wombat voting

45
Wombat Voting 1. Designed (2009-2010) 2. Implemented (2010-2011) 3. Deployed (1 x 2011, 2 x 2012)

Upload: river

Post on 24-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Wombat Voting. Designed (2009-2010) Implemented (2010-2011) Deployed (1 x 2011, 2 x 2012). Project Participants. Amnon Ta Shma (TAU) Douglas Wikstrom (KTH) Ben Riva (TAU) Niko Farhi (TAU) Morgan Llewellyn (IMT Lucca) Jonathan Ben-Nun - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wombat Voting

Wombat Voting

1. Designed (2009-2010) 2. Implemented (2010-2011)3. Deployed (1 x 2011, 2 x 2012)

Page 2: Wombat Voting

Amnon Ta Shma (TAU)

Douglas Wikstrom (KTH)

Ben Riva (TAU)

Niko Farhi (TAU)

Morgan Llewellyn (IMT Lucca)

Jonathan Ben-Nun

IDC Students: Tomer Gabbai, Doron Sharon, Shiran Kleiderman, Ido Bergerfroind, Asaf Gamliel, Daniel Rapaport, Omri Baumer, Asaf Inger, Eitan Grundland

Project Participants

Page 3: Wombat Voting

Simple design

Voter privacy

End-to-end verifiability

No need to trust the designers!

Easy to useVersatilePaper backup

Main Objectives

Page 4: Wombat Voting

Simple and Familiar

Page 5: Wombat Voting

System components

Dual ballotVoting machinePolling station committeePublic bulletin boardMixnet

Vote

glue

Page 6: Wombat Voting

The Ballot

א א

glue glue

Page 7: Wombat Voting

Voting Booth

• Vote selection• Ballot printing

• Hardware– Touch screen– Printer

Page 8: Wombat Voting

Polling Station

• Voter identification• Vote casting • Hardware

– A desktop computer– 2D barcode scanner

Page 9: Wombat Voting

Website (Hebrew)

Page 10: Wombat Voting

Website (English)

Page 11: Wombat Voting

Election set-up

Page 12: Wombat Voting

Voting

Page 13: Wombat Voting

Tallying

Encrypted votes are mixed by the mixnet.Mixed decrypted votes and proofs of correctness

are published in the Bulletin board.Paper votes may be tallied according to policy.

Page 14: Wombat Voting

Auditing

Auditing the machine (“cast as intended”):Audit by users using Android application.Random audit by designated auditors.

Auditing the bulletin board.Android application.

Validation of mixnet proofs of correctness:Built-in verifier.2 Independent verifiers.

Page 15: Wombat Voting

Verification (manual)

Page 16: Wombat Voting

Verification (phone)

Page 17: Wombat Voting

Behind the scenes

Auditing the booth: cast-or-audit

Page 18: Wombat Voting

Behind the scenes

Auditing the booth: cast-or-audit

Auditing the tally: Verifiable Mixnet

Page 19: Wombat Voting

Elections with Wombat

IDC Student council elections: May 17-19 2011

Meretz party chairman: February 7, 2012

IDC Student council elections: May 21-23 2012

Page 20: Wombat Voting

IDC 2011 Elections

Non-profit college with ~6000 students.28 different races.Students eligible to vote on multiple races.2097 students voted.

Page 21: Wombat Voting

Some Statistics

Voting took 1-2 minutes:30 Seconds for voter identification30 Seconds for scanning the ballot

579 voters verified ballot at bulletin boardStudents encouraged to verify with a coveted prize(2 x faculty parking spots).

Page 22: Wombat Voting

Questionnaire

403 students answered an on-line survey.78 answered a random exit survey.

Students encouraged to answer by offering prize.

High levels of voter satisfaction and confidence.The processes of folding ballots and validating

votes should be improved.

Page 23: Wombat Voting

Questionnaire

“How satisfied are you with your voting experience?”

“The Voting Process Was Clear and Simple”Very satisfied Satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissastisfied Don't know

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%

Online surveyExit survey

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree or disagree

Disagree somewhat Strongly disagree0.00%

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%

Did not verifyVerified ballot

Page 24: Wombat Voting

Meretz Party Leader

Party leader elected by party council consisting of 950 representatives.

Highly diverse set of voters:Age (many over 50), gender, education, ethnicity…

830 (88%) voted.23 voters verified

their vote.

Page 25: Wombat Voting

IDC 2012 Elections

2120 Students voted.Only 16 students checked their votes.

Page 26: Wombat Voting

Difficulties & Lessons

Technical difficulties:Electricity power loss.Printer hanging.

Difficulties in folding the ballot.Mitigated by volunteers instructing voters before

entering the voting booth.

Page 27: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 28: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 29: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 30: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 31: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 32: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 33: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 34: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 35: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 36: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 37: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 38: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 39: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 40: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 41: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 42: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 43: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 44: Wombat Voting

Pictures

Page 45: Wombat Voting

Website URL

http://www.wombat-voting.com