website accessibility: it’s the right thing to do
TRANSCRIPT
Website Accessibility It’s the Right Thing to do
Thursday, November 17thphp[world] 2016
Stephen Pashby @DH_Stephen
David Minton @DH_David@DesignHammer
Overview
• Introduction
• What is accessibility
• Federal regulations
• Disabilities
• Automated accessibility testing
• Court cases
2
Stephen PashbyAccount Manager
5
David Minton
Managing Partner@DH_David
Over twenty years industry experience
Disclaimer
We are not lawyers
• Don’t take any of this as legal advice
We won’t tell you how to fix your website
• But we will point you in the right direction
7
What we won’t cover
• Legal responsibilities regarding accessibility
• How to make a website accessible
10
What is accessibility?
“Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web. More specifically, Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can perceive, understand, navigate, and interact with the Web, and that they can contribute to the Web.”
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
17
Why accessibility?
“The web is not a barrier to people with disabilities, it is the solution. The web has the potential to revolutionize the day-to-day lives of millions of people with disabilities by increasing their ability to independently access information…and other aspects of life that most people take for granted.”
Center for Persons with Disabilities
19
Why accessibility?
• Help others: it is the right thing to do
• Help ourselves: we are all getting older
• Attracts new/retains existing customers
• Generally leads to improved usability for all
• It’s the law (does it apply to you?)
20
Disabilities in detail
Vision
• ~8.1 million people have difficulty seeing
• Including ~2.0 million who are blind
Hearing
• ~7.6 million experience difficulty hearing
• including ~1.1 million with severe difficulty
21
What is Section 508?
• Amendment to Rehabilitation Act of 1973
• Approved 1998
• Compliance by 2001
• Notice of proposed rule-making announced February 2015
• New rule currently expected no earlier than April 2016
36
Current status of 508
• Proposed Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines
• Would incorporate Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0
• Currently under review
• When and how will it be authorized ???
37
Section 508 Standards
• Only 16 paragraphs specific to websites
• Has not been updated in years
• Some refer to obsolete techniques
• Some very specific, some vague
• Many open to interpretation
38
Section 508 Resources
• Section 508 Standards Guide(http://www.section508.gov/section-508-standards-guide)
• About the ICT Refresh (http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict-refresh)
39
What is Title II?
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
• “No qualified individual with a disability shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity (e.g. any department, agency, or other instrumentality of a State or States or local government).”
40
What is Title III?
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
• “No individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation.”
41
What is WCAG 2.0?
• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
• Developed by Web Accessibility Initiative
• Part of World Wide Web Consortium
• Published in 2008
• Basis for many nation’s accessibility laws
42
WCAG 2.0
• Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (http://www.w3.org/WAI/)
• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/)
• How to Meet WCAG 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/)
43
Current status WCAG
• Currently a guideline
• Success based
• Does not require specific techniques
• Provides numerous scenarios with acceptable solutions
44
1. Perceivable
• Provide text alternatives for non-text content.
• Provide captions & other alts. for multimedia.
• Create content that can be presented in different ways, including by assistive technologies, without losing meaning.
• Make it easier for users to see and hear content.
46
2. Operable
• Make all functionality available from keyboard.
• Give users enough time to read & use content.
• Do not use content that causes seizures.
• Help users navigate and find content.
47
3. Understandable
• Make text readable and understandable.
• Make content appear and operate in predictable ways.
• Help users avoid and correct mistakes.
48
4. Robust
• Maximize compatibility with current and future user tools.
49
Automated testing
“Accessibility testers are like spelling and grammar checkers, for your website. If you are a competent writer they can help you find errors and make improvements. If you run one on foreign language text, you’ll clear all of the errors, but will likely wind up with gibberish.”
David Minton DesignHammer
51
Testing expectations
• Pass
• Conditional Pass (manual check)
• Fail
• False positives and negatives
53
Section 508 § 1194.22 (a)
“A text equivalent for every non-text element shall be provided (e.g., via "alt", "longdesc", or in element content).”
Web-based intranet & internet information & applications. Section 508 Standards Guide
54
WCAG 2.0 1.1.1
“All non-text content that is presented to the user has a text alternative that serves the equivalent purpose, except for the situations listed below. (Level A)”
How to Meet WCAG 2.0 Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group
55
WCAG 2.0 1.1.1
A. If a short description can serve the same purpose and present the same information as the non-text content.
B. If a short description can not serve the same purpose and present the same information as the non-text content (e.g., a chart or diagram):
56
WCAG 2.0 1.1.1
C. If non-text content is a control or accepts user input:
D. If non-text content is time-based media (including live video-only and live audio-only); a test or exercise that would be invalid if presented in text; or primarily intended to create a specific sensory experience:
57
WCAG 2.0 1.1.1
E. If non-text content is a CAPTCHA:
F. If the non-text content should be ignored by assistive technology:
58
Adequate image alt text?
• <img src="img/stop.png" alt="Stop">
• Tester: Conditional Pass
• Compliance: Pass
65
Adequate image alt text?
• <img src="img/stop.png" alt="placeholder">
• Tester: Conditional Pass
• Compliance: Fail F30
67
Adequate image alt text?
• <img src="img/stop.png" alt="Go">
• Tester: Conditional Pass
• Compliance: Fail F20
69
71
• <img src="img/curl.png" alt="curl">
• Tester: Conditional Pass
• Compliance: Fail F39
Adequate image alt text?
75
• <img src="img/curl.png" alt="">
• Tester: Conditional Pass/Fail?
• Compliance: Pass
Adequate image alt text?
Samples
• SaaS hosted: Cynthia Sayshttp://www.cynthiasays.com
• Browser plug-in: WAVE for Firefox/Chrome (http://wave.webaim.org)
• Desktop application: TotalValidator(https://www.totalvalidator.com)
78
Cynthia Says
Pros
• Provides feedback by requirement (e.g. Section 508 statute)
• Can test Section 508, WACG 2.0 A, WACG 2.0 AA, and WACG 2.0 AAA compliance
80
WAVE plugin
Pros
• Free
• Displays webpage with embedded icons
• Can test password protected websites
83
WAVE plugin
Cons
• Tests one page a time
• Tests based on both Section 508 and WACG, can’t test for full 508 or WACG compliance
84
TotalValidator
Pros
• Free basic version
• Provides line-by-line analysis of code
• Can test Section 508, WACG 2.0 A, WACG 2.0 AA, and WACG 2.0 AAA compliance
• Can crawl multiple pages on a site
86
Which one for me?
• Do I need to test password protected site?
• Do I need to test more than one page?
• Do I need to test code, or only content?
• Do I need to maintain compliance or build a new site/fix an existing site?
88
WAVE extension
• Summary and list of errors
• Error popup and code viewer
• Documentation of individual errors
• Outline view
• No style sheet view
• Contrast check, and desaturated view
90
Enforcement options
• Legislative action
• Justice Department settlement agreements
• Court cases
103
Federal legislation
• Federal agency websites covered by amendment to Rehabilitation Act 1973
• Most airline websites covered by amendment to Air Carrier Access Act 1986
104
Federal Agencies
U. S. General Services Administration
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973
• Approved 1998
• Compliance by 2001
• Section 508 § 1194
105
Airline Industry
Department of Transportation
• Amendment to Air Carrier Access Act 1986
• Approved November 2013
• Compliance by December 2015
• WCAG 2.0 Levels A and AA
106
DOJ agreements
• Ahold USA Inc and Peapod LLC
• National Museum of Crime & Punishment
107
Ahold USA, Inc.
• website: http://www.peapod.com
• Online grocery services
• For-profit, online only
• November 2014
• Penalties: $0 Must conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA
108
National Museum of Crime and Punishment
• website: http://www.crimemuseum.org
• Museum
• For-profit, physical place & online
• January 2015
• Penalties: $0 Must conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA
109
Court cases
• National Federation of the Blind and Heidi Veins v. Scribd
• Melissa J Earll v. eBay
• Donald Cullen v. Netflix
• National Association of the Deaf v. Netflix
• US v. Miami University
110
National Fed. of the Blind v. Scribd
• For-profit, online only
• Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act
• October 2015: US District Court for the District of Vermont denies motion to dismiss
• October 2016: Parties settle
• Penalties: $0 (must conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA
111
Earll v. eBay
• For-profit, online only
• Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act
• April 2015: US Ninth Circuit “Because eBay’s services are not connected to any ‘actual, physical place,’ eBay is not subject to the ADA.”
• Penalties: $0 (dismissal upheld)
112
Cullen v. Netflix
• For-profit, online only
• Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act
• April 2015: US Ninth Circuit “Because Netflix’s services are not connected to any ‘actual, physical place,’ Netflix is not subject to the ADA.”
• Penalties: $0 (dismissal upheld)
113
National Assoc. of the Deaf v. Netflix
• For-profit, online only
• Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act
• Oct. 2012: US District Court for Massachusetts rules that the ADA applies to web-only businesses
• Penalties: ~$800,000
114
Dudley v. Miami University
• Public University, physical and online
• Title II of Americans with Disabilities Act
• January 2016: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, parties settle
• Penalties: In progress
115
Dudley v. Miami University
“Education is said to be the great equalizer of American society, and educational technologies hold great promise to make this a reality. However, students with disabilities continue to encounter an impenetrable glass ceiling of opportunity when schools fail to comply with the ADA.”
Vanita Gupta Principal Deputy Asst. Attorney General
Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice
116
Courts split on rulings
• Are web-only businesses places of “public accommodation” under Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act?
• Is the website a “public accommodation” only as an extension of businesses with actual, physical places?
• Does Title III even apply to websites at all?
117
Schedule for regulations
• Expect Title II regulations in 2017
• Expect Title III regulations in 2018
118
What does the future hold?
• Continue as planned? Probably?
• Limit further regulations? Possibly?
• Dismantle ADA or DOJ CRD? Unlikely?
• Accelerate regulations? Hmmmm?
122
Why we need regulations
• Current situation provides uncertainty (Business hates uncertainty)
• Wave of “nuisance” suits is increasing
• Regulations could/would curtail lawsuits
123
Rule on Accessibility of Airline Web Sites
“U.S. and foreign air carriers that operate at least one aircraft having a seating capacity of more than 60 passengers, and own or control a primary Web site that markets air transportation to consumers in the United States … must make their web pages providing core travel information and services accessible to persons with disabilities.”
14 CFR Part 382 US Department of Transportation
124
Airline regulations a model?
• Tiered system based on size or industry?
• Reduced requirements for small business?
• Excuse small business entirely?
• Consider factors such as annual revenue?
125
Conclusion
• No silver bullet to make sites accessible
• Accessibility is a never-ending process
• The legal landscape is in flux; look for new rulings, and regulations in 2017–18!
127
Resources
• https://designhammer.com/blog/website-accessibility-its-not-just-good-idea-its-law or
• http://bit.ly/dhaccess
128
130
Follow us! @DesignHammer facebook.com/DesignHammer
www.designhammer.com/blog
Feedback: https://legacy.joind.in/18718