washington state climate change impacts assessment: implications of 21 st century climate change for...

25
Washington State Climate Change Impacts Assessment: Implications of 21 st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington Marketa M Elsner 1 with Lan Cuo 2 , Nathalie Voisin 2 , Jeffrey S Deems 2 , Alan F Hamlet 1,2 , Julie A Vano 2 , Kristian EB Mickelson 2 , Se-Yeun Lee 2 , and Dennis P Lettenmaier 1,2 1) Center for Science in the Earth System, Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 2) Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Climate science in the public interest

Post on 22-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Washington StateClimate Change

Impacts Assessment:

Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington

Marketa M Elsner1

with Lan Cuo2, Nathalie Voisin2, Jeffrey S Deems2, Alan F Hamlet1,2, Julie A Vano2, Kristian EB Mickelson2, Se-Yeun Lee2, and Dennis P Lettenmaier1,2

1) Center for Science in the Earth System, Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 981952) Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

Climate science in the public interest

Overview

• Approach– incorporating climate change information into

modeling• Hydrologic Simulations

– Models, their inputs, climate change projections– Focus watersheds

• Findings– Washington and focus watersheds

• Conclusion

Assessment Overview:

Study Region

Global Climate Models2 different emissions scenarios

20 models using A1B (medium scenario)19 models using B1 (low scenario)

Downscaled to regional projections of P and T for the 2020s , 2040s, 2080s

Hydrologic ModelsProjections of future changes in

snowpack, streamflow, soil moisture, etc.

Energy

Water ManagementForests Agriculture

Salmon

Infrastructure

Large Scale Model (VIC) ~12mi2 per cell

Hydrologic Simulations

Fine Scale Model (DHSVM)~6 acres per cell

Climate Change Projections (using “delta method”)

39 Climate Change Scenarios - each is a monthly timeseries of P and T from 2000-2099

3 chosen projection windows

2000 2050 2100

Mean P & T for 2020s (2010-2039)

Mean P & T for 2040s (2030-2059)

Mean P & T for 2080s (2070-2099)

Historical daily timeseries (1916-2006) perturbed by mean monthly P & T (same mean P and T applied to each day in a given month)

New daily timeseries which incorporates historical daily patterns and future projections of precipitation and temperature

Focus Watersheds

• Columbia River– Washington portion

• Puget Sound– Green River– Snohomish River– Cedar River– Tolt River

• Yakima River

Implications of 21st century climate changeon Washington’s watersheds

Elsner, M.M. et al. 2009: Implications of 21st Century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State (in review)

Low

Medium

Yakima River Basin

LowMedium

S.F. Tolt River

Green River

Sultan RiverCedar River

Puget SoundApril 1Snowpack(Snow Water Equivalent)

Results shown are for medium (A1B) emissions scenario

Weekly Snowpack ProjectionsCedar River

Yakima River

LowMedium

LowMedium

Elsner, M.M. et al. 2009: Implications of 21st Century climate change for the hydrology of Washington State (in review)

Rain Dominant Watershed

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

OctNov Dec Ja

nFeb M

ar AprM

ay Jun Ju

lAug Sep

Un

reg

ula

ted

Flo

w (

cfs

)

Historic Simulation

2020 Med. (A1B)

2040 med. (A1B)

2080 med. (A1B)

Chehalis River (at Porter)

Monthly Streamflow Projections

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

OctNov Dec Ja

nFeb M

ar AprM

ay Jun Ju

lAug Sep

Un

reg

ula

ted

Flo

w (

cfs

)Historic Simulation

2020 Med. (A1B)

2040 med. (A1B)

2080 med. (A1B)

Yakima River (at Parker)

Transient Rain-snow Watershed

Monthly Streamflow Projections

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

450,000

OctNov

Dec Jan

Feb Mar Apr

May Ju

nJu

lAug

Sep

Un

reg

ula

ted

Flo

w (

cfs)

Historic Simulation

2020 Med. (A1B)

2040 med. (A1B)

2080 med. (A1B)

Columbia River (The Dalles)

Snowmelt Dominant Watershed

Monthly Streamflow Projections

Cedar River - inflow to Chester Morse Reservoir

Weekly Streamflow Projections

Yakima River at Parker

Key Conclusions Snowpack & Soil Moisture

For Washington, April 1 snowpack (important indicator of summer water supply) is projected to decrease:

– 28% to 29% by the 2020s - low (B1) and medium (A1B) scenario– 38% to 46% by the 2040s -low (B1) and medium (A1B) scenario– 56% to 70% by the 2080s -low (B1) and medium (A1B) scenario

*Sensitive watersheds (e.g. Yakima and Puget Sound basins) are projected to see greater decreases in snowpack

For Washington, July 1 soil moisture is projected to decrease:– 38th to 43rd percentile by the 2020s - low (B1) and medium (A1B) scenario– 35th to 40th percentile by the 2040s - low (B1) and medium (A1B) scenario– 32nd to 35th percentile by the 2080s - low (B1) and medium (A1B) scenario

*50% being equal to mean historical values.

Key Conclusions Streamflow & Runoff

Rivers will respond to climate change differently, depending on the balance of rain versus snow

For Washington as a whole, projected changes in runoff (water into streams) depend strongly on season. – Average cool season (October to March) runoff is projected to

increase 12% by the 2020s, 19% by the 2040s, and 31% by the 2080s– Average warm season (April to September) runoff is projected to

decrease 18% by the 2020s, 24% by the 2040s, and 39% by the 2080s– Annual runoff across the state may see modest increases and these

changes are mainly driven by projected increases in winter precipitation.

The Climate Impacts Groupwww.cses.washington.ed/cig

Marketa McGuire [email protected]

For more information:

Climate Change Projections

Hydrologic Models

Regional Climate Change Scenarios

20 GCMs2 SRES Scenarios – A1B (medium) & B1 (low)-------------------------39 Total CC Scenarios (Monthly Time Series)

Global Climate Models

1. Delta Method Approach• Daily Time Series of Perturbed Historical Record (1915-2006)

2. Bias Correction & Statistical Downscaling (BCSD)• Daily Time Series of Future Record (2001-2099)

VIC (5km latitude x 6km longitude grid)DHSVM (150m grid)

Delta MethodAdvantages• Address impacts of historical

climate variability• Realistic daily time series and

spatial variability• Many realizations of

variability for each scenario

Challenges• Do not incorporate future

climate variability introduced by GCMs

BCSDAdvantages• Incorporate future climate

variability projected by GCMs

• Facilitates trend analysis

Challenges• Current method may

introduce unrealistic daily climate

• Inherits weaknesses of specific GCMs

Climate Change Projections

122 in

0.2 in

75% of annual precipitation (P) in the Cascades falls between October and March