1 location management in wireless mobile network by:ali bohlooli instructor: dr nasser movahhedi nia...

1

Location management in wireless mobile network

By:Ali Bohlooli

Instructor: Dr Nasser Movahhedi nia

Research Week 2007

2

Outline

• Introduction to Wireless Mobile Network

• Location Management Definition

• Location Management Solutions

3

Introduction

4

Introduction

5

Introduction

• key components– Mobile terminal (MT)– Base station (BS)– Mobile switching center (MS

C)– Home location register (HLR)– Visitor location register (VL

R)

6

Introduction

7

Introduction• Mobility Management

– location management – handoff management

• What is location management doing?

– location registration (or location update)

– paging

8

Introduction• Two standards for location management :

– 1. Interim Standard 41 (IS-41) (North America)– 2. Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM )

Mobile Application Part (MAP) (Europe, Asia)

• Both standards are two-level database hierarchy

9

Introduction

• Update and paging trade off

• Location Area and paging Area

10

Updating

11

Time Based Updating

12

Movement Based Updating

• movement threshold of 3 is used

13

Distance Based Updating

14

Calling Procedure• Call delivery

1.Determining the serving VLR of the called MT

2.Locating the visiting cell of the called MT (Paging)

• Determining the serving VLR of the called MT procedure 1.The calling MT sends a call initiation signal to

the serving MSC of the MT through a nearby base station.

15

Introduction2. The MSC determines the address of the HLR of the

called MT by Global Title Translation and sends a location request message to the HLR.

3. The HLR determines the serving VLR of the called MT and sends a route request message to the VLR. This VLR then forwards the message to the MSC serving the MT.

4. The MSC allocates a temporary identifier called temporary local directory number (TLDN) to the MT and sends a reply to the HLR together with the TLDN.

5. The HLR forwards this information to the MSC of the calling MT.

16

Calling Procedure• Locating the visiting cell of the called MT

(Paging) 1.Polling signals are broadcast to all cells within

the residing LA of the called MT.

2.On receiving the polling signal, the MT sends a reply which allows the MSC to determine its current residing cell.

18

Location Management for Cellular Networks

1. Pointer Forwarding:

K = 2 K = 2

19

Location Management for Cellular Networks

2. Local Anchoring:

20

Location Management for Cellular Networks(Cont.)

3. Pre-User Location Caching:

21


5. User Profile Replication: – An MT's location is replicated at selected local databases

to facilitate call delivery. – When a call for the MT originates from the service area

of any replicated database, the call can be routed without querying the HLR, thus reducing the call delivery delay.

– However, each time the MT changes its location all replicated databases need to be updated with the new location, triggering a high location update cost, especially for highly mobile users.

– It favors users with a high call arrival rate relative to their mobility rate.

22


6. Hybrid: – The local anchoring and replication techniques are

integrated together to reduce the location tracking cost. – The VLR associated with the MT subscriber's home or office is

selected as the local anchor where the MT reports its location change. Meanwhile, the local anchor's location is replicated at selected switches (called replicas) originating relatively high call rates to the MT.

– Only when the MT changes its local signaling transfer point (LSTP) (MSC connects to the SS7 network via LSTP) region, its local anchor is changed, which requires the updating of both the HLR and the replicas.

– The local anchor and replicas can supplement each other to reduce both the location update cost and the call setup delay.

– Compared to the IS-41 strategy, the integrated strategy always results in a smaller tracking cost.

23


• Distributed database architectures 1.One-root tree structure:

– The location databases form a tree with the root at the top. Each database contains the location information of every MT residing in its subtree. All non-leaf databases maintain a pointer to an adjacent lower-level database regarding an MT's location. The leaf databases acting like the VLRs in the centralized structure contain the user service profiles for those MTs within their respective coverage areas.

– When an MT's movement or call is local, i.e., the MT roams within the same or nearby LA or receives calls originating from the same or nearby LA, the upper-layer location databases are not accessed for the location update or call delivery. Thus, the access burden on the upper-level databases is alleviated and the end-to-end location update delay or call delivery delay is reduced.

– The drawback: the crash of the root may paralyze the entire system and the root database may become overloaded as the number of mobile users increases.

24


2. Multitree structure:

– The whole location database system is organized into a multitree structure. which consists of a number of subsystems that assume the tree structure and connect to each other only through their root databases.

– It overcomes the single point of failure issue in the one-root tree structure, since each root only maintains the profiles for those MTs residing in its service area and its failure does not affect the operation of other database subsystems.

– It is also scalable in that as the capacity of a root database is saturated, a new subsystem is readily added while keeping the end-to-end delays in location registration and call delivery unchanged.

– It is suitable for global mobile systems adopting a nongeographic personal telecommunication plan.

25


• Comparison to the 2 Database Architectures – Centralized structure

• Advantages: – Easy adaptation to current PLMN networks. – The number of database updates and queries is relatively small.

• Disadvantages: – As the number of MTs increases, the signaling traffic may degrade the

performance.

– Distributed Structure • Advantages:

– reducing the access burden on the centralized HLR .

• Disadvantages:– The number of database accesses is increased.

– No single scheme that clearly outperforms the others under all system parameters

26


• Location Update – The location update determine when or where an MT

should report its location to the network. – Static Schemes: e.g. IS-41.

• A location update is performed when a MT changes its LA.

• It cannot be adjusted based on the parameters of a MT from time to time.

– Dynamic Schemes: • It can be adjusted based on the parameters of a MT from time

to time.

• Most of the recent research focus on the dynamic schemes.

27


1. Profile-based: – The system maintains a list of the most probable LAs where

an MT may be located.

– As the MT moves between the LAs in the list, no location update is needed. Otherwise, the location update is performed according to the IS-41 scheme.

– When an incoming call arrives, the MT is searched from the most to the least likely LA within its LA list.

– This scheme requires that the LAs in the list be adjacent.

28


2. Time-based: – A MT performs location updates periodically at given

time intervals. – The time interval could be predefined or dynamically

changed based on each user's location probability distribution or the system load.

– One drawback of the time-based schemes is the difficulty of considering paging delay constraints while putting an upper bound on the paging cost.

29


3. Movement-based: – A MT performs a location update whenever it completes a

predefined number of movements across cell boundaries.

– The MT may move back and forth between cells, thereby triggering un necessary location updates.

– An improved movement-based scheme was proposed to eliminate the unnecessary location updates, where when an MT revisits a cell, the movement counter value is reduced to the smaller counter value associated with the MT's previous visit of this cell. This mechanism not only eliminates repeated counts of movements into the same cell, but also counts out the movements since the last visit to the cell during the same location update period. This makes the movement counter reach the movement threshold more slowly than in the basic movement-based scheme.

30


4. Distance-based: – A MT reports its location to the network when its

distance from the last location update point exceeds a distance threshold.

– A mechanism to compute the distance between two cells is required to implement this scheme.

– A method was proposed to determine the distance between two arbitrary cells in the hexagonal configuration.

– An irregular cell configuration would make the implementation of the distance-based scheme considerably more challenging.

31


5. Group registration scheme: – Instead of sending individual location update requests to the HLR

upon each LA change, the new location of all newly moved-in MTs to an LA since the last location update is reported to the HLR in a single location update request, which is conveyed to the HLR in the route response message of the next incoming call to any MT in the LA.

– Upon an LA change, a forwarding pointer is set up from the MT's local anchor (which is pointed to from the HLR) to its current VLR, so that incoming calls to the MT can be delivered before the MT's local anchor is changed to its current VLR via the next group registration.

32


• Terminal Paging – Search for and alert the intended MT of an incoming call.

1. Sequential paging: – The paging area is partitioned into several paging zones based on the user

location probability distribution and the paging delay constraint.

– As an incoming call arrives, the MT is searched sequentially from the most to the least likely paging zone.

– If the MT is found in a paging zone, the paging process stops.

– The user location probability distribution may not be readily available.

– An intra-LA location update strategy was proposed to reduce the paging cost. When an MT moves between its anchor cell, where it usually stays for a long period, and the rest of the cells within its current LA, an intra-LA location update is performed at the serving VLR of the current LA.

– As an incoming call arrives, either the anchor cell or the rest of the cells in the current LA is paged to locate the MT.

33


2. Intelligent paging: – The physical information of an MT such as the most

recent interaction point and velocity can be exploited to improve paging performance.

– Paging related information is used to predict the most likely where about of an MT and the MT is searched in the most probable location first as an incoming call arrives.

– Other factors such as traffic conditions and the cellular network topology may affect the accuracy of location prediction, and consequently the effectiveness of the intelligent paging strategy.

34


3. Optimal paging: – The optimal search theory with discrete efforts was

applied for paging an MT. – An optimal multi-step search plan is developed in such a

way that the probability of detecting the MT on or before each step is maximized.

– The execution of the optimal search plan requires that the system know the probability distribution of an MT in each cell within its current LA and the probabilities of the system failing to detect the MT on a single page in each cell given that the MT is in that cell.

35


4. Concurrent paging: – Multiple MTs can be paged simultaneously at different

cells within the same LA where these MTs reside. – An ensemble paging schedule should be designed in such

a way that the overall average paging cost is minimized under the paging delay constraint.

– Coordination among the pollings of the MTs should be provided to warrant that each MT is searched from the most to the least likely cell if each MT's location probability distribution is known. Otherwise, some heuristic algorithms can be applied to concurrently search the MTs.

36


• Comparison to Static and Dynamic Schemes for Update and Paging – Static (e. g. IS-41):

• Advantage: Easy to implement • Disadvantage: It cannot be adjusted according to the parameter

of individual user.

– Dynamic: • Advantage: allow online adjustments based on the

characteristics of each individual MT. • Disadvantage:

– Some required information such as the distance between cells is not available to the MTs.

– Require significant computing power. Implementation of a computation intensive scheme in an MT may not be feasible.

37

Conclusion• There is no straightforward solution that takes

account of the multiplicity of location management requirements

• Various approaches from multiple angles have been proposed to achieve advanced location management towards a complete solution.

• Each approach has pros and cons and is probably not enough by itself.

• Therefore, an accommodative and efficient location management solution is called for by the next-generation wireless system.

38

References[1] I. F. AKYILDIZ, etc. Mobility Management in Next Generation

Wireless Systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 87, No. 8 August 1999, pp. 1347-84.

[2]. R. JAIN AND Y.-B. LIN, An auxiliary user location strategy employing forwarding pointers to reduce network impacts of PCS;

ACM-Baltzer Journal of Wireless Networks, vol. 1, no. 2, July 1995, pp. 197-210.

[3]. J. S. M. Ho AND I. F. AKY1LDIZ, Local anchor scheme for reducing signaling costs in personal com munications networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 4, no. 5, Oct. 1996, pp. 709-725.

[4]. R..IAIN. Y.-B. L1N. C. LO. AND S. MOHAN, A caching strategy to reduce network impacts of PCS, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 12, no. 8, Oct. 1994, pp. 1434-1444.

39

References[5]. Z. MAO AND C. DOULIGERIS, An integrated strategy for

reducing location management cost, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 33-35.

[6]. N. SHIVAKUMAR, J. JANNINK, AND J. WIDOM. Per-user profile replication in mobile environments: Algorithms, analysis, and simulation results. ACM-Baltzer Journal of Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 2, no. 2, Oct. 1997, pp. 129-140.

[7]. Z. MAO AND C. DOULIGERIS, A distributed database architecture for global roaming in next-generation mobile networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2004, pp 146-160.

40

References[8]. S. TAI3BANE, An alternative strategy for location tracking, IEEE

Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 13, no. 5, June 1995, pp. 880-892

[9]. C. Rose, Minimizing the average cost of paging and registration: A timer-based method, ACM-Baltzer Journal of Wireless Networks, vol. 2, no. 2, 1996, pp. 109-116.

[10]. A. BAR-NOY, I. KESSLER. AND M. SIDI, Mobile users: To update or not to update? ACM-Baltzer Journal of Wireless Networks, vol. 1, no. 2, July 1995, pp. 175-186.

[11]. I. F. AKYILDIZ. J. S. M. Ho. AND Y.-B. L1N, Movement-based location update and selective pagings for PCS networks; IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 4, no. 4. Aug. 1996, pp. 629-638.

[12]. V. W. S. WONG AND V. C. M. LEUNG, An adaptive distance-based location update algorithm for next-generation PCS networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 19, no. 10, Oct. 2001, pp. 1942-1952.

41

References[13]. Z. MAO AND C. DOULIGERIS, Group registration for

reducing signaling traffic in location tracking, The 28th IEEE Local Computer Networks Conf. (LCN'2003), Bonn/Konigswinter, Germany, Oct. 20-24, 2003.

[14]. S. MISHRA AND O. K. TONGUZ, Analysis of intelligent paging in personal communication systems, Electronics Letters, January 1998, pp. 12-13.

[15]. R. REZAIIFAR AND A. M. MAKOWSKI, from optimal search theory to sequential paging in cellular networks, IEEE J. Select. Areas Common., vol. 15, no. 7, Sept. 1997, pp. 1253-1264.

[16]. R.H. GAU: AND Z. J. HAAS, Concurrent search of mobile users in cellular networks, IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 117-130.

[17]. Y. XIAO, A parallel shuffled paging strategy under delay bounds in wireless systems, IEEE Commu nications Letters, vol. 7, no. 8, Aug. 2003, pp. 367-369.

1 location management in wireless mobile network by:ali bohlooli instructor: dr nasser movahhedi nia...

Documents

hlrvisitor location

location registration

mts location

new location

location change

local anchors location

location request message

calling mt