4
L3_Zone(2)_Part(4)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
220
230
240
250
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
200
210
220
230
240
250
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
210
220
230
240
250
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
210
220
230
240
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
210
220
230
240
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
190
200
210
220
230
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
30485_4
30377_4
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
98| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-27 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
36080_3
36081_3
36523_3
36526_2
L3_Zone(5)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
190
200
210
220
230
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
204
208
212
216
220
224
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
200
204
208
212
216
220
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
180
185
190
195
200
205
210Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
185
190
195
200
205
210
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
200
204
208
212
216
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36552_3
36079_5
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
99| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-28 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
36087_3
36088_236550_3
25165_3
L3_Zone(5)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
188
192
196
200
204
208
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
188
192
196
200
204
208
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
188
192
196
200
204
208
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
198
200
202
204
206Ja
n-88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
170
180
190
200
210
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
160
170
180
190
200
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
36090_2
36089_2
++++ Observed------- Model
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
100| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-29 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 5 (m) (AHD
25151_3
25155_325067_2
L3_Zone(5)_Part(3)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
190
192
194
196
198
200
202
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
175
180
185
190
195
200
205
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
188
192
196
200
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
150
160
170
180
190Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
168
172
176
180
184
188
192
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
25030_3
25164_4
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
101| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-30 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 7 (m) (AHD
36777_3
39378_1
36741_3
L3_Zone(7)_Part(1)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
268
272
276
280
284
He
ad
(m A
HD
)
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
260
264
268
272
276
280
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
196
200
204
208
212
216Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
170
180
190
200
210
220
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
212
216
220
224
228
232
236
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36632_1
36779_2++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
102| NSW Office of Water, February 2012
Figure 6-31 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 7 (m) (AHD
36627_1
36604_136611_1
36609_1
L3_Zone(7)_Part(2)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
192
196
200
204
208
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
185
190
195
200
205
210
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
188
192
196
200
204
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
150
160
170
180
190
200Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
150
160
170
180
190
200
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
140
160
180
200
220
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
36597_2
36606_1
++++ Observed------- Model------- P Mdl
Upper Lachlan Groundwater Flow Model
Figure 6-32 Comparison between simulated and observed water levels in layer 3 in Zone 8 (m) (AHD
36175_3
36174_3
36553_1(Zone7)
L3_Zone(8)
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Time (days)
176
178
180
182
184
He
ad (
m A
HD
)
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Time (days)
158
160
162
164
166
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
158
159
160
161
162
163
Jan
-88
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
140
160
180
200
220Ja
n-8
8
Jan
-90
Jan
-92
Jan
-94
Jan
-96
Jan
-98
Jan
-00
Jan
-02
Jan
-04
Jan
-06
Jan
-08
21165_2
++++ Observed------- Model------- PMdl
103| NSW Office of Water, February 2012