v. greco
DESCRIPTION
ReCo Overview & Prospectives. V. Greco. BNL , 29 April 2005. baryon/meson pattern. Result robust vs uncertainties. Overview: Early successes of Reco+Fragm. p T spectra ( enh. B/M ratio, R AA , Rcp ) Elliptic Flow (“scaling”). Developments I: Extensions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
V. Greco
BNL , 29 April 2005BNL , 29 April 2005
ReCo Overview & ReCo Overview & ProspectivesProspectives
Overview:Overview: Early successes of Reco+Fragm.
pT spectra ( enh. B/M ratio, RAA , Rcp ) Elliptic Flow (“scaling”)
Developments I:Developments I: Extensions Resonances (from QGP or hadron phase) Wave function (Widths, Higher Fock state) Insight on charm interaction v4M/v4B , v1M/v1B Charge Fluctuations
baryon/mesonpattern
Developments II:Developments II: Prospective Jet-like Dynamical Correlations Low pT (Energy, Entropy, # conservation) Links to QCD
Relation to EOS-WG Topics
Result robustvs uncertainties
Hadrons at RHIC
suppression: evidence of jet quenching before fragmentation
Fragmentation p/ Jet quenching should affect bothFragmentation is not the dominant
mechanism of hadronization at pT < 4-6GeV !?
PHENIX, nucl-ex/0212014
PHENIX, nucl-ex/0304022
pionspions protonsprotons
Coalescence vs. Fragmentation
Coalescence:
partons are already there ph= n pT ,, n = 2 , 3$ to be close in phase space $
Even if eventually Fragmentation takes over …
Fragmentation: Leading parton pT ph= z pT
according to a probability Dh(z)
z < 1, energy needed to create quarks from vacuum
Parton spectrum
B M
H
Partonic Hydro behavior shifted at higher pT
Phase-Space Coalescence
)(δ)...,...(),()π2(
σ 111
3
3
i2 iTTnnH
n
iiiq
iiH
T
H ppppxxfpxfpd
dpgpd
dN
fq invariant parton distribution function thermal (mq=0.3 GeV, ms=0.47 GeV)
with radial flow (=0.5)+
quenched minijets (L/= 3.5, mq=0.01GeV, ms=0.175 GeV)
fH hadron Wigner function
2
21
2
21
22
21
2 )()()(2
π9mmppxxf pxM
x =p ~ 0.85 fm coalescence radius parameter
|Mqq->m|2 depends only on the phase space weighted by wave function; npQCD also encoded in the quark masses (gluon dressing), mq=0.3 GeV, ms=0.475 GeV.
TAMU implementation
5.0|| yET ~ 730 GeV
(r)~ 0.5 r/R T ~ 170 MeV
V ~ 900 fm-3
GeVfm-3
dS/dy ~ 4800
L/
T=170 MeV
P. Levai et al., NPA698(02)631
quenchedsoft hard
Locally v1, u1 … not small
Coalescence on bulk matter consistent with hydro, experiments, c
Coalescence Integral solved in a 3D geometry, with radial flow space-momentum correlation (important to fix bulk parton distribution)
Meson & Baryon Spectra
V. Greco et al., PRL90 (03)202302 PRC68(03) 034904R. Fries et al., PRL90(03)202303 PRC68(03)44902R. C. Hwa et al., PRC66(02)025205
Au+Au @200AGeV (central)ππρ
Proton suppression hidden by coalescence!
sh
ReCo dominates up to 4..6 GeV/c; fragmentation and energy loss takes over above.
Baryon/Meson ratio
DUKE
OREGON
TAMU
DUKE
Elliptic Flow
D. Molnar and S.A. Voloshin, PRL91 (03)
/3)(p3v)(pv
/2)(p2v)(pv
Tq2,TB2,
Tq2,TM2,
Enhancement of partonic vEnhancement of partonic v22Coalescence scalingCoalescence scaling
n
p
nT
2V1
Shape consistent with cascade(AMPT, MPC)
To be seen, breaking of the scaling !
Duke
v2,q from a fit to data v2 p, K, prediction
w.f. effect 5% B/M breaking p ~0.25 GeV)Large breaking if p >> (OSU, PRC68)
Effect of Resonances & wave function
K, , p … v2 not affected by resonances! coal. moved towards data
V.G., C.M. Ko, PRC 70 (03)
w.f. + resonance decay
K & p
*
from
Resonances IIK* from QGP decays into a K with a v2 ~ to K directly produced
HG resonances: hadron final stage, h-h rescattering scaling with n=4
K
7.0:)( TPr
HG2
QGP2
full2 ))(1()( vPrvPrv TT )( TPr )( TPr
Medium effects: m* shift v2 of decay product
C. Nonaka , PRC69, 31902 (2004)
r (pT ) is determined by experiments and related to width of particles and cross section in the hadronic medium.
No sensitive to resonance width(Final spectra weak dependence)
Can we learn more via the analisis of resonances v2?Can we see evidence of chiral symmetry restoration?
’s from
Polarized QGP?
Z.T. Liang, X.N. Wang, PRL94,102301(05)
Global transverse polarization in the direction orthogonal to the reactionplane
MECHANISM: qq collision carry an angular momentum that can be transferred to the spin due to spin-orbital coupling
3
1
3
12
2
00
q
q
P
P
dx
dpxpxL z
zy
2~~
Pq degree of quark polarization
Higher Fock StateCostituent quark picture is a good description of hadron PDFas Q2 < 1 GeV2 (higher Fock state are suppressed)Still contribution from higher terms may not be negligible
B. Muller, nucl-th0503003
...321 qqqqcgqqcqqcM Is v2 scaling preserved?
Spectra are also not affected(at least pT >> m )
pn
n
n
nCp
pn
n
n
nCp
M
M
B
B
vBB
M
M
M
M
vMM
)(
)(
12)(
1
)()(
2
)(
)(
12)(
1
)()(
2
v)(v~
v)(v~
Fock state, n = # partons
)5.11(3
2
2
3
1
sv
s
s
n
n
s = # of sea quark
For narrow w.f. limitStandard higher twist w.f
Charmed elliptic flow
V2q from , p, K, L
Coalescence can predictv2D for v2c = 0
S. Kelly,QM04V2 of electrons
V.G. et al., PLB595 (04) 202
Flow mass effect
Charm in a sQGP
Do heavy Flavor Equilibrate (strongly interact)?
Fokker-Plank approach on a hydro bulk evolution
Charm scatters with D hadronic (chiral restored) resonances in the QGP (Van Hees, Rapp, nucl-th/0412015 )
At high pT even light quarks don’t thermalize !
Isotropic cross section
Therm +flow
What happens at lower energy?
p+/ increase by 20%p/ decrease slight decrease
Without changing any coalescence parameter!
V. G., C. Ko, I.Vitev, nucl-th/0412043
Jet quenching from I. Vitev, PLB606, 303 (05)
Balance between fragmentation (w quenching) and coalescence
Uncertainties: amount of quenching,bulk properties (ET, b,..), p fragmentationfunction
Jet-like Correlation
ijijCwwwwW 143211234
20
220 //1cos
000 ,,,;, yyy
TjTijijjiiijjiji eeppfrrScprprC
Factorized Ansatz Factorized Ansatz • Gaussian correlations in azimuthal angle and rapidity y:
– S0=1 inside a Vc ( Vc ~const , Vc ~Npart )
– f0 =1 (weak pT dependence)
– C0 and 0 fixed to fit data
Correlation in the parton distribution
Different processes :F-F, SS-SS, F-SH, F-SS,SH-SH,SH-SS
Recombination enhancesRecombination enhancescorrelations in the parton phase, correlations in the parton phase, ( ~ amplification of elliptic flow)( ~ amplification of elliptic flow)
Source of correlation are jets: dumpenergy and partons into medium
ABAB YdY94.0
0
cone
Large correlationsfrom F-F, favoringbaryon triggers.
Lower associated yield when adding SS-SSwithout correlations(C0=0), especially for baryon triggers.
Mesons Baryons F-F and SS-SS withC0=0.08, Vc~Npart.
F-F and SS-SS withC0=0.08x100/Npart
(Vc~const.)
F-SH (- only)v=0.5
Compatibility with jet-like correlation Microscopic theory desireable: - how much comes from gluon radiation - relative strength of different correlation source Different pT window to constraint f0from R. Fries, HQ04
2/20
2 2/0
eNNQCYN BAABA
Numerical example
Constituent quark masses close in phase space hadronize to giveintermediate pT hadrons with the baryon/meson pattern observed at RHIC:- pT spectra ( enh. B/M ratio, RAA , Rcp, absence of baryon quenching )- Elliptic Flow (“scaling”)- Large D meson v2
This is how QCD seems to work in a dense medium ( @ pq > 0.75 GeV)
Result robust against uncertainty in resonance decay, wave function
(shape, presence of higher Fock state)
Need further investigationNeed further investigationEvolution with beam energy (breakdown point?) Jet-like Correlation Non Zero Rapidity
Connection to QCDConnection to QCD - Chiral Symmetry - Confinement Low pLow pTT
- Energy conservation - Entropy conservation - Particle conservation
What Can we say?
From Fragmentation to ReCo• Fragmentation: 1 parton has to hadronize (e+e-,pp,...AA) • With more partons around: multiple parton
fragmentation (higher twist)
(pp,pA,AA)
• If phase space is filled with partons: recombine/coalesce them into hadrons!
•Dilute system•High virtualities
•Dense system•Low virtualities
R. Fries,HQ04At very low pT most hadrons are formed via coalescence (Voloshin, NPA715 (03))
(AA)
Bulk : Charge Fluctuations
kiik
ikii
i
ch
nncnqN
QD 2
2
4
Recombination with all the quark converted into baryon and meson
Neglecting: Correlations cik
Hadronic diffusion Gluons qqssdduu NNNNNNNQ
45
11
9
1
9
42
Close to the value used in V.G., PRC68 : Nq ~ 1100
Statistical model Nhad at Tc & from recombination Nquark
C. Nonaka et al., nucl-th/0501028
Nhad = 507 (635)Nquark= 1125 (1377)
( ) nonet mesons +octet & decuplet baryons
)350(290
3702
2
COAL
EXP
Q
Q
STAR, PRC68 (2003) 44905
Can we understand the results of fluctuations measurements?Are they compatible with a deconfined medium?
Entropy Conservation
Non-Relativistic/ no quantum effect
thN
NN
TNS log
2
5
2
5
1) g suppose mgm
gg NS 5.2 g
g
g Ng
gNS 8.0log
2
5
70% decrease
2) Our Coalescence (PRC68, 034904)
40804800 HADQGP SS16 % decrease
Volume expansion ( ~ 4 fm/c)
%18/ EE ZTT
ES log
1
But, the energy is not conserved !No factor 2 or more due to:- mass of the particle- off- equilibrium effect
Moreover entropy in the quark phaseMay be reduced by interactionC. Nonaka et al., nucl-th/0501028
What is the role of the mass?
Massive quarksmu ~ 0.3 GeVms ~ 0.5 GeV
What mass is it? It’s a thermal mass(zero component of vector self energy)
0.02 GeV
0.3 GeV
Although thermal quark mass does not breal chiral Symmetry and similar magnitude of both quantities (Mq = 300-350 MeV) near Tc may facilitate the formation of hadrons from 2- and 3- quark clusters. (U . Heinz and P. Levai, PRC57, (2003) 1879)
Spectral function represents an effective way of treating off-shell effect due to the presence of the medium
Thermal masses and energy conservation
Thermal masses are related to EOS in a quasi-particle picture, but interactionis still important !
Self-consistent Dirac-Brueckner (DB)with a LQCD potential : hadronic resonances with chiral restored phaseM.Mannarelli and R.Rapp, work in progr.
Check Consistency with LQCD resonance spectral function
)(Re2/122 kmk Dp
0
0,)(Im2)( kk
4/)()(
)(,
22 k
kkA
p
LQCD V(r)
EOS
Spectralfunction
DB
Input of Coalescence
To be checked: properties of standard coalescence are preserved
Link to LQCD Energy Conservation ( Entropy , Resonances)
Confinement, or use of all Nquark is still pending
Recombination with thermal masses (from LQCD) Recombination with thermal masses (from LQCD)
Use of all quarks Energy - Entropy conservation?
Need for string mechanism at low pT ?
Effect of q-q potential (entropy, pT, link to EOS)
Natural account for Correlation effect in the Fluctuation Jet-like Correlations
Dynamical Coalescence
Quasi particle massive quarks interacting through LQCD potential
Investigation of Coalescence-Clusterization like in molecular dynamics
Does Coalescence work at low pT ?
Better enviroment for:
ReCo can be connected to QCD inside the validity of a massive interacting quasi-quark approach
This will allow to base ReCo on microscopic many-body calculation based on LQCD - Link to EOS - Investigation of Energy, entropy ..
Of Course our hope is to invalidate recombination! Right!
Heavy quark should be a better starting point for a decriptionIn term of q-q potential, more sophisticated model for J/, Y …
Bulk used in coalescence consistent with present knoweledge (ET, S, D..) Elliptic flow of resonances deep insight on ReCo and medium effect Polarization (further check inside into the scaling) Charge Fluctuation
Summary