usc student affairs assessment symposium dr. sonja g. daniels june 16, 2011
DESCRIPTION
USC Student Affairs Assessment Symposium Dr. Sonja G. Daniels June 16, 2011. Who are our International students? Review of study on International students from China and Hong Kong Implications for our programs and services supporting International students and their student experiences. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
+
USC Student Affairs Assessment SymposiumDr. Sonja G. DanielsJune 16, 2011
+Who are our International students?
Review of study on International students from China and Hong Kong Implications for our programs and services supporting International students and their student experiences
International Student DataInstitute of International Education Open Doors Report 2010
+Top U.S. Institutions
University of Southern California – 7,987
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign – 7,287
New York University – 7,276
Purdue University Main Campus – 6,903
Columbia University – 6,833
IIE Open Doors Report 2010
International Student DataIIE Open Doors Report 2010
Top Fields of Study Business and Management – 21.1 percent Engineering – 18.4 percent Physical and Life Sciences – 8.9 percent Math and Computer Science – 8.8 percent Social Sciences – 8.7 percent
Primary Source of Funding Personal and Family – 61.9 percent U.S. College or University – 24.1 percent Home Government or University – 4.6 percent
+Record high number of International students in the U.S. Chinese student enrollment increased 30 percent from 2009 report
Graduate enrollment up 4 percent and Undergraduate enrollment up 2 percent
Six percent increase of students in non-degree programs (certificate and exchanges, less for English language)
International students contribute 20 billion to U.S. economy
IEE Open Doors 2010
University of Southern California International Student Data
USC at a Glance
International Student Population
China – 28.1 %
India – 21.6 %
South Korea – 10.4 %
Taiwan – 6.8 %
Canada – 4.3%
Hong Kong – 2.8 %
+
The Diversity Course Project Faculty: Dr. Darnell Cole, Dr. Melora Sundt, Dr. Patricia Tobey Researchers: Emily Caviglia, Sonja Daniels, Mark Pearson, Matthew Nelson,
Wendy Stewart, Karen Ravago and Kevin Bolen
Diversity Course ProjectPurpose Is the diversity requirement meeting its intended goals?Is what we could count what we ought to count?How do we parse out “learning outcomes” in diversity courses?
+Diversity Course Project Project Components:
Diversity Course SyllabiDiversity Courses Typology Instructor and Course RatingsFaculty InterviewsStudent Focus Group InterviewsIndividual Student InterviewsInstitutional Surveys:
Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP),College Student Experience Questionnaire (CSEQ), Senior Survey
Transcript and Admissions DataCollegiate Learning Assessment (CLA): Online & In the
Classroom Diversity Survey
+ Study SiteWestern University (WU)
33,500 students, 16,500 undergraduate, 17,000 graduate
Tier one institution founded in the 1800s
45 %
25 %
14 %
7 %
6 % 51 %49 %
Diversity Course Typology
Five requirements of a diversity course:
1.Dimensions of human diversity2.1/3 of the course addresses diversity3.Personal reflection on students’ attitudes4.Syllabi reflect contemporary issues5.Analytical thinking about diversity
+
The Effect of Diversity Courses on International Students from China and Hong Kong: A Focus on Intergroup Peer Relationships
Importance of the Study
U.S. is the top destination for international students.
China represents the largest population of international students.
Contribute to the literature beyond transitional issues.
Understand how international students experience U.S. diversity.
Outcomes of diversity courses for international students.
Understand how diversity courses support intergroup peer relationship.
Research questionsHow do student perceptions of diversity courses contribute to students’ intergroup peer relationships?
How do student perceptions of intergroup peer relationships vary by students’ level of acculturation
Conceptual Framework Diversity Typology – Cole
and Sundt (2008) Introductory Basic Intermediate Advanced
Bennett’s (2001) Genres of Research in Multicultural Education Classroom climate Cultural styles in teaching
and learning
Intergroup Contact Hypothesis – Allport (1954) Conditions of: equal status
interactions, common goals, intergroup cooperation & support of authorities
Friendship Potential (Pettigrew, 1998)
Gurin, Dey, Hurtado and Gurin (2002) Informal Interactional and
Classroom Diversity
Acculturation Framework (Berry, 1980) Integration, separation,
assimilation and marginalization
Data Source
12 Student Participants
Years in School
Majors
Diversity Courses
Diversity & the Classical Western Tradition, Los Angeles & the American Dream, Social Problems, Minority Mental Health, Social Issues in Gender, Changing Family Forms, Social Inequity: Class, Status & Power and Sociology of Childhood
Acculturation Scale for Asian International Students (ASAIS) – Gu, Han and Hu, 2006
Key Themes from Student Interviews
1. Influence of media
What I know of the ethnicity of people in the U.S. would be from movies because that was my sole connection to the states not being here… and TV shows also.
-Brittany, Senior Psychology major from Hong Kong
2. Changing attitudes
He is very nice, and he changed my ideas to black people…With women I am ok but with Black guys I feel scared… but the guy from my discussion is very nice and before discussion I don’t talk to Black people… he just changed my mind about Blacks.
-Lisa, Senior Business major from China
1. Defining diversity
2. Prior U.S. diversity knowledge
3. Diversity course understanding
4. Intergroup peer relationships: Classroom related
5. Intergroup peer relationships: Intra/inter personal related
Key Themes from Student Interviews
Findings – Acculturation ScaleSubscale Mean Standar
dDeviation
CronbachAlpha
Min.Score
Max Score
Separation (8 Items)
33.08 9.37 .89 12 42
Integration(5 Items)
28.42 2.71 .51 25 33
Assimilation(8 Items)
27.67 11.91 .94 13 45
Marginalization(12 Items)
19.17 6.31 .79 12 29 Separated Group - China Students (4) changed to:
Assimilation, 35.75 M; 12.84 SD Integration, 29.75 M; 2.99 SD Separation, 25.5 M; 11.09 SD Marginalization, 22.25; 5.85 SD
Discussion Influence of the media on students prior knowledge and
significant knowledge about diversity provided by the courses (Cheung, 2001; Cheung, 1998)
Positive effects of diversity courses on students: Openness to cultural awareness, interest in racial understanding and reducing prejudice (Astin, 1993; Hurtado, 1996; Chang, 1999)
Significant peer interactions facilitated by group projects and assignments and the positive role of the TA (Allport 1954; Gurin, et al. 2002; Saenz, Ngai, & Hurtado, 2006)
Students more open to racial/ethnic groups, gays and lesbians, gender, religion and U.S. society diversity. Change in beliefs and stereotypes held prior from interactions with diverse peers: Diversity courses provide supportive environment to challenge values and
attitudes (Laird, Engberg, & Hurtado, 2005) Diversity courses support sociopolitical views and new ways of thinking about
human differences (Henderson-King & Stewart, 1999) Intergroup contact decreases intergroup bias (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2000)
Discussion General friendships - Some with domestics students; more
with Asian and Asian international students:
Friendship potential and stages of time (Pettigrew, 1998)
Interracial friendships occur in a close interpersonal environment (Antonio, 2001)
International students prefer friends who are from their own country or region of the world (Furnham & Alibhai, 1985)
Acculturation level supported student responses:
Depends on degree of adaptation with host and home country (Berry, 2003)
Depends on contact with domestic students (Frey & Roysicar, 2004)
For short duration, integration and marginalization not identified in international students (Chataway & Berry, 1989; Sodowsky & Plake, 1992)
Caution on Integration due to low Cronbach Alpha score
Implications
Support for international students taking diversity courses; choosing courses and advising
Changes to the classroom environment; smaller class sizes
Hands-on delivery of materials and teaching styles; training faculty on effective pedagogy to support students in diversity courses
Continued support for class projects and activities; use of media and popular culture to educate students
Challenge remains for international students to make friends with domestic students; preference for friends from own country or region
Future research on international student experiences such as leadership, involvement and service-learning to broaden scope of literature
Limitations
Focus on students only from China and Hong Kong – Broad diversity of International students
Small sample size of 12 students
Gender composition; only one male student
Western University’s campus environment, number of international students and domestic student racial/ethnic diversity
Specific Diversity requirement of Western University and Diversity Typology categorization
ASAIS: new instrument and small sample size
+Implications for Student Affairs Practice•Diversity education does not simply occur within the classroom. How can student affairs departments implement diversity interventions outside the classroom to benefit students? (i.e. training sessions, diversity retreats, crisis response to campus conflicts…)
How do we involve international students in these experiences?
•How do we encourage international students to engage in co-curricular experiences to support adjustment and building of peer relationships? How might this differ for an increasing number of graduate students?
Leadership opportunities, civic engagement, student organizations, mentoring, etc.
Open Question and Discussion Period