winning toyota: the critical role of a regional workforce program
DESCRIPTION
Winning Toyota: The Critical Role of a Regional Workforce Program. Presented to the Roundtable in the High Desert October 18, 2007 ByBill Fredrick Wadley-Donovan GrowthTech. In February of this year, the Tupelo area of Northern Mississippi won Toyota’s 8 th North American assembly plant. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Winning Toyota: The Critical Role of a Regional Workforce ProgramPresented to the Roundtable in the High Desert
October 18, 2007
By Bill FredrickWadley-Donovan GrowthTech
2
In February of this year, the Tupelo area of Northern Mississippi won Toyota’s 8th North American assembly plant.
Contributing factors were numerous, and many individuals and agencies contributed significantly to the victory.
3
Today we will look at the very important role one of those factors played in the final decision….
…..a regional workforce database and the system that delivered its customized information to Toyota’s corporate decision-makers and site selectors.
4
The Project 8th Toyota assembly plant in North America
– Announced: February 26, 2007– Product: Highlander SUV– Production starts: 2010– Direct jobs: 2,000– Capital investment: $1.3 billion – Activities: stamping, body weld, plastics,
paint and assembly– Annual vehicle production: 150,000 – Average wage: $20/hr after 3 years
5
The Project The location
– Blue Springs, MS–10 miles NE of Tupelo– 1,700-acre Certified TVA Mega-Site
“Wellspring Project” The competition
– Originally 25 sites– Narrowed to approximately five semi-finalist sites– Three in the greater Memphis area: Blue Springs/
Tupelo; Marion, AR; Brownsville, TN– All three locations have certified large industrial sites– Blue Springs site selected as the winner
6
The Location Drivers Suitable sites Specific utility, infrastructure and transportation
needs Favorable operating environment and costs Incentives?
– MS gave less than it did four years ago to Nissan ($296 M vs. $363 M)
Sufficient skilled and experienced labor as the final and most important location factor
7
The Importance of Labor
8
“The primary reason Toyota selected Tupelo was the quality of the workforce and the leadership in this community.”
Governor Haley BarbourProject announcement February 26, 2007
9
“…. this great Toyota project gives us a spectacular way to replace those good furniture jobs with superior, better paying jobs in the auto industry. This situation was also key to why Toyota knew such a strong workforce will be available to it and its suppliers.”
Governor Haley BarbourProject announcement February 26, 2007
10
“What I observed were people who are educated, ethical and friendly with a strong work ethic – a perfect match for Toyota.”
Ray Tanguay, EVP Toyota Project announcementFebruary 26, 2007
11
How Did the Three Locations Become Finalists? Each provided a certified large industrial site They demonstrated availability of all necessary
utility, infrastructure, transportation and other operating requirements
A tremendous effort by well-coordinated, hard working and dedicated team players (state, local, regional, utilities, educators)
Strong organizational infrastructure and support structure in each area
12
What made a key decision-making and deciding difference?
13
Tupelo couldTupelo could
PROVEPROVEit had the labor force it had the labor force
needed by Toyota.needed by Toyota.
14
Proving the Labor Force Case
15
Background The Memphis Regional Economic Development
Council (REDC) created– Council of local EDOs– Greater Memphis region– 52-county region within three states– Divided into 8 sub-regions of aggregated counties– Diverse area: demographically, economically
16
Background
17
Background The Memphis Regional Economic Development
Council (REDC) created– Primary missions: develop regional economic
development synergies, provide cost sharing for resource development; and cooperative, effective, efficient, and coordinated marketing
– “Coopetition” among members– Created the basics (workforce assessment and
extensive database development, target industry identification) in July 2006
18
Background Workforce assessment inputs (WDG/Younger Assoc.)
– Employer survey– Household survey – Employer and key-influencer interviews– Focus groups– Secondary data
19
Background Employer survey data
– Mail/Internet– Employers with 20+ employees– 3,483 sent, 374 completed (10.4% stratified
return)– Employer background data– Employee quality measurements– Availability by occupation– Educator/employer interface– Commute distance– Other
20
Background Household survey
– Face to face; not by telephone– Working age residents 18-70 year olds– 3,600 completed surveys– Stratified, statistically valid sample, +/- 5% MOE, 95%
confidence level – Extrapolated to entire population– Full demographic characteristics– Employment status– Occupations, skills, experience– Training desire– Geo-coded– Residential and work locations
Combined survey data into a unified database delivery system (WDG/YA)
21
The Unified Labor Force Database Delivery System An on-line data delivery system
– Full access to all of the survey data
– Fully accessible by all REDC members in their offices
– A powerful tool
22
The Unified Labor Force Database Delivery System Combined all of the employer and household survey
data into one relational database– Employee characteristics (e.g. demographic data,
employment status, availability for employment or training, goals and desires, commute patterns, occupation and training)
– Employer experiences (e.g. labor availability by occupation, labor quality assessments, wages/salaries, experience with educators, industry and functions performed, number of shifts, union status, labor demand)
23
The Unified Labor Force Database Delivery System Extensive customized cross-tabulation possible by
the user Able to retrieve information on a county, multiple
county, regional, or sub-regional basis; also in 25, 50, 75, 100 mile radii from any given address
Side-by-side location comparison capability Easy 24/7 data access
24
The Unified Labor Force Database Delivery System
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
How the DDS Helped Toyota’s Site Selection Toyota site consultants approached EDO’s for each
of three Memphis regional locations– Fall 2006
– Through state representatives
– Also worked with TVA (TN, MS), Entergy (AR)
33
How the DDS Helped Toyota’s Site Selection
Marion, ARMarion, AR
Brownsville, TNBrownsville, TN
Tupelo, MSTupelo, MS
34
How the DDS Helped Toyota’s Site Selection Toyota requested specific area data Region’s EDOs quickly provided initially requested
labor data to Toyota using DDS Consultants impressed with speed and depth of
provided data Brownsville eliminated for various reasons
35
How the DDS Helped Toyota’s Site Selection Toyota requested detailed customized cross-tabulated
data and radii information for two remaining sites– First 65-mile radius from sites, then cluster of counties– Available skill sets (number)– Manufacturing experienced labor (number)– Number of residents with skilled or trades
manufacturing experience– Women and minorities with manufacturing experience
or skill sets (number)– Residents wanting to work in manufacturing (number)– The under-employed not a factor
36
How the DDS Helped Toyota’s Site Selection Toyota fascinated with data available
through the DDS Toyota given own system password; continued to dig
into labor information on own at Japan and U.S. HQs for Marion and Tupelo sites
Toyota consultants conferred regularly with EDOs, working as a team (YA involved).
37
How the DDS Helped Toyota’s Site Selection Other sites did not have this depth of data. It enabled Toyota to conduct detailed on-going data
mining. It allowed MS to confirm its claims of a strong and
sizable available manufacturing workforce from the declining furniture industry.
38
The Value of a Regional Labor Database System It provided the data at the desired detail and speed. The depth of the data and systems delivery
capabilities held Toyota’s interest in the region’s sites.
It was a big factor in keeping Toyota’s focus on the region
39
The Value of a Regional Labor Database System It set the region apart from the competition. Workforce problems are expected wherever it goes:
DDS provided Toyota with an upfront comfort level on their understanding of the workforce.– Reduced risk– Allowed Toyota to know problems now, avoiding
future unpleasant surprises
40
Lessons Learned Regional coopetition allowed for development of
– A project-winning, regional workforce database
– A flexible delivery system that quickly answered complex client questions in the client’s office
– An affordable resource
– A resource for comparative and detailed intra-region evaluation by site selectors
41
Lessons Learned Workforce is the number-one deciding locational issue
overlying sites, infrastructure, incentives, utilities, operating costs, market access.
Current, complete primary labor data makes the difference.– A key factor: needed from the supply and demand
sides of the labor equation– Supplementary up-to-date secondary data needed
(IEDC standards)
42
Lessons Learned It is critical and advantageous to have labor (and other)
data presented or made available as needed by the prospect.
Flexibility of data delivery and customized manipulation is important.
On-line data availability for comparative analysis gives the competitive edge.
505 Morris Avenue, Suite 102Springfield, NJ 07081Tel: 973-379-7700Fax: 973-379-7771www.wadley-donovan.com/workforce
E-mail: [email protected]