1 george mason school of law contracts i e.offers f.h. buckley [email protected]

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts I

E. Offers

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Hume on Beneficial Reliance

Your corn is ripe to-day; mine will be so tomorrow. `Tis profitable for us both, that I shou'd labour with you to-day, and that you shou'd aid me to-morrow. I have no kindness for you, and know you have as little for me. I will not, therefore, take any pains upon your account; and shou'd I labour with you upon my own account, in expectation of a return, I know I shou'd be disappointed, and that I shou'd in vain depend upon your gratitude. Here then I leave you to labour alone: You treat me in the same manner. The seasons change; and both of us lose our harvests for want of mutual confidence and security.

3

The Five W’s

Who What Where When Why

5

Basic Questions of Formation

Who are the parties What happens to non-parties?

What Where When Why

6


Who are the parties What did they agree to?

What are the terms and conditions

Where When Why

7


Who are the parties What did they agree to? Where was the contract formed?

Under which law

When Why

8


Who are the parties What did they agree to? Where was the contract formed? When was it formed?

Pre-contractual rights Limitation periods

Why

9


Who are the parties What did they agree to? Where was the contract formed? When was it formed? Why did they enter into the contract

The doctrine of consideration

10

Who are the parties? Restatement § 2 (1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to

act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.

(2) The person manifesting the intention is the promisor.

(3) The person to whom the manifestation is addressed is the promisee.

(4) Where performance will benefit a person other than the promisee, that person is a beneficiary.

11

Who are the parties? Restatement § 2 (4) Where performance will benefit a person

other than the promisee, that person is a beneficiary. The old rule of privity of contract

12

What counts as a contract?

13

The need for a “meeting of the minds” Quinn J. in Williams v. Walker-Thomas at

53

Non-promises

2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. What does this exclude?

14

Non-promises

(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. “I expect to see you at lunch tomorrow”

15

Non-promises

(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. “I may sell my car to you”

16

Secret reservations

How about: “I will sell you my car tomorrow” (while privately resolving not to do so)

17

The Objective Standard

Restatement § 2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. A remedy for “false promising”

18

Lucy v. Zehmer at p. 14

19

Lucy v. Zehmer at p. 13

20

Lucy v. Zehmer

21

Back on State 40 about a half mile from the junction with County 613 the traveler comes upon the FERGUSON PLACE; … The two sections are connected by a passageway—commonly called a colonnade, though quite innocent of columns. The wide-boarded floors, flat-head nails, massive locks, H and L hinges, and hand-carved mantels attest the antiquity of a house well worth the restoration it has not received.

And here it is!

22

Why does the drinking matter?

23


24

Capacity: Restatement § 16 (1) A person incurs only voidable

contractual duties by entering into a transaction if the other party has reason to know that by reason of intoxication (a) he is unable to understand in a reasonable manner the nature and consequences of the transaction, or (b) he is unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction


25




26




Restatement § 2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.

27


28




29




Restatement § 2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.

30

Lucy v. Zehmer

31

What is the role of intention to create legal relations? Restatement § 21: Neither real nor apparent

intention that a promise be legally binding is essential to the formation of a contract, but a manifestation of intention that a promise shall not affect legal relations may prevent the formation of a contract.

What if Zehmer didn’t really intend to sell?

Lucy v. Zehmer

32

What if Zehmer didn’t really intend to sell? An Objective standard

Lucy v. Zehmer

33

Suppose Lucy knew that Zehmer acted in jest?

Restatement §20. EFFECT OF MISUNDERSTANDING (1) There is no manifestation of mutual assent to an

exchange if the parties attach materially different meanings to their manifestations and

(a) neither party knows or has reason to know the meaning attached by the other; or

(b) each party knows or each party has reason to know the meaning attached by the other.

Lucy v. Zehmer

34

What remedy is sought and why did that matter? Recall Mansfield in Moses v. Macferlan

Lucy v. Zehmer

35

Even if a contract was made on the Saturday, why couldn’t Zehmer retract on the Sunday?

Lucy v. Zehmer

36

Even if a contract was made on the Saturday, why couldn’t Zehmer retract on the Sunday?

Has there been either any beneficial or detrimental reliance at that point?

Leonard v. Pepsico at 18

37


38

Was this really an offer to sell a jet for $700,000?


39

“No objective person could reasonably have concluded that the commercial actually offered consumers a Harrier Jet.”


40

Bargains: Rest. § 3

A bargain is an agreement to exchange promises or to exchange a promise for a performance or to exchange performances.

41

Bargains: Rest. § 3 A bargain is an agreement to exchange

promises or to exchange a promise for a performance or to exchange performances. Wholly executory contracts: promise for

promise Wholly executed contracts: performance

for performance

42

A wholly executed contract:Gleinicke Bridge, Berlin, 1986

43

Formation as a Coordination Game

44

You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time.


45

You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. What day?


46

You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. What city?


47

You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. Where in NYC?


48

You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. What time?

What side of the road to drive on?Coordination Games

49

Right Left

Right Happy, Happy Death, Death

Left Death, Death Joy, Joy

Player 1

Player 2

Formation as a coordination game

50

Promise No Promise

Promise 10, 10 -10, 0

No Promise 0, -10 0, 0

Player 1

Player 2

Formation as a coordination gameAssume both parties want to agree

51

Thinks there’s a Promise

Doesn’t think a Promise


10, 10 -10, 0


0, -10 0, 0

Player 1

Player 2

The interesting case: where the parties disagree about the agreement

52




10, 10 -10, 0


0, -10 10, 10

Player 1

Player 2

Solving the coordination problem

53

Do the rules of offer and acceptance provide the parties with suitable focal points?

Bargaining errors as an avoidable accident

54

What we got here is a failure to communicate

Two kinds of Promissory Accidents

55

Type I: We believe in a falsehood

Type II: We don’t believe in that which is true


56

Type I: We believe in a falsehood We think we have a contract, only we don’tA false positive: Leonard v. Pepsico


57

Type II: We don’t believe in that which is true

We don’t think we have a contract, but in reality we do:

A true negative: Lucy v. Zehmer

How to reduce promissory accidents? Offer and Acceptance

58

Restatement § 22(1). The manifestation of mutual assent to an exchange ordinarily takes the form of an offer or proposal by one party followed by an acceptance by the other party or parties.

Offers

59

Restatement § 24. An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.

Acceptance

60

Restatement § 50. Acceptance of an offer is the manifestation of assent to the terms thereof…

How to reduce promissory accidents?

61

What if we could identify the party who could at least cost eliminate the accident?


62

What if we could identify the party who could at least cost eliminate the accident? Who was this in Bailey?


63

What if we could identify the party who could at least cost eliminate the accident? And in Zehmer?

The source of promissory accidents

64

1. What counts as an offer?


65

1. What counts as an offer?2. What counts as an acceptance?


66

1. What counts as an offer?2. What counts as an acceptance?3. How long do offers and acceptances

stand (i.e., what about retraction?)

What counts as an offer?

67

Offers vs. “Invitations to treat”

Offers vs. “mere puffs”

Offers to the world: unilateral contracts

Offers to the PublicCourteen Seed v. Abraham 207

68

What did the flyer say? Could that have been accepted as an

offer?


69

What did the flyer say? Plaintiff’s wire on Oct. 8

Could that have been accepted as an offer?


70

What did the flyer say? Plaintiff’s wire on Oct. 8 Defendant’s response (I am asking 23

cents a pound) Could that have been accepted as an

offer?


71

Offer v. Invitation to treat Why does the distinction make sense?

Offers to the PublicFairmont v. Cruden-Martin 210

72

Can you distinguish this case?

Offers to the Public

73

Can you distinguish this case? “for immediate acceptance”?

Offers to the Public

74

Can you distinguish this case? “for immediate acceptance”? Was anything left out?

Offers to the PublicAudio Visual v. Sharp at 212

75

Why might a presumptive rule that ads or flyers are not offers make sense?

Offers to the PublicAudio Visual v. Sharp at 212

76

Why might a presumptive rule that ads or flyers are not offers make sense?

Cf. Newspaper Ad on 213

Lefkowitz 213

77

Offer or Invitation to Treat?

Lefkowitz

78

Could the offeror revoke his offer?

Lefkowitz

79

Could the offeror revoke his offer? Restatement 36(1) An offeree’s power of

acceptance may be terminated by:(c) revocation by the offeror

Lefkowitz

80

Did the offeror revoke in time? Could the offeror revoke through a private

“house rule”?

Lefkowitz

81

Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Could it be accepted in that way?

Lefkowitz

82

Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Could it be accepted in that way?

Buyers could only accept by showing up with the $1.

Lefkowitz

83

Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Corbin at 206: unilateral vs bilateral

contracts—what is the difference?

Lefkowitz

84

Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Unilateral Contracts: Where the offeree

can accept only by performance Bilateral Contracts: The offeree accepts

by return promise

Lefkowitz

85

Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”?

Was Lefkowitz obliged to buy the coat?

Lefkowitz

86

Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”?

How is this different from the Christy example on p. 213?

Lefkowitz

87

Is the distinction that the store insisted on the offeree showing up at the store?

And why did that matter to the store?

Why is it so hard to get from one store to another at Pentagon Mall?

88 Pentagon City Mall

Offers to the PublicCarlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball

89

From whom did the Π buy the smoke-ball?

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball at 224

90

Should this have been seen as anInvitation to Treat?

How do you tell?


91

What’s a “mere puff”

Mere puffs: Simple commendations do not oblige one

92

“simplex commendatio non obligat”


93

What’s does vagueness have to do with it?

And how did the court deal with the vagueness of the term?

Offers to the PublicCarlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball

94

How did the Π accept the offer?

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball

95

Does the offeree have to communicate acceptance in a unilateral contract?

And did Carbolic have reason to waive notice?


96

Can you think of a reason why the Δ might WANT to assume liability?

Self-service stores

Barker v. Allied at 215 How would you analyze this?

97

Cole v. Sandel at 215

What did the online form amount to? What is an “agreement to agree”

98

The Law of Offers serves coordination and efficiency goals

Must seem objectively like real offers Secret reservations Invitations to treat Certainty of terms Cannot be mere puffs

99

1 george mason school of law contracts i e.offers f.h. buckley [email protected]

Documents

manifestation of intention

specified way

shoud labour

car tomorrow

beneficial relianceyour

old rule of privity

mutual confidence

doctrine of consideration