why innovators can’t be afraid to fail

Upload: fathalbab

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Why innovators cant be afraid to fail

    1/2QP www.qualityprogress.com0

    InnovatIon ImperatIve BY Peter Merrill

    Risky BusinessWhy innovators cant be araid to ail

    Norm LarseN celebrated 39 previous

    ailures when he named his breakthrough

    new product WD-40, which is short or

    Water DeterrentAttempt Number 40.

    He invented the product in 1953, and

    nearly 60 years later it is still regarded as

    one o the most useul products on the

    planet.

    Larsens example proves that innova-

    tors cant be araid to ail. As Thomas

    Edison said, Genius is 1% inspiration

    and 99% perspiration. But the biggest

    ear people have when trying something

    new is the ear o ailure and the ear to

    take a risk. More than anything else, in-

    novation is a risky business.

    Risk is the our-letter word that stops

    businesses rom innovating. In large part,

    we are averse to risk because we under-

    stand it more than we did a decade ago.

    We are able to calculate, prioritize and

    mitigate risk. Because o these abilities,

    we have developed a mindset that risk

    should never enter our lives.

    And yet risk is necessary. Without

    taking risks, Columbus would not have

    sailed the ocean, the Wright brothers

    would not have own, and Armstrong

    and Aldrin would not have reached the

    moon.

    What drove Larsen to create WD-40

    was a need. WD-40 was not a solution

    looking or a problem; it was the

    answer to a need at that time. More

    oten than any other single cause, auto-

    ignition systems ailed due to damp

    plugs and cables short-circuiting.

    Larsen asked, How can we drive away

    damp? He answered that question,

    and his product went commercial in

    1958. Ater that, nobody let home

    without WD-40.

    Create, execute

    Innovators risk their reputation when

    they develop crazy new solutions. They

    risk ridicule rom their colleagues, and

    they are oten accused o being mad

    scientists. The media also make much

    o accidental breakthroughs such as

    Alexander Flemings discovery o penicil-

    lin. Yet these accidents and crazy

    solutions are only a small part o the

    innovation process.

    The creative phase o the innovation

    process is the point at which we fnd

    opportunity and potential solutions.

    This creative phase is, in truth, relatively

    low risk and certainly low budget when

    compared with the execution phase

    o innovation, at which point the risk

    increases signifcantly. Beore entering

    the execution phase, we must select our

    preerred solution, ocus on making it

    user riendly and deliver the solution to

    the market.

    I your oering is not user riendly

    when it reaches the market, it will not

    succeed. Historically, this was the great

    strength o Kodak. Founder George

    Eastman said, You press the button,

    well do the rest. More recently, the frst

    digital cameras were slow to be accepted

    because they were not user riendly.

    Daniel Kahneman was awarded a

  • 7/28/2019 Why innovators cant be afraid to fail

    2/2

    January 2012 QP 51

    Nobel Prize or economics in 2002, in

    part because he showed that or a new

    product to be accepted by the user, it

    needed to achieve a tenold increase

    in perceived value. I you say your o-

    ering is twice as nice, youre not even

    close. What the late Steve Jobs did

    so well was understand the user. He

    created user interaces that worked or

    real people.

    Partner problems

    The innovators real risk is not whether

    the product will work; thats dealt with

    in the development stage. The risk is

    whether the new oering will be accept-

    ed and whether new business partners

    will deliver. Larsen, or example, needed

    fve years beore WD-40 became a com-

    mercial product.

    In addition to taking risks and being

    willing to ail during product develop-

    ment, innovators have even more risk

    involved in product deliveryupstream

    risk with new business partners and

    downstream risk with customer ac-

    ceptance.

    As part o risk measurement, Intel

    measures its ailures against successes.

    It is said that unless it gets 10 ailures or

    every success, it doesnt think its taking

    enough risk.

    A new product portolio should con-

    tain a mix o potential new products that

    will come to ruition in one, fve and even

    10 yearsthe longer the time, the higher

    the risk. The portolio should range rom

    improvements driven by immediate

    customer need to radical new oerings

    customers dont even realize they need

    the more radical the oering, the higher

    the risk.

    I you have a new oering, its almost

    guaranteed you have new suppliers. The

    classic calculation is that with our new

    suppliers, three will have a 90% prob-

    ability o delivering, and one will be at

    40%. That means the overall probability

    o your oering coming together is 0.9 x

    0.9 x 0.9 x 0.4 = 0.2929%.

    Thats a serious case or risk mitiga-

    tion. That does not mean you walk away

    rom your great new idea; it means you

    manage that 40% supplier very careully.

    And, i necessary, you buy and manage

    the supplier yoursel.

    We identiy risk with a new sup-

    plier, not just by evaluating its product,

    but by evaluating its quality manage-

    ment systemor the quality o its

    management. A potential new supplier

    will always show you the shiny new

    component that works or the delighted

    customer they service well. You must

    evaluate how its leadership works.

    Use the management and measure-

    ment clauses o ISO 9001 to audit the

    supplier. Use the HR clause to evaluate

    how it develops its people as well as its

    product.

    Stand and deliver

    Supplier risk is the risk attached to

    bringing the product together. Then,

    theres the risk o being able to deliver.

    Delivery risk also revolves around

    business partners. I you are going

    to use a distributor or a marketing

    partner, you need to ully understand

    their decision cycles on new oerings.

    I its an annual cycle, you may be at

    serious risk o missing the boat on your

    new product launch. You might need

    alternative distributors or agents built

    into your business strategy to mitigate

    this risk.

    As you can see, true innovators have

    many areas to consider as they calculate,

    prioritize and mitigate risk. In the end,

    however, they still must take risks. QP

    W a ab o clcult, ptz n tt

    k. Bcaus of hs abs, w hav dvopd a

    mnds ha sk ul nv nt u lv.

    Peter Merrill s psdn of Qus

    Managmn Sysms, an nnovaon

    consuancy basd n Bungon, On-

    ao. M s h auho of sva

    ASQ Quay Pss books, ncudngDo

    i rgh h Scond tm, scond d-

    on (2009), and innovaon Gnaon

    (2008). H s a mmb of ASQ and

    h ASQ innovaon tchnca Comm.

    The righT readWhile its great when things go right the rst time, thats rarely

    the case, which is why its crucial to be able to learn from

    your mistakes. Read about how to turn that ability into lasting

    change at your organization in Do It Right the Second Time,

    second edition, by Peter Merrill, available in the ASQ Quality

    Press bookstore (http://asq.org/quality-press).