annualreport
DESCRIPTION
report on cementTRANSCRIPT
Mrs. Vinita Singhania, President, CMA
(From October 2009)
Past Presidents of Cement Manufacturers’ Association
Shri Dharamsey M. Khatau 1961 to 1964
Shri G.D. Somani 1965 to 1967
Shri V.H. Dalmia 1968 to 1969
Shri R.D. Shah 1970 to 1973
Shri P.K. Mistry 1974 to 1976
Shri A.K. Jain 1977 to 1978
Shri R.P. Nevatia 1979 to 1980
Shri S. Krishnaswamy 1981 to Aug’82
Shri V.L. Dutt Oct’82 to Oct’83
Shri J.R. Birla Nov’83 to Mar’87
Shri M.H. Dalmia Mar’87 to Jul’89
Shri M.N. Mehta Jul’89 to Jul’91
Shri N. Srinivasan Jul’91 to Aug’94
Shri M.C. Bagrodia Aug’94 to Sep’96
Shri N.S. Sekhsaria Sep’96 to Jun’98
Shri A.L. Kapur Jun’98 to Mar’99
Shri Y.H. Dalmia Mar’99 to Aug’99
Shri M. Karnani Aug’99 to Oct’00
Shri T.M.M. Nambiar Oct’00 to Oct’02
Shri B.L. Jain Oct’02 to Sep’04
Shri N. Srinivasan Sep’04 to Dec.06
Shri Manoj Gaur Dec’06 to Jul’07
Shri H.M. Bangur Jul’07 to Oct’09
INDIAN CEMENT INDUSTRY: SOME GIANT STRIDES
� Indian Cement Industry ranks the Second largest amongst cement producing countries in the World.
� Produces Cements following mandatory international standards and matches the World’s best in Quality.
� Added a Capacity of 37 mn.t. in 2009-10.
- Highest ever added in any single year.
� Set up Capacities abroad – West Asia, China.
� Average annual kiln capacity of +2860 tpd is the Second highest in the World after Japan (3370 tpd).
� Achieved World Class Energy Efficiency.
India’s
Best
World’s
Best
Electric Energy – kwh/t of Cement
63 65
Thermal Energy –KCal units/ kg. of Clinker
665
650
� Particulate Emission levels meet stringent International standards of 50 mg/Nm3.
- In some cases even lower : 15 – 20 mg/Nm3.
� The Cement Industry is Country’s largest consumer of hazardous wastes viz. Fly Ash and Blast Furnace Slag as part of its environmental concerns.
� As a part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), the Cement Industry is intensely involved in environmental protection through creation of large expanses of social forestry, extensive water bodies, voluntary adoption of neighboring villages in providing free Water, Electricity and facilities for Education, Healthcare etc.
� The Industry is Capable of Scaling even greater heights of National Achievements for better and enlarged Service to the Society with support from the Government on following fronts :
o Availability of indigenous coal at rational price through traditional linkage
o Adequate and assured logistics support, particularly Railways, the economical mode for transport of Cement and other Inputs.
o Rationalization of Taxes and levies to make Indian Cement Industry more competitive both in Domestic and also in International markets.
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION
PRESIDENT
Mrs. Vinita Singhania
VICE PRESIDENT
Shri M.A.M. R Muthiah
MEMBERS OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE
Shri Sumit Banerjee
Shri J Datta Gupta
Shri Ramit Budhraja
Shri D.S. Ghai
Shri Ravinder Mohan (Upto Oct.09)
Shri J.C. Toshniwal
Shri S.N. Toshniwal
Shri Ajay Kapur
Shri Kamlesh Sharma
Shri Harsh V. Lodha
Shri B.R. Nahar
Shri Rajendra Chamaria
Shri Alok Patni
Shri Puneet Dalmia
Shri Saurabh Misra (Upto 31.3.2010)
Shri O.P. Puranmalka
Shri B.L. Kalwar
Shri T.S. Raghupathy
Shri R. Srinivasan
Shri Rakesh Singh
Ms. Rupa Gurunath
Shri Sunny Gaur
Shri R.G. Bagla
Shri S. Chouksey
Mr. Farooq Ahmad Wani /
Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad Malik
Shri Anant Prakash Sinha
Mrs. V.L. Indira Dutt
Shri K.C. Jain
Shri Uday Khanna
Shri Kamal Kishore
Shri P.S. Bakshi
Shri Bhagwat Pandey
Shri Alok Sanghi
Shri M.S. Gilotra
Shri M.K. Singhi
Shri Aditya Shriram
Dr. M. Rajaram, IAS/
Shri G.A. Rajkumar, IAS
Shri Ratan K. Shah
Shri K.C. Birla
Shri Krishna Srivastava
PERMANENT INVITEES
Shri H.M. Bangur
Shri Manoj Gaur
Shri N. Srinivasan
Shri B.L. Jain
Shri Y.H.Dalmia
Shri M.N. Mehta
Shri M.H. Dalmia
Shri V.L. Dutt
SECRETARY GENERAL
Shri N.A. Viswanathan
i
FOREWORD
The 49th Annual Report of CMA for the year 2009-10 is in your hands. The
Report reviews various aspects of performance of Cement Industry during the period
under Report.
India is one of the few countries, which could survive global recession with minor
bruises and has demonstrated its resilience with GDP growth registered at 7.5%
from the low of 6.7% in the previous year.
Industrial production growth, which touched a low of 2.8% in 2008-09 from 8.5%
recorded in 2007-08 recovered to post a double-digit growth of 10.4% in the year
2009-10. The manufacturing sector too witnessed a double-digit growth of 10.3%,
more than 3-times the growth recorded in 2008-09 at 2.7%. However, Agriculture
sector recorded a dismal growth of 0.2% during the year 2009-10.
The Cement Industry, which exhibited resilience in the face of the global financial
meltdown by sustaining a near 8% growth (7.9%), during 2008-09, jumped up to
record a double-digit growth of 12.7%, in 2009-10.
A notable feature which bears highlighting is the addition of a capacity of 37 mn.t in
the Cement Industry during the year 2009-10, which is the highest capacity ever
added in any single year so far.
This high growth performance of the Cement Industry during 2009-10 was largely
helped by the increased construction activity in infrastructure catalysed by stimulus
packages provided by the Government.
The Union Budget 2010-11 has given further thrust to infrastructure development
with increased financial allocation to various programmes including construction of
roads, urban and rural development projects, mass housing etc. The
Commonwealth Games (CWG), 2010 have also generated additional demand for
Cement for development of Infrastructure like Stadia for Games, Housing for large
number of Athletes, Coaches and others, Concrete Roads and Metro Rail for
connectivity of various locations to give a facelift to the National Capital Region.
These measures should boost the demand for Cement and the Cement Industry is
expected to sustain a 12% growth during FY11 and the next few years.
ii
The Working Group on Cement Industry for the XI Plan has projected cement
production at 269 mn.t and the capacity needed at 298 mn.t by the terminal year of
the Plan i.e. 2011-12. The Cement Industry, which has added a capacity of 88.7
mn.t during the first three years (2007-10), is optimistic that it would reach the
target of 298 mn.t capacity by 2011-12.
One of the main concerns of the Cement Industry is availability of required
quantities of coal, the main fuel. During the year 2009-10, CMA’s delegation had
meetings with and also made representations to Secretary and Additional Secretary
of Ministry of Coal (MOC), Chairman, Standing Linkage Committee (SLC), Chairman
and Director (Mktg.) of Coal India Ltd, Secretary and Director, Deptt. of Industrial
Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Secretary
(Coordination), Cabinet Secretariat drawing their timely attention to the problems of
Cement Industry and seeking their cooperation and guidance in finding solutions.
Concerned at the deterioration in the quality of coal being supplied to Cement
Industry, CMA conducted an internal survey and found that coal supplied in most of
the rakes contain one to four grades below the billed grade. Coal companies have
been requested to (i) consider re-grading of coal to appropriate levels, (ii) have a
suitable mechanism to compensate for the monetary loss occasioned due to supply of
lower grade coal against billed grade and (iii) ensure in future that coal supplies are
subjected to joint sampling if desired so by the buyer, so that the quality of coal
supplied is determined for each consignment. It is hoped that coal companies will
take appropriate action.
Cement being a high-volume and low-priced commodity, Railways is the ideal mode
of transportation for Cement. CMA continued to draw attention of the Senior Officers
of the Railways, including its Chairman and Hon’ble Minister of Railways to the
Rail-related problems being confronted by the cement plants and also suggested
possible remedial measures to overcome them. A number of representations were
made to Senior Officials of Railways, Secretary and Joint Secretary, Deptt. of
Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry as also
Secretary (Coordination), Cabinet Secretariat.
CMA continued its efforts to promote greater and more widespread use of cement
during 2009-10. Presentations on advantages of Cement Concrete Roads were
made to the concerned officials of State and Central Government, Municipal
Corporations, Heads of Development Corporations, PWD Engineers, etc. in various
States of the country.
iii
Some of the notable Presentations include those made to Hon’ble Chief Minister of
Delhi, Smt. Sheila Dikshit, Director General (Road), Ministry of Road Transport and
Highways (MORTH), Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Transport and Building,
Hyderabad, Vice-Chairman, Kanpur Development Authority and President,
Maharashtra Economic Development Council (MEDC) and Seminar on “Sustainable
Cost-Effective Options for Road Pavements” and “White Topping of Concrete
Roads” was organized in association with Indian Concrete Institute, Hyderabd and
UltraTech Cement Ltd., for Chief Engineers and other Stakeholders.
Your Managing Committee is happy to report that the promotional efforts have borne
fruits and the Government of Rajasthan have issued instructions that majority of
Roads in the State should be constructed in Cement Concrete. State Government
construction agency of Karnataka also issued instructions that most of the Roads
built by the agency would be in Cement Concrete. Government of NCT of Delhi
have decided to construct around 200 km. of Roads in Concrete. Government of
U.P. have sanctioned construction of internal roads in Cement Concrete and the KC
drains in 2195 villages and allocated Rs. 850 Crores for the same.
Even under the PMGSY, Karnataka Government has sanctioned 176.49 km. of
Cement Concrete Roads. The work on these is in progress in the Districts of
Hassan, Shimoga, Haveri and Belgaum.
During the year, CMA developed a Software for effectively comparing the cost of
Cement Concrete Roads and Bitumen Roads over a wide spectrum of criteria
covering various locally available inputs and their costs at different locations. The
Software has been circulated to all our Members and Stakeholders who evinced
interest in the Software. The exercise was undertaken to counter the myth that
Concrete Roads are always costlier in comparison to the alternative of Bitumen
Roads. It is hoped that this Software should help Construction Agencies to work out
quickly comparative cost advantages and encourage construction of Cement Concrete
Roads.
One of the notable developments in the Cement Industry during the year, related to
the achievement made through modernization and expansion which resulted in
operational efficiency, process control and energy conservation in the new plants,
with adaptability to use a wider range of alternative or substitute raw materials, and
fuels including those derived from a variety of Industrial Wastes.
Successful trials of using Waste Derived Fuels (WDF) by Member Companies in
collaboration with State Pollution Control Boards, CPCB and advanced technological
iv
institutions like GTZ German Technology Corporation, provided encouraging results
which led to MoEF recommending Cement Kiln as the most environment-friendly
mechanism for recycling four types of hazardous combustibles, namely, Shredded
Tyres, Paint Sludge, TDI Tar Waste, and ETP Sludge.
Deptt. of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, has
been highly supportive of our Industry for which I am grateful to Hon’ble Minister,
Secretary, Joint Secretary, Director and Under Secretary. I am equally indebted to
Secretary (Coal), Addl. Secretary (Coal) and Chairman, SLC, Joint Secretary,
Ministry of Coal; Chairman, Railway Board, Member Traffic, Additional Member
(T), Additional Member (C), Executive Director Traffic Transportation (S), Executive
Director Traffic Transportation (R), Ministry of Railways; Secretary, MORTH,
Chairman, NHAI, Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests; and Chairman,
Central Pollution Control Board, for their esteemed counsel, continued assistance
and steady support. I also thank the Senior Officers of various Ministries, Coal India,
Singareni, DGFT, for their cooperation.
I also wish to thank Senior Members of the Managing Committee and various other
CMA Committees for their valuable advice.
The Officials and Staff of CMA under the supervision and guidance of Secretary
General, Shri N.A. Viswanathan turned in yet another year of quality work with
utmost dedication and I would like to place on record my appreciation of the same. I
am sure that the Secretariat would continue to work with same zeal supporting the
Industry.
New Delhi (Vinita Singhania)
August 2010 President
1
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION
49th ANNUAL REPORT 2009-10
(Under Rule 49 - Rules & Regulations of CMA)
The Managing Committee is happy to
present its 49th Annual Report for the
year 2009-10.
THE YEAR AT A GLANCE
Economy
The Indian Economy, which witnessed
a slowdown during the year 2008-09
with GDP dropping to 6.7% due to
global financial meltdown that
affected the growth of several
countries severely, moved on the
recovery path and clocked 7.5%
during the year 2009-10. GDP growth
is expected to return next year to 9%,
a level that was sustained during the
three years 2005-08.
Industrial production recorded an
appreciable growth of 10.4% during
2009-10, more than three-and-a-half
times the growth registered in the
previous year at 2.8%.
Manufacturing sector also showed a
double-digit growth of 10.3%, more
than three times that recorded in
2008-09 at 2.7%.
Agriculture sector, which showed a
dismal growth of 0.2% during 2009-
10, is likely to fare better in 2010-11
due to the expected better monsoon
this season.
Construction sector posted a growth
of 8.6% in 2009-10 as against 8.8%
of the previous year.
On the External Trade, there has been
a negative growth, both in Exports
and Imports during the year 2009-10
compared to the previous year. While
Exports dropped by 3.8%, Imports fell
by 7.1%.
Foreign Exchange Reserves, which
showed a negative growth of 19.3%
in 2008-09 at US$ 241.4 billion
reversed the trend to record a positive
growth of 4.7% to reach US$ 254.7
billion in 2009-10.
Cement Industry
The Cement Industry that withstood
the global financial meltdown and
recorded a 7.9% growth during the
year 2008-09, a drop of just 0.2%
from the previous year’s growth of
8.1%, when the economic growth
plunged to 6.7% against a sustained
growth of 9% during the previous
three years, jumped up to record a
growth of 12.7% in 2009-10, on the
2
back of increased infrastructure
projects and other construction
activities supported by the Stimulus
Packages provided by the
Government. Cement consumption,
in fact, recorded a growth of 13.1% in
2009-10.
Outlook: Cement Industry
The main drivers of cement demand
are development of infrastructure like,
Power Houses, Roads, Ports, Airports,
and Mass Housing, both urban and
rural.
The Union Budget 2010-11 presented
by Hon’ble Finance Minister Shri
Pranab Mukherjee on 26th February
2010, with its emphasis on inclusive
growth, has focussed on infrastructure
development and pronounced several
proposals to facilitate such growth.
Some of the proposals of the Budget,
which will have a bearing on the
Cement Industry are cited below:
� Rs 1,73,552 crore provided for
infrastructure development, which
accounts for over 46 per cent of
the total plan allocation.
� Allocation for road transport
increased by over 13 per cent from
Rs. 17,520 crore to Rs 19,894
crore.
� Plan allocation for Power Sector
excluding RGGVY doubled from
Rs.2230 crore in 2009-10 to
Rs.5,130 crore in 2010-11.
� Rs. 66,100 crore provided for
Rural Development.
� An amount of Rs.48,000 crore
allocated for rural infrastructure
programmes under Bharat Nirman.
� Unit cost under Indira Awas Yojana
increased to Rs.45,000 in the plain
areas and to Rs.48,500 in the hilly
areas. Allocation for this Scheme
increased to Rs.10,000 crore.
� Allocation for Urban Development
increased by more than 75 per
cent from Rs.3,060 crore to
Rs.5,400 crore in 2010-11.
� Allocation for Housing and Urban
Poverty Alleviation raised from
Rs.850 crore to Rs.1,000 crore in
2010-11.
� Scheme of one per cent interest
subvention on housing loan upto
Rs.10 lakh, where the cost of the
house does not exceed Rs.20 lakh
- announced in the last Budget -
extended up to March 31, 2011
and Rs.700 crore provided for this
scheme for the year 2010-11.
� Rs.1,270 crore allocated for Rajiv
Awas Yojana as compared to
Rs.150 crore last year.
49th Annual Report
3
Hon’ble Minister for Road Transport
and Highways has been continuously
reviewing construction of highways,
having set a target of 20 km. per day.
Though the achievement against this
target has been low at around 7 km.
per day, the thrust has given further
momentum to increase the speed of
construction of highways.
The ensuing Commonwealth Games
(CWG) in October 2010 have
triggered enhanced pace in overall
development of the National Capital
Region (NCR) and Hon’ble Chief
Minister of Delhi has assured
construction of 200 km. of concrete
roads in Delhi. The Delhi Metro Rail
Corporation speeded up construction
of Metro Rail lines to provide
connectivity in Delhi and its
surroundings to facilitate smoother
and faster movement of people.
CMA has also been promoting
concrete road construction by
organizing meetings and
presentations with Municipal
Corporations and other concerned
Government agencies in different
States.
Further, the Real Estate growth has
picked up and housing projects are
progressing not only in major Metros
but also in the next Tier-II cities. In
fact, realizing that many of the
housing projects by prominent
builders are out of reach for many a
working class aspirant, thus resulting
in a large percentage of houses
remaining unoccupied, TATAs have
come out with Special Schemes, to
provide housing at affordable
economic prices in Mumbai city. Such
schemes are likely to be emulated in
other Metros and Tier-II cities also.
The thrust being given by the
Government for the development of
infrastructure, which lags very much
when compared with even developing
countries like Malaysia, and the focus
on inclusive growth by providing
supportive schemes for rural
economic development, should
certainly spur cement demand and
the Cement Industry is expected to
grow by more than 12% during the
next few years. As such the growth in
2009-10 has been 12.7%.
In fact, with the Government aiming
at an economic growth of around 10%
beyond the XII Plan period, Cement
Industry is expected to sustain even a
higher growth of 14 – 15%.
4
PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS – 2009-10* (Excluding Mini and White Cement Plants)
AT A GLANCE
• Capacity at the end of Mar'10 (Mn.t)
(Previous year 219.51 Mn.t)
: 215.78
- Addition in 2009-10 (Mn.t) : 36.98
- Growth, % ($) : 20.68
• Cement Production (Mn.t)
(Previous year 181.61 Mn.t)
: 160.74
- Highest ever in a month (Mar'10) (Mn.t) : 15.96
- Growth, % ($) : 12.68
Clinker Production (Mn.t) (Previous year 138.78 Mn.t)
: 128.28
• Capacity Utilization (%)
(Previous year 88%)
: 84
• Stock at the end of Mar'10
- Cement (Mn.t)
(Previous year 1.09 Mn.t) : 1.29
- Clinker (Mn.t)
(Previous year 5.48 Mn.t) : 6.29
- Highest Clinker Stock in Nov.09 (Mn.t) : 7.76
• Exports
- Cement (Mn.t)
(Previous year 3.20 Mn.t)
: 1.60
- Clinker (Mn.t)
(Previous year 2.90 Mn.t)
: 3.14
• Consumption (Domestic Despatches)
(Previous year 177.98 Mn.t)
: 158.25
• Per Capita Consumption (2009) (kg.) : 136
($) – Compared to corresponding data in the previous year.
Mn.t - Million Tonnes
* Refers to existing Members of CMA and excludes data of two companies that have discontinued
their Membership with CMA during 2009-10.
49th Annual Report
5
48th Annual Session Of CMA
21st October 2009
Shri Jyotiraditya Scindia, Hon’ble Minister of State for Commerce and Industry addressing the gathering at the Annual Session. Seated on dais (L to R) S/Shri N.A. Viswathan, Secretary General, CMA, H.M. Bangur, President, CMA and Mrs. Vinita Singhania, Vice President, CMA.
Shri H.M. Bangur, President, CMA delivering Welcome Address. Seated on dais (L to R) S/Shri N.A. Viswathan, Secretary General, CMA, Jyotiraditya Scindia, Hon’ble Minister of State for Commerce and Industry, and Mrs. Vinita Singhania, Vice President, CMA.
Sectional View of participants at the Annual Session.
6
48th Annual Session Of CMA
21st October 2009
Shri H.M. Bangur, President, CMA presenting Memento to Chief Guest, Shri Jyotiraditya Scindia, Hon’ble Minister of State for Commerce and Industry.
Mrs. Vinita Singhania, Vice President, CMA showing photo gallery on Indian Cement Industry to Shri Jyotiraditya Scindia, Hon’ble Minister of State for Commerce and Industry.
Shri Jyotiraditya Scindia, Hon’ble Minister of State for Commerce and Industry releasing a book “Construction, Maintenance and Upkeep Of Concrete Buildings” on the occasion.
49th Annual Report
7
Addition of Capacity
A capacity of 36.98 mn.t has been
added during the year 2009-10, the
Third Year of the XI Five Year Plan. Of
this, around 54% (19.85 mn.t) was
through greenfield projects while
expansions accounted for 46% (17.13
mn.t).
Thus the capacity added during the
first three years of the XI Plan was
88.70 mn.t which forms 75% of the
projected capacity addition during the
XI Plan period (2007-12).
The Cement Industry is confident that
it would reach the capacity of 298
mn.t (Including Mini Plants) targetted
by the Working Group on Cement
Industry for the XI Plan by the end of
2011-12. Details of capacity added
during 2009-10 are given at
Annexure-I.
Cement and Clinker Production
Cement production by Members of
CMA during the year 2009-10 was
160.74 mn.t, against the production
of 142.65 mn.t of the same Members
in the last year 2008-09, posting a
growth of 12.7%. Company-wise/
Unit-wise production and performance
may be seen in Annexure-II.
Clinker production by Members of
CMA during the year 2009-10 was
128.28 mn.t, against the production
of 112.66 mn.t of the same Members
in 2008-09 indicating a growth of
13.9%.
Clinker stock in March 2010 was 6.29
mn.t against the previous year’s 5.48
mn.t.
Details of Performance of Cement
Industry during 2009-10 – Large
Plants, Large Plants and Mini and
White Plants and Region-wise
Capacity and Production are reflected
in Annexure-III.
MEETINGS OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE AND HIGH POWER COMMITTEE
Three meetings of the Managing
Committee and nine meetings of the
High Power Committee were held
during 2009–10 to review the
industry’s problems and performance.
CMA COMMITTEES
To help address various emerging
issues and find solutions to the
problems affecting Cement Industry,
the following Committees continued to
render assistance to the Management
of the Association during the year
2009-10:
� CMA High Power Committee.
� CMA Committee on Coal Matters.
� CMA Technical Committee.
o Energy Task Force.
o Environmental Task Force.
8
� CMA Finance/ Legal Matters
Committee.
� CMA Committee on Railway
Matters.
Names of the Chairmen/Co-chairmen
of the above Committees are
indicated in Annexure-IV.
PRE-BUDGET MEMORANDUM
In our endeavour to highlight the
various measures required for the
healthy growth of the Industry so that
these could be considered in the
formulation of the Union Budget, CMA
submitted its Pre-Budget
Memorandum for the year 2010-11 to
the Hon’ble Finance Minister on 13th
November 2009, to help sustain a
healthy growth of the Cement
Industry. The proposals/suggestions
put forward in the Pre-Budget
Memorandum include –
� Uniform rate of Excise Duty on
Cement.
� An Abatement of 55%, as
recommended by NCAER in their
Report of 2005.
� Zero Import Duty on Coal, Pet
Coke, Gypsum &
other Inputs.
� Alignment of rate of VAT in line
with Steel.
� VAT or Cenvat Credit on Limestone
Royalty and Duty/Cess on
Indigenous Coal.
The Memorandum urged the
Government to consider our
submissions and help this core sector
Industry sustain 10% plus growth so
as to be able to meet the country’s
requirement of cement for developing
infrastructure, most needed for the
country’s economic development.
A delegation led by President, CMA,
Mrs. Vinita Singhania, also met the
Finance Ministry officials on
15.12.2009 and made a detailed
presentation on various aspects that
needed to be considered by the
Finance Ministry for sustained growth
of the core sector Cement Industry.
This was preceded by a detailed
Presentation and discussions with the
Secretary (Revenue) and other Senior
Officials on this issue a few days
earlier.
POST BUDGET MEMORANDUM
After the announcement of the Union
Budget on 26th February 2010, CMA
submitted a Post-Budget
Memorandum to the Hon’ble Finance
Minister on 12th March 2010.
While appreciating the Govt. for the
proposals addressed that would help
boost cement demand, particularly
49th Annual Report
9
those pertaining to the development
of infrastructure and coal availability,
the Memorandum also drew the
attention of the Govt. to the proposals
that would have an adverse impact on
the performance and growth of the
Cement Industry.
The Memorandum included the
following:
� Abatement of 55%, as
recommended by NCAER in their
Report of 2005, be given to the
Cement Industry on Excise Duty.
� Withdrawal of Excise Duty on
Petroleum Products.
� 3% Service Tax on Rail Freight,
which is already high, be not
levied.
� The levy of Clean Energy Cess on
Coal, Lignite and Peat may kindly
be withdrawn and that if,
however, this additional Cess is
imposed, it may kindly be made
MODVATable, since there is
already a heavy dosage of cess
burdens.
� The Service Tax proposed to be
levied on Housing Construction be
kindly withdrawn, shelter being
one of the most basic and priority
human needs.
INCREASE IN INPUT COSTS OF CEMENT
During the year 2009-10, there have
been increases in costs of inputs for
cement manufacture on items such as
wages, power, petroleum products,
royalty on limestone etc.
INFRASTRUCTURE
The core sector Cement Industry,
which provides the main
infrastructure for development of
infrastructure like roads, housing,
ports, airports, etc. depends on three
main inputs viz. Coal, Railways and
Power.
While coal is the main fuel and power
is essential for all the major
operations of the plant, Railways
provide the logistics support for
transportation of coal from distant
coalfields, gypsum and other inputs to
the cement factories and outward
movement of cement from factories to
distant markets/consumption centres.
All the three sectors, which provide
key infrastructure inputs for the
Cement Industry, are in the public
sector on which the Industry has no
control. In the following Sections the
performance of these three crucial
infrastructure supports to the Cement
Industry have been dealt with.
10
Coal
During the year 2009-10, CMA had
regular interaction with various Govt.
authorities on coal-related issues such
as, Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs),
Sanction of Long-term linkages,
Problem in complying with the
specified Milestones as per LOA, E-
auction, Allocation of captive blocks,
Coal Imports, Quality of coal and
stepping up of coal supplies to
Cement Industry. CMA’s delegation
had Meetings with, as also made
representations to Secretary, Ministry
of Coal, Additional Secretary, Ministry
of Coal, (MOC), Secretary (DIPP),
Ministry of Commerce and Industry,
Director (DIPP), Chairman, Standing
Linkage Committee (SLC), Secretary
(Coordination), Cabinet Secretariat
and Chairman, Coal India Ltd (CIL)
and Director (Mktg.), CIL for getting
timely attention to the problems
of Cement Industry and finding
solutions.
The more important issues
relating to coal availability are :
Coal Receipt Against FSA/Linkage
Member Units of CMA received
only 10.78 mn.t of coal in 2009-
10 as against FSA/Linkage of
13.56 mn.t. Month-wise receipts
are given in Annexure-V.
Total Coal Procurement and Consumption
In addition to the coal received
against FSA/linkage, the Members, for
meeting their fuel requirement, also
procured imported coal, pet coke,
lignite and coal from open market for
use in the Kilns and Captive Power
Plants (CPPs). The total fuel
procurement by Member units was
26.24 mn.t in 2009-10 as against
23.39 mn.t in 2008-09.
Details of coal receipt against
FSA/linkage, open market purchase,
import of coal, lignite and pet coke
procurement and consumption of fuel
by Member units are given in
Annexure-VI. The trend of fuel
consumption and receipts are shown
in the graph.
14.25
10.06
15.03
10.45
14.98
9.61
13.98
8.24
15.42
9.01
15.37
9.74
15.81
11.09
17.83
12.35
18.85
13.35
21.21
14.84
22.39
14.81
25.02
14.43
27.33
14.56
29.57
14.29
25.80
10.78
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
95-96
96-97
97-98
98-99
99-00
00-01
01-02
02-03
03-04
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
Actual Fuel Consumption
Receipt against Linkage
Year
Mn
.t.
The drop in 2009-10 is due to discontinuation of Membership by two cement companies, whose data is not included.
49th Annual Report
11
The total fuel consumption, by
Member units, during the year 2009-
10 was 25.80 mn.t [18.90 mn.t in Kiln
and 6.90 mn.t in CPPs].
It will be observed that during the
year 2009-10, while the coal supply
through FSA/Linkage was only 10.78
mn.t, the total fuel consumption of
the Member units was 25.80 mn.t,
leaving a gap of 15.02 mn.t between
the actual requirement and supply. In
percentage terms, the linked coal
supply was only 41% of the total fuel
consumption during the year
2009-10.
Coal Imports
The coal imported by Member units
was 6.95 mn.t during 2009-10. The
trend of coal imports is shown in the
graph. The rate of import duty,
continues at 5% since 2006-07.
Pet Coke
The main source of supply of
pet coke is presently refineries
at Jamnagar [Reliance
Industries Limited (RIL)] and
Panipat [Indian Oil Corporation
(IOC)]. Some quantities of Pet
coke are also being imported
from US Gulf. Duty on
imported pet coke, however, remains
at 5%.
Member units consumed 3.76 mn.t of
pet coke in 2009-10.
Lignite
During the year under review,
marginal quantity (0.13 mn.t) of
Lignite was used as fuel by the
Member cement companies in
Southern and Western Regions. Some
quantities of Lignite are likely to be
used in future too.
Beneficiation/Blending of Coal
With the passage of time, the overall
quality of available coal has been
deteriorating. To counter this
problem, there is a need to
beneficiate the coal to upgrade the
quality for using in the kilns. Some
cement units are resorting to blending
1.30
1.65
3.52
4.66
6.04
4.40
3.37
3.66
3.18
3.63
3.40
4.96
6.08
6.97
6.95
0
2
4
6
8
10
95-96
96-97
97-98
98-99
99-00
00-01
01-02
02-03
03-04
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
Import of Coal
Year
Mn
.t.
The drop in 2009-10 is due to discontinuation of Membership by two cement companies, whose data is not included.
12
of higher grade/imported coal
with the domestic coal to
upgrade the quality. Cement
plants are also getting their raw
coal washed in private
washereis located in the
jurisdiction of coal companies
particularly SECL, WCL & SCCL.
It may be recalled that as per
the latest policy of Government,
all new coal projects with
capacity of 2.5 mn.t and more
should have washeries as an integral
part.
Quality of Coal
In the context of continued
deterioration in the quality of coal
being supplied to Cement Industry, an
internal survey was done in the CMA.
As per this exercise, the coal supplied
in most of the rakes was found to
contain one to four grades below the
billed grade. Coal Companies have,
therefore, been requested to
(i) supply proper quality of coal to the
cement plants, (ii) consider re-grading
of coal to appropriate levels, (iii) have
a Mechanism to compensate for the
monetary loss sustained by the
cement plants, and (iv) ensure that in
future the coal supplies be subjected
to joint sampling, if so desired by the
buyer, so that actual quality of coal is
determined for each consignment.
We hope, the coal companies will take
appropriate action in this regard.
Coal Loading by Rail
Average loading of linked coal, for
entire Cement Industry, during the
year 2009-10, was 1086 wagons FW
per day, as against 1030 FW per day
in 2008-09 i.e. an increase of 56 FW
per day over last year.
Captive Coal Blocks
The Screening Committee of Ministry
of Coal (MOC) has allotted coal blocks
to some Member Cement Companies.
However coal production is yet to
start.
E-Auction
The New Coal Distribution Policy
(NCDP) provides that the FSAs
between Cement Industry and the
Coal Companies will be signed for
75% of the normative requirement of
the Cement plants. The actual supply
will, however, be still lower. The
cement plants have, therefore, to
825
799
731
525
605
670
809
785
891
1055 1100
1079
1086
1030 1086
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
95-96
96-97
97-98
98-99
99-00
00-01
01-02
02-03
03-04
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
Coal Loading
YearF
w/D
ay
49th Annual Report
13
procure coal from open market
including E-auction. It has been
reported by the Member units that the
per tonne cost of E-auction coal is
very high; at times, almost twice the
notified price of coal, adding
substantially to the cost of cement
production.
Supply of Imported Coal to New
Consumers
NCDP provides that in case the coal
companies are not able to supply
indigenous coal against the FSA
quantity, the shortfall would be made
good by the coal company by
supplying imported coal. CMA had
earlier requested Coal Companies that
the consumer should have the liberty
to decide on procuring imported coal
through the Coal Company or import
directly. This issue was considered by
CIL, and CIL has now agreed to allow
the consumers the option of
surrendering imported coal supply. In
other words, a consumer may not
take the imported coal from Coal
Companies. In such cases, the FSA
through Letter of Assurance (LOA)
route will be signed for only 50% of
the entitled quantity for supplying
indigenous coal.
Delay in the Signing of FSAs
through LOA Route
The Long-Term Linkage Committee
Meetings held on 20th November
2007 and 20th March 2008 authorized
the coal companies to issue LOAs to a
large number of cement plants and
CPPs.
As per NCDP, the coal supplies to
these units can commence only after
the FSAs are signed and the FSAs
would be signed only after the
prescribed Milestones, as enunciated
in the LOA, are achieved.
There are 16 Milestones for cement
kilns and 11 for CPPs which are to be
completed by the LOA holders.
Documents/papers are required to be
submitted against each of the
Milestones. Although the LOA holders
complied with the requirements of
most of the Milestones, there are still
cases where cement plants are facing
insurmountable and practical
problems in furnishing the documents.
CMA had, therefore, represented to
Chairman CIL in May 2009 for making
necessary modifications in the
requirements of some of the
Milestones. The issue was
subsequently discussed in a meeting
between CMA representatives and
Director (Mktg.) CIL and his team at
New Delhi on 20th July 2009.
This issue of delay in signing FSAs
was also discussed in the Meeting of
Secretary, Co-ordination on 21st May
2009. Secretary, Co-ordination
advised DIPP to discuss the issue with
MOC/CIL for expediting the signing of
FSA. Accordingly, Director DIPP had
14
two Meetings with CIL and CMA
Representatives on 6th July 2009 and
22nd July 2009 in this regard.
It is understood that the CMA’s
request is being duly considered by
CIL/MOC for making modifications in
the requirement of some of the
Milestones.
CMA has again taken up the matter
with concerned authorities requesting
that after the modifications in the
requirement of Milestones are notified
by CIL, the process of signing of FSAs
could commence.
CMA, however, has also pointed out
that there will be some cases where a
few cement plants may not be in a
position to submit a few documents
exactly in the manner as required in
the LOA and/or as approved by CIL
Board, for the reasons beyond their
control. For such cases, it has been
suggested that a Review Mechanism
may be put in place under a Senior
Officer of the Coal Company to
resolve these issues. At least 3
months’ time should be allowed to
complete the revised Milestones after
these are notified. For cases falling
under Review Mechanism, the period
of 3 months be reckoned after the
issues are resolved.
CMA has also requested that the BG
(Bank Guarantee) submitted by
Cement Plants against Commitment
Guarantee (CG) should not be
encashed till FSAs are signed. CMA
has further requested that the
modifications agreed for Cement
Plants may be made applicable to
CPPs as well.
Sanction of Long Term Linkages of Coal to New Capacities
Cement Industry has been given the
task of meeting the overall cement
requirement of the country. In fact,
Cement Industry is expected to
sustain a double-digit growth during
the next few years. Though geared to
fulfil the task, the Industry’s realizing
this target would depend upon the
adequate availability of coal, which is
the most important input. Most of the
cement companies have applied for
sanction of long-term linkages of coal
to MOC/ SLC (LT). Unfortunately,
these applications are still pending for
consideration.
The last two SLC (LT) Meetings,
pertaining to cement sector, were
held on 20.11.2007 for kilns and
20.3.2008 for CPPs. No SLC (LT)
meeting has been held since then. All
new capacities are facing serious
problems regarding allocation of coal.
CMA has taken up the issue with the
MOC/DIPP a number of times to
convene an early meeting of the SLC
(LT) so that the new capacities start
getting coal at the earliest.
49th Annual Report
15
Discontinuation of SLC (ST) – Alternative Mechanism in Lieu
Thereof
As mentioned in the last Year’s Report
i.e. 2008-09, in the last SLC (ST)
Meeting held on 19th December 2008
it was indicated by Chairman SLC
(ST)/Special Secretary, MOC that in
view of the fact that the bilateral
FSAs, as per NCDP, are now in place
to govern the coal supplies to Cement
Industry, there is no need to have
these quarterly meetings for deciding
the coal movement programme and,
therefore, it would be the last meeting
of SLC (ST) and, if necessary, a
smaller alternative mechanism may
be created in lieu of SLC (ST).
Considering the usefulness of this
forum, CMA took up the matter with
Chairman SLC (ST) and Special
Secretary (Coal), Secretary (Co-
ordination) and Secretary DIPP.
Notwithstanding our repeated
request, the system of holding SLC
(ST) meeting was discontinued.
Neither was an alternative
mechanism put in place as
assured by Coal Ministry.
CMA was, therefore, pursuing
with MOC to introduce an
alternate mechanism in place of
SLC (ST) expeditiously to bridge
the vacuum. However, MOC has
now finally notified that SLC
(ST) having been discontinued,
the coal supplies to Cement
Industry will henceforth be governed
as per the bilateral Fuel Supply
Agreements between the Cement
Plants and Coal Companies.
TRANSPORTATION - RAILWAYS
During the Year under review
(2009-10), the overall supply position
of wagons to the Cement Industry
was much lower than the requirement
of the Industry. The severe despatch
problems, being experienced by the
cement plants, were further
aggravated when Railways had
started diverting wagons to Fertilizer,
Foodgrains and Power sectors. This
had badly disrupted the loading of
cement, clinker and coal by Rail,
despite Industry’s best efforts to
increase the cement loading by Rail.
Partly as a result of this, Rail share
(as a %age to the total despatches)
has dropped by 2% in case of cement
and 1% in case of clinker over last
Year (see Bar Charts below).
Cement Despatches
85.86
100.42
3.04 2.58
53.3356.85
35.5637.50
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2008-09 2009-10
Mn
.t.
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60%
ag
e
Rail Road
Sea Rail share %age
Year
16
CMA continued to draw the attention
of the Senior Officials of the Railways,
including its Chairman and Hon’ble
Minister of Railways to the Rail-
related problems being confronted by
the cement plants and also their
possible remedial measures to
overcome them.
Cement loading: During the Year
2009-10, cement despatches by
Member Companies by Rail were
56.85 mn.t, out of the total
despatches of 159.85 mn.t. These
companies have despatched 53.33
mn.t by Rail, out of their total
despatches of 142.23 mn.t during
2008-09, a growth of 6.6% in cement
loading by Rail on YOY basis.
However, when cement despatches by
Rail are compared with the total
despatches of cement, there has been
a drop of about 2%.
Clinker loading: During 2009-10,
Member Companies despatched 25.65
mn.t of clinker. Out of this, 14.23
mn.t of clinker was moved by
Rail i.e 55.48%. During 2008-
09, total clinker despatches by
these companies were 20.15
mn.t and the despatches by
Rail were 11.37 mn.t i.e
56.43%. Although growth in
Clinker loading by Rail has gone
up by 25.2% in 2009-10, it has
declined by 1% when compared
to the total despatches of
clinker.
Cumulative Despatches (cement +
clinker): During 2009-10, the
overall cumulative despatches of
Member Companies were 185.50 mn.t
as against 162.38 mn.t during 2008-
09, a growth of 14.2%.
Cumulative Despatches by Rail
(cement + clinker): During 2009-
10, total despatches by Rail were
71.08 mn.t as against 64.70 mn.t last
year, a growth of 9.9%.
Year-wise details of Cement and
Clinker despatches by Rail/Road/Sea
for the period 1992-93 to 2009-10 are
given at Annexure-VII.
CMA Committee on Railway Matters
In the last one year, the CMA
Committee on Railway Matters, under
the Chairmanship of Shri Kamal
Kishore, met seven times to discuss
Clinker Despatches
5.31
14.23
11.37
7.99
3.47 3.43
56.43
55.48
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2008-09 2009-10
Mn
.t.
45
50
55
60
65
70
%a
ge
RailRoadSeaRail share %age
Year
49th Annual Report
17
HIGHLIGHTS - RAILWAY BUDGET 2010-11 RELEVANT TO CEMENT INDUSTRY
� No increase in the freight tariff.
� A Modified Wagon Investment Scheme for high capacity general purpose
and special purpose wagons to be introduced.
� Private operators to be permitted to invest in infrastructure and run
special freight trains.
� Acquisition of 18000 Wagons.
� A New Scheme “House for All” to be launched, to provide residences to all
Railway employees in the next ten years with the help of Ministry of Urban
Development.
� To set up about 522 hospitals and diagnostic centres, 50 Kendriya
Vidyalayas, 10 residential schools on the pattern of Navodaya Vidyalaya,
Model degree colleges and Technical and Management Institutions of
national importance to benefit Railway employees and their children.
various Rail-related issues and also
evolve strategies and action plans for
taking up these issues with concerned
Authorities.
Representations/ Presentations
A number of Representations/
Presentations were made to senior
officials of the Railway Board,
including Hon’ble Minister of Railways,
Chairman, Member (Traffic),
Executive Directors and Chairman,
Rail Cement Co-ordination Group. In
addition, representations were also
addressed to Secretary and Joint
Secretary, DIPP, Ministry of
Commerce and Industry and
Secretary (Coordination), Cabinet
Secretariat soliciting their support for
resolving the problems being
experienced by the Industry.
Railway Budget 2010
CMA in its reactions to the ‘Railway
Budget 2010', inter alia, brought to
the notice of the Hon’ble Minister of
Railways the acute despatch problems
being faced by the Cement Industry
due to short supply of wagons and
requested her that Cement Industry,
which is the third largest customer
and also revenue earner for Railways,
be put on par with Foodgrains,
Fertiliser and Power Sectors insofar as
allotment of wagons is concerned.
Hon’ble Minister was also requested to
consider restoring the Classification
Slabs for cement, clinker and coal to
their prior level i.e. 140 from the
present slab of 150.
18
Meetings with Railway Officials
In the last one year, representatives
of the Cement Industry and the
Members of the CMA Committee on
Railway Matters had 4-5 meetings
with senior officials of the Railway
Board, including its Chairman and
Members. These meetings were also
attended by senior officials from the
Zonal Railways.
During the meetings, the issues that
were currently impacting the Cement
Industry, their possible remedial
measures, future pattern of cement
loading and the industry’s
expectations from the Railways were
raised by CMA. These are detailed
below:
a) Acute Shortage of Wagons :
It was suggested that Railways
may ensure regular and
guaranteed supply of wagons,
including Box-N wagons and
two point/ multi point rakes to
the cement plants, throughout
the year, which would go a long
way in Railways achieving the
250 mn.t of cement loading by
2020.
b) BCN-HL Wagons : Officials of
the Railway Board have been
informed of the practical
problems being faced by the
Cement Plants in loading 4000
tonnes of Cement in rakes of
BCN-HL Wagons and have
requested them to consider
enhancement of free time,
option of multi-point rakes and
waival of penal demurrage and
wharfage charges till the
Industry acquires adequate
confidence in handling them.
c) New Scheme of Wagon
Investment : The new
Scheme may provide for
procurement of BCN and BOXN
wagons;
Wagons supply position at
existing level is required to be
reasonably established and
guaranteed on a rotating
average, besides additional
rakes linked with procurement;
Freight concession may not be
limited to Return On
Investment with interest but
should be available for the
entire life of wagons i.e. 35
years; and
Obligation for procurement of
additional rake may be kept
flexible, as each rake would
cost around Rs 18-20 Crores.
d) Bulk Transportation: There
is a huge untapped opportunity
available for transportation of
49th Annual Report
19
cement in bulk through special
purpose wagons. The present
Rail movement of bulk cement
is around 2% of total installed
capacity in the country.
However, due to increasing use
of Ready Mix Concrete and
consumption of Bulk cement, it
is likely to go upto 20% in the
next few years. To facilitate
such growth, the following
suggestions were made to the
Railways:
i. Separate tariff classification
for Bulk Cement or
alternately the discount
structure based on complete
life span of wagons;
ii. Discount/Rebate should be
based not only on the
investments made on the
procurement of wagons but
also on the investments
made for creation of
necessary infrastructure
facilities for handling bulk
cement. Further, this may
be reviewed every alternate
year, taking into account the
inflation cost and the
prevailing freight rates; and
iii. Engine-on-load facility for all
types of wagons and doing
away with engine hiring
charges.
e) Round-The-Clock Woking
Hours: It was requested that
Railway Board may consider
prescribing feasible and
practical unloading hours since
round-the-clock working hours
for unloading are not feasible
due to constraints related to
infrastructure and labour
availability and to avoid
unnecessary demurrage and
wharfage charges being paid by
the Cement Plants to the
Railways.
f) Development Of Terminals :
It was suggested that Railways
may consider allocating suitable
funds for the development of all
major terminals. Further, the
urgent need to find out new
locations in and around the
Metro cities for developing new
terminals so that increasing
arrival of cement in Metros
could be handled efficiently,
was also highlighted.
Workshop on Draft Policies
convened by Railways
At a Workshop convened by the
Railway Board on 17th April, 2010 in
New Delhi, CMA made certain
suggestions for incorporation in the
20
following Schemes proposed by the
Railways :
All the Policies that are proposed or
those in existence should be made
simple, clear and transparent to avoid
any mis-interpretation of the clauses
when it comes to financial matters.
In case of any dispute in
interpretation of the Policy, a mutually
acceptable solution should be found
out.
Since Cement Industry is the third
largest customer and revenue earner
for Railways, Railway Board may
consider bringing out a simple,
transparent and industry-friendly
Specific Policy for the Cement
Industry for movement of cement
(bagged/bulk); clinker, coal, fly ash,
gypsum, etc. This will go a long way
in Railways achieving the 250 mn.t of
cement loading target by 2020, as
projected by the Railways in their
Vision Document 2020.
Policy on Special Freight Train
Operator (SFTO)
I. Rail freight concession/rebate
should not be decided merely
on the investments made for
procurement of wagons. The
huge investments that are
needed for creating necessary
infrastructure facilities for
handling movement of fly ash,
etc. both at loading/unloading
points should also be
considered, while fixing
concession/rebate.
II. Looking to the colossal
investments that need to be
made by the SFTO, the freight
concession contract should not
be restricted to 20 years, or
extendable by another 10
years. Since these investments
will be made in the larger
interests of the Railways, the
Concession Contract with SFTO
should be made for the entire
life of the wagons i.e. over 35
years.
III. Minimum Guarantee of
Wagons/Rakes: Against each
rake procured, a minimum
guarantee for supply of 6 rakes
per month should be given.
This should be over and above
the average number of rakes
being received by the investor
in the last two financial years.
Policy on Development of Private
Freight Terminal
The stipulation in the Draft Policy
Paper that revenue sharing at the
then prevailing rate of terminal
charge leviable at the Railway goods
sheds, which is Rs. 20/- per tonne at
present, and also increasing revenue
49th Annual Report
21
sharing by indexing it to 90% in the
WPI increase, which is the inflation
figure, is very high and an unviable
proposition. This needs to be reduced
by at least 50% of the proposed
revenue sharing.
Your Managing Committee is hopeful
that Railways would consider
favourably all the suggestions of the
Cement Industry. Such a step would
not only increase the revenue
earnings of Railways from the Cement
Industry but also help execution of
various ongoing and future
construction projects on time, a major
thrust area of the Government.
POWER
Cement Industry is highly power
intensive. Most of the operations
depend on power. Cement Industry,
being a continuous process Industry,
a continuous and uninterrupted supply
of power is of a sine-qua-non.
Due to poor quality of power with
interruptions supplied by the State
Electricity Boards, most of the cement
units in different States have installed
captive power facilities, some for
100% of requirements.
As on 31st March 2010, the total
captive power generation capacity
installed in the Cement Industry was
2354(P) MW, of which 56% (1323
MW) is based on Thermal and 44%
(1031 MW) is based on Diesel. In
addition, wind farms of around 85 MW
have also been installed.
During the year 2009-10, cement
production with captive power was
around 59%.
JUTE PACKAGING FOR CEMENT INDUSTRY
During the Year under review, cement
continued to be out of the list of
commodities to be packed in jute
bags.
LEGAL MATTERS
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 876/2008
DG (NVESTIGATION &
REGISTRATION) VS. CMA & OTHERS
As reported last year, CMA filed an
Appeal in January, 2008 along with a
Stay application in the Supreme Court
of India against the “Cease & Desist”
Order dated 20.12.2007 passed by
MRTP Commission, praying that
pending hearing and disposal of the
appeal, the impugned Order dated
20.12.2007 of the MRTP Commission
in RTPE No. 99 of 1990 be stayed.
The CMA’s Appeal No. 876 of 2008
was tagged with other Appeals filed
by individual Member Companies in
the matter. The matter came up
(P) = Provisional
22
before the Apex Court on 8th
February 2008, which pronounced the
following Order:
“Permission to file appeal is
granted.
Issue notice in all the civil
appeals returnable after eight
weeks.
By way of interim relief the
following directions are stayed:
‘We further direct them
to file an affidavit of
Compliance of the above
directions within eight
Weeks of the
pronouncement of this
order.’ ”
The matter was listed before
Registrar, Supreme Court of India on
18th August 2009 to complete the
pleadings. The Registrar gave liberty
to the Respondents to file Counter
Affidavit within four weeks and
adjourned the matter.
No date for hearing in the matter has
yet been fixed.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2987/2008
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS’
ASSOCIATION VS. SARABJIT S.
MOKHA & ORS.
Members may recall, against the
MRTP Commission’s Order dated
29.02.2008 appeals were filed in the
Supreme Court of India by the
concerned Cement Companies (Satna
Cement Works, Lafarge, ACC, Grasim
and Maihar Cement). After hearing
the counsel on 16.4.2008, the Hon’ble
Court directed Issue of Notice and
stayed the directions to file Affidavit
of Compliance of “Cease & Desist
Order”. Court also ordered to tag this
case with Civil Appeal No. 686 of 2008
(filed by ACC).
In April, 2008, CMA also filed Civil
Appeal No. 2987/2008 in the
Supreme Court of India. Since CMA
was not required to file an Affidavit of
Compliance with the Commission, no
prayer for Stay on filing of Affidavit of
Compliance was filed by CMA. CMA
impleaded Shri Sarabjit S Mokha, Shri
Naresh Grover and concerned Cement
Companies (who were Respondents in
the RTPE No. 21 of 2001) as
Respondents. The Appeal was listed
for hearing on 9th May 2008. Upon
hearing the counsel, the Court made
the following Order:
“Issue notice to Respondents 1
and 2 only.*
Tag with Civil Appeal No. 2467
of 2008 etc.”
In October, 2008 Shri Sarabjit S
Mokha & Ors. filed an application for
vacation of stay in the SLP filed by
ACC Limited. Further, in December,
* S/Shri Sarabjit S. Mokha and Naresh Grover
49th Annual Report
23
2008 Counter Affidavit was filed on
behalf of Respondents No. 1 & 2* in
the matter of Civil Appeal no.
2987/2008 filed by CMA.
In September, 2009 CMA filed a
detailed Affidavit as Rejoinder to the
Counter Affidavit filed by Shri Naresh
Grover on behalf of Respondents
No. 1 & 2.
No date for hearing in the matter has
yet been fixed.
RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES
ENQUIRY NO.15/2007
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (I&R)
VS. M/S. BINANI INDUSTRIES
LIMITED & ANR.
As already reported last year, based
on the Preliminary Investigation
Report prepared by the office of the
DG (I&R) which inferred that Cement
Manufacturing Companies use the
forum of Zonal Marketing Committees
of CMA to decide the terms and
conditions of sale including prices
through cartelisation, MRTP
Commission had issued Notices dated
2.9.2008 under Section 10(a)(iv) of
the MRTP Act, 1969 to CMA and 14
other Cement Producers to file reply
within four weeks.
In November, 2008 CMA filed its reply
stating that CMA does not play any
* S/Shri Sarabjit S. Mokha and Naresh Grover
role in fixing the prices of cement,
marketing the cement and/or fixing
terms and conditions for sale of the
cement in market etc. Besides, it does
not have any authority either to do so
or to bind its members by directions
issued by it to sell cement at a
particular price only, and hence the
PIR against the CMA is untenable and
is liable to be dismissed.
In April, 2009 on behalf of DG (I&R) a
Rejoinder was filed to the reply filed
by CMA.
The matter was fixed for 20th October
2009 for framing of Issues.
In the meantime the Competition
(Amendment) Ordinance, 2009 was
promulgated repealing the MRTP Act,
1969 and the MRTP Commission
established under the repealed Act
stood dissolved. Hence from 14
October 2009 all cases pertaining to
Monopolistic Trade Practices or
Restrictive Trade Practices pending
before MRTP Commission got
transferred to Competition Appellate
Tribunal.
The matter was listed before
Competition Appellate Tribunal
headed by Hon’ble Justice Arijit
Pasayat on 12th March 2010. After
hearing the parties briefly, the
Ld.Judge was of the view that let the
pleadings and other formalities in the
24
matter be completed and that he
would take up the matter once the
same are completed. Accordingly, the
matter has been adjourned to 1st
October 2010 for further proceedings.
INTEREST ON DELAYED PAYMENT OF
ENHANCED ROYALTY ON LIMESTONE
There is no progress in the matter
during the Year under review.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (CCI)
It has already been reported in last
year’s Annual Report of CMA that the
Members resolved that every effort
would be made to ensure that the
charter of duties of CMA and
furnishing of information to various
authorities from time to time,
including materials for information on
parliament questions etc. should be in
consonance with the Competition Act.
CMA obtained independent opinions
from two well known legal experts,
Shri P.N. Bhagwati, Former Chief
Justice of India and Shri R.C. Lahoti,
Former Chief Justice of India in
October 2009 regarding the activities
of CMA including supplying a variety
of information to the Government
authorities.
Both the opinions categorically
validated CMA’s practices and
procedures and have endorsed that
there is no violation, whatsoever, of
the provisions of the Competition Act
in any manner either in collection of
data or in the information sharing, nor
is there any need to modify the
present procedure, reporting details
etc. and have advised continuing with
our activities.
A third independent opinion from M/s
Nishith Desai Associates, Legal and
Tax Counseling Worldwide, obtained
in October 2009 also concurs with
other two. A relevant part is quoted
below:
“… CMA does not solicit or
take part in any collusion
between the members on
the aspect of price fixing,
limiting production or any
of the prohibited activities
as prescribed under the
Competition Act. ……the
activity of the individual
members of merely
sharing information with
CMA, without any element
of collusive behavior inter
se them, should be a
permissible activity within
the aegis of the
Competition Act”.
M/s Nishith Desai Associates, in
addition, suggested amendments to
the “Memorandum and Rules and
Regulations of CMA” to make it
compliant with Competition Act. These
49th Annual Report
25
include (i) addition of Preamble (ii)
deletion of clauses 3(b), 3(g) and 3(j)
and (iii) amendments in clauses 3(d)
and 3(f) of objects in Memorandum of
Association and addition of clause
2(b) in Rules and Regulations. A
further suggestion had also been
made to include certain information
pertaining to activities of CMA on the
CMA Website.
While suggestions regarding inclusion
of the information on CMA’s Website
have been carried out, the changes in
“Memorandum and Rules and
Regulations of CMA” can be effected
only after due approval of the
Members at an Extra-Ordinary
General Meeting (EGM) followed by
another EGM within one month
confirming the change.
The above changes were approved by
Managing Committee at its Meeting
held on 30th November 2009. The
matter would be taken up at the EGM
to be held on 23rd September 2010 to
consider and approve the changes
suggested by the Managing
Committee.
COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON CEMENT SECTOR
As mentioned in CMA’s Annual Report
for 2008-09, the Study was awarded
to National Council of Applied
Economic Research (NCAER) on 31st
March 2009. A Draft Report of the
Study was to be submitted by March
2010. However, due to the
Consultancy firm not receiving the
required information from the
Members, the report has been
delayed.
As per the Terms of Reference, the
Study included an analysis of the non-
traded cement sale. A detailed
Questionnaire was prepared by the
Consultant for the purpose of eliciting
such data and was forwarded to the
cement companies. No response was
received even after a lapse of
considerable time. A meeting of the
officials of the group of Cement
Companies who were nominated to
look after the progress of the Study
was organized, and the Questionnaire
was revised to help expedite cement
companies in providing the data to
NCAER. The Final clearance for the
information in the revised
Questionnaire was given in last week
of May 2010. The Questionnaire has
been circulated again to Members and
the data has to be analyzed on receipt
of the filled in Questionnaire from all
the Members for inclusion in the Draft
Report.
The Consultant has indicated that he
expects to submit the Draft Report in
August 2010, subject to his receiving
the information sought in the
Questionnaire from all the Members
early as three months’ time would be
26
required for analysis and
interpretation of the results to be
included in the Report.
EXPORT
Indian Cement Industry could
commence Exports of Cement and
Clinker only after the Government
totally decontrolled Cement from
31.3.1989.
With a beginning of mere 0.16 mn.t in
1989-90, Exports reached a peak of
10.6 mn.t in 2004-05. However, the
following years witnessed a drop
partly due to market conditions, both
domestic and international, and partly
due to change in Government policies.
As also mentioned in last year’s
Report, there was a drop of 33% to
6.02 mn.t in 2007-08 from 9.00 mn.t
in 2006-07. Exports should have
further declined due to the ban
imposed on exports in April
2008 to improve cement
availability in the domestic
market. However, due to
various representations made
by CMA mentioning that the
ban on exports, while providing
an easy access to neighbouring
countries to grab the already
developed markets by the
Indian cement manufacturers,
could also lead to legal action
by foreign buyers if contracts
are not honoured timely, the
Government partially lifted the ban in
May 2008 by permitting exports to
Nepal and exports from Gujarat Ports.
The ban on exports was completely
lifted in December 2008.
It is only due to this total lifting of ban
on exports that there was a marginal
increase in exports in 2008-09 to 6.10
mn.t from 6.02 mn.t in 2007-08.
The year 2009-10 witnessed a drop in
exports to 4.74 mn.t. The drop is
partly due to the exclusion of data
from the two companies who have
withdrawn their membership from
CMA and partly due to competition in
the international market.
Country-wise Cement and Clinker
exports by Indian Cement Industry
during 2008-09 and 2009-10 are
given in Annexure-VIII.
5.98
3.18
5.89
3.11
3.65
2.37
3.20
2.90
1.60
3.14
0
2
4
6
8
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Cement and Clinker Exports
Cement Clinker
Year
Mn
.t.
9.17
6.106.02
9.00
4.74
The drop in 2009-10 is due to discontinuance of Membership by two cement companies, whose data is not included.
49th Annual Report
27
MARKET DEVELOPMENT
CMA continued its efforts to promote
greater consumption and more
widespread use of cement during
2009-10. CMA officials, on their own
and in conjunction with the
representatives of the cement
companies, held meetings with a large
number of Central and State
Government officials on the subject.
Meetings were also held with other
Authorities, such as Municipal officials,
Heads of Industrial Development
Corporations and Chief Engineers.
The emphasis, as in previous years,
was on the construction of cement
concrete highways, city streets and
rural roads throughout the length and
breadth of the country. Other uses of
cement, such as in concrete canal
lining and rural housing were also
discussed.
Presentations on the advantages of
cement concrete roads were made to
the above mentioned officials and
Authorities along with their Engineers,
Consultants, junior functionaries and
Contractors.
In addition to the above, discussions
were held, presentations made and
letters written to various Ministers
and other senior functionaries of the
Central and State Governments on
the subject of cement concrete roads.
All the above activities resulted in a
number of Cement Concrete Roads
being planned for and being
constructed. Broad details of action
taken and results obtained can be
seen at Annexure-IX.
Software for Cost Comparison, Concrete vs Bitumen Roads
During the last several years, while
promoting the construction of Cement
Concrete Roads, CMA and the
representatives of various cement
companies found that while long life,
low maintenance, environment and
user-friendliness, as well as other
superior characteristics of concrete
roads were readily accepted by almost
all concerned, the decision to build
Cement Concrete Roads instead of
Bituminous ones, was quite often not
taken, due to fears that the Concrete
Roads would be much costlier. CMA,
therefore, commissioned the
development of a software, which
could be used effectively to compare
the cost of cement concrete and
bitumen roads, over as wide a
spectrum of criteria, as was likely to
be met anywhere in the country.
The software was designed to cover
all types of roads and different types
of construction using various input
costs and life spans. Road design and
fixed costs were based on guidelines
28
laid down by the Ministry of Road
Transport & Highways.
The initially developed software was
studied and discussed during a
number of meetings, where valuable
inputs from representatives of the
Cement Companies were received.
The duly modified software
incorporating these suggestions was
finalized and distributed to all cement
companies, Nodal Officers and others
concerned.
Meeting with World Bank
A Meeting was held with the Senior
Road Specialist of the World Bank and
his staff in New Delhi, to discuss
utilization of World Bank funds for the
construction of Cement Concrete
Roads. CMA publications were
handed over to them.
On-Ground Costing of Concrete vs
Bitumen Roads
On our request, M/s. Jaiprakash
Associates Ltd. who are constructing
Bitumen as well as Cement Concrete
Roads, graciously provided CMA with
actual on-ground cost comparison of
the two pavement types. The same
was duly circulated to all cement
companies and Nodal Officers, as a
live Case Study.
Progress Achieved in States
As mentioned in the 48th Annual
Report (2008-09), CMA had requested
Cement Companies to appoint Nodal
Officers, to promote the construction
of cement concrete roads, in areas
they operated. Several companies
appointed such Nodal Officers.
Promotional efforts by Nodal Officers,
in conjunction with CMA officials have
achieved progress as given in the
following paras:
Rajasthan: Govt. of Rajasthan has
issued a letter on 29th September
2009 to the effect that, in future, the
majority of roads in the State should
be constructed in cement concrete.
Karnataka: On 28th July, 2009, the
Karnataka Land Army (KLAC), which
is a construction agency of the State
Govt., issued a letter which stated
that in future, most of the roads being
built by KLAC would be made of
cement concrete.
Apart from the above, the Karnataka
Govt. has sanctioned a 30 km long
cement concrete road at Shiradi Ghat.
Delhi: The Delhi Govt. has decided to
construct nearly 200 kms of cement
concrete roads in the near future.
Maharashtra: Nagpur and Nashik
Municipal Corporations have
49th Annual Report
29
undertaken construction of a large
number of concrete roads.
Tamil Nadu: Discussions were held
with several Chief Engineers with
regard to the construction of cement
concrete roads, in January 2010.
Uttar Pradesh: The Department of
Dr. Ambedkar Rural Development of
Government of Uttar Pradesh, vide
letter dated 29 October 2009 have
sanctioned construction of internal
roads in cement concrete and KC
drains in 2195 villages and allocated
Rs. 850 Crores for the same.
TECHNICAL MATTERS
The year witnessed many “Firsts” for
the Indian Cement Industry in widely
divergent fields. Prominent among
them are: (a) fastest [paced] annual
expansion of the Industry along with
accompanying high level
modernization through state-of-art
technology, (b) proactiveness of
statutory bodies in introduction of a
series of Regulatory standards on
environmental Protection, namely, the
Draft EIA (Environmental Impact
Assessment) Act of 14th September
2009, National Air Quality Monitoring
Act, January 2010; new standards on
environment-friendly mining practice,
namely, the New Mines and Minerals
(Development and Regulation) Act,
2009, the activities of the NAPCC
(National Action Plan on Climate
Change) and INCCC (Indian National
Conference on Climate Change) with
targeted thrust on energy-use based
sectors for reducing GHG emission in
fulfilment of India’s commitment to
United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in
abatement of escalating global
warming.
The Industry underwent unforeseen
capacity expansion of 37 mn.t during
the year, which is the highest in a
single year. The striking feature of
capacity expansion in the Industry
during the year, both in Greenfield
and Brownfield expansions, as well as,
in setting up new grinding units saw
adoption of larger capacity and latest
modernisation of kilns, mills and
grinding units than in previous years.
Through such modernization and
expansion, the Industry achieved
further notable improvements in
operational efficiency, process control
and energy conservation in new
plants. The five key areas where the
new generation plants excel from
those installed in earlier years are:
(a) Higher capacity utilization with
lesser downtime,
(b) Lesser thermal energy
consumption,
(c) Better electrical energy
efficiency,
30
(d) Lower and achievable minimum
levels of both gaseous and
particulate emissions, and
(e) Adaptability of plants to use a
wider range of alternative or
substitute raw materials, fuels
including waste derived fuels
and a long list of conceivable
industrial wastes.
In all these enumerated areas the
achievements of some of the new
generation plants have set
“Benchmarks” for other cement
producing countries in the World. Yet
another major hallmark achieved by
the Indian Cement Industry in the
year under reference has been a
larger rate of reduction by the
Industry in the Greenhouse Gases
(GHGs) emissions than in previous
years. The Industry also had a larger
contribution to Climate Change
Abatement and Sustainable
Development through larger volume
of recycling of major industrial wastes
like fly ash and Blast Furnace Slag in
cement production.
NOTABLE TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE
YEAR
Conventional Fuel Security and
Alternative Fuels
The alarmingly surging crisis in fuel
security prompted many member
companies to opt for co-processing of
alternate fuels. Successful plant trials
with varied Waste Derived Fuels
(WDF) undertaken during the last 4
years by several plants in
collaboration with the State Pollution
Control Boards and under the
supervision of CPCB provided highly
satisfactory results. Parallelly, CMA’s
relentless pursuit of the case with the
MoEF and CPCB bore fruits. As a
result, the MoEF Draft National Waste
Management Strategy uploaded in its
Website on March 26, 2009
recommended Cement kiln as the
most environment-friendly
mechanism for recycling four types of
hazardous combustibles, namely,
shredded tyres, paint sludge, TDI Tar
Waste, and ETP sludge. In further
follow-up of its earlier move to
facilitate co-processing waste plastics
in Cement kilns of Rajasthan and J&K,
the CPCB has, in consultation with
Cement Industry experts, brought out
recently (April 2010) a comprehensive
“Guideline on Co-processing Wastes in
Cement Industry”.
Status of On-Going Issues
During the year under review, the
Technical Committee pursued its
dialogue on several on-going issues
with a host of statutory bodies with
mixed results.
49th Annual Report
31
A. Bureau of Indian Standards [BIS] – Solution to Long
Pending Issues
Frequent intensive interactions
of the experts of CMA Technical
Committee with BIS led to
solutions to a number of long-
pending issues. A few
important issues raised or
proposals made by BIS which
had been dealt satisfactorily for
the Industry with assistance
from the Department of
Industrial Policy and Promotion,
Ministry of Commerce and
Industry are:
� Procedures for destruction
of Non-conforming/
substandard cement -
Guidelines provided for
environment-friendly
recycling as evolved by a
core expert group of the
Cement Industry, had been
accepted by BIS.
� Scope of acceptance of ISO
Final Draft International
Standards for Tests on
Setting time and fineness of
cement [views of Indian
cement manufacturers carry
weight, India being a
signatory to WTO
Guidelines] - Procedure
suggested by ISO has been
accepted by India on
voluntary basis, as an
alternative, on
recommendations from the
Indian Cement Industry,
and this suggestion has
been accepted by ISO.
� Revision of Indian Standards
on cement – OPC 33, 43 and
53 Grades – CMA’s several
recommendations including:
(a) to increase the
permissible SO3 content in
cement [from 2.5 to 3.5 %],
and (b) suggested revisions
in the STI (Scheme of
Testing and Inspection) for
cement etc. have been
admitted by the Specialist
Panel of BIS.
� Declaration of content
(percentage addition) of
additives (flyash, slag) in
cement bags – the logic of
the Cement Industry has
been admitted in
withdrawing this suggestion.
B. Issues with CPWD - Boost in Use of PPC after CPWD
lifting Ban
The Final Report of the DIPP
Sponsored Project with Central
Electrochemical Research
Institute, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu
32
(CECRI) on “Studies on
Durability of Concrete made
with Flyash Based Portland
Pozzolana Cements in
comparison to Concrete made
with Ordinary Portland Cement”
brought out several areas of
favourable performance of PPC
in comparison to OPC. With
the issue of the CPWD Circular
of 9th April 2009 close on its
heels, the decks have been
cleared for larger use of PPC,
and in addition, its use in
structural concrete also. Lifting
the ban on use of PPC has had
a tremendous impact on all
types of constructions including
on Ready Mixed Concrete
Industry for larger use of PPC.
A large number of joint-
collaboration Projects (between
major thermal power plants
and cement companies) for
setting up grinding units have
been achieved or are in the
final blue-print stage in many
parts of the country.
C. Issues with Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE)
The Bureau of Energy Efficiency
had embarked upon a new
scheme to formulate a National
Action Plan of competitive
promotion of “Energy
Efficiency” among the seven
major Industry and Service
sectors (Aluminum, Cement,
Power Generation, Petroleum
Refining, Petrochemicals, Steel
and Railways) comprising 128
“Designated Consumers”. The
essence of the proposed system
of monitoring and execution of
“Energy Efficiency” envisages
introduction of a PAT (Perform,
Achieve and Trade) Scheme.
Under this Scheme, each
Designated Consumer will be
assigned a target of energy
consumption reduction on
annual or periodic basis after
thorough study by a concerned
expert team of the entity. The
company/plant/consumer
achieving more than the jointly
agreed target (with BEE) will
earn credits for the excess
achieved beyond the target,
which will be equivalent to
tradable units on the basis of
the price of a kilolitre of fuel oil
at that time. This
company/plant/consumer can
trade the credits, partly or
wholly with another
company/plant/consumer
falling short of its designated
target during the same period.
The scheme is presently in the
stage of formulation of sector-
49th Annual Report
33
wise guidelines by BEE, which
will be finalized in consultation
with each sector. CMA, with its
nominated subject experts, is
very closely associated with
BEE in the formulation of this
scheme, which is expected to
come into force from 2011.
D. Issues with Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF)
During the year, the MoEF
issued a host of new
Notifications and Amendments
to earlier Notifications as
detailed below :
1. Environment Impact
Assessment, MoEF Gazette
Notification No.S.O. 195(E)
dated 19th January 2009.
2. Fly Ash Notification No.S.O.
2809 (E) dated 3rd
November 2009.
3. National Ambient Air Quality
Standards Notification GSR
826 (E) dated 16th
November 2009.
CMA had sent compiled
comments collected from
member companies on each of
them to MoEF.
Besides, Ministry of Mines and
Minerals had issued the Draft
Mines & Minerals (Development
& Regulations) Act by its
Notification No.16/57/2005-MVI
dated 5th August 2009 and had
discussed this Draft in detail
with all the stakeholders in a
two-day Workshop held in New
Delhi during 9th - 10th
October 2009.
The Clauses in these
Notifications seriously
impacting Cement Industry and
our comments sent to MoEF
and the Ministry of Mines are
given in Annexure-X.
E. Issues with Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB )
(a) Implementation of CPCB’s “Charter of Corporate Responsibility for Environmental
Protection” (CREP)
Polluting industries
(including core sector
industries, e.g., cement,
oil refining, steel etc) in
March 2003 concluded the
Fifth year of operation in
March 2008.
Present Status: The
pending items of CREP for
resolution are – ‘Evolving
Load based Standards’ (by
CPCB); ‘Evolving SO2 and
NOx Emission Standards’
34
(by CPCB and NCBM);
‘Development of
Guidelines for Control of
Fugitive Emissions in
Cement Plants’ (IIT and
NPC); ‘Preparing the
Policy on Use of Petroleum
Coke’ (by CPCB, NCBM,
BIS, Oil Refineries).
The pending activity
relating to “Development
of Guidelines for Control of
Fugitive Emissions in
Cement Plants” has been
executed satisfactorily in
association with cement
plants in all regions and
clusters. The Guidelines
were trimmed and
streamlined through
several discussion sessions
of the CMA Technical
Committee members with
NPC Executives and CPCB.
The Technical Committee
also organized Regional
awareness workshops in
all the regions and in
major clusters [CMA had
conducted 8 Workshops in
5 Regions (North, West-
Central, South, West and
East) and 3 Clusters
(Raipur, Chandrapur and
Nalgonda). 219 delegates
from 117 plants and
offices of cement
companies had attended
these Workshops].
(b) Hazardous Wastes (Storage, Handling and Trans boundary
Movement) Management Rules, 2009
The Rules promulgated to
act as facilitator for large-
scale recycling of
hazardous wastes,
particularly for co-
processing hazardous
combustibles in cement
kilns, has not yielded the
desired results. This is
mainly due to several
reasons, the more
significant of these are (a)
each state PCB interprets
the clauses in the Rules
differently, (b) Many
states do not permit
transboundary movement
of hazardous wastes for
use by a cement plant in a
neighbouring state, and
(c) the role of CPCB as
mediator, for solving
disputes between the
potential user and the
state PCB, has been found
to be ineffective in most
cases.
49th Annual Report
35
(c) Climate Change related Issues
The Copenhagen Summit
(COP 15) of UNFCCC held
in December 2009 had
planned a future course of
action for post-Kyoto
Protocol period beyond
2012 for mitigation of GHG
emission across the board
for all countries. Not yet a
legally binding Agreement,
the Summary Conclusions
in this summit envisage all
countries to reduce GHG
Emission by 15 to 20% in
course of 15 years (from
2005 to 2020). India,
being a signatory to Kyoto
Protocol has obvious
compulsions to follow the
conclusions both in action
and spirit, as declared in
the Summit by the Hon’ble
Minister of Environment
and Forests. The
Government of India has
taken up matching
measures for fulfilling the
obligations, and all sectors
of economy have been
advised to inventorise
annual GHG Emission and
adopt measures for its
progressive mitigation.
Inventorisation of GHG Emission by the Indian Cement Industry
Following the MoEF Report (May
2010) on “India: Greenhouse Gas
Emission 2007,” the Industry sector,
particularly the Energy Use sector,
plays a major role in GHG emission
Inventory of the Country. The Energy
Generation sector in India contributes
nearly 58% of GHG Emission, and the
Industry sector constitutes 22%,
Agriculture 17% and Waste Sector
3%. In the Industry sector, Cement
Industry contributes 6.8% of the total
GHG emission from India, followed by
the Steel Industry (6.2%). Cement
Industry has, therefore, a major role
to play not only in regular
inventorisation of GHG emission, but
also in its regular reduction.
CMA had initially taken part in the
NATCOM-I Project of the Government
of India under leadership of the MoEF
under the banner and fund support of
the UNFCCC. The NATCOM (National
Communication) Project is a
mandatory task for all developing
countries that are signatories to the
Kyoto Protocol, to provide UNFCCC
with annualized inventory of GHG
Emission. The NATCOM-I project for
India is a joint responsibility of a
clutch of Ministries related to GHG
Emission (Agriculture, forestry, fuel
use (coal and oil) , Mining, Power
36
generation and use, Transport, Health
and Family Planning, Urban
development etc) for GHG emission
inventorisation of all the sectors of the
Indian economy for the period 1990
to 2000. Under this project, CMA
provided the inventory of GHG
emission contribution from cement
and lime manufacturing and limestone
user industries for the aforestated
period. The Report from CMA had
been highly acclaimed by the MoEF for
its precision.
The 2nd Phase of NATCOM – II Project
of the Government of India envisages
GHG emission from all sectors of
Indian economy for the period 1995
to 2007 and CMA had been assigned
the task of GHG inventorisation for
the Indian Cement Industry and
limestone user sectors for the stated
period. The Project, which started in
January 2008 and had been initially
scheduled for completion by
December 2009, was subsequently
extended to June 2010. The Draft
Project Report prepared on the basis
of data provided through a structured
questionnaire by more than 87% of
Member Companies was presented to
the project authorities in March 2010
and was approved. The estimates by
CMA of GHG emission by the Indian
Cement Industry over the last decade
show marked decrease in the rate of
emission per tonne of cement. The
Final Report of all the sectors was
presented in the Meeting convened on
May 11, 2010 in New Delhi chaired by
the Hon’ble Minister of Environment
and Forests. After summing up of
presentations from different sectors
and conclusions derived, the status
regarding the Cement Industry stands
as follows:
1. The outlined Activity covers
extensive collection of data from
the Indian cement plants and
limestone use industries. Both
these industries operate in
organized and unorganized sectors
including small (and tiny) scale
outfits. The diversities in the scale
of operation, processes adopted,
and diversified products range led
us to conceptualize a flexible
model for data input and deriving
results for GHG Emission.
2. The Indian Cement Industry is a
complex combination of large, mini
and white cement plants. As on
31st December 2007, it comprised
136 major plants including 29
grinding units, 210 mini cement
plants (based on Vertical Shaft and
mini Rotary kilns) and 3 white
cement plants. The major plants
and white cement plants constitute
more than 97.5% of total capacity
49th Annual Report
37
and production and are spread
across 19 states.
3. The Questionnaire based data
collection Format, circulated
among all the 136 major plants
has so far elicited response from
119 (>87% of total cement
capacity in 2007).
4. Several anomalies and problems
were encountered in the course of
collecting and processing the data.
These are mainly (a) sourcing data
for years prior to 2000, (b) a good
number of plants or companies
shut down in late 90’s, (d) merger
and acquisition and change of
ownership of plants, (e) companies
and their owned plants (more than
40% of total capacity) affiliated to
WBCSD and following CSI
Protocol for a different system
(from UNFCCC) of data collection
and GHG Emission estimation, etc.
5. CMA developed a compatible
computerized software model for
feeding plant/Activity-wise, year-
wise input data (production, fuel
and power consumption, substitute
raw materials and fuel use) and
deriving results with the help of a
menu-driven module in the
software. It was formulated with
the algorithm of IPCC 2006
Guidelines for National Greenhouse
Gas Inventories, Tier-3 method of
calculation and, only in exceptional
and rare default cases, by applying
IPCC formula for Emission Factor.
At the same time, it is compatible
for CSI Module with some minor
additions or elimination.
6. The software model is dedicated
for estimation of CO2, NOx and SO2
emissions and also mitigation due
to use of alternative raw materials,
fuel, power (cogeneration, wind
power etc). The development of a
software compatible for all
different types of cement plants
and system of data inputs for
deriving GHG emissions took
considerable time and was ready
for use, after several trials and
cross-checks, only in end of
January 2010.
7. The Summary Results of the
current analysis are as follows:
(a) Cumulative GHG emission
from Process, fuel and power
use for large plants ranged
from 68.7 mn.t in 1995 for
62.08 mn.t cement production
to 142.89 mn.t for 164.45
mn.t cement production in
2007. The Year-wise
summary of Cement Emission
Factor shows a downward
trend from 1.106 tonnes CO2
eq in 1995 to 0.868 tonnes
CO2 eq in 2007 (Table-1).
38
Table - 1
Declining GHG Emission Trend in the
Indian Cement Industry (1990 –2007)
Year
Cement Production
(Million Tonnes)
Large Whole*
Plants Industry
GHG Emission
(Million Tonnes)
Large Whole
Plants Industry
Ratio
Cement : GHG
Large Whole
Plants Industry
1990** 44.87 53.84 1.20
1995@ 62.08 67.08 68.71 76.65 1.11 1.19
2000@ 95.95 102.20 89.15 98.89 0.93 0.97
2003@ 115.42 120.42 107.50 115.75 0.93 0.96
2004@ 125.07 130.57 115.33 123.49 0.92 0.94
2005@ 136.67 142.71 122.31 130.82 0.89 0.91
2006@ 152.99 158.99 132.61 141.66 0.87 0.89
2007@ 164.45 170.93 142.90 152.44 0.86 0.89
2007∋ 170.93 141.58 0.825
* Whole Industry includes Large, Mini and white cement plants
** Ref. CMA Report on NATCOM I -calculated for whole Industry
@ Ref. CMA Report on NATCOM II- calculated separately for Large, Mini and white cement plants
∋ Following NATCOM-II Guidelines, accounting for cement process & fuel use only.
(b) NOx and SO2 emissions data
could be collected from only
22 plants, as such
measurements had not been
regularly practised by most
plants till recently, because
the Norms for such emissions
were yet to be formulated by
CPCB. The year-wise volume
of these emissions have been
computed following IPCC
formula of 0.3 kg per tonne of
cement for SO2 emissions,
and EU Norms (3.5 kg per
tonne of cement) for NOx
emissions.
(c) Cogeneration-based power
generation in Indian cement
plants started in 2004. The
year-wise co-generated power
generation for the years 2004
to 2007 were computed and
equivalent GHG mitigation for
each of these years were
calculated adopting GHG
Emission factor reported by
CEA (Central Electricity
Authority), i.e. national
average of 1.1 t CO2/MWH.
The figures obtained show a
upward trend of mitigation
from 0.01 mn.t CO2 eq in
2004 to 0.08 mn.t CO2 eq in
2007.
(d) For limestone-use-based GHG
emission, National level data
were collected from the FIMI
(Federation of Indian Mineral
Industries) and IBM (Indian
Bureau of Mines). Year-wise
49th Annual Report
39
Limestone consumption data
by industries in the Organized
(Large Scale) Sector (Steel,
Paper, Fertilizer, Chemical,
Sugar, Aluminum, Foundry,
Glass etc) and also from
minor industries were
collected. The compiled data
were analyzed and GHG
emission in terms of CO2eq
for major industries and other
sectors were calculated.
The study also calculated the GHG
mitigation by major plants achieved
through substitution of clinker by fly
ash and slag in cement, and through
use of co-generated power and wind
power. The year-wise total mitigation
due to fly ash and slag substitution of
clinker shows progressive increase
from 4.1 mn.t in 1995 to 32.7 mn.t
in 2007. The details are provided in
Table-2 below:
Table-2
GHG Mitigation Activities by Major Plants of
Cement Industry: 1995 To 2007
No. Item/activity 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2004 2005 2006 2007
1. Fly Ash Consumed
(Million Tonnes)
2.01 2.41 2.54 2.67 3.6 4.35 12.81 17.11 23.23 29.97
2. Slag Consumed
(Million Tonnes)
2.59 2.75 3.00 3.03 3.74 4.32 5.55 5.64 6.96 7.73
3 Total of Flyash and
Slag Consumed
4.60 5.16 5.54 5.70 7.34 8.67
18.36 22.75 30.19 37.70
4 Mitigation from
clinker substitution due 3 above
4.153 5.655 5.878 5.688 7.251 8.054 16.927 20.338 26.144 32.723
5(a) -Cogeneration,
units, MWH
Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil 14347.40 64418 63971 75929
5(b) - Cogeneration, tonnes CO2 mitigation,
0.0158 0.071 0.07 0.0835
6(a) Wind Power generation-Capacity in MW
80.25 78.12 78.12 78.12 78.12
6(b) Actual Windpower
generated (MWH)
Load Factor range 22 to 44%:
Weighted Average 30% taken for all cases
0.210 0.205 0.205 0.205 0.205
6(c ) Mitigation-Wind
Power Generation (tonnes CO2)
0.231 0.226 0.226 0.226 0.226
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Carbon Trading
Indian Cement Industry continues to
enjoy its iconic status among all
cement producing countries of the
World in the number of registered
CDM Projects and Carbon credits
applied for or earned so far. At
present, the number of CDM projects
of different types and scales from the
Indian Cement Industry stands at 41.
Of these, 27 projects are registered
40
by the UNFCCC CDM Executive Board,
and the remaining are at different
pre-registration stages. These 41
projects are estimated to fetch the
Industry 29.55 millions of Certified
Emission Reduction (CERs) which is
equivalent to a reduction of 29.55
mn.t of CO2 over a 10 years’ crediting
period starting from the inception of a
particular project beyond the year
2000 as per the Kyoto Protocol Treaty
that expires in 2012.
The CDM market has been depressive
over the last two years particularly in
respect of new registrations due to
the dual effect of global economic
meltdown and fall in crude oil price.
Despite this, the Indian Cement
Industry continues to be a leader in
the global cement sector and scores
well above the rest of the world in
terms of project numbers and CER
volume.
CMA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE AND TASK FORCES
The Technical Committee and the Two
Task Forces held Four Joint Meetings
during the year (41st Meeting on June
20, 2009 [Hyderabad], 42nd Meeting
on 18th September, 2009 [Mumbai],
43rd Meeting on 29th December,
2009 [Kolkata], and 44th Meeting on
25th March 2010 (Delhi).
Representatives from plants in their
respective regions attended these
Meetings enabling thereby
dissemination of information and
discussion on technology-related
Regulatory issues and in reaching
convergent decisions.
TECHNOLOGICAL INFORMATION DISSEMINATION &
PUBLICATIONS
Journal “Cement, Energy and
Environment”:
CMA published 4 issues of the Journal
covering April to June, combined issue
for July to September & October to
December, 2009 (Vol. 8, Nos. 3, 4)
and January to March, 2010 (Vol.9,
No.1)
The Journal continued its decade-long
Mission of information dissemination
among ground level technical
personnel and executives on rapidly
advancing spheres of Technology,
Energy and Environment. Articles
from eminent Indian and International
experts dealing with these topics and
also with recent advancements and
innovations, are regularly published.
Alongside, there are regular insertions
of summary of important articles and
news briefs culled from more than
120 reputed journals, published
brochures, monographs of companies
across the world, daily, weekly and
Fortnightly Newspapers on these
topics. A major part of the Journal has
been hosted on the CMA Website for
easy access by readers in the
Industry.
49th Annual Report
41
The Journal also serves as an
important vehicle of linkage and
communication with parallel Cement
Industry Associations of neighbouring
and major cement producing
countries – Arab Union, Australia,
Canada, China, Indonesia, Iran,
Japan, Turkey, USA etc. CMA is
maintaining regular exchange of
Journals among these Associations to
keep abreast of the developments in
other cement producing Countries.
� Cement for Construction – Consumers Guide
The English language version of
this Guide originally published in
2004 had gained fast popularity
among the broad spectrum of
stakeholders leading to 2 more
editions being published in 2005
and 2008. Sensing the popularity
and growing demand across India
of this 40-page Booklet, CMA
brought out a reprint of the English
language version this year. In
view of large-scale popularity
gained by this publication, CMA
had also brought out 8 Regional
Language Versions of the book in
Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada,
Malyalam, Punjabi, Tamil, Telagu.
� Building Lasting Home – A Home Makers Guide
This 72 page book covers
established practice, recent
developments and technology
trends in concrete and construction
world for awareness and
knowledge base creation among a
host of stake holders ranging from
statutory bodies, construction
agencies and builders, and
individuals interested in
constructing own dwelling units.
� Construction, Maintenance and Upkeep of Concrete Building
The problems of maintenance and
upkeep of civil construction and
structures are multiplying manifold
over the years because of the
expanding gap between the
demand and supply of housing
units accentuating thereby the
need of larger life of existing
buildings. Following CSIR
estimates, India loses annually
around 10% of GDP due to
deterioration and decay of existing
infrastructure mainly due to (a)
wear and tear, (b) corrosion, (c)
natural calamity, (e) improper or
inadequate maintenance. Keeping
in view, the importance of
maintenance and upkeep of
concrete buildings for sustainable
development, CMA has brought out
this 75 page book for awareness
creation. The book covers all
aspects of maintenance of
buildings, namely, mechanism of
reinforced concrete structures,
causes of failures of structures,
safety factors, structural advice,
role and impact of interior and
exterior finishes, plumbing,
drainage, sanitation work,
42
electrical wiring etc. on durability
and sustainability of concrete
buildings.
Seminars and Conferences
During the Year, CMA organized/co-
sponsored/participated in Seminars/
Workshops/Conferences with a view
to promoting and sharing new
developments and technical
innovations with different
stakeholders in the long-term interest
of the Industry, as per the details
below:
11th NCB International Seminar
1. The seminar was organized by
National Council for Cement
and Building Materials with
CMA’s patronage in New Delhi
on 17 – 20 November, 2009.
Energy Efficiency
2. The 11th F L Smidth Energy
Awards Event organized by MP
and Chhattisgarh Cement
Manufacturers’ Association in
Bhopal on 15th April 2009.
3. Seminar on Energy
Conservation Technology in
Cement Industry organized by
NEDO, Japan in New Delhi on
6th November 2009.
4. Workshop on “International
Comparison of Industrial
Energy Efficiency” organized by
the Bureau of Energy Efficiency
(BEE) jointly with the
International Energy Agency
(IEA) in New Delhi during 27 –
28 January 2010.
5. Workshop on “Regional Analysis
of India in the Energy
Technology Perspective 2010”
organized by BEE in New Delhi
on 29th January 2010.
6. “Interactive Meet on Perform,
Achieve and Trade (PAT)
Scheme’ organized by BEE in
New Delhi on 25th February,
2010.
7. 6th Green Cementech 2010
organized by CII and CMA in
Hyderabad on 13 – 14 May
2010.
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
The Managing Committee is happy to
report that the Labour-Management
Relations in Cement Industry
continued to be cordial, harmonious
and healthy during the year under
review.
The Memorandum of Settlement
dated 26th April, 2005 signed
between the CMA and Cement
Workers’ Federation & Central Trade
Unions expired on 31st March, 2010.
Dr.G Sanjeeva Reddy, President,
Indian National Cement Workers’
Federation (INCWF) by his letter
dated 30th January 2010 gave a
notice for Termination of
Memorandum of Settlement dated
49th Annual Report
43
26th April, 2005 as required under the
provisions of Industrial Dispute Act
and Rules made there under. Further,
vide his letter dated 1st February
2010 he submitted new Charter of 36
Demands. The AITUC, HMS and CITU
vide their communication dated 15th
February 2010 had also jointly issued
Notice of Termination and enclosed
the same 36 Charter of Demands as
submitted by INCWF. The Akhil
Bhartiya Cement Mazdoor Mahasangh
(ABCMM) also submitted Notice of
Termination vide letter dated
31.1.2010 and submitted 31 Charter
of Demands vide letter dated
15.2.2010 (both the letters were
received by CMA on 3 March, 2010).
As was done hitherto and as advised
by President, CMA, a communication
dated 22nd February, 2010 was
addressed to Members that each
Member Company of the Association
may, after due consideration, advise
CMA clearly whether they authorize
CMA on their behalf to negotiate with
the Labour towards reaching wage
settlement. Members were also
requested to send their option either
favouring or otherwise for the
Industry-wide negotiation/settlement.
CMA member companies having about
77% of total capacity of member
companies authorized CMA to
negotiate with the Labour towards
reaching a settlement/understanding
with regard to the demands raised by
the above National Trade Unions.
The first Wage Negotiation meeting
with representatives of Trade Unions
was held on 12th April 2010 in
Mumbai. CMA was represented by
Shri N. Srinivasan (Vice President &
Managing Director, India Cements
Ltd).
The second meeting was held on 7th
June 2010 in New Delhi. CMA was
represented by Shri N. Srinivasan and
Shri Manoj Gaur at this meeting.
Third meeting was held on 20th July
2010 at Chennai wherein CMA was
represented by Shri N. Srinivasan.
Fourth meeting was held on 30th
August 2010 at Mumbai. Shri N.
Srinivasan, Shri Manoj Gaur and
Shri O.P. Puranmalka represented
CMA at this meeting. The discussions
are in progress.
CMA HYDERABAD OFFICE
As reported last year, in March, 2009
the Managing Committee approved
the premises for CMA Hyderabad
Office, which was finalized by a Group
of Members on behalf of CMA,
consisting of S/Shri K C Jain, P Pratap
Reddy, A K Kejriwal, Rakesh Singh
and I Gopinath.
The Sale Deed for the premises (2395
Sq.ft. at a cost of Rs.195.60 Lakhs
plus Stamp Duty amounting to
Rs.18.58 Lakhs) was executed in
November, 2009.
The Managing Committee at its
meeting held on 30th November,
44
2009 decided that the same
Committee under the Chairmanship of
Shri K C Jain, which was authorized to
finalise the purchase of premises at
Hyderabad, may also pursue the task
in respect of Interiors, Furnitures etc.
of the Hyderabad Office.
The Committee engaged the services
of M/s. Fountainhead Design
(Architecture & Interiors Firm) to
prepare the Interiors plan. The Plan
and Estimates were placed before HPC
at its meeting held on 9th April 2010.
The estimated time for completion of
the interior work is 2.5 months to 3
months from the date of placement of
order. Work orders for Design and
Consultancy and Interiors and
Furnitures have been placed on 18th
May 2010. The interior work has since
been completed and the furniture
procured. The office is now ready for
use.
Your Managing Committee is hopeful
that CMA Hyderabad Office will
become functional very soon.
CMA ON-LINE PROJECT
As Mentioned in the last year’s Annual
Report M/s Coromandel Infotech India
Ltd, were awarded the project in
March 2009. The Project requires
close coordination of CMA and
Member Companies with M/s
Coromandel Infotech India Ltd.
A number of Meetings were held
involving Members of Cement
Companies and the Consultants for
testing and validating the project and
its adaptability to our requirements.
In the course of such interaction,
several very useful suggestions were
received from the Cement Companies’
representatives. These were duly
incorporated by the Consultants. The
Beta Version of the Software has been
finalized and is currently under trial
run involving three Member
Companies to test the working of the
system and fine-tuning the same
before it is adapted for wider use by
all the Members.
RESIGNATION OF ACC LTD AND AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD
ACC Ltd was one of the founder
Members of CMA, which came into
existence in 1961, while Ambuja
Cements Ltd joined the Association as
Member in 1983.
Both these organizations resigned
from the Membership of the
Association at the end of October
2009. The Managing Committee at its
meeting held on 30th November 2009
accepted the resignation of ACC Ltd
and Ambuja Cements Ltd.
PARLIAMENTARY STANDING
COMMITTEE MEETING
The Parliamentary Standing
Committee on Commerce while
examining the Performance of the
Cement Industry desired to have the
views of the Cement Industry and
requested representatives of CMA
including top ten cement
manufacturers to appear before the
49th Annual Report
45
Committee on 16th December 2009.
A request had also been made to the
Industry to send a Note covering the
various aspects of the Cement
Industry that are likely to be
presented before the Committee,
latest by 15th December 2009 for
circulation to Members of the
Committee.
A Note had been accordingly sent to
Rajya Sabha Secretariat on
11.12.2009. The meeting was,
however, postponed to 11th January
2010.
President, CMA, along with a few
Senior Members of the Association
appeared before the Committee,
during which, a Presentation was
made by Shri Saurabh Misra. During
the session, President, CMA Smt.
Vinita Singhania, Shri Manoj Gaur,
Shri H.M. Bangur, Shri T.S.
Raghupathy made very effective and
positive contribution through their
intervention and provided replies and
clarifications to the points raised by
the Members of the Standing
Committee.
As a sequel, a Note to the Rajya
Sabha Secretariat was sent on 13th
January 2010 covering the
clarifications on the estimated saving
of 14% fuel on Cement Concrete
Roads compared to Bituminous Roads
and the basis of calculation on the
total savings that could be effected if
the Government went in for Cement
Concrete Roads, as desired by
Chairman of the Committee.
CMA PUBLICATIONS
During the year 2009-10, CMA
brought out/ updated the following
publications/ periodicals:
� Indian Cement Industry - Statistics
(2009)
� Cement, Energy and Environment
– Quarterly
� Cement News Digest – Weekly
� Cement Journal – Quarterly
� Handbook on Cement Concrete
Roads (Revised)
� Construction, Maintenance and
Upkeep of concrete Building
� DOs and DONTs for Cement
Concrete Road Construction
� Building Lasting Homes
A detailed list of CMA publications is
given in Annexure-XI.
AUDIT
The Accounts of the Association for
the year ended 31st March 2010 have
been audited by M/s K.S. Aiyar & Co.,
Chartered Accountants.
New Delhi (Vinita Singhania)
August 2010 President
49th Annual Report
46
LIST OF ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE-I Capacity Additions during 2009-10
ANNEXURE-II Performance of Cement Companies (Company-wise/Unit-wise)
ANNEXURE-III Performance of Cement Industry (Including Mini and White sector)
Performance of Cement Industry (Large Plants)
Region-wise Capacity and Production (Large Plants)
ANNEXURE-IV Chairmen/Co-Chairmen of CMA Committees
ANNEXURE-V Month-wise Coal Receipts against FSA/Linkage
ANNEXURE-VI Consumption of Coal/Fuel including Captive Power Plants
ANNEXURE-VII Year-wise Cement Despatches by Rail/Road and Sea
ANNEXURE-VIII Country-wise Cement and Clinker Export
ANNEXURE-IX Cement Concrete Roads - Broad details of action taken and results obtained
ANNEXURE-X Cement Industry’s comments on Notifications of the MoEF and the Ministry of Mines
ANNEXURE-XI List of CMA Publications
*****
47
ANNEXURE-I
CAPACITY ADDITIONS DURING 2009-10
(Mn. t)
Name of the Plant State Month of Commissioning
Capacity Existing
Capacity Added / Derated
Total
(a) New
India Cements - Parli (G) MAH Apr 09 - 1.10 1.10
Dalmia Cement-Ariyalur T.N. Jun 09 - 2.50 2.50
Madras Cmts-Uthiramerur (G) T.N. Jul 09 - 0.60 0.60
Madras Cmts-Salem (G) T.N. Sep 09 - 0.60 0.60
J.K. Muddapur KAR Sep 09 - 3.00 3.00
Jaypee-Kutch GUJ. Sep 09 - 1.20 1.20
Jaypee-Sidhi M.P. Sep 09 - 1.00 1.00
Jaypee-Roorkee (G) UTK Jan 10 - 1.20 1.20
Jaypee-Wanakbori (G) GUJ. Jan 10 - 1.50 1.50
Madras Cmts-Kolaghat (G) W.B. Feb 10 - 1.00 1.00
Grasim-Kotputli RAJ. Mar 10 - 3.10 3.10
Jaypee-Bagheri (B & G) H.P. Mar 10 - 1.75 1.75
Grasim-Aligarh (G) U.P. Mar 10 - 1.30 1.30
Total – (a) 19.85
(b) Expansion
Shriram Cements RAJ. Apr 09 0.20 0.20 0.40
OCL India - Rajgangpur Orissa Apr 09 1.80 2.20 4.00
OCL India – Kapilas (G) Orissa Apr 09 0.90 0.45 1.35
India Cements – Chilamkur A.P. Apr 09 1.45 0.01 1.46
India Cements – Yerraguntla A.P. Apr 09 0.52 0.21 0.73
India Cements – Raasi A.P. Apr 09 2.30 0.20 2.50
India Cements – Visaka A.P. Apr 09 1.12 1.28 2.40
Chettinad Cement-Karur T.N. Apr 09 0.60 0.40 1.00
Chettinad Cement-Karikalli T.N. Apr 09 1.20 0.60 1.80
India Cements - Sankarnagar T.N. Apr 09 1.80 0.25 2.05
India Cements - Sankaridurg T.N. Apr 09 0.60 0.26 0.86
JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd RAJ. Aug 09 3.40 0.80 4.20
Vasvadatta Cement KAR Aug 09 4.10 1.65 5.75
Orient Cement-Jalgaon (G) MAH Oct 09 1.00 1.00 2.00
Binani Cement-Sirohi RAJ. Dec 09 4.60 0.25 4.85
Jaypee-Chunar (G) U.P. Dec 09 1.50 0.50 2.00
Jaypee-Dalla U.P. Dec 09 0.43 0.07 0.50
Orient Cement A.P. Jan 10 2.40 0.60 3.00
Chettinad Cement-Karur T.N. Jan 10 1.00 0.60 1.60
Chettinad Cement-Karikalli T.N. Jan 10 1.80 0.20 2.00
Chettinad Cement-Ariyalur T.N. Jan 10 2.00 2.60 4.60
Grasim-Aditya Cement – II RAJ. Mar 10 1.60 1.60 3.20
UltraTech APCW – II A.P. Mar 10 2.40 1.20 3.60
Total – (b) 17.13
Total – (a)+(b) 36.98
49th Annual Report
48
ANNEXURE-II
PERFORMANCE OF CEMENT COMPANIES (COMPANY-WISE/UNIT-WISE)
(2009-10)
(000' Tonnes)
Sl. No. Company/Plant Location State Capacity Clinker Clinker Cement Cement
(Monthly Prodn. Ground Prodn. Desp.
Add Up)
Andhra Cements Ltd.
1 Vizag (G) Vishakhapatnam AP 622.00 - 157.19 428.02 427.09
2 Nadikude Durga Cmt Nadikude AP 800.00 470.43 433.23 562.92 562.60
Total - Andhra Cements Ltd. 1422.00 470.43 590.42 990.94 989.69
Binani Cement Ltd.
3 Binani Cmt-Sirohi Sirohi Road RAJ. 4683.34 4406.48 3623.73 4162.89 4163.43
4 Binani Cmt-Sikar (G) Neem Ka Thana RAJ. 1400.00 - 778.54 1117.21 1125.76
Total - Binani Cement Ltd. 6083.34 4406.48 4402.27 5280.10 5289.19
Birla Corporation Ltd.
5 Birla Vikas Satna MP 1550.00 2081.99 1248.94 1711.52 1682.22
6 Satna Cement
7 Birla Cement Chittorgarh RAJ. 2000.00 1788.91 1796.49 2363.55 2362.77
8 Chanderia Cement
9 Birla Cmt-RaebareliG Raebareli UP 630.00 - 430.87 630.78 627.16
10 Durgapur (G) Durgapur W.B. 600.00 - 289.71 603.95 603.25
11 Durga Hitech Cmt (G) Durgapur W.B. 1000.00 - 281.04 388.31 387.45
Total - Birla Corporation Ltd. 5780.00 3870.90 4047.05 5698.11 5662.85
Cement Corporation of India Ltd.
12 Adilabad Adilabad AP 400.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
13 Akaltara Akaltara CTG 400.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
14 Bokajan Bokajan ASSAM 200.00 140.50 143.88 150.10 151.10
15 Charkhi Dadri Charkhi Dadri HAR 172.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
16 Kurkunta Kurkunta KAR 200.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
17 Mandhar Mandhar CTG 380.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
18 Neemuch Neemuch MP 400.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
19 Rajban Rajban HP 200.00 165.15 163.75 187.36 188.54
20 Tandur Tandur AP 1000.00 653.75 621.33 630.77 627.41
21 Delhi (G) Tughalakabad DELHI 500.00 - Nil Nil Nil
Total - Cement Corporation of India Ltd. 3852.00 959.40 928.96 968.23 967.05
Cement Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
22 Cement Manu. Co. Ltd Lumshnong MEG. 594.00 602.22 295.08 401.67 401.13
23 Megha T & E (P)Ltd G Lumshnong MEG. 462.00 - 351.39 516.91 516.94
Total - Cement Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1056.00 602.22 646.47 918.58 918.07
Century Textiles & Industries Ltd.
24 Century Cement Tilda CTG 2100.00 1389.92 1346.33 2055.22 2052.41
25 Maihar Cement Maihar MP 3800.00 2784.20 2639.25 3760.28 3728.93
26 Manikgarh Cmt Manikgarh MAH. 1900.00 1459.90 1249.30 1767.71 1768.91
Total - Century Textiles & Industries Ltd. 7800.00 5634.02 5234.88 7583.21 7550.25
Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd.
27 Chettinad-Karur Karur TN 1150.00 724.65 747.26 993.40 993.26
28 Chettinad-Karikkali Karikkali TN 1850.00 1127.64 1155.08 1647.98 1654.95
29 Chettinad-Ariyalur Keelapaluvur TN 2650.00 1177.00 1107.44 1362.09 1352.55
Total - Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd. 5650.00 3029.29 3009.78 4003.47 4000.76
49
Company-wise (000' Tonnes)
Sl. No. Company/Plant Location State Capacity Clinker Clinker Cement Cement
(Monthly Prodn. Ground Prodn. Desp.
Add Up)
Dalmia Cement(Bharat) Ltd.
30 Dalmia - Dalmiapuram Dalmiapuram TN 4000.00 2510.54 2315.24 3114.19 3117.67
31 Dalmia - Kadapa Jammalamadugu AP 2500.00 743.98 675.67 749.11 755.86
32 Dalmia - Ariyalur Thamaraikulam TN 2083.34 115.31 188.45 207.61 202.12
Total - Dalmia Cement(Bharat) Ltd. 8583.34 3369.83 3179.36 4070.91 4075.65
Grasim Industries Ltd.
33 Rajashree-Malkhed Malkhed KAR 3200.00 4019.15 2554.05 2960.98 2944.06
34 Rajashree-Hotgi (G) Hotgi MAH. 1800.00 - 1499.32 1773.43 1768.58
35 Vikram Cement Jawad Road MP 3000.00 3583.07 3093.36 3999.98 3987.43
36 Aditya Cement-I&II Shambhupura RAJ. 3533.34 3941.41 2461.30 3090.27 3073.58
37 Grasim Cement-Raipur Raipur CTG 2500.00 1813.01 1334.29 2284.10 2282.35
38 Grasim South Reddipalayam TN 1400.00 1010.91 1005.32 1363.02 1372.80
39 Grasim-Bhatinda (G) Bhatinda PUB 1750.00 - 1117.61 1743.16 1745.09
40 Grasim - Dadri (G) Dadri UP 1300.00 - 587.95 847.07 847.03
41 Grasim - Panipat (G) Panipat HAR 1300.00 - 701.92 1018.29 1031.98
42 Grasim Cmt-Kotputli Kotputli RAJ. 258.33 179.09 62.81 76.62 68.67
43 Grasim Cmt-Aligarh G Koil UP 108.33 - 25.37 36.58 38.13
Total - Grasim Industries Ltd. 20150.00 14546.64 14443.30 19193.50 19159.70
HMP Cements Ltd.
44 Porbandar Porbandar GUJ. 198.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
45 Shahabad Shahabad KAR 476.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
Total - HMP Cements Ltd. 674.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
Heidelberg Cement(I) Ltd.
46 HCIL-Ammasandra Ammasandra KAR 570.00 136.82 85.12 172.55 175.85
47 HCIL-Damoh Damoh MP 1025.00 1269.48 723.86 1159.38 1160.24
48 HCIL-Jhansi (G) Jhansi UP 500.00 - 490.57 762.28 757.95
49 HCIL-Dolvi (G) Raigad MAH. 1000.00 - 323.35 582.63 580.63
Total - Heidelberg Cement(I) Ltd. 3095.00 1406.30 1622.90 2676.84 2674.67
The India Cements Ltd.
50 Sankarnagar Talaiyuth TN 2050.00 1190.92 1193.19 1650.85 1651.89
51 Sankaridurg Sankaridurg TN 860.00 437.27 381.11 591.41 593.49
52 Chilamkur Works Chilamkur AP 1460.00 1109.64 1051.30 1239.68 1241.21
53 Dalavoi Trichy TN 1850.00 1160.42 1130.60 1664.11 1662.15
54 Visaka Cement Tandur AP 2400.00 1896.00 1089.67 1258.67 1255.34
55 Yerraguntla Yerraguntla AP 730.00 561.80 489.93 598.60 601.64
56 Raasi Cement Wadapally AP 2500.00 2325.90 1824.58 2197.15 2194.32
57 Vallur (G) Vallur TN 1100.00 - 563.91 813.10 821.52
58 Parli (G) Parli MAH. 1100.00 - 362.44 477.54 470.93
Total - The India Cements Ltd. 14050.00 8681.95 8086.73 10491.11 10492.49
J.K. Group
59 J.K-Nimbahera Nimbahera RAJ. 3300.00 2411.45 2120.77 2606.31 2594.34
60 J.K-Mangrol Mangrol RAJ. 750.00 685.02 807.26 988.08 987.10
61 J.K-Gotan Gotan RAJ. 470.00 206.02 260.91 376.83 376.44
62 J.K. Muddapur Mudhol KAR 1750.00 326.11 219.40 313.78 305.50
63 JK Lakshmi Cmt Ltd Sirohi Road RAJ. 3933.34 3523.52 2815.01 3602.41 3600.66
64 JK Lakshmi-Kalol (G) Kalol GUJ. 547.50 - 361.23 554.35 549.47
65 J.K Udaipur Udyog Udaipur RAJ. 900.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
Total - J.K. Group 11650.84 7152.12 6584.58 8441.76 8413.51
49th Annual Report
50
Company-wise (000' Tonnes)
Sl. No. Company/Plant Location State Capacity Clinker Clinker Cement Cement
(Monthly Prodn. Ground Prodn. Desp.
Add Up)
Jaypee Group
66 Dalla Dalla UP 454.67 1372.60 106.21 145.75 140.52
67 Chunar (G) Chunar UP 1666.67 - 1213.35 1701.96 1698.94
68 Jaypee Rewa Rewa MP 3000.00 3204.38 2487.50 3218.12 3171.28
69 Jaypee Bela Bela MP 2400.00 2042.42 1912.16 2387.17 2000.66
70 Jaypee-Sadva Khurd (B) Sadva Khurd UP 600.00 - - 718.70 726.26
71 Jaypee Ayodhya (G) Tanda UP 1000.00 - 707.81 1031.99 1027.03
72 Jaypee - Panipat (G) Panipat HAR 1000.00 - 712.99 1012.50 998.91
73 Jaypee-Sidhi Sidhi MP 583.34 1166.24 315.97 405.09 317.79
74 Jaypee-Kutch Sewagram GUJ. 700.00 447.63 264.70 274.98 271.68
75 Jaypee-Wanakbori (G) Sonipur GUJ. 375.00 - 55.12 72.14 51.74
76 Jaypee-Roorkee (G) Roorkee UTK 300.00 - 88.11 114.09 103.36
77 Jaypee-Bagheri (B&G) Bagheri HP 145.83 - 78.90 141.69 86.09
Jaypee-Baga (@) Baga HP - 143.68 - - -
Bhilai Jaypee (clk) Babupur MP - 248.29 - - -
Total - Jaypee Group 12225.51 8625.24 7942.82 11224.18 10594.26
Kesoram Industries Ltd.
78 Kesoram Cement Ramagundam AP 1500.00 1161.20 1074.67 1379.38 1373.50
79 Vasvadatta Cement Sedam KAR 5200.00 4298.39 3715.86 4206.22 4185.61
Total - Kesoram Industries Ltd. 6700.00 5459.59 4790.53 5585.60 5559.11
Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd.
80 Arasmeta Cement Bilaspur CTG 1600.00 1593.35 1119.59 1723.85 1719.40
81 Lafarge-Sonadih Sonadih CTG 550.00 1886.91 313.30 499.27 499.25
82 Lafarge-Jojobera(G) Singbhum JHK 3400.00 - 1766.60 3459.70 3460.16
83 Lafarge-Mejia (G) Mejia W.B. 1000.00 - 464.72 676.60 679.33
Total - Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd. 6550.00 3480.26 3664.21 6359.42 6358.14
Madras Cements Ltd.
84 Ramasamyraja Nagar R.S.Raja Nagar TN 1800.00 690.45 1021.23 1439.29 1439.18
85 Jayantipuram Jaggayyapet AP 2000.00 1902.26 1604.51 1996.11 1992.25
86 Alathiyur Works-I&II Alathiyur TN 3120.00 2154.40 2015.77 2793.55 2775.77
87 Madras Cmts-Ariyalur Govindapuram TN 2000.00 1216.95 1000.69 1181.66 1154.00
88 Madras-Uthiramerur G Uthiramerur TN 450.00 - 153.53 208.90 211.24
89 Madras Cmts-Salem G Valapadi TN 350.00 - 115.23 156.97 152.80
90 MadrasCmts-KolaghatG Kolaghat W.B. 166.67 - 13.34 17.10 13.58
Total - Madras Cements Ltd. 9886.67 5964.06 5924.30 7793.58 7738.82
Malabar Cements Ltd.
91 Malabar Cements Palghat KERLA 420.00 341.01 298.49 410.55 415.33
92 Malabar Cements (G) Alappuzha KERLA 200.00 - 4.72 6.38 6.55
Total - Malabar Cements Ltd. 620.00 341.01 303.21 416.93 421.88
Mangalam Cement Ltd.
93 Mangalam Cement Morak RAJ. 2000.00 1636.54 1386.39 1636.82 1626.12
94 Neer Shree Cement Morak RAJ.
Total - Mangalam Cement Ltd. 2000.00 1636.54 1386.39 1636.82 1626.12
(@) - Only Clinker Production started.
51
Company-wise (000' Tonnes)
Sl. No. Company/Plant Location State Capacity Clinker Clinker Cement Cement
(Monthly Prodn. Ground Prodn. Desp.
Add Up)
Mehta Group
95 Saurashtra Cement Ranavav GUJ. 1501.00 1242.71 1106.49 1226.88 1236.82
96 Gujarat Sidhee Cmt Veraval GUJ. 1200.00 1286.72 1208.68 1345.08 1341.56
Total - Mehta Group 2701.00 2529.43 2315.17 2571.96 2578.38
OCL India Ltd.
97 OCL India-Rajgangpur Rajgangpur ORISS 4000.00 1174.61 1016.90 2092.62 2091.62
98 OCL India-Kapilas G Kapilas ORISS 1350.00 - 465.84 942.44 940.54
Total - OCL India Ltd. 5350.00 1174.61 1482.74 3035.06 3032.16
Orient Cement
99 Orient Cement Devapur AP 2550.00 2345.72 1426.67 2006.96 1995.18
100 Orient Cmt-Jalgaon G Jalgaon MAH. 1500.00 - 732.79 1052.12 1048.56
Total - Orient Cement 4050.00 2345.72 2159.46 3059.08 3043.74
Penna Cement Industries Ltd.
101 Penna-Tadipatri I&II Tadipatri AP 1500.00 1200.06 1189.94 1421.24 1423.98
102 Penna-Ganeshpahad Ganeshpahad AP 1000.00 965.25 970.57 1170.79 1177.88
103 Penna-Boyareddypalli Boyareddypalli AP 2000.00 1189.31 1221.34 1496.33 1502.24
Total - Penna Cement Industries Ltd. 4500.00 3354.62 3381.85 4088.36 4104.10
Rain Commodities Ltd.
104 Rain Comdt.Un-I Ramapuram AP 1400.00 830.65 803.40 1036.08 1033.62
105 Rain Comdt.UnII LN 1 Racherla AP 600.00 348.01 316.37 440.67 440.65
Rain Comdt.UnII LN 2 Racherla AP 2000.00 1010.02 908.04 934.59 929.99
Total - Rain Commodities Ltd. 4000.00 2188.68 2027.81 2411.34 2404.26
Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd.
106 Alangulam Alangulam TN 400.00 165.57 186.09 214.51 213.04
107 Ariyalur Ariyalur TN 500.00 450.01 463.22 510.23 510.41
Total - Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd. 900.00 615.58 649.31 724.74 723.45
UltraTech Cement Ltd.
108 UltraTech - ACW Chandrapur MAH. 3600.00 2761.51 2635.10 3316.23 3322.76
109 UltraTech - JCW (G) Jharsuguda ORISS 1000.00 - 665.65 972.89 974.77
110 UltraTech - HCW Hirmi CTG 1900.00 2357.67 1597.52 2205.87 2206.98
111 UltraTech - Gujarat Pipavav GUJ. 5800.00 5289.60 3370.58 4024.71 4033.14
112 UltraTech-APCW-I&II Tadpatri AP 4500.00 3634.51 2231.03 2817.49 2785.28
113 UltraTech - ARCW (G) Arakonam TN 1100.00 - 726.88 950.13 950.40
114 UltraTech - WBCW (G) Durgapur W.B. 1200.00 - 709.51 1097.96 1092.99
115 UltraTech-Ginigera G Ginigera KAR 1300.00 - 407.39 750.88 741.65
116 Jafrabad Jafrabad GUJ. 500.00 1499.87 382.44 424.24 424.99
117 Magdalla (G) Magdalla GUJ. 700.00 - 542.25 692.04 696.60
118 Ratnagiri (G) Ratnagiri MAH. 400.00 - 365.47 384.77 382.13
Total - UltraTech Cement Ltd. 22000.00 15543.16 13633.82 17637.21 17611.69
Zuari Cement Ltd.
119 Zuari Cement Krishna Nagar AP 2200.00 1750.48 1720.07 2015.46 2016.68
120 Sri Vishnu Cement Sitapuram AP 1200.00 942.66 974.23 1178.80 1180.93
Total - Zuari Cement Ltd. 3400.00 2693.14 2694.30 3194.26 3197.61
49th Annual Report
52
Company-wise (000' Tonnes)
Sl. No. Company/Plant Location State Capacity Clinker Clinker Cement Cement
(Monthly Prodn. Ground Prodn. Desp.
Add Up)
Others
121 Shree Digvijay-Sikka Sikka GUJ. 1075.00 1010.24 902.93 1031.23 1031.45
122 Shree Cement Beawar RAJ. 9100.00 8045.10 7006.53 9377.61 9361.23
123 Prism Cement Satna MP 2000.00 2317.92 1881.73 2568.32 2564.64
124 Lemos Cement Khalari JHK 109.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
125 Kistna Kistna AP 214.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
126 Bagalkot Cmt&Ind Ltd Bagalkot KAR 297.00 118.37 116.07 164.70 162.46
127 J&K Ltd Khrew J&K 200.00 142.89 155.30 162.53 163.64
128 Kalyanpur Cement Banjari BIHAR 1000.00 454.45 436.25 675.74 676.01
129 K.C.P. Ltd Macherla AP 660.00 639.41 727.51 807.65 807.65
130 Mawmluh Cherra Cherrapunji MEG. 200.00 61.06 59.43 60.55 60.61
131 Panyam Cements Bugganipalle AP 531.00 428.43 374.27 433.03 431.84
132 Sone Valley Japla JHK 254.00 Nil Nil Nil Nil
133 Shriram Cements Kota RAJ. 400.00 266.60 262.70 367.50 365.44
134 Sanghi Indus. Ltd. Abdasa Taluka GUJ. 2600.00 1878.75 1681.69 1846.01 1851.85
135 My Home Indus. Ltd. Mellacheruvu AP 3200.00 2312.30 2123.10 2632.98 2625.55
136 Meghalaya Cmts. Ltd. Lumshnong MEG. 297.00 523.39 391.99 557.62 555.98
Total - Others 22137.00 18198.91 16119.50 20685.47 20658.35
Grand Total 196866.70 128280.13 121252.12 160740.77 159845.95
G - Grinding Unit
B - Blending Unit
B & G - Blending & Grinding Unit
Clk - Clinkerisation Unit
53
ANNEXURE-III
PERFORMANCE OF CEMENT INDUSTRY (Including Mini and White Sector)
(Mn.t)
Year Capacity at Cement the Year End Production
VII Plan 1989-90 (Terminal Year) 61.74 45.42
Annual Plans 1990-91 64.55 48.90 1991-92 66.98 53.61
VIII Plan
1992-93 70.61 54.08 1993-94 77.38 57.96 1994-95 84.22 62.35 1995-96 96.18 69.64 1996-97 105.68 76.22
IX Plan 1997-98 110.93 83.16 1998-99 116.98 87.91 1999-00 120.16 100.45 2000-01 133.04 100.11 2001-02 146.04 106.90
X Plan
2002-03 150.48 116.35 2003-04 157.05 123.50 2004-05 164.70 133.57 2005-06 171.10 147.81 2006-07 178.89 161.64
XI Plan 2007-08 209.20 174.31 2008-09 230.61 187.61 2009-10 * 226.88 166.74
* Excludes data from two cement companies that discontinued Membership with CMA during 2009-10.
0
50
100
150
200
250
89-90
90-91
91-92
92-93
93-94
94-95
95-96
96-97
97-98
98-99
99-00
00-01
01-02
02-03
03-04
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
Capacity Production
Year
Mn
.t.
49th Annual Report
54
ANNEXURE-III (Contd.)
PERFORMANCE OF CEMENT INDUSTRY (Large Plants)
(Mn.t)
Year Capacity at Cement
the Year End Production
VII Plan
1989-90 (Terminal Year) 57.15 42.92
Annual Plans
1990-91 59.31 45.75
1991-92 61.73 50.61
VIII Plan
1992-93 65.36 50.72
1993-94 71.68 54.09
1994-95 78.52 58.35
1995-96 87.18 64.54
1996-97 96.68 69.98
IX Plan
1997-98 101.93 76.74
1998-99 107.98 81.67
1999-00 111.16 94.21
2000-01 121.94 93.61
2001-02 134.94 102.40
X Plan
2002-03 139.38 111.35
2003-04 145.95 117.50
2004-05 153.60 127.57
2005-06 160.00 141.81
2006-07 167.79 155.64
XI Plan
2007-08 198.10 168.31
2008-09 219.51 181.61
2009-10 * 215.78 160.74
REGION-WISE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTION (Large Plants)
(Mn.t.)
Region 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 *
Inst. Cap.
Prodn. Inst. Cap.
Prodn. Inst. Cap.
Prodn. Inst. Cap.
Prodn. Inst. Cap.
Prodn.
North 31.12 29.67 33.77 32.10 47.47 36.46 49.94 41.20 45.54 34.15
East 24.22 20.05 25.35 22.07 29.00 23.85 31.30 26.00 27.10 21.38
South 51.09 44.88 54.09 50.15 61.81 54.23 77.90 59.90 88.51 59.28
West 29.08 24.93 29.28 27.28 32.17 28.75 32.72 28.46 28.62 20.85
Central 24.49 22.28 25.30 24.04 27.65 25.02 27.65 26.05 26.01 25.08
Total 160.00 141.81 167.79 155.64 198.10 168.31 219.51 181.61 215.78 160.74
* Excludes data from two cement companies that discontinued Membership with CMA during 2009-10.
55
ANNEXURE-IV
CHAIRMEN/CO-CHAIRMEN OF CMA COMMITTEES
CMA HIGH POWER COMMITTEE
Mrs. Vinita Singhania Chairman
President, CMA & Managing Director JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd. Shri M.A.M.R. Muthiah Co-Chairman Vice President, CMA & Managing Director Chettinad Cement Corpn.Ltd
CMA COMMITTEE ON COAL MATTERS
Shri P.K. Chand Chairman Chief Financial Officer Birla Corpn. Ltd.
CMA TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
Shri S.K. Wali
Chairman Wholetime Director,
JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd.
CMA ENERGY TASK FORCE
(Part of Technical Committee)
Dr. K.C. Narang Chairman Advisor Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.
49th Annual Report
56
CMA ENVIRONMENTAL TASK FORCE (Part of Technical Committee)
Shri L. Rajasekar Chairman Jt. Executive President (Technology & Research Centre) Grasim Industries Ltd
Shri P.L. Subramaniam Co-Chairman Sr. President (Operations) The India Cements Ltd
CMA FINANCE/LEGAL MATTERS COMMITTEE
Shri R.G. Bagla Chairman Group Executive President J.K. Cement Works
Shri A.V. Dharmakrishnan Co-Chairman Executive Director (Finance) Madras Cements Ltd
CMA COMMITTEE ON RAILWAY MATTERS
Shri Kamal Kishore Chairman President (Cordn.) Maihar Cement
Shri Rahul Kumar Co-Chairman
Chief Financial Officer Jaiprakash Associates Ltd
57
ANNEXURE-V
MONTH-WISE COAL RECEIPT AGAINST FSA/LINKAGE
(2005-06 to 2009-10)
(Mn.t)
Month 2009-10 * 2008-09 2007-08 2006-07 2005-06
April 0.91 1.09 1.25 1.26 1.26 (1.13) (1.54) (1.42) (1.34) (1.37)
May 0.86 0.96 1.10 1.26 1.20
(1.13) (1.54) (1.42) (1.34) (1.37)
June 0.85 1.17 1.21 1.27 1.00 (1.13) (1.54) (1.42) (1.34) (1.37)
Sub-Total 2.62 3.22 3.56 3.79 3.46 (3.39) (4.62) (4.26) (4.02) (4.11)
July 0.92 1.09 1.30 1.27 1.16
(1.13) (1.50) (1.33) (1.25) (1.34)
August 0.98 1.06 1.30 1.12 1.32 (1.13) (1.50) (1.33) (1.25) (1.34)
September 0.86 1.10 1.26 1.12 1.17 (1.13) (1.50) (1.33) (1.25) (1.34)
Sub-Total 2.76 3.25 3.86 3.51 3.65
(3.39) (4.50) (3.99) (3.75) (4.02)
October 0.97 1.27 1.34 1.16 1.25 (1.13) (1.54) (1.35) (1.29) (1.43)
November 0.94 1.33 1.20 1.19 1.34
(1.13) (1.54) (1.35) (1.29) (1.43)
December 0.80 1.37 1.12 1.15 1.35 (1.13) (1.54) (1.35) (1.29) (1.43)
Sub-Total 2.71 3.97 3.66 3.50 3.94 (3.39) (4.62) (4.05) (3.87) (4.29)
January 0.90 1.42 1.18 1.17 1.32
(1.13) (1.54) (1.35) (1.28) (1.56)
February 0.90 1.21 1.13 1.18 1.15 (1.13) (1.54) (1.35) (1.28) (1.56)
March 0.89 1.22 1.17 1.28 1.29 (1.13) (1.54) (1.35) (1.28) (1.56)
Sub-Total 2.69 3.85 3.48 3.63 3.76 (3.39) (4.62) (4.05) (3.84) (4.68)
Grand Total 10.78 14.29 14.56 14.43 14.81 (13.56) (18.36) (16.35) (15.48) (17.10)
Notes : Figures in brackets pertain to FSA Quantity/Linkage There may be small difference in figures indicated elsewhere due to rounding off.
* Excludes data from two cement companies that discontinued Membership with CMA during 2009-10.
49th Annual Report
58
ANNEXURE-VI
CONSUMPTION OF COAL/ FUEL INCLUDING
CAPTIVE POWER PLANTS
(1992-93 to 2009-10)
(Mn.t)
Year Actual Coal Coal Coal Lignite,
Fuel Receipt purchased Imported Pet Coke
Consumption against from open and
Linkage Market other Fuel
VIII Plan
1992-93 12.05 10.49 1.27 0.09 0.80
1993-94 12.78 10.34 0.86 0.12 0.70
1994-95 13.29 10.28 2.32 0.71 0.80
1995-96 14.25 10.06 2.80 1.30 0.80
1996-97 15.03 10.45 2.48 1.65 0.70
IX Plan
1997-98 14.98 9.61 1.62 3.52 0.42
1998-99 13.98 8.24 0.77 4.66 0.20
1999-00 15.42 9.01 0.63 6.04 0.05
2000-01 15.37 9.74 0.79 4.40 0.42
2001-02 15.81 11.09 0.87 3.37 0.96
X Plan
2002-03 17.83 12.35 0.77 3.66 1.09
2003-04 18.85 13.35 1.03 3.18 1.52
2004-05 21.21 14.84 1.27 3.63 2.63
2005-06 22.39 14.81 1.55 3.40 2.98
2006-07 25.02 14.43 2.94 4.96 2.92
XI Plan
2007-08 27.33 14.56 5.00 6.08 3.20
2008-09 29.57 14.29 6.17 6.97 2.77
2009-10 * 25.80 10.78 4.36 6.95 4.15
* Excludes data from two cement companies that discontinued Membership
with CMA during 2009-10.
59
ANNEXURE-VII
YEAR-WISE CEMENT DESPATCHES BY RAIL, ROAD AND SEA (1992-93 to 2009-10)
(Large Plants)
(Mn.t)
Despatches %age
Year Despatches
Rail Road Sea Total by Rail
to Total
VIII Plan
1992-93 26.99 23.69 - 50.68 53
1993-94 28.45 25.77 - 54.22 52
1994-95 29.29 29.02 - 58.31 50
1995-96 29.12 35.37 - 64.49 45
1996-97 31.08 38.81 - 69.89 44
IX Plan
1997-98 32.58 43.99 - 76.57 43
1998-99 32.72 49.11 - 81.83 40
1999-00 38.71 55.29 - 94.00 41
2000-01 36.80 56.64 - 93.44 39
2001-02 36.20 64.06 2.11 102.37 35
X Plan
2002-03 37.12 72.25 1.70 111.07 33
2003-04 39.28 76.45 1.50 117.23 34
2004-05 41.45 83.55 2.14 127.14 33
2005-06 48.11 85.61 7.85 141.57 34
(10.62) (6.07) (2.34) (19.03) (56)
2006-07 59.37 88.25 7.62 155.24 38
(11.19) (6.90) (2.95) (21.04) (53)
XI Plan
2007-08 63.86 98.01 5.81 167.68 38
(12.59) (6.55) (2.89) (22.03) (57)
2008-09 68.33 107.36 5.50 181.19 38 (14.61) (8.17) (3.47) (26.25) (56)
2009-10 * 56.85 100.42 2.58 159.85 36 (14.23) (7.99) (3.43) (25.65) (55)
Figures in brackets pertain to Clinker Despatches
* Excludes data from two cement companies that discontinued Membership
with CMA during 2009-10.
49th Annual Report
60
ANNEXURE-VIII
ALL INDIA - COUNTRY-WISE CEMENT AND CLINKER EXPORT (2008-09 and 2009-10)
(Tonnes)
Country
2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09 2009-10 2008-09
Nepal 543294 419619 879778 509876 1423072 929495
Qatar 55916 248468 107806 90233 163722 338701
Sri Lanka 121939 39201 - - 121939 39201
Mozambique - 42857 78459 - 78459 42857
Iraq 65793 648259 - - 65793 648259
U.A.E. - 39577 30257 241463 30257 281040
Angola 18601 - - - 18601 -
Maldives 15731 1465 - - 15731 1465
South Africa 15452 - - - 15452 -
Sudan 15285 96472 - - 15285 96472
Yemen 14491 53090 - - 14491 53090
Oman 9917 36335 - 59340 9917 95675
Comores 6006 - - - 6006 -
Somalia 4605 6178 - - 4605 6178
Bhutan - - 241 3999 241 3999
Kuwait - 138018 - 73712 - 211730
Tanzania - 17127 - - - 17127
Mauritius - 13556 - 13556
Bangladesh - 2541 - - - 2541
Bahrain - 2500 - - - 2500
Mayotee - 2160 - - - 2160
Djibouti - 447 - - - 447
Congo - 84 - - - 84
Ethopia - - - - - -
Others ($) 712846 1392471 2046808 1920860 2759654 3313331
Total 1599876 3200425 3143349 2899483 4743225 6099908
($) - Country-wise break-up is awaited.
Total ExportCement Export Clinker Export
61
ANNEXURE-IX
CEMENT CONCRETE ROADS - BROAD DETAILS OF
ACTION TAKEN AND RESULTS OBTAINED
4th April, 2009 Presentation on Concrete Roads was made, along with Grasim
Industries Ltd. to Senior Municipal Engineers of Dharwad and
Hubli.
16th April, 2009 Presentation on Advantages of Concrete Roads was made to Senior
Officials of the PWD, Port Trust and Airports Authority in
Surat, jointly with Grasim Industries Ltd.
17th April 2009 Presentation on Concrete Roads was made along with Grasim
Industries Ltd. to Senior State Govt. Officials and other Road
and Airport construction professionals in Ahmedabad.
14th May 2009 Presentation on Concrete Roads was made to Hon'ble Chief
Minister of Delhi, Mrs. Shiela Dikshit. The Hon'ble Chief Minister
stated that she was convinced of the superiority of Concrete Roads,
and agreed to convert 400 kms of Delhi's roads into concrete. This
Presentation was made along with JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd.
28th May 2009 Presentation on Concrete Roads was made to Senior Officials of
the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. The Corporation has
already constructed 44 kms. of Concrete Roads and has now
allocated Rs.154 crores for more such Roads.
11th June 2009 Govt. of Karnataka sanctioned 176.49 km of Cement Concrete Roads
costing Rs.86.37 crores under PMGSY. NRRDA approved these Roads
under Technology Demonstration Project and the work on these
Roads is in progress in Districts of Hasan, Shimoga, Haveri and
Belgaum.
14th & 17th
June 2009
Two Presentations on Concrete Roads were made to Senior
Engineers of UP PWD and Engineers of the Rural Roads
Development, UP in Lucknow. The Engineer-in-Chief, UP PWD,
accepted that Concrete Roads were superior to bituminous ones in
many respects, and added that UP was already building Concrete
Highways like the Yamuna Expressway. These presentations were
made jointly with Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.
16th & 17th
July 2009
Two Presentations on Concrete vs. Bitumen Roads were made to
Senior Engineers of Tamil Nadu PWD in Chennai. Chief
Engineers present said they could seek CMA's help for designing
Concrete Roads, suitable for their areas. These Presentations were
made along with India Cements Ltd.
49th Annual Report
62
19th Aug. 2009 Presentation on Concrete Roads was made to the Director General
(Roads) and Senior Officials of the Ministry of Road Transport
and Highways (MoRTH) in Delhi. After the Presentation, DG
(Roads) announced that henceforth the MoRTH would allow
the use of PPC and Slag Cement in Concrete Road
construction.
8th Sept. 2009 Presentation on Concrete Roads was made to the Maharashtra
Economic Development Council in Mumbai. The Council noted
that the hundreds of kilometers of Concrete Roads constructed in
Mumbai and other cities in Maharashtra had facilitated smoother
flow of traffic.
11th Sept. 2009 Presentation on Construction of Cement Concrete Roads was made
to the Shree Gyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan Committee at
Alandi in Maharashtra. The Chief Manager of the Sansthan agreed
to concretize Roads in the area, to keep them damage free and pot-
hole free throughout the year, for the convenience of the lakhs of
pilgrims who visit the shrine.
19th Nov. 2009 CMA representatives met Deputy Secretary, PWD Shri M.N.
Dekate, Govt. of Maharashtra to apprise him of the advantages of
Cement Concrete Roads. Mr. Dekate informed CMA that it is
proposed to build stretches of State Highways passing through
cities, and towns in Cement Concrete.
19th Nov. 2009 CMA conveyed advantages of Cement Concrete Roads through D.O.
letters to all the District Collectors of Maharashtra and requested
them to implement various infrastructure projects in their district
such as construction of stretches of State Highways, Major District
Roads, other District Roads and Rural Roads in Cement Concrete.
27th Nov. 2009 CMA conveyed the highlights of comparative advantages of Cement
Concrete Roads to Hon'ble Dy. Chief Minister and Minister of
Public Works Deptt., Govt. of Maharashtra, Shri Chhagan
Bhujbal, Hon'ble Shri Sunil Tatkare, Minister of Finance and
Planning, Govt. of Maharashtra and Shri Vithal V. Kamat,
President, Mahatrashtra Economic Development Council,
Mumbai and requested them to take up with State authorities as a
policy decision to undertake four-laning of Mumbai-Goa National
Highway in Cement Concrete and also take up stretches of State
Highways in Cement Concrete.
4th Dec. 2009 CMA officials met Dr. C.S. Viswanatha, Head of Task Force in the
State of Karnataka, Shri N.S. Ramesh, Chief Engineer,
Karnataka Road Development Corporation Ltd., Shri H.S.
Prakash Kumar, Chief Operating Officer, Karnataka Rural Road
Development Agency and Shri N. Lakshman Rao Peshve,
63
Secretary to Govt. of Karnataka and apprised them about the
activities of CMA and conveyed highlights of the comparative
advantages of Cement Concrete Roads over the conventional
Bitumen ones.
9th Dec. 2009 CMA conveyed advantages of Cement Concrete Roads to all the
District Collectors of Goa and requested them to undertake
construction of stretches of major District Roads, other District
Roads and Rural Roads in Cement Concrete.
10th Dec. 2009 Smt. Sheila Dixit, Hon'ble Chief Minister of Delhi took a decision
to construct about 192 km Cement Concrete Roads in Phase-I in
Delhi.
22nd Dec. 2009 CMA officials met Shri R. Dhan Singh, Chief Engineer, Greater
Hyderabad Muncipal Corporation (GHMC) and Smt. Lakshmi
Parthasarathy, Pricipal Secretary, Deptt. of Transport and
Building at Hyderabad and conveyed the advantages of Cement
Concrete Roads.
4th Jan. 2010 CMA officials contacted Capt. BVJK Sharma, CEO and JMD of JSW,
Jaigarh Port Ltd, to apprise him about the advantages of Cement
Concrete Pavement with regard to proposed construction of 9 km –
4-lane road in District Ratnagiri. A letter has also been written to
Capt. BVJK Sharma requesting for construction of above Road in
Cement Concrete.
7th Jan. 2010 CMA wrote to Hon'ble Minister for Road Transport, Shri Kamal
Nath and Hon'ble Minister of State for Environment, Shri Jai
Ram Ramesh, informing them of advantages of Cement Concrete
Roads, and requesting them to formulate a policy that all future road
construction should be in Cement Concrete in the interest of nation.
15th Jan. 2010 CMA conveyed highlights of comparative advantages of Cement
Concrete Roads to the Development Authorities of Uttar
Pradesh, Punjab, Chennai, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Odisha,
Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Jharkhand, Bihar, Haryana,
Himachal Pradesh and Assam.
29th Jan. 2010 Letter written to Shri Ratnakar Gaikwad, IAS, Commissioner
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
suggesting construction of Cement Concrete Roads in the areas
where there are very few stretches of such Roads.
3rd Feb. 2010 Letter written to Engineer in Chief, Irrigation Deptt. of UP,
highlighting the advantages of Cement Concrete Canal Lining.
49th Annual Report
64
8th Feb.2010 Bangalore Development Authority is executing 116 km
Peripheral Ring Road Project around Bangalore with four-lane and
service roads on either side. CMA has requested the Hon'ble Chief
Minister, as well as Cabinet Ministers, Heads of Municipalities
& Local Bodies, Urban Development Department and
Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority to undertake
the construction of this road in Cement Concrete.
17th Feb.2010 Technical Consultants of India Cements Ltd. had meetings with
officials of various Govt. Departments and undertakings in Tamil
Nadu to brief them on the advantages of Concrete Roads and
persuade them to construct more such Roads.
23rd Feb.2010 Software for comparison of cost of Concrete and Bitumen
Pavements, under different conditions and varying prices was
finalized after detailed discussions with Industry
Representatives.
04th Mar.2010 Presentation on advantages and cost comparison of Cement
Concrete Pavement over Bituminous Pavement was made by CMA
officers on 4th March in the office of the Vice Chairman, Kanpur
Development Authority. Engineers of Kanpur Development
Authority and Kanpur Nagar Nigam were also present.
08th Mar,2010 CMA Officers met Shri Vithal Venkatesh Kamat, President,
Maharashtra Economic Development Council (MEDC) and Shri
Dhananjay Dhawad, Secretary (Roads), Public Works Deptt.,
Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai and apprised them about
the superiority of Cement Concrete Pavements over Bituminous
Pavements. CMA officers assured them for providing any technical
assistance required.
10th Mar.2010 At a function organized by Bangalore University, UltraTech
Cement Ltd. arranged a presentation by Dr. LR Kadiyali on Highway
Pavements - past, present and future, bringing out the advantages
of Cement Concrete pavements. He emphasized the need to switch
over to concrete pavements in preference to bituminous pavements.
12th Mar.2010 All Nodal Officers were requested to organize Seminars, Meetings
and Presentations with decision makers in the State Govts including
Ministers and Sr. Officials as well as Engineers to persuade them to
construct more Cement Concrete Roads.
65
17th Mar. 2010 A Software, developed to quickly find out the cost of comparison of
Cement Concrete Roads viz-a-viz Bituminous ones, after feeding in
necessary inputs such as type of soil, traffic density, price of various
materials etc., circulated to all the Top Executives and Nodal Officers
of Cement Companies. This will help Members in convincing various
authorities regarding cost effectiveness of Cement Concrete Roads.
25th – 26th
Mar. 2010
Presentations on Cement Concrete Roads made to Engineers,
Architects, Builders, BOT Operators and Govt. Officials at
Sholapur and Kolhapur. The PWD engineers evinced keen interest
in taking up concrete pavements on NH, SH and PMGSY Rural
Roads.
26th Mar.2010
CMA explained the advantages of Cement Concrete Roads over
Bituminous Roads to the Secretary of Ministry of Rural
Development and Vice President, NRRDA, New Delhi and
Principal Secretary of Rural Development, Govt. of Uttar
Pradesh and requested them to plan for construction of Roads
under PMGSY in Cement Concrete so that Govt. resources are better
utilized and people living in such areas have a better quality of
Roads.
30th Mar.2010 CMA official met Shri Ashok Kumar, Senior Road Specialist, World
Bank Project. He informed CMA that he is aware of advantages of
cement concrete roads, but wanted to know how to calculate
comparative cost of concrete and bitumen pavements in a foolproof
manner. A copy of our Software and Hand Book on Cement Concrete
Roads has been sent to him. He also informed CMA that wherever it
was considered appropriate, the World Bank recommended concrete
pavements for Roads.
6th Apr. 2010 A comparative cost estimate on which M/s. Jaiprakash Associates
Ltd. had based the construction of Yamuna Expressway in Cement
Concrete was provided by them and the same has been circulated to
all the Nodal Officers and Top Executives of Cement Companies.
19th Apr.2010 CMA has arranged to obtain details of all the tender notices for
construction of Cement Concrete Roads by the construction agencies
all over country. Details/records are being received regularly and
CMA has been requesting the concerned construction agencies to
take proper quality control measures during construction of cement
concrete roads in their area. A copy of CMA’s publication DOs and
DONTs is also being sent to them. Nodal officers of the concerned
area are also being requested to interact with the construction
agencies and provide them technical assistance.
49th Annual Report
66
ANNEXURE-X
CEMENT INDUSTRY’S COMMENTS ON NOTIFICATIONS
OF THE MOEF AND THE MINISTRY OF MINES
1. Environment Impact Assessment: MoEF Gazette Notification
No. S.O. 195 (E) of 19th January 2009
Clause Statement Problems – Suggestion
Para 2, after sub-para (iii)
However, modernization or expansion proposal without
any increase in pollution load and or any additional water or land requirement are exempted from the provisions of this
Notification.
However, modernization or expansion or change in Raw Mix/ Product Mix
proposal without any increase in pollution level as per prescribed standards or no significant increase in pollution
load and or any additional water or land requirement are exempted from the
provisions of this Notification.
Para 4, sub-
para (iii)
In the absence of any duly
constituted SEIAA or SEAC, a category ‘B’ Project shall be treated as Category ‘A’
Project.
In the absence of any duly constituted
SEIAA or SEAC, a category ‘B’ Project shall be considered at the central level. However, Category ‘B’ projects
are exempt from Scoping for three
years from the date of issue of this
Notification
Para 7, sub-para (ii)
However for expansion projects involving
enhancement of production by more than 50%, holding of public consultation shall be essential and no exemption in this regard
shall be provided.
To add in end – However, expert appraisal Committee may exempt in
some specific cases, depending upon
the scale of impact on the
environment.
Item 1(d) in
Column 5
(ii) Power Plants upto 50
MW, based on non-hazardous municipal waste are exempt.
(iii) Power Plants using waste heat boiler without any auxiliary fuels are exempt.
(ii) To delete the word “non-hazardous”
(iii) Power Plants using waste heat boiler or 15% auxiliary fuel without any
auxiliary fuels are exempt.
Para 10, new
sub-para
Copies of the EC shall be
endorsed to Heads of local bodies, Panchayats, Zila Parishads, Municipal Corporation Local NGO’s
etc.
Involvement of too many NGOs and
Agencies will complicate and delay EC.
For individual Industrial units of
same product and scale in each
state/region, one or two NGO’s
should be identified and a Committee
may be constituted by Nominating
Members from these organisations.
67
Clause Statement Problems – Suggestion
Display of monitored data
on companies website
In absence of a specific format for
display, there will be wide divergences, from display in different regions and there will be confusion in interpretation.
A Core Committee Nominated by CMA
should be authorised to coordinate in
problems and formulate standards
for presentation of data from
different regions.. Display Format of
monitored data on companies
website need be standardized
through consultation with Expert
Agencies.
Compliance Report
Submission to local or Regional office of MoEF
Many regional offices of MoEF are either
very small or without infrastructure, it will delay EC.
This responsibility should lie with the
Head Office of concerned SPCB’s.
Monitoring for Environment Parameters (Both Static and Dynamic) and Display
in Public Domain.
This provision will pose serious problem in absence of identifying Expert Agencies or the Guidelines
The monitoring frequency should be
uniform for all States. The method of
display in public domain needs be
uniform and be developed by MoEF in consultation with Industry
Associations [ e.g., CMA].
Regional Offices of MoEF to monitor implementation of the stipulated conditions
and safeguards stated in the EC letter.
Many regional offices of MoEF are either very small or without infrastructure, this responsibility will delay the process.
This should be the responsibility of
National Environment Protection
Authority (NEPA), which is pending
with MoEF.
2. National Ambient Air quality Standards-Gazette Notification
No. G.S.R 826 (E) of 16th November, 2009
Clause 3 (Table)
Component Periodicity of Measurement
Item 6 Lead – 24 Hrs Item 8 Ammonia – 24 Hrs Item 11 Arsenic – Annual Item 12 Nickel – Annual
These items are not generated or
emitted during manufacture of
cement or cement based products.
Cement industry should be
exempted from these measurements
because monitoring these pollutants
will need highly specialised
equipments and manpower – which
are infractuous.
49th Annual Report
68
3. Fly Ash Notification - Gazette Notification No. S.O. 2804 (E) of
3rd November 2009
Clause Statement Problems – Suggestion
Clause 2(1) In the Sept. 1999 Notification
Will make fly ash available to end users without any payment or any other
consideration for the purpose of manufacturing ash based products such as Cement, Concrete Blocks ……….
This Clause has been eliminated in the new Notification making it obligatory for cement industry to purchase fly ash. The
escalating cost is posing threat of reduction in fly ash use, lesser production of PPC, and diminishing performance of cement industry in mitigation of GHG emission.
Cement Plants manufacturing PPC
should be exempted.
Clause 2 (1A) in November 03,
2009 Notification
Compulsory Uise of Fly Ash in any cement plants
within a radius of 100 kms from a coal or lignite based Thermal Power Plants.
It restricts use of BF Slag an equally hazardous waste generated by steel
plants and use on a larger scale (upto 65% replacement of cement clinker in comparison to upto 35% by Fly Ash) by cement plants located within 100 kms
radius of both steel and thermal power plants. It also takes away the customers’ options of using a type of cement other than PPC.
Plants manufacturing Slag Cement
and located within 100 km of a TPP
should be exempted from this
Clause.
Clause 3 (a) (1)
(ii)
20% of Fly Dry ESP Ash
shall be made available to manufacturers of Fly Ash Bricks, Blocks and Tiles free of charge.
This provision denies the cement plants
its genuine requirement of fly ash from its own captive thermal power plants for use in manufacturing PPC by its own cement plants.
Cement plants with captive thermal
plants and producing PPC should be
exempted from this clause.
4. Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation Act)
- Draft Notice No. 16/57/2005-MVI dated 5th August 2009, Revised Draft 2nd
June 2010
Section/
Page No.
Statement Problems-Suggestion
6/7 Maximum area for
prospecting – 1000 Sq.Km.
Will create unnecessary blocking of large
reserves by single party for trading.
For massive deposits like limestone the
area should be restricted to 50-100
Sq.Km.
Section/
Page No.
Statement Problems-Suggestion
69
Page No.
6(d)/8 For major minerals minimum
area for PL shall be 1.0 Sq.Km.
Will create problems for deposits containing minerals in less than 1.0 Sq.Km.
Should be relaxed for massive and compact deposits of economic minerals.
(6)/8-9 No mining lease shall be
given for an area, which is not compact and contiguous.
Will create problems in case of deposits covering villages at isolated places.
Exemption should be provided for such
cases.
7(4)/10 Period of Grant and
extension of a concession – ML for major minerals not
less than 20 years and not more than 30 years.
Will create problems for captive mines linked
to large scale manufacturing of essential commodities like Cement, Steel, etc.
Should be minimum for guaranteed life
of the plant or 30 years whichever is higher.
13(1)/16 State Govt. may by
Notification invite applications for PL
Will offer scope for non-user outfits at the
cost of genuine mineral based industrial Agencies.
Eligibility criteria should include actual users only.
18 (1) (2)/ 23
Transfer of Mining Lease-
Prior approval needed from Central or State Govt.
Undue delay due to conditionality, e.g., dues or arrears, mine closure compliance.
Should be made easy as in case of RL, LAPL etc.
25/ 40 Conditions of ML – Lessee shall pay to the occupier of
the surface of the land such compensation as may be prescribed.
Will create confusion because of many claimants and may lead to prolonged litigation.
Should be applicable only when letter of
intent for grant of ML has been issued
and it is required to execute mining lease.
32/ 56 Premature Termination of ML Provisions are too draconian and is
detrimental to the development of mineral based industries
Should be reviewed and simplified.
33(2)/ 6 Mine closure Plan Need of consent from several Agencies and
NGOs will complicate the procedures.
Instead of consent, the Panchayat should
be given copy of successive Mine
Closure Plans.
Section/
Page No.
Statement Problems-Suggestion
42(1) /
64
Payment of compensation to
owner of surface rights
It is a highly disputable issue and most often
lead to long-drawn litigation.
49th Annual Report
70
Should be deleted, as current provisions
in relevant State Laws and Rules
regulating grant of ML are adequate.
43(3)-
Annexure
National /State Mineral Fund Industries are already heavily burdened with
levies of diverse types from the State and Central Govt [in addition to Environmental Development, Local Area Development etc.].
Industries need be spared additional
Levies.
Updated Draft Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act – Version
03.06.2010
3(c) (i) &
(ii)
(i) A duty in the nature
of excise & customs levied and collected on major minerals by the Central
Government.
(ii) A duty on royalty levied and collected for major and minor minerals
by the State Govt.
Mining industry is already paying 2 types of
duties – dead rent and royalty as prescribed under the Act. Another duty in the nature of duty of excise and customs on major minerals
should be elaborated for justification.
42(2) (i) (2) The holder of a mining
lease shall, in respect of any person holding occupation or rights of the
surface of the land over which the lease has been granted be, liable to,
(i) Allot free shares equal to 26% through the promoter’s quota or an annuity equal to 26% of the profit (after deduction
of tax).
This should not be included in the
amended Act for follwing reasons :
(a) Cement companies have to acquire large extent of lands over which mining leases
for captive use are granted in various locations. Company may have more than one plant at various locations / State. Allotting of shares to the extent of 26% of
the company to the land owners for the mining lease of each plant is not feasible.
(b) It is also not possible to have separate company for each mining lease, which in
addition to being cumbersome will also involve transfer / sale of mineral to the captive unit.
Section/
Page No.
Statement Problems-Suggestion
(c) Companies also acquire lands for the
purpose of setting up plant, residential
colonies and for other infrastructure
facilities. This will open up the demand
from these land owners also for allotment
71
of shares of the company.
(d) Cement industry is a captive intensive industry and has to arrange finance for the project from financial institutions /
banks, who determine the capital of the company on the basis of debt / equity. In such an event valuation of land of mining lease equal to 26% of the shares of the company is not justified.
(e) Further company is required to pay annuity for the first five years even in case a company has not made any profits
after commencement of mining activity. It will not be acceptable to shareholders as they their capital is at risk as compared to the land owner, who does not have any
risk. The provision is neither feasible nor practical.
24 (1) (c) If any mineral not specified in the lease is discovered in the leased area, the lessee
shall not win and dispose of such mineral unless such mineral is included in the lease or a separate lease is obtained therefor.
This new mineral (except for atomic minerals) is to be included in granted existing Mining Lease, whether lessee requests or not for
inclusion. The commercial value can be decided by lessee and Govt. can get revenue/ royalty as the case may be.
*****
49th Annual Report
72
ANNEXURE-XI
LIST OF CMA PUBLICATIONS
A. Brought out/updated during 2009-10
� Indian Cement Industry - Statistics (2009)
� Cement, Energy and Environment – Quarterly
� Cement News Digest – Weekly
� Cement Journal – Quarterly
� Handbook on Cement Concrete Roads (Revised)
� Construction, Maintenance and Upkeep of Concrete Building
� DOs and DONTs for Cement Concrete Road Construction
� Building Lasting Homes
B. Other Important publications
� Cement Concrete Canal Lining
� Basic Data on Indian Cement Industry
� CMA Directory
� Cement for Construction – A Consumer Guide (In Different Languages – English, Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, Kannada, Punjabi and Gujarati)
� City Concrete Roads …. (Revised, Updated and Enlarged)
� Blended Cement … Portland Pozzolana Cement (A Pamphlet)
� Four Laning of Satara-Kolhapur-Kagal, NH4 (Updated)
� Handbook on Cement Concrete Canal Lining
� Precast Concrete Block Paving
� Fuel Savings on Cement Concrete Pavements
� Concrete Roads - 'Why' & 'How'
� Advances in Concrete Science & Technology
� Concrete Pavements for Toll (BOT) Roads
� Concrete for the Sustainable Development in the 21st Century
� Cement Concrete Roads - Arteries for the 21st Century (A Brochure)
� Global Warming & Cement
� Environment Friendly Cement Industry
� QC – Cement Concrete Roads Mumbai
� Handbook of Ready Mix Concrete
� India's First Access Controlled Expressway - Mumbai-Pune
� City Concrete Roads – Mumbai leads the Way
� Cement Concrete Pavements for City Roads, Bus Stands & Depots
� Cement Concrete Roads for Cities
� Concrete Overlays (White Topping of Roads) – Revised, updated and expanded version
� Widening and Strengthening of Single Lane Roads under NHDP IV – Concrete Pavements Option
� Cement in Service of The Nation
73
MEMBER COMPANIES OF CEMENT MANUFACTURERS’ ASSOCIATION (As on 31.3.2010)
1. Andhra Cements Ltd
Sri Durga Cement Works Sri Durgapuram, Dachepalli-522 414 Guntur Distt. (A.P.)
2. Bagalkot Cement & Inds.Ltd
Stadium House, Block No 1, 6th floor, Veer Nariman Road,
Churchgate. Mumbai - 400 020
3. Binani Cement Ltd
706, Om Towers,
32, Chowringhee Road, Kolkata - 700 001
4. Birla Corporation Ltd
(Cement Division)
Birla Building 9/1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Kolkata 700 001
5. Cement Corporation of India Ltd
(A Govt. of India Enterprise) Scope Complex, Core No. 5 7, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003
6. Cement Manufacturing Co.Ltd
Village Lumshnong, P.S. Khliehriat Dist. Jaintia Hills, Meghalaya – 793 200
7. Century Textiles & Industries Ltd
Century Cement
Maihar Cement
Manikgarh Cement
Century Bhawan Dr. Annie Besant Road, Mumbai 400 025
8. Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd
Rani Seethai Hall Building Post Box No.748, 603, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006
9. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd
Dalmiapuram - 621 651 Distt. Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu
10. Grasim Industries Ltd (Cement Divn.)
Birlagram, Nagda – 456 331, Madhya Pradesh
11. Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd
Siddhigram - 362 276 Off. Veraval Kodinar Highway Taluka Veraval, Distt. Junagarh,
Gujarat 12. Heidelberg Cement India Ltd
P.O. Ammasandra, Distt. Tumkur, Karnataka –572 211
13. HMP Cements Ltd *
‘Fairlie House’ 4, Fairlie Place,
Kolkata 700 001 14. The India Cements Ltd
“Dhun Building’ 827, Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002 15. J.K. Cement Ltd
Kamla Tower Kanpur 208 001,
Uttar Pradesh 16. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd*
P.O. Shripatinagar
CFA - 313 021, Distt. Udaipur, Rajasthan
17. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd
(Cement Division)
Sector – 128, Noida 201 304, (U.P.) 18. Jammu & Kashmir Cements Ltd
(A Govt. of J&K Undertaking) Nawa-I-Subh Complex,
Zero Bridge, P.Box No. 149 Srinagar 190 001
49th Annual Report
74
19. JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd
Jaykaypuram Distt. Sirohi,
Rajasthan 20. The K.C.P. Ltd
Ramakrishna Buildings 2, Dr. P.V. Cherian Crescent
Egmore, Chennai 600 008 21. Kalyanpur Cements Ltd
2 & 3, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Sarani
Kolkata 700 001 22. Kesoram Industries Ltd
Kesoram Cement
Vasavadatta Cement
9/1, R.N. Mukherjee Road, Kolkata 700 001
23. Khyber Industries (P) Ltd
Khayam Road, Nowpora,
Srinagar 190 001 Jammu & Kashmir
24. Lafarge India Pvt. Ltd
Bakhtawar, 14th Floor, 229, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021
25. Madras Cements Ltd
Ramamandiram Rajapalaiyam 626 117, Tamil Nadu
26. Malabar Cements Ltd
(A Govt. of Kerala Undertaking) Walayar P.O., Palakkad Distt. - 678 624, Kerala
27. Mangalam Cement Ltd
Adityanagar, Morak - 326 520 Distt. Kota (Rajasthan)
28. Mawmluh-Cherra Cements Ltd
(A Govt. of Meghalaya Undertaking) Taxation Building, (Near Raj Bhawan) Shillong - 793 001, Meghalaya
29. Meghalaya Cement Ltd
Village Thangskari, P.O. Lumshnong, Distt. Jaintia Hills,
Meghalaya - 793 200 30. My Home Industries Ltd
9th Floor, Block-3, My Home Hub, Madhapur, Hyderabad - 500 081
31. OCL India Ltd
Rajgangpur - 770 017 Distt. Sundergarh, Orissa.
32. Orient Cement
(Prop: Orient Paper & Inds. Ltd) Bhubaneswar – 751 012,
Orissa 33. Panyam Cements & Mineral Inds Ltd
C-1, Industrial Estate, Bommalasatram, Nandyal,
Kurnool Distt., Andhra Pradesh 518 502
34. Penna Cement Inds.Ltd
Plot No.703, Sriniketan Colony,
Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 034
35. Prism Cement Ltd
305, Laxmi Nivas Apartments Ameerpet, Hyderabad 500 016 (A.P.)
36. Rain Commodities Ltd
Rain Centre, 34, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad –500 073 (A.P.)
37. Sanghi Inds.Ltd
Sanghinagar–501 511
R.R.Dist., Andhra Pradesh.
38. Saurashtra Cement Ltd
Near Railway Station, P.O. Ranavav - 360 560, Gujarat
39. Shree Cement Ltd
Bangur Nagar, Post Box No.33, Beawar - 305 901 (Rajasthan)
40. Shree Digvijay Cement Co.Ltd
P.O. Digvijaygram – 361 140 Via Jamnagar, (Gujarat)
41. Shriram Cement Works
(A divn. of DSCL)
75
6th Floor, Kanchenjunga Building, 18, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001
42. Sone Valley Cement Co. Ltd*
Shahi Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Exhibition Road, Patna 800 001, Bihar
43. Tamil Nadu Cements Corp. Ltd
(A Govt. of Tamil Nadu Undertaking) LLA Building, 2nd Floor, 735, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002
44. UltraTech Cement Ltd
‘B’ Wing, Ahura Centre, 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road Andheri (E), Mumbai 400 093
45. Zuari Cement Ltd
(Italcementi Group) Krishna Nagar, Yerraguntla 516 311 Kadapa Distt, Andhra Pradesh
* Plants closed
49th Annual Report
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION
SECRETARIAT
SECRETARY GENERAL Shri N.A. Viswanathan
ACTING SECRETARY Shri S.K. Dalmia JOINT SECRETARY Shri S.V. Joshi Shri G.Y. Narayana Shri N.K. Pande
SR. DY. SECRETARY Shri Jainender Kumar Shri H.K. Panchal
Shri Rakesh Gupta EDP MANAGER Shri Piyuesh Aggarwal EDP OFFICER Shri J. Srinivasan
SR. ASSISTANT SECRETARY Mrs. Inderjeet Kaur ASSISTANT SECRETARY Shri N.S. Pawar Shri C.S. Pant
AUDITORS Messrs K.S. Aiyar & Co. Chartered Accountants
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS’ ASSOCIATION (Website : www.cmaindia.org)
Corporate Office Mumbai Office
CMA Tower,
A-2E, Sector 24,
Noida -201301 (U.P.)
Tel: 0120-2411955, 2411957, 2411958, 2411764
Fax: 0120-2411956
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Express Building, 1st Floor,
Indian Merchants’ Chamber Marg,
Churchgate, Mumbai - 400 020
Tel: 022 -22049691, 22851304
Fax: 022 -22040582
Email: [email protected]
Registered Office
Vishnu Kiran Chamber,
2142-47, Gurudwara Road,
Karol Bagh, New Delhi – 110005
Tel: 011- 28753206, 28751307
Fax: 011-28758476