www.air-worldwide.com effects of strong motion processing procedures on time histories, elastic and...
TRANSCRIPT
www.air-worldwide.com
Effects of Strong Motion Processing Procedureson Time Histories, Elastic and Inelastic Spectra
By Paolo Bazzurro, Brian Sjoberg, Nicolas Luco (AIR)
Walter Silva, Robert Darragh (Pacific Engineering and Analysis)
Presented at
COSMOS INVITED WORKSHOP
ON STRONG-MOTION RECORD PROCESSING
Richmond, CA, May 26-27, 2004
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Motivation
To quantify on a statistical basis the effects on ground motion time histories and elastic and inelastic spectra of
i. Causality of the filter
ii. Filter order
iii. Selection of the high-pass cut-off frequency
iv. Preservation or removal of residual displacement offset
We considered Butterworth filter only Near-source (distance R17km) ground motions from earthquakes with
moment magnitude ranging from 6.5 to 7.6 Two components rotated fault-parallel and fault-normal
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Earthquakes and Recording Stations
Rupture Distance VS30 HP LP Xcos() or DMFEarthquake Year Mag Mechanism (km) Station Name (m/s) (Hz) (Hz) Ycos()Imperial Valley 1979 6.5 S 8.5 Brawley Airport 209 0.10 40 0.7 1.05-1.54
1 El Centro Array #6 203 0.10 40 0.5 1.00-1.08
0.6 El Centro Array #7 211 0.10 40 0.5 1.00-1.08
14.2 Parachute Test Site 349 0.10 40 0.7 1.05-1.54
Loma Prieta 1989 6.9 R (oblique) 6.1 LGPC 466 0.10 0.8 1.04-1.17
Landers 1992 7.3 S 1.1 Lucerne 685 0.08 60 0.63 1.03-1.36
Kobe 1995 6.9 S 10.2 Amagasaki 256 0.10 40 0.57 1.02-.123
0.2 Kobe University 1043 0.10 30 0.42 0.94-0.99
2.5 Port Island (0 m) 198 0.10 0.3 0.76-0.97
1.2 Takarazuka 312 0.13 33 0.64 1.03-1.39
Northridge 1994 6.7 R 6.2 Jensen Filter Plant 373 0.20 0.79 1.04-1.16
7.1 Rinaldi Receiving Stn. 282 0.10 0.77 1.03-1.15
Kocaeli, Turkey 1999 7.4 S 17 Arcelik 523 0.07 50 0.26 0.71-0.96
12.7 Duzce 276 0.08 15 0.51 1.10-1.10
17 Gebze 792 0.08 25 0.23 0.68-0.96
4.8 Izmit 811 0.10 30 0.02 0.46-0.92
2.6 Yarimca 297 0.07 50 0.11 0.55-0.94
Chi-Chi, Taiwan 1999 7.6 R 4.4 TCU049 N/A 0.02 30 0.62 1.00-1.03
0.2 TCU052 N/A 0.04 50 0.61 1.00-1.02
1.1 TCU068 N/A 0.03 50 0.62 1.00-1.03
Additional Records List
Kocaeli, Turkey 1999 7.4 S 3.1 Sakarya 471 0.04 40 0.19 0.63-0.95
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Processing Techniques
Legend:AvailableNot Available
* Parallel component only
Ea
rth
qu
ak
e
Sta
tio
n N
am
e
Ca
sca
de
Aca
usa
l 2
-po
le/2
-po
le
Ca
sca
de
Aca
usa
l - 1
.5xH
P 2
-po
le/2
-po
le
Ca
sca
de
Aca
usa
l 2-p
ole
/3-p
ole
Aca
usa
l 4-p
ole
Aca
usa
l - 1
.5xH
P 4
-po
le
Aca
usa
l 5-p
ole
Ca
usa
l 4-p
ole
Ca
usa
l - 1
.5xH
P 4
-po
le
Ca
usa
l 5-p
ole
Sta
tic
Imperial Valley Brawley Airport H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR H-BRA053.ATR
El Centro Array #6 H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR H-E06053.ATR
El Centro Array #7 H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR H-E07053.ATR
Parachute Test Site H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR H-PTS053.ATR
Loma Prieta LGPC LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR LGP038.ATR
Landers Lucerne LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR LCN175.ATR
Kobe Amagasaki AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR AMA230.ATR
Kobe University KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR KBU230.ATR
Port Island (0 m) PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR PRI230.ATR
Takarazuka TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR TAZ230.ATR
Northridge Jensen Filter Plant J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR J EN122.ATR
Rinaldi Receiving Stn. RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR RRS122.ATR
Kocaeli, Turkey Arcelik ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR ARC000.ATR
Duzce DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR DZC180.ATR
Gebze GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR GBZ000.ATR
Izmit IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT090.ATR IZT004.ATR
Yarimca YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT000.ATR YPT004.ATR
Sakarya* SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR SKR090.ATR
Chi-Chi, Taiwan TCU049 TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR TCU049-N.ATR
TCU052 TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR TCU052-N.ATR
TCU068 TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR TCU068-N.ATR
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Response to Butterworth Filters of Different Orders
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Inelastic Displacement Response Spectra – What’s R?
max (inelastic)
(R = 4)
max (elastic)
max
Earthquake Accelerogram
Displacement Response
Time History(Tn = 1.0 sec)
Displaced Structure
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
-10-505
101520
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Displacement
Base Shear
max (elastic)
max (inelastic)
dy = max (elastic) / R
dy
Yield Strength
Single-Degree-of-FreedomStructure
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of Causality of the Filter
R=1 (Elastic)
Bandwidth for cascade acausal filter
Bandwidth upper bound for causal filter
Bandwidth upper bound for acausal filter
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of Causality of the Filter
R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of Filter Order: 4-pole vs. 5-pole Causal
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of Filter Order: 4-pole vs. 5-pole Acausal
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of Filter Order: 2p-2p vs. 2p-3p Acausal
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of HP cut-off frequency: fHP vs. 1.5fHP --- 4-pole Causal Filter
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of HP cut-off frequency: fHP vs. 1.5fHP --- 4-pole Acausal Filter
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of HP cut-off frequency: fHP vs. 1.5fHP --- 2p-2p Cascade Acausal Filter
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
~5s 1.5s
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of HP cut-off frequency: fHP vs. 1.5fHP --- 2p-2p Cascade Acausal Filter
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
0.5s 2.0s
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of HP cut-off frequency: fHP vs. 1.5fHP --- 2p-2p Cascade Acausal Filter
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
1.0s 3.0s
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Effects of Residual Displacement
R=1 (Elastic) R=8 (Severely Inelastic)
Notes: 1) normal components 2) 6 records only 3) Results for causal filters are similar
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Summary of Effects of Processing Techniques on Elastic and Inelastic Spectra
In general, effects are larger for inelastic than for elastic spectra and for longer periods at any given response level (i.e., R=1 through 8)
Causality of the filter does not systematically affect the amplitude of the spectra. The statistical impact on spectra due to the filter order is negligible Increasing the value of the HP cut-off frequency, fHP, generates inelastic spectra
that are systematically lower at periods much lower than 1/ fHP regardless of the causality of the filter. This can be in part explained by the lengthening of the effective period of vibration of structures in the post-elastic regime.
Records with residual displacement offset preserved generate inelastic response spectra that are consistently higher than those caused by records with offset removed. (Phenomenon observed for 6 fault-normal records only).
NOTE: See paper for effects on spectra caused by applying a filter to simulated ground motion records
© 2004 AIR Worldwide Corporation COSMOS WORKSHOP
Summary of Effects of Processing Techniques on Ground Motion TH’s
In general, effects are significant for PGD and, to a lesser extent, for PGV. The impact on other parameters (e.g., PGA, Arias Intensity, and duration) is negligible.
Causally filtered records have PGV and PGD values that are, on average, smaller (by 5-10% and 5-15%, respectively) than those of acausally filtered ones.
Acausally filtered records generally display a more prominent ramp of increasing displacement prior to the onset of strong-motion than causally filtered records. Peak-to-peak displacement amplitude, however, is similar for each processing technique.
The filter order does not affect the ground motion parameters considered here. Increasing the value of the HP cut-off frequency, fHP, generates records with
lower PGV and PGD values (5% and 15-20%, respectively), as expected. The values of PGV and PGD are considerably larger (5-20% and 50-60%,
respectively) in records with residual static offset preserved, as expected.