visioncards - columbia heights...teamworks international, inc. 7037 20th avenue north centerville,...
TRANSCRIPT
Columbia Heights Public Schools
VisionCards
December 28, 2012
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
1
Prepared by
Dennis Cheesebrow
Founder and Principal
TeamWorks International, Inc.
7037 20th Avenue North
Centerville, Minnesota 55038
w. 651-429-7340 c.612-387-0827
Julie Goldsmith
Senior Consultant
TeamWorks International, Inc.
7037 20th Avenue North
Centerville, Minnesota 55038
w. 651-429-7340 c.612-834-5689
Prepared for
Kathy Kelly Superintendent
Columbia Heights Public Schools
1440 49th Ave NE
Columbia Heights MN 55421
Phone: (763) 528-4436 Email: [email protected]
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
2
Introduction The district administrators met for a one day, guided session on the development of District VisionCards, as designed by TeamWorks International and its Education Leadership System (ELS) for the alignment of adults around student learning and development.
In the graphic above, the Strategic Roadmap is a one page document, stewarded by the Board of Education in consultation with the District and community which sets out the Mission, Core Values, Vision and Strategic Directions of the district. The Strategic Roadmap is an act of governance. The VisionCards are an act and tool of district management by defining the measures and metrics of achieving the Vision and organized around the six (6) District Strategic Directions. The VisionCards will become the data source driver of the District Operational Plan and the School and Department Annual Improvement Plans as a act of Consultation. The performance of the Improvement Plans will be reported back to the Board of Education on a scheduled basis throughout the year in Monitoring Reports. Monitoring Reports form the basis of district accountability and Superintendent evaluation.
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
3
Columbia Heights Public Schools
STRATEGIC ROADMAP May 2010
Mission Statement Our Core Purpose
Columbia Heights Public Schools create worlds of opportunity for every learner in partnership with supportive small-town communities
by challenging all to discover their talents, unleash their potential, and develop tools for lifelong success.
Core Values: What Drives Our Word and Actions Community: it’s about all of us, all the time Excellence: to be our best, expect our best Collaboration: working together for common goals Integrity: honesty Respect: honor who we are, accepting of our differences Courage: facing challenges with hope & persistence Innovation: finding new ways to excel
Vision 2015 What We Intend To Create Academic Excellence with access to flexible programming and options designed around student needs
An image of pride which attracts and retains students and families
All have a voice and place with differences being our assets
Innovative technology for engaged learning, effective communication and preparation for success
Community culture of collaborative partnerships
Best practices and resource management; “We do school well”
Irresistible employment with creative and collegial staff
Strategic Directions Focus of Our Time and Resources A. Expand access & opportunities by turbo charging what works &
redesigning what needs to be better
B. Innovate to close the achievement gap with accountability and efficiency
C. Know & honor who we are to build strong relationships
D. Acknowledge and address tensions & opportunities for employments & partnership between employees
E. “Tell our story,” brand development, reputation management, to increase partnership & enrollment
F. Remain fiscally responsible
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
4
VisionCard System
Early Childhood
Grades K - 5
Grades K - 8
Grades 6 - 12
Grades 9 - 12
PreK - 12
District
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
5
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction A: Expand access and opportunities by turbo charging what works and redesigning what needs to be better
Measure Wt Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
I N S T R U C T I O N
50 %
A1: Use of articulated, standards-based curriculum
15 %
Less than 75 % of all classrooms
75 – 79 % of all classrooms
80 – 84 % of all classrooms
85 – 89 % of all classrooms
90 % + of all classrooms
A2: Licensed staff actively engaged in PLC’s 4 questions monthly at the minimum
15 %
Less than 30% of all licensed staff
30- 49% of all licensed staff
50 - 69% of all licensed staff
70 - 89% of all licensed staff
95% + of all licensed staff
2012 - 2013
A3: Use of formative student learning data to differentiate instruction
20 %
Less than 75 % of all classrooms
75 – 79 % of all classrooms
80 – 84 % of all classrooms
85 – 89 % of all classrooms
90 % + of all classrooms
2013-2014
A4: Use of effective teaching strategies resulting in student engagement in the learning objectives though walk-through protocol feedback and coaching
25 %
Less than 50 % of all teachers
50 – 69 % of all teachers
70 – 80 % of all teachers
81 – 89 % of all teachers
90 % + of all teachers 2012 - 2013
A5: Presence and use of classroom - embedded 21
st Century learning
15 %
Less than 50 % of all classrooms
50 – 69 % of all classrooms
70 – 80 % of all classrooms
81 – 89 % of all classrooms
90 % + of all classrooms
2013 - 2014
A6: Percentage of evaluated teaching staff at the basic/ proficient for non-tenured and proficient /distinguished level for tenured on instruction measures
10 %
Less than 50 % of all teachers
50 - 59% of all teachers
60 - 69% of all teachers
70 - 79% of all teachers
80% + of all teachers 2014-2015
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
6
S U P P O R T
30 %
A7: Presence of multi-tiered interventions for academics Reading and Math 2012 Science 2013
30 %
Less than 75 % of all Students
75 – 79 % of all Students
80 – 84 % of all Students
85 – 89 % of all Students
90 % + of all Students 2012-2013
A8: Presence of multi-tiered interventions for behavior RC / PBiS / DD
30 %
Less than 30 % of all classrooms
30 – 50 % of all classrooms
51 – 79 % of all classrooms
81 – 89 % of all classrooms
90 % + of all classrooms
2013 -
2014
A9: Presence of elements of STEAM curriculum and classroom instruction - grades K-12
20 %
Less than 20 % of all classrooms
20 – 29 % of all classrooms
30 –39 % of all classrooms
40 – 49 % of all classrooms
50 % + of all classrooms
2013 -
2014
A10: Presence of Achievement Via Individual Determination (AVID) strategies grades 9-12
20 %
Less than 50 % of all classrooms
50 – 59 % of all classrooms
60 – 69 % of all classrooms
70 – 79 % of all classrooms
80 % + of all classrooms
2012 -
2013
A11: Parent involvement (student achievement Examples: Parent Portal
% Less than 50 % of 50 – 59 % of parents 60 – 69 % of parents 70 – 79 % of parents 80 % + of parents 2013 -
2014
A12: 1-5 Participation in arts, activities and athletics
30 – 34 % of students are engaged
35 – 39 % of students are engaged
40 – 44 % of students are engaged
45 - 49 % of students are engaged
50 % + of students are engaged
P A R T I C I P A T I O N
20 %
A13: 6-12 Participation in arts, activities and athletics
30 %
Less than 65 % of students are engaged
65 – 69 % of students are engaged
70 – 74 % of students are engaged
75 – 79 % of students are engaged
80 % + of students are engaged
2012 -
2013
A14: Participation gap between student groups participating in arts, activities and athletics (groups include gender, F/R, ethnicity)
30 %
30% - 26% gap 25% - 21% gap 20% - 16% gap 15% - 10% gap >10% gap 2012 -
2013
A15: Parent engagement in points of contact grades E – 12 Examples: attendance at student events, volunteering in schools, PTO etc.
-
20 %
Less than 50 % of parents surveyed self identify more than one point of contact with district beyond conferences
50 – 59 % of parents surveyed self identify more than one point of contact with district beyond conferences
60 – 69 % of parents surveyed self identify more than one point of contact with district beyond conferences
70 – 79 % of parents surveyed self identify more than one point of contact with district beyond conferences
80 % + of parents surveyed self identify more than one point of contact with district beyond conferences
2012 -
2013
A16: Participation in Early Childhood programming
20 %
<40% of resident children are screened at age 5
40% - 49% of resident children are screened at age 5
50% - 59% of resident children are screened at age 5
60% - 69% of resident children are screened at age 5
70% + of resident children are screened at age 5
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
7
VisionCard A Weighted Score
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
8
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction B: Innovate to close the achievement gap with accountability and efficiency
Measure Wt. Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
G R O W T H
40 %
B1: NWEA MAP Growth Math by Student
20 %
<45% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
45% - 54% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
55% - 64% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
65% - 74% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
75% + of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
2012 -
2013
<45% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
45% - 54% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
55% - 64% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
65% - 74% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
75% + of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
2012 -
2013
B2: NWEA MAP Growth Reading by Student
30 %
<45% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
45% - 54% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
55% - 64% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
65% - 74% of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
75% + of elementary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
2012 -
2013
<45% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
45% - 54% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
55% - 64% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
65% - 74% of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
75% + of secondary students meet or exceed their annual growth targets
2012 -
2013
B3: Percentage of students by student group meeting NWEA MAP growth target.
20 %
Greater than 40 % difference between any student group to target
30 - 39 % difference between any student group to target
20 - 29 % difference between any student group to target
10 - 19 % difference between any student group to target
Less than 10 % difference between any student group to target
2012 -
2013
B4: Curriculum Based Management (CBM) Reading – K-5
30 %
<35 % of Tier II and III students assessed twice monthly using CBMs
35% - 49% of Tier II and III students assessed twice monthly using CBMs
50% - 64% of Tier II and III students assessed twice monthly using CBMs
65% - 80% of Tier II and III students assessed twice monthly using CBMs
80% + of Tier II and III students assessed twice monthly using CBMs
2012 -
2013
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
9
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction B (continued): Innovate to close the achievement gap with accountability and efficiency
Measure Wt. Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
P R O F I C I E N C Y
30 %
B5: Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA) Reading scores all grades tested
30 %
<60% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
60% - 64% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
65% - 69% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
70% - 74% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
75% + of all elementary students assessed are proficient
2012 -
2013
<49% of all secondary students assessed are proficient
50% - 54% all secondary students assessed are proficient
55% - 59% all secondary students assessed are proficient
60% - 64% of all secondary students assessed are proficient
65% + of all secondary students assessed are proficient
B6: MCA Math scores all grades tested
30 %
<60% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
60% - 64% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
65% - 69% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
70% - 74% of all elementary students assessed are proficient
75% + of all elementary students assessed are proficient
2012 -
2013
<35% of all secondary students assessed are proficient
35% - 39% all secondary students assessed are proficient
40% - 44% all secondary students assessed are proficient
45% - 49% of all secondary students assessed are proficient
50% + of all secondary students assessed are proficient
B7: MCA Science scores all grades tested
10 %
<35% of all students assessed are proficient
35% - 39% all students assessed are proficient
40% - 44% all students assessed are proficient
45% - 49% of all students assessed are proficient
50% + of all students assessed are proficient
2012 -
2013
B8: MCA gap to standard for student groups in Reading or Math
30 %
Greater than 45 % difference for any student group to standard
35 - 44 % difference for any student group to standard
25 - 34 % difference for any student group to standard
15 - 24 % difference for any student group to standard
Less than 14 % difference for any student group to standard
2012 -
2013
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
10
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction B (Continued): Innovate to close the achievement gap with accountability and efficiency
Measure Wt. Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
R E A D I N E S S
20 %
A C T
50 %
B9: ACT Plan and Explore: college readiness benchmarks in each of the 4 content areas reported
30 %
Less than 20% of all students tested achieve college readiness benchmarks
20 – 29 % of all students tested achieve college readiness benchmarks
30 to 39 % of all students tested achieve college readiness benchmarks
40 to 59 % of all students tested achieve college readiness benchmarks
Greater than 60% of all students tested achieve college readiness benchmarks
2012 -
2013
B10: Equity in ACT Plan and Explore: college readiness benchmarks
30 %
Greater than 40 % difference between highest and lowest student group
30 to 40 % difference between highest and lowest student group
20 to 29 % difference between highest and lowest student group
10 to 19 % difference between highest and lowest student group
Less than 10 % difference between highest and lowest student group
2012 -
2013
B11 ACT participation grades 11 – 12
10 %
Less than 25 % of students participating
25 - 40 % of students participating
41 - 55 % of students participating
56 - 69 % of students participating
70 % + of students participating
2012 -
2013
B12 ACT composite scores of students in district since 8
th
grade
30 %
17 or below average composite score
18-19 average composite score
20-21 average composite score
22-23 average composite score
23 + average composite score
2012 -
2013
B E H A V 20 %
B13 Referrals out-of-class (6-12 only)
50 %
Greater than 3,000 referrals per year
3,000 - 2,500 referrals per year
2,499 - 2,000 referrals per year
1,999 - 1,500 referrals per year
Less than 1500 referrals per year
2012 -2013
B14: Difference between student groups in referrals out-of-class
30 %
Greater than 40 % difference for any student group to demographics
30 - 39 % difference for any student group to demographics
20 - 29 % difference for any student group to demographics
10 - 19 % difference for any student group to demographics
Less than 10 % difference for any student group to demographics
2012-2013
B15 Out-of-school suspension incidents
20 %
Greater than 425 incidents per year
425 - 400 incidents per year
399 - 375 incidents per year
374 - 350 incidents per year
Less than 350 incidents per year
2012 -2013
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
11
P O S T H S 30 %
B16 Advance Placement (AP) participation and success
20 %
< 20% of students in a graduating class take at least one AP test and score 3 or better
20 - 39% of students in a graduating class take at least one AP test and score 3 or better
40-49% of students in a graduating class take at least one AP test and score 3 or better
51-60% of students in a graduating class take at least one AP test and score 3 or better
> 60% of students in a graduating class take at least one AP test and score 3 or better
2012-2013
B17 On-Track-to-Graduate rate for grades 8-12
30 %
<80% of students on track per grading period
80% - 84% of students on track per grading period
85% - 89% of students on track per grading period
90% - 94% of students on track per grading period
95% + of students on track per grading period
2013 -
2014
B18 Graduation rate (4 year cohort model)
30 %
Lower 75 % of all districts in the State
Top 25 % of all districts in the State
Top 20 % of all districts in the State
Top 15 % of all districts in the State
Top 10 % of all districts in the State
2012 -2013
B19 Post-secondary enrollment entrance rate
10 %
<50% of graduating class enter into postsecondary options within one year
50 - 59% of graduating class enter into postsecondary options within one year
60 - 69% of graduating class enter into postsecondary options within one year
70 - 79 % of graduating class enter into postsecondary options within one year
80% + of graduating class enter into postsecondary options within one year
2012 -2013
B20 College entrance rate after a readiness program Achievement Via Individual Determination (AVID) /Admission Possible
10 %
<60% of students 60% - 69% of students
70% - 79% of students
80% - 89% of students
90 % + of students 2012 -
2013
VisionCard B Weighted Score
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
12
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction C: Know and honor who we are to build strong relationships
Measure Wt Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
C1 increase enrollment in pre-ap & ap classes for students of color commensurate with white peers
5 %
>40% gap between other student groups and white students
40% - 31% gap between other student groups and white students
30% - 21% gap between other student groups and white students
20% - 10% gap between other student groups and white students
<10% gap between other students groups and white students
C2 Enriched curriculum with a variety of cultural perspectives in 80% of courses
10 %
<20% of courses contain enriched curriculum
20% - 39% of courses contain enriched curriculum
40% - 59% of courses contain enriched curriculum
60% - 79% of courses contain enriched curriculum
80% + of courses contain enriched curriculum
2013 - 2014
C3 Family involvement programs (REACH) for targeted families of color
5 %
<40% of targeted families participating
40% - 49% of targeted families participating
50% - 59% of targeted families participating
60% - 69% of targeted families participating
70% + of targeted families participating
C4 Equity Teams established at each building with a variety of employee groups
10 %%
1-2 buildings out of 6 implementing plan
3/6 buildings implementing plan
4/6 buildings implementing plan
5/6 buildings implementing plan
6/6 buildings implementing plan
2013 - 2014
C5 Cultural Family Events with community members sharing
5 %
<2 times per year per building
2 times per year per building
3 times per year per building
4 times per year per building
>4 times per year per building
C6 Reduce suspensions and referrals of students of color to reflect general population
20 %
>25% difference between referred student demographics and the general population
25% - 21% difference between referred student demographics and the general population
20% - 16% difference between referred student demographics and the general population
15% - 10% difference between referred student demographics and the general population
<10% difference between referred student demographics and the general population
C7 Licensed staff demographics as compared to student populations (white – color)
5 %
Lowest 2 out of our District cohort group
Top 8 out of our District cohort group
Top 6 out of our District cohort group
Top 4 out of our District cohort group
Top 2 out of our District cohort group
C8 Students/families feel welcomed into district/schools measured by family satisfaction (climate survey)
30 %
<60% of respondents surveyed report feeling welcomed and safe at school
60% - 69% of respondents surveyed report feeling welcomed and safe at school
70% - 79% of respondents surveyed report feeling welcomed and safe at school
80% - 90% of respondents surveyed report feeling welcomed and safe at school
90% + of respondents surveyed report feeling welcomed and safe at school
C9 Digital divide (access) after school hours
10 %
<45% of students surveyed report access to technology
45% - 59% of students surveyed report access to technology
60% - 74% of students surveyed report access to technology
75% - 89% of students surveyed report access to technology
90% + of students surveyed report access to technology
VisionCard C Weighted Performance
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
13
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction D: Acknowledge and address tensions & opportunities for employments & partnership between employees
Measure Wt Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
D1 Percentage of new hires who completed the on-boarding process (licensed)
10 %
<70% complete on-boarding process
70% – 74% complete on-boarding process
75% - 79% complete on-boarding process
80% - 84% complete on-boarding process
85% + complete on-boarding process
D2 Percentage of new hires who completed the on-boarding process (non-licensed)
10 %
<10% complete on-boarding process
10% - 34% complete on-boarding process
35% - 59% complete on-boarding process
60% - 85% complete on-boarding process
85% + complete on-boarding process
D3 Retention of desired employees
25 %
<90% planned retention
90% - 91% planned retention
92% - 93% planned retention
94% - 95% planned retention
95% + planned retention
D4 Evaluation completed within contract evaluation period
15 %
<80% completed 80% - 84% completed 85% - 89% completed 90% - 94% completed 95% + completed
D5 Staff satisfaction with working conditions
10 %
<50% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
50% - 54% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
55% - 59% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
60% - 69% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
70% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
D6 Staff satisfaction with labor/ management communications
10 %
<50% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
50% - 54% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
55% - 59% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
60% - 69% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
70% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
D7 Staff satisfaction with informal recognition at the building level
10 %
<50% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
50% - 54% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
55% - 59% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
60% - 69% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
70% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
D8 Staff satisfaction with informal feedback from building administrators
10 %
<50% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
50% - 54% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
55% - 59% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
60% - 69% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
70% of staff surveyed are satisfied to highly satisfied
VisionCard D Weighted Performance Score
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
14
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction E: “Tell our story,” brand development, reputation management, to increase partnership & enrollment
Measure Wt Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
E1 Market share of school-age children in district schools
30 %
<60% of E-12 students living in district
60% - 69% of E-12 students living in district
70% - 79% of E-12 students living in district
80% - 89% of E-12 students living in district
90% + of E-12 students living in district
E2 Columbia Heights Public Schools (CHPS) students and families connected using digital media
15 %
<35% of students and families reporting a connection to district communications or district website
35% - 49% of students and families reporting a connection to district communications or district website
50% - 64% of students and families reporting a connection to district communications or district website
65% - 79% of students and families reporting a connection to district communications or district website
80% + of students and families reporting a connection to district communications or district website
2013 - 2014
E3 CHPS staff demonstrate the district’s core values on their everyday work
15 %
<40% of staff demonstrate core values
40% - 58% of staff demonstrate core values
59% - 77% of staff demonstrate core values
78% - 95% of staff demonstrate core values
95% + of staff demonstrate core values
2013 - 2014
E4 Percentage of performing arts and activities communications which include the mission of CHPS
10 %
<40% communicating the Mission
40% - 58% communicating the Mission
59% - 77% communicating the Mission
78% - 95% communicating the Mission
95% + communicating the Mission
E5 District published materials with CHPS logo and mission statement
10 %
<40% have logo and Mission displayed
40% - 58% have logo and Mission displayed
59% - 77% have logo and Mission displayed
78% - 95% have logo and Mission displayed
95% + have logo and Mission displayed
E6 Favorable responses to 3 universal climate questions embedded within all district surveys/evaluations
20 %
<45% of those surveyed provide favorable responses to all 3 questions
45% - 54% of those surveyed provide favorable responses to all 3 questions
55% - 64% of those surveyed provide favorable responses to all 3 questions
65% - 74% of those surveyed provide favorable responses to all 3 questions
75% + of those surveyed provide favorable responses to all 3 questions
VisionCard E Weighted Performance Score
Columbia Heights Public Schools
November, 2011
15
Columbia Heights Public Schools
Strategic Direction F: Remain fiscally responsible
Measure Wt Level 1 Intervention
1.0 – 1.9
Level 2 High Concern
2.0 – 2.9
Level 3 Baseline 3.0 – 3.9
Level 4 Progressing
4.0 – 4.9
Level 5 Vision 5.0 +
Score Trend Line
F1 Unrestricted fund balance
20 %
Negative fund balance 0 – 1% fund balance 2% - 3% fund balance 4% - 5% fund balance 6% + fund balance
F2 Annual variation from established budgets: All schools and departments
25 %
>2.5% variation from budget
2.5% – 2.1% variation from budget
2.0% - 1.6% variation from budget
1.5% - 1.0% variation from budget
<1% variation from budget
F3 Budget alignment % of general fund applied directly to the classroom 200, 300, 400 UFARS program codes
10 %
45% - 49% 50% - 54%
55% - 59%
60% - 65%
65% +
F4 Approved capital projects completed on time
10 %
<60% completed on time
60% - 69% completed on time
70% -79% completed on time
80% - 89% completed on time
90% + completed on time
F5 Approved capital projects completed within budget
10 %
<60% completed within budget
60% - 69% completed within budget
70% -79% completed within budget
80% - 89% completed within budget
90% + completed within budget
F6 Quality of facilities & grounds climate survey
15 %
<20% of those surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction
20% - 34% % of those surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction
35% - 49% % of those surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction
50% - 64% % of those surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction
65% + % of those surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction
F7 Operating levy in comparison to similar metro districts
10 %
Lowest quartile of similar districts
Lowest half of similar districts
Highest half of similar districts
Highest quartile of similar districts
Highest quintile of similar districts
F8 Community satisfaction with district financial decisions
10 %
<20% of community member surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction with districts decisions
20% - 34% of community member surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction with districts decisions
35% - 49% of community member surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction with districts decisions
50% - 64% of community member surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction with districts decisions
65% + of community member surveyed, report satisfaction to high satisfaction with districts decisions
VisionCard F Weighted Performance Score