vertex 2001 brunnen, switzerland phil allport gianluigi casse ashley greenall salva marti i garcia...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Phil AllportGianluigi Casse
Ashley GreenallSalva Marti i Garcia
Charge Collection Efficiency Studies with Irradiated Silicon
Detectors
Evaluation of trapping effects
The influence of ballistic deficit
Fits to the Charge Collection Efficiency
Discussion and Conclusions
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Evaluation of Trapping Effects
Radiation damage to silicon detectorsincreases reverse currents, creates interface trapped charge, introduces traps reducing charge collection efficiencieschanges the effective doping concentrations
Studies of the latter effect have shown significant improvements under charged hadron irradiation when high concentrations of interstitial oxygen are introduced
However, unlike in the case of n-side read-out detectors, the charge collection efficiencies for p-side read-out detectors do not plateau with voltage until well above the depletion voltage
This is usually assigned to the effect of trapping
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Old ATLAS Irradiated n-in-n Results
21014p/cm2
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Detectors Studied
Studies carried out with SCT miniature (cmcm) p-side read-out micro-strip detectors (processed as test structures on ATLAS prototype wafers) using wide bandwidth (Phillips 6954) current amplifier
Comparisons with the large area devices using SCT-128 analogue read-out have demonstrated good agreement (G. Casse et al.)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Evaluation of Trapping Effects
Capacitance – Voltage Derived Depletion Voltage
0
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0008
0.001
0.0012
0.0014
0.0016
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Bias [V]
1/C
2 [p
F-2
]
1.90.11014p/cm2
Oxygenated MiniatureMicro-strip Detector
VFD = 100 7 V from fitting C(V)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Evaluation of Trapping Effects
Corresponding Charge Collection Efficiency vs Voltage
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
No
rma
lis
ed
co
lle
cte
d c
ha
rge
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
100 V
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Evaluation of Trapping Effects
The effects of trapping can be parameterized in terms of effective trapping time (Kramberger et al.) or, equivalently, velocity dependent attenuation length (Marti i Garcia et al.)
In both cases, trapping is highest where the field is lowest
These parameterizations assume timescales such that the total untrapped charge is collected, integrating over transient effects.
No influence of ballistic deficit is included
Both analyses give values of (averaged over e and h) that agree. e,h eq = 1/eff e,h (trapping flux)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Influence of Ballistic Deficit
Since at the LHC electronics response times are close to charge collection times, signal loss due to incomplete charge integration must also be considered, which will also depend on the field within the detector.
Non-irradiated p-strip Detector
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Influence of Ballistic Deficit
Oxygenated and non-oxygenated detectors have been studied which were irradiated in the CERN-PS and annealed to the minimum of the Neff vs time annealing curve
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Influence of Ballistic Deficit
Detector label Fluence [p cm-2]Oxygenation[~2·1017 at. Cm-3]
NI Non-irradiated NoSO1 1.90.1 ·1014 YesSN1 1.90.1 ·1014 NoSO2 2.90.2 ·1014 YesSN2 2.90.2 ·1014 NoSO3 5.10.4 ·1014 YesSN3 5.10.4 ·1014 No
Several miniature detectors have been studied after irradiation and annealing.
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Influence of Ballistic Deficit
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
No
rmal
ise
d c
olle
cte
d c
har
ge
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
Miniature detectors irradiated to 1.91014p/cm2
Non-Oxygenated Oxygenated
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Bias [V]
No
rmal
ise
d c
olle
cte
d c
har
ge
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Influence of Ballistic Deficit
Miniature detectors irradiated to 2.91014p/cm2
Non-Oxygenated Oxygenated
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
Nor
mal
ised
col
lect
ed c
harg
e
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
Nor
mal
ised
col
lect
ed c
harg
e
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Influence of Ballistic Deficit
Miniature detectors irradiated to 5.11014p/cm2
Non-Oxygenated Oxygenated
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Bias [V]
No
rma
lise
d c
oll
ect
ed
ch
arg
e
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
No
rmal
ise
d c
olle
cte
d c
har
ge
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Q (80 ns)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Non-Oxygenated Detectors: Relative Ballistic Deficit
Oxygenated
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
5.11014 p/cm22.91014 p/cm2
1.91014 p/cm2Non-irradiated
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Oxygenated Detectors: Relative Ballistic Deficit
5.11014 p/cm2
2.91014 p/cm21.91014 p/cm2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 200 400 600 800
Bias [V]
QV/Q
V(8
0 n
s)
Q (10 ns)
Q (25 ns)
Q (40 ns)
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Fits to the Charge Collection Efficiency
The above results suggest that, particularly at high doses, the ballistic deficit is not a major factorfor LHC speed operation
In the following fits, sufficient integration time has anyway been allowed such that the only charge loss is due to trapping
Free parameters: attenuation length ,depletion voltage VFD total generated charge Q0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Bias [V]
Q/Q
0
Oxygenated
Non-oxygenated
1.91014 p/cm2
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Fits to the Charge Collection Efficiency
2.91014 p/cm2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Bias [V]
Q/Q
0
Oxygenated
Non-oxygenated
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 200 400 600 800 1000Bias [V]
Q/Q
0 Oxygenated
Non-oxygenated
5.11014 p/cm2
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Fits to the Charge Collection Efficiency
Detector label
Fluence[p cm-2]
Oxygenenrichme
nt
VFD [V](From C-V)
VFD [V](From CCE)
[m]
NI Non irr. No 49 2 50 2
SO1 1.90.1 · 1014 Yes 100 7 90 2 1338 15
SN1 1.90.1 · 1014 No 150 8 137 2 1407
220
SO2 2.90.2 · 1014 Yes 121 7 130 2 1224
138
SN2 2.90.2 · 1014 No 218 15 214 4 1313
122
SO3 5.1 0.4 · 1014 Yes 181 15 196 3 731 84
SN3 5.10.4 · 1014 No 320 20 348 7 781 55
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Fits to the Charge Collection Efficiency
The fitted values of VFD agree with each other and with oxygenated data from RD48 (CERN LHCC 2000-009) taking account of the proton damage factor
The fitted values of Q0:18.10.3, 18.20.3, 17.70.3, 18.10.6, 18.20.4 and 18.30.4 are all consistent and agree with the pre-irradiation value 17.90.3
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Fits to the Charge Collection Efficiency
The dependence of Q/Q0 and therefore on leads to a value of eff = 5.60.610-16cm2/nsAssuming this value allows extrapolation of CCE to high
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 1E+14 2E+14 3E+14 4E+14 5E+14 6E+14
Fluence [p cm-2]
Q/Q
0
(Charge collected at VFD)/Q0 - Ox. detectors
(Maximum collected charge)/Q0 - Ox. detectors
(Charge collected at VFD)/Q0 - Non-ox. detectors
(Maximum collected charge)/Q0 - Non-ox. detectors
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Discussion and Conclusions
Because for p-strip read-out, the trapping significantly affects the CCE(V), the improvements in VFD due to oxygenation do not give correspondingly large effects in terms of CCE The trapping dependence on the field leads to CCE(VFD) being higher for non-oxygenated than oxygenated detectors by ~5%
Read-out from the high-field n-side gives less dependence on trapping leading to the CCE(V) V behaviour below VFD
This would imply that for high doses, n-side readout should benefit more from oxygenation of the substrate
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Discussion and Conclusions
The LHC-b vertex detector is proposed to use oxygenated n-strip detectors for which the first prototypes have just been delivered to Liverpool and are currently being irradiated in the CERN PS
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Discussion and Conclusions
LHC-b uses back-to-back thinned disks for r and plus double-metal routing
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Discussion and Conclusions
LHC-b and the pixel systems of ATLAS and CMS need to maximise their survival; n-side readout oxygenated detectors look to offer the best possibilities
Super-LHC with factor of 10 increased luminosity could also need such technology
Vertex 2001 Brunnen, Switzerland
Discussion and Conclusions
Detectors produced with n-side read-out do suffer from the disadvantage of requiring potentially expensive double-sided processing
Use of p-type substrates does provide a viable alternative where cost is of paramount importance
Comparison of p-type and n-type detectors after 31014 p/cm2