use of gwas and exome sequencing to identify genes relevant to drug-induced liver injury
DESCRIPTION
Use of GWAS and exome sequencing to identify genes relevant to drug-induced liver injury . Ann K. Daly Institute of Cellular Medicine Newcastle University. Idiosyncratic adverse drug reations. Serious health problem which is expensive for society Common cause of death - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Use of GWAS and exome sequencing to identify genes relevant to drug-induced liver injury
Ann K. DalyInstitute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle University
Idiosyncratic adverse drug reations Serious health problem which is expensive for society
Common cause of death Loss of new drugs late in development or soon after licensing
Typical incidence 1 in 10,000 to 100,000 patients exposed Local drug concentration may contribute but concentration-
independent effects important Contribution from immune system in many but not all cases
Examples Drug-induced liver injury Hypersensitivity reactions and skin rash Cardiotoxicity Muscle toxicity
Drug-induced toxicities associated with 28 drugs withdrawn from the US market 1976 to 2005
Wilke et al. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2007; 6, 904-916
Range of drugs give rise to idiosyncratic DILI but due to value of drugs and rarity of problem are still used widely
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) Rare but serious idiosyncratic toxicity Several phenotypes
Cholestatic Effects on bile secretion
Hepatocellular Inflammatory disease
Aims Develop strategies to prevent DILI reactions by genotyping
patients prior to treatment Develop screening approaches for use during drug
development
Aim: Find genes predisposing to DILI
Drugs Anti-TB medication or Flucloxacillin or Amoxicillin-clavulanate
Multicentre collaboration involving Newcastle, Liverpool, Nottingham and London
UK-wide recruitment of cases Retrospective and prospective
UK-wide study on drug-induced liver injury
Worldwide study on DILI genetics-Ann Daly and Guru Aithal-co-chairs
study
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) on flucloxacillin DILI
51 UK cases (DILIGEN study) and population control group (n=282)
Illumina IM chipNo previous genetic studies on this form of
DILIGWAS design allowed for an open study
Manhattan plot for flucloxacillin GWAS
MHC regionStrongest signal with SNP in HCP5 gene which tags HLA-B*57:01 Daly et al., Nature Genetics 2009; 41:816-822.
Flucloxacillin DILI and B*57:01 Association with HLA B*57:01 similar to that for
abacavir hypersensitivity 83% of 150 cases now studied are B*57:01-
positive No indication that other forms of DILI show this
particular association Sensitivity of B*57:01 genotyping lower as
predictor of flucloxacillin DILI than abacavir hypersensitivity
Other genetic and non-genetic risk factors may contribute
HLA genes-common thread in serious adverse drug reactions
HLA class I genes expressed on most cells Proteins present antigens
(particularly peptides) to CD8-positive cytotoxic T cells
A, B and C genes HLA class II genes expressed on
antigen presenting cells Proteins present antigens to T cells-
mainly CD4-positive T helper cells DR, DQ, DP genes
Amoxicillin-clavulanate-induced liver injury
Important cause of DILI worldwide Several small independent candidate gene
studies showed role for HLA class II DRB1*15:01 allele in susceptibility
GWAS involving international collaboration performed to identify additional risk factors
Amoxicillin-clavulanate DILI GWAS
MHC zoom-in, conditioned on the top SNP from class II (rs9274407)
rs2523822 (A*02:01)
MHC zoom-in
rs9274407rs3135388 (DRB1*15:01)
201 cases- UK DILIGEN (n=77), US DILIN (n=56), Spanish DILI (n=49), EUDRAGENE (n=19); 532 matched controls
MHC region
(Lucena et al., Gastroenterology 2011)
HLA typing and amoxicillin-clavulanate DILI
Detailed HLA typing performed on 177 cases and 219 controls
DRB1*15:01 and A*02:01 alleles associated independently with risk of DILI (OR approx. 2.5 for each)
Additional risk also seen from individual A*02:01 and DRB1*15:01 alleles (not on same haplotype)
If positive for both OR= 9.47 (3.67-24.5), p=2.56 x 10-7
Evidence for genetic interaction (p=0.0015)
HLA associations with DILI
Daly, Annual Review of Pharmacology & Toxicology 2012; 52:21-35
FlucloxacillinAbacavir
Clavulanic acid Lumiracoxib
LapatanibXimelagatran
DRB1*07:01-DQA1*02:01
DRB1*15:01
B*57:01
Chemical structures and HLA toxicity associations
HLA and related gene associations with DILI-underlying mechanism
Specific HLA protein interacts with drug or metabolite inappropriately
Triggers T-cell response Local cellular damage
Abacavir-B*57:01 interaction
From Illing et al., Nature 2012
Norcross et al., 2012; AIDS 26: F21-F29
Effect of different drugs on peptide binding in B*57:01-positive cell line
• No apparent direct effect by flucloxacillin unlike abacavir• Different mechanism for antigen presentation to abacavir?
Very recent findings suggest possible direct effect of flucloxacillin in some B*57:01-positive healthy volunteers
o No covalent adduct
Need to incubate with flucloxacillin for 24 to 48 hours to see cell proliferation
o Covalent adduct formedo Hapten mechanism likely
CD8-positive T cell clones from B*57:01-positive flucloxacillin DILI cases: response to various penicillins
Monshi et al., Hepatology 2013
Wuillemin et al., J Immunol, 2013
Is metabolism of flucloxacillin relevant to DILI reactions? Flucloxacillin is a PXR ligand so may induce its own
metabolism? Induction will also affect bile acid synthesis and transporter
levels Our attempts to demonstrate that CYP3A4 or other
CYPs can generate 5'-hydroxymethyl metabolite unsuccessful
• Human liver microsomes with 1 mM flucloxacillin• Overlay of 5'-hydroxymethylflucloxacillin standard
Studies on pooled DILI cases DILI due to any prescribed drug Cases from UK (Diligen), Spain (Spanish
DILI) and US (DILIN) Total number of cases =783
All drug DILI GWAS results
• 783 cases, 3,001 population controls• After correcting for known HLA risk alleles for flucloxacillin-
and amoxicillin-clavulanate-DILI, no deviation from expected p-value distribution
• No SNPs in HLA region approaching genome-wide significance for "other drugs"
All
WithoutFluclox/amoxicillin-clavulanateAll with HLA taken out
Urban et al, 2013 Pharmacogenetics and Genomics
Diclofenac-induced liver injury
Rare toxicity associated with diclofenac use Serious hepatotoxicity 11 per 100,000
patients Believed to be due to metabolic
idiosyncracy ?Specific reactive metabolite which binds
covalently to proteins
Lumiracoxib Diclofenac
HLA-DRB1*15:01 No significant HLA class II association
DILI and related NSAIDs
• Both drugs metabolized by broadly similar pathways
Candidate gene studies on genetic susceptibility to diclofenac-related DILI
UGT2B7*2 and ABCC2 C-24T previously identified as significant risk factors in small (n=24) candidate gene study Daly et al. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:272-281.
Majority of these cases plus additional cases from UK/US included in "all drug" GWAS
GWAS on diclofenac DILI cases (n=30)
GWAS QQ ADME gene QQ
Urban et al, 2013 Pharmacogenetics and Genomics
GWAS hits on diclofenac DILI cases and data on ADME genes as candidates
• PPAR-gamma association did not replicate in 26 additional cases• ADME associations in agreement with our earlier UGT2B7 finding but
PXR an interesting additional candidate
Exome sequencing and exome chip studies on DILI Exome sequencing performed on 125
amoxicillin-clavulanate DILI cases 66 from UK and 59 from Spain All from previous GWAS
Exome chip studies 112 further amoxicillin-clavulanate DILI cases
from iDILIC study and 93 from US DILIN network for replication of exome sequencing
73 UK flucloxacillin DILI cases
Controls for exome sequencing/exome chip studies Exome sequencing
353 NIMH (white US) plus 102 from Spain (EGA)
Exome chip 3900 controls from several cohorts
Combined studies 4300 controls from European sequencing
project (EVS)
Amoxicillin-clavulanate: best results for sequencing plus exome chip with combined data also shown
SGSM3: Small G Protein Signaling Modulator 3
CHR BPSEQ_MAF_
ASEQ_MAF_
U SEQ_PSEQ_O
REC_MAF_
A EC_MAF_U EC_PEC_O
R GENE FUNCT PPHENEVS_MA
F P OR
19 57868483 0 0.021 2.0E-02 0 0.005 0.027 1.4E-02 0.2 ZNF304 missense_variant benign 0.030 3.7E-06 0.1
22 40803845 0.013 0.002 6.3E-02 5.8 0.005 0.000 1.4E-02 19.1 SGSM3 splice_region_variantpossibly_damagin
g 0.000 1.3E-05 27.0
7 107599806 0.114 0.075 6.3E-02 1.6 0.107 0.062 6.6E-04 1.8 LAMB1 missense_variant probably_damaging 0.068 4.0E-05 1.8
15 80137560 0.136 0.081 1.6E-02 1.8 0.135 0.084 5.5E-04 1.7 MTHFS missense_variant benign 0.089 5.1E-05 1.7
14 57092112 0.030 0.012 7.3E-02 2.5 0.024 0.011 1.6E-02 2.3 C14orf101 missense_variant benign 0.006 1.2E-04 3.1
10 55566406 0.360 0.287 3.2E-02 1.4 0.366 0.290 3.0E-03 1.4 PCDH15 missense_variant NA 0.295 1.2E-04 1.4
15 27890491 0.411 0.493 2.8E-02 0.7 0.424 0.498 9.2E-03 1.3 NA NA NA 0.491 1.7E-04 0.7
2 190331180 0.008 0 4.2E-02 NA 0.002 0.000 5.0E-02 NA WDR75 missense_variant possibly_damaging 0.000 1.8E-04 80.8
15 77329417 0.008 0 4.2E-02 NA 0.005 0.000 7.2E-03 38.3 PSTPIP1 missense_variant possibly_damaging 0.000 1.9E-04 21.3
5 96124330 0.415 0.356 9.6E-02 1.3 0.432 0.349 1.7E-04 1.5 ERAP1 missense_variant benign 0.357 1.9E-04 1.4
6 121544432 0.004 0 2.1E-01 NA 0.005 0.000 2.5E-03 NA C6orf170 missense_variant benign 0.000 1.9E-04 78.7
5 96129512 0.267 0.226 2.0E-01 1.2 0.293 0.217 8.6E-05 1.6 ERAP1 synonymous_variant NA 0.220 2.0E-04 1.4
15 42054450 0.008 0 4.2E-02 NA 0.005 0.000 1.4E-02 19.1 MGA missense_variant benign 0.000 2.0E-04 21.1
8 8748032 0.013 0 8.6E-03 NA 0.012 0.002 2.5E-03 6.4 MFHAS1 missense_variant possibly_damaging 0.003 2.8E-04 5.4
5 82491674 0.072 0.034 1.6E-02 2.2 0.073 0.043 1.3E-03 1.9 XRCC4 missense_variant possibly_damaging 0.041 3.0E-04 1.8
2 95947085 0.174 0.223 1.1E-01 0.7 0.176 0.226 6.2E-03 0.7 PROM2 missense_variant benign 0.245 3.1E-04 0.7
2 73786188 0.008 0 4.2E-02 NA 0.005 0.001 3.3E-02 9.6 ALMS1 missense_variant possibly_damaging 0.000 3.2E-04 17.6
17 34893326 0.021 0.068 4.6E-03 0.3 0.029 0.061 1.8E-02 0.5 MYO19 upstream_gene_variant NA 0.053 3.3E-04 0.4
17 72768191 0.008 0.002 1.9E-01 3.9 0.005 0.000 2.5E-03 NA SLC9A3R1 downstream_gene_variant NA 0.001 4.5E-04 15.4
16 77465249 0.004 0 2.1E-01 NA 0.010 0.001 2.2E-03 9.6 ADAMTS18 missense_variant benign 0.001 4.5E-04 9.6
SNP CHR BP MAF_A MAF_U P OR GENE FUNCTION POLYPHENexm-IND5-149355072 5 149374880 0.505 0.398 2.3E-06 1.6 NA NA NAexm813093 10 18439900 0.015 0.001 5.4E-06 23.3 CACNB2 missense_variant benignexm1621613 22 50687883 0.010 0.000 6.1E-06 NA MAPK12 downstream_gene_variant NAexm2267521 13 51133655 0.320 0.445 6.8E-06 0.6 NA NA NAexm748945 9 35618065 0.015 0.001 1.1E-05 19.3 CD72 missense_variant benign
exm1074032 13 86368449 0.029 0.006 2.2E-05 5.1 SLITRK6 missense_variant possibly_damagingexm198643 2 68622914 0.193 0.283 2.9E-05 0.6 PLEK missense_variant benignexm177347 2 25141529 0.010 0.000 2.9E-05 76.9 ADCY3 missense_variant possibly_damaging
exm1026884 12 94965488 0.012 0.001 3.2E-05 24.1 TMCC3 missense_variant probably_damagingexm2270519 6 128709493 0.129 0.077 4.1E-05 1.9 PTPRK intron_variant NAexm941422 11 74883577 0.156 0.097 5.2E-05 1.8 SLCO2B1 missense_variant benign
exm2269450 3 53282188 0.317 0.417 6.4E-05 0.6 TKT intron_variant NAexm-IND19-62843150 19 58151339 0.498 0.398 6.4E-05 1.5 NA NA NA
exm1564814 21 31587859 0.090 0.049 9.6E-05 2.0D21S2091
E upstream_gene_variant NAexm848765 10 101667814 0.068 0.029 1.2E-04 2.3 DNMBP missense_variant benignexm681525 8 10469846 0.007 0.000 1.2E-04 NA RP1L1 missense_variant probably_damaging
exm1389227 18 56400644 0.007 0.000 1.2E-04 NA MALT1 missense_variant probably_damaging
Amoxicillin-clavulanate-exome chip only
CACNB2 not well covered in exome sequencing
Flucloxacillin – Exome chip
• USP8: ubiquitin specific protease 8• Chromosome 6 includes processed pseudogene with strong homology so
finding may due to LD with B*57:01• CASP5-caspase 5
• Replication studies on this looking positive
SNP CHR BP P OR F-A F-U A1 GENE FUNCTION (PPH)exm518448 6 17602870 7.26E-26 20.77 0.2571 0.02458 A NA NA (NA)exm1161045 15 50785016 1.46E-23 11.49 0.5071 0.1445 G USP8 missense (probably-damaging)exm-rs1497546 3 98034526 5.36E-06 4.326 0.1071 0.02752 A NA NA (NA)exm2255202 2 241516094 8.85E-06 4.441 0.09286 0.02424 C RNPEPL1 coding-synonymous (unknown)exm-rs4984390 15 94939508 1.77E-05 0.3766 0.1786 0.3613 G NA NA (NA)exm-rs6582630 12 38743508 6.09E-05 2.091 0.6286 0.4595 G NA NA (NA)exm305107 3 43602803 6.71E-05 0.4259 0.2214 0.4029 C ANO10 missense (benign)exm781146 9 127618776 8.72E-05 19.75 0.02143 0.003151 A WDR38 missense (benign)exm1329395 17 42927723 9.23E-05 3.943 0.08571 0.025 A EFTUD2,HIGD missense (possibly-damaging)exm1223806 16 20966362 9.65E-05 2.657 0.1786 0.07941 C DNAH3 missense (probably-damaging)exm1223776 16 20959918 0.0001076 3.084 0.1214 0.05063 A DNAH3 missense (probably-damaging)exm359484 3 151166058 0.0001385 3.397 0.09286 0.03592 A IGSF10 missense (benign)exm359277 3 151161112 0.0001416 3.39 0.09286 0.03613 G IGSF10 missense (benign)exm1588866 22 21989142 0.0001429 4.222 0.07143 0.02248 A CCDC116 missense (probably-damaging)exm1588898 22 21990823 0.0001429 4.222 0.07143 0.02248 A CCDC116 missense (benign)exm1588914 22 21991120 0.0001429 4.222 0.07143 0.02248 A CCDC116 missense (benign)exm952418 11 104879658 0.000163 3.219 0.1071 0.03765 A CASP5 missense (possibly-damaging)
Sequencing and exome chip studies on DILI: progress so far and where next? Studies show little evidence that rare coding
variants are consistently contributing to risk of DILI due to amoxicillin-clavulanate and flucloxacillin Findings fairly similar to those for other complex
diseases Moving towards whole genome sequencing is
challenging but may be valuable Further GWAS involving new sample collection
with improved power may identify novel associations
Successfully adjudicated new cases in iDILIC to date
Cases mainly from Europe GWAS-exome chip in progress on 747 of these cases Agreed collaboration with DILIN may improve power
Number of cases
Others
Valproate
Sartans
Proton pump inhibitors
Carbamazepine
Co-trimoxazole
Estrogen containing drugs
Anti-TNF agents
Quinolones
Nitrofurantoin
Other NSAIDs
Diclofenac
Flucloxacillin
0 50 100 150 200 250
Summary Genomics has increased understanding of individual risk for
idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury HLA associations
Strong association for flucloxacillin toxicity with HLA-B*57:01 Underlying mechanism could involve inappropriate T cell response Probably does not involve metabolism
HLA genotype not predictor of DILI with all hepatotoxic drugs Increasing evidence that genetically-determined metabolism to reactive
intermediate is an important step in some idiosyncratic DILI reactions Diclofenac
Attempts to identify additional risk factors by exome sequencing largely unsuccessful to date
Larger sample collections for individual drugs and genome sequencing may provide more complete understanding and better application to drug development process
Acknowledgements
NewcastleChris DayPete DonaldsonJulian LeathartJulia PatchRuth WakePallav BhatnagarHeather CordellTom ChamberlainSally Coulthard
Guru Aithal (Nottingham)Munir Pirmohamed (Liverpool)Kevin Park (Liverpool)Dean Naisbitt (Liverpool)Yufeng Shen (Columbia)Aris Floratos (Columbia)Mark Daly (Harvard)Jackie Goldstein (Harvard)Matt Nelson (GSK)Paul Watkins (North Carolina)Tom Urban (Duke)Maribel Lucena (Malaga)Raul Andrade (Malaga)Mariam Molokhia (London)
Supported by the UK Department of Health Pharmacogenetics Initiative and International Serious Adverse Events Consortium
Cumulative incidence of ALT elevations in lapatinib-plus-letrozole treatment group for HLA-DQA1*02:01 carrier and noncarrier subsets, compared with letrozole-only treatment group
Spraggs C F et al. JCO 2011;29:667-673
Human diclofenac toxicity: possible relationship to metabolism
Biliary excretion
MRP2
Covalent adducts
Diclofenac
4'-OH-diclofenac
Diclofenacacylglucuronide
CYP2C9
UGT2B7
Liver injury
Other oxidative metabolitesVariousCYPs
Abacavir hypersensitivity-success story for pharmacogenomic screening
Abacavir is a reverse-transcriptase inhibitor AIDS treatment
Approx. 5% of patients develop hypersensitivity reactions which resolve on discontinuation Rechallenge results in more severe reaction
Up to 100% of proven hypersensitivity cases have one or two HLA B*57:01 alleles Not all patients with this genotype will show
detectable reaction