what to expect in government construction contracting august 27, 2009 presented by: robert e....
TRANSCRIPT
What to Expect in Government Construction Contracting
August 27, 2009August 27, 2009
Presented by:Presented by:
Robert E. KorrochRobert E. Korroch
Williams MullenWilliams Mullen
Part One:Primer on Government
Contracting
What is Different When the Owner is
the Government?
4
Contracting with the sovereign– The requirement for competition– Socio-economic programs– The political factor
The government’s contracts are comprehensive– Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”)– FAR provisions and clauses– Agency FAR supplements
5
The government’s contracts contain unique requirements– Contractor duty to proceed during a dispute– Government’s unilateral right to terminate for its
convenience– Termination for default
The government is a powerful customer– Limited waivers of sovereign immunity– Numerous ways to “remedy” poor performance
Before You Bid
7
Bid Should Take into Consideration Costs of Complying with Labor
Standards
Davis Bacon Act Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act Collective Bargaining Agreements Equal Opportunity Regulations
8
Be Prepared to Implement Compliance Programs
Written code of business ethics and conduct
Due diligence to prevent and detect criminal conduct and promote culture of compliance– Timely self-disclosure
9
Compliance Programs
Business Ethics Awareness and Compliance Program– Training programs– Internal control system
Anti Kickback Act Gratuities Buy American
The Dilemma of Transparency—When to Self
Report
11
More to do Before You Bid: CCR and ORCA Registration
Central contractor registration:– www.ccr.gov
Online representations and certifications application:– https://orca.bpn.gov
12
Finding Opportunities
Focus Market research
– Customers in your region– Pre-solicitation and pre-bid conferences– Internet resources (e.g., www.fbo.gov)
13
Study the Solicitation
Understand the evaluation factors that will be the basis for award
Understand the source selection criteria Evaluate the type of contract to
understand how risk of cost overruns is being shifted--Two ends of the spectrum:– Cost reimbursement contract: Government
(Owner) assumes the risk of cost overruns– Firm-Fixed Price contract: Contractor assumes
risk of cost overruns
14
Risk Shifting
Myth: “I only bid firm-fixed price, so I don’t need a complicated accounting system.”
Truth: High likelihood of Government gaining access to cost data even under FFP– Requests for equitable adjustment under the
changes, suspension of work, and other clauses
– Claim for costs pursuant to a Termination for Convenience claim
Part Two:Hot Topics: Challenges that Arise from Teaming to Win Small Business Set-Aside Contracts
ACOE Update
Teaming For Small Business Set-Aside
Contracts
17
The Teaming Push—Why?
Customer demands specialized technology, competencies, and highly skilled work force
Source selection criteria require depth of experience and past performance
Successful proposals are expensive to write
Not every bidder wins
18
Small Business Set Aside Programs—The Other Reason for Teaming
Small business set-asides 8(a) Program HUBZone SBC SDVO SBC
19
Size Standards: What is Small?
NAICS assigned to each procurement
Size standard based on either:
– Annual receipts: Total receipts over most recently completed three fiscal years divided by three; or
– Number of employees: Average number of employees for each of the pay periods for the preceding completed 12 calendar months.
20
“Team Arrangement”
FAR uses the term “Team Arrangement” Generally describes two kinds of
relationships:– Joint Venture: Two or more companies form a
partnership or joint venture to act as potential prime contractor; or
– Teaming Agreement: A potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.
FAR 9.601
21
FAR Policy
Government will recognize team arrangements; provided arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer.
FAR 9.603
Joint Venture
23
Joint Ventures Rare for Small Business Set-Asides
A joint venture usually results in the creation of a new entity that would be considered to be large for SBA size purposes
Joint ventures for small business set-aside projects are not advisable except when they fall under special rules, e.g.– 8(a) Mentor and Protégé– JV among specially qualified small businesses
for an acquisition that exceeds one-half of the size standard
Teaming Agreement Overview
25
Key Components of a Teaming Agreement
Identify the solicitation (the “program”) Specify each party’s responsibilities in
proposal preparation Exclusivity Process for entering into a subcontract Terms of the subcontract
– Agreed division of the statement of work– Subcontract pricing
Why All of This Detail in a Teaming Agreement?
27
The Evil That Lurks inTeaming Arrangements: Affiliation
In determining the concern's size, SBA counts the receipts, employees, or other measure of size of the concern whose size is at issue and all of its domestic and foreign affiliates, regardless of whether the affiliates are organized for profit.
28
Affiliation Scenario
Procurement is total small business set- aside– Small business prime teams with large
business sub
Size status is protested/award is lost Bidder accused of false certification or
submitting false claims
29
Affiliation Definition
Concerns and entities are affiliates of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.
30
Bases for Affiliation
SBA will consider the totality of the circumstances.
SBA may find affiliation even though no single factor is sufficient to constitute affiliation.
31
Bases for Affiliation
Ownership of stock or options Common management Identity of interest Newly organized concern rule Joint ventures
32
Ostensible Subcontractor
A contractor and its ostensible subcontractor are treated as joint venturers, and therefore affiliates, for size determination purposes.
An ostensible subcontractor is a subcontractor that performs primary and vital requirements of a contract, or a subcontractor upon which the prime contractor is unusually reliant.
33
Ostensible Subcontractor
Prime contractor unusually reliant on subcontractor– Bonding assistance (construction)– Cooperation in writing the proposal– Prime planning to use sub’s facilities– Cooperation in performing the work
34
Ostensible Subcontractor
Subcontractor performing primary and vital requirements– Sharing of key employees– Prime planning to hire sub’s employees– Technical assistance– Contract management– Percentage of work
35
Ostensible Subcontractor
SBA is particularly suspicious when the subcontractor is the incumbent contractor and is ineligible to submit a proposal because it exceeds the applicable size standard for that solicitation.
36
Minimum Percentage of Work Requirements
For set-aside service contract, small business concern must perform at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract incurred for personnel with its own employees;
In the case of a contract for general construction, the concern will perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract with its own employees (not including the costs of materials). [50% for HUBZone]
37
The Size Status Protest
Procedure Outcomes Awardee’s disadvantage:
– The first team to have its award protested loses
Collateral consequences:– False Statement: Knowingly and intentionally
certifying a large business as small.– False Claim: Certifying that a business is small
to obtain a benefit from the Government.
38
Avoid the Pitfalls
Small business primes: Think twice about teaming with the large business incumbent.
Large business: Be willing to relinquish control to the small business prime.
Use Teaming Agreements, but show in the Agreement that the small business prime is running the show.
39
Avoid the Pitfalls
In the Proposal: Discuss the Teaming Agreement and the small business prime contractor’s independence.
Be prepared to defend against a size status protest if you win (goes back to performing due diligence in choosing your teaming partner).
Two More Hot Topics
41
New FAR Requirements
E-Verify– Clause will be incorporated in covered contracts
awarded after Sep. 8, 2009
Project Labor Agreements– E.O. 13502 (Feb. 2, 2009) encourages agencies
to consider requiring PLAs for construction projects over $25M
– Proposed FAR amendment issued July 14, 2009
– Comment period extended 30 days on August 18, 2009
Robert E. “Bob” KorrochRobert E. “Bob” KorrochNewport News, VA
757.249.5100
North Carolina Virginia Washington, D.C. London, England
www.williamsmullen.com
Contact Information