1 george mason school of law contracts ii reliance/restitution/punitives f.h. buckley...

65
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley [email protected]

Upload: jayden-arnold

Post on 26-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Reliance/Restitution/Punitives

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Next (last) day

Finish Remedies chapter Scott 1001-36

2

Page 3: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

If damages are meant to compensate the innocent party for the wrong done him, what is the wrong when the other party breaches? Failure to perform: Expectation damages Inviting detrimental reliance: reliance

damages

3

Page 4: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When would the Π prefer reliance damages?

4

Page 5: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When would the Π prefer reliance damages? Whenever these exceed the expectation

award

5

Page 6: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When would the Π prefer reliance damages? Whenever these exceed the expectation

award Limits on expectation damages

Uncertainty Foreseeability Or bad bargains?

6

Page 7: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When would the Π prefer reliance damages? Whenever these exceed the expectation

award Should the Π have the option in such cases?

7

Page 8: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Freund

What are the three kinds of damages that are considered? The Expectation Interest The Reliance Interest

Semble not to exceed the expectation interest, or else a windfall

8

Page 9: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages?

9

Page 10: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? Contracts with Physicians

Hawkins v. McGee 892

10

Page 11: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? Contracts with Physicians

Hawkins v. McGee

11

Page 12: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? Contracts with Physicians

Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor?

12

Page 13: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? Contracts with Physicians

Hawkins v. McGee Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor?

What would the two measures give? What difference in pain and suffering claims?

13

Page 14: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

When should the Π be limited to reliance damages? Contracts with Physicians

Hawkins v. McGee Why a different result in Sullivan v. O’Connor?

What would the two measures give? What would restitution give?

14

Page 15: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster 896

15

Robert Stack as Eliot Ness

Page 16: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster The FBI attracted college graduate to work

as clerical staff because of the possibility of receiving preferential consideration as special agents

The FBI stopped the program in 1977 because (1) they weren’t getting qualified people, and (2) the FBI wanted to institute an affirmative action program.

16

Page 17: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument?

17

Page 18: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? Reversed on appeal

18

Page 19: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

19

Page 20: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

What are the problems with expectation damages?

20

Page 21: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

What are the problems with expectation damages? Uncertainty FBI’s right to terminate

21

Page 22: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages?

22

Page 23: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages? Yes—but no proof that a bad bargain.

23

Page 24: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The measure of damages

Kizas v. Webster So what do you think of the takings

argument? If it would succeed, what kind of damages?

Do expectation damages place a ceiling on reliance damages? So what they get is the difference between

what they received as FBI employees (and for a year afterwards) and what they would have received in the labor market, plus dislocation

24

Page 25: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Anglia v. Reed 902

25

Robert Reed, The Brady Bunch

Page 26: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Anglia v. Reed

What was the problem with expectation damages?

26

Page 27: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Anglia v. Reed

What was the problem with expectation damages?

If expectation damages are speculative, could any reliance damages be awarded?

27

Page 28: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Anglia v. Reed

What was the problem with expectation damages?

If expectation damages are speculative, could any reliance damages be awarded? Both pre- and post-contract reliance

damages awarded

28

Page 29: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution

The forms of action: Trespass Action on the case

Negligence Assumpsit Quasi Contract

Money had and received

29

Page 30: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution or Unjust Enrichment

A general principle of restitution out of Quasi Contract, Money had and received, breach of fiduciary duty

Based on Δ’s unjust retention of a benefit as against Π, and not on Π’s reliance losses.

30

Page 31: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution: General Principles

Suppose that, without asking you permission, I put orange aluminum siding on your house. Can I recover the cost of doing do from you?

31

Page 32: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution

Bailey v. West p. 5 What should the Πs have done with the

horse?

32

Page 33: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution

Bailey v. West p. 5 What should the Πs have done with the

horse? Restitutionary remedies are available in

spite of or in the absence of consent—but not if the Π is an officious intermeddler

33

Page 34: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution

Bailey v. West p. 5 What should the Πs have done with the

horse? Restitutionary remedies are available in

spite or the absence of consent—but not if the Π is an officious intermeddler If not, see Leebow at p. 911

34

Page 35: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restitution

Bailey v. West p. 5 What should the Πs have done with the

horse? Restitutionary remedies are available in

spite or the absence of consent—but not if the Π is an officious intermeddler

But that problem doesn’t arise when restitution is sought as a remedy in contract

35

Page 36: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting 903

36Tri-cities Airport, Endicott NY

Page 37: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

37

Zara contracts with US gov’t to build an airport

Zara subcontracts the entire job to Π Two months after Π begins work, Zara

wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself.

Page 38: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

38

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. What can Π recover?

Value of work done at contract rate?

Page 39: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

39

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. What can Π recover?

Value of work done at contract rate? Quantum meruit for value of work done

(more than contract rate as the work was harder than expected)?

Page 40: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

40

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. What can Π recover?

What was the benefit unjustly retained by Zara? Is it unjust if the plaintiff is simply paid at the

contract rate?

Page 41: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

41

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. What can Π recover?

Does it matter that the defendant was in breach? Cf Restatement 373 Palmer Construction 909

Page 42: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

42

Two months after Π begins work, Zara wrongfully fires it and finishes the job itself. What can Π recover?

Does it matter that the defendant was in breach? Cf gloss added by Farash at 910

Page 43: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

43

The measure of recovery: Extent to which defendant’s wealth is

increased? Amount defendant would have paid a

third party for the work? Zara’s recovery from the government of

$17,115 for the extra work?

Page 44: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Zara Contracting

44

The court thought that Restatement 347, comment c was triggered. Was it?

Page 45: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Briton v. Turner 906

45

Is there some reason why the no-breach rule should be waived here?

Page 46: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner Aliter a temptation to strategic behavior

by the employer?

46

Page 47: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Can restitution damages exceed expectation damages?

Britton v. Turner Can the employer bargain around this?

47

Page 48: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

The American rule of costs chills meritorious actions (and encourages frivolous ones) Small dollar claims might not be brought

48

Page 49: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

The American rule of costs chills meritorious actions (and encourages frivolous ones)

But class actions remedy this And then some?

49

Page 50: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

If they do, an argument for punitive damages?

50

Page 51: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

If they do, an argument for punitive damages?

Of course, this assumes that the U.S. has it right and the rest of the world is really very backward…

51

Page 52: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

Would compensatory damages undercompensate in Hibschman Pontiac?

52

Page 53: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

53

Little GTO, you're really lookin' fineThree deuces and a four-speed and a 389Listen to her tachin' up now, listen to her whineC'mon and turn it on, wind it up, blow it out GTO

Wa-wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, (mixed with "Yeah, yeah, little

GTO")

Wa-wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, (mixed with "Yeah, yeah, little

GTO")

Wa-wa wa, wa, wa, wa, wa, wa (mixed with "Ahhh, little GTO")

Page 54: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damagesundercompensate?

What was the “malice, fraud, gross negligence and oppressive conduct”? As opposed to a simple breach of

contract…

54

Page 55: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

What was the “malice, fraud, gross negligence and oppressive conduct”? As opposed to a simple breach of

contract… Did the Π independently establish a

common law tort?

55

Page 56: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages undercompensate?

The jury awarded punitive damages assessed at 10 times the compensatory damages When is the “first blush” rule triggered?

5 times is appropriate?

56

Page 57: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

BMW v. Gore

$4,000 in compensatory damages for selling a used car without disclosing it had been repainted

$4,000,000 in punitives, later reduced to $2,000,000 by the Alabama Supreme Court

After USSC weighs in, punitives reduced to $50,000

57

Page 58: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages overdeter?

Suppose you’re a potential Δ. Are you made whole by a finding of no liability?

58

Page 59: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do damages overdeter?

Suppose you’re a potential Δ. Are you made whole by a finding of no liability?

59

Page 60: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Miller Brewing

What was the wrongful behavior? And what were the damages?

60

Page 61: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Miller Brewing

Best Beers a distributor for Miller for 30 years

Was the termination wrongful? Was Miller animated by something other

than its business interests?

61

Page 62: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Miller Brewing

The court found that Monroe Beverges performance was in some ways inferior to Best Beers.

Is this relevant?

62

Page 63: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Miller Brewing

Is Hibschman Pontiac overturned? The need for an independent common

law tort.

63

Page 64: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Pinto Case 922

Ford did not make a safety improvement which would have solved the problem because it did not think this cost effective, given the expected value of the accident In doing so, it valued a life as worth $2M Does this deserve punitive damages?

64

Page 65: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Reliance/Restitution/Punitives F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Backlash

Kozinski in Oki America at 992 Thyssen v. Taiwan Int’l at 923 State Farm and interstate exploitation

at 925 Cooter on business judgment

standards

65