validation of ostrom’s
TRANSCRIPT
Validation of Ostrom’s Framework to Support a Circular Economy for Used Electronics – A Shared Vision
Carol Handwerker (Purdue University)Bill Olson (ASM - formerly Seagate)
Mark Schaffer (iNEMI)
MRS 2019
Value Recovery from Used Electronics
Name CompanyIkenna Nlebedim, Helena Khazdozian, Denis Prodius Ames Laboratory
Bill Olson ASM (formerly Seagate)
Neil Peters-Michaud Cascade Asset Mgmt.
Abbey Burns, Gideon Schroeder Cisco
Alex King (retired) Critical Materials Institute
Mark Glick Echo Environmental
Wayne Rifer GEC Emeritus
Gary Spencer GEODIS
Ikenna Ike, Ines Sousa Google
Ruby Nguyen Idaho National Laboratory
Carleen Matuska Microsoft
Preston Bryant Momentum Technology
Tim McIntyre, Jonathan Harter, Tim Burress, Jason Pries,
Ramesh Bhave
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
Carol Handwerker, Kali Frost, Nehika Mathur Purdue University
Joanne Larson, Laura Yurik, Monty Forehand, Wade Fott Seagate
Ian Lovell, Kong-Meng Lee, Xavier Hubert, Chris Tejeda Teleplan
Hongyue Jin University of Arizona
Alex Bevan, Peter Afiuny, Catalina Tudor, Miha Zakotnik Urban Mining Company
Mark Schaffer, iNEMI
International Electronics
Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI) • not-for-profit, highly efficient R&D consortium of
approximately 90 leading electronics manufacturers,
suppliers, associations, government agencies and
universities.
• roadmaps the future technology requirements of the
global electronics industry,
• identifies and prioritizes technology and infrastructure
gaps,
• helps eliminate those gaps through timely, high-impact
deployment projects conducted by iNEMI members
3
Key Findings fromiNEMI Metals Recycling Project
4
• Needs: “Value Recovery” in the context of a circular economy
• Key role for iNEMI, CMI, and their members to play in
increasing metals recovery, while promoting sustainable
electronics.
– Focus on value recovery through Design for Sustainability.
– Focus on innovative designs, business models,
technologies, supply chains to support value recovery
– Focus on community building and self-managing the
commons
• Of particular importance is the ability of iNEMI to engage
stakeholders to examine new approaches to managing critical
resources and increasing value recovery while protecting
human health and safety and the environment.
Value Recovery from Used Electronics
Name CompanyIkenna Nlebedim, Helena Khazdozian, Denis Prodius Ames Laboratory
Bill Olson ASM (formerly Seagate)
Neil Peters-Michaud Cascade Asset Mgmt.
Abbey Burns, Gideon Schroeder Cisco
Alex King (retired) Critical Materials Institute
Mark Glick Echo Environmental
Wayne Rifer GEC Emeritus
Gary Spencer GEODIS
Ikenna Ike, Ines Sousa Google
Ruby Nguyen Idaho National Laboratory
Carleen Matuska Microsoft
Preston Bryant Momentum Technology
Tim McIntyre, Jonathan Harter, Tim Burress, Jason Pries,
Ramesh Bhave
Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
Carol Handwerker, Kali Frost, Nehika Mathur Purdue University
Joanne Larson, Laura Yurik, Monty Forehand, Wade Fott Seagate
Ian Lovell, Kong-Meng Lee, Xavier Hubert, Chris Tejeda Teleplan
Hongyue Jin University of Arizona
Alex Bevan, Peter Afiuny, Catalina Tudor, Miha Zakotnik Urban Mining Company
Mark Schaffer, iNEMI
Fast Turn Project –Value Recovery from Hard Disk Drives
Actors:HDD Manufacturers – 3 globally
(Seagate, Western Digital, Toshiba)
HDD Users – data center, enterprise, cloud, computer
Authorized After-market Service Providers – approx. 10
Recyclers and IT Asset Management Companies – >> 100k
Secondary Market Buyers and Sellers – 100k
Smelters and Other Materials Recovery Organizations-???
After First-Market Users - data center, enterprise, cloud,
computer
Researchers – university, national lab, corporate
Phase 2 iNEMI Project –Value Recovery from Hard Disk Drives
Members in the project with a common goal
HDD Manufacturers – Seagate
HDD Users – Cisco, Google, Microsoft
Authorized After-market Service Providers – Teleplan
Recyclers and IT Asset Management Companies –Geodis, Cascade
Asset Management, Echo Environmental
Secondary Market Buyers and Sellers – connected through recyclers
Smelters and Other Materials Recovery Organizations- Momentum
Technologies, Urban Mining Corporation
After First-Market Users - consumers, data center, enterprise, cloud,
computer – connected through HDD Users + AM Service Providers
Technology Developers – research organizations (national labs,
universities, all the above) – CMI – Ames, INL, ORNL, Purdue
Standards organizations – GEC (EPEAT)9
Key Resources
• Published literature: UN Environmental Programme series, Umicore,
Graedel, Meskers, Hageluken, Stevels, Ostrom, Babbitt, Dahmus,
Gutowski, Williams, and others
The Tragedy of the Commons
“The Tragedy of the Commons” – Hardin (Science - 1968)
○ A few people will destroy common pool resources by operating out of
narrow self-interest for short-term gain
○ It is inevitable unless all resources are privatized or controlled by the
government
Hardin’s Assumptions about Human Behavior and Capabilities – quoted from Ostrom
• Norm-free maximizers of immediate personal gain who will
not cooperate to overcome the perverse incentives of such
gain unless coerced by external authorities
• Government officials are implicitly assumed as seeking the
general public interest and being able to analyze long-term
patterns to design optimal policies.
• Designing rules to change the incentives is a relatively
simple analytical task best done by objective analysts not
intimately connected to any specific resource.
• Organization requires central direction; if it is not centrally
directed it is by definition not a recognized organization –
even “invisible” to those who cannot imagine organization
without centrally imposed rules and regulations.
Self-managing the commons
Game A:
Individuals are able:
• To engage in problem solving to increase long-term
payoffs
• To make promises
• To build reputations for trustworthiness
• To reciprocate trustworthiness with trust
• To punish those who are not trustworthy
Game B:
Individuals seek their own short-term, narrow interests
even when presented with situations where everyone’s
joint returns could be substantially increased by
cooperation
18
Stakeholders• Show leadership & entrepreneurship
• Have the power to make decisions about the system
• Trust each other and maintain trust through their actions
• Understand the SES framework and have mental models
of the system and how the different stakeholders interact
• Acknowledge the importance of the resource to their
livelihoods and acknowledge their interdependence
System • Is manageable - not too large, not too small
• Is productive
• Dynamics are known and predictable
Resource• Is mobile enough - not too volatile, not too static
Key Criteria for Self-Managing Systems
19
We posit
One Additional Necessary Factor for Success
Actors have shared goals for the SYSTEM as well as
individual goals for themselves and recognize that others’
individual goals are important -
so that when there are disagreements or things get “hard”, we
continue to work together to meet our shared goals
This is explicitly what we are developing in the
iNEMI Value Recovery project
Winning the Sustainabiility “Game”
Phase 2 iNEMI Project –Value Recovery from Hard Disk Drives
Members in the project with a common goal
HDD Manufacturers – Seagate
HDD Users – Cisco, Google, Microsoft
Authorized After-market Service Providers – Teleplan
Recyclers and IT Asset Management Companies –Geodis, Cascade
Asset Management, Echo Environmental
Secondary Market Buyers and Sellers – connected through recyclers
Smelters and Other Materials Recovery Organizations- Momentum
Technologies, Urban Mining Corporation
After First-Market Users - consumers, data center, enterprise, cloud,
computer – connected through HDD Users + AM Service Providers
Technology Developers – research organizations (national labs,
universities, all the above) – CMI – Ames, INL, ORNL, Purdue
Standards organizations – GEC (EPEAT)20