vision of solar market pathways project 15 future success...
TRANSCRIPT
Tyler Espinoza, Senior Project Manager, Optony CICV Solar Market Pathways Briefing| May 22, 2015
Vision of Solar Market Pathways Project 15 FUTURE SUCCESS STORIES
2
Why We’re Here • SunShot Ini?a?ve • Solar Market Pathways Overview • Benefits of Par?cipa?on
Project Implementa>on • Project Objec?ves • Project Timeline • Stakeholder Engagement • Site Visits and Assessments • Feasibility Reports • Solar Master Plans
Future Success Stories • Collabora?ve Procurement • Case studies • Challenges & opportuni?es
Agenda
3
Feasibility Assessment > Solar Master Plan > Collabora?ve Procurement
WHY WE’RE HERE
Create a replicable plan to install 30MW of solar PV across 15 private colleges in Virginia by 2020
4 Source: U.S. Department of Energy
5 Source: U.S. Department of Energy
6
Why We’re Here
Sustainability • Reducing campus GHG emissions • Suppor?ng Presidents’ Climate Commitment • Reducing electricity costs • Providing long-‐term budget stability
Student Involvement • Curriculum Enhancement ü Science & Technology ü Legal & Policy ü Business & Finance
Economic Development • Promo?ng local economic development • Energizing the New Virginia Economy • Advancing job crea?on >>>
7
Why We’re Here
Source: The Solar Foundation
© 2014 Optony Inc.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
9
Project Objec?ves
1. Create a replicable plan for 15 private colleges in Virginia to deploy 30 MW of solar PV by 2020. 2. Improve local procedural, administra?ve, financial, and legal processes. 3. Achieve ?ered price reduc?ons by leveraging group purchasing power & innova?ve models. 4. U?lize the exis?ng exper?se and capabili?es of par?cipa?ng faculty and staff. 5. Create and maintain a learning network that will encourage and enable project replica?on.
Project team on track to meet all milestones & deliverables.
Presidents Leading dialogue with Boards Finance Ensuring financial viability of proposals Facilities Providing vital accessibility and data Faculty Integrating project components into curriculum Students Receiving hands-on learning opportunities Utilities Offering programs and interconnection State Officials Setting timely clean energy goals and policies Industry Bringing innovative solutions and financing
Conduct Site Visits
Project Kick-‐Off
Develop RFP
Documents
DraL Feasibility Reports
Vendor(s) Iden>fied
DraL Solar Master Plans
Proposal Evalua>on
Second RFP
Issued
First RFP Issued
2015 2016 2017
College Decision Point
Vendor(s) Iden>fied
Proposal Evalua>on
Share Best
Prac>ces
Contract Nego>a>on
Project Timeline
10
11
Stakeholder Engagement
Biannual stakeholder workshops, student professional trainings, utility regulatory discussions, local government policy benchmarking, regular external communications, peer learning networks, and more…
12
Solar Project Evalua?on Process
All Potentially Viable Sites for Consideration
Initial Pre-screening & Assessment
High Potential
Sites
Solar RFP
Site Visits & Feasibility
Studies Competitive Procurement
Process
Site Visits & Assessments
Solar Site Feasibility Checklist
• On-‐site review of opportuni?es and challenges for solar • Electrical, shading, and roof evalua?on • Construc?on concerns and design considera?ons • U?lity rate structure evalua?on • Review of financing op?ons & available incen?ves • 20 year LCOE Financial analysis • Benchmark comparison of pricing & trends
13
Site%Index Site%NameDevelopment%
Priority
%Recommended%PV%System%Size
(kW%DC)%
%Annual%PV%Output%(kWh)%
%Annual%Building%Usage%(kWh)%
Energy%Offset
Direct%%Purchase%Cost%Range1
NPV2%
Direct%Purchase%Savings
NPV2%
Loan%Savings
NPV2%
PPA%Savings
Recommended%Financing%Mechanism
DGS04 Anacostia.High.School A 179 149,076 999,306 7% $594,543.<.$657,127 $136,672 $110,020 $158,025 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS06 Brightwood.Education.Campus A 108 210,085 2,993,829 7% $359,599.<.$397,451 $53,233 $37,113 $79,718 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS13 Deal.Middle.School A 56 122,774 1,668,547 2% $199,928.<.$220,973 $26,976 $18,013 $35,729 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS14 Deanwood.Recreation.Center A 237 373,111 1,056,583 20% $789,089.<.$872,151 $140,815 $105,442 $179,019 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS15 Eastern.High.School A 256 93,871 885,600 8% $851,599.<.$941,241 $153,123 $114,947 $193,397 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS18 Evidence.Control.Branch A 130 173,644 2,276,191 100% $432,250.<.$477,750 $66,421 $47,044 $96,238 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS23 C.W..Harris.Elementary.School A 195 810,602 1,895,447 45% $649,572.<.$717,948 $165,231 $136,112 $175,708 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS24 H.D..Woodson.High.School A 503 67,220 3,288,492 18% $1,552,580.<.$1,716,010 $501,278 $431,679 $512,037 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS25 Hendley.Elementary.School A 150 275,709 1,409,633 32% $498,085.<.$550,515 $108,802 $86,474 $131,292 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS26 Hillcrest.Recreation.Center A 117 297,852 3,871,189 34% $388,792.<.$429,718 $99,848 $82,420 $105,351 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS27 Kelly.Miller.Middle.School A 301 161,163 1,473,984 18% $1,000,426.<.$1,105,734 $249,902 $205,055 $269,734 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS28 King.Elementary.School A 160 148,217 148,435 46% $532,033.<.$588,037 $116,916 $93,066 $124,445 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS30 LaSalle<Backus.Education.Campus A 111 338,282 458,854 14% $370,538.<.$409,542 $72,384 $55,774 $85,130 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS31 Luke.C..Moore.High.School A 95 233,594 513,531 10% $317,371.<.$350,779 $81,506 $67,279 $85,998 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS35 Moten.Elementary.School A 84 588,566 3,313,767 17% $277,937.<.$307,193 $71,379 $58,920 $75,312 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS36 Municipal.Warehouse A 377 174,545 548,745 47% $1,254,955.<.$1,387,055 $175,909 $119,652 $276,525 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS37 Nalle.Elementary.School A 150 140,058 413,394 23% $499,016.<.$551,544 $126,934 $104,564 $134,983 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS40 Patterson.Elementary.School A 195 358,597 2,026,165 27% $648,442.<.$716,699 $142,497 $113,429 $151,673 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS41 Payne.Elementary.School A 290 191,658 413,396 76% $962,953.<.$1,064,317 $221,611 $178,444 $255,993 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS42 Plummer.Elementary.School A 151 84,792 776,409 40% $501,610.<.$554,411 $128,822 $106,336 $135,920 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS44 Randle.Highlands.Elem..School A 170 131,109 906,223 16% $565,549.<.$625,081 $124,281 $98,929 $132,285 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS45 Raymond.Education.Campus A 262 114,329 1,139,421 42% $872,447.<.$964,283 $165,123 $126,013 $199,538 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS46 Savoy.Elementary.School A 166 232,575 1,010,956 15% $552,150.<.$610,271 $77,396 $52,644 $121,664 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS51 Stoddert.Elementary.School A 169 100,123 582,079 17% $561,327.<.$620,414 $123,353 $98,190 $131,297 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS52 Takoma.Education.Campus A 165 425,878 903,915 15% $549,855.<.$607,735 $106,948 $82,299 $126,248 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS54 Trinidad.Recreation.Center A 86 179,452 764,693 40% $284,587.<.$314,543 $51,082 $38,325 $64,614 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS55 Turner.Elementary.School A 196 233,593 873,826 21% $651,235.<.$719,786 $153,764 $124,570 $173,873 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS60 J.O..Wilson.Elementary.School A 171 340,328 447,971 16% $568,209.<.$628,021 $124,866 $99,394 $132,907 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS61 Wilson.High.School A 119 180,699 456,420 3% $394,578.<.$436,112 $86,122 $68,434 $92,193 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS62 Wilson.Aquatic.Center A 81 203,732 1,279,194 100% $267,663.<.$295,838 $53,952 $41,953 $61,778 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS02 5th.District.Police.Station B 126 307,309 737,706 15% $419,416.<.$463,565 $84,493 $65,692 $96,796 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS10 H.D..Cooke.Elementary.School B 78 187,376 1,233,728 11% $260,580.<.$288,010 $66,921 $55,240 $70,609 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS17 Ellington.School.of.the.Arts B 135 108,292 468,776 11% $447,379.<.$494,471 $114,894 $94,839 $121,226 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS20 Garrison.Elementary.School B 287 106,287 381,119 74% $953,909.<.$1,054,321 $189,228 $146,466 $219,649 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS34 Miner.Elementary.School B 194 356,310 1,782,564 23% $645,615.<.$713,575 $165,805 $136,863 $174,941 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS48 Shepherd.Elementary.School B 90 202,211 1,209,661 23% $300,613.<.$332,257 $77,203 $63,727 $81,457 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS57 Walker<Jones.Education.Campus B 110 194,435 1,278,138 5% $364,320.<.$402,670 $74,114 $57,782 $84,203 Collaborative.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS07 Burrville.Elementary.School C 313 265,838 810,755 35% $1,039,462.<.$1,148,879 $261,697 $215,100 $280,652 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS11 Coolidge.High.School C 145 99,513 249,789 8% $482,025.<.$532,765 $123,792 $102,184 $130,614 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS12 DC.Police.Academy.Annex C 705 231,154 1,100,880 43% $2,177,305.<.$2,406,495 $561,687 $464,084 $621,801 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS29 Langley.Education.Campus C 71 134,670 411,123 11% $252,189.<.$278,736 $34,027 $22,722 $45,069 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS49 Smothers.Elementary.School C 89 129,682 2,734,470 28% $295,559.<.$326,671 $64,245 $50,996 $69,013 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS50 Sousa.Middle.School C 301 121,600 1,519,100 20% $999,395.<.$1,104,595 $205,482 $160,681 $231,355 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS53 3rd.District.Police.Station C 232 204,690 1,305,019 33% $772,597.<.$853,923 $122,214 $87,580 $172,610 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS56 Tyler.Elementary.School C 116 141,987 5,222,675 33% $385,567.<.$426,153 $82,481 $65,197 $101,298 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
DGS58 West.Education.Campus C 102 95,145 95,250 8% $337,554.<.$373,086 $74,178 $59,047 $78,955 Roof.Upgrade.<>.Procurement.w/PPA
Total%Development%Priority%A%Sites 30 5,430 7,135,232 38,796,187 18% $18,668,113%Y%$20,633,177 $3,907,143 $3,102,533 $4,498,625Total%Development%Priority%B%Sites 7 1,020 1,462,220 7,091,691 21% $3,391,833%Y%$3,748,868 $772,658 $620,610 $848,881Total%Development%Priority%C%Sites 9 2,073 1,424,279 13,449,059 11% $7,101,252%Y%$7,848,753 $1,529,804 $1,227,591 $1,731,367Total%for%All%Sites 46 8,523 10,021,731 59,336,937 17% $28,082,401%Y%$31,038,444 $6,209,606 $4,950,733 $7,078,872
Feasibility Reports
14
Poten?al Content o Introduc?on o Campus Building Por^olio o Solar Feasibility Assessment o Collabora?ve Procurement Plan o Codes, Regula?ons, and Processes o Curriculum Integra?on o Student Involvement o Template Documents
Solar Master Plan
15
15 FUTURE SUCCESS STORIES
16
Enable Regional Collabora>on & Tailored Support
Lead Agency à CICV
Round 1 Procurement 15+ Facili*es for 10+ MW
15 Par>cipa>ng Colleges
Independent Solar Expert & Buyer’s Representa>ve
Round 3 Procurement 15+ Sites for 10+ MW
Create Local Jobs, S0mulate Economic Ac0vity, and Achieve Energy Savings & GHG Reduc0ons
Round 2 Procurement 15+ Sites for 10+ MW
Approach
Collabora?ve Solar Procurement
17
Benefits • Discounted pricing through volume purchasing • Reduce transac?on costs &administra?ve burden • Reduce & stabilize electricity expenditures • Minimize workload for college staff • Leverage technical exper?se using a shared
collabora?ve resource pool • Decrease risk & complexity • S?mulate local job crea?on in clean energy sector • Lowers customer acquisi?on costs for vendors • Reduce GHG emissions from college opera?ons • Localize environmental & health benefits
Collabora?ve Solar Procurement
18
Includes 50 municipal sites • 10+ MW of solar PV • Solar thermal also evaluated
Largest municipal DG effort to date • Public schools • Government admin. buildings • Police departments
Mul>ple site types • Roocops • Carports • Solar shade structures
Results • Much faster deployment of solar • Expected volume discount: 10-‐15% • Transac?on & admin savings: 50% to 75% • Market leading contract terms
Case Study: Washington, D.C.
19
10,000+ MWh
Generated Annually
$7 Million Saved
10+ MW at 50 Sites
$16.5M Economic
Impact
68 Jobs Created
7,000 tons CO2e
Displaced Annually
Results
Case Study: Washington, D.C.
20
Opportuni?es • Boun?ful low hanging fruit • Increase bargaining power • Reduce risk and uncertainty • Achieve college clean energy goals • Bolster student recruitment efforts • Establish new career pathways • Demonstrate community leadership
Challenges • Limited staff ?me and resources • Compe?ng opera?onal priori?es • Business model viability under current
policy framework & rate structures • 2017 expira?on of federal incen?ves
Looking Forward
Optony develops and deploys solar best prac?ces across the en?re solar project lifecycle for government agencies, schools and commercial organiza?ons. Optony has been involved in over 3GW of project ac?vity globally. Working with clients across all phases of solar projects creates deep insight into true performance drivers which is used to reduce costs and improve performance at any stage in the process.
Program Management
FeasibilityAssessment
ProcurementManagement
Project Management
SystemOptimization
MaximumSolar
Benefit
22
Award Winning Pubic Sector Project
Award Winning Pubic Sector Project
Mul*ple Grant-‐Winner for Solar Market
Transforma*on
About Optony Inc.