visual field examination

66
VISUAL FIELD EXAMINATION AND INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATED PERIMETRY IN GLAUCOMA DR PAAVAN KALRA DEPARTMENT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY S P MEDICAL COLLEGE BIKANER

Upload: paavan-kalra

Post on 21-Apr-2017

52.492 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Visual Field Examination

VISUAL FIELD EXAMINATIONAND

INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATED PERIMETRY IN GLAUCOMA

DR PAAVAN KALRADEPARTMENT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY

S P MEDICAL COLLEGEBIKANER

Page 2: Visual Field Examination

VISUAL FIELD• That part of environment wherein a steadily fixating eye can

detect visual stimulus.

• BASIS - presence of Photoreceptors and corresponding visual pathways upto the periphery of retina away from point of fixation i e fovea.

• IMPORTANCE – Reflects topographic sensitivity of various foci on retina and corresponding visual apparatus.

Resolution – Acuitydifferential light sensitivity and contrastcolourflickermotion

Page 3: Visual Field Examination

PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS

Page 4: Visual Field Examination

VISUAL ACUITY

Page 5: Visual Field Examination

DIFFERENTIAL LIGHT SENSITIVITY

Basis of most modern visual field examination methods

TRAQUAIR – “HILL OF VISION IN THE SEA OF DARKNESS”

Page 6: Visual Field Examination

FACTORSApparent size of spot – real size

-- distance from eyeDuration of stimulus Background illumination Stimulus intensityContrast ColourPatient factorsLight / dark adaptationVisionRefractive statusEducation , attentiveness, cooperation

Page 7: Visual Field Examination

Stereoscopic field

Page 8: Visual Field Examination

PHYSIOLOGICAL BLIND SPOT

Corresponding to optic nerve head

15 deg temporal to point of fixation

Span – 5 deg horizontal -- 7 deg vertical

Two thirds below the horizontal meridian

Page 9: Visual Field Examination

COLOUR FIELD

• Point at which passing from periphery to centre, the colour first becomes evident

• Peripheral to the limit, the object is perceptible but appears grey

• First red and green are used followed by blue and yellow

• Extent of field for objects of same size and intensitywhite > yellow > blue > red > green

Page 10: Visual Field Examination

VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS

Page 11: Visual Field Examination

• SCOTOMA : focal region of abnormally decreased sensitivity surrounded by an area of normal sensitivity

ABSOLUTERELATIVE

POSITIVENEGATIVE

• DEPRESSION : is an area of reduced sensitivity without a surrounding area of normal sensitivity

appears as denting of isopters

Page 12: Visual Field Examination

• Generalized depression(both peripheral and central contraction)

e g cataract

• Peripheral Contraction – retinitis pigmentosa

• Temporal contraction - age

Page 13: Visual Field Examination

• Hemifield defect :B/L - Hemianopias

homonymous heteronymous

• Altitudinal defect

Page 14: Visual Field Examination

• Central scotoma• Pericentral • Centrocaecal scotoma

• Arcuate scotomasSeidel scotomaparacentral scotomaBjerrum scotoma

• Nasal step• Ring – double arcuate• Split fixation• Barring of blind spot

Page 15: Visual Field Examination
Page 16: Visual Field Examination

EXAMINATION METHODOLOGY

Page 17: Visual Field Examination

KINETIC• Test object of particular size and intensity is passed from

non seeing area to seeing area along a particular meridian at the rate of 3 – 5 deg per sec

• Repeated every 15 – 30 deg• To find points in the visual field of equal sensitivities –

ISOPTER (Groenouw) marking• Intensity and size of stimulus is varied to mark various

isopters• Thus 2 D Contour map of the hill of vision is made• Extent of scotomas and blind spot marked from inside

out

Page 18: Visual Field Examination

STATIC• The location, size and duration of stimulus is kept constant

and the luminance is gradually increased until seen• Actual estimation of sensitivity ( THRESHOLD ) of each

point is made out• SUPRA THRESHOLD stimulus used for screening

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------IMPORTANT :

one eye is tested at a time, other is occluded

fixation of the patient has to be steady and is monitored throughout the test

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 19: Visual Field Examination

CLINICAL METHODS GROSS DEFECTS

Page 20: Visual Field Examination

PROJECTION OF LIGHT

In patients with very poor vision –> HM + to PL +e g dense cataracts

-dark room, other eye occluded-patients are constantly instructed to look straight to avoid

tendency to deviate eye towards light source-light shown onto 4 quadrants from 30-50 cm and switched

on and off-Patient tells about the direction of light source

Accurate in all quadInaccurate in some quadInaccurate in all quad

Page 21: Visual Field Examination

HAND IDENTIFICATION

Other eye is occluded

Patient fixates on the nose of examiner

Examiner keeps both hands on either side of eye 50 cm away

One hand absent or indistinct – hemianopic defect

Either palms or fingers of both hands missing / faint – altitudinal defect

Page 22: Visual Field Examination

FINGER COUNTING

Varying no of fingers are held in each quadrant, 1 m and 45 deg from fixation

If unable to count, fingers are brought closer to fixation, until patient sees (kinetic)

Page 23: Visual Field Examination

RED DESATURATION

Can be confirmed kinetically

Patient has to indicate when color appears to change

Can also be used to compare the two eyes in case of optic neuropathy

Page 24: Visual Field Examination

CONFRONTATION(kinetic)

Patient’s and examiner at same level

Compares the visual field of eye of patient with opposite eye of the examiner in a plane perpendicular to line of gaze

Red pin is particularly useful for neurological cases

GROSS PERIMETRY (kinetic)

Follows facial contour

Page 25: Visual Field Examination

AMSLER GRIDFor Central 10 deg ( static )

Other eye occluded

Near correction given

Chart at held 28-30 cm – each small square subtends angle of 1 deg

Patient fixates at central dot – tells whether all corners are seen simultaneously and about lines- parallel, distorted, missing

Can be used for mapping blind spot – patient fixates at edge of grid

Page 26: Visual Field Examination

EQUIPMENTS

Page 27: Visual Field Examination

PERIMETRY

Examination and quantification of visual field by using stimulus of various sizes, intensities and colours

Page 28: Visual Field Examination

ARC PERIMETERS eg LISTER’s PERIMETER

• Only kinetic• Peripheral charting

Page 29: Visual Field Examination

BJERRUM’s SCREEN ( CAMPIMETRY)

• Patient sits at 1 or 2 m from flat screen• Kinetic and static• For central 30 deg only• Done under subdued lighting

Page 30: Visual Field Examination

GOLDMANN’s PERIMETER

• Bowl type• Standardization• Both kinetic and static• Peripheral as well as central

Page 31: Visual Field Examination

AUTOMATED PERIMETRYstandard automated perimetry

HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER OCTOPUS

• STATIC perimetry

• Measurement of threshold values

• STATPAC (HFA)- Comparison to normative data

• Inbuilt program for analysis – diagnosis and progression

Page 32: Visual Field Examination

ADVANTAGES• Removal of examiner variability• More sensitive to subtle field defects• Reproducibility• Retests abnormal points automatically• Gives reliability parameters like

fixation monitoring – HEIJL KRAKAU methodGaze trackingFalse positiveFalse negative

Page 33: Visual Field Examination

SHORT COMINGS• EXPENSIVE• Learning curves• Difficult to follow by older debilitated patients especially

neurological problems• Not infallible – only 1 % of field is actually examined• Diagnosis and management decisions based on

correlation with other clinical findings

A well performed tangent screen examination is better than poorly carried out automated perimetry

In neurological patients, clinical methods may be the only possible assessment techniques

Page 34: Visual Field Examination

• WHITE ON WHITE

• BACKGROUND ILLUMINATION - 31.5 asb

• STIMULUS SIZE – GOLDMANN - III

• DURATION OF SPOT EXPOSURE 0.2s

Page 35: Visual Field Examination

PROGRAMS / PATTERNS30-2 – gold standard24-210-2MACULARNasal step program – additional 12 locations upto 50 deg

nasalperipheral 60 and 60-4 progEstermann test – for binocular 120 deg field

Page 36: Visual Field Examination
Page 37: Visual Field Examination

MACULA PROGRAM :16 locations within the central 5° with 2° spacing. Each location is tested three times

Page 38: Visual Field Examination

STRATEGIES

SUPRATHRESHOLD – screening

Fixed suprathreshold

contour suprathreshold

3 zone suprathreshold

Page 39: Visual Field Examination

FULL THRESHOLDBRACKETING STRATEGY( staircase)

– GOLD STANDARD

FASTPAC

Estimation of SHORT TERM FLUCTATIONS at 10 prefixed points

Page 40: Visual Field Examination

SWEDISH INTERACTIVE TESTING ALGORITHM (SITA)

SITA STANDARD ( Bracketing strategy based)

SITA FAST ( FASTPAC based)

Analyzes patients response and responds accordinglyDecreases overall no of stimuli presented, hence test

durationPaces the test according to patients speedDoesn’t estimate Short term Fluctuations

Page 41: Visual Field Examination

• Selection of adequate test• Proper environment• Comfortable sitting position• Adequate size of pupil >3mm• Adequate Near correction• Proper explanation – running of demonstration• Reassurance – not all points will be seen

- test can be paused by keeping the response button pressed

Page 42: Visual Field Examination
Page 43: Visual Field Examination

Patient data• Name, DOB, eye• Vision, refraction,• Pupil diameter

Test data• Date and time• Program and strategy• Background

illumination• Test size, color,

duration, interval

ZONE 1 : REPRODUCIBILITY

Page 44: Visual Field Examination

ZONE 2 : RELIABILITY• Fixation monitor• Fixation target – central, small diamond,

large diamond, bottom LED• Test duration

• Reliability indicesFixation losses ( Heijl Krakau) <20 %Gaze tracking

False positives < 33%(trigger happy)

False negatives < 33 %

Foveal threshold

Page 45: Visual Field Examination
Page 46: Visual Field Examination

ZONE 3 : GREY SCALE• Based on actual threshold values at each location• General identification• Patient information

Page 47: Visual Field Examination

ZONE 4 :TOTAL DEVIATION PLOT

• Numerical plot – indicates by how much decibels is each point depressed compared to mean value in normal population of similar age

• Probability plot- grey scale indicates the probability of occurrence of the deviation in normal population

Generalized depression due to media opacities, refractive error, miosis may hamper appearance of a pattern

Page 48: Visual Field Examination

ZONE 5 : PATTERN DEVIATION PLOT

• Numerical - calculated by adjustment for generalized depression or elevation of visual field

• Thus brings out pattern• Probability plot • Significance - ANDERSON’S CRITERIA

Page 49: Visual Field Examination

ZONE 6 : GLOBAL INDICESsingle numbers to denote whole field

• MEAN DEVIATION : average loss of sensitivity from normal age matched population along with probability

calculated from total deviation plot

• PATTERN STANDARD DEVIATION : range over which change of sensitivity at all the points has occurred, along with probability

compensates for effect of generalized depression or elevation of field on mean deviation value

local defects affect PSD > MD

• SHORT TERM FLUCTUATIONS• CORRECTED PATTERN STANDARD DEVIATION

Page 50: Visual Field Examination

ZONE 7 : GLAUCOMA HEMIFIELD TEST

• PLAIN ENGLISH LANGUAGE MESSAGE

• Comparison of 5 clusters of points in superior hemifield with mirror images in inferior hemifield

Page 51: Visual Field Examination

OUTSIDE NORMAL LIMITSall cluster pairs differ @ p < 1% OR1 cluster pair differs @ p < 0.5%

BORDERLINEhemifields differ @ p < 3%

GENERAL REDUCTION OF SENSITIVITYoverall field depressed @ p < 0.5%

ABNORMAL HIGH SENSITIVITYoverall field elevated( best 15 % points) @ p < 0.5 %

WITHIN NORMAL LIMITS

Page 52: Visual Field Examination

ANDERSON and PATELLA CRITERIA• 3 or more congrous ‘non edge points’ in typical arcuate area

on 30-2 program

depressed @ p< 5 % with at least one point @ p<1 %

•PSD / CPSD @ p< 5%

•GHT – outside normal limits

Must be demonstrated on 2 field tests

Page 53: Visual Field Examination

CLINICAL CORRELATION : MUST

DISC and NERVE FIBRE LAYER

Page 54: Visual Field Examination

OVERVIEW

Page 55: Visual Field Examination

CHANGE ANALYSIS

Page 56: Visual Field Examination

GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION ANALYSIS

Page 57: Visual Field Examination

ARTEFACTS• OBSTRUCTION

RIM ARTEFACTSPTOSISMEDIA OPACITIESANGIOSCOTOMA

• MIOSIS

• REFRACTION ARTEFACTS• High power plus and minus lenses

Page 58: Visual Field Examination
Page 59: Visual Field Examination
Page 60: Visual Field Examination
Page 61: Visual Field Examination
Page 62: Visual Field Examination

NEWER METHODS

Page 63: Visual Field Examination

SHORT WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETERY“BLUE ON YELLOW”detects glaucomatous defects 3-5 years earlier than SAPhigh fluctuation rates

Page 64: Visual Field Examination

FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETRY

Based on frequency doubling illusion

Test stimulus – series of white and black bands flickering at 25 Hz ( low spatial frequency & high temporal frequncy)

Detects damage to Magnocellular Ganglion cells

C – 20 17 points – screening

N – 30 19 points – diagnosis n management

Page 65: Visual Field Examination

RANDOM DOT MOTION PERIMETRY

Patient has to tell direction in which dots are moving

HIGH PASS RESOLUTION PERIMETRY

Test resolution and not mere threshold detection

Page 66: Visual Field Examination

THANK YOU