walter c wright - gravity is a push

7/27/2019 Walter C Wright - Gravity is a Push

1/175

ABOUT THE AUTHORWalter C. Wright, Jr. has been working on his theory that gravity is apush between heavenly bodies for more than ten years and in thattime has generated a great deal of controversy as well as a largefollowing who believes his theory.Born on June 21, 19'18 in a little town in California called Cement,he moved in 1928 to Fairfield (five miles away), where he still lives.Mr. Wright has worked for the Southern Pacific Railroad as a signalmaintainer for over forty years, has held a First Class F.C.C.Radio-Telephone Commercial License for twenty years, and hastaught electronics in Adu1t Education courses and at Napa Community College. keen interest in this field and in science in generalprompted him to write this book for the younger generation tostudy and realize that maybe Newton and a few more are wrong.

CARLTON PRESS- NEW YORK

-J)>ccCJ:I


2/175

yC WRIGHT JR


3/175

GR VITY IS PUSH


4/175

GRAVITY IS A PUSHby

Walter C. Wright Jr.

A Hearthstone Bookarlton r ss Inc. New or N.Y


5/175

1979 by Walter C Wright JrALL RIGHTS RESERVEDManufactured in the United States of AmericaISBN 0-8062-1263-2


6/175

DEDIC TIONI dedicate my book to three people who h ve been very closeto me: To my son Tom because it w s his doubts bout theNewton Theory th t brought my theory to the surface; to yother son Tim who initially s t down with Tom nd me ndhelped dr ft this theory; nd to my dad who was a typicalfather proud of his son. I regret he did not live long enoughto h ve re d this book.


7/175

ONTENTShl.uoduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 1. How This Theory Was Started. . . . . . . . . . . . 192. Let Us Look Further Out in Space . 93. Let Us Take Wright and Newton Out inSpace . . . . . . . . . . . 434. How I Wrote y Orbital Formula for

Our Planets . . . . 565. How Our Planets and All Heavenly BodiesAre Stablized in Their Orbits . . . . 706. Velocity vs. Repulsion Between HeavenlyBodies . . . . . . . . 79 _7. My Magnetic Circular Squeeze Theory. . . . . 898. The Incoming Gravity Wave Has a TwistFactor in It . . 1059. Is Gravity Here on Earth Getting Weakeror Stronger? . . . . 12210. Let Us Look at Gravity on Some of OurPlanets and the Moon . . . . . .12511. Here Is My Viewpointon the Moon s Orbit . . . . 12712. The Earth Flips Vertically . . . 14013. Heat Does Not Rise. . . 15714. Black Holes . .White Holes Halley sCom.et . . . . 16Conclusion .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . 172


8/175

INTRODU TIONDaniel zeroed in on our generation when he carefully recordswhat was said to him, u[ t] the time of the end know edgeshall be increased (Daniel12:4). Knowledge is currently dou-bling every ten years. In technology, 7 5 percent of all scientistsof history are alive at this moment. Today science is desper-ately trying to catch up with God. Scientists have long puzzledover the majestic statement of the Bible: uln the beginning

[whenever that was] God created the heavens [plural in theHebrew text] and the Earth (Genesis 1:1).The above was from uBible in the News , November, 1977,edition on page 4.

Man by increasing his knowledge in science is in a muchbetter position to understand our universe today than Sir IsaacNewton was back in the 17th century.Here is my contribution in the interest of science that willprove by my formulas, with physical, working models, and by

the actions of heavenly bodies in space that gravity has theevidence of being magnetic with a push, squeeze and twist. Iam well aware of the controversial aspects of the theory andthe many questions that will be thrown at me.f you don't believe Isaac Newton had his problems, too, thenread the following:He became so sensitive to criticism that it required thefrequent importunity of his friends to induce him to pub-lish the most valuable discoveries. His feeling in the mat-ter was thus described in a letter to a friend: see that

man must either resolve t put out nothing new, or tobecome a slave to defend it.That was the opinion of Sir Isaac Newton.I have had that same belief many times but now I welcomeall challengers. Here are the ground rules for the challengers.

9


9/175

Bring your physical exhibits to prove your points about gravityand not just a blackboard, a piece of chalk and formulas. TheProof of the pie is in the eating, and my pie is homemadeOn The Johnny Carson Show May 20, 1977, there was aguest who recently had written a book on the intelligence ofall living animals. He said quite often a young child will ask

~ ~ W h y ? only to be turned off by an adult for one reason oranother. Yet that question could have led t a very importantbreakthrough in ience.I felt the same way about the logic Tom used when at sixyears of age he told me he did not believe Newton's theory ofgravity. As a matter of fact, I fully intended t call this book,Listen t the Young, but Tom insisted that the book shouldbe named in the area of the subject matter, and that is whythe title is Gravity Is a Push.

ttLet us not be too certain of our t ru t -Let us always ques- -tion it, for only in questions is the growth of wisdom. Theabove quote is from a book entitled Moonstar Odyssey by DavidGerrold.

10


10/175

quote from a book called Psycho Cybernetics by MaxwellMaltz, M.D.,F.I.C.S., a famous plastic surgeon:Any breakthrough in science is likely to come from outside the system. uExperts are the most thoroughly familiar with the developed knowledge inside the prescribedboundaries of a given science. Any new knowledge mustusually come from the outside-not by experts but bywhat someone has defined as an 'cinpert. Pasteur was notan M.D. The Wright brothers were not aeronautical engineers but bicycle mechanics. Einstein, properly speaking, was not a physicist but a mathematician. Yet hisfmdings in mathematics completely turned upside downall the pet theories in physics. Madame Curie was not anM.D. but a physicist, yet she made important contributions t medical science.

The above applies to me because I had no real knowledge ofgravity prior t the birth of this theory. This then allowed met stray from the accepted theories and use my knowledge inelectronics plus common uhorse-sense.

Here is a quote from a book entitled arth . .Moon . .andPlanets on page 243: uAll of the hypotheses so far presentedhave failed or remain unproved when physical theory is properly applied.Paraphrasing the above: uin the Wright Theory that gravityis a push between all heavenly bodies, all of the hypotheses sofar presented have been proved when physical theory is properly applied.This has to be the uCinderella Story of space science for alltimes. Here is a book that should never have been written, butwas.First, I am not a scientist. Secondly, I am not a writer, butI do have a space science story to tell. In my humble opinionthis book was written in all fairness to the believers in the

Newton Theory. After investigating the Newton Theory foralmost ten years, I am sorry to say I still haven't found onephysical exhibit that proves his theory to y satisfaction.The following diagrams depict a few exhibits of the pull the-ory between heavenly bodies that were found. Study thesemodels, then render your own verdict.


11/175

1. Here is the Asimov Model. t showsa book on a table. Asimov states thebook is pressing down on the table BOOK)as much as the table is pressing up r.OON)on the book. This model is supposed _.,......_ . . . .to explain why the moon and the TABLE)earth stay in their orbits with a pull EARTH)between them. First, the word pressmeans to push not pull. Second, thebook and the table are physicallytouching each other, but our moonand our earth do not touch one an-other at any time in their orbits. Ifor one don t get it. Do you?

2. In the science classrooms where Ihave lectured and shown my exhibits, there was always a big ballnailed down to a board, which theycall earth, and a rod from earth to asecond smaller ball called the moon.Now, by hand they physically rotatethe ball called earth, and then tellyou that is how the moon orbits theearth with a pull. I m sorry but Idon t get it. Do you?

OON

3. On a The Phil onahue Show aDoctor in Cosmology had a lady walkaround him. Then he told the television audience that he was the earthand she was the moon and that ishow the earth pulls the moon in itsorbit. I don t get i t. Do you? ~ : w ~ ~

E RTH OON

12


12/175

4. A professor from a well-knownuniversity sent me a letter and saidmy theory was full of holes on theaction of comets. e enclosed thisdrawing and told me a comet workst this way: Put a rope through a pipe;tie a weight on one end of the ropeand a loop at the other end; twirl therope around your head while holdingonto the pipe, then pu the rope andthat is how a comet works. I dontget it. o you?

~ G H T ~ P

e sure nd mention theprofessor who said 70urtheory w s tull t holesalso told 70u about ustwo lonely marbles.

5. This one is a classic. Two marbles are set side by side andthe scientists say the two marbles are pulling one another atall times. The only thing wrong with this model is that themarbles never move. One marble is supposed t be the earthand the other marble the moon.I don t get it. Do you?

13


13/175

There were a few more models found but I didn't get themeither. All of them are designed with springs, gears, guides,tracks, etc. Consequently, the assimilated heavenly bodies haveto o where they are pushed or pulled because there isn't anyfreedom of movement.I have a letter from a retired physicist who is eighty two and a half years old. He did not want to get involved in anymore new theories but he did say, uThey are finding out thatmany of ~ accepted theories don't hold water.

Here is a part of a letter I received from a certified engineer:I found myself with a library card (I won't mention theuniversity) and an awareness of the Gravity Problem.I went to the fourth floor entitled the Isaac Newton Col-lection. I soon marched around at least 3,000 volumes,some by familiar authors, and some not. Looking into manyindices and scanning many paragraphs, I suddenly -came aware of a Great Truth: I, too am an expert in thesubject because I know nothing about it other than thingsdrop downward. After an hour, I left refreshed, knowingany effort of mine would not disturb plowed ground. Thegravity hardware I built only succeeded in jumpingoff thetable to the floor.

Apparently he didn't get it either.Did you know that the United States and Russia are nowlooking for evidence to prove if gravity is oming t us as Ein-stein believed? Did you know that the Martin Aircraft Com-pany just recently spent over 2,000,000 dollars taking a newlook at gravity? At one of their annual stockholder's meetingssomeone asked the professor in charge of the gravity programwhere his working models were to prove his points. He em-barrassingly admitted he didn t have any. The program wasthen called off. Did you know the Hughes Aircraft Companyis now conducting a program on gravity?If the above countries and companies (and it is hard telli_nghow many others) believe Newton to the fullest degree, thenwhy are they taking a new look at gravity?

14


14/175

Let us look at some of the natural for es we have here onearth that start by a push 1. Sound waves are a push. 2. Lightwaves are a push. 3. Radio waves are a push. 4. TV waves area push. 5 Oil gushers are a push. 6. Artesian wells are a push.7 Winds are a push. 8. Heat waves are a push. 9. Geysers are

. a push. 10. Fish swim by a push. 11. People walk by a push.12. Birds fly by a push. 13. Continental plates move by a push.14. Tidal waves are a push. 15. Natural gas wells are a push.16. Volcanoes are a push. Try to locate some natural forcesthat start by a pull (Happy hunting.)Einstein believed that gravity waves were coming at us andDr. Weber, after ten years of tuning in on the galaxy, an-nounced in 1969 that he was sure the signals picked up by hisdetectors were gravitational waves. Scientists here in theUnited States and in The Soviet Union are now working toconfirm his findings. If Dr. Weber is right then it could be oneof the greatest discoveries in the history of science and onethat could force physicsts to revise their most basic ideas aboutthe nature of the universe.I want to present a testimonial from Loyal Hanson, who isan electrical engineer.

I have visited at great lengths with W.C. Wright on thesubject of gravity. His thoughts and theories are contraryto the generally accepted theories on the subject. Mr.Wright has developed formulas to substantiate his theo-ries, which appear valid, and measure up to close scrutiny.He has successfully demonstrated that gravity is not apulling force from within the earths core but rather apushing force from outer space. s this theory is ad-vanced, science books of today may have to be rewrittenas they relate to the subject of gravity I have no opinionas to the practical application of this theory but I do findit most interesting.

You can readily see the similarity of this testimonial byLoyal Hanson and the preceding paragraph which stated thati t could force physicists to revise their most basic ideas aboutthe nature of the universeIn 1915 Einstein announced his General Theory of Relativ-ity and four years later it was stated that proof of its validity

15


15/175

had been obtained and that the Newtonian theory of gravityhad been overthrown. Einstein claimed different objects do notattract each other by exerting a pull. Instead of treating gravity as a force, as Newton did, Einstein pointed out that thespace around any celestial body represents a gravitational fieldaround a magnet.Einstein said the following: Heavenly bodies do not exert apull on one another, and gravity is a form of magnetism coming from outer space. Objects are pushed towards the earth bythe gravitational field, rather than pulled by earth.In 1974 I had a student in my electronics class by the nameof George Pope, and he knew a man who was a mechanicalengineer working on a United States Space Project. Georgewas so impressed with my theory that he invited this man tohis home to see my models. After three hours of exchangingviewpoints on my thoory and Newton s, we finally called itquits. George s wife, Pat who had watched my models provethe theory, remarked that she thoroughly enjoyed the eveningand for the first time in her life felt a keen interest in spacescience. I then asked Pat which one of us she believed. Herreply was fast and to the point. She said the models and theorywere very easy to follow but the other man didn t even makesense. At this point he replied that maybe he didn t make sensebut we got to the moon and back didn t we? I said you sure didwith the use of the word:

PUSHI went on to say that the space capsule left earth with a pushit soft-landed on the moon with a push it lifted offofthe moonwith a push and it soft-landed here on earth with a push Italso fired rockets on the way to the moon and back from themoon to correct the error in their flight and that it once againwas done by a series ofpushes The entire flight t the moonand back was accomplished with many pushes, but to myknowledge not one pullThis man had a very fine personality and all he did wasgrin, and then said he was quite impressed with the theory.

6


16/175

Oh yes, he mentioned those same two marbles that are sittingside by side, pulling one another at all times that never move.)To understand the theory of all bodies pushin one anotherat all times I will use the following demonstration. Just visualize that all heavenly bodies, like the Sun, Mercury, Mars,Earth Moon, Pluto etc. are spheres but all of them are hollowinside. Now we will install a wind-making machine inside ofeach one. Our next step will be that we will drill countlessholes through the surfaces of each round body. We will nowturn on all the wind-making machines and blow unlimited airout of the many countless holes and this air is leaving eachsphere under very high pressures. So the end result will bethat when any two bodies come close to each other they willPUSH each other apart at all times as shown in the sketchbelow. This theory does relate to our heavenly bodies becauseno two bodies in space are touching. As a matter of fact, allheavenly bodies continue to get further and further apart withthe passing of time.

n the ten years of my research trying to seek out some ofthe answers of the universe, I have never looked through atelescope. To me the heavens behave like a large group of repelling magnets. o it was very easy to use logic and predicta certain action in space should happen, and after checking Ifound out I was right.17


17/175

Ip

You will find the words I -ume -and umy many timesin this book. It isn t a case ofbeing an egotist but it is t informthe reader just how I felt seeking out this theory. It also meansthat it is my theory and it wasn t copied from anyone else. Ionly have one request to make to the reader and that is pleaseread this book with an open mind.

18


18/175

Chapter 1HOW THIS THEORY WAS STARTED

This story begins back in 1962, when my son Tom, who wasonly six years old, told me one day that he did not believeNewton s theory of gravity. It wasnt until 1968, six yearslater, when I finally asked Tom what is theory was on grav-ity. Much to my surprise, he said he didn t have any, excepthe did not believe Newton. I then asked him why, and this washis reply:1. f he side of our earth that is facing our moon has a hightide, then why does our earth also have a high tide at the sametime on the opposite side?2. f the moon pulls our water, then why doesnt the moonpull this water all the way to the moon?

3. f the moon pulls our water, then why doesn t the moonhave moisture?All of these questions made sense to me, so on September8th, 1968, my two sons, Tim and Tom, and I sat down to probethe heavens with our knowledge of electronics, believing theuniverse was made up of atoms, which is the basis of the electron theory.Tim and Tom had both been my students in electronics forthree years and I had been an electronics instructor for overfifteen years in the California Adult Education Program. I alsohad held the Federal Communications Commission First ClassRadio-Telephone Commercial License with Radar Endorsement for over twenty years.

19

.

I

I


19/175

Times Herald

Here is a picture of Tom in ourlocal newspaper with the following article. cc om Wright,age fourteen, proudly holds hisSecond Class F.C.C. RadioTelephone Commercial License. He might be the youngest person in the United Statesto hold this license.Tom passed the irst ClassF.C.C. Radio-Telephone Commercial License Test at age sixteen.

20


20/175

Vacaville Reporter

ELECTRONICS EXPERTHOLDS EXHI IT

The above model depicts myelectromagnetic action of theuBig Bang theory. You haveheard the old saying, uone picture is worth a 1,000 words. Iwould like to add the following:Watching my freedom-of-movement models in action is wortha million words.

2


21/175

HOOlla i l e s apar t

Tim, Tom and I studied the moon and the earth and decidedthat if the moon were going around the earth at a distance ofapproximately 240,000 miles, and these two bodies are gettingfurther apart every year, then gravity must e a push betweenheavenly bodies. We 'ere strictly novices and we did not knowVenus from Di Milo or Pluto from Plato, but it did seem oddto us that if gravity was a pull, then why weren't heavenlybodies all stuck together like bunch of grapes?First we had to find some type of heat that could providethe power to keep our nine planets and their satellites in theirorbits. This heat we decided was our sun. We then decidedthat the sun rotating once every twenty-five days at the equator and once every thirty-four days at the poles could meanthat the sun was producing magnetism by friction drag. Thisfriction drag could then create magnetic lines of force thatwould reach out beyond our nine planets. These lines of forcefrom the sun would then give each planet and their satellitesa north and south pole, thus making all planets and satellitestemporary magnets.Also, with the sun having two temperatures, 6,000 degreescentrigrade on the outside and 20,000,000 co n the centercould indicate that the sun had two definite metals causingthis heat difference. With the flame from the sun, then thiscould produce bi metal jun tion point energy. This type of en-ergy is electromagnetic and could be the source of energy toproduce the magnetic lines of force from the sun out into outerspace. These magnetic lines of force would in tum producemagnetic poles here on earth and the rest of the planets. Atleast, this was a basis to start from.


22/175

We knew that if this part of our theory was correct and theearth and the other planets were made up of matter, then thesun could not be made up from matter because if it was, thenthe sun would pu all of the planets into it. Here is a sketchof the sun and the Earth and the moon all made up with matter proving this point involving magnetism.

U - LIKEPOLESTTR CT

The following will explain the action of magnetism whenthe material used is matter. f the sun and the earth and themoon were all matter1 Then the sun would produce magnetism by the two methodsI talked about. (Friction drag and bi-metal point energy.)2. The moon and the earth at this point would not have anynorth or south poles (nonmagnetic and without gravity).3. Then the s'un would produce a magnetic field within itself,and this magnetic field would leave the sun at the north pole.4. These magnetic lines of force when they enter the earth andthe moon would make this part of the earth and the moonSouth Poles.5. These magnetic lines of force would leave the earth and themoon at the north poles. The earth and the moon would bemagnetic and they would have gravity.6. These lines of force would re-enter the sun at the south pole.7. Now the sun would pull the earth and moon into it. (unlikepoles attract.)

23


23/175

So the sun ould not be made up of matter.Now let us look at the sun as being anti-matter. Don'tforget the atomic structure of anti-matter is just the oppositeofthe atomic structure ofmatter. With that fact being known,then don't you believe that the magnetic action of magnetismwould be just the opposite when you use anti-matter? Wethought so, and we were looking for a upush between all heavenly bodies.

NORT

REPEL 11

The foll


24/175

6. These magnetic lines of force would re-enter the sun at thenorth pole (anti-matter.7. Now the sun would push the earth and the moon by repellingmagnetic forces and the moon and the earth would push eachother by repelling magnetic forces. (Check sketch on page 24.)So our theory of the sun being anti matter and the earth andthe moon being m tter did, at least, back up our beliefs of thepush between between these three heavenly bodies.

At the end of our three hour session on September 8, 1968we said the following about gravity which is very obvious fromthe sketch on page 24.1. Gravity does not exert a pull between heavenly bodies.2. Gravity exerts a push between heavenly bodies.3. Gravity is a form of magnetism.4. Gravity is coming at earth from outer space; no doubt fromour sun.5. Objects are not pulled to earth by gravity.6. Objects are pushed to earth by gravity, which we called amagnetic circular squeeze factor.We then defined gravity t bea upush, a ((squeeze, and a t w i s t .

Our theory was thought of fifty-three years after Einstein stheory, and without any prior knowledge of his works we saidalmost the identical things about gravity that Einstein did.The only part of the two theories that aren t exactly the sameare:1. We said heavenly bodies push one another and Einstein didnot.2. We said objects here on earth are pushed down to earth bya magnetic circular squeeze and Einstein termed this action aswarping and bending around objects that lay in magnetic grav-itatiorw.l fields.That was the first and last time my two sons and I ever satdown to discuss our gravity theory. Tim at that time was verybusy making movies and won several top awards at the Teenage International Film Festival. He pursued film and dramaand playwrighting in college and at several universities, andin June, 1978 he received his Master of Fine Arts degree. InAugust, 1978, he left for Hollywood to try his skills as a playwright.

25


25/175

Tom is a musician and plays several instruments t perfec-tion but his main instrument is the trumpet. In June 1978Tom received his B.A. in music and will go back this fall forhis Master s.I am very proud that my two sons have accomplished somuch in their separate fields but I really feel that if I couldhave kept them on my team in the search for the secrets ofgravity that we would have come up with a lot more evidence.I am a very logical person and certainly not a skeptic butthe thought that crossed my mind was: do you suppose thisonly meeting we had was predestined?The Daily Republic

Tim started making movies when he was six years old. He has madeover 100 films, from two minute movies to two hour movies This wasa very common scene around the house seeing Tim editing his film.He recently made a special movie for the State of California based oncollege education. Tim also has taught filmaking in two Californiauniversities.26


26/175

The sketch below shows an electromagnet. I put two pieces of verythin steel about four inches long nextto the electromagnet, then ran current through the coil. The electro-magnet pulled the thin pieces of steelinto it. This was no surprise but itwasn t the action I was looking for.

PULLED INIn the sketch below I reversed thecurrent through the coil and theelectromagnet pushe the thin pie-ces of steel away from it. This wasthe answer I was looking for. Nowmy theory of matter being the op-posite of anti-matter could be, atleast, compared to the curtent going

through the coil in one direction andthen reversing the current in the coil,giving two different actions. This isa first in physical science t myknowledge and it wasn t discoveredby mistake because I went lookingfor it.

tPUSHED OUT)

27


27/175

-.. .I

/_ --You will notice in the sketch above the thin pieces of steelre st rting to curve. With a longer piece of thin steel alongwith a more powerful electromagnet, perh ps these thin piecesof steel would have gone into a complete, perfect circle with

my magnetic c i r c u l ~ squeeze factor

8


28/175

Chapter 2LET US LOOK FURTHER OUT IN SPACE

The history of astronomy has had a very slow beginning. twasn't until the 20th century that the focus of astonomy shiftedfrom the planets to the stars. t has only been about the lastfifty years that astronomers have started to comprehend thegalaxies of outer space. Edwin Hubble of the Mt. Wilson Observatory published photographs in 1924 proving that the hazypatches of light which astronomers believed to be inchoatemasses of gas and dust were huge systems of stars like ourown Milky Way Galaxy. Hubble studied these galaxies, measuring their distances, charting their disturbances out in spaceand also analyzing the movements of these galaxies.Hubble observed that the movement of these galaxies werehighly systematic; that is, each galaxy was rushing away fromour Milky Way at a velocity which was directly proportionalto its distance. The greater the distance a particular galaxywas from earth, then the greater the speed of that galaxy.In 1929, Hubble and Humanson published an equation destined to be of great importance in cosmology and it is knownt the astronomers as the Hubble-Humanson Law. t isVm=38r. uVm stands for the velocity of the receding galaxiesin miles per second. ~ ~ r is the present distance from earth inunits of one million light years. A galaxy two hundred millionlight years away from earth is moving at a speed of 38 times200 or 7,600 miles per second.The results of Hubble's studies showed that our universe isexpanding about us in ll directions, and I might add that theuniverse continues to expand faster and faster each and everysecond.

o you think if Newton had been aware of this fact that hewould have continued on with his theory that uall bodies at-tract one another at all times ?

29


29/175

I

I am now going to present physi-cally my version of the Big BangTheory. This might have been themoment when the universe was onebig dark glob and od said, (Letthere be light, and there was light.This sketch shows how I have ar-ranged thirteen repelling magnetsthat repres.ent this big dark globprior to the Big Bang. These thir-teen magnets were held in place me-chanically.

=OUTSI E, R INGINSI E RING

This sketch shows how these thir-teen repelling magnets acted whenthey were all free to move at thesame microsecond.30


30/175

You can readily see that both rings were pushe outwardin perfect circles. _You can also see the H u b b b H u m a n s o n lawof Vm 38rin action. The outside ring traveled outward fourinches further than the center ring which traveled two inches.This means that the outside ring traveled twice as fast andtwice as far as the inside ring of six magnets. This is the sameaction that Hubble found to be happening in space.Two Americans won the Nobel Prize in Physics this year(1978) because they discovered microwave background radi-ation which added support to the Big Bang theory. Study thephysical exhibit of mine, then ask youiSelf if I have addedany more support t this theory.

De Sitter Universe has no matterin it, so it is hard to illustrate. Butif one imagines a few particles (onthe center triangle) to act as umark-ers, these separate from each otherat speeds proportional to their dis-tances apart.

Center Triangle)

(DE SITrER MODEL)

This sketch t the left shows how mymodel duplicates the ne Sitter The-ory. There are three repelling mag-nets in a center triangle formationthat have been placed mechanicallyas the sketch shows.

3


31/175

Outside Triangle)

fN smirror

orseshoe Magnet

This sketch to the left shows thatwhen I released all three repellingmagnets at the same time they werepushed to the position of the outsidetri ngle in the De Sitter Theory.De Sitter worked with Einstein andit appears that he must have lookedat gravity in our universe s a pusbetween all heavenly bodies. The DeSitter model was the exact actionthat Hubble witnessed for the firsttime in astronomy when he saw gal-axies rushing away from each otherat speeds proportional to their dis-tances apart, which he termed ('TheExpanding Universe in 1924.

I felt the Moon, Earth, Mars and theSun had to be squeezed round bymagnetic forces. So I put a mirror ontop of a powerful horseshoe magnetand poured iron filings on top of themirror. You can see the iron filingswere squeezed into a perfect halfsphere, one more of my firsts inphysical science to my k n o ~ l e d g e

3


32/175

>tirror

f you catch the angle right thenthe reflection in the mirror gives theappearance of a perfect sphere of ironfilings. I say that was how all heav-enly bodies were formed because atone time all bodies were gaseous andsome still are. The sun is not solidlike the moon. In my presentationthus far I have tried to demonstratemy theory with the following:1. The universe started as the uBigBang theory states.2. As these heavenly bodies wereblown apart they all developed amagnetic field within them-selves.3. These magnetic fields were so de-veloped that each field in eachheavenly body squeezed itselfround by a magnetic circularsqueeze.4. These magnetic fields within eachbody then repelled all other heav-

enly bodies and that is why theuniverse is still expanding.5. So all heavenly bodies are float-ing in space. Following is a sketchshowing how I built the floatingmagnet exhibit.33


33/175

N

s

Permanent magnets uA, uc, uD,uE,U uF, and G, are all fixed mag-nets but can be moved. Permanentmagnet B is in the center and floatsn space.

sA

N

N ;s \ F

S t II I

B

t I CN I

G

N

s

This exhibit shows why the planets and our sun float in space andwhy the universe is expanding in all directions by my theory of re-pelling magnetic heavenly bodies.In the sketch above uB is a round floating magnet. MagnetsuA, uc, uD, uE, ~ F , and UG (UG is in back ofHB and can'tbe seen) are all permanent magnets with their g n e t i ~ polesrepelling the permanent magnet uB. This permanent magnet~ c B is floating in space. If any of the magnets are moved in or

34


34/175

out, up or down, then the floating magnet uB'' will float to anew position proving for every action there is a ~ c t i o n ..If you would check the orbit of our moon, our earth and theother eight planets you will find out that all of these bodiesmove in and out during their orbits. The moon will move incloser to the earth once on each orbit and that is calledperigee,and the moon will also move out once during each orbit andthat is called apogee. Our planets act the same way aroundour sun in their orbits.

. ~ . . _.c _........... .- r4 : ~ / , z . . J ... l_ r , - f l l , \ . , ~. . . ,. . ... J. f .C tc, v . J I I . . ' I t , . ~ . \ , . ' ' ~ r . \ . ... \ ,..,. ; ; : ; , .... . , , ~ , . ,. t ' o ' \. . . . ... : . .,. .. ,.. ,I f you looked out in space with a verypowerful telescope you would see somany heavenly bodies that theywould almost appear to be a blur, asmy sketch to the left shows

(My model has 104 magnets)Here is a sketch of a model I builtwith repelling magnets that keepsall magnets from touching one an-other. In my model all magnets havetheir north poles up and they repeleach other at all times. These repel-ling magnets are all free to move,~ d i f the framework that encasesthem were taken apart then all ofthe magnets would be pushed fur-ther from each other. This is the sameaction that Hubble saw for the firsttime in 1924, which he referred to asOur Expanding Universe.

35


35/175

Our atmosphere is an invisible and most likely inexh ustiblecombination of air water vapor and dust particles as well asradioactive fallout from nuclear explosions and the pollutantsof a technological society. t sea level a cubic foot of mixtureweighs about one ounce and a quarter. The entire atmosphereweighs 5 700000 000 000 000 tons barely a millionth as muchas the earth and the force wit which gravity holds it in placecauses it to exert a pressure of fifteen pounds to the inch atsea level. .The human body copes with this by exerting an equal out-ward pressure to balance that of the atmosphere just as fishdo in order to live under far greater pressures deep in theocean.

Compare the following:ATMOSPHERE:1. Invisible2. Inexhaustible3. By exerting an equal outward pressure to balancethat of the atmosphere.Scientists explain this action because it is physical. Thisexplanation almost goes hand in hand with the way I explainthe behavior between two stabilized heavenly bodies. You cansee the gravity action on page 35 where many many bodieshave been stabilized by equal and outward pressures.

MY THEORY OF GRAVITY:1. Invisible2. Inexhaustible3. By exerting an equal out-ward pressure to balancethat of gravity.

36


36/175

.( \' ,; '...'

EARTHLVN R E- - l g A T o ~ t

- PUSH APART .

Astronomers are trying to understand just what is way outin space and yet, the answer might be within 240,000 milesfrom them. This drawing shows like poles on the moon andthe earth urepelling and that is a ccpush.In the theory that gravity is magnetic, you can readily un-derstand in the sketch above why the moon and the earthwould not hit if they passed each other in space, due to theirrepelling magnetic forces. This could be the evidence needed

to explain why it is possible for billions of stars in one galaxyto pass through billions of stars in another galaxy withouteven one collisioni How could this happen with Newton's In-verse Square Law of a pull between all heavenly bodies? nAugust, 1976, there were only two motorcycles on the entirePitcairn Islands, but they hit at an intersection. How did thelaw of averages allow these two motorcycles to hit and yetthere was not one collision between billions ofstars when theypassed each other out in space with a pu between them. Idon't get it, do you?

37


37/175

JIIIR ftJU lJN1VI:III - ftt .... .. ............................. . ...

(Vacaville Reporter)My exhibit of two galaxies p ssing each other inspace without one collision.

38


38/175

In f904 Lowell predicted the existence of Pluto, which hecalled Planet X due to Neptune's erratic orbit. Pluto was dis-covered in 1930 by Tombaugh. Pluto was 3,670,000,000 milesfrom the sun but since its discovery in 1930 it has moved inover 1,000,000,000 miles closer to the sun. t is now inside ofNeptune's orbit which the drawing shows. I built this physicalmodel ofPlutos orbit which works by its own freedom ofmove-ment.

My Mode l )

This s.Pluto ' sorbi t .

Newton's laws state that the sun is the only body that pu sour planets inward. He also said more mass me ns more t-tr ction and the closer a planet is to the sun, then the moreattraction by our sun. Here is poor little Pluto the secondsmallest planet and the furthest planet from the sun that hasbeen upulled in over one billion miles but no other planet hasmoved any closer to our sun since 1930. I claim, that due toPluto's very erratic orbit there is a body out in space I havenamed TIOM, after my two sons, that is pushing Pluto in to-wards the sun. In this case TIOM reacts like a tiger to Plutobut like a pussycat to the other planets.Lowell predicted that when his Planet X was discovered itwould be very massive due to its ability to make Neptune'sorbit erratic. Much to the surprise of the scientific world Nep-tune is over 500 times bigger than Pluto. Tiom could be gi-gantic or even much smaller than Pluto based on my theoryof uthe tiger and uthe pussy cat reaction.

39


39/175

1. 2. 4.

In 1969 I took two balloons and rubbed them against myshirt and by placing them in the following positions, they al-ways pushed apart. )1. Bottom to bottom:2. Top to top.3. Bottom to top.4. Side by side.As a matter of fact, it didn't make any difference what -sition these balloons were in; they always pushed apart. Weknow that the above action was due to static electricity. I wassurprised to observe that the balloons always pushed apart. Ithought that at some position, they would pull together. So isgravity really static electricity?1. All heavenly bodies are in motion.2. Motion will cause friction.3. Friction will produce an electric static charge.4. Does this electric static charge have the ability to push allheavenly bodies from each other?5. Static electricity could produce a magnetic factor.I challenge the Einstein theory that the speed of light, whichtravels approximately 186,000 miles per second, is the fastestspeed possible here in our universe. I feel that it is quite pos-sible for heavenly bodies to exceed this speed of 186,000 milesper second many, many times. Let us look a little closer at TheHubble-Humanson Law which is stated as follows: Vm 38ruvm stands for the velocity of the receding galaxies in milesper second and ur is the present distance from earth in units

40


40/175

ofone million light-years. Hence a galaxy one hundred millionlight-years away is moving at a speed of 38 x 100 or 3,800miles per second. Galaxies one billion light-years away arefleeing outward at 38,000 miles per second, about one fifth thespeed of light. The HubbleHumanson law tells us that galaxies are traveling faster and faster each and every second, so.I will now tell you how far these galaxies will be from earthwhen they will travel at the speed of light. When a galaxy gets4,895 million light.years away from our earth, then that galxy will be fleeing outward at 186,000 miles per second or atthe speed of light. When this galaxy is 97,897 million lightyears from earth then that galaxy will be traveling 3,720,000miles per second or twenty times the speed of light. This hasto happen or the famous cosmology law of HubbleHumanson

isn t worth the paper i t is written on.I feel that there are many galaxies today that are goingfaster than Mach-20 or 3,720,000 miles per second, which istwenty times faster than the speed of light.As we approach the end of the twentieth century we arelooking at a subject called space travel and I would like tovoice my views on the possibility of such a mode of this typeof transportation. At the present time our space vehicles havetop speeds of about 20,000 miles per hour, which in reality isa fabulous rate of speed when you look back 500 years ago andthink about how long it took Columbus to find the New World.Let us look out into space and see how long it would take toreach our neighbors at 20,000 miles per hour. These figuresare b sed on the closest point between earth and its neighborsor ''as the crow flies.Body Distance from earth Time neededMOON . . . . . .. .. . . . . . 240,000 miles . . . . 12 hrs.VENUS 26,000,000 miles . . . 54 daysM Rs .... . . . . . . . .48,000,000 miles . 100 daysMERCURY . 57,000,000 miles . . . 119 daysJUFITER 390,000,000 miles . . .. 2.2 yearsSATURN 793,000,000 miles . . . . . 4.5 yearsURANUS 1,690,000,000 miles . . 9.6 years

41


41/175

; ;ilt. ..

,,'I,,

I iI

NEPTUNE . . . . .2,701,000,000 miles . . . . . 15.4 yearsPLUTO . . 3,577,000,000 miles . . . . . .. 20.4 yearsDon't forget you have to come back home, too.Now let us go beyond our neighbors and go to the closestbody to us in the Milky Way Galaxy and that body is a stara burning sun. It is 4.5 light-years away. This is a distance of26,395,632,000,000 miles from earth. At 20,000 miles per hourit would take 150,660 years to get there. So if we can surpassthe speed of light we can think about ~ u t there but if wecan't then we had best turn our attention to nhere.

42


42/175

Chapter 3LET US TAKE WRIGHT AND w r O N OUTIN SPACE

The following comparisons will be used to look at Newton'supull theory versus Wright's upush theory. The laws are theones found in books that were Newton's. I will use the samelaws, except I will use the words, urepel -upush instead ofuattract or upull.OW NEWTON LOOKEDAT GRAVITY. (PULL)Here is the first law of New-

ton's theory of gravity: 1. uAnybody, once set in motion, willcontinue to move forward in astraight line with uniform ve-locity forever, provided it isacted upon by no force what-ever.(This law could also apply to aPULL.)

Here is Newton's second lawof motion:2. ~ W h e n any force acts on amoving body, its deviation froma straight line will be in thedirection of the force appliedand proportional to that force.(This law could also apply to aPULL.

4

HOW WRIGHT LOOKS ATGRAVITY. (PUSH)I will accept this first law ofNewton's theory of gravity.1. uAny body, once set in mo-tion, will continue to move for-ward in a straight line withuniform velocity forever, pro-vided it is acted upon by no

force whatever.(This law could also apply to aPUSH.)I will also accept this secondlaw of motion by Newton.2. uWhen any force acts on amoving body, its deviation froma straight line will be in thedirection of the force applied

and proportional to that force.(This law could also apply to aPUSH.)


43/175

Here is Newtons third law ofmotion:3. Action and reaction are equaland opposite. This law couldapply to a PULL between od-Ies.

I accept this third law of mo-tion by Newton.3. Action and reaction are equaland opposite.This law could also apply to aPUSH between bodies.

In regard to his third law of motion I found the following ina book from a series called Great Ideas of Science by Asimov,entitled From Apple to Moon:

Newton went on to propose a third law of motion, whichmay e stated: if a body exerts a force on a second body,then that second body exerts an equal force, in the opposite direction, on the first body; In other words, if a bookpresses down on a table, the table must e pressing up onthe book by the equal amount.

According to Webster s Dictionary the word press means topush not pull. t seems t be a very odd way to explain equaland opposite actions, when they speak of a pull of gravity -tween two bodies, especially when the book and the table arephysically touching one another and heavenly bodies aren t.Another quote from the same book: uTo make an object movefaster, slow down, or turn aside on its path, you must push orpull it. A push or a pull is called a force.

44


44/175

\

Below is my physical exhibit of Newton s third law of mo-tion. I placed these two repelling magnets side by side, hangingfrom strings and let them go. They went into motion and theyhave stopped in this position by the law ofuaction and reactionare equal and opposite. et Newton s followers do this witha pull between bodies.


45/175

NEWTONNewton claimed that gravityand magnetism are not thesame, and yet the law he usedstates, ((Every particle of mat-ter in the universe attractsevery other particle with a forceproportional to the product oftheir masses and inversely pro-portional to the square of thedistance between them. Thisis a law that is used in basicmagnetism.

Below is a picture of a mantrying to keep twopullin mag-nets from touching one an-other. He could not do it. Thisexhibit applies to Newton's lawabove based on thepull ofgrav-ity between bodies, which alsoapplies to the pull betweenmagnets. This would makebodies touch.

WRIGHTI claim that gravity and mag-netism are one and the same. I

want to point out that everyparticle of matter in the uni-verse repels every other parti-cle with a force proportional tothe product of their masses andinversely proportional to thesquare of the distance betweenthem is a law of basic magnet-ij lmBelow is a picture of a mantrying to make these same twostrong magnets touch one an:.other and he can t because theyare now repelling This exhibitapplies to my law above basedon the push of gravity betweenbodies, which also applies to thepush between magnets. This iswhy heavenly bodies don ttouch one another.

6


46/175

Newton and Motion compared to Wright and Motion:NEWTON S LAW

The earth pulls the moon;therefore the moon must exertan equal force on the earthEach and every body in theuniverse is linked by mutualattraction If a small mass, likethe moon, is to attract the earthwith the same force s the earthattracts the moon, i t is appar-ent that the masses ofboth bod-ies must cooperate to determinethe resultant attraction To al-low for this effect, Newton res-tated his law of gravitation inits final and complete fonn:, every particle of matter in the universe attracts every otherparticle with a force propor-tional to the product of theirmasses and inversely propor-tion l t the square of the dis-tance between them

WRIGHT S LAWThe earth push s the moon;therefore the moon must exertan equal force on the earth.Each and every body in theuniverse is linked by mutualrepulsion If a small mass likethe moon, is to repel the earthwith the same force as the earthrepels the moon, it is apparentthat the masses of both bodiesmust cooperate to determinethe resultant repulsion To al-low for this effect, Wright res-tated his law of gravitation inits final and complete form:every particle of matter in theuniverse repels every otherparticle with a force propor-tional t the product of theirmasses and inversely propor-tional to the square of the dis-tance between them

Let us look at Wrights Theory on page 48The earth pushes the moon; therefore the moon must exertan equal force on the earth Each and every heavenly bodyin the universe is linked by mutual repulsion. f a smallmass like the moon, is to repel the earth with the sameforce as the earth repels the moon, it is apparent that bothbodies must cooperate to determine the resultant repul-sion.

47


47/175

The sketch below shows how I made this physical exhibit topoint out that it applies to all heavenly bodies. I used threerepelling magnets. You can visualize these three magnets asthe sun the earth and the moon. First I tied them side by side,hanging from strings and then I let them go. You can see thatthe place of rest for each body is as my law states: ult is ap-parent that the masses of all of the bodies must determine theresultant repulsion.

SUN I1 Nns

E RTH

You can see that my theory explains why our sun, our earthand the moon arent touching one another. Let the followersof Newton perform this space action.

8


48/175


49/175

'

PULL

ANOTHER WORKING MODELuuNLIK POLES ATTRACT"Here is another one of my exhibitsshowing two permanent magnetsresting on wooden pegs and one per-manent magnet hanging down fromabove. The two outside magnets havetheir north poles up and south polesdown. The center magnet has itssouth pole up and north pole down.The center magnet is always pulledto the right or to the left due to thebasic law that unlike poles attract.I built this model nine years ago andI have challenged many people tostabilize the magnet in the centerwith the pu th ory of gravity. Noone to date has accomplished this andI say they never will. If heavenlybodies pu one another they wouldpu into one another as this modelshows.

50


50/175

This sketch is a good comparison of the planets in volume butnot distance.

00 I iPLANET DISTANCE FROM SUN MASS OF PLANETSMERCURY 36,000,000 miles. . . .06 (BABY PLANET)VENUS . 67,000,000 miles . . .82EARTH . . . . . . 93,000,000 miles . . 1.00MARS . . 141,000,000 miles . . . .11JUPITER . 483,000,000 miles 318.40 (GIANT PLANET)SATURN 886,000,000 miles 95.00URANUS . . 1,783,000,000 miles . . 7.00NEPI UNE . 2,794,000,000 miles . . 17.00PLUTO 3,670,000,000 miles . . .18 (BABY PLANET)

_You just read on page 46 that Newton stated that gravity willh v e more attraction between bodies when there is more m ss ndthe closer the bodies are to one another the more attractionthere is between them. t also has been stated by scientists~ the only heavenly body that pulls the planets of our solar ysteln inward is the sun.;. Ookat the above sketch and ask yourself how it is possiblet apply these laws of Newton to our planet alignment, when(the two baby planets are on each end of the planet spectrumand Jupiter is the giant and is in the center. I, for one, dontget it. o you?Let us take a trip through space and look at the mass of ourplanets.


51/175

Mercury, our first planet from the sun has a mass of .06.Venus, has a mass of .82. (13.6 times greater than Mercury.)An increase.Earth has a mass of 1. (1.2 times greater than Venus.) In-crease.Mars has a mass of .11. (.11 the size of earth.) Decrease.Jupiter has a mass of 318. (2,890 times greater than Mars.)Increase.Saturn has a mass of 95. (.3 the size of Jupiter.) Decrease.Uranus has a mass of 7. (.07 the size of Saturn.) Decrease.Neptune has a mass of 17. (2.4 times greater than Uranus.)Increase.Pluto has a mass of .18. (.01 the size of Neptune.) Decrease.

You can readily see the m ss f ctor increases and decreaseswithout any continuity from Mercury to Pluto. Now maybeyou might understand why I don t look at the m ss f ctor ofthe planets as Newton did.What has also puzzled me is why Newton used the volumeto-mass factor on some planets as being identical and otherplanets completely different. I will now list the volume of theplanets to their mass factors.

PLANET VOLUME FACTOR MASS FACTORMERCURY .06 .06 (SAME)VENUS .92 .82 (LESS)EARTH 1 00 1.00 (SAME)MARS .15 .11 (LESS)JUPITER 1,312.00 318.40 (LESS)SATURN I 763 00 I t 95 (LESS)URANUS 64.00 7.00 (LESS)NEPI UNE 43.00 . . . .. .. 17.30 (LESS)PLUTO . .. . . . . I could not locate

52


52/175

MER URY~ JUPITER PLUTOJupiter is 5,300 times bigger in mass than Mercury and 1,766.times bigger than Pluto. The sketch above is a comparison,between Mercury, our first planet from the sun, Jupiter our.middle planet, and Pluto our furthest known planet from the~ Look at the above sketch and ask yourself if Newton'sLaws on mass makes sense t you. Personally, I don't get it.I really believe Newton changed the mass to volum ratio tomake his mathematics come out correct.According to Newton's theory, a force of gravitation is setup by every object in the universe and i t is the gravitation of

.the sun that keeps the earth moving around it. Newton had :.:_ lhown that this simple motion is the result of just the solar. attraction: I am now going t check Newton's law of gravitational at-

' :1

.h.ction by our sun on every planet, so it will be possible t :f :compare the pulling force by the sun on each one of our nine:: ( . .anets.- Newton's law states that every particle of matter in the

:. /universe attracts every other particle with a force proportional-:: -b the product of their mass and inversely proportional to thelqUare of the distance between them. The last part which states,1 ; _ inversely proportional to the square of the distance between. .} them, will be changed to ccdirectly proportional to the square

1:df.-the distance between them. The reason I am doing this ist make the answer a whole number and n o ~ some hard-to-

53


53/175

I

I

understand fractional number. The only difference will be thatI will work from Pluto towards Mercury instead of from Mercury towards Pluto.

In Newton s law it is stated when you double the distance,the force between objects will be as great. Another wellknown law in magnetism is that when you divide the distancein half, then the force is increased four times. t is the samelaw as Newton s, as far as finding the right answer.Pluto is 3,670,000,000 miles from the sun. Pluto s mass is.18. I will call 3,670,000,000 miles a factor of one for distance.I will call .18 a factor ofone for mass. Force equals mass timesdistance squared. 1 equals 1 x 1 o the sun has an attractiveforce on Pluto of 1.Neptune is 2,794,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of17. Now divide 3,610,000,000 by 2,794,000,000 and the answeris 1.3. 17 divided by .18 equals 94 for Neptune s mass. (Don tforget that Pluto s mass of .18 is the basis of 1 for all themasses of each planet and 3,670,000,000 is a factor of 1 fordistance.) Force = 94 x 1.32Force = 94 x 1.69Attractive force on Neptune by the sun is 158.If you care to, you can work on the following problems forthe remaining planets because only the answers will be shown.Uranus is 1,783,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of7Attractive force on Uranus by the sun is 152.Saturn is 886,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of95Attractive force on Saturn by the sun is 8,854.Jupiter is 483,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of318.Attractive force on Jupiter by the sun is 102,428.Mars is 141,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of .11.Attractive force on Mars by the sun is 406.Earth is 93,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of 1Attractive force on Earth by the sun is 8,960. .Venus is 67,000,000 miles from the sun with a mass of .82.Attractive force on Venus by the sun is 13,915.

54


54/175

.

Tide is also i g ~ onbackside of earth at thesame time.(This model backs up my theory that gravity could be magnetic.)

I have checked many science books and it doesn't seem tomake any difference i the book is in a high-priced bracket orone that only costs 79 plus tax, they all agree that the moonpulls our waters here on earth, causing high tides. Very fewof these books ever go into detail just how the moon pulls ourwaters. I did find a book that explains this action which willnow be shown and quoted.Thediagram explains the forces that cause the tides. Wateron the moon-side of the earth is shown at A, solid earthis shown at B, the center of earth at C, the more distantside of earth at D, and the ocean again at E. The moonattracts the ocean at A more strongly than it does thesolid earth directly below it at B. Therefore, the water ispiled up. The ocean at E, because it is so much fartheraway, is not pulled toward the moon as much as the solid

166


166/175

HighTide~

earth; earth is pulled away from the water; and the wateris therefore deeper during this part of the tidal cycle.

High~ i d e240,000 miles

I will now look at their explanation with common horse sense.The moon s 240,000 miles from the oceans water at A and248,000 miles from the ocean's water at point E, which is onlya difference of 8,000 miles or a little over 3 . That small dif-ference of 3 shows the i m ~ i i l i t y of the w ~ r at pointE being so much farther away than the solid earth, as wasmentioned n their explanation. Look at the diagram, then askyourselfthat if it was possible for the moon to pull the ocean'swater at A more strongly than the solid earth at B, then howcould it e possible for the moon to pull the solid earth at Dmore strongly than the ocean's water at E?

If the ocean's water was pulled by the moon at A, then theocean's water atE had to e pulled by the moon, too, and thiswould cause the water a t to lower If the solid earth at Dwas pulled by the moon, then the ocean's water a t wouldfollow the solid earth at D and once again would be lower andot higher I for one can t go along with this explanation ofourtides, but now I can readily understand why the tides are veryseldom explained in science books. As a matter of fact, most

books state that the solid earth does move, but the movementis so slight that it has to e detected with very precise instru-ments. Yet they explained that the earth moved more than thewater did at E. I don't get it, do you?In my next book I will show how I built this physical exhibit167


167/175

that duplicates the tides. The following are the two high tideson January 12 , 1978 for San Francisco, Calif.At 2.24 AM the ide was 5 foot 6 inches high.At 1.42 PM the tide was 5 foot 6 inches high. (Almost 12hours later.

SAN FRANCISCO;5 oot 6 inch 1high tide.142 PM .Jan. 12, 1978

(MY MANM DEEARTH)s

SAN FRANCISCO5 foot 6 inchhigh tide. 2.24 AM,Jan. 12, 1978

)

I had San Francisco face my man-made moon and raised thetide of my man-made earth that was made out ofan eight-inchwater filled balloon. I then turned the man-made world 180degrees and still raised the tide at San Francisco on my manmade earth. I was able to do this with a upush between thisman-made moon and man-made earth by applying the theorythat gravity is magnetic. This exhibit was first built in 1970and I had it copyrighted in my booklet 10 entitled uTides area push. I challenge the science world to build such an exhibitusing their theories that are found in science books today.Also, I will show how I built Halley's Comet's orbit with apush. Don't forget the professor who thought my theory wasfull of holes and said a comet works the following way: ~ i e aweight to a string about five feet long and run the free endthrough the hole in a short piece of pipe. Make a loop in thisend and put your right hand through it. Hold the pipe in yourleft hand and twirl the weight around in a horizontal circle.This is a model of the earth-moon system. The weight is themoon; the pipe and your hands represent the earth. Notice thatyou are pulling on the weight (the moon). You are setting upan orbit with a pull on the moving moon. No push is required.Now pull down sharply with your right hand only on the loop.The spee of the weight (moon) increases and the force youmust apply to i t does also. This is the answer to the questionyou raised on Halley's Comet.

168


168/175

The question I would like to have asked the professor is howdid this umerry-go-round of string pipe, right hand loop, lefthand weight and twirl all start? In my judgement this merrygo-round had to start from a push I wouldn't care to build thisexhibit because it appears to be rather dangerous.

??

WeightPipe

This is the replicaof the professor'ssketch.

rm sorry but my companywon't let me insure youif you are going to putthat model in motion.

169


169/175

People seem to be more concerned w i ~ h ~ a r t h q u a k e s t ~ a nthey were in the past. In my next book I will Include an exhibitof an earthquake caused by a push. This exhibit is so set upthat it allows a person to pick any spot in the world and anearthquake will happen there. It s a very interesting model.

I recall the time I was a guest of the Lions' Club in myhometown of Fairfield, California. I had just concluded manydemonstrations and I noticed a man in the corner, sort of pon-dering to himself. I went over to him to find out if he had aquestion or two to ask. He said he was so confused he didn'teven know where nup was let alone ask any questions.Here is the formula you will find in all electronic books forthe frequency of a resonant tuned circuit.R = 7T x vtc

2 T is not whol.e number so this formula, although it has beenaccepted In the Industry for years and years, is not an accurateformula. As an electronics instructor my main concern was toget ~ h e subject m ~ t t e r over to the student in the easiest waypossible, so here s the formula I wrote many years ago. It is170


170/175

accurate to the last hertz and it is easier and faster to work.This formula someday may e in electronic books that teachthe basicsIT C 25281V.l. r-L x C

Fr is in Kilohertz. L is in microhenries. Cis in microfarads.25281 is a basic number.

In August of 1976 the following models were on display atthe Town and Country Fair in Napa, California for five days.Don t you believe if your science class had these models youcould have discussed the universe in a more practical, interesting and educational way?1. The Big Bang Theory.2. Gravity Is a Magnetic Circular Squeeze.3. Floating a Magnetic Body In Space.4 . Why Trillions Of Stars Never Touch.5. Why Swirling-Twirling Galaxies Pass Through Each OtherWithout One Collision.6 . Why the Moon and Earth Never Touch.7. Tides Are a Push. (Not covered in this book.)8. Why the Backside of the Moon Is Not Seen From Earth.9 . The Slinky Toy Exhibit on Gravity Coming at Earth.10. Continents Are Twisting Clock- and Counterclockwise.11. Why the Moon s Orbit is Elliptical.12. Metal is Pushed From a Magnet.13. Proving the De Sitter Theory.14. My Earthquake Exhibit. (Not covered in this book.)15. The Hubble-Humanson Law of VM = asr

16. Newton s Inverse Square Law.I for one would have enjoyed my science class a great dealmore i my teacher had presented the above models when Iattended school, instead of him manipulating the models of

171


171/175

the earth, moon, sun, etc. by hand. I wonder i they are stillusing these same hand-manipulated exhibits that we had inGeneral Science back in 1932. I believe I will go back someday and see.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Looking back over these past ten years, I realize how grateful I am to the .following people who sent clippings from newspapers and magazines, voiced many good points that definitelyreinforced my theory, subscribed to my monthly flyers, boughtmy booklets, read some of my material, printed my material,sent flyers to interested people, did the art work, wrote articlesin magazines and newspapers, talked about the theory on radio, had me appear on television, presented my exhibits atscience fairs, encouraged me to continue on against insurmountable odds, and so the list grows. I haven't forgotten theirmuch needed support and I am indebted to them.No one knows any better than I that uno man is an island.

Erna Adiego, Tracy Adiego, Wayne Adiego, Jim Ade, E.F. Allen,Diane Alonzo, Manuel Alonzo, Juanita Antes, Buck Bailey, Dick Ballison, Joe Balwinski, Cliff Barnett, Professor Barney, Bob Barnum,Emma Beach, Bill Bennett, Dennis Bensen, Phyllis Bigelow, JimBlackwell, Jerry Blair, Dan Blanton, Terry Boothby, Fred Boots,Claudia Bower, Eugene E. Bower, Eugene L. Bower, Connie Bozenich,Margaret Bozenich, Mary Bozenich, Paul Bozenich, Philip Bozenich,M B. Brooks, Floyd Brown, Ginny Brown, Dick Brownell, Bev Bunting, Enola Burdick, Glen Burdick, Marilyn Burdick, Pam Burdick,Susan Burdick, Tom Burdick, Howard Busby, Shirley Busby, C. Bush,Mrs. Butler, Newton Butler, Norman Butler, Dan Byrd, Janey Callahan, Drusella Campos, Manuel Campos, Bill Carey, John Carey,David Carr, Irene Carr, bert Carr, Steve Carr, Roy Carter, ChickChaney, Salley Chaney, D.J. Chomina, Joe Clark, Jack Clayton, C.W.Close, Dottie Close, Petrea Combs, Judy Cooper, Tex Cooper, Dr. Collins, Mike Criner, Vivian Cross, Innal Dauer, Pete Dauer, Dave Davis,H.C. Davis, Larry Davis, Florence Day, Richard Day, Julia Diaz, AIDickey, Gene Dillman, Diane Devine, Don Devine, Burke Donavan,Winnie Donavan, Bob Douglas, bert Duffy, Don Dunn, Joe Duren,Lauri Duren, Paul Duren, Viola Eizenoff, Carol Embry, bert Embry, Maurice Epps, Jerry Fairchild, Mary Helen Fairchild, Alma Far-

172


172/175

aoni, J a ~ k Faraoni, Elizabeth Fields, Bernard Finley, Jim Finley,Maude Fmley, John Folsom, Sam Fortner, Floyd Francis, Doug Free-man Francis Fry Barba.ra Fuston, David Fuston, Dennis Fuston,Donna Fuston, Ed Fuston, Florence Fuston, Richard Fuston, RonaldFuston, Mike Gage, Reggie Gallman, Dr. Emil Gaveluk, Fred George,Dr. Florence Gerish, D. Gieskieng, Tom Gilmore, Vera Gilmore, BessGlancy, Ed Golden, Larry Golden, Mike Gonzales, Jim Gowder, ReneGreen, Les Gregerson, B9b Grow, J.C. Guerrero, Amado Guzman,Melinda Guzman, Gladys flaakavald, Eva Haddad, Lee Hamilton,Phyll is Hamilton, Chet a n c o c ~ Tom Hannigan, John Hansen, LoyalHanson, Bill Hardwick, Professor Hart, Rose Hatch, David Hatfield,Don Heimberger, Dorthy Hendricks, Sharol Hewett, Marie Hilden,Walter Hilden, Eleanor Hinltson, Joe Hinkson, Dennis Hoagland, BevHolden, Del H9lly, ~ e Holly, Max Howard, Floyd Howell, SteveHuddleston, Mary H u f f e n b ~ r g e r Robert Hughes, Dick Houghton,Shirley Houghton, Diane Householder, Lola Jarvis, R.H. Jiminez,Ernie Johnson, Oon Jones, Lynn Marie Jordon, Frank Jurik FrankJurick Jr., Tom Kampmt nn, Fred Kendell, A.J. Keyes, Al Kilkenny,ennis Kilkenny, ~ a t h y Kilkenny, } \ i ~ K i l ~ e n n y Linda Kilkenny,Pat Kilkenny, Ruth Kilkenny, Charles Kittredge, Irene Koester,Louise Koester, Harold Kuehl, Jane Kyle, Aubry Kyle, Emogene Kyle,John Lambert, Virginia Lamore, Jane La Pollito, Mike Lappolis, GlenLarsen, lgne Laskowski, Claude Latereur, Denise Latereur LionelLee, Joe Le Gare, Dorothy Lemoin, Tim Lemoin, John H. Lewis, MinLin, Marvel Little, Lavern Lopez, Mary Lormer, Glen Ludden, RickLunsman, Tom Lybeck, Mike Lyon, Tammi Lyon, Ed Mackey, DianeMagleby, Roger Magleby, Pevin Maher, Tim Maher, Jerry Main, Ev-elyn Mancarrow, Bill Mann Bob Mann, Don Marcus, Ann Martin,Don Martin, Roy Martin, Evelyn Matherby, Gloria Matthes, DavidMaupin, Eric Maupin, Patricia Maupin, Maryalice Maxwell, Tim MeKenna Bob Me Knight, Ed Me Millian, T.A. Mercado, Emma Miller,Jim Miller, Bruce l\{oore, Darrell Moore, Kenny Moore, Don Morgan,M.H. Morris, John Murphy, Milli Murri, Lois Myatt, Ron Myers, GeneNeff, Kelly Newman, Joe Nunes, Don Oliver, Jessie Ortez, R.G. Ott-man Dolly O w e ~ Morris G. Parrish Myrlee Potosnak, John Payne,Lew Pearce, Joe Perez, Doris Perrin, Rick Perrin, Rosetta Person,Dottie Peterson, Marion Peterson, Lou Pettit, Virginia Pettit VivianPlank, Louis Poli, Ed Polick, Bill Pope, George Pope, Pat Pope, BobPower, V. Laudel Pratt Greg Procer, Agnes Pronzini, J .M. Radman,Ray Raines, David Rapley, Wayne Ratliff, J .W. Real, Gertrude Reftk.eIva Regal, Ray Regal, C.A. Regalia, Malcolm Reynolds, W. Reynolds,Jack Rich, Betty Richards, Francis Richards, Ray Richardson, BobRiley, Armand Ritchie, Armand Ritchie, Jr. , Ann Ritz, Betty Roberts,

173


173/175

Dr. Don Robertson, Willie Rodriquez, Bill Roe Dolly Roe J.H. Rollins, Marie Ross, Ray Boositer, Beatrice Royce, Bryan Royce, GeorgeRudd, E.W. Sams, Bobby Samuels, Joan Samuels, John Samuels, DavidSanchez, Herman Santos, C.H. Sanburg, Gary Saylin, Leah Sculatti,James Segedin, Robert Sey flour, Lu Shanks, Gene Sharon, LauriSharon, Freda Shelley, Dr. John Shelley, Ursala Sherman, EvelynShook, Ada Simmonds.Ray Simmonds, Ray Simmonds, Jr., Iris Simmons, Betty Sklar, Betty Ann Smith, George Smith, Shirley Smith,Paul Soares, Bette Spaargaren, Evelyn Spardorico, Jerry Spardorico,Gene Spence, Ralph Spitzer, C.W. Stevenson, Berry Stokes, JeanneStother, Larry Stover, Faye Strachen, Clem Street, Janet Sylwesiuk,Bess Tackett , Walt Tackett, Fred Tarp, Edie Thornton, Harold Thornton, Gale Tinsley, George Tomasini, Charlotte Toon, Earl Tutt, JamesTytler, Shirley Tytler, Rudy Urban, Angie Valentine, Val Van Artsdaken, Bill Van Buskirk, Gilbert Vasquez, Glen Vaughn, Tereso C.Venegas, John Vilinsky, Donna Walden, Warren Walter, Allen Ward,Bryan Ward, Wilton a r d ~ a c k Watson, Allen Wayne, Bobby Weickerson, Jean Welton, Edgar' West, Rita West, Jerry Wheatly, ButchWhite, Gary Whitney, Lyall Widdifield, Bernice Williams, Jim Williams, Kaye Winters, Walt Winters, AI Wisner, Frank Witzle, CyrilWood Pearl Wright, Tim Wright, Tom Wright, Carolyn Wyoott, MosesYork, Roy Zackery, Joe Zuniga, and Bobby and Cissy of he LawrenceWelk Program

I want it to be understood that it doesn't mean all the peopleon the foregoing list believe in my theory, and yet, it doesn'tmean that many of them don't.The following were involved with my physical workingmodels: The Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, California(I gave a three-hour presentation and they expressed interest);Dr. Emil Gaveluk, an expert in Space Science (he was veryimpressed); Professor Hart of Solano Community College (aphysics instructor who was impressed); Diane Householder ascience teacher a firm believer); Professor Barney of NapaCommunity College (a physics instructor who could not disprove the theory); T.V. Channel 13, KOVR-Stockton, California (I challenged the science world t go against me. No oneaccepted the challenge); T.V. Channel 8, General Electric Cable Television, Vacaville, California; Napa Cable Television;Cal Expo, Sacramento, California; Napa Town and CountryFair, Napa, California; Crescent School, and the Crystal School,

174


174/175

Suisun, California; the Armijo Adult School, the David WeirSchool, the Fairfield Civic Center, The Morning Lions Club,The Noon Lions Club,- The Morning Kiwanis Club, The NoonKiwanis Club, The Exchange Club, all ofFairfield, California;and The Exchange Club, Suisun, California.

The following have mentioned my theory in newspapers,magazines, radio or at Civic Clubs: Daily Republic Newspaper,Fairfield California; Times Herald Newspaper, Vallejo, California; Vacaville Reporter Newspaper, Vacaville, California;Signalman's Journal (A national trade magazine), MountProspect, Illinois; Southern Pacific Bulletin, A national company magazine, San Francisco; KGO RADIO, San Francisco;and KVON RADIO, Napa, California.George Pope lectured on my theory at Fairfield's Toast Master's Club. The theory is on fUe at the Solano County PublicFree Library in Fairfield, and in The Vacaville Public FreeLibrary.

Major surprisein study ofVenus photos

Venus piecesdon t fit puzzleThese pages have been added at the end of this bookbecause the book was in the process of being published whenthese banner headlines'' hit the newspapers in December,1978.These articles in regard to Venus said the experts weresurprised to find out that Venus is made from a differentsubstance than earth.. Also n The National eographic ofJanuary, 1977, the exper1B were lso surprised to learn

that Mars w s made from a different chemistry, or substancethan earth. My theory is that if all the planets were made upfrom the same substance or had the same chemistry,regardless of their sizes, then they would all be on the sameorbit around our sun. This was brought out n Chapter 5.175


175/175

Evidence SupportsEinstein s Theoryf Gmvity Waves

This banner headline also appeared in all major news-p o p e ~ in December, 1978. The article states that Einstein'sTheory of gravity waves coming at us was more or lessconfirmed . I predicted these gravity waves are coming fromour sun, which is covered in Chapter 1. The article said thegravity waves were coming from an area in space that was15,000 light years away. I want to quote portions of a letter Ireceived from a physics professor in one of our universities.I have just reeeived your collection of flyers in the mail.They make fascinating reading, but unfortunately they arefull of holes . . . n spite o the fact that the electronics

walter c wright - gravity is a push

Documents