5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

1/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 1

ACTSC221 Section 1 Blake William Peter Thomas

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 26, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 23, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 22, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 24, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 25, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

62% (39 of 63) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

2/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 2

ACTSC231 Section 1 Freeland R Keith

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 40, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 78, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 33, Good: 50, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 36, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 36, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 27, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 41

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 65, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 35, Good: 41, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 84, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 36, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 59, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 42, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 4, No opinion: 5

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 69, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 15

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 63, 7-10 hours: 27, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

57% (104 of 182) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

3/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 3

ACTSC231 Section 2 Freeland R Keith

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 31, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 60, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 23, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 7

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 26, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 30, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 24, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 18, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 40, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 3, No opinion: 5

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 10

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 45, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

37% (68 of 184) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

4/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 4

ACTSC232 Section 1 Li Siu Hang

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 60, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 58, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 35, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 55, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 51, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 21, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 57, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 41, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 17, No opinion: 13

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 63, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 35, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

72% (68 of 94) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

5/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 5

ACTSC331 Section 1 Skrzydlo Diana Katherine

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 40, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 55, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 29, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 31, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 37, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 28, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 44, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 54, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 13, No opinion: 8

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 53, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 16, 3-6 hours: 38, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3

60% (71 of 119) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

6/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 6

ACTSC371 Section 1 Matheson Brenton James

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 13, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 35, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 11, Somewhat too high: 22, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 4

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 15, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 13, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 32, Unsatisfactory: 16, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 18, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 21, Not often enough: 11, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 46, Not Interesting: 30, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 13, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 64, 75-90%: 21, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 59, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 46, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 55, Not helpful: 21, No text required: 2, No opinion: 6

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

45% (92 of 203) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

7/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 7

ACTSC372 Section 1 Ali Javid

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 64, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 30, Just right: 84, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 62, Good: 51, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 48, Good: 47, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 55, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 50, Most of the time: 26, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 36, Interesting: 67, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 64, Good: 46, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 112, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 83, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 59, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 42, Not helpful: 31, No text required: 18, No opinion: 21

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 84, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 106, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 37, 3-6 hours: 71, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 2

62% (127 of 205) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

8/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 8

ACTSC431/ACTSC831 Section 1 Cai Jun

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 25, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 26, Just right: 45, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 15, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 6

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 24, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 35, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 22, Not often enough: 5, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 34

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 56, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 17, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 77, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 38, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 35, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 11, No opinion: 19

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 59, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 63, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0

46% (85 of 183) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

9/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 9

ACTSC432/ACTSC832 Section 1 Cai Jun

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 23, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 9, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 5

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 18, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 5, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 28, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 20, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 48, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 5

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 8, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 12, No opinion: 15

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 0

64% (69 of 108) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

10/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 10

ACTSC445/ACTSC845 Section 1 Ali Javid

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 70, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 9, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 71, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 63, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 54, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 62, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 39, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 35

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 25, Interesting: 61, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 6

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 71, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 77, 75-90%: 19, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 62, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 8

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 57, No opinion: 17

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 81, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

66% (103 of 156) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

11/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 11

ACTSC446/STAT446 Section 1 Weng Chengguo

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 35, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 43, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 35, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 23, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 34, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 44, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 34, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 29, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 6, No opinion: 14

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 66, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 4

60% (78 of 129) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

12/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 12

ACTSC463/ACTSC863 Section 1 Van Kooten Christopher John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 11, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 10, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 16, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 10, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 12, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 5, No opinion: 5

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 3, No opinion: 5

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

64% (38 of 59) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

13/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 13

AFM101 Section 051 Neil Brisley

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 7, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 6, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

60% (12 of 20) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

14/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 14

AFM102 Section 051 Neil Brisley

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

62% (13 of 21) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

15/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 15

AMATH231 Section 1 Vrscay Edward R

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 0, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 2, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 9, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

43% (12 of 28) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

16/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 16

AMATH250 Section 1 West Joseph John

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 47, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 40, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 41, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 47, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 44, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 5

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 35, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 44, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

50% (66 of 132) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

17/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 17

AMATH251 Section 1 Miskovic Zoran

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 3, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 2, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 8, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 2, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 3, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 6, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 30, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 2

78% (38 of 49) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

18/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 18

AMATH271 Section 1 Emerson Joseph

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 2, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 3, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

81% (22 of 27) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

19/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 19

AMATH310/EARTH310 Section 1 Poulin Francis

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 9, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

61% (11 of 18) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

20/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 20

AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 1 Andre Robert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 30, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 21, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 28, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 29, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 2, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

35% (34 of 97) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

21/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 21

AMATH350 Section 1 Harmsworth David L

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 41, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 25, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 49, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 45, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 52, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 29

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 47, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 13

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 45, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 68, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 56, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 64, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 74, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 64, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

61% (86 of 140) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

22/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 22

AMATH350 Section 2 Harmsworth David L

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 50, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 20, Just right: 41, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 52, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 46, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 55, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 48, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 52, No opinion: 3

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 49, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

67% (70 of 105) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

23/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 23

AMATH351 Section 1 Ingalls Brian

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 30, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 37, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 23, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 28, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 35, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 36, No opinion: 2

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

69% (44 of 64) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

24/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 24

AMATH442 Section 1 Lanson Nathalie

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 6

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

76% (16 of 21) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

25/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 25

AMATH456 Section 1 Siegel David

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 3, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 4

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 15, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

70% (28 of 40) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

26/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 26

AMATH463/AMATH663 Section 1 Poulin Francis

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 15, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 17, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 17, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 8, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

76% (19 of 25) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

27/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 27

AMATH473/AMATH673/PHYS454 Section 1 Konig Robert

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 4, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 4, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 19, No opinion: 0

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

64% (21 of 33) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

28/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 28

CO227 Section 1 Roh Patrick Young

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 9, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 9, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

47% (21 of 45) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

29/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 29

CO250 Section 1 Wormald Nick

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 5, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 14, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 12, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 6, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 8, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 3

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 6, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 37, No opinion: 5

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

51% (54 of 105) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

30/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 30

CO250 Section 2 Gary Au

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 16, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 23, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 14, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 11, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 4

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 13, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 37, No opinion: 4

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 25, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

61% (65 of 107) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

31/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 31

CO255 Section 1 Geelen James F

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 13, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 9, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 14, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 18, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 15, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 1

13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

68% (21 of 31) of students answered some questions.

5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

32/241

Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 32

CO330 Section 1 Katz Eric

Characteristics of the Instructor

1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

Excellent: 5, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

Excellent: 16, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

Excellent: 12, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

7) Did you find the course interesting?

Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

Excellent: 11, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

Characteristics of the Course

9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 3, 50-7