why the lower cost of moocs will not lead to improved access

26
MOOCs: Why Low-Cost Will Not Create Equal Access Nathan Garrett Yesica Allaya eLearn 2013, Las Vegas, NV Wednesday, October 23 rd , 1:30-2:00pm http://profgarrett.com

Upload: nathan-garrett

Post on 18-Jan-2015

1.166 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

This is a presentation I did at eLearn 2013. It presents evidence about the relative role of Moocs, Online Learning, and Traditional Face-to-Face education modes. Essentially, I'm trying to show that just decreasing the cost of education is not enough to get everyone equal access.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

MOOCs: Why Low-Cost Will Not Create Equal Access

Nathan GarrettYesica Allaya

eLearn 2013, Las Vegas, NVWednesday, October 23rd, 1:30-2:00pm

http://profgarrett.com

Page 2: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Moocs are…

• “the biggest revolution in education since the printing press…”

Page 3: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Quality

Retention: How many students

complete successfully?

Pedagogy: What teaching techniques are

used?

Cost: What does the overall educational experience cost?

Access: What type of students are

recruited?

Page 4: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 5: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access
Page 6: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Traditional Higher Ed

• 5,599 colleges & universities• 21m students• 70% public• >50% over 23• 40% part-time

Page 7: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

How many students graduate?

Page 8: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Private Not-For-Profit Four-Year Public Four-Year Private For-Profit Four-Year

67%

57%

26%

45%

39%

16%

60%

46%

28%

75%

65%

36%

White, Non- Hispanic Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander

We have unequal success between ethnic groups

Page 9: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

92-93 97-98 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

-$4,000

-$2,000

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

Public 2-year Public 4-year Private 4-year

What students pay in tuition hasn’t significantly changed

Page 10: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

What does it cost?

Page 11: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey and decennial census: Percentage of the Population 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed High School or College: Selected Year 1940-2009

But, we educate more of the population

Page 12: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle for Traditional Higher Education

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 13: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Online Learning

• 32% of college students have taken at least one course

• 9% yearly growth rate

Page 14: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Access

• Requires – Prepared & motivated students

• Minorities have lower levels of computer preparation & skills

• Non-traditional also do worse

– Heavy feedback• Perceived as harder

– by all students

Page 15: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Cost

Page 16: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Outcomes

• Perceptions v. reality– Perceptions? Employers rank lower– Reality? Outcomes similar

Page 17: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle for Online Learning

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 18: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Mooc

• xMooc v. cMooc– Dave Cormier, Bryan Alexander, George Siemens,

and Stephen Downes

Page 19: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Retention

• Range: 25%, 12%, 5%...

• Are these really serious completers?

• Coursera: – Overall: 7-9%– Intend to complete: 23%– Complete first assignment: 40%– Signature Track: 70%

Page 20: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

http://mfeldstein.com/validation-mooc-student-patterns-graphic/

Page 21: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Cost per Completion

• Free v. “Free”• Cost

– Edinburgh, $46k– U Penn: $50k

Page 22: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Access

• Who finishes a Mooc?– 70% has BA/BS, half graduate degree– Majority outside US– 60% of Coursera income <50k

• San Jose– Developmental classes in Pilot

• 29-51%, 20% lower than traditional

Page 23: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Iron Triangle for Moocs

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Page 24: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access
Page 25: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access
Page 26: Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

MoocOnlineFace-to-face

Cost

Access Quality