working paper infid 2008 = usaid vs kuala bubon

Upload: infid-jakarta

Post on 30-May-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    1/26

    NGO in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations

    WorkingPaperNo.4,

    2008

    WE ARE BABY TURTLES,

    WHO HAVE TO BE CLOSE TO THE SEA:

    Research Team:George Junus Aditjondro

    Eddy Purwanto

    HOW LOCAL OWNERSHIP IS UNDERMINED BY DONORS

    A Case Study of Tsunami Victims,Whose Resettlement Rights are Threatened

    by a USAID-financed Highwayin Aceh, Northern Sumatera, Indonesia

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    2/26

    - ii -

    WE ARE BABY TURTLES,

    WHO HAVE TO BE CLOSE TO THE SEA:HOW LOCAL OWNERSHIP IS UNDERMINED BY DONORS

    A Case Study of Tsunami Victims,Whose Resettlement Rights are Threatened

    by a USAID-financed Highwayin Aceh, Northern Sumatera, Indonesia

    Research Team:George Junus Aditjondro

    Eddy Purwanto

    Working Paper No.4, 2008

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    3/26

    CONTENT

    Acknowledgment i

    HowLocalOwnershipisUnderminedbyDonors ii

    Introduction: 1

    ResearchMethodology: 4

    ResearchFindings: 10

    Conclusions: 16

    Recommendations: 18

    Bibliography: 19

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    4/26

    - i -

    Acknowledgment

    ThestudywasfullyfinancedbyYAKKUMEmergencyUnit(YEU),aprominent

    organizationworkingindisastermanagementandpreventioninIndonesia.YEU

    isamember

    of

    ACT

    (Action

    by

    Church

    Together).

    YEU

    has

    extensive

    works

    in

    disaster areas,both naturaldisasters and humantriggereddisasters (conflicts)

    suchasinthetsunamiandearthquakedevastatedregionofAcehandNias,the

    disaster areas of Yogyakarta and Central Java, interreligious conflicts in

    CentralSulawesiandMaluku,andinotherareasinIndonesia.YEUisalsotaking

    partinsupportinghumanitarianaidinthecyclonedevastatedareasinBurma.

    Grateful thanks toDr.GeorgeJunusAditjondroandMr.EddyPurwantowho

    didtheresearchinthefieldsandinthelibrariesandnewspapersofficesinAceh

    and

    Yogyakarta.

    Special

    thanks

    to

    Dr.

    Sigit

    Widjajanto,

    the

    director

    of

    YAKKUM,

    who is persistently doing advocacy for the rights of people in Kuala Bubon

    althoughheknowsthatheischallengingtheglobalgiant.

    Thanks toRebeccaYoung from the PresbyterianChurchJakartawho did the

    EnglisheditingofthereportandtoMr.SuwarnoatINFIDwhomadethepaper

    intothisform.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    5/26

    - ii -

    HOWLOCALOWNERSHIPISUNDERMINEDBYDONORS

    Thefollowingcaseistrulyanexampleofhowownershipisunderminedwhenit

    comes to its implementationat local level,where the lifeand livelihoodof the

    grassrootspeopleareconcerned,wherethepeoplesdignityisthreatened,where

    all the desperate efforts of the people to restore their life and livelihood are

    underminedbythedonorsandthegovernment.

    The reconstruction of the village ofKuala Bubon inAcehwas an example of

    what theparticipatorydevelopmentpractitionersarealwaysdreamingof: fully

    participationofthecommunitymembersfromplanning,physicalreconstruction

    design, environmental considerations, participatory implementation and

    participatorymanagement,womenparticipationandleadershipandtherespect

    tothe

    childrens

    rights.

    It

    was

    not

    an

    easy

    task,

    of

    course.

    Even

    when

    the

    humanitarian agencies came to offer the support to the community, the

    communityasked to theagencieswhether theirdesignswere in linewithwhat

    the people expected. The community members elected the agency through a

    ballotboxmechanismfacilitatedbyUNOCHA,afterapresentationofdesignsof

    programsbytheagencies.YEU(YAKKUMEmergencyUnit)wastheoneelected

    by majority of the community members to facilitate the whole process of

    reconstructionandalongtermcommunitydevelopmentplans.

    The

    village

    of

    Kuala

    Bubon

    that

    was

    totally

    devastated

    by

    tsunami

    in

    December

    2006 is now in place. They people are happy with the results of the

    reconstruction; the results of their own efforts.The sense of ownership of the

    wholeprocessand results isvery strongand thepeopleofKualaBubonhave

    enjoyedlivinginthehousestheyplanandtheybuildtogetherinthecommunity.

    Thestudyshowshowthedonorpersistentlypushedthepeopletorelocateand

    howthedonordoesnotrespecttherightsofthelocalcommunities.Thoughitis

    agrantforthesurvivorsoftsunamiinAceh,itdoesnotmeanthattherightsof

    thesurvivorscanbeunderminedandtheirvoicescanbeignored.

    The case study also proves what Naomi Klein said in her book The Shock

    Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism that the donors in cooperation with

    transnationalcorporations (consultancy firmsand theminingcorporations)use

    the disaster as vehicle to impose their conditionalities (with ultimatum) to

    achieve theirownobjectives.Thehighwayconstruction innarrowanddensely

    populated areas is hardly accepted that it is for the benefit of the local

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    6/26

    - iii -

    communities. It must be for the interests of big corporations that need fast

    transportation;andAcehisrichofoilandnaturalgasthetwonaturalresources

    that have been long exploited by transnational corporations and that have

    becomethemaincausesoflongconflictsinAceh.

    Thecasestudyshowsthateventhedonorscannotrecognizethelocaldemocratic

    ownershipasthefirstprincipleintheParisDeclarationonAidEffectiveness.

    DonK.Marut

    ExecutiveDirector

    INFID

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    7/26

    - 1 -

    WEAREBABYTURTLES,WHOHAVETOBECLOSETOTHESEA:

    ACaseStudyofTsunamiVictims,WhoseResettlementRightsareThreatened

    byaUSAIDfinancedHighwayinAceh,NorthernSumatera,Indonesia

    ByGeorgeJunusAditjondro1andEddyPurwanto2

    INTRODUCTION:

    THISisacasestudywithvariouscharacteristics.Firstofall,thisisacase

    studywhere the sovereignty of grassroots villagers is threatenedby the self

    proclaimedsovereigntyofoneoftheworldslargestaidagencies:theUSAgency

    for InternationalDevelopment (USAID).Secondly, it isacase studywhere the

    reconstructionofaregion, terriblydestroyedbyanaturaldisaster,hasbecome

    heavilydependent

    on

    the

    dictates

    of

    aid

    agencies,

    and

    in

    particular,

    on

    USAID.

    Thirdly, it is a case study

    which further highlights

    what Graham Hancock

    has emphasized in his

    LordsofPoverty:ThePower,

    Prestige and Corruption of

    the International Aid

    Business (1989), namely

    howofficial

    development

    aid(ODA)oftenmasksthe

    interests of large private

    corporations, particularly,

    oil and construction

    companies.

    Next, it is a case studywhere the peace settlementbetween a national

    government and a provincebased independence movement is financially

    underminedbybureaucratsinthenationalcapital,increasingthedependenceof

    Acehsprovincial

    government

    on

    USAID,

    thereby

    eroding

    the

    accountability

    of

    1). Independent researcher, with special interest in the political economy of post-disaster reconstruction in

    Aceh and Nias, and has written several reports published by the International NGO Forum for Indonesian

    Development (INFID). With a Ph.D. and an M.S. from Cornell University, Dr. Aditjondro is currently a

    guest lecturer at the Sanata Dharma University in Yogyakarta.2). Community organizer (CO) of YAKKUM Emergency Unit (YEU), with field experience in Aceh,

    currently in charge of advocacy for the rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Aceh and other

    places served by YEU. He has a B.A. in Law.

    26 August 2005. Post-tsunami Kuala Bubon. A large part of the villagelandmass has been reclaimed by the sea

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    8/26

    - 2 -

    thegovernmenttograssrootscommunities,inparticular,thefisherfolksofKuala

    Bubon,whoarerebuildingtheirlivelihoodafterthe2004tsunamitookathirdof

    theirvillageandmanyoftheirrelativesandneighbors.

    Finally, this isacasestudyof resilientvillagers,whohavecontinued to

    fightfortheirrightstomaintaintheintegrityoftheircommunityvisvisUSAID,

    inaDavidversusGoliathtypestruggle.

    Obviously, this is also a case studywhere postdisaster reconstruction

    activities,threatenedbytime(andbudget)constraints,oftenoverlookecological

    factors, local wisdom in rebuilding communities, health factors, and existing

    legalregulations.Whatmakesthiscasemoreunique,though,isthefactthatthe

    cultureand localwisdom in theprovinceofAceh is recognizedby Indonesian

    laws and provincial regulations (qanun), as well as by the Memorandum of

    Understanding(MoU)

    between

    the

    Government

    of

    Indonesia

    and

    the

    Free

    Aceh

    Movement(GAM,GerakanAcehMerdeka),signedinHelsinkionAugust15,2005.

    These legal obligations have been overruled by most posttsunami housing

    projects.

    Incontrasttothatgeneralpractice,thereconstructionofhousesofKuala

    Bubon,agampong (village) in thedistrictofWestAceh,hasbeenplannedand

    executed by an Indonesian nongovernment organization, YEU (YAKKUM

    Emergency Unit), after consulting the villagers and then rebuilding the entire

    village

    based

    on

    the

    peoples

    wish

    to

    remain

    near

    to

    the

    sea,

    to

    continue

    living

    as

    fisherfolks.Inan innovativeway,YEUhasrebuilt thepeoplesvillagewithan

    architecturalstyleinspiredbythevernaculararchitectureoftheSeruipeoplein

    WestPapua,wholiveinstiltedhousesabovethesea.Wearebabyturtles,who

    have tobeclose to thesea, is thepopularsayingof theKualaBubonvillagers

    (PuthutEA2007b:133).

    Atthetimeofwritingthisresearchreport,thisnewlyrebuiltKualaBubon

    villageand95otherhousesbuildbyotherNGOsinsevennearbyvillages are

    threatenedtobedestroyedbya30metrewidehighwaywhichistobebuiltwith

    aUSAID

    grant.

    Appeals

    from

    the

    Kuala

    Bubon

    villagers

    to

    USAID

    to

    reroute

    the

    road have fallen ondeaf ears.This hasmadepeoplewonder,what exactly is

    USAIDs motive to build a 30metre wide highway across a river delta,

    bulldozing its way through villages and houses rebuilt by national and

    internationalNGOs for these fisher folkswho refused to relocate far from the

    coast?

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    9/26

    - 3 -

    InordertoinvestigatethehiddenagendaofUSAIDspersistencetobuild

    itshighwayacrossKualaaswellasinvestigatethereluctanceofthenationaland

    provincial governments to challenge USAIDs persistence with its planned

    highway across Kuala Bubon, YEUs partner organization, CD Bethesda, has

    commissioned the authors of this report to do combined library and field

    research on thismatter.Admittedly, this research reporthasnot answered all

    questionssatisfactory.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    10/26

    - 4 -

    RESEARCHMETHODOLOGY:

    TO investigate the interestsbehindUSAIDspersistence inbuilding the

    northwesternhighwayacrossKualaBubon,aswellasthereluctanceofnational

    andprovincial authorities to challenge the agencys ignoranceof thevillagers

    feelings, the following researchmethodologyhavebeenemployed.Firstlyand

    continuously,theresearchteamhascollectedandreadvariousreportsavailable

    about the history and development of the Kuala Bubon resettlement project,

    literature about the localwisdom in themanagement of coastal villages, and

    official reports of the provincial government of the existing and forthcoming

    investmentprojectsinAceh,especiallyonthenorthwesterncoast.

    Secondly, the team did a content analysis of the local print media,

    especially the Serambi Indonesia daily, focusing on any news of the USAID

    financedhighway,

    to

    assess

    the

    attitude

    of

    provincial

    authorities

    and

    USAID

    officials towards local people protesting against the eviction or destruction of

    theirland,houses,andfacilitiestoearntheirliving.

    Thirdly, the research team carried out participant observation of the

    conditionofsegmentsoftheUSAIDfinancedroadbydrivingarentalcaralong

    the road fromMeulaboh toCalang and fromCalang toBandaAceh.Another

    formofparticipantobservationwasspendinganightatKualaBubontoobserve

    thedailylifeinthevillage.

    Fourthly,theresearchteamcarriedoutinterviewswithAcehgovernment

    officials, USAID officials,business people, activists, YEU staffwho hadbeen

    involved in the reconstructionofKualaBubonandvillagersalong theCalang

    BandaAcehhighway,whoselandhavebeenappropriatedtowidentheexisting

    road, and drivers of trucks employedby the road contractors.Unfortunately,

    interviews with Aceh officials, including the Governor, did not provide any

    usefulinformation,sinceeithertheydidnotknowmuchabouttheroadproject,

    ortheywerereluctanttocriticizetheUSaidagency.

    Fifthly,afocus

    group

    discussion

    (FGD)

    was

    carried

    out

    by

    the

    research

    teamwith thevillageeldersofKualaBubononJuly11,2008,attendedamong

    othersbytheKualaBubonvillagehead(keuchik),villagesecretary,villagecouncil

    of four elders (tuha peut), Village Development Body (LPD, or Lembaga

    Pembangunan Desa), and the marine customary chief (Panglima Laot) of the

    Samatigasubdistrict.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    11/26

    - 5 -

    Thesixthandfinalresearchmethodwasbyusing the internet facilityat

    YEUs TrainingCentre in Pakem,Yogyakarta, to search for ongoing news on

    KualaBubonandtoinvestigatethebackgroundofUScorporationsclosetiesto

    USAID.

    KUALABUBON,BEFOREANDAFTERTHE2004TSUNAMI:

    BEFORE the 2004 tsunami, Kuala Bubon literally, the mouth of the

    Bubon river wasaverybusy fishingvillage,withhundredsof fishingboats

    coming in and out the river every day. The villagers themselves at that time

    owned121boats.Themenweremostlyfishermen,famousfortheirfishingskills,

    with thewomenbuying the incoming catch,whichwas sold to fish vendors

    (muge),whom in turnrode theirmotorcycles tosell thefish toothervillages in

    theWestAceh district.Outsiders from the nearby districts ofAcehJaya and

    NaganRaya

    also

    frequented

    or

    stayed

    in

    Kuala

    Bubon,

    working

    as

    muge,

    as

    workersatthefishauctionterminal(TPI=tempatpelelangan ikan),asworkersat

    theicefactory,orascrewonKualaBubonfishingboats.Thevillagewasalways

    busy around the clock, except on Thursdays, when the men did not go out

    fishingatnight,sothattheycouldattendtheFridayprayersatthelocalmosque

    (PuthutEA2007a:1278;interviews).

    Administratively,KualaBubonbelongstotheSamatigasubdistrict,itselfa

    partofWestAcehdistrict,sandwichedbetweentheIndianOceanonitssouth

    and

    swamps

    on

    the

    north

    (Puthut

    2007a:

    128),

    which

    had

    partly

    been

    turned

    into

    brackishwaterfishponds(tambak).AspartofSamatigasubdistrict,the

    customaryfisheryormarineombudsman,orPanglimaLaot,accordingtoAcehs

    tradition(Syarif2003)ofKualaBubon,fallsunderthePanglimaLaotofSamatiga.

    Economically, the village and its inhabitantswere quitewell off. Taxes

    paid from the fish trade, ice factory, thenearbyport forCPO (crudepalmoil)

    tankers ofPTKaryaTanah Subur (KTS), and the fishingboatdockyard,have

    earned the title donorsvillage toKualaBubon. In addition to its economic

    reputation,manypeople fromMeulaboh, thedistrictcapital,oftencame to the

    villagejust

    to

    enjoy

    its

    beautiful

    sea,

    coast,

    and

    fish

    ponds,

    with

    the

    mountains

    onthebackground(PuthutEA20071:128).

    Politically,KualaBubonwas a safeplaceduring theprotractedguerilla

    war between the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Indonesian military,

    where refugees from other villages orparts ofAceh felt safe (idem).Thiswas

    important in those days as it is still now, after theAugust 15, 2005,Helsinki

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    12/26

    - 6 -

    26 August 2005. A view of post-tsunami Kuala Bubon and the rubbleof the remaining homes

    AgreementbetweenGAM and theTNI, since the rivalry is still alivebetween

    thosewho supportand thosewhooppose the independencemovement in the

    westernpartofAceh,whichharboralatentmovementtoseparatewesternand

    southernAceh from theprovince,backedby antiHelsinki agents in and from

    Jakarta.

    ThispeacefulandprosperouspictureofKualaBubonchanged radically

    after thewavesof the IndianOceansweptover thevillageon theafternoonof

    December 26, 2004.After the

    water resided, it was found

    that221ofthe929inhabitants

    ofKualaBubonhadperished,

    consistingof116 femalesand

    105 males. All the buildings

    hadbeen

    leveled

    to

    the

    ground, the existing bridge

    across the Bubon river that

    connected Kuala Bubon and

    its southern neighbour, Suak

    Timah,was sweptaway, and

    600m2 (6,500 square feet) of

    the village land was now

    under water (Puthut EA

    2007a:130).

    With thehelpofoutsideorganizations, the remaining 754KualaBubon

    villagers received temporary shelter in seven IDP barracks in the Samatiga

    subdistrict. TheWestAceh district government planned to resettle the entire

    village inCotSeumereung, avillagequite far from the sea,and issued anew

    regulation prohibiting anybody to residewithin 500metres of the coast line.

    Finally,only60families,mostlynotfisherfolks,relocatedtotwonearbyvillages

    CotSeumereungandGampongTengah ,while118familiesremainedinthe

    barracks,waitingforthetimetoreturntotheiroldvillage(PuthutEA2007a:130

    1,2007b:

    137

    8;

    interviews).

    ThatwasthetimethatYEU,whohadhelpedtobuildtherefugeebarracks

    at the old village,began seriously discussingwith the village leaders how to

    rebuildtheirvillage.First,theyneeded tocompensatefortheir land,losttothe

    sea,butwhatwasavailablewasonlyformerfishponds(tambak)thathadturned

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    13/26

    - 7 -

    20 May 2006. Building feeling of togetherness among the people ofKuala Bubon to start reconstruction (Strategic Plan forum)

    into swamps. With financial assistance of the Board of Rehabilitation and

    Reconstruction,orBRR (BadanKoordinasiRehabilitasidan Rekonstruksi) forAceh

    andNias,theWestAcehdistrictgovernmentpurchasedfourhectaresofland

    actually, swamps,with seawaterat adepthofone to threemetres , for the

    priceofRp17,000rupiahpersquaremetretorebuildKualaBubon.

    Consequently, this triggered thesecondquestions:should thoseswamps

    be reclaimedand thehousesbuilton solidground?Or, should thenewKuala

    Bubonhousesbebuiltonstilts,abovetheseawater?

    The second option

    was chosen. Apart from

    being too costly, estimated

    to reach 50 billion rupiah,

    the

    environmental

    and

    health risks of transporting

    millions of tons of gravel

    and sand from faraway

    places would be quite

    monumental. In addition,

    thenewunderwatersoiland

    sand in the Bubon delta

    were stillmoving, since the

    river

    currents

    and

    marine

    waveshadnotyetreacheda

    new equilibrium, and were still depositing sand. Hence, YEUs shelter team,

    headed by Setyo Dharmodjo, an architect with years of experience in the

    reconstructionofhomesfornumerousdisastervictims inIndonesia,decided to

    design 118 houses on stilts on the seabottom,with the accompanying public

    buildings on the remaining solid ground. As he told the researchers in an

    interview inYogyakarta onAugust 21, 2008, thiswashis second time he has

    designed houses on stilts on thewater. The first onewas inJayapura,West

    Papua, inspiredby the traditionalarchitectureof theSeruipeople.As it turned

    out,the

    costs

    of

    building

    118

    houses

    on

    the

    water

    in

    Kuala

    Bubon

    was

    much

    less

    thanthefirstoption,namelyaround16billionrupiah.

    Unfortunately,whilethevillagerswerestillcooperatingwithstaffpersons

    of YEU and its sister organization, CD Bethesda, to rebuild the community,

    residingin118housesonthewater,whichwasnotaneasytask,consideringall

    thetraumawhichthevillagershadgonethrough,anewdangerwaslurkingon

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    14/26

    - 8 -

    thehorizon:a30metrewidebridgeandhighway thatUSAIDwasplanning to

    build across theBubonBay.Letusnow turn to the history of thisproject, as

    reconstructedfromreportsandinterviewswithvariouspersonsinvolved.

    USAID:

    WHILE the Kuala Bubon

    villagers had basic survival as

    their ultimate goal in rebuilding

    their village, completely different

    considerationswereinthemindof

    certain international aid agencies,

    which had rushed to Aceh

    immediately

    after

    the

    2004

    earthquakeandtsunami.Sincenot

    onlyKualaBubon,butmajorparts

    of the northwestern coast

    provincial road fromMeulaboh to

    BandaAcehwasalsodestroyed,thisfactcreatedtheneedforamajoraidproject

    in the region.The two largest creditornations in theAsiaPacific,namely the

    USAandJapan,wereboth interested inrebuilding the240kilometreroadasa

    signatureproject,anaidprojectwhichwouldenable theAcehneseandother

    Indonesian

    people

    always

    to

    remember

    the

    generosity

    of

    those

    who

    donated

    that

    projecttotheIndonesianpeople.

    Soeagerwas theUSAgency for InternationalDevelopment (USAID)as

    well as theJapan InternationalCooperation System (JICS) to rebuild the road

    along Acehs northwestern coastline that the Indonesian Minister for Public

    Workshad to interfere. A compromisedealwas forged,bydividing the road

    into twosections.TheBandaAcehCalangsegmentof104,13kilometreswas to

    bebuiltbyUSAID,whiletheconstructionoftheCalangMeulabohsegmentwas

    handedovertoJICS.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    15/26

    - 9 -

    18 January 2007. Mr Setjo Darmojo explains the Kuala Bubon house

    building plan to Christine from USAID. The arrow points to the standingdemo houses

    Each aid agency

    contracted the

    construction of the

    roadsegmentallocated

    to them to different

    contractors, according

    to different standards

    and with quite

    different results. The

    USAID segment

    followed the US

    standard of 30metre

    wide highways, which

    was contracted to a

    jointventure

    of

    the

    South Korean

    construction company,

    SsangyongConstructionandEngineeringLtd,and the Indonesian stateowned

    company,PTHutamaKarya,forUS$108million(BisnisIndonesia,June25,2007),

    while the JICS segment was contracted to another Indonesian stateowned

    company,PTAdhiKarya,which in turn subcontracted it toa local contractor,

    known asHajiTito.ThisJICS segmentwas of verypoor standard, consisting

    mainly of capping the existing roadwith a thin layer of gravel and asphalt,

    which

    in

    many

    places

    has

    already

    worn

    off

    (Serambi,

    June

    30

    &

    July

    2,

    2007;

    interviews;observations).

    From Teunom inAcehJaya district to Samatiga inWestAceh district,

    JICSscontractordidnot follow theexisting road,butbuiltanewroad further

    inland,8metreswide.ThisroadcircumventedKualaBubonandothervillages

    around theBubonBaybyabout24kilometres, inanalignmentpopularizedby

    USAIDstaffinBandaAcehasthehorseshoe.Accordingtooneinformant,this

    wasdone tobring the road to thedoorstepsof thepersonalhouseofa former

    districthead(Bupati)ofWestAceh.Anotherinformant,however,deniedthatany

    WestAceh

    Bupati

    owned

    apersonal

    house

    anywhere

    along

    that

    horseshoe.

    The overall planning and supervision of the 240kilometre road from

    BandaAceh toMeulaboh, however,was contractedbyUSAID to aUS firm,

    namelyParsonsGlobalServicesInc,forUS$34.9million,ormorethanfourteen

    percentoftheprojectedvalueoftheentireroad,namelyUS$245million(Suara

    MerdekaCyberNews,Nov.14,2005;USAIDIndonesiaPressRelease,Nov.14,2005).

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    16/26

    - 10 -

    4 April 2007. Roy Ventura and Christine from USAID present andexplain the road construction to the people of Kuala Bubon, BRR,

    Spanish Red Cross, CRS and YEU

    RESEARCHFINDINGS:

    IN the following section we will describe the findings of the research

    team,whichhavecombined libraryresearch,fieldobservations, interviewsand

    internet search,which took place inYogyakarta andAceh fromJuly 18, 2008untilAugust25,2008:

    (a).AlthoughtheentireCalangMeulabohsegmenthadbeenassignedtoJICS,

    andnottoUSAID,afterthehorseshoealignmenthadbeenbuiltbyPTAdhi

    Karyaanditssubcontractor,theUSAIDofficeinBandaAcehsteppedinby

    askingParsonsGlobalServicesInc.tosuggestseveraloptionstoshortcutthat24

    kilometrehorseshoe

    alignment.

    Consequently,although

    theconsultancy

    companyofferedseveral

    options,rangingfrom

    moredeeperinlandto

    closertotheseashore,

    USAIDeventuallychose

    theoptionthatcrosses

    theriverwithahuge

    bridgeandthencuts

    acrossKualaBubonand

    alsocrushesahundred

    newlybuilthousesin

    sevenadjoiningvillages.

    NosatisfactoryanswerhasbeengivenwhyRoyR.VenturaJr.,theUSAIDAceh

    RoadProjectTeamLeaderhasrigidlymaintainedthatposition.

    (b).According to information provided to the research teambyKuala Bubon

    villagers,theUSAIDpersonstheyhadmetmaintainedthattheroutechosenby

    theAgency

    could

    neither

    be

    moved

    further

    inland

    nor

    closer

    to

    the

    seashore,

    and

    couldnotbebent.Observationbytheresearchteamhasfoundout,though,that

    alongtheCalangBandaAcehUSAIDfinancedroad,therearemanybends,and

    althoughinsomeplacesrockshavebeenblastedtoallowtheroadtogothrough,

    inmostplacesthe30metrewideroadsmoothlyfollowed thehillytopography,

    and insomeplaces theroadcamequiteclose to theshore,and inotherplaces,

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    17/26

    - 11 -

    the road went through reclaimed swamps, using geotextile sheets as a

    foundationfortherocksandsand.

    (c).TheUSAIDAcehRoadProjectTeamLeaderhas consistentlyunderplayed

    the social and environmental impact ofbuilding thebridge and road across

    KualaBubonandsevenothervillages,byplayingdown thenumberofhouses

    that may need tobe relocated. Sometimes mentioning four houses in Kuala

    Bubon, and at other occasions mentioning one or two houses, hasbeen the

    rhetoricgamehehasplayed.Infact,assessingfromtheyellowandredtagstied

    to spikes in the ground,which indicate the alignment of the proposed road,

    YEUsfieldstaffinMeulabohhasestimatedthatatotalof125housesneedtobe

    relocated, namely twenty in Suak Timah, twenty in Kuala Bubon, four in

    Gampong Tengah, five inGampongCut, 38 in Suak Pandan, fifteen in Suak

    Padebreh,threeinSuakSemaseuh,andtwentyinPribu.Thesehouseswerebuilt

    notonly

    by

    YEU,

    an

    Indonesian

    NGO,

    but

    also

    by

    the

    World

    Vision,

    the

    Catholic

    ReliefService(CRS),SOS(Swiss),theSpanishRedCross,theIslamicRelief,and

    HTF International.Apart from this direct adverse impact,what has notbeen

    publicizedbytheUSAIDisthatthe30metrewidehighwaywillsplitthoseeight

    villagesinaBerlinWallstyle,sinceforsecurityreasonsaswellasfortheirown

    safety, the localvillagerswill lose their freedom towalk across thathighway,

    wheremotoristswillenjoytheluxuryofracingtheirmotorcyclesandcarswith

    speedsofupto100kilometres/hour,whichtheyhaveneverexperiencedbefore

    inAceh.Oneneedsonly to lookat the statisticsofcasualties fromautomotive

    accidents

    in

    local

    clinics,

    to

    understand

    how

    any

    minor

    improvement

    in

    the

    qualityof the roads inAcehhas increased those fatalitiesevenbefore theUS

    stylehighwayhasbeenintroducedtotheprovince.

    (d).SpeakingoftheUShighwaysystem,oneshouldunderstanditshistoryinthe

    UnitedStatesofAmerica,whichmayhavesomerelevanceforusinIndonesia.In

    1921, theUSgovernmentstarted theUShighwaysystem,basedonaUSArmy

    report for national defense. US President Eisenhower greatly expanded the

    systeminthe1950s,anditisthereforeofficiallycalledtheEisenhowerNational

    SystemofInterstateandDefenseHighways.AccordingtoRebeccaYoung,aUS

    Presbyteriantheologian

    teaching

    at

    the

    Jakarta

    Theological

    Seminary

    (STT

    Jakarta),herownvillageinNorthGeorgiaisfightingagainstahighwaythrough

    herarea,becausethereasonforbuildingthathighwayistoallowthemilitaryto

    transportnuclearwastethrougharuralareainsteadofthecityofAtlanta.Soit

    isclear that theUSGovernmentregularly is in thehabitofdisruptingcitizens

    lives and the environment for military purposes, said Ms. Young in an

    interviewwith theresearch team.Thisraises than thequestion, isAceh indeed

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    18/26

    - 12 -

    facingsimilardefensechallengesas imaginedbyEisenhower, that theprovince

    needssuchwidehighways?

    (e).Unfortunately,theUSAIDteaminAcehhasaquitedominantpositionvis

    vis theprovincialgovernment,whichmakes thegovernment lessresponsive to

    the grassroots peoples complaints. This USAID dominance canbe deduced

    from three factors.Firstly, it canbededuced from the languageused topush

    through theconstructionof theCalangBandaAcehsegment,whichhadbeen

    slowed downby local peoples resistance at various places.After theUSAID

    team threatened to pull out from the entire project, labeled in the local print

    mediaasanultimatum,onecanreadstatementsfromtheAcehauthoritiesthat

    alsobecameharsher to the resistingparties (seeheadlinesofSerambi Indonesia,

    July 910, 2008). Secondly, Acehs provincial government has become quite

    financiallydependentontheUSAID,sinceIndonesiasnationalgovernmenthas

    delayedthe

    transfer

    of

    routine

    and

    development

    budget

    from

    Jakarta

    to

    Banda

    Acehformorethansixmonthsatthetimeofwritingthispaper.Thisdependence

    canbeseenfromthefactthatthethirdandfourthflooroftheAcehGovernors

    office is rented to the Acehbased USAID team (Majuddin, n.d.). Thirdly,

    althoughtheCalangMeulabohsectionhadbeencontractedtoJICS,theUSAIDs

    interferencetoshortcutthesocalledhorseshoehasnotreceivedanyresistance

    fromtheWestAcehandprovincialgovernments.

    (f). Hence, it is extremely important to study USAIDs links to large US

    companies,

    which

    have

    already

    invested

    their

    capital

    in

    Aceh,

    or

    are

    in

    the

    processofbiddingforlargebusinessdeals.Inthatlightonehastoseetherecent

    openingofabrandnewpolytechnicinstituteinBandaAceh,financedbyajoint

    US$10billionbudgetoftheUSAIDandoneofthe largestoilcompaniesinthe

    world, namely ChevronTexaco, or Chevron, called the Vocational Training

    Alliance forAceh.Thegroundbreaking ceremonyof thispolytechnic institute,

    whichwilloccupysevenhectaresoflandintheUleeKarengsubdistrictinBanda

    Aceh,tookplaceonMonday,April23,2007,andwasattendedbyAcehDeputy

    GovernorMuhammadNazar andBandaAcehMayorMawardiNurdin. This

    jointventurewasprecededbyaUSAIDChevronjointprogram to trainyoung

    personsfrom

    Aceh

    and

    Nias

    at

    the

    Caltex

    Polytechnic

    School

    in

    Pekanbaru,

    Riau

    (SiaranPersKedubesAS,April29,2006).AsthenUSAmbassadorB.LynnPascoe

    stated inPekanbaru,after the firstgroupof132AcehandNiasyouth finished

    their training:ThepartnershipbetweenUSAIDandChevron reflecteda long

    term investment for AcehNias economy (BRR daily news on

    http://www.brr.go.id/,Thursday,August10,2006).Hence, it isnotunlikely that

    Chevron ispaving theway toopen theirownoil andgasmining activities in

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    19/26

    - 13 -

    Acehwiththesupportoftheirpartner,USAID,especiallyafterthediscoveryof

    the huge hydrocarbon reservenortheast of Simeulue island (Serambi Indonesia,

    February12,2008).

    (g).A largeUS companywithmuch closer links toUSAID, as far asAceh is

    concerned, is Parsons Global Service Inc. This company,based in Pasadena,California,USA,hasbeencontracted todesignand supervise theBandaAceh

    MeulabohroadforUS$34.9million.As theresearch teams internetsearchhas

    shown,thiscompanyhasalsobeensubcontractedbyUSAIDinvariouspostwar

    andpostdisastercountries,suchasinIraq,whereParsonsreceivedacontractof

    $500million,includingUS$240milliontobuild150primaryhealthcare(PHC)

    clinicsthroughoutIraq.However,twoyearsafterthecontractwasawarded,the

    Special InspectorGeneral for IraqReconstruction (SIGIR), an independentUS

    governmentagency,issuedareportwhichstatedthatParsonshadreapedaUS$

    3.3million

    profit,

    although

    US$

    70

    million

    worth

    of

    expensive

    medical

    equipmenthadnotbeendeliveredtothePHCs,whilemostofthePHCshadnot

    beenbuilt yet or hadbeen rejected due to poor quality (Moses 2004;Mandel

    2006;Chatterjee2007). Hence,itisamazingthatdespitethisnegativereputation,

    USAIDhasstillcontractedParsonsGlobalServicesInc.toplanandsupervisethe

    constructionof theBandaAcehMeulaboh road,whileParsons themselves are

    theoneswhoneedtobesupervised.

    (h).Fromtheinterviewsthathavebeenconductedbytheresearchteamandby

    analyzingpriorlanduseplansintheBubonBay,itseemsthattheAcehUSAID

    team,whoareveryclosetotheauthoritiesinBandaAceh,alreadyknewofplanstobuildnewharborsintheBay,andthatthoseplanscouldonlybeexecutedif

    theKualaBubonvillagehasbeenremoved.Thesefollowingeventsshow those

    indicators:

    (h.1.). When Christine, whom at one stage was recruited as a surveyor by

    USAID, visited the village area onJanuary 18, 2007, five stilted houseswere

    alreadycompletedandshowntothesurveyor,whorecordedtheboundariesof

    KualaBubonslandwithherGPSdevice.Thispersonadmittedthatbythattime

    theAceh

    USAID

    team

    had

    hoped

    that

    all

    the

    Kuala

    Bubon

    villagers

    would

    have

    followed thedistrict governments appeal to relocate toCot Seumereung. She

    also stated to the community leaders that she would raise the communitys

    concern about the USAID plan to build the road across the village to her

    superiors inBandaAceh,However, ina followupmeetingwithRoyVentura,

    theUSAIDAcehRoad Team Leader, at theUSAIDAceh office onMarch 11,

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    20/26

    - 14 -

    2007,VenturastatedthatChristineisnolongerworkingfortheAgencyandthat

    shedidnothavetherighttosayanythingonbehalfofUSAIDatthattime.

    (h.2.).WhenotherUSAIDsurveyorscametoKualaBubontoconductsounding

    tests to determine the soils strength to carry theburden ofbridges or other

    buildings,theydidituntiladepthof50metres.YEUsengineerwhowasatthe

    sitetosupervisetheconstructionofthestiltedhousesaskedthesurveyors,why

    they did the sounding so deep, because usually 15 metres is deep enough.

    Unfortunately,hedidnotreceiveasatisfactoryanswer.Bythattime,theUSAID

    surveyorscouldseethatfiveexemplaryhouseshadalreadybeenbuilt,andthe

    constructionhadalreadybegunforthe113otherhouses.

    (h.3.).Accordingtooneinformant,ayearbeforethe2004tsunami,asoiltesthad

    alreadybeencarriedoutbycertainparties tobuildanewharbor in theBubon

    riverdelta,

    more

    or

    less

    where

    the

    newly

    rebuilt

    Kuala

    Bubon

    village

    is

    located.

    The testwas carried outby a teacher of the local engineering high school in

    Meulaboh,andwasofquitehighstandards.

    (h.4.).Before the2004 tsunami, thenearbyLhokBubonvillageat thenorthern

    endoftheBubonBayhadharboredspecialships(tankers,asthelocalpeoplecall

    them),carryingthecrudepalmoil(CPO)producedbyPTKaryaTanahSubur,a

    member companyof theAstraAgroLestariGroup,whichhas a 5,000hectare

    palm oilplantation inWestAceh.After the tsunami,PTKTSmoved itsCPO

    export

    to

    the

    Ujung

    Karang

    harbor

    of

    Meulaboh,

    which

    has

    been

    rebuilt

    with

    Singaporean aid. It is not unlikely that the business community on Acehs

    westerncoastisinterestedinfinancingtheconstructionofanewandlargerCPO

    portintheBayarea,sinceinadditiontoPTKTS,anothercompany,PTBosowa

    Megapolis isopeninganewpalmoilplantation in thePangasubdistrictof the

    neighboringAcehJayadistrict.

    (h.5.).The(national)DepartmentofMarineandFisheryhasalreadyannounced

    planstobuildanewfishauctionsite(TPI)andfisheryharborinSuakTimahat

    the southern end of the Bubon Bay,with abudget of 15billionRupiah. This

    informationfirst

    came

    from

    the

    Panglima

    Laot

    of

    Samatiga

    subdistrict,

    who

    is

    alsoaKualaBubonvillager,duringourFGD inKualaBubononJuly21,2008,

    andhasbeenverifiedby threeother informants inMeulabohandBandaAceh

    duringthecourseofourfieldresearch.

    (h.6.).TwoinformantsinMeulabohalsoinformedtheresearchteamaboutplans

    tomovethecurrentferryharborfromUjungKaranginMeulabohtotheBubon

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    21/26

    - 15 -

    Bay. Ferries from this port daily transport passengers, vehicles, and other

    merchandisefromMeulabohtoSinabangontheislandofSimeulue.Reportedly,

    another15billionRupiahhasbeenallocated for thisproject,although itsexact

    locationintheBubonBayisstillunknown.However,withthediscoveryofhuge

    hydrocarbon reserves northeast of Simeulue by German and Indonesian

    geologists,which couldbe seen as ablessing indisguise of the 2004 tsunami

    (Serambi Indonesia, February 12, 2008), marine traffic between Simeulue may

    increasetremendouslyandthenewferryportwillhaveanincreasinglystrategic

    value.

    (h.7.).Finally, in the comingyears theremayemergeadditionalpressure from

    the mining sector to build or expand the existing harbours of West Aceh,

    especiallyfromthegoldminesintheSungaiMassubdistrict,wheregoldmining

    hastakenplaceontheupperstretchoftheWoylaRiver,withtraditionalaswell

    asmodern

    techniques,

    for

    the

    last

    two

    decades.

    (i). Last but certainly not least, the Kuala Bubon villagers themselves have

    attemptedtoutilizeallpeacefulwaystodefendtheirrightstorebuildtheirown

    livelihoodaccordingtowhathasbeentheirtraditionfordecades,namelyfishing

    andbuildingandrepairingfishingboats.First, theyappealedforsupport from

    theWestAcehdistricthead(Bupati)andthedistrictparliament(DPRK=Dewan

    PerwakilanRakyatKabupaten).WithlettersofsupportfromtheBupatiandDPRK

    of West Aceh, they have gone to see the Provincial Parliament (DPRA), the

    Governor

    of

    Aceh,

    the

    Aceh

    Nias

    Rehabilitation

    &

    Reconstruction

    Coordination

    Body(BRRNADNias),theUNcoordinatingbodyforNGOs(UNORC),andthe

    USAIDAcehRoadTeamLeader, allwithout any significant result.Hence, on

    July 12, 2008, the village leaders sent letters of complaints to thePresident of

    Indonesia, Soesilo Bambang Yudhoyono, and to the National Human Rights

    Commission (Komnas HAM).Whilewaiting for an answer from thePresident,

    theyhave invitedKomnasHAM commissioners tovisit theirvillage,beforeor

    afterthefastingmonth,Ramadhan.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    22/26

    - 16 -

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The followingconclusionsarederived from the findings in theprevious

    section:

    (1).Intheiranxietytoputasignatureontheirsupportforthereconstructionof

    Aceh,theUSAgencyforInternationalDevelopment(USAID)hasintroducedthe

    NorthAmericanhighwaysystemintotheprovince,withoutapriordebateabout

    the appropriateness of the Eisenhower system of highways into a different

    country, with a completely different history and culture, and without an in

    depth study into the impact of road improvement to trafficbehavior. By this

    careless introductionof theEisenhowerhighwaystyle inAceh, theUSAIDand

    itscorporatepartner,namelyParsonsGlobalServicesInc.,havebehavedlikean

    elephant in a china store, creating hundreds ofjobs forNorthAmerican and

    othernon

    Acehnese

    consultants

    and

    business

    people,

    without

    considering

    the

    BerlinWalleffect,and,in thespecialcaseofKualaBubon,theadverseimpact

    on efforts to revitalize the maritime and coastal culture of Acehs coastal

    villagers.

    (2).Thereluctanceofnationalgovernmentofficials torecognizeGAMsvictory

    intheprovincialanddistrictelectionsbywithholdingAcehsprovincialbudget

    for the lastsixmonths.Thishasforced theprovincialgovernment tosearchfor

    alternative financial sources andhas turned toUSAID and other international

    agencies

    as

    the

    major

    financial

    supporters

    of

    the

    Aceh

    provincial

    government.

    This financial dependence on the USAID hasbeen quite detrimental for the

    peopleofKualaBubon,aswellasforothervillagersalongtheUSAIDfinanced

    northwestern road, since their appeals for support andunderstanding of their

    ownelectedleadersoftenfallondeafears.Thisexaggeratedsenseofgratitudeto

    USAIDhasblinded theprovincialbureaucratseyes to theuniquecontribution

    made by the people of Kuala Bubon in rebuilding their community by

    revitalizingtheircoastalandmarineculture,asrequiredbytheLoGA(LawNo.

    11/2006ontheGovernmentofAceh)andbytheAugust15,2005,MoUbetween

    theGovernmentofIndonesiaandtheFreeAcehMovement.

    (3).Ourresearchhasalsoshownthatplayerswithdiverseeconomicinterestsare

    eagertowipeKualaBubonoffthemap,sothattheexistenceofthatvillagewill

    nothinderseveralplanstobuildspecialharborsalongtheBubonBay,including

    a ferry harbor to transport commuters and other passengers from the Aceh

    mainland to the island of Simeulue, which may becoming a new economic

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    23/26

    - 17 -

    June 2008 : daily activities, children and women enjoyed their neighbourhood in Kuala Bubon

    growthcentreafterthediscoveryofhugehydrocarbonreservesnortheastofthe

    island.

    (4).Just likebaby turtleswhohavegrownupafter reaching thesea, theKuala

    Bubonpeoplehaveshowntheirresiliencetofightagainstanyattempttorelocate

    them away from their traditional waters. They have refuse tobe split by a

    highwaypassingthroughtheircommunity,whichlikeaBerlinWallwillpolarize

    villagers living onboth sides of the highway, and are eager to invite other

    villagerstojointheirstruggle.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    24/26

    - 18 -

    RECOMMENDATIONS:

    In response to those conclusions, the research teamoffers the following

    recommendations:

    (1). Obstruction of the national governments financial obligations to the

    Government of Aceh should be eliminated to avoid overdependence of the

    GovernmentofAcehtoUSAIDandotherinternationalaidagencies.

    (2).Theconstructionof theBandaAcehMeulabohUSAIDfinancedhighway

    shouldbe temporarilyput on hold,prior to apublicdebate regarding all the

    social, environmental and cultural impacts of the highway, inviting all

    stakeholders,andespeciallyvillagerslivingalong theroad,andhealthworkers

    who have dealt with casualties that have happened alongside the increasing

    speedand

    recklessness

    of

    drivers

    after

    every

    improvement

    of

    the

    road.

    (3).GovernmentauthoritiesinBandaAceh,aswellasotherpersonsinvolvedin

    theroadconstruction,shouldcomeandlivewiththepeopleofKualaBubonfor

    ashortperiodtobeabletodiscussandappreciatetheeffortstheyhavemadein

    rebuilding their livelihood and living in refugeebarracks, andunderstand the

    traumawhichtheywillexperienceifthecommunityisshatteredbytheUSAID

    plannedhighway.

    (4).

    Reconstruction

    of

    any

    war

    torn

    or

    disaster

    torn

    country

    or

    region

    does

    not

    absolve thegovernment fromhaving tobe transparentandaccountable toany

    developmentproject.Hence, thenationalandprovincialgovernmentshouldbe

    transparentonanyandallplanneddevelopmenteffortsintheBubonBay.Only

    fulltransparencyinthisfieldandareamaypreventfurtherspeculationaboutthe

    motivesbehindtheUSAIDsinsistenceonshortcuttingthesocalledhorseshoe

    roadaroundtheBubonBay.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    25/26

    - 19 -

    Bibliography:

    Chatterjee, Pratap (2007).High-Tech Healthcare in Iraq, Minus the Healthcare. Specialto CorpWatch, January 8.

    Majuddin, Akhiruddin (n.d.).Meneropong Bantuan Berbalut Konsesi di Aceh.

    Mandel, Jenny (2006). Report details problems with contract for Iraq health centers,

    govexec.com, May 1.

    Moses,Greg(2004).LivefromPasadena:SilhouttesofNewOrder.CounterPunch,

    March29.

    PuthutEA(ed.)(2007a).MenyusunSerpihanCerminRetak:MelihatDariDekat

    PenangananBencanaAlamdiAcehdanNias.Yogyakarta:YAKKUM

    EmergencyUnit

    (YEU).

    PuthutEA(2007b).LewatBatasLuka:LembaranKisahyangHampirTertutup.

    Yogyakarta:YEU.

    Syarif,SanusiM.(2003).RiwangULaot:LeuenPukatdanPanglimaLaotdalam

    KehidupanNelayandiAceh.BandaAceh:YayasanRumpunBambu.

  • 8/14/2019 Working Paper INFID 2008 = USAID vs Kuala Bubon

    26/26

    Address: Jalan Mampang Prapatan XI No.23 Jakarta 12790 IndonesiaPhone (6221) 79196721, 79196722, Fax (6221) 7941577

    Email:[email protected],www.infid.org