what i learned at nti - atrium medical corporation

2
This year, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) held the annual National Teaching Institute (NTI) in Boston, just one month after the bombings at the marathon. Being from Connecticut, it was great to be in my own backyard. Chest Tube Dressings The first thing I learned is that we finally have research exam- ining outcomes in thoracic surgery patients with dry, sterile chest tube dressings. Nurse researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital examined records of all thoracic surgery patients who had chest tubes from 2005 to 2010 (n=4361) and a subset of 321 lung cancer patients who had lobectomy between January 2009 and December 2010. The thoracic surgery service stopped using petroleum gauze a decade ago. Overall, there was a 3.1% incidence of air leak, with 8% in the cancer group. Wound infection rate was 0.48% in all patients and 0.3% in the cancer group. Neither air leaks nor wound infec- tions were attributable to dressing materials. The researchers use and recommend a simple dry occlusive gauze dressing. 1 We’ll be sure to let you know when this study is published. Evidence-Based Practice Makes Dollars and Sense Two sessions on evidence-based practice provided case studies on procedure changes driven by research reviews. 2,3 One examined the frequency of temperature checks in PACU patients using a Bair Hugger. The PACU policy of 1 hour was supported even though the manufacturer recommendation was every 10 minutes (which was clearly impractical.) Another exam- ined the relationship between bathing PICU patients and hospital acquired infections. 3 A review of the literature together with a survey of hospitals that had reduced CLABSI to zero iden- tified daily CHG (chlorhexidine gluconate) baths as the key variable. Implementing daily bathing with CHG wipes took the CLABSI rate in this hospital from above benchmark to zero. Another speaker illustrated the difference between quality improvement and evidence-based practice by describing a proj- ect about postop respiratory care. 2 Staff noticed all patients had incentive spirometers, but wondered if they were being used and if they made any difference in postop recovery. The quality improvement question is, “Are patients coughing and deep breathing?” The evidence-based practice question is, “Is there a difference between incentive spirometry and nurse-directed deep breathing on postoperative respiratory outcomes?” The project is now moving forward examining how to optimize out- comes while conserving nursing time and costs. In addressing what nurses should keep and what we should throw away, 3 speakers compared nurses who insist on hanging on to "the way we've always done [it]" to hoarders. Hoarding is related to stress. Often, these nurses are in unhealthy work envi- ronments, dealing with staffing issues and compassion fatigue, and bombarded with more information than they can process; a much more nuanced view than simply labeling them “resistant to change.” Bringing Financial Management to the Bedside Overflow attendance at two sessions on economics for bed- side caregivers showed how relevant these issues are to our practice today. One session discussed AACN’s initiative “Clinical Scene Investigation,” designed to leverage the staff nurse's expertise to enhance patient care and decrease hospital expenses. 4 Speakers emphasized how important it is to invite hospital executives to clinical units so they can see what nurses actually do. Nurses should also know the organization’s strate- gic plan so they can align proposals to improve patient care with that plan. In presenting a change, specify “if you spend X, you’ll see Y in return” or “you’ll save X for every dollar invested.” Here’s a quick way to apply this approach to analyze the potential financial benefit of the CLABSI intervention described earlier. AHRQ’s quality initiative on eliminating CLABSI reports average cost $70,696 with a range of $40,412 to $100,980. 5 CHG wipe list price is $8.95 (Amazon.com). Assuming an 8 bed unit with 80% occupancy, you’ll need 2336 wipes for daily use for a year (8 beds x 365 days x 0.8). The wipes will cost $20,907 at list price. If only one CLABSI at the lowest cost is prevented, you will be able to say to administration, “If you invest $20,907, you will see $40,412 in return” or “We will save $1.93 for each dollar invested.” While a full analysis includes more factors, what administrator would argue with that kind of savings? Lori Ewoldt, of the Mayo Clinic, packed a day’s worth of infor- mation into a session on healthcare finance. 6 Key is to follow Medicare reimbursement and coverage changes because all other payers will follow suit. She discussed reimbursement, patient satisfaction, value-based purchasing, readmissions, and the Affordable Care Act. See On the Web for links to her valu- able resources. The Power of a Nursing Team The last session was presented by nurses, a social worker and a physician who cared for the bombing victims at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. 7 I was never more proud to be a nurse than I was listening to them talk about their experiences. The room filled with laughter and tears as they talked about the care of one patient in particular – J.C. – who was next to the second bomb when it went off. He did not lose a limb, but had significant hear- ing loss and serious burns made worse by the nails, wood, and BBs that were embedded in the burned tissue from the force of the blast. We followed his care from the ED to critical care and then intermediate care. The nurses and social workers talked about their challenges caring for people from a mass casualty event; managing family members, law enforcement, and visits from dignitaries while trying to protect everyone’s privacy – What I Learned at NTI Clinical Update is edited by Patricia Carroll, MS, RN-BC, CEN, RRT, and supported by an educational grant from Atrium Medical Corporation. Summer 2013 Continued on page 2

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What I Learned at NTI - Atrium Medical Corporation

This year, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses(AACN) held the annual National Teaching Institute (NTI) inBoston, just one month after the bombings at the marathon.Being from Connecticut, it was great to be in my own backyard.

Chest Tube DressingsThe first thing I learned is that we finally have research exam-

ining outcomes in thoracic surgery patients with dry, sterile chesttube dressings. Nurse researchers at Massachusetts GeneralHospital examined records of all thoracic surgery patients whohad chest tubes from 2005 to 2010 (n=4361) and a subset of321 lung cancer patients who had lobectomy between January2009 and December 2010. The thoracic surgery servicestopped using petroleum gauze a decade ago.Overall, there was a 3.1% incidence of air leak, with 8% in the

cancer group. Wound infection rate was 0.48% in all patientsand 0.3% in the cancer group. Neither air leaks nor wound infec-tions were attributable to dressing materials. The researchersuse and recommend a simple dry occlusive gauze dressing.1We’ll be sure to let you know when this study is published.

Evidence-Based Practice Makes Dollars and SenseTwo sessions on evidence-based practice provided case

studies on procedure changes driven by research reviews.2,3One examined the frequency of temperature checks in PACUpatients using a Bair Hugger. The PACU policy of 1 hour wassupported even though the manufacturer recommendation wasevery 10 minutes (which was clearly impractical.) Another exam-ined the relationship between bathing PICU patients andhospital acquired infections.3 A review of the literature togetherwith a survey of hospitals that had reduced CLABSI to zero iden-tified daily CHG (chlorhexidine gluconate) baths as the keyvariable. Implementing daily bathing with CHG wipes took theCLABSI rate in this hospital from above benchmark to zero. Another speaker illustrated the difference between quality

improvement and evidence-based practice by describing a proj-ect about postop respiratory care.2 Staff noticed all patients hadincentive spirometers, but wondered if they were being usedand if they made any difference in postop recovery. The qualityimprovement question is, “Are patients coughing and deepbreathing?” The evidence-based practice question is, “Is there adifference between incentive spirometry and nurse-directeddeep breathing on postoperative respiratory outcomes?” Theproject is now moving forward examining how to optimize out-comes while conserving nursing time and costs.In addressing what nurses should keep and what we should

throw away,3 speakers compared nurses who insist on hangingon to "the way we've always done [it]" to hoarders. Hoarding isrelated to stress. Often, these nurses are in unhealthy work envi-ronments, dealing with staffing issues and compassion fatigue,

and bombarded with more information than they can process; amuch more nuanced view than simply labeling them “resistantto change.”

Bringing Financial Management to the BedsideOverflow attendance at two sessions on economics for bed-

side caregivers showed how relevant these issues are to ourpractice today. One session discussed AACN’s initiative “ClinicalScene Investigation,” designed to leverage the staff nurse'sexpertise to enhance patient care and decrease hospitalexpenses.4 Speakers emphasized how important it is to invitehospital executives to clinical units so they can see what nursesactually do. Nurses should also know the organization’s strate-gic plan so they can align proposals to improve patient care withthat plan. In presenting a change, specify “if you spend X, you’llsee Y in return” or “you’ll save X for every dollar invested.”Here’s a quick way to apply this approach to analyze the

potential financial benefit of the CLABSI intervention describedearlier. AHRQ’s quality initiative on eliminating CLABSI reportsaverage cost $70,696 with a range of $40,412 to $100,980.5CHG wipe list price is $8.95 (Amazon.com). Assuming an 8 bedunit with 80% occupancy, you’ll need 2336 wipes for daily usefor a year (8 beds x 365 days x 0.8). The wipes will cost $20,907at list price. If only one CLABSI at the lowest cost is prevented,you will be able to say to administration, “If you invest $20,907,you will see $40,412 in return” or “We will save $1.93 for eachdollar invested.” While a full analysis includes more factors, whatadministrator would argue with that kind of savings?Lori Ewoldt, of the Mayo Clinic, packed a day’s worth of infor-

mation into a session on healthcare finance.6 Key is to followMedicare reimbursement and coverage changes because allother payers will follow suit. She discussed reimbursement,patient satisfaction, value-based purchasing, readmissions, andthe Affordable Care Act. See On the Web for links to her valu-able resources.

The Power of a Nursing TeamThe last session was presented by nurses, a social worker anda physician who cared for the bombing victims at Brigham andWomen’s Hospital.7 I was never more proud to be a nurse thanI was listening to them talk about their experiences. The roomfilled with laughter and tears as they talked about the care of onepatient in particular – J.C. – who was next to the second bombwhen it went off. He did not lose a limb, but had significant hear-ing loss and serious burns made worse by the nails, wood, andBBs that were embedded in the burned tissue from the force ofthe blast. We followed his care from the ED to critical care andthen intermediate care. The nurses and social workers talkedabout their challenges caring for people from a mass casualtyevent; managing family members, law enforcement, and visitsfrom dignitaries while trying to protect everyone’s privacy –

What I Learned at NTI

Clinical Update is edited by Patricia Carroll, MS, RN-BC, CEN, RRT, andsupported by an educational grant from Atrium Medical Corporation.

Summer 2013

Continued on page 2

Page 2: What I Learned at NTI - Atrium Medical Corporation

In the LiteratureA Data LegacyThe current issue of Nursing Economic$ features the last article

by the late Donna Diers, a pioneer in data-driven decision making innursing, who died in February. The article, written with Yale col-leagues, describes their approach to understanding how nursingunits work by examining nursing data and combining it with a theo-ry of organizational diagnosis. The theory states that in order to existand be productive, groups must manage boundaries between them-selves and whatever is outside. An “overbounded” unit, for example,is the military, in which the group must be cohesive with rigid rulesbecause the outside is so hostile. An “underbounded” unit, on theother hand, is a rudderless ship with no direction at the mercy of out-side forces. A detailed case study describes the analysis of atroubled unit and how the combination of objective and empiricaldata, nurses’ lived experiences, and applied theory not only identi-fied key problems, but also provided the roadmap to solving them. Source: Diers D et al: Understanding Nursing Units with Data and Theory. NursingEconomic$ 2013;31(3):110-117. And see: Birmingham SE, et al: A Legacy of DataUse by Donna Diers. Nursing Economic$ 2013;31(3):144, 145, 154.

An Appetite for Comprehensive NutritionManagementThis month, the Alliance to Advance Patient Nutrition

(www.malnutrition.com) released a call to action with publication ofan interdisciplinary nutrition care model simultaneously published inMEDSURG Nursing and two nutrition journals. Based on six keyprinciples, this comprehensive article provides nutrition care recom-mendations for key stakeholders (dietician, nurse, physician,hospital administrator) organized by principle; validated screeningtools; and practices to support nutrition interventions. Principles are:create an institutional culture, redefine clinician roles, recognize anddiagnose all at-risk patients, rapidly implement interventions withcontinued monitoring; communicate nutrition care plans; and devel-op discharge nutrition care and education plans. Thiscomprehensive model pulls the research together and providespractical implementation plans. The Web site has even moreresources to put these recommendations into action.Source: Tappenden KA, et al: Critical role of nutrition in improving quality of care:an interdisciplinary call to action to address adult hospital malnutrition. MED-SURG Nursing 2013 22(3):147-165.

Here are resources from the 2013 NTIVisit Atrium University (http:www.atriumu.com) and go to theEvidence Center to download the slides and references fromthe booth presentation Evidence-Based Care of Patients withChest Tubes.The AACN Clinical Scene Investigator Academy is online athttp://tinyurl.com/nkx65k6. You can download informationfrom the first cohort of projects there.

From the financial sessions:

Direct costs associated with healthcare-associated infectionsfrom CDC: http://cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/hai/scott_costpaper.pdf

Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us, from Time magazine:http://healthland.time.com/why-medical-bills-are-killing-us/

Hospital Safety Scores: http://www.hospitalsafetyscore.org/

Commonwealth Fund Quality Improvement Resources forHealth Care Professionals:http://www.whynotthebest.org/

Medicare Discloses Hospitals’ Bonuses, Penalties Based onQuality: Article: http://tinyurl.com/buu5f9v Database:http://tinyurl.com/pekzc3k

These are resources from the Centers for Medicare andMedicaid Services; there is a wealth of open source datayou can review to see where your organization scores and toassess against benchmark for a range of indicators

Hospital Quality Initiatives:http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/index.html

Hospital Readmission Reduction Datahttp://tinyurl.com/pfap9n5

Spending per Hospital Patient with Medicarehttp://tinyurl.com/ouz3jxz

Medicare Provider Charge Data http://tinyurl.com/blv4cwg l

Medicare Hospital Total Performance Scores:http://www.medicare.gov/HospitalCompare/Data/VBP/total-performance-scores.aspx

Summer 2013

including suspects. J.C.’s dressing change-related pain was par-ticularly difficult for his nurses to handle. At the end of the session,we were introduced to another key member of the team – J.C.himself. He walked up on the stage to a standing ovation from aroom filled with experienced critical care nurses who almost allhad tears rolling down their cheeks. The stories were so vivid; weall could imagine ourselves in his nurses’ shoes. Seeing him walkup on stage unassisted was a triumph we all shared. He said henever much thought about nurses because he’d never neededone before. But he promised he will be our advocate for the restof his life. What a message to cap off an inspiring, informative,and moving week.Sources1. Jeffries M, C Gryglik, D Davies, S Knoll: Chest tube dressings: outcomes of takingpetroleum-based dressings out of the equation on air leak and infection rates. Poster pres-entation; National Teaching Institute Boston, MA: American Association of Critical-CareNurses; 2013.2. Brock A, E Twiss, H Miley, K Whiteman: Oh the Things You Can Do that Are Good:Helping Staff Nurses Overcome the Barriers of EBP. National Teaching Institute Boston,MA: American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; 2013.

3. Mize C, L Riggs, M Peterson, W Donnelly: Nursing Practice: Knowing What to Keepand What to Throw Away. National Teaching Institute Boston, MA: American Associationof Critical-Care Nurses; 2013.4. Lacey S, C Goodyear-Bruch: Show Me the Money: Practical Ways to Translate theEconomic Impact of Nursing Care. National Teaching Institute Boston, MA: AmericanAssociation of Critical-Care Nurses; 2013.5. Eliminating CLABSI, A National Patient Safety Imperative: A Companion Guide to theNational On the CUSP: Stop BSI Project Final Report. AHRQ Publication No: 12-0087-EF, October 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/clabsi-final-companion/index.html6. Ewoldt LL: What Every Nurse Should Know About Health Care Finance and Reform.National Teaching Institute Boston, MA: American Association of Critical-Care Nurses;2013.7. Brigham and Women's Hospital Staff: True Collaboration: A Critical Care Team'sResponse to the Boston Marathon Tragedy. National Teaching Institute Boston, MA:American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; 2013.

Continued from page 1