When you look at NCLB data, WHAT are you looking at?????

JES: Grade 4 and Grade 5

JMHS: Grades 7,8,10, 11

So what is assessed with KCCT at these grade levels?

KCCT Data

JES: Grade 4 Reading Grade 5 Math

JMHS: Grade 7 Reading Grade 8 Math Grade 10 Reading Grade 11 Math

This impacts our district because it increases the number of students we tested. This increases the confidence Interval (makes the range smaller).

How is this year’s Data Different?

Wellstone Amendment

Consequencesare only for schools/districtsthat receive Title I Funding

Why is this information so significant?

JES AMO Counts JMHS AMO Counts

JES: Grade 4 Reading Grade 5 Math

JMHS: Grade 7 Reading Grade 8 Math Grade 10 Reading Grade 11 Math

The data reflects both test data from 2005 AND 2006.

Targets vary due to the student population.Count the YES boxes to determine the # targets.

JISTargets increase at increments to move our students to proficiency by 2014..

Last year there is a 3 year period before standard is raised annually. Increases at increments to

move all students to proficiency by 2014.

JIS Reading

Goal 45.21

Target populations

JIS Math

29.62 30.29

0.67

Interventions• CDIP: Revisions will be made to the CDIP• Tentative activities:Provide PD for staff in the area of incorporating

math into the content areasPACE maps will be developed to ensure the Core

Content for Assessment and Program of Studies are being taught

Continue Depth of Knowledge trainingContinue Authentic AssessmentsContinue Real world application of mathematics

JES

JES Reading

53.86

JES Math

32.14

Basically the same groupCounted three ways…

JMHS NO Consequences----

Yearly goals

JMHS Reading

40.88

JMHS Math

28.36

Interventions• CSIP: Revisions will be made to the CSIP• Tentative activities:Provide PD for staff in the area of incorporating math into

the content areasPACE maps will be developed to ensure the Core Content

for Assessment and Program of Studies are being taught Continue Depth of Knowledge trainingContinue Authentic AssessmentsContinue Real world application of mathematicsMentors for new teachersPurchase Software that can be used during ESS and

during classroom instruction

Neither school nor the district is in consequences.

If JMHS did not use Title I funds, they could not have any consequences even if they missed AYP every year.

To have consequences, the school would have to miss AYP for two consecutive years.

Comparison tp local schools

JENKINS Yes

Floyd No

Hazard Yes

Knott No

Letcher No

Perry No

Pike Yes

Pikeville No

Comparison tp local Middle Schools

M/H Middle SchoolReadin

g Math Tier

JENKINS Yes No 1st year

Allen Central Yes Yes  

Belfry No No Not Title I

Pikeville Yes Yes  

Prestonsburg (Adams) No Yes Ist year

South Floyd No Yes 1st year

Virgie Yes Yes  

Whitesburg Yes Yes  

Comparison tp local High Schools

MH/H SchoolReadin

g Math Tier

Allen Central Yes Yes 2

Belfry No Yes Not Title I

Bell No No Not Title I

Betsy Layne No Yes I

Breathitt No No 3

Clay No No Not Title I

Cordia Wavier    

East Ridge No No Not Title I

Hazard Yes Yes  

Knott Co. No No 2

Letcher Co. Central No No Reconfigured

Phelps Yes Yes Not Title I

Pike Central Yes Yes Not Title I

Pikeville Yes Yes Not Title I

Prestonsburg No No 3

Shelby Valley Yes Yes Not Title I

South Floyd Yes No 3

AYP is one measure of accountability. It reflects reading and math at specific grades only.

CATS data will be available is September and will give us a broader picture ofStudent achievement in multiple areas.