visual fields in glaucoma
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
1/17
1
VISUAL FIELDS IN GLAUCOMA
Perimetry is d clinical assessment of the
VF
It serves in [a] Identifying abnormal fieldsie. Making diagnosis. [b] Quantitative
assessment of normal or abnormal fields
during follow-ups
Some methods may be better in diagnosis
than follow-up and vice-versa
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
2/17
2
Automated Static Perimetry
Standard in d last 2 decades
Newer ones are:
Short-wavelength automated perimetry[SWAP],
High-pass resolution perimetry,
and frequency-doubling technology[FDT]perimetry
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
3/17
3
PATTERNS OF NERVE LOSS
The hallmark is the nerve fiber bundledefect. Possible defects are:
Generalized depression
Paracentral scotoma
Arcuate or Bjerrum scotoma
Nasal step
Altitudinal defect
Temporal wedge
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
4/17
4
Patterns Contd
The superior and inferior poles of the opticnerve appear to be most susceptible toglaucomatous damage.
Double arcuate scotoma, may occur,resulting in profound peripheral vision loss
Typically, the central island of vision and
inferior temporal VF are retained until late The pt and the perimetrist can bring
variables into the result it is subjective
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
5/17
5
[L]Normal view, [R] Glaucomatous
view
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
6/17
6
Normal view vs Tubular vision
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
7/17
7
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
8/17
8
INTERPRETATION
First assess quality.
Percentage of fixation losses, the false
+ves & false ves Damaged areas demonstrate more
variability than normal areas.
Glaucomatous damage may cause anincrease in false-negative responses
All this will be used to assess pts reliability
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
9/17
9
ABNORMALITY
Normal VF show greatest sensitivity
centrally, falling steadily toward the
periphery
Study the Humphrey or Octopus field
machine generated numerical data.
An abnormal pattern deviation has greater
diagnostic specificity than a generalised
loss.
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
10/17
10
INTERPRETATION OF A SERIES
OF FIELDS Should meet 2 goals:
[a] Separating real change from ordinary
variation [b] To determine the likelihood that a
change is related to glaucomatous progression.
This is made easier with a good baseline, this is
why a reliable field is obtained early
Progression of existing defects or suspectednew ones should be reproducible on subsequent
examinations to establish their validity.
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
11/17
11
CORRELATION WITH OPTIC
DISC If no correlation other causes of visual lossshould be considered eg. ION, pituitary tumor,demyelinating or other neurologic disease,
especially in d following situations -Disc less cupped than indicated by field
-Disc pallor is more than cupping
-Progression of field loss seems excessive
-Pattern of VF is uncharacteristic -Field defect does not correlate with disc
abnormality
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
12/17
12
STAGING
After determining the presence of the
disease visual field examination is used to
stage the disease.
Shallow / isolated field defects are
characteristic of early glaucoma,
whereas extensive deep deficits,
encroaching fixation are characteristic of
late or end stage glaucoma
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
13/17
13
INTERPRETATION Contd
In patients with mild / moderate glaucoma
visual field examination is usually to
determine if disease progression has been
halted.
This would also hold true for patients with
advanced glaucoma.
In advanced glaucoma, assessing fixation
characteristics is important to plan ahead.
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
14/17
14
How often should the fields be
done ? Though there is no consensus guidelinesdo exist.
(1) If the results of the field test aresufficient to confirm the diagnosticconclusion, fields may be repeated at leastonce more (36).
A change in therapy on the basis of asingle abnormal visual field test is onlyrarely appropriate.
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
15/17
15
FOLLOW-UPS
Ocular hypertension : Establish abaseline and perform followup fields
on the basis of degree of risk fordeveloping glaucoma.
Patients with low IOP, negative familyhistory, or optic nerves that appear
healthy, test every one or two years. Patients with unstable high IOP or other
risk factors, every 3-6 months.
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
16/17
16
FOLLOW-UPS Contd
Stable glaucoma : Initially every 6-12months.
Patient compliance needs to be kept inmind.
Visual fields by measuring the cumulativedamage are sensitive to detect
progression especially when IOP appears to be well
controlled (assessment of compliance).
-
8/6/2019 Visual Fields in Glaucoma
17/17
17
FOLLOW-UPS Contd
Unstable glaucoma : One can ask for
several fields within a span of few months.
This would hold good people who have arelative contraindication to surgery.