y imblms - nasa

46
- .2 SPACE DIVISION GE NO. 70SD5414 C Y LE IMBLMS PN1SE14 ADDITIONAL TASKS TASK 4.0 General Purpose Bioamplifier Study FINAL REPORT IMBLMS Contract MAS 9-10741 Phase B4 GENERAL ® ELECTRIC

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jun-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Y IMBLMS - NASA

- .2

S P A C EDIVISION GE NO. 70SD5414

CY

LE

IMBLMSPN1SE14

ADDITIONAL TASKSTASK 4.0

General Purpose Bioamplifier StudyFINAL REPORT

IMBLMS

Contract MAS 9-10741Phase B4

G E N E R A L ® ELECTRIC

Page 2: Y IMBLMS - NASA

GE No. 70SD5414

FINAL REPORT

IMBLMS PHASE B 4

ADDITIONAL TASKS

TASK 4.0: GENERAL

PURPOSE BIOAMPLIFIER STUDY

CONTRACT NAS9-10741

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.SPACE DIVISION

Page 3: Y IMBLMS - NASA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENERAL PURPOSE BIOAMPLIFIER STUDY

SECTION PAGE

I. INTRODUCTION 1

II. MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS 4

III. INPUT DEVICES 10

1. ELECTRODES 10

2. TRANSDUCERS 13

IV. AMPLIFIER REQUIREMENTS 21

1 . GAIN 21

2. BANDWIDTH 21

3. NOISE 22

4. DYNAMIC RANGE 22

5. COMMON MODE REJECTION 23

6. SWITCHING TECHNIQUES 25

7. SAFETY DEVICES (BGLS) 26

8. BUFFERING 26

9. INPUT IMPEDANCE 30

V. AMPLIFIER SPECIFICATIONS 30

VI. DEDICATED VS. GPA TRADE STUDIES 32

1. COMPLEXITY 33

2. RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITYAND FLEXIBILITY 35

3. COST 37

VII. RECOMMENDATIONS 42

Page 4: Y IMBLMS - NASA

I. INTRODUCTION

During the course of the definition and preliminary design phases of

IMBLMS (Integrated Medical, Behaviorial and Laboratory Measurement System)

it became obvious that a large number of physiological signal conditioners

would be required to implement the measurements desired for optimum system

usefulness in extended space flight. Many of these signal conditioners had

similar attributes in that they received small physiological potentials as

an input from some form of electrode connected to the subject and amplified

this input to several volts for display and/or subsequent analysis and stor-

age by a data handling system. The signal conditioners defined above are

termed biopotential amplifiers. The measurements concerned are EEG

(electroencephalography), EMG (electromyography), EOG/ENG (alectrooculo-

graphy/electronystagmography), ECG (electrocardiography), and VCG,

(Vectorcardiography). The question arises as to whether or not a single

signal conditioner design could not be used for all of the above measure-

ments and if so, would it be desirable to use such a signal conditioner in

IMBLMS. While the measurements described above require signal conditioners

which are similar, there are still significant differences in the manner

in which the measurements are actually implemented. For example, in the

case of ECG, not only must the signal conditioner accept the input from a

pair of electrodes, it must also provide for switching from one set of

electrodes to another (i.e., various lead configurations). The VCG signal

conditioner must provide three outputs properly weighted and phased for a

correct representation of the three components of the vector potential

of the heart. Other dissimilarities which must be considered are: different

electrodes for different measurements (hence different input requirements

on the signal conditioner), wide ranges of input signals (10 uv to 10 mv)

Page 5: Y IMBLMS - NASA

and differing bandwidths (DC to 1 KHz).

In order to properly assess whether a general purpose amplifier (GPA) is more

desirable than a series of dedicated amplifiers for use in IMBLMS, it is

first necessary to define such a general purpose amplifier and ascertain

whether its design would be within the present state-of-the-art. The tech-

nique chosen to define the GPA is to determine its requirements based on

known inputs and outputs and to create a set of specifications for its

major characteristics. These specifications can then be used to perform

a trade-off study of the GPA versus dedicated amplifiers in the IMBLMS.

Figure 1-1 represents the above study organization in block diagram form.

-2-

Page 6: Y IMBLMS - NASA

jgZ2 Ou -

to

LU

CfLU0£

UJ

£

UJ

COOI—i

QCI—LU tOU •—iO QCa LU

too

LU tOa >-,o oc.f)g ^J

&d

oMH

CJ

S

isi

oMfa

-3-

Page 7: Y IMBLMS - NASA

II. MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS

In order to determine for what measurements a GPA could potentially be

used in the IMBLMS, the Phase- B-4 Measurement Requirement Sheets (MRS) were

analyzed and the pertinent electrical characteristics were extracted to

serve as a basis for defining some of the electrical characteristics of the

GPA. A list of the selected measurements appears as Figure n-i and a. table

of the pertinent electrical characteristics appears as Table n-l.

It is clear from the list of electrical characteristics that the GPA must be

capable of operating as a differential amplifier having a common mode reject-

ion (CMR) of better than 100 dB and an input impedance of greater than 40

megohms. It must be capable of resolving signals as small as 10 uvolts and

must have an input noise no greater than 5 uvolts peak to peak from .2 to

1000 Hz. DC response is required for temperature, GSR/BSR and blood

pressure.

Although output requirements are not given as part of the measurement

requirements, it will be assumed that a full scale output of +10 volts is

desired and the gains required of the GPA can thus be determined.

-4-

Page 8: Y IMBLMS - NASA

CMI

a:ooo

on. onLU LUo o=> =5O OOO OO

oo ooogo

ao

O

Oa.ooeo

OOOO

ona.

ooooona.

oS

ooUJa§oLU

OO 00 OOLU LU LUa a ao o o

CJUJ

LU

8

Of.oto

oo

oco

oo

a:

a:r>oo

sCOCJa.

O)s-

Sa:oo

8LU

C3oh-4

oa:osoLU

UJ

o Su 8

5oonm

8i—ioon<cCJo

ao

oHUM

C£=> UJoo on00 =3LU OOon ooa. LUa a.8 o—I OCO O_l_l CO

i-i 00on =3LU O

on LU

O^ W8 "03

COOi—iaon<toooo

CO

a.LUo

oon

CDo

ccCJ

8oo

s

oo

ooI—Ioo

ooCJ

CD

Q.

oo

oon

-5-

Page 9: Y IMBLMS - NASA

0

uj,13O*wpLJ

WNHCO

i_3

^gHCO

COOMH

H05

13U<*pq3£33G

H£5M

§SW*•"•>W^3Hj2

H

MyM

2*— >w

1

Na0o•—4

1in0

co4J

1— 1o^•r-4

i— 1

i— 1

•r-l

g

CO1o

gVlo

M-l

<D

cfl

CU

•H4-1•r-l4-1

CUCLCU

•r-4

#\

CJ•r-l

COCfl

43Q.

pq

8w

Npr]

OO|—4

|

LO

o'

co4-1r-lO

^'.-I

1— 1

•r-l

gCO

1o

gMO

M-l

CUr>cfl

Q)>r-l

4Jr-l4-1

CUCL<uVl

*.

CJi-l

CO

CO

CLr-l

pq

OCJ

N Na ao oCN Oi m

-H 1

• OCO N

cu ai— i »*43 N Ocfl a o4J 0CJ O «CU CO r-4

r^ 1 1

cu o t-iCO —1 •

iii

VlCJ Cfl•H r-4

0 3cfl OVi coO co

43 >IJ I

OCU -r-l

43 T34-J Vl

CO43 CJ00

0 £Vl

43 T34-1 CU

COco 3C CO0 0

•rH

4J >s (3co 4J OVl -r-l -H

43 r* 4-1•r-l CO CJ> CJ CO

OO43

oPH

1 1

1 1

1 1

oooa CNai g

0oin inCN r-4

1 1O O

X™\ -»*"N

oooPH C Ja1 g

oom mCN r-l

i io o0 >,

•rH 13r CO

CJ 0)^ 4JU CO

N^ N-X

cu cuVi M3 3CO COCO COcu cu<^ 1^

Cfl•H

01 CO4-1 3Vl O< 13

CUQ> >J_l3 (UCO Vlco 3CU COVl CO

PH CUVi

T) PH0O *"Or-l O

pq O

Na iO 1om ii

mo

*

co•H

<C Vl COCO -r-l

Vl r^ X0 3 <

•T 00

s •§ oc

CN • -r-l• o S

0 CD0) CO •CO ~^ O

^^ rrj QJg Cfl COCJ Vl

gO CO CJ. o

CO • CO.

4*1 Q4J _|_ IQ

• CO 10 • O

V4COr-l

Q) 343 O4-1 -H

VlC 4J0 C

CUCO >CQ >.

•rH 43

4J

CO T3Vl 0)CU CJr^ 3CU T30 0U VlCO 0,

4-1 COC3 co C3cfl cd O4-1 g -r-l•— 1 4J3 >> UCO T3 CUcu o '""iPj 43 CU

gCOVi000

•r-l

T3

Vl

CO0o4-1CO•I-lI-l1— 1

COpq

Naoor-H

o4-1

CN*

^3.ooCN

10— 1

c*Vlo

>4-4cu^§<u^•i-44J•rH4JCUdicuVI

#1

CJ•I-lCOcfl430.

•r-lpq

ow

N

ooo

•s

1-11

m*

g

m10

gpo

14-4CU£>cfl

gT3

COVl

f*

CJ•I-lcoctf

CL•Hpq

o

N

ooi—4

1, — 1

*

CL1a.>

^1

J>rj"

oI— 1

gVioCU>cfl

CU

•H4J•r-l4JCUa,cuVl*l

CJ

COcflJla

•Hpq

8

Nar-4

1o

^s

oor-l

1

ocui

g0•aacfl

v^x

<uCJ

Cfl4JCO

•rHCOCUVl

C•H

CO

(3•r-l

CU00 /-s(3 CUCO >

.-

PJCOpqN-/

PH

O

1

1

1

1

1

1

COVlcuo3

T3COccflVl4-1

cO

4Jc.cu•acua.cuQ

(UVl

4JCOVl(Ua.1H

§ cocu

M THM-l Vl

COCO >cu

•H Pi!Vl COcd pq

co O4-1c at

•rH ,CO 4Ja.

CO•a Mcu 3

4-1 Uo ocu o

i-4<U J2co G

•HO ,C

C OCUcu o<S o

4-J 4JCU

O UHO

CUCJ CUC OCO C4-1 COCO 4J

•r-l COCO -r-lCU COVi a)

OH0)

43 —I4J co

•rH CO

cu cu00 .£C 4JCO

43 coU -rl

CO *""&

CO CO•rH pq

\_^0)CO CUC Oo clO. cflCO 4-1CU COPi TH

COC cu

co 0•r-l •

O ^ CO•H CO g

Sr-4-S

> cd

cd cfl OO « rM

CtJCOpq

CO> &

OH <tCO I

O4J

COo

gVl

4-4

-b-

Page 10: Y IMBLMS - NASA

Has5

"goHO

sw

woaQ

gawu0rf|Tio

.j^3

gHCrt

PdC^aW

s

H

BaH

HapEJ

^J

§

^

1a

r-l

toI — 1 ^|

cfl Og GH ,0o <:a<-^ a-

IT> O. ,__)

V V

^oi

00CUg

Osfr

f\

oow

COgto og C0 <Ca<.j ^

m o

V V

*s^

0vl-I

r-l

00

Ogo

K

oo>

a

i-i<DO3

13CO

CO

4J

o4JC0)

e0.CD

j^<u03

CO

cfl

4J

CO

c0)

T3C01CL

OOr&

Ci)CJPU

1 'I I

I I

I |

I i

I I

i I

1 I

I I

r-4

•H COJ.| rj

cu o4J fjs-i cu< p»

(1) 0)

3 3CO COCO COa) cu£ i13 13O O0 0r-l r-lPQ PQ

1

1

I

I

I

I

1

|

|

g

00O

"O

CO0O4-1CO•r-lr-li— 1

CflPQ

"

a.m

Wo|

"•

m

•4-tM-J*.H•0

*bOCUg

O1— 1

ow

"3,

"

g

ft

\^^

^^

^>

O

1r— 1

.

M-4MH•H-a

•bO0)g

0

O

H

•<

a.

^

^t^^\^ _^^K/*

O

1<— 1

.14-1M-l•r-l13

bOQJg

O

oo

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

x~ \(V,

PQN--'

PienO•*:

1

ii

iii

toi-icuo3

13CO

CO

4J

CO

4-1C01

13p^

g.

_«_

0)M34JCfl}_l01D.gcuH

-7-

Page 11: Y IMBLMS - NASA

s0

HCJ

3 T13 Edy] fV[

3 rJUPOa

§H

OHCOt— 1poHa0

fn[JL|

o1

1-3[_- l

§

EdCO23

8CO

orf

e&1Edoj

HSH2

g1=1CO

^

XIT3

OOr— 1

g*r— 1

43•am

N CEC cfl

0 5 PC0r-4 0) <t

M r-lCO) O •

e0) 4-1> o cdco a4J 4JO N Cfl0 PC 43

~-~ 4-143 mT> o e• oO S-ir-^ (O; m

NEC

0CT>1

o-r— 1

•om

*+ 1

oo

J3T3

OOr— I

g>°r-l

•aro

N C!EC cfl

0 w KOr— 1 0) <f

r l i— 1e .

0) 4-1> O cflcC C4-1 4JO M Cfl0 EC 4=^ 4-J43 mTD CO EC

• 00 M^

N

Oo>

1r— 1

T3

in+ 1

8

|

!

g^oCN

(U>CO4JCJO

""O

VO

N

NN O EC

* 0 0O ^ r-lOO\ 43 43

1 T3 rQoCN CO CO

43 W Vl•a co cuift C^ S

• a. o+ 1 3 1-1

oCJX}£>

7?CJ

1 11 11 1

1 11 11 1

1 11 1

1 1

1 11 11 1

r-l

CO•H CO

a o•u CM 0)•< ><1) d>r-l S-I3 3CO COCO CO<D Q)

CX| fX|

•a T3o o0 0

i-4 r-l

|

11

I11

NEC

Oor-l

<SJ

0)

CO4-1oo

• ^

43

Or— 1

NEC

OOr-l

11— 1

43

m

+1

eCO

00of-lTJM

cOO04-1CO•r-li-lr-l

A

43•aooI— 1

B*2CN

NEC

O

(Sj0)

CO4JCJ0

•x^^

43

Or-l

NEC

OON

1CN

43

m

+ 1

aEdEd

43T3

OOr— 1

B"2CN

N)aoor-4

&

cucO4-1CJO

""v

43-oOr-l

N

OOa\i

in

43•om+ 1

o

43•O

OOr— 4

S"2CN

NEC

OOr-l

<3j0)

cfl4-1Oo

43T3

Or— 1

NaO

r-l

43

in+1

oO

iii

iii

iii

i

/f^cdCOpq

erfco

$

|

|

|

||

|i

1

|

cu(-1

4JCOM0)0.

H

-8-

Page 12: Y IMBLMS - NASA

§H

BOM£n£3

8HPMS3H

(V*

WMfnMJP-<

5

COHOS3

EHM>BHCOS3UCO

HS3

M

gCO

§

r-l

cd•r-{4-1COlJ»lO)

M-l<4-l•r-lQ

cx1cx

3,

Oi— i

5«CNi— 1

Oow

1— 1cd•r-i4JCOl^4Ol

M-lM-l

Q

3.

m•CMi— 1

Ou

T3Ol

*OC01101

1— 160C•H

111

1

I

Oo£

oP-.

.JOlu3

CO

cdV44-1

Co4J

OJ

£j

01cx&

1 11 11 1

g

LT) 1• |

+'

cd•H CO

O) O

J-i CO<! >01 0)r-l r-l3 3CO COCO CO01 01

fL| (ZLt

T3 *O0 OO Or-l t-l

PQ PQ

COr-l

0)U3•oCOCcdS-l4JCo4J

0)

C0)ex&

t i ii i ii i i

£-" uII CO II U

•H OlCO S^CN CO CO•r-l <! . -r-lx o x -a<j Li 0) <i CO

CO CO J-IM <-> ~~^ Ho 3 e o n"1 60 B COCO C -HOa <; ^ a •

s

00o

•HT3r-lcdoo4-1CO•r-lr-lI-l

COPQ

I-lcd•H4J

0)

0)M-lM-l•HQ

cx1cx

£..,

a.in

or-4

0

Pd

r-4cd•H4-1CO)

O)

M-l•r-lQ

cx1cx....,

3-

1

3

o1-1

ow

r-4cd•r-l4JC01r-l01

M-l•r-lQ

cx1cx

^*FJJ

oI-l

IT)•

ror— 1

oou

I-lcO•r-l4-1C01

01M-4M-l•r-lQ

11

id

••

ftjcoN-/

rt

1

ft.1uj3

T3CO

cdM4-1

Co4-1C0)•oC01cxOlQ

111

111

O)

4-1cOr-lO)cx

H

-9-

Page 13: Y IMBLMS - NASA

III. INPUT DEVICES

In order to provide a more intensive study of the input requirements of

the GPA various types of transducers and electrodes were evaluated to

determine their output characteristics.

1. ELECTRODES

The input impedances recommended in the MRSs is based on the

use of a floating type wet electrode. The impedance of this electrode is

typically less than 10, 000 ohms but may vary from 1 to 40, 000 ohms over

reasonable measurement periods (less than 8 hours). In an attempt to de-

fine the input characteristics which might be encountered by multi-parameter

bio-potential amplifier, the characteristics of several other types of electrodes

are presented. However, after only a superficial look into the literature, the

task becomes much more involved than originally anticipated. In an attempt

to simplify this involved task, electrodes will be classed in three broad

types. The specification typical for each type will be presented as well as

the usual use of each type, i.e. , which type of electrode is used for each

bio-potential measurement.

Some electrodes will not specifically be suited for manned space application,

but in the interest of completeness, they too are mentioned.

To begin the classification of electrodes, the first step would be to try to

define what the electrode looks like from the amplifier. Two popular and

generalized versions of equivalent circuits for electrode skin interfacesI

are shown below: I 1 I"

(A)

Page 14: Y IMBLMS - NASA

The voltage E is the half cell potential generated by the electrode. The

half cell potential is generated by the metals in the electrode and the

electrolysis of the skin or the electrode paste.

The classification of electrodes chosen for our purposes has three general

categories:

• Wet

• Dry

• Insulated

Wet electrodes are considered to be any electrode which uses conductive

material to reduce the surface resistance. This material may be artificial

i.e., jelly, paste, etc. or natural, i.e., tissue fluids made by injury.

Dry electrodes are those types of electrodes which do not purposely try to

reduce the surface resistance by the addition of some conducting medium.

Insulated electrodes are those which place an insulating material between the

conducting surface and the electrode. Each of these large divisions can be

further broken down into different application methods within each division.

The largest division is the wet which traces its origin back to the 1800"s

when the ECG's were recorded from subjects who had their bare feet and hands

immersed in buckets of saline. This type of electrode has progressed to the

type NASA calls semi-wet which is a very thin layer of electrolyte (approxi-

mately 10M Ringers Solution), over the electrode surface. Of the wet electrodes,

there are three basic types: non-floating, floating, and invasive. Non-floating

electrodes are those which have direct contact with the skin surface. These

electrodes sit over a skin site which has been prepared by removal of the corni-

fied skin layer or saturation with an electrolyte. Another approach to this

type of electrode is to spray the skin with silver or some other metallic

conductor and then attach the lead wire by some gluing mechanism to this

metallic surface,making these silver spot terminals on the subject.

-11-

Page 15: Y IMBLMS - NASA

Floating electrodes are by far the most widely used. With this type of

electrode, the electrode surface rides on a layer of electrolyte which has

contact with skin surface. The electrode is then held in place by masking the

surface. The present NASA electrode is of this type. A variation of this

method is the use of an electrolyte which will also serve as the mastic for

electrode attachment. This was the type of electrode used in B-3 for the EEC.

The Adey cap also uses a modified floating electrode. In this case, the

electrode surface interfaces with a sponge impregnated with electrolyte and

the sponge touches the skin surface. This technique has been found very

effective for EEC recording.

Invasive electrodes are those which overcome the high cornified epithelial

resistance by penetrating it. These electrodes are usually called pin and

needle electrodes and pierce the skin from .1 mm to 4 cm. A rather good in-

vasive electrode was one designed from a common Nut Meg grader. The sharp

grating surface was placed against the skin and pressed. The small projection

penetrated the cornified layer and made a good low resistance electrode.

Figures III-l-l and III-l -2 and Table III-l -1 are given in an attempt to define

some characteristics, of wet electrodes which an all purpose amplifier might

encounter.

Dry electrode information is somewhat more limited than the information on wet

electrodes, since they are not in general use and the characteristics listed

are from only one source.

ELECTRODE

SILVER SCREEN

USE

EGG

IMPEDANCE

20K - 10 M fL

As with the dry electrodes, the information below is from one source:

ELECTRODEALUMINUM/ ALUMINUM OXIDE

USEEGG

d.c.400 M-T1

CAPACITANCE

5000 pF @ 50 Hz

-12-

Page 16: Y IMBLMS - NASA

Both the dry and capacitive electrodes use buffers. A circuit diagram of

a typical circuit is included as Figure III-l-3.

1-

p-

— _ _OHMIC

.^CONNECTIONh .J

IN 2067 J

IN 2067 2

— . — _ —

/O*—V /

p_4_ <

k, <

~ "»

' 1

2N 3822 111 |•

I I i '1 1I 3UF ' '? 4 . 7 K 1 I I

i : ;

+ VOLTS^ |6-9V)

SIGNAL~* OUTPUT

(1MV)

SHIELD

FIGURE UI-1 -3. TYPICAL, BUFFERED ELECTRODE

These buffers can also be used with wet electrodes with the advantage that they

provide a constant low impedance source to the signal conditioner. Also the

input current of the signal conditioner is no longer of importance, since the

current drawn from the electrode is determined by the buffer.

2. TRANSDUCERS

For the sake of completeness, the transducers required for temperature,

blood pressure, GSR/BSR and ballistocardiogram were examined and some typical

outputs determined.

Typical transducer output characteristics are given below for the type of

measurement specified in the paragraph heading. These characteristics are to

be considered typical as well as the transducer type given as an example. In

some cases more sensitive transducers are required, but these parameters should

be near those chosen as an example.

-13-

Page 17: Y IMBLMS - NASA

CO

Bwl->«pco

OH

OW

W* O

•JJ

nJ

O FuM Ob-i

CO

HCO

WHU

adu

u

ex

Pn

U

Q

-14-

Page 18: Y IMBLMS - NASA

u£HDaw

w

WU

QHPH

W

8UWJw

HaJDO

Q

Ou

u

-15-

Page 19: Y IMBLMS - NASA

TABLE III-1-1

ELECTRODE TYPE USERESISTANCE

D.C. A.C.

NON-FLOATING

Grater (Large)

Grater (Small)

Metalized Skin

EGG

EGG (Chest)

EGG

2-10K

6K.H-

,300.n-

50K

FLOATING

Plate

Cup

Beckman

Silvered Nylon

Silver Spheres

EGG (leg)

ECG, EMG

EGG, EMG

EMG

EEC (Exposed Cortex)

2-10K

2-7K

.5-2K.TL.

100K

JC10K

,300 -

INVASIVE

Needle

Micro-Needle

Cutting

EEC, EMG

Single Cell

Subcutaneous EMG,ECG

See Figure 2

-16-

Page 20: Y IMBLMS - NASA

a. Skin Temperature Measurement

To measure skin temperature two types of transducers were selected:

thermistor and thermocouples.

Thermistor Characteristics:

Output Resistance - Low (10K to 50K)

Signal Level - High

Accuracy - High

Noise Level - Low

The impedance (resistance) of the thermistor varies with temperature

in a non linear manner but can be linearized and accurately calibrated

over the temperature range of concern. A bridge arrangement is re-

commended. External excitation is required (+5 volts). The bridge

output can best be measured differentially. Output impedance can be

in the 10 to 50K ohm range with output voltage signals of 0.5 to 1.0

volts. Self heating effects of the thermistor must be minimized.

The sensor package is light, small in size, rugged in construction.

Typical Vendors - YSI, VECO, FENWAL.

Thermocouples

Output Resistance - Very low

Signal Level - Low

Accuracy - High

Noise Level - Low

The output voltage of the thermocouple varies with temperature. Using

a chromel-constantan junction and a cold junction (0°C) an output of

1.26 mv can be obtained at 70°F and 2.27 mv at 110°F. The output is

accurate, repeatable and linear. Care must be taken that additional

junctions are not built into the sensing loop or if a reference is not

used, that ambient changes be compensated. Use of a differential

amplifier is recommended.

-17-

Page 21: Y IMBLMS - NASA

The sensor package is small in size, rather fragile and very light.

Typical Vendors: OMEGA.

b. Ear Canal Temperature Measurement

The ear canal temperature measurements will use a transducer similar

to skin measurement task except for the form factor of the sensor.

c. Galvanic Skin Response (G,S,R.)

To measure the resistance or change in resistance of the subject's

surface resistance, a transducer, as such, is not required. A bridge

type arrangement will be used using three known resistance values

with the fourth leg the subject's skin.

Transducer - None

Bridge Characteristics

Output Resistance - Low (<10K)

Signal Level - High

Accuracy - High

Noise Level - Low

The G.S.Ro measurement can be made through the use of a resistance

bridge arrangement. Three legs will be accurate resistances while the

fourth is the area under measurement. An accurate shunting resistance

can be used in the fourth leg to set the differential output near null.

d. Ballistocardiogram

To measure low level body movements two types of transducers are

required: angular and linear accelerometers.

Accelerometer Characteristics

-18-

Page 22: Y IMBLMS - NASA

Angular Output Impedance - 10K to 20K

Signal Level - 10V/Rad/Sec2

Noise - Low -50 mv

Linear Output Impedance - Low (1 ohm)Signal Level - HighNoise - Low < 5 mv

The selection of other proper accelerometers may be governed by size and

sensitivity. However, in general, their outputs will be in the ranges

specified. Examples are given below:

Linear Accelerometer - Gulton Ind. Series III

Excitation - 15 volts, 400 Hz, 0.5 wattOutput - 4 volts full scale into 4.3K ohmsOutput Imp. - 1600 ohmsRange - +0.1G to +100G

Angular Accelerometer - SystronDonner 4525

Excitation - +45 VDCOutput - +20 voltsOutput Imp. - 14K ohmsNoise - 50 mv rmsRange - 2 rad/sec2 to 50 rad/Sec2

Arterial Blood Pressure

To measure the arterial blood pressure a displacement transducer is

typically used.

Measurement - Pressure (0 - 300 mm Hg)

Transducer - Volume Displacement

Characteristics

Output Resistance 200 ohmsSignal Level 50 mv/Vin/cmHg

Accuracy - HighNoise - LowExcitation - 5-7 VDCVendor - Statham Mod. P23

The output of the pressure transducer varies as a function of the blood

pressure and excitation voltage. A zero balance must be obtained at cabin

or environmental pressure. The pressure range is from 0 to 300 mm Hg.

with normal output of .0 to 11 millivolts.

-19-

Page 23: Y IMBLMS - NASA

The transducer is small and light weight.

e. Venous Blood Pressure

Venous blood pressure measurements will be similar to the

arterial except for the use of a catheter in place of the cuff.

-20-

Page 24: Y IMBLMS - NASA

IV. AMPLIFIER REQUIREMENTS

1. Gain

The input dynamic range of the GPA must be capable of handling signals from

10'-v to 5 mv for biopotentials and 10/,v to 25 mv for transducer outputs.

As shown in the summary of transducer characteristics there are some trans-

ducers which are capable of delivering volts of usable output and it is

assumed the GPA would not be required if such transducers were chosen.

For the case of biopotential amplifiers, a signal somewhere in the spread

of expected variations is chosen as a reference and this signal is then

amplified to provide a nominal one volt output, e.g. for EGG 1 mv input

equals 1 volt output for a gain of 1000. The signal chosen is typical of

an expected "normal" signal. If we assume, therefore, that EEG represents

a reasonable lower limit we can choose 50>/v input equals 1 volt output

for a gain of 2 X 10 . Since transducers are normally scaled to provide

full scale output for full scale input to insure greatest accuracy and we

have assumed +10 volts as an output signal spread, the upper limit of trans-10

ducer inputs gives us the lowest gain required, e.g. 25 X 10"3 = 400.

Therefore the GPA must be capable of providing gains ranging from 400 to

20,000 and must provide this capability without exceeding the dynamic range

of any of its stages of amplification.

2. Bandwidth

The bandwidth of the GPA must be capable of being switched depending on the

measurement being performed (See Section IV-6). Overall bandwidth with no

limitations will be DC to 1000 Hz (3 db). Switching of passive components

will be used to limit this bandwidth in order to improve signal to noise

without sacrificing an acceptable output. For example, a clinically acceptable

-21-

Page 25: Y IMBLMS - NASA

electrocardiogram can be achieved using a bandwidth from .14 Hz to 40 Hz;

however, for accurate quantitative measurements an upper limit of 100 Hz

is desired (some investigators insist on 500 Hz). The penalty paid for the

increased bandwidth is increased high frequency noise content in the output

signal.

3. Noise

The input noise requirement for the GPA is dictated by the measurement

requiring the greatest sensitivity with the maximum bandwidth. Looking at

Table II-l we see that EMG will provide us with the requirement of 5 ><v p-p

noise over a bandwidth of .5 to 1000 Hz. Attaining this low a noise over

such a broad bandwidth is a state-of-the-art requirement. By restricting

the high frequency cut-off to 100 Hz, 5/*v p-p can be obtained consistently

by using low noise junction FETS in the input stages.

For DC measurements utilizing transducers we are more interested in DC

stablility versus time and temperature than we are in actual noise since

the sensitivity and frequency requirements are reasonably moderate. Once

again using matched junction FETS drifts of 10 /<V/°C and 100^V/hr are

attainable. These figures can be reduced by almost an order of magnitude

using more sophisticated techniques for selecting and matching devices.

4. Dynamic Range

As discussed previously under Gain, the GPA must be capable of handling

signals from 10/<v to 25 mv with a +10 volt output swing. This corresponds

to an input dynamic range of approximately 70 db. In order to handle the

gains required (400 to 20,000) a multi-stage design is required. The input

stage must provide high input impedance, low noise, low voltage drift and

excellent CMRR but should have no more gain than is required to assure that

the second stage will not affect these input parameters. In addition to the

-22-

Page 26: Y IMBLMS - NASA

input differential pair, a second differential stage should be used in order

to facilitate low frequency bandwidth limiting. Following a differential

to single-ended conversion all succeeding stages will be single-ended and

shall provide high frequency bandwidth limiting. The output dynamic range

can be achieved by taking the output signal from different single-ended

output amplifiers. See Figure IV-4-1. For a 25 mv signal the output would

be taken from output #1, other signals would have their outputs taken from

output #2.

5, Common Mode Rejection

In order to reduce the effects of electrical interference and hence keep

overall output noise at a minimum, a differential amplifier configuration

is used. The differential amplifier has the inherent characteristic that

it amplifies the difference in the signals presented to its inputs and not

the signals themselves (common mode signals); therefore, if noise or inter-

ference (60 Hz, etc.) appears at its inputs in phase, it will be rejected

by the amplifier and will not appear at its output. The ability of an

amplifier to perform in this fashion is determined by many factors, i.e.,

signal level, device non-linearity, device matching, input impedance, source

impedance, etc.

Common Mode Rejection Ratios (CMRR) of 100 db are readily attainable with

balanced sources and over a frequency range from DC to 100 Hz using matched

junction FETS. With the source impedance required by the GPA, a degradation

of approximately 20 db in CMRR can be expected with a source unbalance of as

much as 100K. Since source unbalance will be determined primarily by the

type of electrode used and its characteristics, a 100 db minimum CMRR is a

reasonable specification, with a design goal specification of 120 db.

-23-

Page 27: Y IMBLMS - NASA

out— tEH

a{O

>HH

wDO

A A - 24 -

Page 28: Y IMBLMS - NASA

Typically, the CMRR must fall somewhere between the limits.

6. Switching Techniques

In order to attain the flexibility required in order that the GPA be used

to make a myriad of physiological measurements, it is necessary to use

some sort of switching device or devices to implement gain and bandwidth

variations and to provide for lead switching. From the system point of

view, any switching device must be electrically operated so that completely

automatic operation is possible. Either electro-mechanical or solid-state

switching is feasible. The characteristics of an example of each is given

in Table IV-6-1. It is recommended that FET switches be used because of

size, power consumption and direct logic compatibility. The higher "on"

resistance of the FET switch is small compared to the impedances being

switched or being switched into. The advantages of FET switches are given

in Table IV-6-1.

Various circuit techniques can be used to modify the amplifier's gain and

bandwidth. Table 1V-6-2 lists some of these methods. Since the GPA is a

differential input amplifier with a single-ended output, it is necessary

to convert from a differential signal to a single-ended signal somewhere

in the circuit. Operational amplifiers are excellent for this purpose.

They also provide exceptionally stable gain blocks whose gain and frequency

response can be varied very predictably by varying external passive com-

ponents.

Lead switching can be accomplished by swtiching either the inputs to a single

amplifier or by switching to the output of one amplifier for each lead con-

figuration. It is obvious that output switching pays the. penalty of requiring

many amplifiers to perform a single measurement, but it does remove many of

the problems associated with electrical swtiching at low signal levels.

FET switches are presently being used to switch EGG leads and even though

no information has been uncovered where these switches have been used for

-25-

Page 29: Y IMBLMS - NASA

EEC, it is assumed that preamplifiers or buffers will be used, removing

any objection to input switching for this sensitive measurement.

7. Safety Devices (BGLS)

In order to be effective, a current-limiting type safety device such as the

BGLS must be placed in series with any source of lethal voltage and the

subject. The most obvious danger area is the ground lead used for making the

bio-potential measurements; however, all leads attached to the subject provide

a potential path for lethal currents. Placing these current-limiting devices

in series with the inputs to any amplifier used for bio-potential measurements

causes the following problems:

1) The source impedance is increased by the insertion impedance

of the device with consequent effect on gain accuracy and noise.

2) Any mismatch in insertion impedance from device to device looks

like source unbalance to the amplifier and results in degradation

of CMRR.

3) The increasing insertion impedance as a function of input voltage

will cause some degradation in gain linearity.

Problems 1 and 2 can be alleviated using buffers with the safety device in

series with the buffer input. Problem 3 can be ignored at the signal levels

in question (10 uv to 5 mv).

8. Buffering

The amplifier requirements discussed previously have been based on a direct

electrode/transducer interface and the interposition of other devices has

not been considered. By buffering we imply that the source of the signal

is isolated from the device making the measurement. Buffers may be single-

ended or differential. They may be simply impedance conversion devices

-26-

Page 30: Y IMBLMS - NASA

PiOHcoMCOWPi

gH

as

OMH

WPHO

W

M

OHH

WPHO

W&2

w

l-lQ

QW3C

Ouw

COwo

UPiHO

CJ oIVO

M

Wh4PQ

CJ

aM

aroib

I

IPi

-27-

Page 31: Y IMBLMS - NASA

£j>•^ r— 1

a •-"M QCO

^— ' f-H

5 SQ

H CJM M

CO MCO

HW OPn H

<;ijwp^

g

IT)

V

g»5

OCM

IV

wQ

PM

CJ

MH

WPMO

COw

COCA

Q

O *QM WCJ CO

W

<1 m

CJ <W CJCHC.1'

O

CQMH

Qj

§OCJ

CJH

Q

^

COu §co O

oo or-i r-l

M M

§o1— 1

dCO HS Si— i i— i

^ ^

W CJs i^tM <!H H

COCJ MZ COh~l MH CH

W KPL| O0 =

CO P4HM CO

04 CJM HCJ H

sQ co ^

H i-J CJ

«i ^ ***CJ W HW > •<H W f-3£5 f/J PT(

3^LO

1

8

NMCO

COwCJM

MQ

COoMHco

CJ

IvD

I

-28-

Page 32: Y IMBLMS - NASA

with no actual gain (i. e. , gain of one) or they may perform an impedance

conversion and also have gain. Regardless of their other characteristics,

they must provide a high input impedance and a low stable output impedance

in order to be useful as electrode buffers. Hence one certain effect of

using buffering is to reduce the required input impedance of the GPA to

hundreds of kilohms rather than hundreds of megohms. One other advan-

tage immediately derived from using a buffer is the ability to provide more

reliable input switching due to the low and constant nature of the switched

source.

A single-ended buffer possessing a gain of one will have no effect on the

GPA's gain, noise or CMRR requirements. If, however, the buffer has

gain, the gain and noise requirements of the GPA can be relaxed accordingly.

Differential buffers will affect all of the GPA's input requirements since

in effect they serve as input stages located close to the electrode site.

The differential buffer, however, must be committed to an electrode pair

or some means of switching must be provided similar to that required fort

input lead switching with no buffering. As a result there is really little

difference in the description or requirements of the two signal conditioning

systems: GPA vs. GPA with differential buffers.

It is anticipated that single-ended, gain of one, electrode buffers will be

used for more sensitive measurements such as EEG and with dry or insu-

lated electrodes. The use of these buffers allows to reduce the input

impedance of the GPA to the level of tens of megohms. This high an input

impedance will still be required to swamp out variations in output impedance

from buffer to buffer and, more importantly, to allow the GPA to be used

- 29 -

Page 33: Y IMBLMS - NASA

for bio-potential measurements with wet electrodes without buffers.

9. INPUT IMPEDANCE

The input impedance of the GPA must be high enough not to cause unaccept-

able loading effects nor serious degradation of CMRR in the presence of an

unbalanced source. The assumption will be made that the worst case

source impedance is presented by a wet electrode, i. e. , ^ 40, 000 ohms.

Hence, for a . 1% loading factor, the common mode input impedance must

be a minimum of 40 megohms. An input impedance of 40 megohms and an

unbalance impedance of 40 kilohms will cause a degradation of CMRR of

approximately 30 to 40 db.

V. AMPLIFIER SPECIFICATIONS

In an attempt to further define the GPA, a preliminary specification has

been prepared which contains the values for all the parameters of interest.

The specifications are as follows:

PRELIMINARY GPA SPECIFICATIONS

ALL SPECIFICATIONS ARE AT 25°C UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

1. GAIN (See Note 1)

Gain Accuracy (See Note 2)

2. INPUT IMPEDANCE

Common Mode

Differential

3. CMRR (DC)

(100 Hz)

MIN.

100

TYPICAL MAX UNITS

2x1 O4

1 (Ji

4X10'

106

100

80

10°

107

120

100

OHMS

OHMS

db

db

- 30 -

Page 34: Y IMBLMS - NASA

MIN. TYPICAL MAX UNITS

4. FREQUENCY RESPONSE(See Note 3)

High Frequency (3 db down) 1000

Low Frequency (3 db down)

5. NOISE

. 5 to 1000 Hz

6. INPUT DYNAMIC RANGE(See Note 4)

7. INPUT CURRENT

Either Input

Differential

Doubles every 10°C

8. INPUT VOLTAGE

Vs. Temperature

Vs. Time

5

70

.1

.01

5

10

1200 Hz

DC Hz

10 jiv p-p

db

1 na

. 1 na

10 /4volts/o.-\^

100 /A volts/HR

NOTE 1 — The gain must be capable of being electronically switched from

100 to 20, 000 in the following steps:

100200400500

1000200040005000

1000020000

NOTE 2 — Gain accuracy is to be maintained with a source impedance of

40, 000 ohms.

_ 31 .

Page 35: Y IMBLMS - NASA

NOTE 3 — The overall desired bandwidth is DC to 1000 Hz. The following

minimum number of upper and lower frequency limits should be provided

via electronic switching:

Upper Limit (3 db) Lower Limit (3 db)

100 Hz DC Hz500 Hz .14 Hz

1000 Hz .5 Hz

Upper and lower roll-off rates must be a minimum of 10 db/octave.

NOTE 4 — 1 0 ;iv to 25 mv.

VI. DEDICATED VS. GPA TRADE STUDIES

For the purpose of performing trade studies to determine whether a general

purpose amplifier approach or a dedicated amplifier approach is best for

use in IMBLMS, it is necessary to define a physiological measurements

baseline. The baseline measures have been adapted from the IMBLMS

Phase C Preliminary Statement of Work dated 5/5/71. The baseline

measurements are as follows:

1. EEC 8 Channels

2. EMG 2 Channels

3. EOG 4 Channels

4. VCG 3 Channels

5. EGG 6 Channels

Therefore, there are 5 dedicated amplifier designs to be considered. We

will assume that 1 GPA will replace 1 dedicated amplifier, although in actual

usage fewer GPA's will probably be required depending upon the manner in

which the actual measurements are performed. The trade-off to be con-

sidered therefore is between 5 different dedicated amplifier designs in

- 32 -

Page 36: Y IMBLMS - NASA

varying numbers and 23 GPAs.

1. Complexity

From a design point of view, the GPA must be at least as complex as

the most sophisticated dedicated amplifier it is to replace but, in addition,

it must also provide for switching of frequency and gain. The increased

complexity can be represented fairly well as the addition of approximately

12 resistors, 12 capacitors and 4 flatpacks containing 4 FET switches each.

Table VI-1-1 lists the major differences between the amplifiers under con-

sideration. This Table will allow us to assign a rough complexity factor to

the designs. Normalizing EOG as 1. 0 since it would be the simplest design,

we can assign numbers to the other designs as listed in Table VI-1-2.

EOG

EEC

EMG

ECG

VCG

GPA

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

0

2

3

3

3

5

TABLE VI-1-2 COMPLEXITY FACTORS

Due to similarities in the design of the various amplifier, there would be

a learning curve associated with the actual cost of designing the five

dedicated amplifiers. See the trade study on cost included in this report.

- 33 -

Page 37: Y IMBLMS - NASA

HD

i— <

8i

0 tsjO hr<0 *^ 0f O

n2

z°£**< «O ~

1 CO*rn

?«R! PHOp°2^ 3**?< IJ QHH (-1

S HJH CtfCO HH

(— *

§§23^ ^ii^ sHH t-j -

fa &

SP

EC

!S

WIT

C

HCOi— i0z£oJ

11

oooo(\jfaO•jT£•

1— 1sEHDPQ

ooWCO<WS<CO

Nffi0

oI-M

0H

m•

faoCOCO

2PZ<PQHEDPQ

OWWCO<

SA

ME

ND

PA

SS

icP*rf^<H

oZaHi— i£CO

EHEDPHZHH

L_| ..,

^f f iW oU §x SH o

^o ^W HCO J^ sw <S Oj< ^co U

*WCtJ0

HU£

HDOH

!__(

dOfa

cuwuXwo"owCO<ws •5

INP

UT

E S

WIT

CH

ING

N Sffi >§so Pu

0 wH D

u 2N*'

Q Pco ZCO <<ft oZ ^< > .PQ P wH ^ S£ < p 1W O PU U ZX W <W ^ CQ,.- O PO fa Zw ™ <u

bi ZCO Qi HH

< 0 ^W ^ °S H oi< W Oco Z fa

COW

CO

05Wfa

>HJCQ

OO

oww

o2u

ouw

ou o

- 34 .

Page 38: Y IMBLMS - NASA

2. RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND FLEXIBILITY

It is extremely difficult, in the absence of a specific design, to assess

the influence of a GPA versus dedicated amplifier approach on either re-

liability or maintainability. However, some general comments can be

made.

f *

First, due to the increased complexity of the GPA design, it is anticipated

that the reliability of the GPA as a component must be less than any single

dedicated amplifier.

Secondly, if reliability also contains a factor depending on ultimate mission

success (i. e. , completion of desired experiments), then the absolute inter-

changeability of the individual GPAs must increase this factor.

Thirdly, maintainability on a component repair basis must be decreased

in the GPA approach due to sheer increase in parts counts and circuit

complexity.

Fourth, system maintainability in terms of getting the system back up after

an amplifier failure should be unaffected regardless of which amplifier

approach is used. In the case, however, of a limiting spares situation,

interchangeability will provide a quicker turn-around time than component

repair.

Since ach GPA channel is to be capable of performing EGG, VCG, etc. ,

although certain channels, based on experiment design, will be ear-marked

for particular measurements, it will be possible to increase the number of

channels of any particular measurement at will, up to the number of GPAs

in the system. Thus, in our hypothetical system, there could be up to 23

- 35 -

Page 39: Y IMBLMS - NASA

channels of EMG available should a deviation in experiment results deem

them necessary. This means greater measurement flexibility in the

overall system flexibility. Table VI-2-1 summarizes the above.

COMPONENT RELIABILITY

MISSION SUCCESS

COMPONENT MAINTAINABILITY

SYSTEM MAINTAINABILITY

FLEXIBILITY

GPA

+•

—+

+-

DEDICATED

-f-

-f-

TABLE VI-2-1

- 36 -

Page 40: Y IMBLMS - NASA

3. COST

In order to prepare an effective cost trade-off for the GPA, it is necessary

to delineate between recurring and non-recurring costs. For the purposes

of this trade, non-recurring costs are as follows:

a. Engineering Design

b. Planning

c. Tooling/Set-Up

d. Training

e. Qualification

f. Material/Vendor NRE

Recurring costs are as follows:

a. Manufacturing

b. Quality Control

c. Engineering Follow-Up

d. Material

Table VI-3-1 gives a matrix of non-recurring costs for 10 similar designs.

Based on an estimated $10, 000 engineering effort for the first design. The

engineering effort for succeeding designs decreases based on the similarity

of the designs.

Table VI-3-2 gives a cross tabulation of recurring charges for a single

design versus the number of units built.

Table VI-3-3 gives a cross tabulation of recurring charges for 5 designs

versus total number of units built.

- 37 -

Page 41: Y IMBLMS - NASA

In all cases, the engineering costs for a single design have been normalized

at $10, 000.

We can now arrive at a relative cost factor for each approach. For the

dedicated amplifier approach, we have 23 units of 5 different designs.

Looking at Table VT-3-1, we have a non-recurring cost of $65, 908 and from

Table VI-3-3, we have a recurring cost of $44, 302, for a total of $110, 310.

In the case of the GPA, we have a non-recurring cost of $23, 580 and a

recurring cost of $30,900 (Table VI-3-2), for a total cost of $54,480.

Hence, the cost ratio between the two approaches is 2:1.

- 38 -

Page 42: Y IMBLMS - NASA

i

O

WHH

W

&£JD

i<;

UN

CLE

uj

Oz2ajDUHtfi

1i

a,

AB

ULA

H

ahH

WQ

wQjt>U

o

o

00

[N-

NO

in

<*

CO

rvj

t£in00

NO

i-H

eO

egeg(M

egeg

r-CO(M

NO

pg

00ipteg

r-eg

r-ON

eg

NO

COCO

O00

^

o

m^

mi-Hi-H

i-Hegi-H

eg,-H

mCOi-H

m"Nf

i-H

00mi-H

NO

i-H

egoeg

omeg

ooin

0

mr-

00COi-H

m^fi-H

mi-H

egNO

i-H

-Nf

r-i-H

O

i-H

i-Hi-Heg

egeg

o0CO

OoNO

0o00

000egCO

OO^*CO

0

mCO

0i-Hr-CO

or-tONCO

O00i-HTf

OCOin^F

oom

oo0NO

0ooo""

0

O00

NO

mNO

o00NO

COor-

egT}<r-

eooor--

CO00

0

egi-HOi-H

O0egi-H

OOoeg

0

m^

o0COeg

o^feg

0

meg

0of^.eg

ooONeg

o,_!

CO

0i-HmCO

oaTf

ooom

ooooi-H

mo[N.

NO

00

Q~N

NO

£

egt .

NO

00NOf^.

[X.

mI-Hoo

egoofN_

00

oO"

COm00oi-H

NO

000COi-H

oCOinCOeg

OCOr-egor— imegoc£

oQN00

i-Hmt--i— i00

mNO

O

00om

eg.— ir-m

0^i-Hmr-

NO

NO

NO

NO

CO

0

COinCOeg

OHH

i CO1 WZ Q

W DJ Uk H

»2 2

«

w

en

i—iiCO

iwCP

EH

O

CLDHW

O

< oj o(L H

pH<

OP

W>

^-^ . . ^1£* r* i—iIt, ~JHH Q

D <a 2

Oz

wwHHow

OH

W>HHH<•JD

DU

. 39 -

Page 43: Y IMBLMS - NASA

o*—IwwQ

HwOuHsD

g

DUW

M

fOI

i—i

w

oCOi"

COCO•<c

00CO•f

rg•o"•<c

MOTf

•*

rgin•<C

r-in•«C

COMO•<c

ONMO1C

MOr-*rg00iC

oON•<c

ooON•*

COoin

r-*-4in

O>Nin

-4rfin

MOinin

rgr-in

rgONin

MO-4MO

MO

•*MO

inCOMO

rgiCr-

o•*co

oorg•-4

m1-4

rg

MO

rg

ONrg

<— 4rgrg

COrgrg

MOrgrg

00rgrg

rgCO 'CM

iCCOrg

ooCOrg

,_«ifrg

miCrg

ONiCrg

•*mrg

COmrg

•*MOrg

or-rg

00r-rg

NO00rg

MOONrg

CO0CO

COCMCO

rgiCCO

MOr-CO

oCMiC

ooMO

oorg

oorg

oorg

oorg

oorg

Oorg

OOrg

ooCM

OOrg

oorg

ooCM

ooCM

ooCM

ooCM

OOrg

oorg

ooCM

oOrg

Oorg

oorg

oorg

oorg

oorg

o0rg

oorg

oorg

Oinrg

oinrg

oinrg

oinrg

oinrg

omCM

or-rg

op-rg

op-rg

oorg

or-rg

or>rg

or-rg

or-CM

or-rg

or-rg

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

o0CO

ooCO

0oCO

ooCO

0oCO

ooCO

' ' incro

er»ON

O

«-*

f>

o«CO^H

••H

•-H_. . .

•-4

—ooCMI-Hp*-4

inmft

inMOi-H

—4

CO

P-

•—4

^H

•*CO1-4l-H

COONi— 1

—4

inoCMf-4

r--4rg-i

CMCOrg•— 4

in•*rg

.NO

rg(-4

^1CO

—4

rfCOco—4

~oomCO

•—4

~fM«-4

•xfv— 4

ON1-4•<*••-4

ONNO

•*^4

r-rgm^4

ooi-4

NO

ONO

r—(-4

: OoCOrg

orgS™NO

O

3CO

r-ooWooONQCO

r-COIN-

R?cd~NO

NO

corg<5"1CinCMin00COsOCMo'CMCMJOrgr-•#o

iNO

**ooCMrgbr-NO

amNO

•*0CMCO•vt"CMON1-4

NOI— 4

OCO

i-H

r-t-vO1—4

comin*-Hr-ON.i— 1

•*•-4

CONO

COIM1—4

inoin(-4-4COO"

0

s•*r—NO00

inoCMr-oor-NOm

Q

MOOU1

ooCOCM

ObS

U

dou

HOH U

- 40 -

Page 44: Y IMBLMS - NASA

§owwQ

HwOU

DO2sa!DUWa!

CO

CO

£w

xOPJ

inPJ

•<tPJ

COPJ

PJPJ

PJ

0PJ

Ox

— '

COI— 1

r-r-H

xD••H

m

•<t»-H

CO1

CM

l-H

Ol-H

O^

00

r-

o

tn

v

rO

(V)

xtp-oo

p-r~oo

oCO00

PJCO00

xt00CO

000000

PJOx00

inOxoo

Ox0-00

PJ0OX

r-0Ox

-Ox

xOi-HOx

••HPJOx

xOPJOx

X*COOX

oxtOx

COxtOx

xOinOx

p-xOOx

Oxr-o-

xtOxOx

CO,—1

oi-H

00COoI-H

oooof-H

ooPJt-t

r-COxt

coCOxt

oxtxt

^xtxt

PJxtxt

•xfxtxt

xDxtxt

r-xtxt

Ox

xt

xt

omxt

COinxt

minxt

COinxt

oxOxt

COxOxt

p-xOxt

or-xt

xtr-xt

oor-xt

PJcox*

Oxooxt

t-Oxxt

xOom

o«i-Hm

oxtin

ooxO

ooPJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

o0PJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

ooPJ

00PJ

00PJ

ooPJ

ooPJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

ooPJ

0QPJ

Q

oPJ

ooPJ

o0PJ

ooPJ

ooPJ

0oCO

ooCO

0oCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

ooCO

•-H

00^H

rH

00

*— I

orJ00

f-H

COPJ00

xOPJCO

PJCOoo

ooCOCO

PJxtCOl-H

OOxtco

PJIfl00i-H

oxOool-H

xO-0CO,-H

xtp-col-H

^00COl-H

O"

COool-l

1-4oOX

*— *

o1-4O*

PJPJOxl-H

•*COOx^Hj

5?Ox^4

00xOO-1-4

1— 1o-Ox•-4

o-1— toPJ

t-moPJ

oPJ^H

PJooCOPJ

xtxtf-ccxTCOCO0-CsM4

PJPJ

2•TPJoCOxtxt

&•t—Tf

(M*xf

COmxOQ*r«— tPJ00CQCO

COCOOx

tfi-H

xt

(-H

IDCO

CO

o-PJCOCO

xtxtQHCO

00mOx

KjmI— 4r-PJrtxtootQoxOOx

ai-Hr-oMC^

or-l-H

8

OxOPJ00

ooCOCOxD1—4

•xt

oxtxt

min•xfPJ

r-ooxtoH

xOO-xtCO

p-r~xtxO

Q

PJXH4

•xf

o ud

ozu

HOH

DU

-' 41 -

Page 45: Y IMBLMS - NASA

VII. RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations of this study are as follows:

(1) For intended flight applications a single amplifier design with a

single qualification program and redundancy in manufacturing and

operability is the most effective approach to be taken.

(2) The amplifier must be designed to have a differential input with

a sufficiently high input impedance to allow it to be used with chosen

transducers and conventional wet electrodes.

(3) The amplifier must have sufficient input switching to allow for the

various lead combinations required for a clinical EGG.

(4) Gain and frequency adjustment will be switched and will provide for

a minimum of 5 selectable gains for each measurement.

(5) Switching will be accomplished using integrated circuit J-FET

switches compatible with TTL logic.

(6) Buffers should be used to pre-process the signals received by the

amplifier. These buffers will be either located at the electrode site

or as close thereto as conveniently possible. For a dedicated ampli-

fier system buffers would also provide optimum performance. The

GPA will have the capability of operating without buffers with degraded

performance in noise and CMRR.

- 42 -

Page 46: Y IMBLMS - NASA

o

G E N E R A L E L E C T R I C

*Znart* /")ii//cir»n / Headquarters: Valley Forge, Pennsylvania D Daytona Beach, Fla. Q Cape Kennedy, Fla.o^aoc LJIVI&IUII I rj Evendale.OhioD Huntsville, Ala. Q Bay St. Louis, Miss. Q Houston, Texas D Newport Beach, Calif.

O