v format abstrak borang pertandingan

Pertandingan Tunas Saintis MRSM Se- Malaysia 2013, MRSM Kuantan

E ABSTRACT FORMAT, APPENDIXES & PARTICIPATION FORMS

PERTANDINGAN TUNAS SAINTIS PERINGKAT KEBANGSAAN 2013 DI MRSM KUANTAN


ABSTRACT FORMAT

TITLE OF PROJECT( FONT 14, TIMES NEW ROMAN, CAPITAL LETTER AND BOLD )

NAME OF PARTICIPANTS( FONT 12 TIMES NEW ROMAN, SMALL LETTER )

NAME OF MRSM( FONT 12, TIMES NEW ROMAN, SMALL LETTER )

a) INTRODUCTION / OBJECTIVES / PURPOSES

( FONT 12, TIMES NEW ROMAN, SMALL LETTER )

b) METHOD / PROCEDURES USED


c) DATA / RESULT


d) DISCUSSION /CONCLUSION


Appendix 1


* An abstract has a maximum of 250 words in one page. It should include all the items from (a) until (d). The abstract must focus on work done in the current year and should not include (i) acknowledgements or (ii) work or procedures done by the mentor.Please refer to samples of abstracts provided.

1. I/We ourselves have done all the procedures stated in the abstract.

YES NO

2. This project has been carried out in a registered Research Institution.

YES NO

3. This project is a continuation project from the previous year’s project.

YES NO

I certify that the above statements are true and the information in the abstract is obtained from a 9-12 months research. I also certify that the research is my own / a group effort.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Individual/Group Leader’s Name

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Signature

CATEGORY : ( FONT 14, TIMES NEW ROMAN,

CAPITAL LETTER,BOLD )


. . . . . . . . . . . . .. Date

Abstract Sample 1

ABSTRACT

DEADLY WATERS : A TWELVE MONTH WATER QUALITY STUDY OF A NEWLY ERUPTED SULFUR SPRING AND ITS LONGITUDINAL EFFECT ON DIAMOND FORK CREEK, PHASE IV.

Shannon L. BabbAmerican Fork High School, American Fork, UT

Focus of study was to research effect of newly erupted sulfur spring on water quality of Diamond Fork Creek. Evaluations were conducted at six sites once a month for a period of twelve months, January through December 2005. Site 1 was one mile upstream of where spring entered Diamond Fork Creek. Site 2 was located where spring erupted from hillside. Site 3 studied effect of spring at its confluence with Diamond Fork Creek. Site 4, 5, and 6 were 1.3 miles, 2.5 miles and 5 miles downstream from the confluence.

Each site was tested chemically, physically and biologically using standardized evaluation tools. Chemical testing included dissolved oxygen, sulfide, pH, ammonia, and nitrate. Physical evaluation included temperature, turbidity, cross-section, flow rate, and riparian zone surveys. Biological evaluation included two macroinvertebrate surveys.

Results demonstrate the spring is having a negative impact on Diamond Fork. According to Utah EPA standards and/or guidelines for cold water fisheries, water quality significantly deteriorates and a dead zone was created. Sulfide levels at confluence


reach toxic levels every month during study period and dissolved oxygen levels drop below acceptable levels for six months.

Water quality begins to improve chemically and physically within 1.3 miles, due to additional streams entering the water course. Unfortunately, the diversity of macroinvertebrates a key indicator of biological health-has not rebounded.

The only way to remediate the damage is stop the sulfur spring and allow water upstream to cleanse toxins from area and transport biological life back.

CATEGORY : CHEMISTRY

Abstract Sample 2

ABSTRACT

SOUNDS INTO SYLLABLES TM.,II : WINDOWS TO THE WORLD OF CHILDHOOD AUTISM

Kayla CornaleAssumption Roman Catholic School, Burlington, Ontario, CANADA

To assist children diagnosed with autism, I created a teaching system called Sounds into SyllablesTM . It is based on the premise that various musical components can assist these children with their linguistic and social development difficulties.

This project represents the second phase of the system in both method and application. Harmony is introduced with the creation of six 3 part harmonies that are linked to the universal emotions of happy, sad, afraid, angry, surprised and disgusted. Three 2 part harmonies have also been created and linked to the concepts of nouns, verbs and adjectives. These harmonies have been integrated into a children’s book (also in computer format) created specifically for the system and titled The Story of Little Bear.


It is designed to assist these children with face perception, recognition of emotional expression and to stimulate interest in the human face so as to improve their social interaction wit others. It also addresses sentence construction by teaching nouns, verbs and adjectives within a series of simple sentences.

The conclusion that musical harmony can assist these children with social and sentence construction difficulties can be drawn from the progress of the nine year old test subject. She has demonstrated enhanced face perception and recognition of emotional expression, wishing to imitate expressions on her own face by using a mirror. Her primary interest in the story is with the changing emotions of the central character Little Bear

CATEGORY : BIOLOGY

TS (1)

PARTICIPATION FORM[To be completed in 2 copies]

1. MRSM

2. CATEGORY CHEMISTRY

3. PROJECT Individual Group

Name Form

4. PARTICIPANT’S NAME i.

(Group/team - not more than 2 persons)

ii.

5. PROJECT TITLE


6. ADVISOR

7. ABSTRACTPlease use the format as shown in Appendix 1 ( containing 2 pages)

8. NOTES

8.1 Electric Source Provided in limited numbers. Students must bring their own extension wires.

8.2 Water SourceWater source is not provided in the display area. Participant must bring their own water container for any projects that require water.

8.3 Laptop/computer/ LCD Projector

Not provided. Please bring your own computer (if needed).

I certify that this project is the result of my own/group effort and has never entered any competition outside MRSM prior to this. I also certify that this project is not a requirement for any PMR or SPM paper.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Name of Individual/Group Leader

Signature Date

CERTIFIED BY :

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Name of Head of Science Department Department’s Stamp :

Signature Date


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Name of Scientific Review Committee Chairman

Signature Date

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Name of PrincipalPrincipal’s Stamp:

Signature Date

TS (1)


1. MRSM

2. CATEGORY BIOLOGY


Name Form



ii.


5. PROJECT TITLE

6. ADVISOR


8. NOTES






. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Signature Date

CERTIFIED BY:



Signature Date


Signature Date


Signature Date

TS (1)


1. MRSM

2. CATEGORY PHYSICS



Name Form



ii.

5. PROJECT TITLE

6. ADVISOR


8. NOTES






. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Signature Date

CERTIFIED BY :



Signature Date


Signature Date


Signature Date

TS( 1)


1. MRSM

2. CATEGORY ENGINEERING/INOVATION



Name Form



ii.

5. PROJECT TITLE

6. ADVISOR


8. NOTES






. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



Signature Date

CERTIFIED BY :


Signature Date


Signature Date


Signature Date

TS (1)



1. MRSM

2. CATEGORY COMPUTER SCIENCE



Name Form


(Group/team - not more than 1 person)

ii.

5. PROJECT TITLE

6. ADVISOR


8. NOTES






. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Signature Date


CERTIFIED BY :


Signature Date


Signature Date


Signature Date

TS (2)

PERTANDINGAN TUNAS SAINTIS MRSMPERINGKAT KEBANGSAAN KALI KE-22, TAHUN 2013

BORANG KEPERLUAN PUNCA GAS(Diisi oleh projek-projek yang memerlukan sahaja)


MRSM : ____________________________________________

TAJUK PROJEK : ____________________________________________

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

KATEGORI PROJEK:____________________________________________

DISAHKAN OLEH :

Ketua Jabatan Sains Pengetua

_____________________ _____________________Nama : Nama :

Tarikh : Tarikh:


BORANG KATEGORI SCIENCE POSTER

TS (4)

PERTANDINGAN TUNAS SAINTIS MRSM PERINGKAT KEBANGSAAN KALI KE 22, TAHUN 2013

BORANG PERAKUAN PESERTA KATEGORI POSTER SAINS

MRSM: ………………………………………………………………………………..

NAMA PESERTA NO. K.P. TING.

1. ………………………………………………… …………………..................... .......

2. ………………………………………………… ………………………………………. ……..

…………………………………. …………………....................Tandatangan Pengetua Cop Rasmi MaktabCop Pengetua:


TS ( 5)

PERTANDINGAN TUNAS SAINTIS MRSM PERINGKAT KEBANGSAAN KALI KE -22, 2013

BORANG MAKLUMAT KONTINJEN (Diisi dalam 3 salinan)

MRSM : _________________________________________________________

A) SENARAI PESERTA (Jumlah tidak melebihi 9 orang pelajar)

KATEGORI TAJUK INDIVIDU @KUMPULAN NAMA PESERTA

NO. K.P L/P TING.

BIOLOGY1.

2.

CHEMISTRY1.

2.

PHYSICS1.

2.

ENGINEERING1.

2.

COMPUTER SCIENCE

1.

2.

TEKNOLOGI PELANCARAN ROKET AIR

1.


B. BILANGAN PESERTA

PESERTA BILANGAN NO. BLOK / DORM / BILIK(Untuk Kegunaan

Penganjur)

LELAKI

PEREMPUAN

JUMLAH

C. SENARAI GURU PENGIRING (1 orang guru sahaja )

NAMA GURU PENGIRING L / PNO. TELEFON BIMBIT

(JIKA ADA)NO. BLOK/BILIK(Untuk Kegunaan

Penganjur)1.

D. SENARAI PEMANDU BAS

NAMA PEMANDU L / PNO. TELEFON BIMBIT

(JIKA ADA)NO. BLOK/BILIK(Untuk Kegunaan

Penganjur)1.

2.

v format abstrak borang pertandingan

Documents