why not retain hyderabad · history; and any division is nothing but artificial. these artificial...

4
THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY November 5, 1955 Why Not Retain Hyderabad ? Raghu Jagirdar This is a down to earth and vigorous demand for the retention of the present State of Hyderabad by a Congressman who has no nostalgia fur kababs or Hyderabad culture. The author is a member of the Rajya Sabha and belongs to Gulbarga, a border bilingual district, which under the new dispensation may go to Karnataka. For the people of his district, however, Mysore is at the back of beyond; it is with Hyderabad that they have their ties which are more than a century old now. W I T H all the pious aspiration of the States Reorganisation Com- mission for the 'emotional integra- tion' of different language groups, the Commission has unwittingly caused a wave of mental disintegra- tion throughout the country. Every State has somehow begun to think in narrow terms. Some have even gone to the extent of accus- ing the Report of having "released political passions, communal suspi- cions and provincial rivalries all over the country." It in an irony of fate that a Com- mission, which was empowered to redraw the map of India, should have shown signs of nervousness instead of following firm principles based on solid foundations in its 267-page report. As if unnerved by the point- ed finger of a martyr, Sriramulu, at its very birth, this high-powered Commission seems to have gone astray in its struggle to escape from the consequences of its own creation. Otherwise, there would have been no reason for confusion over its original stand of high principles and later surrender and inevitable re- treat. Contradictory Findings Whatever be the other reactions to the SRC Report, it has failed to evoke that enthusiasm that was due to its far-reaching recommendations with regard to the future map of India. Perhaps, even such a map would have been readily acceptable as one coming from a high-powered body if there were no elaborate high- sounding arguments on the one hand and unconvincing or contra- dictory findings on the other. No conclusions have been based on any firm principles applicable to the whole of India. The main trouble was not so much over the bulk of the language areas as over their borders, and the claims and counter claims accompanying them, which the Commission has left unsolved. The border dispute has been allowed to rage on furiously. With its confused thinking, the Commission has only presented self- contradictory evidence. The Com- mission at the very outset, while declaring its stand against accept- ing language or culture as the deter- mining factor-since the idea of a federating unit, organised as the political expression of a single group, would inevitably encourage exclusi- vism'—has itself fallen prey to the idea of linguistic division, with the exception perhaps of Bombay State. So far as the people of Hydera- bad State are concerned, the SRC's entire assessment and conclusions are neither based on, nor related to. facts. Its attitude can in no way be helpful to the healthy growth of nationalism in this country. It has failed to make out a genuine case for disintegration, save by sur- rendering to nauseating slogans of bygone days. The most that can be said is that the SRC has helped in sacrificing a composite State at the altar of linguism, i.e., casteism, though it might have proclaimed itself against any sort of appeasement. There could be no meaning today in attempting to find fault with the origin of a former feudal State. Whatever be its former anti-national tinge, now this self-same, much- hated 'historical accident' is fulfil- ling a most vital need, consistantly with India's present spirit of nationalism. Focal Point It cannot be denied that of all places in India, Hyderabad stands out as the focal point in every sphere. Not only is it India in miniature in all aspects, but also the meeting place of the South and North. What the situation demand- ed was not its nominal retention In a truncated form, but the effort to matte other States, wherever pos- sible, follow such a composite pat- tern or tradition. To deprive an existing State of such a character may mean depriving the country of a heritage. All the talk of disintegration by a certain type of people means no- thing more than inherent suspicion of one another, and that too, stran- gely enough, after India has become free. The SRC would have done the right thing if it had suggested the formation or adoption of a fool- proof "one State two languages" or "one language two States" formula so as to serve as a safety device against the dangers of fascistic fanaticism. This might have to some extent enabled those in the South to fight the growing menace of linguism. A politician may find in the SRC recommendations new avenues for an adventurist future, but those people in this State who have roots in the soil or the common folk in the countryside are simply perplexed and perturbed over the Commission's proposals for the disintegration of language areas. What such dis- integrated areas are to achieve which they could not hope to achieve by continuing in the present set-up, is difficult to understand. How these areas will fare in a new at- mosphere and new set-up has re- ceived no consideration at all. Dis- integration may at the most satisfy for the time being either the fanatic or self-centred fringe. Where this fanaticism will lead India to. is a problem worth pondering over. In respect of Hyderabad, the Com- mission seems to have lost its direc- tion and failed to take the right and logical course, which it has itself advocated for bilingual Bom- bay or with regard to the question of retaining Karnatak Bidar in the nine Telengana districts of Hydera- bad. The problem of Hyderabad is not so simple as to be disposed of off-hand. The Commission has not cared to go deep into the matter or tried to know the feelings and wishes of the people in the country- side. Border State After all, Hyderabad happens to be a sort of border State; hence it is not just a unilingual or bilingual entity. It has even a trilingual 1307 Views on States Reorganisation- V

Upload: others

Post on 01-Apr-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why Not Retain Hyderabad · history; and any division is nothing but artificial. These artificial "sub stantially united" areas in the Dec-can came together after the arrival of Allauddin

THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY November 5, 1955

Why Not Retain Hyderabad ? Raghu Jagirdar

This is a down to earth and vigorous demand for the retention of the present State of Hyderabad by a Congressman who has no nostalgia fur kababs or Hyderabad culture.

The author is a member of the Rajya Sabha and belongs to Gulbarga , a border bilingual district, which under the new dispensation may go to Karnataka. For the people of his district, however, Mysore is at the back of beyond; it is with Hyderabad that they have their ties which are more than a century old now.

W I T H a l l the pious a sp i ra t ion o f the States Reorganisa t ion Com­

mission fo r the ' emot ional in tegra ­t i o n ' of different language groups, the Commiss ion has u n w i t t i n g l y caused a wave of men ta l d is in tegra­t i o n th roughou t the count ry . E v e r y State has somehow begun to t h i n k in n a r r o w terms. Some have even gone to the extent of accus­i n g the Report of h a v i n g "released po l i t i ca l passions, communa l suspi­cions and p rov inc i a l r iva l r ies a l l over the count ry . "

I t in an i r o n y of fate t h a t a C o m ­mission, w h i c h was empowered to r ed raw the map of I nd i a , should have shown signs of nervousness instead of f o l l o w i n g f i r m principles based on sol id foundat ions in i ts 267-page report . As i f unnerved by the point ­ed finger of a m a r t y r , S r i r a m u l u , at i t s ve ry b i r t h , th i s high-powered Commission seems to have gone as t ray in i ts s t ruggle to escape f r o m the consequences of i ts own creat ion. Otherwise, there w o u l d have been no reason for confusion over i t s o r i g i n a l s tand o f h i g h principles a n d la te r surrender and inevi table re-t reat .

Contradictory Findings Whatever be the other reactions

to the SRC Report , i t has f a i l ed to evoke t h a t enthus iasm t h a t was due to i ts f a r - reach ing recommendat ions w i t h r ega rd to the future map o f I n d i a . Perhaps, even such a map wou ld have been read i ly acceptable as one coming f r o m a high-powered body i f there were no elaborate h i g h -sounding a rguments on the one h a n d a n d unconv inc ing o r cont ra­d i c to ry f indings on the other . No conclusions have been based on any f i r m principles applicable to the whole o f I n d i a . The m a i n t rouble was no t so m u c h over the b u l k of the language areas as over the i r borders, and the c la ims and counter c la ims accompanying them, w h i c h the Commiss ion has le f t unsolved. The border dispute has been a l lowed to rage on fu r ious ly .

W i t h i t s confused t h i n k i n g , the

Commiss ion has on ly presented self-con t r ad i c to ry evidence. The Com­mission at the very outset, whi le dec lar ing i ts s tand aga ins t accept­i n g language or cul ture as the deter­m i n i n g f a c t o r - s i n c e the idea of a federa t ing un i t , organised as the po l i t i ca l expression of a single group, wou ld i nev i t ab ly encourage exclusi-vism'—has i t se l f fa l len prey to the idea of l inguis t ic d iv is ion , w i t h the exception perhaps of B o m b a y State.

So far as the people of Hydera ­bad State are concerned, the SRC's ent i re assessment and conclusions are nei ther based on, nor re la ted to. facts. I t s a t t i tude can in no way be helpful to the hea l thy g r o w t h o f na t i ona l i sm i n th is coun t ry . I t has fa i led to make out a genuine case for d i s in tegra t ion , save by sur­render ing to nauseat ing slogans of bygone days.

The mos t t h a t can be said is t ha t the SRC has helped in sacr i f ic ing a composite State at the a l t a r of l ingu ism, i.e., casteism, though it m i g h t have procla imed i tself against any sor t of appeasement. There could be no meaning today in a t t e m p t i n g t o f ind f a u l t w i t h the o r i g i n of a fo rmer feudal State. Whatever be i ts fo rmer an t i -na t i ona l t inge, now this self-same, much-hated ' h i s to r i ca l accident ' i s f u l f i l ­l i n g a mos t v i t a l need, cons is tant ly w i t h Ind ia ' s present sp i r i t o f na t iona l i sm.

Focal Point I t cannot be denied tha t of a l l

places in Ind i a , H y d e r a b a d stands out as the focal point in every sphere. N o t only i s i t I n d i a in m i n i a t u r e in a l l aspects, bu t also the meet ing place of the South and N o r t h . W h a t the s i tua t ion demand­ed was no t i ts n o m i n a l re tent ion In a t runca ted f o r m , but the effort to matte o ther States, wherever pos­sible, f o l l ow such a composite pat­t e rn or t r a d i t i o n . To deprive an ex i s t ing State of such a character m a y mean dep r iv ing the coun t ry of a heri tage.

A l l the t a l k o f d i s in t eg ra t ion by a

cer ta in type of people means no­t h i n g more than inherent suspicion of one another, and t h a t too, s t r an ­gely enough, af ter I n d i a has become free. The SRC w o u l d have done the r i g h t t h i n g i f i t had suggested the f o r m a t i o n or adopt ion of a foo l ­proof "one State t w o languages" or "one language t w o States" f o r m u l a so as to serve as a safety device against the dangers of fascistic f ana t i c i sm. This migh t have to some extent enabled those in the South to fight the g r o w i n g menace of l i ngu i sm.

A po l i t i c i an m a y f ind in the SRC recommendat ions new avenues for an adventur i s t future, bu t those people in this State w h o have roots in the soil or the common f o l k in the countryside are s imply perplexed and per turbed over the Commission 's proposals for the d i s in tegra t ion of language areas. W h a t such dis­in tegra ted areas are to achieve w h i c h they could no t hope to achieve by con t inu ing in the present set-up, is diff icul t to unders tand. H o w these areas w i l l fare i n a new at­mosphere a n d new set-up has re­ceived no considerat ion a t a l l . Dis­in t eg ra t ion m a y a t the most satisfy for the t ime being ei ther the fanat ic or self-centred f r inge . Where this f ana t i c i sm w i l l lead I n d i a to. is a p rob lem w o r t h ponder ing over.

In respect o f Hyderabad , the Com­miss ion seems to have lost i t s direc­t i on and fai led to take the r i g h t a n d logica l course, w h i c h i t has i t se l f advocated fo r b i l i ngua l B o m ­bay or w i t h regard to the question o f r e t a i n i n g K a r n a t a k B i d a r in the nine Telengana d i s t r i c t s of H y d e r a ­bad. The problem of Hyderabad is no t so simple as to be disposed of off-hand. The Commiss ion has not cared to go deep i n t o the ma t t e r or t r i e d to k n o w the feelings and wishes of the people in the count ry­side.

Border State A f t e r a l l , Hyde rabad happens to

be a sor t of border State; hence it is no t jus t a u n i l i n g u a l or b i l i n g u a l en t i t y . I t has even a t r i l i n g u a l

1307

Views on States Reorganisation- V

Page 2: Why Not Retain Hyderabad · history; and any division is nothing but artificial. These artificial "sub stantially united" areas in the Dec-can came together after the arrival of Allauddin
Page 3: Why Not Retain Hyderabad · history; and any division is nothing but artificial. These artificial "sub stantially united" areas in the Dec-can came together after the arrival of Allauddin

November 5, I955

aspect. I t s t e r r i t o r y in spread over t h e K a r n a t a k d i s t r i c t s o f B i d a r , G u l b a r g a a n d Ra ichur , the M a r a t h ­w a d a d i s t r i c t s o f Nanded a n d Os-m a n a b a d a n d the Te lengana d i s t r i c t s o f Mahboobnagar , N izamabad , A d i l a -b a d a n d also the H y d e r a b a d dis­t r i c t . There are over 508 thousand Te lugu , 338 thousand M a r a t h i , 833 thousand U r d u a n d 261 thousand K a n n a d a b i l i n g u a l speakers,

The ex ten t o f b i l n g u i s m in the whole Sta te is 14.2 per cent; i t ranges f r o m 13 to 18 in M a r a t h w a d a , 13 to 21 in Telengana a n d 17 to 22 per t e n t i n K a r n a t a k ; a n d i n H y d e ­r a b a d d i s t r i c t , i t i s 20 per cent. At least a popula t ion of 2,653,118 are b i l i n g u a l w h o speak another I n d i a n language besides t h e i r mothe r -tongue. Thus b i l l n g u l s m i s f a i r l y extensive. T h e census records show t h a t in these d i s t r i c t s one out o f every four is bi l l ingual .

I n s t ead o f t r y i n g t o k n o w the r e a l needs and aspira t ions of the people, the Commiss ion has o n l y re­l i e f on the evidence o f ce r ta in busy-bodies a n d i n v a r i a b l y on t h a t t ime-w o r n s logan o f d i s in t eg ra t ion . T h a t s logan m i g h t have served a t the beg inn ing as a sor t of a r g u m e n t to c a r r y on an a g i t a t i o n . B u t t oday a f t e r the miserable experience f o l ­l o w i n g police act ion, t h a n k s to the behaviour o f the ne ighbour ing I n -guis t ic enthusiasts, t h a t s logan has los t i t s g l a m o u r and ac tua l ly yie lded place to a sort of fear a n d appre­hension. The recent M u l k i move­m e n t o r the r i s i n g i n d i g n a t i o n aga ins t people of the a d j o i n i n g language areas is too fresh to need m e n t i o n here.

Tha Commiss ion , In i ts verd ic t , Bays t h a t "publ ic sent iment b o t h t r t t h : n and w i t h o u t the State, i s o v e r w h e l m i n g a n d ins is tent on the need fo r the d i s in t eg ra t ion of the State ." H o w it a r r i v e d at such a conclus.on is d i f f icu l t to unders tand . In ths f i r s t place, " the publ ic sent i ­m e n t " p reva i l i ng " w i t h o u t " has no meaning , since i t has n o t h i n g a t s take and i ts demand m a y be op­posed to local wishes and interests . As f a r as sent iment " w i t h i n " i s con­cerned, i t has no v a l i d sanct ion . E n l i g h t e n e d opinion feels t h a t the s!ogan of d i smemberment w a s so le ly m e a n t to get r i d o f the N izam ' s ru le .

To s t ' ck to t he s logan even a f t e r the emergence of a democra t ic set­up on the p a r t of po l i t i ca l leaders is nothing bu t an a t t emnt to save themselves f r o m being dubbed as i n ­consis tent by the i r p o l i t i c a l oppo­nents . Moreover , in the past, w h e n

t h i s s logan w a s raised, the ques t ion o f r eo rgan i sa t ion o f States was n o t before the people, a n d any decision f o r the wholesale l i q u i d a t i o n o f the State w i t h o u t a clear ve rd ic t of t he people on th i s specific issue w o u l d n o t be d e m o s r a t e .

Free Association" The Commiss ion has preferred to

m a k e sweeping r e m a r k s t h a t the three "areas were subs tan t ia l ly u n i t ­ed o n l y under the au thor ty o f the A s a f J ah i dynas ty . The u n i t y was n o t baaed on a free associat ion of the people." W h a t a discovery to m a k e about Hyde rabad , a s i f I t cou ld no t be applied w i t h greater force to other par ts of I n d i a ! Where a n d when was t h a t "free associa­t i o n " ever t h o u g h t ox before the advent o f the B r i t i s h ? W h e n i s th / . t State w h i c h has no t been "sub­s t a n t i a l l y un i t ed under the autho­r i t y " of some power or the other, no t to speak of UP or even the SRC's composite b i l i n g u a l Bombay o f G u j a r a t a n d M a h a r a s h t r a ?

T h a t a t t e m p t to dub Hyderabad as an a r t i f i c i a l u n i t i s s imply i r r a ­t i o n a l . I n fact , every s t a t e i s an a r t i f i c i a l un i t , i n c l u d i n g the States proposed by the C o m m i s s o n . I n d i a is one, h a v i n g the same cu l tu re a n d h i s to ry ; and a n y d iv i s ion i s n o t h i n g bu t a r t i f i c i a l . These a r t i f i c i a l "sub­s t a n t i a l l y u n i t e d " areas in the Dec-can came together af ter the a r r i v a l o f A l l a u d d i n o r the se t t l i ng d o w n of the Bahamanis , l ong before the advent of the Mughala or the Asaf -Jahis . Wha teve r m a y be the rea­sons, A u r a n g a b a d , Golkonda , B i d a r and Gu lba rga have somehow l ived a common or " subs tan t i a l ly u n i t e d " l i fe for over s ix centuries; and never before i 'n h i s to ry h i v e the people of A u r a n g a b a d , Go lkonda a n d G u l ­ba rga o r D e o g r i , K a l y a n i and M a l -k h o d been dependent on Bombay , and Poona, K u r r o o l o r Mysore . The people of these areas have l ived a n d suffered together in the past d u r i n g grea t upheavals ; and they n a t u r a l l y feel t h a t j u s t when freedom has come, they are being dismembered a n d depr ived of the joys of a "sub­s t a n t i a l l y u n i t e d " l i fe i n the i r j o i n t m a r c h t o f reedom.

Deccani Culture The Deccan ' cu l tu re m a y or may

not be d i f fe ren t f r o m tha t prevalent i n f o r m e r B r i t i s h I n d i a ; bu t i t s con­t r i b u t i o n m a y be deemed somewhat d i f ferent . C a l l i t by any name, H y d e r a b a d has evolved, whether in r u r a l or u r b a n areas, a c o m m o n social a n d economic ou t look and a w a y o f l i f e , w h i c h m a y n o t be easily

unders tood unless one l ives in the H y d e r a b a d atmosphere.

The Commiss ion m a y f ind i t sur­p r i s ing , bu t th i s c o m m o n cu l tu re based on unders tand ing , tolerance, a n d fe l low-fee l ing has beon a m a j o r c o n t r i b u t i o n to the quest fo r u n i t y tn I n d i a . There way some signif ic­ance when the P r ime M i n i s t e r h i m ­self declared close on the heels of t h y Police A c t i o n t h a t the people or the State w o u l d be g iven a chance to decide about the i r future and t h a t the police ac t ion was confined to ths r e m o v a l of feudal ru le .

The SRC seems to be more en-t h u s a s t i c in the cane of H y d e r a b a d t h a n in respect of the rest of I n d i a over divis ions on geographica l a n d demographic lines. The Commiss ion convenient ly forgets t h a t these "de­mograph ic features" apply w i t h greater force to the rest of I n d i a as a who 'e t h i n to Hyderabad . I n d ' a h i s a n i n d i v i d u a l i t y and v a r i e t y u n ­l i k e the regimented or com­m o n pa t t e rn a n d mode o f l i v i n g i n W e i t e r n countr ies . I n w h i t w a y can "demographic features ' be more va r i ed between A u r a n g a b a d a n d W a r a n g a l t h a n between Cuteh a n d the Goa borders, w h i c h the compo­site B o m b a y State, the h a n d i w o r k of the Commiss ion , i t se l f repre­sents?

No Need for H u r r y The Commiss ion seems to be l i v ­

i n g in a w o r l d of i t s o w n . Otherwise h o w can "the apprehensions fel t by the educa t iona l ly b a c k w a r d people of Telengana t h a t they may be swamped and exploi ted by the more advanced people of the coastal area" d ; f fer in the case of the M a r a t h ­w a d a a n d K a r n a t a k dis t r ic ts o f the same State? T a k i n g in to consider­a t ion the same state of affairs a n d a l l the disadvantages and d i sab i l i ­ties w h i c h Telengana w o u l d face n V i s h a l a n d h r a , the Commiss ion could have adopted the same i m p a r t i a l a t t i t u d e towards the common back­w a r d M a r a t h w a d a a n d K a r n a t a k regions.

There was no need f o r such h u r r y a t th is j unc tu re when these back­w a r d regions af ter centuries of sub­jec t ion were Just s e t t l i ng down rand l o o k i n g f o r w a r d t o development t h r o u g h va r ious schemes. By a l l ow­i n g the T u n g a b h a d r a o r Ra ichur area to develop, the H y d e r a b a d people n a t u r a l l y feel t h a t the C o m ­miss ion could have not only a l lowed the con t inua t ion of the same ad­m i n i s t r a t i o n t h a t planned the pro­jec t , bu t also t r i ed to help the pro­gress of H y d e r a b a d State a n d i t s

THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY

1309

Page 4: Why Not Retain Hyderabad · history; and any division is nothing but artificial. These artificial "sub stantially united" areas in the Dec-can came together after the arrival of Allauddin

November 5,1955 THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY

K a n n a d a areas. A l l th i s Ungu's t ic d i s t r i b u t i o n could have w a i t e d as the accent is no longer on mere a g r i c u l t u r a l development, w h i c h was perhaps dependent on l inguis t i c ho­mogenei ty . The accent n o w is on i n d u s t r i a l development. I n d u s t r i a l development m a y be dependent on the a v a i l a b i l i t y o f n a t u r a l resources, but no t so m u c h on l inguis t ic homo­genei ty.

K a r n a t a k B i d a r has, however, been re ta ined by the Commiss ion in res iduary H y d e r a b a d State fo r the sake of the so l i da r i t y of I n d i a . In the present Assembly, out of 96 members f r o m Telengana, 50 be­l o n g to the Opposi t ion a n d 44 to the .Congress. W i t h the add i t i on o f 11 Congress members f r o m B i d a r , the s t r eng th w o u l d be 55 Congress as against 50 Opposi t ion In a House of 105. Ins t ead of such a precarious m a j o r i t y in spite o f B ida r . w h y no t include G u l b a r g a and Raichur , w h i c h have the same a f f in i ty a n d c o n t i g u i t y a s B i d a r w i t h Hyderabad? W h y th i s hazardous break and dis­loca t ion of l i fe in these cont iguous d i s t r i c t s by s p l i t t i n g and f o r c i n g t hem to j o in K a r n a t a k - M y s o r e ? Moreover , Ra i chu r a n d Gu lba rga do no t differ m u c h f r o m Bidar , whose "undoubted K a r n a t a k areas are also somewhat remote f r o m Banga lo re a n d Mysore . "

Urdu-speaking Population

Speaking about H y d e r a b a d C i t y , the Commiss ion takes i n t o consi­de ra t ion the posi t ion of 45.4 per cent of the Urdu-speak ing popula t ion . A n d l ikewise f o r the re ten t ion o f B i d a r i n res iduary Hyde rabad , i t pleads fo r the Urdu-speak ing popu­l a t ' on , a p a r t f r o m advanc ing o ther considerat ions such as " t h a t a d m i ­n i s t r a t i ve ly , B i d a r has v e r y close l i n k s w i t h H y d e r a b a d " etc. O f the 86.2 per cent H i n d u popula t ion , the la rger section is in the eastern h a l f o r the Telengana area t h a n in the western h a l f o r M a r a t h w a d a a n d K a r n a t a k areas. Of the s ix f o r m e r M u s l i m capi ta ls i n the State, t w o , namely , Go lkonda a n d Hyde rabad , are in the centre, and the r e m a i n i n g four, namely , A u r a n g a b a d , D a u l a t a -bad, B i d a r and Gu lba rga , are in the Wes te rn ha l f . These are the v e r y por t ions w h i c h the Commiss ion has s t r ange ly sought to w r e n c h f r o m H y d e r a b a d to be added to the remote regions o f Mysore o r B o m b a y on u n ­tenable a rgument s .

A l i t t l e ca lcu la t ion w i l l show t h a t ou t of 11.8 per cent of Mus l ims , a t o t a l n u m b e r of 53.3 per cent l i v e i n u rban areas; a n d H y d e r a b a d C i t y

accounts f o r 22.0 per cent of t h e i r t o t a l popula t ion . I n Bidar , w h i c h has received special cons idera t ion f r o m the Commiss ion , the i r per­centage is 42.9. The Commiss ion , w h i c h i s so loud in i t s pleadings to t a g B i d a r t o H y d e r a b a d C i t y , w i t h a M u s l i m popula t ion of 44.7 per cent, a g a i n convenien t ly ignores the f ac t or fa i l s to apply the same consider­a t i o n t o Gu lba rga a n d A u r a n g a b a d where the percentage rises to 48.3 a n d 43.9 respectively.

Common Life W h a t r e a l l y weighed w i t h the

Commiss ion in dec id ing on d i smem­berment o f the State is r a t he r d i f f i ­cu l t t o unders tand . A f t e r a l l , the area is a contiguous one; and, f o r good or bad. the people have l ived together fo r the past so m a n y cen­turies . Somehow, a common l i fe has been evolved, w h i c h has stood the test of t ime ; at least, here in the H y d e r a b a d regions there has not been so f a r t h a t v i r u l e n t caste or language an tagonism, w h i c h is so vehement in o ther pa r t s of the coun t ry , especially in the South.

T a k i n g i n t o considerat ion these o v e r w h e l m i n g factors , there is need fo r a detached v i e w a n d fo r a l l o w ­i n g the s ta tus quo in the case of

t h e present H y d e r a b a d State . A l ­ready i n the w a k e o f the d i s n t e g r a -t i o n proposals o f the SRC, there have been d i sma l por tents of paro­c h i a l i s m ; selfishness i s t u r n i n g fr iends and colleagues i n t o oppo­nents a n d r i v a l s in a race f o r t e r r i ­t o r i a l possessions. In a s t rugg le f o r power between Telengana. a n d A n -d h r a a l l sorts o f manoeuvre m a y be t r i e d . Some m a y even raise for the i r selfish ends, the bogey of " I n d i a i n danger" a t the s igh t o f Hyde rabad State j u s t as the League used to raise the bogey of " I s l a m in danger" a t the s igh t of the Con­gress,

The SRC, ins tead of s o l v i n g the problem of the fu ture set-up of I n d i a , seems to have created more problems fo r fu tu re generat ions . A f t e r a l l , the Repor t Is no t such a sacrosanct document needing i m m e ­dia te imp lemen ta t ion . Reorganisa­t i on is no t a ha l f -hea r ted measure, a n d i t cannot be implemented in a h u r r y i n the m i d s t o f m o u n t i n g tension a l l round . R e d r a w i n g o f the map for a d m i n i s t r a t i v e or deve­lopment purposes m a y become neces­sary o n l y when the coun t ry has sufficiently advanced i n d u s t r i a l l y a n d not otherwise .

1310