wastewater treatment impacts from ab 32 and climate change

27
Wastewater Treatment Impacts Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change from AB 32 and Climate Change Michael D. Moore Michael D. Moore Environmental and Regulatory Affairs Manager Environmental and Regulatory Affairs Manager Orange County Sanitation District Orange County Sanitation District

Upload: others

Post on 17-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Wastewater Treatment ImpactsWastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Changefrom AB 32 and Climate Change

Michael D. MooreMichael D. Moore Environmental and Regulatory Affairs ManagerEnvironmental and Regulatory Affairs Manager Orange County Sanitation DistrictOrange County Sanitation District

Page 2: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Los AngelesLos Angeles

San DiegoSan Diego

Orange County Sanitation DistrictOrange County Sanitation District

Orange County, California

OCSD Service Area 471 square miles

Santa AnaSanta Ana

Page 3: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Orange County Sanitation DistrictOrange County Sanitation District55thth Largest WWTP in USALargest WWTP in USA

Reclamation Plant No. 1Reclamation Plant No. 1 Treatment PlanTreatment Plant No. 2t No. 2 Fountain ValleyFountain Valley Huntington BeachHuntington Beach

Page 4: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

OverviewOverview

Climate Change RegulationsClimate Change Regulations and Implementationand Implementation

Wastewater TreatmentWastewater Treatment and Greenhouse Gas Emissionsand Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Practical Steps ForwardPractical Steps Forward

Page 5: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Climate ChangeRegulations and Implementation

Climate ChangeRegulations and Implementation

Page 6: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Why is air first?Greenhouse Gases can make the other

climate change symptoms worse.

Why is air first?Greenhouse Gases can make the other

climate change symptoms worse.

GHG Emissions MM Tons CO2 eq.

SOURCE: US EPASOURCE: US EPA

Page 7: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

California RegulationsCalifornia Regulations �2006 California Global Warming

Solutions Act (AB 32)� 1990 Greenhouse Gas (GHG)

levels by 2020� 80% GHG levels by 2050

�California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)� 10+ options to disclose GHG

for construction projects

�Local Air Board� Several rules for CH4, CO,

NOX, SOX, CO2

�2006 California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) � 1990 Greenhouse Gas (GHG)

levels by 2020 � 80% GHG levels by 2050

�California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) � 10+ options to disclose GHG

for construction projects

�Local Air Board � Several rules for CH4, CO,

NOX, SOX, CO2

Page 8: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Early Action ItemsEarly Action Items �� Large facility mandatoryLarge facility mandatory

emissions reportingemissions reporting

�� Low carbon fuel standardLow carbon fuel standard

�� More restrictions onMore restrictions on refrigerantsrefrigerants

�� Landfill methane captureLandfill methane capture

�� Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) reductions in non-electricreductions in non-electric sectorsector

Page 9: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Early Action ItemsEarly Action Items (c(c ontinueontinue dd ))

�� Reduce GHGs inReduce GHGs in consumer productsconsumer products

�� Reduction of PFCs fromReduction of PFCs from semiconductor industrysemiconductor industry

�� Other items aimed atOther items aimed at energy efficiency and fuelsenergy efficiency and fuels

Page 10: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Wastewater TreatmentWastewater Treatment and Greenhouse Gasand Greenhouse Gas

EmissionsEmissions

Page 11: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Expected Direct GHG Emissions for WWTP Processes

Expected Direct GHG Emissions for WWTP Processes

Primary None

Secondary CH4, from anaerobic treatment processes (i.e., lagoons)

Advanced N2O, from NDN process

Solids Handling

CH4, from sludge handling such as digestion (may be considered de minimus) or from incomplete combustion of digester gas and emissions from offsite operations

Effluent Discharge

N2O, from denitrification of nitrogen species originating from wastewater effluent in receiving water

Page 12: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Local Air Resources Board Emissions Inventory

(in MM tons of CO2 eq.)

Local Air Resources Board Emissions Inventory

(in MM tons of CO2 eq.)

Domestic Wastewater Treatment Baseline 2.83

California State Total for 1990 427

2020 “Business as Usual” 600

SOURCE: US EPA and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)SOURCE: US EPA and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Page 13: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Potential GHG Emission SourcesPotential GHG Emission Sources

Emissions

Air Scrubber

Emissions

Manhole Headworks

Solids Reuse

Air Scrubber

EngineGenerators

PrimaryTreatment

SecondaryTreatment

Collections Treatment Plant

Emissions

Emissions

EmissionsEmissions

Emissions

PumpingStation

Chemicals

Emissions

Effluent

Solids DigestorsDewatering

Page 14: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Impact of AB 32on Wastewater Agencies Impact of AB 32

on Wastewater Agencies

Page 15: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Changes in Air and Water TemperatureChanges in Air and WaterTemperature � Impact air quality / odors� Increase in sea water level

and relocation of facilities� Impact of wastewater quality� Need to accommodate existing

and new industry� Need to adjust discharge permit

and pollution control program� Need to review effluent guidelines� Need to adapt NPDES permit

� Impact air quality / odors � Increase in sea water level

and relocation of facilities � Impact of wastewater quality � Need to accommodate existing

and new industry � Need to adjust discharge permit

and pollution control program � Need to review effluent guidelines � Need to adapt NPDES permit

Page 16: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Changes In WeatherChanges In Weather

� Impact of increase rainfalls

� Impact on wastewater operations

� Challenges in accommodating high flows and low flows

� Impact of increase rainfalls

� Impact on wastewater operations

� Challenges in accommodating high flows and low flows

Page 17: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Engineering ChallengesEngineering Challenges

�� AB 32 require facility to be more energy efficientAB 32 require facility to be more energy efficient

�� Need emission and reporting protocol forNeed emission and reporting protocol for wastewater industrywastewater industry

�� Must increase energy productionMust increase energy production

�� Need funds to adapt to climate researchNeed funds to adapt to climate research

�� Need funds to conduct research related toNeed funds to conduct research related to climate changeclimate change

�� Need better estimate of regional impactsNeed better estimate of regional impacts

Page 18: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Practical StepsPractical Steps ForwardForward

Page 19: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

over 40POTWS

StateAgencies

Industries

NationalAgencies

California Wastewater ClimateCalifornia Wastewater Climate Change Group (CWCCG)Change Group (CWCCG)

over 40 POTWS Industries

State Agencies

National Agencies

Develop acceptable

GHG emission protocols

for POTWs

Page 20: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Develop Strategies for FutureDevelop Strategies for Future

�� Work together to present aWork together to present a consistent message basedconsistent message based on good scienceon good science

�� Identify agency approachIdentify agency approach for climate changefor climate change

�� Discuss other issues besidesDiscuss other issues besides emissionsemissions �� Reliability, protecting public healthReliability, protecting public health

�� Long-term sustainable operationsLong-term sustainable operations

�� Mitigating risks to facilities /Mitigating risks to facilities / agenciesagencies

Page 21: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Immediate Climate Change Steps for POTWsImmediate Climate Change Steps for POTWs � Volatile rain period impacts

(peak and dry periods)

� Increased power cost aspower industry is regulated

� Expansion needs for septic systems (GHG and volatilerain failures)

� Emergency preparedness

� Design parameters sensitivities

� Volatile rain period impacts (peak and dry periods)

� Increased power cost as power industry is regulated

� Expansion needs for septic systems (GHG and volatile rain failures)

� Emergency preparedness

� Design parameters sensitivities

Page 22: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Immediate Climate ChangeImmediate Climate Change Steps for POTWsSteps for POTWs (continued)(continued)

�� Equipment ranges (dry, peak)Equipment ranges (dry, peak)

�� Process design parametersProcess design parameters (higher BOD, NH4, TSS)(higher BOD, NH4, TSS)

�� Flood protection (rising seas)Flood protection (rising seas)

�� Future air quality regulationsFuture air quality regulations

�� Future space considerationsFuture space considerations

�� Lifecycle costs (land, power)Lifecycle costs (land, power)

�� Discuss with StakeholdersDiscuss with Stakeholders (elected & customers)(elected & customers)

Page 23: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Other Issues for POTWsOther Issues for POTWs

�� Limited control of sewersLimited control of sewers

�� Public wants existing taxesPublic wants existing taxes to solve new problemsto solve new problems

�� POTWs could be consideredPOTWs could be considered a natural anthropogenica natural anthropogenic processprocess

�� We don’t have the optionWe don’t have the option to go “out-of-business”to go “out-of-business”

Page 24: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

OCSD’s Research EffortsOCSD’s Research Efforts �� Emission controls technologiesEmission controls technologies

�� Deep well injection of biosolidsDeep well injection of biosolids (sludge)(sludge)

�� Characterizing influentsCharacterizing influents (e.g., NH4 increases)(e.g., NH4 increases)

�� Alternative treatmentAlternative treatment technologies with lower energytechnologies with lower energy use or increased poweruse or increased power production potentialproduction potential

�� Add calculation of carbonAdd calculation of carbon footprintfootprint

Page 25: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

ConclusionsConclusions �� Climate change issues willClimate change issues will

effect the design andeffect the design and operation of POTWsoperation of POTWs

�� Need to look at other risksNeed to look at other risks outside normal risksoutside normal risks

�� Need to do sensitivities onNeed to do sensitivities on life cycle costs that climatelife cycle costs that climate change could impactchange could impact

�� Need to calculate ecologicalNeed to calculate ecological footprintfootprint

Page 26: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

Page 27: Wastewater Treatment Impacts from AB 32 and Climate Change

Michael [email protected]

Michael Moore [email protected]

Orange County Sanitation Districtwww.ocsd.com

Orange County Sanitation District www.ocsd.com