what the supreme court’s 2017-2018 term means for employers · • california supreme ct. adopted...
TRANSCRIPT
What the Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 Term
Means For Employers
David B. Weisenfeld, J.D. Anthony J. Oncidi, Esq.
XpertHR Legal Editor Proskauer Rose LLP
Former US Supreme Ct. Correspondent Heads Labor and Employment
New Providence, NJ Group in Los Angeles, CA
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
2
Justice Kennedy Calls It a Career
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
3
What will this mean for employers?
Tony, the last time we had a vacancy there was almost an entire term with an
8-member Supreme Court. Do you think it will be that drawn out this time?
• If that happens, would it limit the number of
employment cases Court agrees to hear?
Eight is Enough?
Supreme Court Goes Shorthanded
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
5
• In 2016-2017 term, almost nothing happened because Court had 4-4 split
• But with Justice Neil Gorsuch aboard for the full term this year was different
• Supreme Ct. waded into disputes affecting mandatory arbitration, unions,
whistleblowers
• Practical implications—pro-employer term
• Court majority consistently sided with businesses
Pro-Employer Term After Year “Hiatus”
• Supreme Ct. ruled 5-4 for employer upholding arbitration clause
• Appears to be big win for employers
Big takeaway from the ruling?
Epic Systems v. Lewis, May 21, 2018
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
6
Upholds
arbitration
clause
Could affect 25
million
employment
contracts
Can compel
employees
to arbitrate
individually
Class Actions Limited in Arbitration
• Case arose in context of wage and hour case, but does it go further?
• Could an employer use these arbitration clauses to guard against sexual
harassment class actions for instance? Other implications?
• Justice Ginsburg in dissent suggested majority had resurrected “yellow
dog” contracts that employees must sign as a condition of beginning
work. Thoughts?
• While decision benefits employers, it’s possible not everything will be positive
• Chicago employment attorney said on XHR podcast it could lead plaintiffs’
attorneys to file individual arbitrations claims early and more often
• Called it potentially “death by 1,000 cuts”
• Tony, do you see that as a realistic possibility? Could this be a case of “be
careful what you wish for”?
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
7
More Epic Systems v. Lewis
• Controversial Lilly Ledbetter ruling in 2007
• Court held each paycheck received did not constitute a discrete discriminatory
act, even if prior discrimination led to the pay disparity
• Led to congressional action—Lilly Ledbetter Act in 2009
• Justice Ginsburg seemed to be urging Congress to follow suit
• Depending on what happens in November election, how likely is legislative
action?
Thoughts?
Congressional Action on Horizon?
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
8
• Unions a bit in decline
• 28 states have right-to-work laws
• Supreme Ct. ruled states/public sector unions may no longer collect fees
from non-union employees who object to paying them
• Another 5-4 ruling along ideological lines
• Overturned more than 40 years of settled labor law
• Nearly happened two years ago in a similar case, but Justice Scalia’s death led
to a 4-4 tie in Friedrichs
• Scalia’s successor, Justice Gorsuch, authored the Janus opinion
Dealing a Blow to UnionsJanus v. AFSCME, June 27, 2018
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
9
• Involved claims of Illinois employee who refused to join union because he
opposed many of its positions (including those taken in collective bargaining)
• Unions had been allowed to collect dues from all employees so long as used for
collective bargaining, contract administration or grievance adjustment purposes
• This employee was required to pay monthly agency fee
• Justice Samuel Alito wrote, “Employees must choose to support the union
before anything is taken from them.”
• Otherwise would violate employees’ free speech rts.
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
10
Janus Ruling
What makes this ruling so significant?
• In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan said majority’s ruling will wreak havoc on
entrenched contractual arrangements
• Could lead to labor contracts being invalidated
• Is that too strong? How much credence do you give that?
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
11
Janus Significance
Held
• Ct. ruled unanimously that employee must provide info. about securities law
violations to the SEC in order to be protected from retaliation
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 applies to all employees who report misconduct to
the SEC, any other federal agency or an internal supervisor
• Dodd-Frank (2010) enacted in wake of Wall Street financial crisis, defines
whistleblower as a person who provides info. relating to securities law violation
What Happened
• Digital Realty VP claimed company fired him shortly after he reported suspected
securities law violations to senior management
• Never told SEC prior to his termination
• Plaintiff did NOT qualify as a whistleblower
Limiting Corporate Whistleblowers
Digital Realty Trust v. Somers
February 21, 2018
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
12
What’s the takeaway for employers from this ruling?
• Plaintiff, a former company v.p., argued that having such a limited
“whistleblower” definition would allow misconduct to go unpunished
• Also leaves professionals at risk of retaliation for complying with internal
company reporting obligations
Could this have a chilling effect on high-level employees from coming
forward in light of what happened to Somers?
More: Digital Realty v. Somers
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
13
Whistleblower
Gay Rights
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm.
June 4, 2018
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
14
• Colorado bakery owner refuses to make wedding cake for gay couple
• Said he was willing to sell “other items” to them but that making a cake for gay
wedding violated his religious beliefs
• Supreme Ct. ruled 7-2 for owner
Justice Kennedy authored opinion
who has been gay rights champion in
Obergefell v. Hodges and Windsor
Tony, how come the Court sided
with the bakery owner?
• Held—Colo. Commission was intolerant of the bakery owner’s religious beliefs
• Motive for his refusal to serve was based on sincere religious convictions
• Baker’s action occurred before Colorado recognized same-sex marriage
• Court did say gay persons shouldn’t be subj. to indignities in seeking services
Is this ruling limited to this case or does it send signals for the future?
Supreme Ct. has still yet to rule on whether Title VII protects sexual
orientation in employment realm. What would potential Justice Kavanaugh
mean?
More: Masterpiece Theater
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
15
Religious objections
were protected
expression
One commissioner
compared it to
defenses of slavery
• Another 5-4 ruling
• Broadens overtime pay exemptions to cover car dealership “service advisors”
• Should make it easier for more employers to claim OT exemptions
• Overtime always such a big issue, what’s the lesson from this ruling?
April 2, 2018
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
16
Encino Motorcars v. Navarro--FLSA
• California Supreme Ct. adopted “ABC Test” for determining independent
contractor status
• MD and DE already follow this test
• The “ABC Factors”:
1. The worker is free from control and direction of the hirer in connection with
the performance of the work;
2. Performs work outside the usual course of hiring entity’s business; and
3. Is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or
business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity
Is this the end for most IC arrangements?
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
17
Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court, April 30, 2018
Dynamex: California Supreme Ct.
• Supreme Ct.’s next term starts in October
What’s a big unresolved issue affecting employers/HR that is crying out for
review?
Will some issues thought to be “settled” be revisited?
What’s Coming Up/On Deck Circle
Fall 2018
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
18
Fire Away
Inquiring Minds Want to Know:
Questions
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
19
David B. Weisenfeld, J.D. Anthony J. Oncidi, Esq.
XpertHR Legal Editor Proskauer Rose LLP
Former US Supreme Ct. Correspondent Heads Labor and Employment
New Providence, NJ Group in Los Angeles, CA
@DavidWeisenfeld
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
20
July 19, 2018
XpertHR Template
21