water effluent comparison to regulation

60

Upload: others

Post on 18-Dec-2021

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation
Page 2: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corp.

Permit: PE01138

2020-06-16 9:28:15 AM

Period Starting: May 01, 2020

Period Ending: May 31, 2020

FLOW Actual Daily Avg (E3M3/D) 62.1

90_EFF 90th Percentile (Previous 100 Days) 62.7

PROD Actual Daily Avg (ADT/D) 488

90_PROD 90th Percentile (Previous 100 Days) 610

BL Actual Daily Avg (ADT/D) 488

90_CBPROD 90th Percentile (Previous 100 Days) 610

PRODUCTION Reference Production Rate (RPR) 705

TSS Permitted Max (mg/l) 182

Permitted Avg (mg/l) 110

Actual Daily Max (mg/l) 119

Actual Daily Avg (mg/l) 78.1

BOD Permitted Max (mg/l) 73

Actual Daily Max (mg/l) 34

Actual Daily Avg (mg/l) 23.4

AOX Permitted Avg (KG/ADT) 0.60

Actual Daily Avg. (KG/ADT) 0.26

Actual Daily Avg (mg/l) 3

Page: 1 / 1

Page 3: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Biobasin #2 - Temperature (°C)

May 2020

DATE Minimum Temperature Maximum Temperature

01-May 22.4 26.4

02-May 22.8 26.0

03-May 10.4 25.0

04-May 22.7 28.3

05-May 24.1 26.8

06-May 22.7 26.8

07-May 23.3 28.7

08-May 25.6 30.7

09-May 24.6 29.8

10-May 23.5 28.9

11-May 23.5 30.3

12-May 25.3 30.6

13-May 25.4 32.4

14-May 24.8 30.8

15-May 27.4 32.6

16-May 27.4 32.0

17-May 26.3 30.1

18-May 24.7 31.6

19-May 27.6 32.1

20-May 27.7 30.8

21-May 27.6 31.0

22-May 27.5 30.5

23-May 25.4 30.0

24-May 26.1 30.0

25-May 25.3 29.7

26-May 24.6 29.8

27-May 25.2 32.0

28-May 27.0 30.4

29-May 25.2 31.7

30-May 21.4 31.0

31-May 21.3 23.1

Monthly Min./Max. 10.4 32.6

Monthly Average 27.9

Page 4: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Date pH Temperature (⁰C) pH Temperature (⁰C)

01-May 7.04 22.4 7.21 19.3

02-May 6.99 23.7 7.25 21.3

03-May 7.05 24.2 7.30 21.8

04-May 6.98 25.0 7.07 22.0

05-May 6.95 26.1 7.12 19.9

06-May 6.88 25.3 7.01 21.0

07-May 6.80 27.9 6.94 24.8

08-May 6.81 28.7 7.08 24.4

09-May 6.84 25.1 7.23 22.7

10-May 6.83 26.6 7.44 23.1

11-May 6.85 27.8 7.11 23.3

12-May 6.85 27.5 7.03 25.3

13-May 6.85 29.1 7.07 25.0

14-May 6.81 28.5 7.12 23.3

15-May 6.89 29.7 7.10 25.9

16-May 6.95 28.1 7.12 28.8

17-May 6.89 29.1 7.07 24.8

18-May 6.95 29.1 7.13 24.2

19-May 6.96 30.6 7.12 27.5

20-May 6.94 29.6 7.51 26.5

21-May 6.93 29.7 7.47 28.0

22-May 6.91 29.1 7.56 26.7

23-May 6.92 26.1 7.52 24.0

24-May 6.93 26.8 7.44 25.5

25-May 6.89 28.9 7.46 24.7

26-May 6.90 27.2 7.69 23.4

27-May 6.87 28.3 7.68 24.8

28-May 6.86 29.2 7.46 26.0

29-May 6.85 29.5 7.44 25.7

30-May 6.80 29.3 7.41 18.7

31-May 6.87 28.4 7.43 26.9

Field Laboratory

May-20

Biobasin #2

pH & Temperature

Page 5: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Date

01-May 2060

02-May 1990

03-May 1959

04-May 1923

05-May 1893

06-May 1891

07-May 1919

08-May 1960

09-May 1928

10-May 1911

11-May 1899

12-May 1900

13-May 1601

14-May 1591

15-May 1594

16-May 1522

17-May 1532

18-May 1519

19-May 1509

20-May 1506

21-May 1510

22-May 1560

23-May 1487

24-May 1451

25-May 1429

26-May 1406

27-May 1406

28-May 1384

29-May 1370

30-May 1380

31-May 1366

Monthly Min/Max 1366 2060

Monthly Average 1657

May 2020

#2BO-24 hr-Conductivity (µS/cm)

Biobasin #2 Conductivity

Page 6: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Date

01-May 724

02-May 645

03-May 617

04-May 580

05-May 740

06-May 540

07-May 480

08-May 810

09-May 730

10-May 570

11-May 540

12-May 660

13-May 710

14-May 760

15-May 601

16-May 584

17-May 538

18-May 562

19-May 571

20-May 566

21-May 588

22-May 597

23-May 529

24-May 520

25-May 569

26-May 505

27-May 488

28-May 489

29-May 413

30-May 431

31-May 415

Monthly Min/Max 413 810

Monthly Average 583

May 2020

#2BO-24hr COD (mg/L)

Biobasin #2 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Page 7: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

DATE Ammonia Ammonia Nitrate Nitrite

NH4 - N NH4 - N NO3 - N NO2 - N Dissolved Total

PO4 - P PO4 - P

01-May 1.35

02-May 1.43

03-May 0.98

04-May 0.81

05-May 0.18 0.123 <0.0500 <0.0100 5.07 0.0364 0.464

06-May 0.19

07-May 0.75

08-May 0.03

09-May 0.21

10-May 0.49

11-May 0.83

12-May 1.38

13-May 1.46

14-May 0.78

15-May 1.06

16-May 1.57

17-May 2.00

18-May 1.89

19-May 1.45

20-May 2.84

21-May 3.71

22-May 2.77

23-May 3.49

24-May 3.61

25-May 2.58

26-May 2.46

27-May 3.59

28-May 3.23

29-May 0.62

30-May 1.27

31-May 1.10

PhosphorusTotal

Kjeldahl

Nitrogen

Biobasin #2 - Nutrients (mg/L)

May 2020

Tested In-

houseTested by ALS Environmental

Page 8: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

8664 Commerce Court, Burnaby, BC V5A 4N7

Acute Toxicity Test Results

Sample #2BO – GRAB – 05/05/2020,

collected May 05, 2020

Final Report

May 21, 2020

Submitted to: Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Mackenzie, BC

Page 9: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200776 – 200777 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 1

SAMPLE INFORMATION

Sample ID

Dates Receipt

temp. Collected Received Rainbow trout

test initiation

Daphnia magna

test initiation

#2BO – GRAB –

05/05/2020

05-May-20 at

0830h

06-May-20

at 0915h

07-May-20 at

1750h

06-May-20 at

1505h 14.4°C

TESTS

• Rainbow trout 96-h LC50 test

• Daphnia magna 48-h LC50 test

RESULTS

Toxicity test results

Sample ID LC50 (% v/v)

Rainbow trout Daphnia magna

#2BO – GRAB – 05/05/2020 >100 >100

LC = Lethal Concentration

QA/QC

QA/QC summary Rainbow trout Daphnia magna

Reference toxicant LC50 (95% CL)

97.8 (72.9 – 131.1) µg/L Zn1

5.5 (4.4 – 6.9) g/L NaCl2

Reference toxicant historical mean

(2 SD range) 100.9 (54.1 – 188.3) µg/L Zn 6.2 (4.7 – 8.2) g/L NaCl

Reference toxicant CV 32% 14%

Organism health history Acceptable Acceptable

Protocol deviations None None

Water quality range deviations None None

Control performance Acceptable Acceptable

Test performance Valid Valid

1Test Date: April 13, 2020;

2 Test Date: May 06, 2020; LC = Lethal Concentration, CL = Confidence Limits, SD =

Standard Deviation, CV = Coefficient of Variation

Page 10: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200776 – 200777 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 2

Report By: Reviewed By:

Ditty Kakkassery, R.P. Bio Andy Diewald, B.Sc.

Laboratory Biologist Senior Analyst

This report has been prepared by Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. based on data and/or samples

provided by our client and the results of this study are for their sole benefit. Any reliance on the data by a

third party is at the sole and exclusive risk of that party. The results presented here relate only to the

samples tested.

Page 11: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX A – Summary of test conditions

Page 12: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Table 1. Summary of test conditions: 96-h rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

LC50 test.

Test species Oncorhynchus mykiss

Organism source Hatchery

Organism age Juvenile

Test type Static

Test duration 96 hours

Test vessel 20-L glass aquarium

Test volume 10 to 20 L (depending on size of fish)

Test solution depth ≥15 cm

Test concentrations Five concentrations, plus laboratory control

Test replicates 1 per treatment

Number of organisms 10 per replicate

Control/dilution water Dechlorinated Metro Vancouver municipal tapwater

Test solution renewal None

Test temperature 15 ± 1°C

Feeding None

Light intensity 100 to 500 lux

Photoperiod 16 hours light / 8 hours dark

Aeration 6.5 ± 1 mL/min/L

Test measurements

Temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH measured daily;

salinity measured in the undiluted sample at test initiation;

conductivity measured at test initiation and termination;

survival checked daily

Test protocol Environment Canada (2000), EPS 1/RM/13, with 2007 & 2016

amendments

Statistical software CETIS Version 1.9.4

Test endpoint Survival (96-hour LC50)

Test acceptability criterion for controls Survival ≥90%

Reference toxicant Zinc (added as ZnSO4)

Page 13: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Table 2. Summary of test conditions: 48-h Daphnia magna LC50 test.

Test species Daphnia magna

Organism source In-house culture

Organism age <24-hour old neonates

Test type Static

Test duration 48 hours

Test vessel 250-mL glass beaker

Test volume 200 mL

Test solution depth 6 cm

Test concentrations Five concentrations, plus laboratory control

Test replicates 1 per treatment

Number of organisms 10 per replicate

Control/dilution water Moderately-hard reconstituted water + 2.5 µg/L Se

Test solution renewal None

Test temperature 20 ± 2°C

Feeding None

Light intensity 400 to 800 lux

Photoperiod 16 hours light / 8 hours dark

Aeration None

Test measurements

Temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH measured daily;

salinity, hardness and alkalinity measured in the undiluted

sample at test initiation; conductivity measured at test

initiation and termination; survival checked daily

Test protocol Environment Canada (2000), EPS 1/RM/14, with 2016

amendments

Statistical software CETIS Version 1.9.4

Test endpoint Survival (48-hour LC50)

Test acceptability criterion for controls Survival ≥90%

Reference toxicant Sodium chloride (NaCl)

Page 14: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX B – Toxicity test data

Page 15: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Rainbow Trout Summary Sheet

Client:

Work Order No.:

Sample Information:

Sample ID:

Sample Date:

Date Received:

Sample Volume:

Other:

Dilution Water:

oii'2BO - CrmJ,O - cs f~sl2,2o

M "'ij os- . ?o 20

Test Species: Oncorhynchus mykiss

Test Validity Criteria:

~ 90% control survival

WQRanges:

T CC) = 15 ± 1; DO (mg/l) = 7.0 to 10.3; pH= 5.5 to 8.5

Type: Dechlorinated Municipal Tap Water

Hardness (mg/L CaC03): ID Alkalinity (mg/L CaC03):

Test Organism Information:

Batch No.: 03il20a

Source:

No. FishNolume (L):

Loading Density (g/L):

Mean Length ± SD (mm): Range: 3 3 - 1; '5

Mean Weight± SD (g): Range: o·36 - 1-ol

Zinc Reference Toxicant Results:

Reference Toxicant ID:

Stock Solution ID: 19U.o5 Date Initiated:

96-h LC50 (95% CL): qu { 72.9- i3i.l) "?''- 2'1

Reference Toxicant Mean and Historical Range:

Reference Toxicant CV (%): 21.

Test Results:

Reviewed by:

Version 1.4; Issued May 29, 2015.

Page 16: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

96-Hour Rainbow Trout Toxicity Test Data Sheet

Client/Project#:

Sample I. D.

W.O.#

RBT Batch#:

Date Collected/Time:

Date Setup/Time:

CER#:

Sample Setup By:

Thermometer:~

Mnvl<i'.r,"i,Q, Rtlp tl\.\\ CoC(lo~tJ1oD it ·z&J- 61 Q/1£- o'f!o;r f7&7£J - --

IJ1_

;- ... ' D.O. meter/probe:~ P::L j Cond./Salinity meter/probe: .(Z I Cl'Z- 5' pH meter/probe: ('2::: 1 ?:~ } P -p-

,.... ""

'"" Number FishNolume: ...L\li.L)-"/~"""'.::c...:l.::e:s'c_'- ______ _

7-d% Mortality: ....,,--,....,,-_i:.:·"=-:--------Total Pre-aeration Time (mins): #~ i I 0 __ Aeration rate adjusted to 6.5 ± 1 mL/min/L? (Y/N): _!.\ -----

Undiluted Sample WQ

Parameters lnitiaiWQ Adjustment 30 minWQ

Temp 'C 15'.s / /{.('

D.O. (mg/L) 3.1 / 5"3 pH 1.7.. / 1.~ Cond. (~S/cm) 1?1>7 .. / n9t Salinity (ppt) 0.') I 0."'

Concentration #Survivors Temperature ('C) Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) pH Conductivity

(IJ (~S/cm)

(% v/v) 1 2 4 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96 0 96

(Jr \ I ~C. 10 vo q tq.o 1·>.o IS II ,,_0 iS.o I(~ 'l.\l % q,'f Cf,J 1:z. '"\.1. I.) 7:1.. '1.1. Jz. 3'1 b~"Z.S"' \0 lo /O {0 1'~- ))'.o (S,D ~-0 Ito C!;-1 cl.\ 92 lq,q 'I'{ r··z.. 1-4 7>?.

-~--'1.3 1'11 15"2-

11..) \ll /0 /.0 10 ~~-\) \)--:'0 t~":>{) 4".0 IS!) elf! "l.(, "/:7 14.'6 9.{ "1.1 .,,, IS 1.~ :l& 1.'3B 2'-l'f ?.~ \0 ;0 '1-0 IO pL) IS. v 15-0 I c;. o IS.D Ci.~ ·~.~

9(, lti-~ q_<; "1 .":( 1.<1 g,., /."/ 'f.[ 1.{"1] L(qq

So 1\l lO lO IQ \o.\~ 1->.0 /•;,v /P 1\.D q,J "1:1 c.; .c. lq.;r q_b i.Y i '6 -\ £_,,, I z:t. a.; "lil'\ 91/ IOO l\l (0 10 1\) r:::\) li:,; !5o li<;.o 1\.o ,,'2 q.~ ').L q.1 '1-( '1S IR.t. £~l g.s- '$.~ W1B 11os'

Initials #- ~1"1 iU'f It<- !lA- L,.c: ','V/ I wilY M.. -c.z Svi'J )l.!lf' ,...__

"'"' t'-7- !o,f-1 lftt\(" ;t-v A- ,.,_

" 1..rh,J , ll:v"'h ~y1J 1

_,

l!::f;lfl mdl atfe;u, hf9'-"h aurhw.ltttfCJ I ' I

Fish Description at 96 h ~"'«~'''''' f,,~ ~Pfl"' M (""'..( Number of Stressed Fish at 96 h /

Other Observations: (/) w..eJ tJ/d - 6 . f

Reviewed by: ---------"''----- Date Reviewed: fnJ I y '/..'>

Version 2.5; Issued July 19, 2017 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc.

Page 17: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Client:

Work Order No.:

Sample Information:

Sample ID:

Sample Date:

Date Received:

Sample Volume:

Daphnia magna Summary Sheet

~:ffhz/-G I!.+ tftti Start Date/Time II"'? ti-,& .... e ts-ori. Z-<>o 7-7-(. C., fhr..::Pu•. Test Species: ---'6~aapo:;h"n!.!:ia"-!.!m!.!:a~g~n"a ___ _

Set up by: __ £J.,@<t!11f:r:~_,.'----

Test Validity Criteria:

;::. 90% mean control survival and/or mobility and :52

:t:IZ.8o - 6,.J;- os-,kd:z..-z,., daphnids exibit immobility and/or mortality in any

&p e~/-zoz, ' single control replicate.

Ap ot,/~ ""' WQ Ranges:

'Z../ z.,t.. T CC) = 20 ± 2; DO (mg/L) = 3.6 to 9.4; pH= 6 to 8.5

Test Organism Information:

Brood stock No.:

Age of young (Day 0): <24 h

Avg No. young per brood in previous 7 d: 6 Mortality(%) in previous 7 d:

Days to first brood:

NaCI Reference Toxicant Results:

Reference Toxicant ID:

Stock Solution ID:

Date Initiated:

48-h LC50 (95% CL):

;il>f Reference Toxicant Mean and Historical Range: f,. Z GrY.r-q.z.)rL NaCL Reference Toxicant CV (%): ____ ..!to:J'ft_ _________ _

Test Results:

Reviewed by: Date reviewed: ---):..._+_':...{1-Y-==---

Version 1.5~ Issued Sep. 30,2015 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc.

Page 18: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Freshwater Acute

48 Hour Toxicity Test Data Sheet

Client:

Sample ID:

Work Order No.:

t!YhaV'<. /?.vf' /)j.;ij h.,--.-~-M>" Start Date/Time: ~ #6,/.-ze,ZoQ /9)_4_ :ft=u;c: - &.c.,b - o s /" ">",/ -z._z_o CER #: ----''---------

-u>o r ?= b ' No. Organisms/volume: -::-'1"'0/c=2;e;OO"'m"'L"--------

Test Organism: _,o"'.m"-a"'g'7n:':a=,----------

Set up by: /fft-P

Thermometer:({,(~-;;' pH meter/probe: _____{g__!_f,z_ DO meter/probe: _f_1~ Cond./Salinity meter/probe: _i,_;_£_

Concentration Number of No.

Temperature Dissolved oxygen pH Conductivity

Live Organisms Immobilized

("C) (mg/L) (~S/cm)

Z(vlv) Rep

24 48 48 0 24 48 0 24 48 0 24 48 0 48

Co..-t.-<> f A ifl 10 '() l11..o 111-0 (\.Q 1~.4-- g,--( '6·3 !i'.'L ~.a 8·2 S'So 3b\

B

c D

;;,. ·z ,- A 10 lO '() jq.o Ao ;q.o i('.b ~-"'

~·':', llS. I 'K ... ~ '0 .¢1 L/?.1- 43"!-.

B J"

c D

l'l-''5' A IV i'O 0 1'1.0 ltt-"' lq.o ~-0 ~.I t·3 'b.o KP ~.Q ~'27 S2b

B

c D

7,...'6 A IV to 0 IP [ft.,i? 1'\.1) ~4 +..l> 'l·lo I.+. '1 ltc Z·D I roT '1-0\

B

c D

S"'O A IU 10 0 llij;V lt1..P 1Cj.1) I ~----c ~.S" &.'I, '7.3 c;;. '0 t·o (eLf-$ i04-3.

B

c D

[QO A I 1\1 IO () l'l..o Itt.;-.? \"\.1) '£f-o 4-.~ ~·l 1'7.5 7,1! ?.\. /7{<, l'fo'T

B

c D

Technician Initials II,\; I!, JiA) .J\J\) !<UY IJ;«<-fl' J~~ lt.iUf ltUvf ·Jw /)l.f tiW ttJ>r df!j? /ft4f n11a us men use

Hardness" I Alkalinltv" Teme ("Cl j£{.0 '

( 1.0 Concentration •(m /Las CaCo3l DO_lmg/L) 3.'f mJ>J: J \ '(:o Control IMHWl iOCJ ~+ H ~-4 '.t.. ">IN~ ..., . .., Highest cone. L'30 Zli"- Cond (uS/em f'f'Z.o

, l-:Hb

Hardness adjusted - Salinity (ppt) n.tl Q."(

Comments:

Sample Description:

Mortality: Heartbeat checked under microscope "-<5i: ,..e '1. toi.

"'i"'bA b-.;o>-'"' ~,..;~."...:~, I>.Jp ..,;\l DMvtn. Dollw·n p~v--1.t<J:"' ·

Batch#: b12%7ol[, 7~d previous# young/brood: 2 b Previous 7~d Mortality (%): __ o ___ Day of 1st Brood: __ q_!_ __

Reviewed by: Date reviewed: ----~--""'\4' _..!.I..:::~..;.!_.'U:I,_ ____ _

Version 1.9; Issued July 19, 2017 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc.

Page 19: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX C – Chain-of-custody form

Page 20: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

TESTING LOCATION (Please Circle)

G ~~H!!~N~~ Chain of Custody

Burnaby 8664

Commerce Court Burnaby, British

Columbia, Canada VSA 4N7

Phone 604.420.8773 Date _p ---- . -"'- .

Report to: Invoice To: ANAL VSES REQI IRED

Company Mackenzie Pulp Mill Core:oration Company Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Address PO Box 2609, 1000 Coquiwaldi Rd. Address PO Box 2609, 1000 Coquiwaldi Rd. ~ City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, VOJ 2CO City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, VOJ 2CO ~ ~

~ = ~

"" Contact Randeep Sandhu Contact Kim Harnett ro

~ -e B ~

Phone 250·997·2444 Phone 250·997·2473 "' ~

~ c ro ·e s Email MPMC-Environment@mackenzieQUI():.com Email [email protected] 0 ID ~·.· ~ g; "' MPMC-T echnical@mackenzi8!2ulp.com PO No. OJ c ~

43011427 ~ ·e J ro 0 ro ID f c ~ c ~ Sample Collection By: KV/CA Sample Type: Grab X OR Composite 0 "' u "' v ~

ro ~ ro ~ w " .· •.w.•.•,-.w .• ··········"'-"•"•'"-"• ••.. ,. .•• ·.w.·.-.·.•. N.w .. ·.• •.. , .·.w.·.·.••.••••······"·"-"'•"'-, •• ,-.w . .-.•.·.•.·.w •.• , •. w>.-.•.•,-.•.•.·.•···' N ...-.·.wN •• •.v .• •.·.•·· .·.•.w . .-c.w., .·.•.w. c.•.·C."'•'"•"•"•"•N-"'· .·.·.·.wN.·." •• •"-"'•"·'•"·"·"• .·.•.·.·.·.·c;·.·c.·' ...... , •... •.•.•.w.·.·.·.w.-c • .-.-.-.-••••.•• ,: E 1- E 1- il ci

~

ci ~

#OF CONTAINERS AND "' "' " SAMPLE ID DATE TIME MATRIX COMMENTS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

VOLUME (e.g. 1 x 20 L) 00 "' 00 "' ~

" 0'> " "' "' 1 #280 · GRAB· 05/05/2020 05·May·20 8:30 water 2 X 20 L X X X /1.( _If

2 I

3

4

5

6 ••

7 I

·.· ..

8 ~ "' "' (::

9 ::? ~ ~ .•

1 0 ;::2) 2:J SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS (CUENn _.• SAMPLE RECEIP'J'DETI\ILSi(LABORATOR't') •·••· · ·: .•.. ·. : S.A.MPLE DESCRIPTION AND c()IIIIMENTS CLABilRATORV) • :

Sample confirmation redept, mortality update and report to required: 1. Total No. of . · ·.· . ·

······[···.····· .. · ...•.. 4/lce ~Jr~serit fJtN .'·

•••••

· .. ... ·.···.·· . .. : ·.· ..................

Containers· .. - · . .-- ·: ird:~o,er·r.:. ·. :. .......... ·. .· ...... ·.· . . . ·.

l¢»1"'!; ~; -_~e~.~--~tese~t I Y/(' .·.· .. ·.·· .•. • •••• 2. Court~~- ·

· ..

kvandara@ mackenziepulp.com; on·coolet? ·

. · .. ·. ..· ..

£abbott@mackeoziepulp.£om

3~ ·Good Condition?_·::.-.-:_:··. .. /)'''··· ~::-~-~it_l.idS:: . . :._· . . .··· I Present on v'!)

. . ·.·, I . ·~·I? .. ·.· .·..... ····· i RELINQUISHED BY (CLIENT) .. ·•·••· .·.·· ..• RECEIVED BY(~BClRATORV) . . · .. ·· .••.••... · •·• I

~~~.A / r¥(P"A .·.. . .· .. ·.· ·.··· . .. rr>f-1. ·• ...•.•.... · .. ·. · .... I Kl-U1>Wo\.\ Vall'l.:I....V. ~-· (Printed Name) ·._.·_ ,· .: ··_-:_ · :· -(Si natur~l .·:_.:-._·:.-:.-:.- · ·.

... · (Print Name) ature ....

M~tie f<A-lf. M~££:!:~uo M~lrfv · .. ··••••··•···•·····••··. ./'1~N-J 6/2fl~'lrl$ · .. · . · .. · ··.

(Com an Com an) .· :.:·' ·._;_-_: "~ ·.- .-. ·· Date:mdTimel

Additional costs may be required for sample disposal or storage. Payment net 30 unless otherwise contracted.

Page 21: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

END OF REPORT

Page 22: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

8664 Commerce Court, Burnaby, BC V5A 4N7

Acute Toxicity Test Results

Sample #2BO – GRAB – 12/05/2020,

collected May 12, 2020

Final Report

May 27, 2020

Submitted to: Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Mackenzie, BC

Page 23: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200878 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 1

SAMPLE INFORMATION

Sample ID

Dates Receipt

temperature Collected Received Daphnia magna

test initiation

#2BO – GRAB –

12/05/2020

12-May-20 at

0730h

13-May-20 at

1130h

13-May-20 at

1925h 8.1oC

TEST

• Daphnia magna 48-h LC50 test

RESULTS

Toxicity test results

Sample ID LC50 (% v/v)

#2BO – GRAB – 12/05/2020 >100

LC = Lethal Concentration

QA/QC

QA/QC summary Daphnia magna

Reference toxicant LC50 (95% CL) 5.5 (4.4 – 6.9) g/L NaCl1

Reference toxicant historical mean

(2 SD range) 6.2 (4.7 – 8.2) g/L NaCl

Reference toxicant CV 14%

Organism health history Acceptable

Protocol deviations None

Water quality range deviations None

Control performance Acceptable

Test performance Valid

1 Test date: May 06, 2020, LC = Lethal Concentration, SD = Standard Deviation, CL = Confidence Limits,

CV = Coefficient of Variation

Page 24: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200878 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 2

Report By: Reviewed By:

Marcus Lee-Fraizer, B.Sc. Edmund Canaria, R.P. Bio.

Laboratory Biologist Senior Analyst

This report has been prepared by Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. based on data and/or samples

provided by our client and the results of this study are for their sole benefit. Any reliance on the data by

a third party is at the sole and exclusive risk of that party. The results presented here relate only to the

samples tested.

Page 25: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX A – Summary of test conditions

Page 26: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Table 1. Summary of test conditions: 48-h Daphnia magna LC50 test.

Test species Daphnia magna

Organism source In-house culture

Organism age <24-hour old neonates

Test type Static

Test duration 48 hours

Test vessel 250-mL glass beaker

Test volume 200 mL

Test solution depth 6 cm

Test concentrations Five concentrations, plus laboratory control

Test replicates 1 per treatment

Number of organisms 10 per replicate

Control/dilution water Moderately-hard reconstituted water + 2.5 µg/L Se

Test solution renewal None

Test temperature 20 ± 2°C

Feeding None

Light intensity 400 to 800 lux

Photoperiod 16 hours light / 8 hours dark

Aeration None

Test measurements

Temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH measured daily;

salinity, hardness and alkalinity measured in the undiluted

sample at test initiation; conductivity measured at test

initiation and termination; survival checked daily

Test protocol Environment Canada (2000), EPS 1/RM/14, with 2016

amendments

Statistical software CETIS Version 1.9.4

Test endpoint Survival (48-hour LC50)

Test acceptability criterion for controls Survival ≥90%

Reference toxicant Sodium chloride (NaCl)

Page 27: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX B – Toxicity test data

Page 28: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Daphnia magna Summary Sheet

Client:

Work Order No.:

~-,;/,:_ /"fz//1// Start Date!Time: jif~ f>/Z.,-z.o€_

£,oo g CT ¥....-.&..oz;~ Test Species: ~phnia magna

Set up by: ty,/1{,(

LflYI._

Sample Information: Test Validity Criteria:

Sample ID: ::?: 90% mean control survival and/or mobility and S2

# 'Zt'o - 6-~h ·- / 7.1/<•r/;z.,-,..., daphnids exibit immobility and/or mortality in any

Sample Date:

Date Received:

~ /Z /?-.9 z 0 single control replicate.

Sample Volume:

//1'"1 /J %u-....,, WQ Ranges:

z_ -I'.'. / L T ("C) = 20 ± 2; DO (mg/L) = 3.6 to 9.4; pH = 6 to 8.5

Test Organism Information:

Brood stock No.: b<./zq2oA:t8"'C.. Age of young (Day 0): <24 h

Avg No. young per brood in previous 7 d: /4 Mortality(%) in previous 7 d: e,

Days to first brood: 8

NaCl Reference Toxicant Results:

Reference Toxicant ID: /)~~ ..>'0 Stock Solution ID: 2<:>A/~.() '-Date Initiated:

48-h LCSO (95% CL): 41,, tJ 4 /k>Zc<>

S-: > L 1/-" Y ;_ ,',. '1 ) g/LNaCL

Reference Toxicant Mean and Historical Range: {,. Z. (¥- 7- - z. '2.) g/L NaCL

Reference T oxicant CV (% ):

Test Results: -Z:L 7!',!.,( {LSD cl q-z-,./4.,,__<,__,/ Z,, ..6..:... >/Pc Z.(v/4-)

Reviewed by: ~ Date reviewed: ~ ~I ;;:>bJ.i)

Version 1.5; Issued Sep. 30, 2015 Nautilus Environmental Company !nc.

Page 29: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Freshwater Acute

Client:

Sample ID:

Work Order No.:

48 Hour Toxicity Test Data Sheet

.&, 4-.. p <- B-f ik,: II /4...r.,_-=~ Start Date/Time: L I ~/z, ~ <2 N2.s L #-z..gc; -G.,,-.,k ·• -/.;..z../'Zc,u, CER#:_~-'"'--------

,z,,po 8:r:• 12. '.,,,. No. Organisms/volume:-'1-"0/c:2cc.0"'0m=L ______ _

,..,,_ - • TestOrganism:"O~.m=ag"'n~a-______ _

Setupby: /,(t,t,£:

Thermometer. CfJ!.ll:,;: pH meter/probe: ..}Q_1_J;z_ DO meter/probe: _.f:__l_j:2_ Cond.lSalinity nieterlprobe: .Jz.J_f,_

Concentration

%,(v/v)

Numberof I No. I I I I I Live Organisms Immobilized

1 Rep I ,

Temperature

('C) Dissolved oxygen

(mg/L)

pH Conductivity

(µSiem)

24 I 48 48 o I 24 I 48 I o I 24 I 48 I o I 24 I 48 I o I 48

/'-.,-t,,., / A I tQlio ,D i<i..olJti:o I 1-,:-> I fH'l~i}f,}]Jt. / jg 61 J:,.( I SS"t> I "?S'Y B

C

D

L ~- ·z 'S" A 11.o I lo 0 1q.ojf'1.cl1q,ol g".c,j',Z-xJ@<i~o!J~"!lS:( l</<eoJ "t'fvl

B

C

D

11,,JS" A II{) L10 -~ - 0 fw>_V.f. o !r_i;zi}_[j:,]:? 1 l J:.-;;J-11-'l ITfll .i:. 0 I s-z."l I en 1

B Cl-'

C

D

7%' A Ito l/o D ~-s-Jt1.0~'7P !1S.'fl'{fj;i.:Q1,1-Ti:Z !Jc-°! 700 \ ·rr-i-B

C

D

g'"O A 1/0 110 D rnsiN.olt"l,"1'15-"l.lkbl i..:.f \?.b!7.l I ""-"'1 lio~"l 11.,,,4 ,

B

C

D

J,00 A 1TITT10 C> fl~,o ilti .d 1"JJl\·p0 I 4:.l,! \$"\:.I 1-~ 1, b 11-ff'll 11t. I 1:J1 r B

C

D

Technician Initials I ciikl l,;tlv I (1""- I~ 111/Jf, ju~ /lWla>tl~I:11/?Jli>Yl,,w--l&~ rl.i,..,,..

Concentl]lt!on

Control (MH1""

Highest q_onc.

Hardness adjusted

Comments:

Hardness ... Alkalinitv*

*fll}_g_/_~ as CaCo3l

,; re I ::1-x .... /~o '2 "7--<:,

Sample Description: ~/4-d ,d-L /4:,.,.-: 7

Batch#: t'Ji-/Z '/ /,t,flHjJ,{(,7 .d previous# young/brood: / C,

Reviewed by: @:

Version 1.9: Issued July 19, 2017

-Act·astment- -A:-crusre

"-0 -/

./ //

1\-,.,r Mortality: Heartbeat checked _under microscope~ 'i:.t.

.., /44-1:.J , 4/4-,., v/4,,..,..- , f'PA-,_ ~-;?/u./4.-w ~ t/7/ ; 7

Previous 7~d Mortality{%): 0 Day of 1st Brood: __ 'g=---

Date reviewed: ~ 2-D ?1)Y!

Nautilus Environmental Company Inc,

Page 30: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX C – Chain-of-custody form

Page 31: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

G ~1H!!~N~~ Report to:

Company Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Address PO Box 2609, 1000 Coquiwaldi Rd.

City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, V0J 2C0

Contact Randeep Sandhu

Phone 250-997-2444

Email MPMC-Environment@mackenziepu!p.com

[email protected]

Sample Collection By: KV/CA ··'•'···•·•·•·•••.••· ·····•·••;,•.•,••.·.••w.•; .• ,,•;,•,•••••••'•,w, ·•.•;,•,••··.w...-,•··•···• • . ·.•••···w··•··••·•·•w.-;, ., •••. w,w .••. , .......... , •.

SAMPLE ID DATE TIME MATRIX

1 #2B0 - GRAB - 12/05/2020 12-May-20 7:30 water

2 2

I

4 4

;

6

7

8

9

10

'

' SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS (CLIENT}

Sample confirmation reciept, mortality update and report to required:

[email protected];

[email protected]

RELINQUISHED BY (CLIENT)

i,,io<Nam,) Cle\\\'\'_ -~)he.++ ~;I-.~ ~4/{A) , . -n !um)

Cornr,anv\ /v\oc.v\ C /l/lP (Date/Time'

TESTING LOCATION (Please Circle)

Burnaby 8664

Commerce Court Burnaby, British

Columbia, Canada VSA 4N7

Phone 604.420.8773

Invoice To:

Company Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Address PO Box 2609, 1000 Coquiwa!di Rd.

City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, V0J 2C0

Contact Kim Hornett

Phone 250-997-2473

Email [email protected]

PO No. 43011427

Sample Type: Grab X OR Composite O ,.w,w,•., .w,w.•,·.w,•,•;,•;,•;. N,,•,•.,v .• ·,.w.w.•;,•. ,•,•N,W,N,' ;,w, .•.w .•. , .• •,•••'-'•'•'•·•·••;,w,w, .~ .•.•,•,•••·••v;.•.; .• ·• ,w.

# OF CONTAINERS ANO

VOLUME (e.g. l x 20 L) COMMENTS

2x1L 20011g

·. SAMPLE RECEIPT l>ETAILS(LABORAT.ORY) i • : .• ..

1. TOtiil NO; o·t ·• 4.'·ke Present ~ioi i col'll:'illners· •. 2-- . - ... 1nt·ooif!r? :,: . ··.· •-, "• ·· ..

·.· ·.· .• .

i)··. 2. C(IUtler /.:otJ,..,,_,.r 5; Sfll'il .Pre·serit <

. •· i ·.· ~~ ,COO_l~r,(' \:.:

.·· .. ,,', .-•, : ~.::_J.~lt,la!~::._·,.'.·/

~--·•··•···

3. ·90,0:d. COndltl_On?_ {JIN.\ r.r.~_se~t-.~,~:{/' :•,,''.

,-. __ . ·-.-.· S~al?.>· .-· ·,<;·.. · ·

. • _i • .. ·. RECEIVED .BY. (LABORATORY) . ._· .. ·. ·.

1~ ·. / >y ·. •·• .. ··••. ·t11 .· / ·· ..

- . ·. · ·1Si~nii1UreJ \·.:_'.

·.

(Printed Name) : .. ..

.· . ··· .

r1~7 I 3/:JJJ ;1c:io ),1.,v$(/4,J" l1cornllii11,;1 · ·. ·._ : ,.'1Dateand!ime1 ;,, -· ·:,

Additional costs may be 'required for sample. disposal or storage. Payment net 30 unless otherwise contracted.

Chain of Custody

Date ___ p -ANALYSES REOUIRED

.

= 0

~ '-e

C = m

~ f· -9,

"" w

C 0. C m E ·2 a.

0 w - ~ "' ~ "' V

~ C ~

~ ·2 1 m 0 ro w s C

"' C

~ 0, cl "' C il! m ro C w

E I- E !- ;s ci "' ci "' ro

"' "' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ "" 00 J, 00 J, "' st "" st "' 0:

X X s. l .

..

SAMPLE DESC_RIPTION AND COMMENTS (IABORATORY) .

· .. .. . . . .

··•·•·

I> ..

I . .

.

· ..

.

Page 32: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

END OF REPORT

Page 33: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

8664 Commerce Court, Burnaby, BC V5A 4N7

Acute Toxicity Test Results

Sample #2BO – GRAB – 19/05/2020,

collected May 19, 2020

Final Report

June 3, 2020

Submitted to: Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Mackenzie, BC

Page 34: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200922 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 1

SAMPLE INFORMATION

Sample ID

Dates Receipt

temperature Collected Received Daphnia magna

test initiation

#2BO – GRAB –

19/05/2020

19-May-20 at

0820h

20-May-20 at

1125h

20-May-20 at

1440h 8.9oC

TEST

• Daphnia magna 48-h LC50 test

RESULTS

Toxicity test results

Sample ID LC50 (% v/v)

#2BO – GRAB – 19/05/2020 >100

LC = Lethal Concentration

QA/QC

QA/QC summary Daphnia magna

Reference toxicant LC50 (95% CL) 5.5 (4.4 – 6.9) g/L NaCl1

Reference toxicant historical mean

(2 SD range) 6.2 (4.7 – 8.2) g/L NaCl

Reference toxicant CV 14%

Organism health history Acceptable

Protocol deviations None

Water quality range deviations None

Control performance Acceptable

Test performance Valid

1 Test date: May 06, 2020, LC = Lethal Concentration, SD = Standard Deviation, CL = Confidence Limits,

CV = Coefficient of Variation

Page 35: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200922 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 2

Report By: Reviewed By:

Marcus Lee-Fraizer, B.Sc. Edmund Canaria, R.P. Bio.

Laboratory Biologist Senior Analyst

This report has been prepared by Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. based on data and/or samples

provided by our client and the results of this study are for their sole benefit. Any reliance on the data by

a third party is at the sole and exclusive risk of that party. The results presented here relate only to the

samples tested.

Page 36: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX A – Summary of test conditions

Page 37: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Table 1. Summary of test conditions: 48-h Daphnia magna LC50 test.

Test species Daphnia magna

Organism source In-house culture

Organism age <24-hour old neonates

Test type Static

Test duration 48 hours

Test vessel 250-mL glass beaker

Test volume 200 mL

Test solution depth 6 cm

Test concentrations Five concentrations, plus laboratory control

Test replicates 1 per treatment

Number of organisms 10 per replicate

Control/dilution water Moderately-hard reconstituted water + 2.5 µg/L Se

Test solution renewal None

Test temperature 20 ± 2°C

Feeding None

Light intensity 400 to 800 lux

Photoperiod 16 hours light / 8 hours dark

Aeration None

Test measurements

Temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH measured daily;

salinity, hardness and alkalinity measured in the undiluted

sample at test initiation; conductivity measured at test

initiation and termination; survival checked daily

Test protocol Environment Canada (2000), EPS 1/RM/14, with 2016

amendments

Statistical software CETIS Version 1.9.4

Test endpoint Survival (48-hour LC50)

Test acceptability criterion for controls Survival ≥90%

Reference toxicant Sodium chloride (NaCl)

Page 38: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX B – Toxicity test data

Page 39: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Daphnia magna Summary Sheet

Client:

Work Order No.: #{...Ju.,_,:.,'.,__ A{e&'I( Start DatefTime ~

4 "e.o {:"':k, @/¥~:(__

'c-<:>o f 'Z-~ ?q?<>-.;..~ Test Species: Oa hnia ma na

Set up by: /4.t-F- / cc ;,

Sample Information: Test Validity Criteria:

Sample ID: :::: 90% mean control survival and/or mobility and :S2

-If ZS @-Cv..J, -11/4,s/z.;,., daphnids exibit immobility and/or mortality in any

,Ill "'7 /'f/z.o -u,, r single control replicate. Sample Date:

Date Received:

Sample Volume:

tf1J,, z,:, /-z., 2z WQ Ranges:

7 Z..Jt! / L T (°C) = 20 ± 2; DO (mg/L) = 3.6 to 9.4; pH = 6 to 8.5

Test Organism Information:

Broodstock No.: o S-of, 7.Diif: -t B Age of young (Day 0): <24 h

Avg No. young per brood in previous 7 d: { Mortality(%) in previous 7 d: 0

Days to first brood:

NaCl Reference Toxicant Results:

Reference Toxicant ID: /),.,_ pc.5"'0 Stock Solution ID: -z..,o N A-02

Date Initiated: _AY,..__ o 6 /-u,"'7.a 48-h LCSO (95% Cl): r.0y. - '-· "l) g/LNaCL

Reference Toxicant Mean and Historical Range: i. Z ( <,t. J - 'i;,z..} g/L NaCL

Reference Toxicant CV(%): ____ ,::./L-~· ________ _

Test Results: ~ ~.,g d. Cc.so ?IS -<At'f;,_,-4.,.,t ~ 4L :::.. 4a ~ &tv-1

Reviewed by: ~ Date reviewed: ~ -;,4 r ~

Version 1.5; Issued Sep. 30, 2015 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc.

Page 40: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Freshwater Acute

Client:

Sample ID:

Work Order No.:

48 Hour Toxicity Test Data Sheet

/4.a,.../u., ~ ef;,f. /;1/1/ /4,,-,o"'"---Z-~ Start Date!Time: ~3/ 1c>/=a. eJtYi{ £f Z8r;;-&w;,J, - 1£/o•;;/-z.p7,,:, CER#: __ <----------

1,oo q c. 'L ~ No. Organisms/volume: ---'1"'0"/2,_,0-=0"-m"'L'--------Test Organism: _,D'-'.m=a""gnccac....,. _______ _

Set up by: ~ /C c5

Thermometer: c.f.l!.< pH meter/probe: ~_!;;;_ DO meter/probe: __f_;___i2_ Cond./Salinity ~eter/probe: ___f?_1_f,_

Concentration Number of No.

Live Organisms Immobilized

%(vlv) Rep

24 48 48

/ ·--.-i,,,, I A /,D {D D

B

C

D

?.·z~ A IQ ID p

B

C

D

11.,.E A tO /0 D

B

C

D

-z_,'5"' A to /O 0

B

C

D

<;'O A ,~ /0 D

B

C

D

,1,...0 A i,o /o 0

B

C

D

Technician Initials /ffi,/,{ \\...\,'.}·~ \\\v...__

Hardness* Alkalinitv*

Concentration *(me/Las CaCo31

Control (MH\M '16 ...,_/

HiAhest cone. S?o ~z... ~ r"'I

Hardness adiusted

Comments:

Temperature Dissolved oxygen pH Conductivity

0

.. ~·.,.z::,

ifi.-c-

lt/.0

;q.o

lti,o

it/,O

ITT{

('C) (mg/L) (µSiem)

24 48 0 24 48 0 24 48 0 48

1a.r l'iP &.-4 '?,,'5' JA, q.1. 'il."J f-1 s'i""i .~s-i.-

/f.-', l"iP <i.'?, <bz.. J-, i/ g~ .v 'i( .0 J:.. <> az_g I tr,"'

11-" (qP t-:+ <LI C. ; :~'I R.c J.._ D '.>c<> -,::,<

lfi:, /t;p g.1- IJ..l, J-,'j) 7--~ 'J,'l I-" 61,,3 /"(, I

·;;.,; i"l, ,0 'l..'-f L 1 b :l I '7'. "'.l.. ,,'\ ~9 q,~ q·i,D

/ti-'> /'/? 7-,3 I-.;. 1o S',5 17.$' 7. l, i.s- I/be-I /~oJr

duf \\_<_"'- r,;:;;-,.,- ,111.1-r,, ,,\»..._ lh1,u:-- t'l,M,f 'v,..'·' ,//~./ 1,;,,,_~

mmai ustmem ustea

Temp ('Cl /'i.o /

DO (moil) -;7. ~ V

pH '1--"> /

Cond fuS/cm I(., of ./

Sa!initv (""n b, e £

~rr Mortality: Heartbeat checked under microscope r"1 'cL

Sample Description: -/&,bld ~ ~ ' J '= ~?• rd 1 '21,.f'J < 7 0 d,.,,,,__, < -

I f&i..,. ~:k'.44:1'., \

" ~a Batch#: f\ ')Cb ·ti;, A-tK 7--d previous # young/brood: { -::J: Previous 7~d Mortality{%): 0 Day of 1st Brood.: __ ..,!,_ __

Reviewed by: ~ Date reviewed: rtYu.1 :;,4 r d1J,;,o

Version 1.9; Issued July 19, 2017 Naumus Environmental Company lnc.

·-

Page 41: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX C – Chain-of-custody form

Page 42: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

G ~~H!!~N~~ Report to:

Company

Address

City/State/Zip

Contact

Phone

Email

Sample CoHl!~~!~-~ By: ~'..l..

SAMPLE ID

11#280 - GRAS -19/05/2020

Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

PO Box 2609, l0~Q Coquiwaldi Rd.

Mackenzie, BC, V0J 2CO

Randee_e. Sandhu

250-997-2444

MPMC-Environment@mackenziepu!p.com

M PMC-T echn [email protected] m

KV

DATE TIME MATRIX

19-May-20 8:20 water

TESTING LOCATION (Please Circle}

Burnaby 8664

Commerce Court Burnaby, British

Columbia, Canada VSA 4N7

Phone 604.420.8773

lnvoice To:

Company

Address

Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

PO Box 2609, 1000 Co.9.uiwaldi Rd.

City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, V0J 2C0

Kim Hornett

250-997-2473

Contact

Phone

Email

PO No.

[email protected]

43011427

Sample Type: Grab X OR

# OF CONTAINERS AND

VOLUME (e.g. 1 x 20 L)

2 x 1 L

Composite 0

COMMENTS

2..00 qzz

Chain of Custody

Date ___ Page_of.

ANALYSES REQUIRED

I E e

a = = m

( ~ .9, cr, K .s a

m

! C .9, 0 © ~ ~ 0,

'.:J u C

l a ·a m 0 m © f C ~ C ~ 0, u cr, u m ~ m a w

E I- E I- J!l ci "' ci "' m

"' "' 0 .c .c .c .c ~

$ "' $ "' ~

O'> O'> "' .·

X X K,9

21-------1----+--+---+-------+----------+-t-+-t-+--+-l-+-+-t--t--

:1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --

51--------1-----+---+---+-------+-----------+--t--t--ir--t--i---i--i---i--t--;--c--

:1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --

-8 I I I I

' . -9 I I J I

10 I I 7 7 .· . I · -- -- - -- - I ' SAMPLERECEll'Tl>ETAILS(u\li0.111\TORY) SAMPLE llESCRIPTIONAf:ID COMMENTS (LABOffAT(!RYf ' SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS (CUENT)

-- -

Sample confirmation reciept, mortality update and report to required:

[email protected]:

[email protected]

REUNQUISHED BY (CLIENT)

1, ·Ttital Nc;i;··:of

KVI c;..1J,S, GI Va 1Ac~a>-t.A 7''1 (Prir>t Name =-----F'"'"''"l£!!•d1:!N•,cm,i_e)_c_'--c...,---"---"---"-'-,,.-----"---"Q;,,L!!!!eL.:......:......:........:,

Y\ cte,O,Jl<Ad4> ftt.Lf- tvw 14 ).lo@_; I\ '.o /l1'i;&'"( /.. /y!t,j 2f:/13l //,7-c _Company) 'tfoate/l"ime) (~ompanyl :· · ·· · · · . '," (D~feMdTlll\_e)

Additional costs may be required for sample disposal or storage. Payment net 30 unless othenvise contracted.

Page 43: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

END OF REPORT

Page 44: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

8664 Commerce Court, Burnaby, BC V5A 4N7

Acute Toxicity Test Results

Sample #2BO – GRAB – 26/05/2020,

collected May 26, 2020

Final Report

June 10, 2020

Submitted to: Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation

Mackenzie, BC

Page 45: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200983 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 1

SAMPLE INFORMATION

Sample ID

Dates Receipt

temperature Collected Received Daphnia magna

test initiation

#2BO – GRAB –

26/05/2020

26-May-20 at

0730h

27-May-20 at

1200h

27-May-20 at

1350h 7.8oC

TEST

• Daphnia magna 48-h LC50 test

RESULTS

Toxicity test results

Sample ID LC50 (% v/v)

#2BO – GRAB – 26/05/2020 >100

LC = Lethal Concentration

QA/QC

QA/QC summary Daphnia magna

Reference toxicant LC50 (95% CL) 6.8 (5.7 – 8.1) g/L NaCl1

Reference toxicant historical mean

(2 SD range) 6.2 (4.7 – 8.3) g/L NaCl

Reference toxicant CV 14%

Organism health history Acceptable

Protocol deviations None

Water quality range deviations None

Control performance Acceptable

Test performance Valid

1 Test date: May 27, 2020, LC = Lethal Concentration, SD = Standard Deviation, CL = Confidence Limits,

CV = Coefficient of Variation

Page 46: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

WO#200983 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. 2

Report By: Reviewed By:

Marcus Lee-Fraizer, B.Sc. Andy Diewald, B. Sc.

Laboratory Biologist Senior Analyst

This report has been prepared by Nautilus Environmental Company Inc. based on data and/or samples

provided by our client and the results of this study are for their sole benefit. Any reliance on the data by

a third party is at the sole and exclusive risk of that party. The results presented here relate only to the

samples tested.

Page 47: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX A – Summary of test conditions

Page 48: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Table 1. Summary of test conditions: 48-h Daphnia magna LC50 test.

Test species Daphnia magna

Organism source In-house culture

Organism age <24-hour old neonates

Test type Static

Test duration 48 hours

Test vessel 250-mL glass beaker

Test volume 200 mL

Test solution depth 6 cm

Test concentrations Five concentrations, plus laboratory control

Test replicates 1 per treatment

Number of organisms 10 per replicate

Control/dilution water Moderately-hard reconstituted water + 2.5 µg/L Se

Test solution renewal None

Test temperature 20 ± 2°C

Feeding None

Light intensity 400 to 800 lux

Photoperiod 16 hours light / 8 hours dark

Aeration None

Test measurements

Temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH measured daily; salinity,

hardness and alkalinity measured in the undiluted sample at

test initiation; conductivity measured at test initiation and

termination; survival checked daily

Test protocol Environment Canada (2000), EPS 1/RM/14, with 2016

amendments

Statistical software CETIS Version 1.9.4

Test endpoint Survival (48-hour LC50)

Test acceptability criterion for controls Survival ≥90%

Reference toxicant Sodium chloride (NaCl)

Page 49: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX B – Toxicity test data

Page 50: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Daphnia magna Summary Sheet

Client:

Work Order No.:

M,ullfmie £ult, Mill rn rpc.wtin YI 2C09Z"-

Sample Information:

Sample ID:

Sample Date:

Date Received:

Sample Volume:

'-1\2.f:,i\- 0gp.,p, - 26/0'5/2020 Ho,lt ?0 /202£)

Hc1v 21 12020 'lX IL

Test Organism Information:

Start Datemme: Muy J.7 /20:2Q & ,3:.50 k Test Species: Daphnia magna

Set up by: ML.F / cu;

Test Validity Criteria:

~ 90% mean control survival and/or mobility and :52

daphnids exibit immobility and/or mortality in any

single control replicate.

WQRanges:

T (°C) = 20 ± 2; DO (mg/L) = 3.6 to 9.4; pH = 6 to 8.5

Broodstock No.:

Age of young (Day 0):

01v2.q2 o A~ei <24 h

Avg No. young per brood in previous 7 d: 16 Mortality(%) in previous 7 d:

Days to first brood: 2.

NaCl Reference Toxicant Results:

Reference Toxicant ID:

Stock Solution ID:

Date Initiated:

48-h LC50 (95% CL):

i)n1DC'51 '.2flNu.n'2

~'°'" ?J now . "' '" . ) /,,. ,. I '1.7- 1.. l _gjLNaCL

Reference Toxicant Mean and Historical Range: fu ·2. (4.1 -i. 3) _gjl NaCL

Reference Toxicant CV(%): ___ ,_I-'-----------

Test Results: -n,,,,.,. !4-Xhr L.t i:=.;o ~-~ ect1n111tPd tr, \-iP 1100-':/u i.vlv).

Reviewed by: Date reviewed: ~ 1/2,:::>

Version 1.5; !ssued Sep. 30, 2015 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc.

Page 51: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Freshwater Acute

48 Hour Toxicity Test Data Sheet

Client:

Sample ID:

Work Order No.:

//fM./r-_-r.,1,,_ fl.f Jt'/1 /4,,.,,,-..¢;,.._ Start Date/Time: /11_47 Zrz:'"-i,,;:,,.@ /SsoL. :ii 7,g,:, -6.....,_t, ·- U / o, S: /1,,;,.,_,.,, CER #: __ > _________ _

r . ·"7,.pe q:;,,; No. Organisms/volume: ~1~0/-=2~00~m~L~-------

Test Organism:-=O"".m=ag"-n','a-,,---,-------Set up by: /1#'i: / cc. ~

Thermometer. ('.f fi1"<:"pH meter/probe: _i_; b DO meter/probe: _!i__t~ Cond./Salinity meter/probe: _!::__}~

Concentration Number of No.

Temperature Dissolved oxygen pH Conductivity Live Organisms

Immobilized ('C) (mg/L) (µSiem)

/.,{vi'-') Rep

24 48 48 0 24 48 0 24 48 0 24 48 0 48

C.~c-£-0 I A 1o I(\ 0 io ,0 1q:n /q "i 11'; 'j;,2- i) 9,1 f.1 <11 ~J.1-"x p;,,,2 B

C

D

&, . "" A I/) 10 D iQ.O /ll.'5 q,s-,.) 1.IA II ?,

,0 ,.,

/1.:> \\'.. I '9{\ 9.1 tl.11\ n 21 B

C

D

/t s- A I '1 /(\ 6 qn ~" ., l'.l"j' O'j q7 1?,-Z. Q() "} (\ 9.1 iJ.04 1J.C11 B

C

D

;z :(' A tn 1o l"I iO n /Crn a.n '>IS I 9,2 Ii: .i 17.q l.'i 'ii.I 1;..4n (., u./

B

C

D ,,

s-a A (,'; fr,. .-, I/'} 11 1"1.0 ,o_"&c; q_ic:; g.;z 17 (I ·,:, 7,"l <,( _() 1q,'9. 0(7

B 7-1

C

D

too A j;ti, ,n i'J qo r:?0 1911,f '{11 5.n i "-'~

7. "5 7,L i1.0 )LfC/1_ I 1.)£11

B

C

D

Technician Initials rm 1,1:k IA-- ~ w /"if io,,I- r-1....-~ Ir, .-.

rt'll ,1~ I r)'A-. '"

7n7fial us ent usted

Temn /"C\ 1q.o ,

DO /mo/L\ l' .o /

Control MH lnH 7,5 .,/

Hi hest cone. Cond (uS/cm) 14q2_ /

Hardness ad·usted Salinitv loot\ C ;-1 /.

Comments: Mortality: Heartbeat checked under microscope fi; ~ Req_ owed

w

Sample Description: i:i1vr,,d, , bYGNU pu.i P'J odr,,r s~ Batch#: l:Ji./2/11,;;> i'\'t'~ 7-d previous# young/brood:

I C.l i

-Z.-0 Previous 7-d Mortality(%):

pi y t'i ( l1 \c.l,Jei

~ Day of 1st Brood:.~$~--

Reviewed by: er Date reviewed: &v-t.- YD Version 1.9; Issued July 19, 2017 Nautilus Environmental Company Inc.

Page 52: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

APPENDIX C – Chain-of-custody form

Page 53: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

11.-'1""'-' L.U"-N1•v111 \.-n::a;,"' .,.., .. ,..,,

Chain of Custody

G ~~H!!h~~ Burnaby 8664

Commerce Court Burnaby, British

Columbia, Canada VSA 4N7

Phone 604.420.8773 Date ___ Page_of

ANAL VSES REnUIRED

Report to: Invoice To:

Company Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation Company Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation I

Address PO Box 2609, 1000 Coquiwafdi Rd. Address PO Box 2609, 1000 Coquiwaldi Rd. e City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, V0J 2C0 City/State/Zip Mackenzie, BC, VOJ 2C0 :t e • ~ • = Contact Randeep Sandhu Contact Kim Harnett

ro

~ e E,

Phone 250-997-2444 Phone 250-997-2473 cr, 8. C • ·a ro ! '

Email [email protected] Email [email protected] 0 • E, v> ~ cr,

[email protected] PO No. ':l u C ~ 43011427 • ·a

ro 0 ro • s ] C v> C

~ Sample Collection By: KV Sample Type: Grab X OR Composite 0 cr, ':l

cr, C

ro ro w

.,,., •• , .•. ,.,w.,,.•,.•,· •••··•·••••·•""""•" .. ,.,",w, ,, .• , ... , ...... .. , .... , ........... --. y,•,•,:w.•.• .•. ..,.,..,., , ,v.•c.w.•,• ............ ,.....,,.,·,; ,,., ..,.,w.· ••.•. , .. , •; .. v.w .. ·.·.,· ., .... .,.,.,.,.,.•.• ... v. , • .-,, ... ,., .. • ., • .,, •. .,.,,.., .. ' ·•.w.w,·,·•U' E 1-- E 1-- l9 ci

w ci

w ro

# OF CONTAINERS AND "' "' 0

SAMPLE ID DATE TIME MATRIX COMMENTS .c .c .c .c v>

VOLUME {e.g. 1 x 20 L) J, "' J, "' v>

st m st m i2

l #280 - GRAB - 26/05/2020 26-May-20 7:30 water 2 X 1 L I IV If 2 0011 o 3 X X 28

2

3

I

.

5 .

5

7

3 .· ,

1 J

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS (CUENT) ..

SAMPLE RECEIPT DETAILS_ (t.<(BORATORY) . - .. > SAMPLE .DESCRIPTION AN.D,COMMENTS (LJ\BORATORY) .• ...

1; _TOtat_.N?·:•:0!•:::\:_::: :-:"i· .. -· I k' ~·:.: ~~,: P~~-e-~_t._ •·• @ · .. i .i . . \ ·. . . . .• . .,: ,• :.··· · ... ·· >

Sample confirmation reciept, mortality update and report to required: Containers-.-:,•.-. ·· ,.i. ln:cciorer? / ... :,•/~\<•··

[email protected]:

{~ourlor •:··•· i. · :.•• U:Of.iJ fs<,IP,eserit v1rp) _ ... :- .· :-: ·.. /.-· .... •.-.·· I:•:·:·.. .• . .-,. '· :-,.--·. c;mCooler?· .. ·--> ........ · .; .:" _:..-· . ·•· .· .

[email protected] . i·· .. . • .. •.·.• ··.·· .. ···. •,..;,.( 6,.lrif\1"5 .. _·.'.i •i> Yi~ 3 .. ~ot,_d.,C.~_11_d,l!i,~~! :.· . ..- ·~~-~-~'!.~t:~.n :".'-._:-'.:. '·· _. . \ -.,. ' ::' · ·:·.-. ··.·.: :;•:: ·. ··: . -'<·:'.:"/;/.·:.:·i• Si!al?:.:,: .:::< ,_.:;•··_-.: ,:- , _ :: .. ·•· ..

· .

. .··.• RECEIVED IIY (LABORAT<lRY) • • RELINQUISHED BY (CLIENT) . · •:·: ... ·, ' ',-: . ,."' '" .

~_/£ ··.•·.·•·•·.···~·-··••·i. \

.i·: i....... 1:1-1 ..•..... • \> p,;o,N,m,,C lc,:,re. AhtioH- le 'Jir}

.... , ;y-,..-_; (Printed Name) · - · · · : . ._:· · . ..,- -c' · "··· (Si~naturn'':•"· '" ·::·· · ·: -·

.. ··.·~[ ·.·.·.· ·.·. i ~ .

flr,I ,t. Puh> I /:Q,Q[r)J;y, )Aue; Jb ';;p,;)M' i ¥ fa ,'27/2() (!/;_ ;OD

Comnanv) · .. •.:, "_:· .. ··ioa1~::Z·Timei ·· · :.:· . .

Additional costs may be required for sample disposal or storage. Payment net 30 unless otherwise contracted.

Page 54: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

END OF REPORT

Page 55: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

Precision Accuracy BlanksDate Test Results Average % Deviation Acceptance Date Std. Value Test % Deviation Acceptance Date Test Results Acceptance

from Average Criteria Result from Standard Criteria mg/l Criteria

A) Non-Filterable Residue (TSS)

05-May-20 87.90 88.5 0.6 15.0 < 2.0 mg/l

89.05 05-May-20 -3.05

12-May-20 90.20 86.5 4.3 12-May-20 -1.85

82.80 19-May-20 -3.90

19-May-20 91.00 91.4 0.4 26-May-20 -2.60

91.80

26-May-20 66.70 61.6 8.2

56.55

*Note: extremely low concentrations represent greater deviation possibilities

B) pH

06-May-20 7.01 7.01 0.1 15.0 Not applicable for pH test.7.00

12-May-20 7.03 7.04 0.1

7.05

19-May-20 7.12 7.16 0.5

7.20

26-May-20 7.69 7.78 1.1

7.86

C) Nutrients (TESTING DONE BY ALS Environmental)

D) BOD (TESTING DONE BY ALS Environmental)

E) AOX (TESTING DONE BY ECONOTECH SERVICES LTD.)

See attached Certificate of Accreditation and Final Scope of Testing

documentation for Econotech Services Ltd & ALS Environmental issued

by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA).

Subsequent submissions will refer to this documentation.

See also last PT test done by Mackenzie Pulp Mill.

May 2020

Quality Assurance Data

Page 56: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

SAMPLE ANALYTE UNITS ASSIGNED REPORTED S Z SCORE

STUDY DATE:

LABORATORY NAME:

March 2020 Study

Mackenzie Pulp Mill - Internal Compliance Lab

METHOD

DATE: PAGE:PROFICIENCY TESTING CANADA TESTING REPORT

3033

CODE

PARTICIPANT NO.:

MATRIX: Water (Inorganic)

APP

June 19, 2020

SCORE BIAS SUMMARYN ±U

3

SolidsTEST GROUP:

C04A-1 Total Suspended Solids mg/L 10 10 2GRAVIMETRIC 0033246 187 .1

C04A-2 Total Suspended Solids mg/L 46 45 5GRAVIMETRIC -.2033246 183 .4

C04A-3 Total Suspended Solids mg/L 95 84 10GRAVIMETRIC -1.1033246 186 .9

C04A-4 Total Suspended Solids mg/L 200 184 20GRAVIMETRIC Acceptable-.8033246 186 2 92

C04A-1 Volatile Suspended Solids mg/L 8.9 9.6 1.3GRAVIMETRIC .538050850 57 .2

C04A-2 Volatile Suspended Solids mg/L 34.9 35.2 4.4GRAVIMETRIC .068050850 59 .7

C04A-3 Volatile Suspended Solids mg/L 78.5 72.4 9.8GRAVIMETRIC -.622050850 59 2

C04A-4 Volatile Suspended Solids mg/L 162 158.1 20.2GRAVIMETRIC Acceptable-.193050850 58 3 95

BOD/CBODTEST GROUP:

C04B-1 BOD (5 day) mg/L 48 45 6D.O. METER -.5033247 103 .8

C04B-2 BOD (5 day) mg/L 83 82 10D.O. METER -.1033247 104 1

C04B-3 BOD (5 day) mg/L 167 130 23D.O. METER -1.609033247 105 3

C04B-4 BOD (5 day) mg/L 220 167 32D.O. METER Acceptable-1.656033247 104 4 86

CODTEST GROUP:

C04D-1 COD mg/L 76 80 5COLORIMETRIC .8044972 94 .7

C04D-2 COD mg/L 116 127 7COLORIMETRIC 1.571044972 96 .9

C04D-3 COD mg/L 309 315 13COLORIMETRIC .462044972 93 2

C04D-4 COD mg/L 485 513 18COLORIMETRIC H Acceptable1.556044972 95 2 84

pHTEST GROUP:

C15-1 pH pH units 5.1 5.1 .1pH METER 0033248 237 .008

C15-2 pH pH units 7.12 7.06 .1pH METER -.6033248 239 .008

C15-3 pH pH units 3.34 3.44 .1pH METER 1033248 238 .008

*DNS = Did Not Submit Results ± U = uncertainty of the Assigned Value

Page 57: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

SAMPLE ANALYTE UNITS ASSIGNED REPORTED S Z SCORE

STUDY DATE:

LABORATORY NAME:

March 2020 Study

Mackenzie Pulp Mill - Internal Compliance Lab

METHOD

DATE: PAGE:PROFICIENCY TESTING CANADA TESTING REPORT

3033

CODE

PARTICIPANT NO.:

MATRIX: Water (Inorganic)

APP

June 19, 2020

SCORE BIAS SUMMARYN ±U

4

C15-4 pH pH units 8.25 8.22 .1pH METER Acceptable-.3033248 242 .008 93

*DNS = Did Not Submit Results ± U = uncertainty of the Assigned Value

Page 58: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation

This laboratory is accredited in accordance with the recognized International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2017. This accreditation demonstrates technical competence for a defined scope and the operation of a laboratory quality management system (refer to joint ISO-ILAC-IAF Communiqué dated April 2017).

Nautilus Environmental Inc. 8664 Commerce Court Burnaby, British Columbia

Accreditation No.: A3525 Issued On: September 10, 2019 Accreditation Date: March 6, 2007 Expiry Date: March 10, 2022

This certificate is the property of the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. and must be returned on request; reproduction must follow policy in place at date of issue. For the specific tests to which this accreditation applies, please refer to the laboratory’s scope of accreditation at www.cala.ca.

President & CEO

Page 59: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation
Page 60: Water Effluent Comparison To Regulation