validity = accuracy of studyreliability = consistency of results

42
Validity = accuracy of study Reliability = consistency of results

Upload: yeva

Post on 25-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results. VALIDITY- Does your study reveal accurate and representative results?. Reliability. Is the measure able to give consistent measures over time?. Reliability checks?. Test-retest Split-half Inter-observer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Validity = accuracy of study Reliability = consistency of results

Page 2: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

VALIDITY- Does your study reveal accurate and representative results?

Page 3: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Reliability

• Is the measure able to give consistent measures over time?

Page 4: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results
Page 5: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Reliability checks?

• Test-retest• Split-half• Inter-observer

• Convergence…replications

Page 6: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

VALIDITY- Does your study reveal accurate and representative results?

• Internal Validity and External Validity

– External Validity- generalizability• Issues

» Sampling» Return rates» …..

Page 7: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

…External Validity

• Generalizeability– Across population– Across environments– Across time

Page 8: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Internal Validity

Page 9: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results
Page 10: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Convergent validity

• Different manipulations• Different measuring devices• Different populations…etc

• Replication

Page 11: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

COMMON THREATS TO VALIDITY

• Selection bias– random selection and

assignment– Pretesting and matching

– Recruitment technique

Page 12: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

History and Maturation Effects

• Changes in the DV over time• Between pretest and post-test • Or between test sessions

– constancy

Page 13: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Mortality

• Subject loss Over time

• May reflect unintended effect of IV or DV• Subject loss may result in selection bias

Page 14: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

STOP FOR FUN!

• ESP in PSYCHOLOGY??– Somewhat critical– Lacking empirical validation– Should we remain open-minded?

– Let’s give it a shot

Page 15: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

One of these symbols on each trial

Page 16: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

STOP until test complete

Trial Number Symbol

1 red 2 blue 3 green 4 green 5 red 6 yellow 7 yellow 8 blue 9 red 10 blue 11 blue 12 yellow 13 red 14 green 15 green 16 green 17 blue 18 red 19 yellow 20 yellow

Page 17: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

What is Chance Performance?

-1 out of 4 for each trial…-20 trials

Chance performance = 5

Page 18: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Just for fun let’s try again..this time seriously!

Page 19: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

answers

Trial Number Symbol

1 Blue 2 Blue 3 Yellow 4 Red 5 Green 6 Yellow 7 Yellow 8 Red 9 Red 10 Green 11 Green 12 Blue 13 Red 14 Green 15 Yellow 16 Red 17 Blue 18 Blue 19 Yellow 20 green

Page 20: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Statistical Regression

• Regression to the mean with repeated testing

• Watch out for extreme scores..they may be due to chance

Page 21: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Instrumentation

• Changes in DV due to changes in measurement, not due to IV

Page 22: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Sequence Effects-repeated testing effects

• Practice effects• Test sensitization• Boredom/fatigue• Carry-over

– Randomization and counterbalancing

Page 23: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Subject Bias

• Subjects can have attitude! RESPONSE SETS that produce inaccurate results– Soc desireability– Cooperitivity– Negativity– Volunteerism– -blindin-recruitment

-deception or disguiselie detectors

Page 24: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Experimentor Bias

• Experimentors like to be correct! CONFIRMATIONAL BIAS

• Demand characteristics– constancy– Automation– Double blinding

Page 25: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

How would you use blinding in a MJ drug study?

Page 26: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

PLACEBO EFFECTS ARE REAL

• Expectation

• What might someone expect MJ to do?

• Beliefs/expectations can lead to real results….that are not related to the real effects of the IV.

Page 27: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROL DESIGNS

• Fake MJ?/ Ciggarette/ Pill other• Constancy• Can tease apart placebo effects from real

drug effects.

Page 28: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

RANGE EFFECTS

• Don’t forget the inability to see an affect of an IV on a DV does not necessarily mean there isn’t one.

• Ceiling effects• Basement effects

Page 29: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

ULTIMATE CONTROL

• Control procedures may be tailored for unique experiments

• Ultimate control may never be completely achieved

Page 30: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

BEING A REAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENTIST??

• The crux- identification of potential confounds

• AND• RIVAL HYPOTHESIS

Page 31: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

RIVAL HYPOTHESIS

• Alternative explanations for experimental results

• Alternative to the research hypothesis

Page 32: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Consider the following

Hampton Court Maze

Page 33: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

The radial arm maze for rats

Page 34: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Training of rats on the RAM

• Initial freezing• Adaptation and exploration• Neophobia to food pellet• Adaptation to food• Rapid acquisition of task

Page 35: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

RAM memory errors?

• Entrance into previously entered arm• One foot? Two? Half-way? All the way?

Page 36: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Rats become quite good

• Rarely make a memory error• Win-shift strategy

Page 37: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Maybe they take an algorithmic strategy

• Right-right-right etc

Page 38: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

To control for strategies..forced choice procedures

Page 39: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Using forced-choice procedures

• No indication of algorithm• Performance still very good

Page 40: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

SO…

• What does rat performance in RAM show us?

Page 41: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Rival Hypothesis?

• Memory or sensory guidance?• Intra-maze or extramaze guidance?

• Spatial memory or…..?

Page 42: Validity = accuracy of studyReliability = consistency of results

Motivation-deficitsSensory-deficitsAttention-deficits