visual performance of eyes in the grail study sumit garg, md · based on data from: anderson ha,...

18
Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD International Society of Presbyopia September 13, 2019

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail StudySumit Garg, MD

International Society of PresbyopiaSeptember 13, 2019

Page 2: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

LensGen Milestones

2

• 2012 - Company founded by Ramgopal Rao and Dr. Roger Steinert • 2013 - Awarded COSAT grant from Johnson & Johnson• 2014 - Raised $3.4M in early seed rounds • 2015 - Implanted first Juvene IOLs in pilot studies• 2017 - Closed $28M Series A Financing • 2019 - Initiated Grail Study in January • 2019 - Dr. Eric Donnenfeld presented Grail Study results at ASCRS • 2020 - Planning to initiate FDA Study in early 2020

Page 3: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

Accommodation with Age

3

10 year old

70 year old

45 year old

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Acc

omm

odat

ion

(dio

pter

s)

Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jul;49(7):2919-26. and Turner PL, Mainster MA. Circadian photoreception: ageing and the eye's important role in systemic health. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;92(11):1439-44.

Realities of Declining Vision

• 40’s – lens begins to stiffen and lose focus power

• 50’s – loss of accommodation and decreased night vision

• 65 plus – no accommodation, possible cataract and poor visual quality

Page 4: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

Market Opportunity

4

Surgeons• High patient satisfaction

(patients want to see at every distance)

• Low number of complaints (halos, glare & night vision)

• Simple, straight forward surgical procedure

• No additional chair time• Enhanced safety

Industry• Growth in Premium market• Larger Presbyopia market• Unique long-lived IP• Long term market viability• Platform technology

Premium Patients• Full range of vision

without contrast loss• Spectacle free vision• High quality vision –

No glare, No halos• Standard cataract –

No compromises• Enhanced safety Juvene

Page 5: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

LensGen Technology

5

Page 6: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

Juvene Emulates the Natural Crystalline Lens

6

Page 7: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

Clinical

Page 8: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

PRESBYOPIA Grail Study

8

• Fifty-four (54) of 59 eyes implanted

• Eleven (11) of 14 bilateral subjects 1-6 months post-op

• Eight (8) of 10 control eyes implanted

• Forty-four (44) eyes 1-6 months post-op

• Eleven (11) at 6 months follow-up

• Twenty three eyes (23) at 3 months follow-up

• Eighteen eyes (18) at 1 month follow-up

• Two eyes (2) no data at this time

• Zero (0) lens related adverse events

• 100% of bilateral subjects are spectacle independent

Page 9: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

PRESBYOPIA

0.48

0.25

0.00

0.050.09

0.15

0.20

0.27

0.38

0.55

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00-4.5-4-3.5-3-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.522.5

Vis

ual A

cuity

Diopters

Monocular Defocus Curve - Most Recent follow Up Data

Grail N=44 EDoF (Symfony*) N=62 Technis Monofocal* N=65

20/20

20/25

20/32

20/40

20/16

*FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED)

Grail Monocular Defocus Curves

9

66cm 40cm

Page 10: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

PRESBYOPIA

0.34

0.14

-0.03-0.01

0.010.05

0.090.13

0.26

0.41

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00-4.5-4-3.5-3-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.500.511.522.5

Vis

ual A

cu

ity

Diopters

Binocular Defocus Curve - Most Recent follow Up Data

Grail Binocular N=11 EDoF (Symfony SSED) Binocular N=62

20/20

20/25

20/32

20/40

20/16

66cm 40cm

Grail Binocular Defocus Curves

10

20/20+

20/25-

20/20-

Page 11: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

Bilateral Patient Satisfaction

11

QoV Questionnaire N=11 Eyes

Glare None

Halos None

Starbursts None

Hazy Vision None

Blurred Vision None

Distortion None

Double Vision None

Image Fluctuation None

Focusing Difficulty None

Judging Depth Perception None

ENHANCEDSAFETY

Page 12: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL 12

Closer to Emmetropia

Average -0.61 DStd. Dev. 0.48 D

Target vs. Achieved Post-op Refractive Error N=41

3.4

3.6

3.8

4

4.2

4.4

4.6

1 3 6 9 12A

nter

ior C

ham

ber D

epth

(mm

)Post-Operative Visit (months)

JRG NRE RGA YMS GRD

Paired samples t-test comparing lens position at month 12 to month 1 is

not significant (p = 0.704).

ELP Stability in Pilot Study N=5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

-2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00

Ach

ieve

d D

iop

tric

Ou

tco

me

Expected Dioptric Outcome

Page 13: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL 13

ENHANCEDSAFETY

6 MONTHS 22 MONTHS 33 MONTHS

Pilot Data – clinical experience 54 months

No PCO – Pristine Capsules

54 MONTHS

Page 14: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

Standard IOL Compromises

14

Compromises

• ELP Shift and Tilt

• Rotation

• PCO

• Vitreo-retinal Tension

Unacceptable for Premium IOL Patients

Page 15: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

EMMETROPIA

15

Biomimetic Capsule Filling

PATIENT BENEFITS

• Stable ELP

• Stable Refraction

• Minimal Rotation

• Negligible PCO

• Less Vitreo-retinal Tension

Satisfied Premium IOL Patients

Page 16: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

PRESBYOPIA Grail Study Summary – Bilateral Patients

16

No Glare, No Halos, No Glasses: • Full range of vision without splitting light from distance to near

• 100% of patients are spectacle independent • 100% of patients are 20/25 at distance and intermediate • 91% of patients are 20/32 at near

• Excellent QOV – no glare, halo or other dysphotopsia reported

Earlier Pilot Study Results:• Stable ELP and no loss of accommodative effect • No PCO in any eyes out to 54 months

Page 17: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

CONFIDENTIAL

Drug Delivery

Juvene Toric

The LensGen Platform

Juvene

Monofocal ToricLensGen Base Lens Biometric

Sensors

17

Current Development

Potential Future Develop Opportunities

PLUS

Monofocal

Page 18: Visual Performance of Eyes in the Grail Study Sumit Garg, MD · Based on data from: Anderson HA, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude

Thank You