1 plans and programs committee july 15, 2014 · and land use coordination category, the prop k...

DRAFT 2014 PROPOS IT ION K

5 -YEAR PR IOR IT IZAT ION PROGRAM

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE COORDINATION

Approved: [DATE]

Prepared for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority

By San Francisco County Transportat ion Authority

In Coordination with Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Department of Publ ic Works,

Peninsula Corr idor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB or Caltrain), Planning Department, and

San Francisco Municipal Transportat ion Agency (SFMTA)

1Item 6 Enclosure P Plans and Programs Committee July 15, 2014

DRAFT 2014 PROP K 5-YEAR PR IORIT IZATION PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Table of Contents

Eligibility

Prioritization Criteria

Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther

Table 1 - Prop K Leveraging

Table 2 - Project Delivery Snapshot

Table 3 - Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table

Table 4 – Prop K 5-Year Project List (FY 2014/15 – FY 2018/19)

Project Information Forms

2009 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as adopted)

2009 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as amended)

Eligibility

Eligibility as identified in the voter approved Prop K Expenditure Plan is as follows:

“Transportation and Land Use Coordination: Transportation studies and planning to support transit oriented development and neighborhood transportation planning. Local match for San Francisco and regional Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC)/Housing Incentive Program (HIP) grant programs that support transit oriented development and fund related improvements for transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians including streetscape beautification improvements such as landscaping, lighting and street furniture. Includes planning, project development and capital costs. Sponsoring Agencies: DPT, DPW, MUNI, Planning, SFCTA, BART, PCJPB. The first $17.6M is Priority 1 and the remainder is Priority 2. Total Funding: $33.6M; Prop K: $20.0M.”

DPT stands for Department of Parking and Traffic, and MUNI for San Francisco Municipal Railway. DPT and MUNI are now under the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). DPW stands for Department of Public Works, Planning for the Planning Department, SFCTA for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, BART for Bay Area Rapid Transit, and PCJPB for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain).

Prioritization Criteria

One of the key required elements of the 5YPPs is a transparent process for how projects get selected. Prop K requires at a minimum that each category include prioritization criteria that address project readiness, community support, and relative level of need or urgency. For this 5YPP update, the Citizens Advisory Committee requested that the Transportation Authority and project sponsors develop a user-friendly, transparent scoring table that could apply to all 5YPPs, and that the scoring prioritize safety and community input highly.

2

DRAFT 2014 PROP K 5-YEAR PR IORIT IZATION PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Table 3 shows the new Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table. Each project can receive a maximum of 20 points, with 10 points allocated programwide criteria and 10 points allocated for category specific criteria.

The Expenditure Plan also requires consideration of geographic equity in terms of project distribution that takes into account the various needs of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. The Transportation and Land Use Coordination category is the primary source for planning grants from the Transportation Authority’s Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP), which has been created in response to the San Francisco Transportation Plan’s (SFTP’s) call for addressing equity issues and improving mobility in neighborhoods citywide. Over the 5YPP period, each supervisorial district will have $100,000 in Prop K funds (ideally intended to leverage other funds) to use for district-identified community-based planning needs.

This category also helps to provide local match for various capital and planning grants, such as OneBayArea Grant, Caltrans Planning Grants, and Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grants. Given limited Prop K funds in this highly competitive Prop K category, the category-specific prioritization criteria generally give weight to projects with limited or no other opportunities to secure the needed local match, and to projects that benefit Communities of Concern.

Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther

Leveraging Prop K funds against non-Prop K fund sources (e.g., federal, state, other local funds) is necessary to fully fund the Expenditure Plan projects and programs. For the Transportation and Land Use Coordination category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax revenue spent, it would be leveraged by about $0.68 in non-Prop K funds. The table below compares Prop K Expenditure Plan assumptions with proposed leveraging in the 2014 5-year project lists.

Table 1. Prop K Leveraging1

Category Expected Leveraging (Non-Prop K Funds)

Proposed Leveraging (Non-Prop K Funds)

Transportation and Land Use Coordination

40% 80%

1 This table compares the expected leveraging assumed in the Expenditure Plan with the proposed leveraging assumed in the 5-Year Project List.

3

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otT

ran

spor

tati

on/

Lan

d U

se C

oord

inat

ion

Tab

le 2

a. P

rop

K F

un

ds

Allo

cate

d

5-Y

ear

Pri

orit

izat

ion

Pro

gram

(5Y

PP

) P

erio

d

Pro

gram

med

(A

vaila

ble

for

A

lloca

tion

)T

otal

Allo

cate

d a

s of

3/

31/

2014

% A

lloca

ted

2005

5Y

PP

(F

Y 2

004/

05-2

008/

09)

*$2

,467

,000

$1,7

33,0

0570

%20

09 5

YP

P (

FY

200

9/10

-20

13/

14)

*$3

,225

,721

$3,4

12,6

1210

6%T

otal

*$5

,145

,617

Tab

le 2

b. P

erce

nt

Com

ple

teT

able

s sh

ow a

lloca

tions

and

per

cent

com

plet

e th

roug

h M

arch

31,

201

4, b

ased

on

proj

ect s

pons

ors'

prog

ress

rep

orts

.

Com

ple

ted

Pro

ject

s/P

roje

ct P

has

es (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fis

cal Y

ear

of

Allo

cati

onP

roje

ct N

ame

Ph

ase(

s)

Fu

nd

edT

otal

Allo

cate

d a

s of

3/

31/

2014

% C

omp

lete

as o

f 3/

31/

2014

DP

W20

04/0

5B

road

way

Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

ts P

hase

II

Des

ign

$29,

000

100%

DP

W20

04/0

5Sa

n Jo

se/G

uerr

ero

Liv

able

Str

eets

Pla

nP

lann

ing

$8,9

9010

0%B

AR

T20

05/0

624

th S

tree

t Com

mun

ity P

lan

Upd

ate

Pla

nnin

g$2

5,00

010

0%SF

CT

A20

05/0

6L

and

Use

Mod

el A

lloca

tion

Too

lP

lann

ing

$25,

000

100%

SFC

TA

2005

/06

Mis

sion

Sou

th o

f C

have

z P

lan

Pla

nnin

g$5

0,00

010

0%SF

CT

A20

05/0

6St

reet

scap

e M

aste

r P

lan

Pla

nnin

g$9

0,00

010

0%SF

CT

A20

05/0

6T

ende

rloin

/Litt

le S

aigo

n N

eigh

borh

ood

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Pla

nP

lann

ing

$40,

000

100%

DP

W20

06/0

7B

road

way

Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

ts P

hase

II

Con

stru

ctio

n$2

31,0

0010

0%D

PW20

06/0

7R

enew

ed V

alen

cia

Stre

etsc

ape

Des

ign

$010

0%SF

CT

A20

06/0

7C

olum

bus

Ave

nue

Rev

italiz

atio

n M

aste

r P

lan

Pla

nnin

g$1

2,00

010

0%D

PW

2007

/08

Bro

adw

ay S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

Pha

se I

IC

onst

ruct

ion

$250

,415

100%

DP

W20

07/0

8L

elan

d A

venu

e St

reet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

tsD

esig

n$5

3,12

010

0%D

PW

2008

/09

Lel

and

Ave

nue

Stre

etsc

ape

Impr

ovem

ents

Con

stru

ctio

n$2

12,4

8010

0%D

PW20

08/0

9R

enew

ed V

alen

cia

Stre

etsc

ape

Con

stru

ctio

n$5

00,0

0010

0%SF

CT

A20

08/0

9B

ayvi

ew H

unte

rs P

t Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n P

lan

Pla

nnin

g$1

1,00

010

0%SF

CT

A20

08/0

9C

entr

al F

reew

ay/O

ctav

ia B

oule

vard

Circ

ulat

ion

Stud

yP

lann

ing

$90,

000

100%

SFC

TA

2008

/09

Eas

tern

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

ds T

rave

l Beh

avio

r Su

rvey

- P

hase

2P

lann

ing

$50,

000

100%

* F

unds

pro

gram

med

in th

e 20

09 5

YP

P m

ay in

clud

e pr

ogra

mm

ed b

ut u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds

from

the

2005

5Y

PP

, as

wel

l as

de-o

blig

ated

fun

ds.

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\Pr

ojec

t Del

iver

y\C

hapt

er 3

Pro

ject

Del

iver

y; E

P 4

4Pa

ge 1

of 3

4

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otT

ran

spor

tati

on/

Lan

d U

se C

oord

inat

ion

Com

ple

ted

Pro

ject

s/P

roje

ct P

has

es (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fis

cal Y

ear

of

Allo

cati

onP

roje

ct N

ame

Ph

ase(

s)

Fu

nd

edT

otal

Allo

cate

d a

s of

3/

31/

2014

% C

omp

lete

as o

f 3/

31/

2014

SFC

TA

2008

/09

Ten

derlo

in T

raff

ic C

alm

ing

and

Circ

ulat

ion

Impr

ovem

ents

P

lann

ing

$15,

000

100%

SFC

TA

2008

/09

Wes

tern

SoM

a N

eigh

borh

ood

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Pla

nnin

g St

udy

Pla

nnin

g$4

0,00

010

0%D

CP

2010

/11

Ces

ar C

have

z E

ast C

omm

unity

Des

ign

Pla

nP

lann

ing

$22,

729

100%

DP

W20

10/1

1B

road

way

Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

ts P

hase

III

Des

ign

$31,

000

100%

DP

W20

10/1

1F

olso

m S

tree

t Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

tsC

onst

ruct

ion

$604

,235

100%

DP

W20

10/1

1Se

cond

Str

eet S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

Des

ign

$3,2

0010

0%SF

CT

A20

10/1

1B

ayvi

ew H

unte

rs P

oint

Mob

ility

Sol

utio

ns S

tudy

Pla

nnin

g$2

0,00

010

0%SF

CT

A20

10/1

1C

esar

Cha

vez

Eas

t Com

mun

ity D

esig

n P

lan

Pla

nnin

g$0

100%

BA

RT

2011

/12

24th

Str

eet/

Mis

sion

BA

RT

Pla

za a

nd P

edes

tria

n Im

prov

emen

tsD

esig

n$3

03,0

4710

0%D

PW

2011

/12

24th

/ M

issi

on B

AR

T P

laza

Bus

Bul

bC

onst

ruct

ion

$179

,000

100%

SFC

TA

2011

/12

19th

Ave

nue

Tra

nsit

Cor

ridor

Inv

estm

ent S

tudy

Pla

nnin

g$1

01,4

0010

0%

Pro

ject

s/P

roje

ct P

has

es U

nd

erw

ay (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fis

cal Y

ear

of

Allo

cati

onP

roje

ct N

ame

Ph

ase(

s)

Fu

nd

edT

otal

Allo

cate

d a

s of

3/

31/

2014

% C

omp

lete

as o

f 3/

31/

2014

DP

W20

11/1

2B

road

way

Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

ts P

hase

III

Con

stru

ctio

n$2

45,0

005%

DP

W20

11/1

2M

arin

a G

reen

Bic

ycle

Tra

ilC

onst

ruct

ion

$113

,625

99%

SFC

TA

2011

/12

Bal

boa

Par

k St

atio

n A

rea

Circ

ulat

ion

Stud

yP

lann

ing

$65,

600

70%

BA

RT

2012

/13

24th

Str

eet M

issi

on B

AR

T S

W P

laza

and

Ped

estr

ian

Impr

ovem

ents

Con

stru

ctio

n$1

7,20

398

%D

PW

2012

/13

24th

St-

Mis

sion

BA

RT

Sid

ewal

k, C

urb,

and

Lan

dsca

ping

Con

stru

ctio

n$2

8,00

098

%D

PW

2012

/13

Bro

adw

ay S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

Pha

se I

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

$150

,000

97%

DP

W20

13/1

4E

R T

aylo

r E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l - S

afe

Rou

tes

to S

choo

lD

esig

n$1

9,26

90%

DP

W20

13/1

4E

R T

aylo

r E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l - S

afe

Rou

tes

to S

choo

lE

nviro

nmen

tal

$915

0%D

PW

2013

/14

Lon

gfel

low

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool -

Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sch

ool

Env

ironm

enta

l$9

150%

DP

W20

13/1

4L

ongf

ello

w S

choo

l - S

afe

Rou

tes

to S

choo

lD

esig

n$2

4,06

60%

SFC

TA

2013

/14

Bal

boa

Par

k St

atio

n A

rea

Cir

cula

tion

Stud

y -

Am

endm

ent

Pla

nnin

g$5

9,40

025

%SF

CT

A20

13/1

4B

road

way

Chi

nato

wn

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n P

lan

Pla

nnin

g, C

onst

r u$2

09,1

7415

%SF

MT

A20

13/1

4M

arke

t and

Hai

ght S

tree

t Tra

nsit

and

Ped

estr

ian

Impr

ovem

ents

Con

stru

ctio

n$2

09,0

000%

SFM

TA

2013

/14

Man

sell

Cor

ridor

Im

prov

emen

t Pro

ject

Des

ign

$330

,840

0%SF

CT

A20

13/1

4C

entr

al S

ubw

ay P

hase

3 -

Initi

al S

tudy

Pla

nnin

g$9

8,08

70%

DP

T20

13/1

419

th A

venu

e/M

-Oce

an V

iew

Pla

nnin

g$3

06,0

000%

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\Pr

ojec

t Del

iver

y\C

hapt

er 3

Pro

ject

Del

iver

y; E

P 4

4Pa

ge 2

of 3

5

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otT

ran

spor

tati

on/

Lan

d U

se C

oord

inat

ion

Pro

ject

s/P

roje

ct P

has

es U

nd

erw

ay (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fis

cal Y

ear

of

Allo

cati

onP

roje

ct N

ame

Ph

ase(

s)

Fu

nd

edT

otal

Allo

cate

d a

s of

3/

31/

2014

% C

omp

lete

as o

f 3/

31/

2014

DP

W20

13/1

42n

d St

reet

Im

prov

emen

tE

nviro

nmen

tal

$2,2

990%

DP

W20

13/1

42n

d St

reet

Im

prov

emen

tD

esig

n$1

70,5

430%

MU

NI

2013

/14

Cen

tral

Sub

way

Pha

se 3

- I

nitia

l Stu

dyP

lann

ing

$75,

125

0%P

CJP

B20

13/1

4C

altr

ain

Nor

th T

erm

inal

Stu

dyP

lann

ing

$22,

940

0%

For

mor

e in

form

atio

n on

Pro

p K

and

oth

er T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

fun

ded

proj

ects

, vis

it ht

tp:/

/ww

w.s

fcta

.org

/mys

tree

tsf-

proj

ects

-map

to a

cces

s an

in

tera

ctiv

e m

ap s

how

ing

proj

ects

in y

our

neig

hbor

hood

and

city

wid

e.

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\Pr

ojec

t Del

iver

y\C

hapt

er 3

Pro

ject

Del

iver

y; E

P 4

4Pa

ge 3

of 3

6

Tab

le 3

- P

rior

itiz

atio

n C

rite

ria

and

Sco

rin

g T

able

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

/L

and

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

n (

EP

44)

Pro

ject

Rea

din

ess

Com

mu

nit

y Su

pp

ort

Tim

e Se

nsi

tive

U

rgen

cySa

fety

Lim

ited

Loc

al

Mat

ch

Op

tion

s

Ben

efit

s C

omm

un

ity

of

Con

cern

Geo

grap

hic

E

qu

ity

Tot

al

On

e B

ay A

rea

Gra

nt

(OB

AG

) M

atch

T

otal

Pos

sib

le S

core

43

34

33

20

Broa

dway

Stre

etsc

ape

Impr

ovem

ent P

hase

IV4

33

41

318

Long

fello

w E

lemen

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rout

es

to S

choo

l4

23

31

013

ER

Taylo

r Elem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e Ro

utes

to

Scho

ol4

23

31

013

Man

sell

Corr

idor

Impr

ovem

ent

43

33

22

17Se

cond

Stre

et S

treet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

t4

23

41

317

OBA

G M

atch

(Cyc

le 2)

Pers

ia Tr

iangl

e Im

prov

emen

ts4

33

30

013

Nei

ghb

orh

ood

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Pla

nn

ing/

Cor

rid

or P

lan

nin

gT

otal

Pos

sib

le S

core

43

34

33

20N

eighb

orho

od T

rans

porta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent

Prog

ram

(NTI

P) P

lanni

ngLo

mba

rd S

treet

Ped

estri

an a

nd T

rans

it Tr

eatm

ents

[NTI

P]4

22

31

315

Wes

tern

Add

ition

Com

mun

ity B

ased

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Plan

[NTI

P]4

22

42

317

Plan

ning

Gra

nt M

atch

(e.g

. Calt

rans

Plan

ning

G

rant

s)M

TC

Pri

orit

y D

evel

opm

ent

Are

as P

lan

nin

g M

atch

Tot

al P

ossi

ble

Sco

re4

33

33

22

20

Prio

rity

Dev

elopm

ent A

rea

Plan

ning

Mat

ch

PR

OP

K P

RO

GR

AM

-WID

E C

RIT

ER

I AC

AT

EG

OR

Y-S

PE

CIF

IC C

RIT

ER

IA

Loca

tions

will

be

scor

ed a

t the

tim

e of

allo

catio

n. S

ee te

xt a

nd P

rojec

t Inf

orm

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r mor

e de

tails

.

Loca

tions

will

be

scor

ed a

t the

tim

e of

allo

catio

n. S

ee te

xt a

nd P

rojec

t Inf

orm

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r mor

e de

tails

.

Loca

tions

will

be

scor

ed a

t the

tim

e of

allo

catio

n. S

ee te

xt a

nd P

rojec

t Inf

orm

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r mor

e de

tails

.

Loca

tions

will

be

scor

ed a

t the

tim

e of

allo

catio

n. S

ee te

xt a

nd P

rojec

t Inf

orm

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r mor

e de

tails

.

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

3 Pr

iori

tizat

ion\

EP44

Pri

oriti

zatio

nPa

ge 1

of 2

7

Tab

le 3

- P

rior

itiz

atio

n C

rite

ria

and

Sco

rin

g T

able

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

/L

and

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

n (

EP

44)

Pri

orit

izat

ion

Cri

teri

a D

efin

itio

ns:

Safe

ty: O

ne p

oint

for e

ach:

Add

ress

es d

emon

stra

ted

safe

ty is

sue;

redu

ces p

oten

tial c

onfli

cts b

etw

een

mod

es; b

enef

its u

sers

of m

ultip

le m

odes

; and

incr

ease

s sec

urity

.

Ben

efit

s a

Com

mu

nit

y of

Con

cern

(C

oC):

Pro

ject i

s loc

ated

with

in a

CoC

as d

efin

ed b

y M

TC (o

ne p

oint

); w

ill d

irect

ly be

nefit

the

iden

tified

nee

ds o

f a C

oC (t

wo

poin

ts) o

r w

ill g

ener

ally

bene

fit th

e ne

eds o

f a C

oC (o

ne p

oint

). Fo

r mor

e de

tail

on C

oCs,

visit

MTC

's in

tera

ctiv

e Co

C m

ap p

age

at h

ttp:/

/bit.

ly/Sz

gKX

G.

Pro

ject

Rea

din

ess:

Pro

ject l

ikely

to n

eed

fund

ing

in fi

scal

year

pro

pose

d. F

acto

rs to

be

cons

ider

ed in

clude

ade

quac

y of

scop

e, sc

hedu

le, b

udge

t and

fund

ing

plan

relat

ive

to c

urre

nt p

rojec

t sta

tus (

e.g.

expe

ct m

ore

deta

il an

d ce

rtain

ty fo

r a p

rojec

t abo

ut to

ent

er c

onst

ruct

ion

than

des

ign)

; whe

ther

prio

r pro

ject p

hase

s are

com

plet

ed o

r exp

ecte

d to

be

com

plet

ed b

efor

e be

ginn

ing

the

next

pha

se; a

nd

whe

ther

litig

atio

n, c

omm

unity

opp

ositi

on o

r oth

er fa

ctor

s may

sign

ifica

ntly

delay

pro

ject.

Com

mu

nit

y Su

pp

ort:

Pro

ject h

as c

lear a

nd d

iver

se c

omm

unity

supp

ort a

nd/o

r was

it id

entif

ied th

roug

h a

com

mun

ity-b

ased

plan

ning

pro

cess

. An

exam

ple

of a

com

mun

ity-b

ased

plan

is a

ne

ighb

orho

od tr

ansp

orta

tion

plan

, but

not

a c

ount

ywid

e pl

an o

r age

ncy

capi

tal i

mpr

ovem

ent p

rogr

am.

Thre

e po

ints

for a

pro

ject i

n an

ado

pted

com

mun

ity b

ased

plan

with

evi

denc

e of

div

erse

com

mun

ity su

ppor

t.Tw

o po

ints

for a

pro

ject w

ith e

vide

nce

of su

ppor

t fro

m b

oth

neig

hbor

hood

stak

ehol

ders

and

gro

ups a

nd c

ityw

ide

grou

ps.

One

poi

nt fo

r a p

rojec

t with

evi

denc

e of

supp

ort f

rom

eith

er n

eighb

orho

od st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd g

roup

s or c

ityw

ide

grou

ps.

Tim

e Se

nsi

tive

Urg

ency

: Pro

ject n

eeds

to p

roce

ed in

pro

pose

d tim

efra

me

to e

nabl

e co

nstru

ctio

n co

ordi

natio

n w

ith a

noth

er p

rojec

t (e.g

., m

inim

ize

cost

s and

con

stru

ctio

n im

pact

s); t

o su

ppor

t ano

ther

fu

nded

or p

ropo

sed

proj

ect (

e.g. n

ew si

gnal

cont

rolle

rs n

eed

to b

e in

stall

ed to

supp

ort T

EP

impl

emen

tatio

n); o

r to

mee

t tim

ely u

se o

f fun

ds d

eadl

ines

ass

ociat

ed w

ith m

atch

ing

fund

s.

Lim

ited

Loc

al M

atch

Op

tion

s: P

rojec

t has

no

or li

mite

d ot

her o

ptio

ns (i

nclu

ding

oth

er P

rop

K c

ateg

ories

and

non

-Pro

p K

fund

s) to

pro

vide

mat

ch to

an

exte

rnal

gran

t.

Geo

grap

hic

Eq

uit

y: P

oint

s will

be

give

n to

add

ress

geo

grap

hic

equi

ty.

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

3 Pr

iori

tizat

ion\

EP44

Pri

oriti

zatio

nPa

ge 2

of 2

8

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

DP

WB

road

way

Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

t Pha

se I

V

CO

N

Pla

nned

$701

,886

$701

,886

DP

WL

ongf

ello

w E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sc

hool

C

ON

P

lann

ed$6

1,86

5$6

1,86

5

DP

WE

R T

aylo

r E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sc

hool

CO

N

Pla

nned

$47,

140

$47,

140

SFM

TA

Man

sell

Cor

ridor

Im

prov

emen

t C

ON

P

lann

ed$5

58,0

63$5

58,0

63

DP

WSe

cond

Str

eet S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ent

CO

N

Pla

nned

$1,4

39,5

84$1

,439

,584

Any

Elig

ible

OB

AG

Loc

al M

atch

(Cyc

le 2

)A

nyP

lann

ed$1

,250

,000

$1,2

50,0

00

SFM

TA

Per

sia

Tria

ngle

Tra

nsit

Impr

ovem

ents

CO

N

Pla

nned

$200

,685

$200

,685

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Im

prov

emen

t Pla

nnin

g (N

TIP

)/C

orrid

or P

lann

ing

Any

Elig

ible

Lom

bard

Str

eet T

rans

it an

d P

edes

tria

n T

reat

men

ts [N

TIP

] P

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

00,0

00$1

00,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Wes

tern

Add

ition

Com

mun

ity B

ased

T

rans

port

atio

n P

lan

(NT

IP)

PL

AN

/CE

R

Pla

nned

$240

,000

$240

,000

Any

Elig

ible

NT

IP P

lann

ing

PL

AN

/CE

R

Pla

nned

$300

,000

$300

,000

Any

Elig

ible

NT

IP P

lann

ing

PL

AN

/CE

R

Pla

nned

$600

,000

$600

,000

SFM

TA

/SF

CT

AN

TIP

Pre

-Dev

elo p

men

t/P

rogr

am S

uppo

rtP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

SFM

TA

/SF

CT

AN

TIP

Pre

-Dev

elo p

men

t/P

rogr

am S

uppo

rtP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

SFM

TA

/SF

CT

AN

TIP

Pre

-Dev

elo p

men

t/P

rogr

am S

uppo

rtP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

SFM

TA

/SF

CT

AN

TIP

Pre

-Dev

elo p

men

t/P

rogr

am S

uppo

rtP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

00,0

00$1

00,0

00

SFM

TA

/SF

CT

AN

TIP

Pre

-Dev

elo p

men

t/P

rogr

am S

uppo

rtP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

00,0

00$1

00,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Prio

rity

Dev

elop

men

t Are

a P

lann

ing

Mat

chP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$4

00,0

00$4

00,0

00

Any

Elig

ible

Prio

rity

Dev

elop

men

t Are

a P

lann

ing

Mat

chP

LA

N/C

ER

P

lann

ed$1

00,0

00$1

00,0

00

Reg

iona

l Prio

rity

Are

as P

lann

ing

Mat

ch

One

Bay

Are

a G

rant

(OB

AG

) Mat

ch

Stat

usF

isca

l Yea

rT

otal

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

/L

and

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

n (

EP

44)

Pro

gram

min

g

Tab

le 4

- D

raft

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear

Pro

ject

Lis

t (F

Y 2

014/

15 -

201

8/19

)

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

1 Pr

ojec

t Lis

t\EP

44

Proj

ect L

ist

Tab

: 06.

20.1

4Pa

ge 1

of 4

9

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

Stat

usF

isca

l Yea

rT

otal

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

$2,3

59,6

39

$2,3

39,5

84

$1,9

50,0

00

$250

,000

$3

50,0

00

$7,2

49,2

23

$1,9

51,1

53

$522

,500

$5

46,0

13

$570

,583

$5

96,2

59

$4,1

86,5

08

($40

8,48

6)($

2,22

5,57

0)($

3,62

9,55

7)($

3,30

8,97

4)($

3,06

2,71

5)($

3,06

2,71

5)

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

201

3 St

rate

gic

Pla

n B

asel

ine

Cu

mu

lati

ve R

emai

nin

g P

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acit

y

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

1 Pr

ojec

t Lis

t\EP

44

Proj

ect L

ist

Tab

: 06.

20.1

4Pa

ge 2

of 4

10

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

One

Bay

Are

a G

rant

(OB

AG

) Mat

ch

Bro

adw

ay S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ent P

hase

IV

C

ON

$3

50,9

43$3

50,9

43$7

01,8

86

Lon

gfel

low

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rou

tes

to

Scho

ol

CO

N

$61,

865

$61,

865

ER

Tay

lor

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rou

tes

to

Scho

olC

ON

$4

7,14

0$4

7,14

0

Man

sell

Cor

ridor

Im

prov

emen

t C

ON

$0

$558

,063

$558

,063

Seco

nd S

tree

t Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

t C

ON

$7

19,7

92$7

19,7

92$1

,439

,584

OB

AG

Loc

al M

atch

(Cyc

le 2

)A

ny$2

50,0

00$5

00,0

00$5

00,0

00$1

,250

,000

Per

sia

Tria

ngle

Tra

nsit

Impr

ovem

ents

CO

N

$200

,685

$200

,685

Pla

nnin

g (N

TIP

)/C

orrid

or P

lann

ing

Lom

bard

Str

eet T

rans

it an

d P

edes

tria

n T

reat

men

ts [N

TIP

] P

LA

N/C

ER

$1

00,0

00$1

00,0

00

Wes

tern

Add

ition

Com

mun

ity B

ased

T

rans

port

atio

n P

lan

(NT

IP)

PL

AN

/CE

R

$120

,000

$120

,000

$240

,000

NT

IP P

lann

ing

PL

AN

/CE

R

$300

,000

$300

,000

NT

IP P

lann

ing

PL

AN

/CE

R

$600

,000

$600

,000

NT

IP P

re-D

evel

opm

ent/

Pro

gram

Sup

port

PL

AN

/CE

R

$150

,000

$150

,000

NT

IP P

re-D

evel

opm

ent/

Pro

gram

Sup

port

PL

AN

/CE

R

$150

,000

$150

,000

NT

IP P

re-D

evel

opm

ent/

Pro

gram

Sup

port

PL

AN

/CE

R

$150

,000

$150

,000

NT

IP P

re-D

evel

opm

ent/

Pro

gram

Sup

port

PL

AN

/CE

R

$100

,000

$100

,000

NT

IP P

re-D

evel

opm

ent/

Pro

gram

Sup

port

PL

AN

/CE

R

$100

,000

$100

,000

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)P

LA

N/C

ER

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

Re g

iona

l Prio

rity

Are

as P

lann

ing

Mat

ch

Prio

rity

Dev

elop

men

t Are

a P

lann

ing

Mat

chP

LA

N/C

ER

$2

00,0

00$2

00,0

00$4

00,0

00

Prio

rity

Dev

elop

men

t Are

a P

lann

ing

Mat

chP

LA

N/C

ER

$5

0,00

0$5

0,00

0$1

00,0

00

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

al

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

/L

and

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

n (

EP

44)

Cas

h F

low

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

Tab

le 4

- D

raft

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear

Pro

ject

Lis

t (F

Y 2

014/

15 -

201

8/19

)

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

1 Pr

ojec

t Lis

t\EP

44

Proj

ect L

ist

Tab

: 06.

20.1

4Pa

ge 3

of 4

11

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

alP

roje

ct N

ame

Pha

se

$1,3

30,6

33

$2,6

48,7

98

$1,4

69,7

92

$950

,000

$8

00,0

00

$50,

000

$7,2

49,2

23

$1,1

40,0

00

$522

,500

$5

46,0

13

$570

,583

$5

96,2

59

$623

,091

$7

,560

,590

($

190,

633)

($2,

316,

931)

($3,

240,

710)

($3,

620,

127)

($3,

823,

868)

($3,

250,

777)

$311

,367

Tot

al C

ash

Flo

w in

5Y

PP

Tot

al C

ash

Flo

w in

201

3 St

rate

gic

Pla

n B

asel

ine

Cu

mu

lati

ve R

emai

nin

g C

ash

Flo

w C

apac

ity

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

1 Pr

ojec

t Lis

t\EP

44

Proj

ect L

ist

Tab

: 06.

20.1

4Pa

ge 4

of 4

12

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Category:

Subcategory:

Prop K EP Project/Program:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Name:

Project Location:

Project Supervisorial District(s):

Project Description:

Purpose and Need:

Community Engagement/Support:

Implementing Agency:

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:

Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated):

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % CompleteIn-house -

Contracted - Both

Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 100% In-house 2 2012/13 4 2012/13

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 90% In-house 4 2012/13 4 2013/14

Design Engineering (PS&E) 20% In-house 3 2013/14 2 2014/15

R/W Activities/Acquisition

Advertise Construction 2 2014/15 4 2014/2015

Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% Both 4 2014/15

End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) 3 2015/16

Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock)

Project Close-out 3 2016/17

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

D. TSM/Strategic Initiatives

44

2014/15

Project Information

38

ii. Transportation/Land Use Coordination

b. Transportation/Land Use Coordination

Broadway between Columbus Avenue and the Broadway Tunnel

Broadway Streetscape Improvement Phase IV

Comments/Concerns

3

In partnership with the Chinatown Community Development Center, the Planning Department, DPW, and SFMTA conducted an extensive outreach to better understand the needs and concerns of local residents, including four community meetings with translation. For more information on the public outreach and conceptual design stage of the project, please visit the Planning Department's Chinatown Broadway Street design page <http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=2646>. This project is consistent with the Chinatown Area Plan, Objective 7 and Policy 7.1.

Department of Public Works

John Dennis

(415) 558-4495

[email protected]

This is a cycle 1 OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) project. The overall project includes calming traffic by narrowing the roadway and travel lanes; improving pedestrian crossings with bulb-outs, raised crosswalks, and special paving; improving transit access with new bus bulbs and enhanced bus stops; landscaping the existing sidewalk, new medians, and the Wayne Place; installing bike sharrows; and adding new benches and street lights. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) is also implementing the Jean Parker Elementary School Safe Routes to School project as part of this project. More detail can be found on Department of Public Works' (DPW's) project page <http://sfdpw.org/index.aspx?page=1753>.

Broadway in Chinatown is one of the most recognizable districts in the city. With neighborhood-serving retail, schools, large-scale housing developments, and distinct historic character, great volumes of people travel to and through daily. This project aims to provide a safer and more pleasant walking experience, with new paving, streetlights, street trees, and street furnishings inspired by the unique history of the neighborhood.

Start Date End Date

Categorically Exempt

CEQA completed; NEPA underway

CEQA 3/29/13; NEPA anticipated 6/30/14

Environmental Clearance

Page 1 of 2

13

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

-$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

30,0

00$

30,0

00$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

880,

851

$

5,68

6$

87

5,16

5$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n6,

191,

635

$

701,

886

$

5,

489,

749

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

7,10

2,48

6$

70

7,57

2$

6,39

4,91

4$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al10

%90

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

27,6

00$

2,40

0$

30

,000

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

160,

072

$

13,9

19$

173,

991

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p A

AA

lloca

ted

13/1

460

0,00

0$

50

,000

$

65

0,00

0$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Stat

e SR

2SA

lloca

ted

13/1

451

,174

$

51

,174

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p K

EP

38

Allo

cate

d13

/14

5,68

6$

5,

686

$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

rogr

amm

ed14

/15

2,55

8,27

3$

2,

558,

273

$

5,11

6,54

5$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

K E

P 4

4P

lann

ed14

/15

350,

943

$

35

0,94

3$

701,

886

$

Con

stru

ctio

nSt

ate

SR2S

Allo

cate

d14

/15

335,

884

$

33

5,88

4$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

K E

P 3

8A

lloca

ted

13/1

437

,320

$

37

,320

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r84

4,53

2$

3,

348,

739

$

2,90

9,21

6$

-

$

-

$

-

$

7,

102,

486

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Fun

ding

pla

n is

bas

ed o

n F

Y 2

013/

14 a

lloca

tion

of f

unds

for

des

ign

phas

e.T

he S

tate

Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sch

ool (

SR2S

) Gra

nt a

mou

nt is

for

the

capi

tal p

roje

ct o

nly,

not

incl

udin

g no

n-in

fras

truc

ture

ele

men

ts.

Bro

adw

ay S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ent P

hase

IV

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

14


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:




Contracted - Both











Comments/Concerns

11

A recommendation for bulb-outs was made as a result of a Longfellow Elementary School Walking Audit in May 2010. The community strongly supports the bulb-outs. Project staff will periodically update the school staff and immediate neighborhood residents and businesses on the project schedule.


Kenneth Spielman

(415) 558-4519

[email protected]

This project includes 6 new pedestrian bulb-outs at the intersections of Mission and Whittier Streets, Mission Street and Whipple Avenue, and Mission and Lowell Streets, rectangular rapid flashing beacons at the intersection of Mission Street and Whipple Avenue, and landscaping (if feasible) near Longfellow Elementary School. This is an OBAG cycle 1 project with Prop K funds proposed for local match.

Bulb-outs will create shorter pedestrian crossings, improve sight distance by increasing visibility of pedestrians waiting to cross, and help prevent speeding turns. Of Longfellow Elementary School's 600 students, roughly 35 percent walk to school. Situated just south of Mission Street, the school is located in a Community of Concern and in close proximity to affordable housing. The school and surrounding area are accessible by several Muni routes, which are all part of the Mission Street MUNI Rapid Network and connect to BART. Many students and adults using transit to enter and exit the area access that transit on foot and will benefit from pedestrian safety improvements.

Start Date End Date


Underway

06/30/14




44

2014/15

Project Information



Mission Street between Lowell and Whittier Streets

Longfellow Elementary School Safe Routes to School

Page 1 of 2

15

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

17,4

83$

17,4

83$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

8,62

7$

91

5$

7,71

2$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

209,

166

$

24,0

66$

18

5,10

0$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n53

9,36

0$

61

,865

$

477,

495

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

774,

636

$

86,8

46$

68

7,79

0$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al11

%89

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

SFM

TA

Ope

ratin

gA

lloca

ted

09/1

017

,483

$

17

,483

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Pro

p K

Allo

cate

d13

/14

915

$

91

5$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

7,71

2$

7,

712

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p K

Allo

cate

d13

/14

13,7

52$

10,3

14$

24,0

66$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

105,

507

$

79,5

93$

185,

100

$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

KP

lann

ed14

/15

61,8

65$

61,8

65$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

lann

ed14

/15

477,

495

$

47

7,49

5$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r14

5,36

9$

62

9,26

7$

-$

-

$

-

$

-

$

77

4,63

6$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Fun

ding

pla

n is

bas

ed o

n F

Y 2

013/

14 a

lloca

tion

of f

unds

for

des

ign

phas

e.

Lon

gfel

low

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rou

tes

to S

choo

l

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

16


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:




Contracted - Both













44

2014/15

Project Information



Bacon and Goettingen Streets

ER Taylor Elementary School Safe Routes to School

Comments/Concerns

11

A recommendation for bulb-outs was made as a result of a ER Taylor Elementary School Walking Audit in January 2011. Project staff has also spoken to the residents immediately adjacent to the intersection on the phone, and met with school principal and staff as well as the manager of the adjacent library. The community strongly supports the bulb-outs. Project staff will periodically update the school staff and immediate neighborhood residents and businesses on the project schedule.


Kenneth Spielman

(415) 558-4519

[email protected]

The scope includes 8 new pedestrian bulb outs at the intersection of Bacon and Goettingen Streets. This is an OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) funded project with Prop K funds proposed for local match.

Bulb-outs will create shorter pedestrian crossings, improve sight distance by increasing visibility of pedestrians waiting to cross, and help prevent speeding turns. Of ER Taylor Elementary School's 600 students, roughly 30 percent walk to school. The intersection of Bacon and Goettingen Streets is a busy vehicular intersection with a high number of student-age pedestrians. This project will improve the safety of students and other pedestrians within the area.

Start Date End Date


Underway

06/30/14


Page 1 of 2

17

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

17,6

18$

17,6

18$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

8,70

4$

91

5$

7,78

9$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

167,

266

$

19,2

69$

14

7,99

7$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n41

0,98

5$

47

,140

$

363,

845

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

604,

573

$

67,3

24$

53

7,24

9$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al11

%89

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

SFM

TA

Ope

ratin

gA

lloca

ted

09/1

017

,618

$

17

,618

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Pro

p K

Allo

cate

d13

/14

915

$

91

5$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

7,78

9$

7,

789

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p K

Allo

cate

d13

/14

11,0

11$

8,25

8$

19

,269

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

84,3

58$

63,6

39$

147,

997

$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

KP

lann

ed14

/15

47,1

40$

47,1

40$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

lann

ed14

/15

363,

845

$

36

3,84

5$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r12

1,69

1$

482,

882

$

-

$

-$

-$

-$

604,

573

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Fun

ding

pla

n is

bas

ed o

n F

Y 2

013/

14 a

lloca

tion

of f

unds

for

des

ign

phas

e.

ER

Tay

lor

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rou

tes

to S

choo

l

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

18


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:Completion Date (Actual or Anticipated):



Contracted - Both


Planning/Conceptual Engineering 100% In-house 3 2012/13 4 2012/13











44

2014/15

Project Information



Mansell Street in McLaren Park between Visitacion Avenue and Sunnydale Avenue

Mansell Corridor Improvement

Comments/Concerns

9, 10, 11

This project reflects the community's concerns and needs as identified through RPD's 2010 McLaren Park Needs Assessment workshops and refined through additional outreach, including a site walk and community meetings in 2013.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

John Dennis (DPW)

(415) 558-4495

[email protected]

In partnership with the Recreation and Parks Department (RPD) and Department of Public Works (DPW), SFMTA will implement the following elements as Phase 1 of this OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) complete streets project:- reduction of the number of vehicular lanes from four to two (one lane each way);- separation of vehicular traffic to the south side of the median between Visitacion and Brazil;- a multiuse path on the north side of the median; - sidewalks along the south side of Mansell from Visitacion/Mansell to Persia/Sunnydale;- class II and III bicycle facilities between Brazil and Dublin;- raised crosswalks and flashing beacons at all unimproved intersections; - a corner bulb-out at Mansell/Sunnydale; and- street-level lighting and site furnishings.Phase 2 elements, e.g. trees, landscape, and public art, will be included in the construction contract bid documents as alternates and will be implemented concurrently with Phase 1 if additional funding gets secured. For more information, visit DPW's project page <http://sfdpw.org/index.aspx?page=1789>.

Mansell Street is a divided highway in the middle of McLaren Park, the largest park in southeastern San Francisco. The park serves as both a regional and neighborhood recreation facility for this area, especially for many low income communities. Primarily designed for auto traffic, existing facilities do not support multi-modal travel or foster community vitality. This project will improve safety and access of residents, commuters, and park users to and through the park and encourage walking and biking.

Start Date End Date


Underway

09/30/14


Page 1 of 2

19

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

311,

471

$

172,

724

$

13

8,74

7$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

88,8

24$

88,2

59$

56

5$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

743,

693

$

330,

840

$

41

2,85

3$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n4,

531,

048

$

558,

063

$

3,

972,

985

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

5,67

5,03

6$

1,14

9,88

6$

4,

525,

150

$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al20

%80

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

EP

39

Allo

cate

d12

/13

53,6

12$

53,6

12$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

EP

40

Allo

cate

d12

/13

119,

112

$

119,

112

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

RP

D in

-kin

d an

d op

erat

ing

Allo

cate

d12

/13

138,

747

$

138,

747

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Pro

p K

EP

39

Allo

cate

d13

/14

44,1

29$

44,1

29$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Pro

p K

EP

40

Allo

cate

d13

/14

44,1

30$

44,1

30$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

RP

D in

-kin

d an

d op

erat

ing

Allo

cate

d13

/14

565

$

56

5$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p K

EP

44

Allo

cate

d13

/14

-$

33

0,84

0$

330,

840

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p A

AA

lloca

ted

13/1

420

2,22

8$

20

2,22

8$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

76,7

18$

133,

907

$

21

0,62

5$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

K E

P 4

4P

lann

ed14

/15

558,

063

$

55

8,06

3$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

AA

Pro

gram

med

14/1

52,

325,

624

$

2,32

5,62

4$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

rogr

amm

ed14

/15

1,55

1,61

4$

1,

551,

614

$

Con

stru

ctio

nR

PD

Pro

gram

med

14/1

595

,747

$

95

,747

$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r67

9,24

1$

46

4,74

7$

4,53

1,04

8$

-

$

-

$

-

$

5,

675,

036

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Fun

ding

pla

n is

bas

ed o

n F

Y 2

013/

14 a

lloca

tion

of f

unds

for

des

ign

phas

e.

Man

sell

Cor

ridor

Im

prov

emen

t

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

20


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:




Contracted - Both


Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) In-house 4 2011/12 4 2012/13

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) Both 1 2013/14 2 2014/15

Design Engineering (PS&E) In-house 3 2013/14 4 2014/15







Comments/Concerns

6

Second Street was identified by the community as a primary pedestrian, bicycle and transit thoroughfare and a ‘green connector’ for the neighborhood as part of the 2008 East SoMa Area Plan, which is included in the City’s 2009 Eastern Neighborhoods Plan. Second Street is also identified as a bicycle route in the City’s bicycle network, and a proposed bike lane design was one of the projects evaluated in the Bicycle Plan EIR. DPW, SFMTA, and the Planning Department conducted extensive public outreach, including four community meetings, door-to-door visits to all buildings on Second Street between Market and King Streets, and meetings with neighborhood and merchant associations.


Cristina Olea

(415) 558-4004

[email protected]

This cycle 1 OneBayArea Grant (OBAG)-funded project will transform the 2nd Street corridor to a pedestrian and bicycle-friendly complete street by implementing wider sidewalks, buffered and raised cycletracks, lane reduction, pedestrian safety improvements, bus stop improvements, a new traffic signal, and associated sewer rehabilitation. To accommodate the proposed project, some on-street parking may be removed along the corridor. More detail can be found on Department of Public Works' (DPW's) project page <http://www.sfdpw.org/index.aspx?page=1489>.

Second Street is a heavily used multi-modal corridor, designated as a key walking and biking route. The street is also served by 10 and 12 Muni bus routes. This project will improve safety, provide a more attractive pedestrian environment, provide a dedicated bicycle facility, and improve Muni travel time.

Start Date End Date

Supplemental Focused EIR

Underway

11/30/14




44

2015/16

Project Information

39



Second Street between Market and King Streets

Second Street Streetscape Improvement

Page 1 of 2

21

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

-$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

489,

531

$

2,29

9$

48

7,23

2$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

1,48

6,86

5$

17

0,54

3$

1,31

6,32

2$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n11

,871

,264

$

1,

549,

584

$

10,3

21,6

80$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

13,8

47,6

60$

1,72

2,42

6$

12

,125

,234

$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al12

%88

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Pro

p K

EP

44

Allo

cate

d13

/14

862

$

1,

437

$

2,29

9$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

6,56

6$

11

,180

$

17

,746

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Gen

eral

Fun

dA

lloca

ted

13/1

417

3,71

0$

29

5,77

6$

469,

486

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Pro

p K

EP

44

Allo

cate

d13

/14

34,1

09$

136,

434

$

17

0,54

3$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

OB

AG

Allo

cate

d13

/14

263,

264

$

1,05

3,05

8$

1,

316,

322

$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

K E

P 4

4P

lann

ed15

/16

719,

792

$

71

9,79

2$

1,

439,

584

$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

K E

P 3

9P

lann

ed15

/16

55,0

00$

55,0

00$

11

0,00

0$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

rogr

amm

ed15

/16

4,59

0,84

0$

4,

590,

840

$

9,

181,

680

$

Con

stru

ctio

nG

ener

al F

und

Pro

gram

med

15/1

657

0,00

0$

570,

000

$

1,14

0,00

0$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r47

8,51

1$

1,

497,

885

$

5,93

5,63

2$

5,

935,

632

$

-$

-$

13,8

47,6

60$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Fun

ding

pla

n is

bas

ed o

n F

Y 2

013/

14 a

lloca

tion

of f

unds

for

des

ign

phas

e.

Seco

nd S

tree

t Str

eets

cape

Im

prov

emen

t

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

22


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:




Contracted - Both


Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%)

Environmental Studies (PA&ED)

Design Engineering (PS&E)


Advertise Construction

Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract)

End Construction (i.e. Open for Use)


Project Close-out

MTC created OBAG to better integrate the region's federal transportation program with California's climate law (SB 375, Steinberg, 2008) and the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). MTC designed OBAG to reward communities and neighborhoods that have a track record of and/or plans in place to support TOD, particularly in areas that are slated for accepting growth in housing and/or employment. Federal funds typically require at least 11.47% local match.

This is a placeholder. Schedule will be determined when projects are identified.

TBD

OBAG prioritizes projects with clear and diverse (e.g. broad) community support, as demonstrated through letters of support, adopted plans and community meetings regarding the project, with a preference for projects identified in adopted plans that were developed with community input (e.g. area plans, traffic calming plans, neighborhood transportation plans).

TBD

This placeholder will provide local match for the second cycle of the OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) program, which supports multi-modal travel, livable communities and transit oriented development (TOD), particularly in areas that are slated for accepting growth in housing and/or employment (Priority Development Areas or PDAs). Key OBAG criteria include projects in High Impact Areas, multi-modal/complete streets projects, and projects that will comply with stringent timely use of funds requirements. Most of the funds need to be spent in or in projects provide proximate access to PDAs. For definitions and more details, visit the San Francisco County Transportation Authority's (SFCTA's) Cycle 1 OBAG page <http://www.sfcta.org/funding-opportunities/onebayarea-grant>.

As the Congestion Management Agency for San Francisco, SFCTA is responsible for prioritizing San Francisco's share of OBAG funds consistent with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC's) OBAG guidelines. Priority for limited Prop K OBAG local match funds will be given to projects that have no or limited alternate sources of matching funds (including other Prop K categories and non-Prop K funds).

Start Date End Date


Comments/Concerns



44

2016/17

TBD

Project Information


OneBayArea Grant - Local Match (Cycle 2)


Page 1 of 2

23

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

-$

-

$

-$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

R/W

-$

-

$

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n7,

800,

000

$

1,25

0,00

0$

6,

550,

000

$

Pla

ceho

lder

for

any

pro

ject

pha

se.

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

-

$

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

7,80

0,00

0$

1,

250,

000

$

6,55

0,00

0$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al16

%84

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

KP

lann

ed16

/17

250,

000

$

25

0,00

0$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

lann

ed16

/17

2,00

0,00

0$

2,

000,

000

$

Con

stru

ctio

nT

BD

Pla

nned

16/1

725

0,00

0$

250,

000

$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

KP

lann

ed17

/18

500,

000

$

50

0,00

0$

1,00

0,00

0$

Con

stru

ctio

nO

BA

GP

lann

ed17

/18

1,65

0,00

0$

1,

650,

000

$

3,30

0,00

0$

Con

stru

ctio

nT

BD

Pla

nned

17/1

850

0,00

0$

500,

000

$

1,

000,

000

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r-

$

-$

-$

2,50

0,00

0$

2,65

0,00

0$

2,65

0,00

0$

7,80

0,00

0$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

One

Bay

Are

a G

rant

- L

ocal

Mat

ch (C

ycle

2)

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Pro

ject

OB

AG

fun

ding

am

ount

is b

ased

on

the

prio

r cy

cle.

Thi

s P

rop

K c

ateg

ory

(EP

44)

is a

ntic

ipat

ed to

pro

vide

app

roxi

mat

ely

50%

of

the

requ

ired

mat

ch. W

hen

proj

ects

are

id

entif

ied,

pro

ject

s w

ill n

eed

to m

eet O

BA

G m

atch

ing

requ

irem

ents

per

the

late

st g

uide

lines

and

cal

l for

pro

ject

s.

Page

2 o

f 2

24


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:




Contracted - Both

Quarter Year Quarter Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 100% In-House 1 2010/11 1 2013/14

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 95% In-House 2 2013/14 4 2013/14

Design Engineering (PS&E) 95% 1 2013/14 4 2013/14



Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 2 2014/15 2 2014/15

End Construction (i.e. Open for Use) 4 2014/15 4 2014/15


Project Close-out

In the past 5 years there have been 9 vehicle-pedestrian collisions in this area. As a result, the City's WalkFirst Report recommends various changes to enhance pedestrian safety in this area.

Construction contract advertisement is scheduled for the end of June 2014 with the Notice-To-Proceed to be issued by fall 2014.

11

This project was originally identified through the SFCTA's Mission-Geneva Neighborhood Transportation Plan. The locations for pilot and permanent work (to be constructed as part of the Department of Public Works' (DPW's) Ocean Avenue Paving project) were developed through multiple meetings with the community (March and June 2013) and Supervisor Avalos' staff.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Cathal Hennessy

(415) 701-4596

[email protected]

The "Persia Triangle" is the area bounded by Mission Street, Ocean Avenue, and Persia Avenue. With support from Supervisor John Avalos and the community, the Planning Department proposes a pilot project to implement several temporary street changes to ensure pedestrian safety in advance of permanent work planned for Fall 2014. As part of the pilot, temporary paint will be applied to multiple intersections to simulate bulb-outs. Permanent construction will convert the temporary pilot locations to concrete bulb-outs. Permanent work also includes traffic signal upgrades, new street light fixtures to improve the lighting and the re-alignment of the Alemany and Ocean intersection. The proposed Prop K project includes the permanent work. This is a carry-forward project from the 2009 5YPP given its orgin in the Mission-Geneva Neighborhood Transportation Plan and the Transportation Authority's prior programming of Lifeline Transportation Program funds to the project. Prop K funds will match the Lifeline funds.

Start Date End Date

EIR

Underway

06/30/14


Comments/Concerns



44

2014/15

Mission Street, Ocean Avenue and Persia Avenue

Project Information


Persia Triangle Improvements


Page 1 of 2

25

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

100,

000

$

-

$

100,

000

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

323,

415

$

-

$

323,

415

$

R/W

Con

stru

ctio

n1,

044,

000

$

20

0,68

5$

843,

315

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

1,46

7,41

5$

200,

685

$

1,

266,

730

$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al14

%86

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Life

line/

Pro

p 1B

Allo

cate

d10

/11

$

100

,000

10

0,00

0$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Life

line/

Pro

p 1B

Allo

cate

d10

/11

$

323

,415

32

3,41

5$

Con

stru

ctio

nL

ifelin

e/P

rop

1BA

lloca

ted

10/1

1 $

3

79,3

19

379,

319

$

Con

stru

ctio

nP

rop

KP

lann

ed14

/15

$

200

,685

20

0,68

5$

Con

stru

ctio

nSF

MT

A R

even

ue B

ond

Pla

nned

14/1

5 $

4

63,9

96

463,

996

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r$4

23,4

15$1

,044

,000

-$

-

$

-$

-

$

1,46

7,41

5$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Per

sia

Tri

angl

e Im

prov

emen

ts

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

26


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:




Contracted - Both


Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 1 2014/15 2 2015/16








Project Close-out



44

2014/15

Lombard Street from Lyon to Van Ness

Project Information


Lombard Street Pedestrian and Transit Treatments [NTIP]


2

This project would build on public outreach conducted by the Office of Economic and Workforce Development on the Lombard corridor as part of the Invest in Neighborhoods Initiative. Strong community engagement is a focus of the Transportation Authority's Neighborhood Transportation Planning Program, which would fund the subject project.


John Thomas

415-558-4498

[email protected]

Informed by several meetings with Commissioner Farrell's office, the SFMTA has proposed a series of treatments to improve pedestrian safety and transit efficiency along Lombard St based on analysis completed for the Walkfirst Investment Strategy and the Transit Effectiveness Project. This project would fund conceptual design of these treatments so they can be integrated with a planned Caltrans re-paving of the corridor in FY 17, which would minimize construction impacts on the community and potential result in cost efficiencies. Project elements include but are not limited to landscaping, corner and bus bulbs, daylighting and re-timing signals.

Start Date End Date

TBD


Comments/Concerns

Lombard Street from Richardson to Buchanan is included in San Francisco’s list of High Injury Corridors. It has also been targeted by the Supervisor's office as a priority corridor for pedestrian and streetscape improvements, and is one of the corridors to be improved as part of the SFMTA's Transit Effectiveness Project.

Cost, schedule and funding information for future phases will be a deliverable of the planning/conceptual engineering effort.

Page 1 of 2

27

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

100,

000

$

10

0,00

0$

-$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n-

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

100,

000

$

10

0,00

0$

-$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al10

0%0%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pri

or14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

14/1

590

,000

$

10

,000

$

10

0,00

0$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r90

,000

$

10

,000

$

-

$

-$

-

$

100,

000

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Lom

bard

Str

eet P

edes

tria

n an

d T

rans

it T

reat

men

ts [N

TIP

]

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

28


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:




Contracted - Both










Project Close-out



44

2014/15

Western Addition neighborhood, approximately bounded by Van Ness Avenue, Geary Boulevard, Divisadero Street, and Fulton Street.

Project Information


Western Addition Neighborhood Transportation Plan


5, 6

This planning effort will include a significant community outreach component to engage residents in identifying transportation needs in the neighborhood, including safety issues, and potential solutions.

San Francisco County Transportation Authority

Colin Dentel-Post

415-522-4836

[email protected]

This neighborhood-scale planning effort is intended to identify key transportation needs in the Western Addition; identify and evaluate potential solutions, particularly those that can be implemented in the near term; and recommend next steps to implement those solutions. Potential project concepts for development could include pedestrian improvements along Geary Boulevard or traffic calming along Webster Street or Turk Street. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) has identified Communities of Concern (CoCs) throughout the nine county Bay Area region. MTC's Community Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) grants, one of which will fund the subject project, are intended to support community-based planning in the CoCs to help build a pipeline of projects that can compete for MTC and other funds. The objectives of MTC's CBTP grant program, align closely with the Transportation Authority's Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP), which will provide the Prop K funds to match the MTC grant.

Start Date End Date

N/A


Comments/Concerns

The Western Addition is a traditionally underserved Community of Concern with a high concentration of low-income housing and, as a historic center of San Francisco's African-American community, a large population of minority residents. As a legacy of urban renewal projects in the 20th century, the neighborhood has a number of wide streets, such as Geary Boulevard and Webster Street, and one-way streets, including Turk Street, that encourage high vehicle speeds and are detrimental to pedestrian safety.

Page 1 of 2

29

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

300,

000

$

240,

000

$

60,0

00$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

-

$

-$

R/W

-$

-

$

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n-

$

-$

-

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

-

$

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

300,

000

$

240,

000

$

60,0

00$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al80

%20

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

14/

1515

/16

16/

1717

/18

18/

19T

otal

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

(30%

)P

rop

KP

lann

ed14

/15

120,

000

$

120,

000

$

240,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

(30%

)M

TC

-CB

TP

Pro

gram

med

14/1

560

,000

$

60

,000

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r18

0,00

0$

12

0,00

0$

-

$

-$

-

$

300,

000

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Wes

tern

Add

ition

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n P

lan

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

30


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:




Contracted - Both










Project Close-out



44

2014/15

TBD

Project Information


Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program Planning Placeholder


Citywide (one in each supervisorial district)

NTIP planning program is specifically designed to be community-based, with priority given to plans that address needs in communities of concern.TBD

The NTIP program came out of the San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment that identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives. (See Purpose and Need below.) The NTIP has two components: a planning component to fund community-based planning efforts in each Supervisorial district ($100,000 for each district over the next 5 years); and a capital component to provide local matching funds for two neighborhood-scale projects in each district in the next five years. Examples of NTIP planning projects include: district-wide needs and prioritization processes (e.g. District 4 Sunset Blueprint); traditional neighborhood transportation plan development (e.g. Tenderloin-Little Saigon Neighborhood Transportation Plan, Mission District Streetscape Plan); corridor plans (e.g. Leland Avenue Street Design Project, McLaren Park Needs Assessment/Mansell Corridor Improvements, and Columbus Avenue Neighborhood Transportation Study); and project-level plans or smaller efforts (e.g. Bayview Shuttle Project, community mini-grants, safety project concepts development, and transportation demand management planning including neighborhood parking analysis). Transportation Authority staff will develop NTIP planning guidelines in consultation with project sponsors, for anticipated approval by the Transportation Authority Board in Fall 2014.

Start Date End Date


Comments/Concerns

The San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives, and concluded that meeting these transportation needs is an important way to improve mobility in neighborhoods and to address socioeconomic and geographic disparities in San Francisco. As a result of this finding and in response to public and Board input, the Transportation Authority developed the NTIP.

This is a placeholder. Schedule will be determined once a specific NTIP plan proposal is developed.

Page 1 of 2

31

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

1,10

0,00

0$

1,

100,

000

$

-$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

-

$

-$

R/W

-$

-

$

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n-

$

-$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

-

$

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

1,10

0,00

0$

1,

100,

000

$

-$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al10

0%0%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

14/1

530

0,00

0$

300,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

15/1

660

0,00

0$

600,

000

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r-

$

300,

000

$

60

0,00

0$

-$

-

$

-$

90

0,00

0$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Im

prov

emen

t Pro

gram

Pla

nnin

g P

lace

hold

er

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

The

NT

IP in

clud

es $

100,

000

for

each

sup

ervi

soria

l dis

tric

t ove

r th

e ne

xt 5

yea

rs to

und

erta

ke n

eigh

borh

ood-

scal

e, c

omm

unity

bas

ed p

lann

ing

effo

rts.

As

part

of

the

5YP

P u

pdat

e, s

ome

spec

ific

NT

IP P

lann

ing

proj

ects

are

kno

wn.

The

y ar

e lis

ted

as s

epar

ate

proj

ects

. W

hen

NT

IP p

lann

ing

proj

ects

are

iden

tifie

d, th

ey a

re e

xpec

ted

to in

clud

e ap

prop

riate

leve

ragi

ng.

Page

2 o

f 2

32


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:

Status:




Contracted - Both


Planning/Conceptual Engineering (30%) 1 2014/15 4 2018/19








Project Close-out



44

2014/15

TBD

Project Information


Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program Pre-Development/Program Support


TBD

NTIP projects are intended to funds projects that have been identified through community-based transportation planning efforts.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA)

The NTIP program came out of the San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment that identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives. (See Purpose and Need below.) The NTIP has two components: a planning component to fund community-based planning efforts in each Supervisorial district; and a capital component to provide local matching funds for two neighborhood-scale projects in each district in the next five years. Examples of project types include colorizing dedicated transit lanes, transit signal priority, and transit only lane enforcement cameras. Prop K funds for the subject project would enable SFMTA and SFCTA staff to support Commissioner's efforts to identify, scope, and develop an implementation approach to proposed NTIP planning and capital projects. NTIP guidelines will be brought to the Board in September 2014.

Start Date End Date

n/a


Comments/Concerns

The San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives, and concluded that meeting these transportation needs is an important way to improve mobility in neighborhoods and to address socioeconomic and geographic disparities in San Francisco. As a result of this finding and in response to public and Board input, the Transportation Authority developed the NTIP.

Page 1 of 2

33

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

-$

-

$

-$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

-

$

-$

R/W

-$

-

$

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n65

0,00

0$

650,

000

$

-

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

-

$

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

650,

000

$

65

0,00

0$

-$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al10

0%0%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

14/1

515

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

15/1

615

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

16/1

715

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

17/1

810

0,00

0$

100,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

18/1

910

0,00

0$

100,

000

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r-

$

150,

000

$

15

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

100,

000

$

100,

000

$

650,

000

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Whe

n pr

ojec

ts a

re id

entif

ied,

pro

ject

s ar

e ex

pect

ed to

incl

ude

appr

opria

te le

vera

ging

.

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Im

prov

emen

t Pro

gram

Pre

-Dev

elop

men

t/P

rogr

am S

uppo

rt

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

Page

2 o

f 2

34


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:




Contracted - Both










Project Close-out



44

2015/16

TBD

Project Information


Planning Grant Match (e.g. Caltrans Planning Grants)


TBD

Projects should include a collaborative planning process with community stakeholders such as residents, business proprietors, transit agencies, human service agencies, neighborhood associations, non-profit or other community-based organizations and faith-based organizations. The purpose of this collaboration is to solicit comments from these stakeholders, review preliminary findings with them, and to utilize their perspective in identifying potential strategies and solutions for addressing transportation issues.

TBD

This placeholder will provide the local match for planning grants that support transit oriented development and fund related improvements for ransit, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Planning grants should help promote the development of a balanced, comprehensive multi-modal transportation system. The implementation of these grants should ultimately lead to the adoption, initiation, and programming of transportation improvements. The Prop K funds can also be used if leveraged by other funds (e.g. private/developer funds, other agency funds). The Transportation Authority will prioritize Prop K local match funds from this placeholder, given weight to factors such as whether the plannign project has limited local match options (will be given higher priority) and whether it would benefit a community of concern.

Start Date End Date


Comments/Concerns

The San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives, and concluded that meeting these transportation needs is an important way to improve mobility in neighborhoods and to address socioeconomic and geographic disparities in San Francisco.


Page 1 of 2

35

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

2,10

0,00

0$

60

0,00

0$

1,50

0,00

0$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n-

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

2,10

0,00

0$

60

0,00

0$

1,50

0,00

0$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al29

%71

%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

Tot

al

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

15/1

615

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

16/1

715

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

17/1

815

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

18/1

915

0,00

0$

150,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

TB

DP

lann

edF

Y15

/16-

18/1

937

5,00

0$

375,

000

$

37

5,00

0$

375,

000

$

1,

500,

000

$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r-

$

-$

525,

000

$

52

5,00

0$

52

5,00

0$

52

5,00

0$

2,

100,

000

$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

Mat

ch (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g G

rant

s)

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

App

ropr

iate

leve

ragi

ng w

ill b

e ex

pect

ed w

hen

allo

catio

n re

ques

ts a

re s

ubm

itted

. A

side

fro

m C

altr

ans

Pla

nnin

g gr

ants

ther

e ar

e ot

her

sour

ces

of f

undi

ng th

at c

ould

leve

rage

the

prop

osed

P

rop

K f

unds

suc

h as

Com

mun

ity B

ased

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Pla

nnin

g gr

ants

fro

m th

e M

etro

polit

an T

rans

port

atio

n C

omm

issi

on a

nd lo

cal a

genc

y re

venu

es.

Page

2 o

f 2

36


Category:

Subcategory:


EP Line (Primary):



Project Name:

Project Location:



Purpose and Need:



Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Type:




Contracted - Both




44

2016/17

TBD

Project Information


Priority Development Area Planning Match


TBD

Prioritization criteria for PDA planning programs include plans for outreach and community support.

TBD

This placeholder will provide local match for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC's) Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning program to support comprehensive planning in PDAs that will result in intensified land uses around public transit hubs and corridors. PDA Planning funds are mainly distributed in two ways:- Under the regionwide competitive Regional PDA Planning program, MTC prioritizes projects based on the following criteria: location within Community of Concerns, project impact (e.g. potential to increase housing, employment, transit ridership, and multi-modal transportation options), existing policies demonstrating commitment to increase housing and transportation policies, planning process to address the planning elements, and local commitment and capacity for implementation. For more information, please visit MTC's PDA Planning page <http://www.mtc.ca.gov/planning/smart_growth/stations>.- Local PDA Planning funds are administered by the Planning Department in San Francisco. Projects are prioritized based on similar criteria to the OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) program (see OBAG Local Match Project Information Form), as well as the level of need for additional planning and geographic equity among PDAs. Local PDA Planning funds help prepare candidate projects to become ready for future OBAG and other capital funding; to assess transportation needs in PDAs (or citywide needs that impact PDAs); and for land use planning in PDAs.

To be eligible for matching funds form this category, projects must support Transit-Oriented Development and fund related improvements for transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Priority will be given to projects that have no or limited alternate sources of matching funds. Further additional priority will go toward projects that benefit Communities of Concern and that address geographic equity.

Start Date End Date


Key goals of the PDA Planning program are to increase both housing (including affordable housing) and jobs; increase transit ridership; promote multimodal connections; and locate key services and retail within the PDAs. Federal funds for these programs typically require at least 11.47% local match.


Page 1 of 2

37

San

Fra

nci

sco

Cou

nty

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

Au

thor

ity

Pro

pos

itio

n K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfo

rmat

ion

For

m

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Pro

ject

Cos

t E

stim

ate

Ph

ase

Cos

tP

rop

KO

ther

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

4,08

0,00

0$

400,

000

$

3,68

0,00

0$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

R/W

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n-

$

Pro

cure

men

t (e.

g. r

ollin

g st

ock)

-$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

4,08

0,00

0$

400,

000

$

3,68

0,00

0$

Per

cen

t of

Tot

al9.

80%

90.2

0%

Ph

ase

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Fu

nd

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fis

cal Y

ear

Fu

nd

s A

vaila

ble

Pre

viou

s14

/15

15/

1616

/17

17/

1818

/19

19/

20T

otal

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

16/1

720

0,00

0$

20

0,00

0$

40

0,00

0$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Loc

al P

DA

Pla

nned

16/1

72,

380,

000

$

2,

380,

000

$

Pla

nnin

g/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Reg

iona

l PD

AP

lann

ed16

/17

600,

000

$

600,

000

$

1,20

0,00

0$

Pro

p K

Pla

nned

18/1

950

,000

$

50

,000

$

10

0,00

0$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

Tot

al B

y F

isca

l Yea

r-

$

-$

-

$

3,18

0,00

0$

200,

000

$

650,

000

$

50,0

00$

4,08

0,00

0$

Com

men

ts/

Con

cern

s

Prio

rity

Dev

elop

men

t Are

a P

lann

ing

Mat

ch

Fu

nd

ing

Sou

rce

Pro

ject

Exp

end

itu

res

(Cas

h F

low

) B

y F

isca

l Yea

r E

nte

r C

ash

Flo

w H

ere

PD

A f

undi

ng a

mou

nts

are

base

d on

the

prio

r cy

cle.

Whe

n pr

ojec

ts a

re id

entif

ied,

pro

ject

s w

ill n

eed

to m

eet r

espe

ctiv

e m

atch

ing

requ

irem

ents

per

the

late

st g

uide

lines

and

cal

l for

pr

ojec

ts. A

bove

leve

ragi

ng is

an

estim

ate

base

d on

info

rmat

ion

curr

ently

ava

ilabl

e.

Page

2 o

f 2

38

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Any

E

li gib

leL

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

Des

ign

Prog

ram

med

$329

,820

$329

,820

Any

E

li gib

leL

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$1

,319

,280

$1,3

19,2

80A

ny

Eli g

ible

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

erD

esig

nPr

ogra

mm

ed$4

00,0

00$4

00,0

00A

ny

Eli g

ible

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

erC

ON

Prog

ram

med

$1,6

00,0

00$1

,600

,000

MT

APe

rsia

Tri

angl

e T

rans

it Im

prov

emen

ts

(Life

line

Mat

ch)

TB

DPr

ogra

mm

ed$2

00,6

85$2

00,6

85

SFC

TA

Lan

d U

se A

lloca

tion

Mod

el U

pdat

ePL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

0,00

0$5

0,00

0SF

CT

AN

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

ning

(e.g

. CB

TP)

PLA

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

0,00

0$5

0,00

0SF

CT

AN

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

ning

(e.g

. CB

TP)

PLA

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

0,00

0$5

0,00

0SF

CT

AN

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

ning

(e.g

. CB

TP)

PLA

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

0,00

0$5

0,00

0

SFC

TA

NT

P Pr

ogra

m -

Eva

luat

ion

/ C

itize

ns

Gui

dePL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$7

5,00

0$7

5,00

0A

ny

Eli g

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Cal

tran

s Pl

anni

ng)

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$54,

076

$54,

076

Any

E

li gib

lePl

anni

ng P

lace

hold

er (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Plan

ning

)PL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

4,07

6$5

4,07

6A

ny

Eli g

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Cal

tran

s Pl

anni

ng)

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$54,

076

$54,

076

Any

E

li gib

lePl

anni

ng P

lace

hold

er (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Plan

ning

)PL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

4,07

6$5

4,07

6

2009

Pro

p K

5Y

PP

- P

rogr

am o

f P

roje

cts

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

/L

and

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

n (

EP

44)

Pro

gram

min

g an

d A

lloca

tion

s T

o-d

ate

Las

t Upd

ate:

Mar

ch 3

0, 2

010

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Pl

anni

ng

Age

ncy

Tot

al

39

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Age

ncy

Tot

al

Any

E

li gib

lePl

anni

ng P

lace

hold

er (e

.g. S

tatio

n A

rea

Plan

)PL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$7

2,20

0$7

2,20

0A

ny

Eli g

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an)

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$72,

200

$72,

200

Any

E

li gib

lePl

anni

ng P

lace

hold

er (e

.g. S

tatio

n A

rea

Plan

)PL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$7

2,20

0$7

2,20

0A

ny

Eli g

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an)

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$72,

200

$72,

200

Any

E

li gib

lePl

anni

ng P

lace

hold

er (e

.g. S

tatio

n A

rea

Plan

)PL

AN

/CE

RPr

ogra

mm

ed$7

2,20

0$7

2,20

0

$272

,885

$5

81,0

96

$1,5

45,5

56

$576

,276

$1

,726

,276

$4

,702

,089

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$272

,885

$5

81,0

96

$1,5

45,5

56

$576

,276

$1

,726

,276

$4

,702

,089

$272

,885

$5

81,0

96

$1,5

45,5

56

$576

,276

$1

,726

,276

$4

,702

,089

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

*

The

200

9 St

rate

gic

Plan

was

am

ende

d on

Mar

ch 3

0, 2

010

thro

ugh

Res

. 10-

52.

Plan

ning

for

TO

D/I

nfill

Sup

port

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

Tot

al U

nal

loca

ted

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

Am

end

ed 2

009

Stra

tegi

c P

lan

*C

umul

ativ

e R

emai

ning

Pro

gram

min

g C

apac

ity

40

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Any

Elig

ible

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

erD

esig

nP

rogr

amm

ed$0

$0

DP

WF

olso

m S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

1C

ON

Allo

cate

d$2

67,0

00$2

67,0

00

DP

WSe

cond

Str

eet S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

Des

ign

Allo

cate

d$3

5,00

0$3

5,00

0

DP

WSe

cond

Str

eet S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

Des

ign

Deo

blig

ated

($31

,800

)($

31,8

00)

DP

WB

road

way

Str

eeet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Pha

se I

IID

esig

nA

lloca

ted

$31,

000

$31,

000

Any

Elig

ible

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er 3,

6, 7

, 8, 1

2,15

CO

NP

rogr

amm

ed$1

,225

$1,2

25

BA

RT

24th

Str

eet/

Mis

sion

BA

RT

Pla

za a

nd P

edes

tria

n

Impr

ovem

ents

3D

esig

nA

lloca

ted

$303

,047

$303

,047

DP

W24

th S

tree

t/M

issi

on B

AR

T P

laza

Bus

-bul

b 6

CO

NA

lloca

ted

$179

,000

$179

,000

DP

WM

arin

a G

reen

Bic

ycle

Tra

il 6

CO

NA

lloca

ted

$113

,625

$113

,625

DP

WB

road

way

Str

eeet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Pha

se I

II 6

CO

NA

lloca

ted

$245

,000

$245

,000

DP

WB

road

way

Str

eeet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Pha

se I

II 6

CO

ND

eobl

igat

ed($

4,62

0)($

4,62

0)

DP

W24

th/M

issi

on B

AR

T S

W P

laza

- 2

4th

Stre

et

Side

wal

k, C

urb,

and

Lan

dsca

ping

7C

ON

Allo

cate

d$2

8,00

0$2

8,00

0

BA

RT

24th

/Mis

sion

BA

RT

SW

Pla

za a

nd P

edes

tria

n

Impr

ovem

ents

8C

ON

Allo

cate

d$1

7,20

3$1

7,20

3

DP

WB

road

way

Str

eeet

scap

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Pha

se I

II -

Supp

lem

enta

l9C

ON

Allo

cate

d$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00

SFM

TA

Mar

ket a

nd H

aigh

t Str

eet T

rans

it an

d P

edes

tria

n

Impr

ovem

ent12

CO

NA

lloca

ted

$209

,000

$209

,000

Any

Elig

ible

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er 13

, 14,

16

Des

ign

Pro

gram

med

$0

$0

Any

Elig

ible

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er18

CO

NP

rogr

amm

ed$1

,277

,941

$1,2

77,9

41

SFM

TA

Cen

tral

Sub

way

Pha

se I

II I

nitia

l Stu

dy18

PLA

NA

lloca

ted

$173

,212

$173

,212

DP

WL

ongf

ello

w E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sch

ool

13E

NV

, D

esig

nA

lloca

ted

$24,

981

$24,

981

2009

Pro

p K

5Y

PP

- P

rogr

am o

f P

roje

cts

Tra

nsp

orta

tion

/L

and

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

n (

EP

44)

Pro

gram

min

g an

d A

lloca

tion

s T

o-d

ate

Las

t Upd

ate:

Mar

ch 2

5, 2

014

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

al

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch

Stat

usA

genc

yP

roje

ct N

ame

Pha

se

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

5 5Y

PP A

ppen

dice

s\EP

44

Tab

: EP

44 5

YPP

03.2

5.14

Page

1 o

f 4

41

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

alSt

atus

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

DP

WE

R T

aylo

r E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sch

ool

13E

NV

, D

esig

nA

lloca

ted

$20,

184

$20,

184

DP

WM

anse

ll C

orri

dor

Impr

ovem

ent 13

, 14

Des

ign

Allo

cate

d$3

30,8

40$3

30,8

40

DP

WSe

cond

Str

eet S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

16E

NV

, D

esig

nA

lloca

ted

$172

,842

$172

,842

SFM

TA

Pers

ia T

rian

gle

Tra

nsit

Impr

ovem

ents

(Life

line

Mat

ch)

TB

DPr

ogra

mm

ed$2

00,6

85$2

00,6

85

SFM

TA

19th

Ave

nue/

M-O

cean

Vie

w P

roje

ct15

PLA

NA

lloca

ted

$306

,000

$306

,000

SFC

TA

Lan

d U

se A

lloca

tion

Mod

el U

pdat

e11P

LA

N/

CE

RP

rogr

amm

ed$0

$0

SFC

TA

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Pl

anni

ng (e

.g. C

BT

P) 4

PL

AN

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

SFC

TA

Bay

view

Hun

ters

Poi

nt M

obili

ty S

olut

ions

Stu

dyP

LA

NA

lloca

ted

$20,

000

$20,

000

SFC

TA

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Pl

anni

ng (e

.g. C

BT

P) 4,

11

PL

AN

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

SFC

TA

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Pl

anni

ng (e

.g. C

BT

P) 11

PL

AN

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

SFC

TA

NT

P Pr

ogra

m -

Eva

luat

ion

/ C

itize

ns G

uide

11P

LA

N/

CE

RP

rogr

amm

ed$0

$0

SFC

TA

Bro

adw

ay C

hina

tow

n N

eigh

borh

ood

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Pla

n11P

LA

N/

CE

RA

ppro

pria

ted

$209

,174

$209

,174

SFC

TA

Ces

ar C

have

z E

ast C

omm

unity

Des

ign

Pla

n2P

LA

N/

CE

RA

ppro

pria

ted

$29,

559

$29,

559

SFC

TA

Ces

ar C

have

z E

ast C

omm

unity

Des

ign

Pla

n2P

LA

N/

CE

RD

eobl

igat

ed($

24,3

97)

($24

,397

)

Plan

ning

C

esar

Cha

vez

Eas

t Com

mun

ity D

esig

n P

lan2

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Allo

cate

d$2

2,72

9$2

2,72

9

SFC

TA

19th

Ave

Tra

nsit

Cor

rido

r In

vest

men

t Stu

dy 4

PLA

NA

lloca

ted

$126

,827

$126

,827

SFC

TA

19th

Ave

Tra

nsit

Cor

rido

r In

vest

men

t Stu

dyP

LA

ND

eobl

igat

ed($

25,4

27)

($25

,427

)

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Cal

tran

s Pl

anni

ng)

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Cal

tran

s Pl

anni

ng)11

, 17

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$4,2

11$4

,211

PC

JPB

Cal

trai

n N

orth

Ter

min

al S

tudy

17P

LA

N/

CE

RA

lloca

ted

$22,

940

$22,

940

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Cal

tran

s Pl

anni

ng)

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$54,

076

$54,

076

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an)1,

5, 1

0P

LA

N/

CE

RP

rogr

amm

ed$0

$0

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an) 10

, 15

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

SFC

TA

Bal

boa

Park

Sta

tion

Are

a C

ircu

latio

n St

udy

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Allo

cate

d$6

5,60

0$6

5,60

0

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Pl

anni

ng

Plan

ning

for

TO

D/I

nfill

Sup

port

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

5 5Y

PP A

ppen

dice

s\EP

44

Tab

: EP

44 5

YPP

03.2

5.14

Page

2 o

f 4

42

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

alSt

atus

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an)15

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an)15

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

SFC

TA

Bal

boa

Park

Sta

tion

Are

a C

ircu

latio

n St

udy

10P

LA

N/

CE

RA

ppro

pria

ted

$59,

400

$59,

400

Any

Elig

ible

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an)15

PL

AN

/ C

ER

Pro

gram

med

$0$0

$200

,685

$3

49,0

91

$1,0

04,2

77

$199

,414

$2

,860

,590

$4

,614

,057

$0

$405

,288

$1

,033

,099

$1

95,2

03

$1,5

28,5

73

$3,1

62,1

63

$0

($56

,197

)($

30,0

47)

$0

$0

($86

,244

)$2

00,6

85

$0

$1,2

25

$4,2

11

$1,3

32,0

17

$1,5

38,1

38

$272

,885

$5

81,0

96

$1,5

45,5

56

$576

,276

$1

,726

,276

$4

,702

,089

$3

8 $3

8 $7

2,23

8 $3

04,2

43

$845

,522

$1

,222

,384

$8

8,07

0 $8

8,07

0 *

The

200

9 St

rate

gic

Plan

was

am

ende

d on

Mar

ch 3

0, 2

010

thro

ugh

Res

. 10-

52.

FO

OT

NO

TE

S:

1

9th

Ave

nue

Tra

nsit

Cor

rido

r In

vest

men

t Stu

dy: A

dded

new

pro

ject

.

Fisc

al Y

ear

2011

/12

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Pl

anni

ng (e

.g. C

BT

P):

Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

50,0

00 to

$7,

249.

Cu

mu

lati

ve R

emai

nin

g P

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acit

y

** "

Deo

blig

ated

fro

m p

rior

5Y

PP

cyc

les"

incl

udes

deo

blig

atio

ns f

rom

allo

catio

ns a

ppro

ved

prio

r to

the

curr

ent 5

YP

P p

erio

d, e

xclu

ding

deo

blig

atio

ns in

corp

orat

ed in

the

Dec

embe

r 31

, 201

2.

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

an

d P

end

ing

in 5

YP

PT

otal

Deo

blig

ated

in 5

YP

PT

otal

Un

allo

cate

d in

5Y

PP

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

Am

end

ed 2

009

Stra

tegi

c P

lan

*D

eob

ligat

ed f

rom

Pri

or 5

YP

P C

ycle

s **

Pro

gram

med

Boa

rd A

ppro

ved

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

1 5Y

PP

Am

endm

ent t

o fu

lly f

und

cons

truc

tion

of th

e F

olso

m S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

(Res

. 11-

33, 1

2.14

.201

0)

FY

09/

10 P

lann

ing

Plac

ehol

der

decr

ease

d fr

om $

72,2

00 to

$69

,020

. Fu

nds

($3,

180)

red

irec

ted

to F

olso

m S

tree

tsca

pe I

mpr

ovem

ents

.2 C

esar

Cha

vez

Eas

t Com

mun

ity D

esig

n Pl

an: O

n Se

ptem

ber

28, 2

010,

thro

ugh

Res

olut

ion

11-1

3, th

e A

utho

rity

Boa

rd a

lloca

ted

up to

$54

,076

for

this

pro

ject

. Su

bseq

uent

ly, t

hat a

lloca

tion

was

low

ered

to

$52,

288

and

split

bet

wee

n an

allo

catio

n to

the

Plan

ning

Dep

artm

ent (

$22,

729)

and

an a

ppro

pria

tion

to th

e A

utho

rity

($29

,559

). I

nfor

mat

ion

on th

is a

ctio

n is

ava

ilabl

e in

MO

A#

10/

11 -

11.

3 Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er w

as r

educ

ed b

y $3

03,0

47 to

fun

d th

e B

AR

T 2

4th

Stre

et P

laza

and

Ped

estr

ian

Impr

ovem

ents

(Res

. 11-

62, 6

.28.

11)

4 5Y

PP A

men

dmen

t to

add

$126

,827

for

the

19th

Ave

nue

Tra

nsit

Cor

rido

r In

vest

men

t Stu

dy (R

es. 1

2-24

, 11.

15.1

1).

Fi

scal

Yea

r 20

10/1

1 N

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

ning

(e.g

. CB

TP

): R

educ

ed p

rogr

amm

ing

from

$30

,000

to $

0.

5 Pla

nnin

g Pl

aceh

olde

r (e

.g. S

tatio

n A

rea

Plan

) red

uced

in F

Y 2

009/

10 f

rom

$69

,020

to $

3,42

0 to

fun

d B

albo

a Pa

rk S

tatio

n A

rea

Circ

ulat

ion

Stud

y (R

es. 1

2-27

, 12.

13.1

1)6 L

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

(Con

stru

ctio

n) w

as r

educ

ed f

rom

$83

7,23

3 to

$47

8,60

8 to

fun

d 3

DP

W p

roje

cts:

24t

h St

reet

/Mis

sion

BA

RT

Pla

za B

us-b

ulb

(Res

. 12-

28, 1

2.13

.201

1), a

nd M

arin

a G

reen

B

icyc

le T

rail

and

Bro

adw

ay S

tree

etsc

ape

Impr

ovem

ents

- P

hase

III

(Res

. 12-

60, 0

4.24

.201

2).

7 Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er (C

onst

ruct

ion)

was

red

uced

fro

m $

478,

608

to $

450,

608

to f

und

DP

W's

24th

/Mis

sion

BA

RT

SW

Pla

za -

24th

Str

eet S

idew

alk,

Cur

b, a

nd L

ands

capi

ng p

roje

ct (R

es. 1

3-12

, 09

.25.

2012

).

8 Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er (C

onst

ruct

ion)

was

red

uced

fro

m $

450,

608

to $

433,

405

to f

und

BA

RT

's 24

th/M

issi

on B

AR

T P

laza

and

Ped

estr

ian

Impr

ovem

ents

pro

ject

(Res

. 13-

30, 0

1.29

.201

3).

Pend

ing

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

9 Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er (C

onst

ruct

ion)

was

red

uced

fro

m $

433,

405

to $

283,

405

to p

rovi

de s

uppl

emen

tal f

unds

for

DP

W's

Bro

adw

ay S

tree

etsc

ape

Impr

ovem

ents

- P

hase

III

pro

ject

(Res

. 13-

43,

03.2

6.20

13).

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

5 5Y

PP A

ppen

dice

s\EP

44

Tab

: EP

44 5

YPP

03.2

5.14

Page

3 o

f 4

43

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Fis

cal Y

ear

Tot

alSt

atus

Age

ncy

Pro

ject

Nam

eP

hase

B

road

way

Chi

nato

wn

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Pl

an: A

dded

new

pro

ject

.

F

isca

l Yea

r 20

11/1

2 N

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

ning

(e.g

. CB

TP

): R

educ

ed p

rogr

amm

ing

from

$50

,000

to $

0.

Lan

d U

se A

lloca

tion

Mod

el U

pdat

e: R

educ

ed p

rogr

amm

ing

from

$50

,000

to $

0.

F

isca

l Yea

r 20

12/1

3 Pl

anni

ng P

lace

hold

er (e

.g. C

altr

ans

Plan

ning

): R

educ

ed p

rogr

amm

ing

from

$54

,076

to $

27,1

51.

10 P

lann

ing

Plac

ehol

der

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an) r

educ

ed in

FY

200

9/10

fro

m $

3,42

0 to

$0

and

in F

Y 2

010/

11 f

rom

$72

,200

to $

16,2

20 to

fun

d B

albo

a Pa

rk S

tatio

n A

rea

Cir

cula

tion

Stud

y (R

es. 1

4-05

, 07

.23.

13)

11 5

YPP

Am

endm

ent t

o ad

d $2

09,1

74 f

or th

e B

road

way

Chi

nato

wn

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d T

rans

port

atio

n Pl

an (R

es. 1

4-05

, 07.

23.1

3).

Fi

scal

Yea

r 20

10/1

1 N

eigh

borh

ood

Plan

ning

(e.g

. CB

TP

): R

educ

ed p

rogr

amm

ing

from

$7,

249

to $

0.

N

TP

Prog

ram

- E

valu

atio

n /

Citi

zens

Gui

de: R

educ

ed p

rogr

amm

ing

from

$75

,000

to $

0.

12 L

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

(Con

stru

ctio

n) w

as r

educ

ed f

rom

$28

3,40

5 to

$74

,405

to p

rovi

de lo

cal m

atch

fun

ds f

or th

e co

nstr

uctio

n of

SF

MT

A's

Mar

ket a

nd H

aigh

t Str

eet T

rans

it an

d P

edes

tria

n Im

prov

emen

t pro

ject

(R

es. 1

4-20

, 09.

24.2

013)

.13

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er (D

esig

n) w

as r

educ

ed f

rom

$40

0,00

0 to

$35

4,83

5 to

pro

vide

loca

l mat

ch f

unds

for

the

envi

ronm

enta

l stu

dies

and

des

ign

phas

es o

f D

PW

's L

ongf

ello

w E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Sa

fe R

oute

s to

Sch

ool p

roje

ct ($

24,9

81) a

nd E

R T

aylo

r E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Sch

ool p

roje

ct ($

20,1

84).

(Res

. 14-

29, 1

0.22

.201

3).

14 L

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

(Des

ign)

was

red

uced

fro

m $

354,

835

to $

23,9

95 to

pro

vide

loca

l mat

ch f

unds

for

the

desi

gn p

hase

of

SFM

TA

's M

anse

ll C

orri

dor

Impr

ovem

ent (

$330

,840

) (R

es. 1

4-34

, 11

.26.

2013

).15

5YPP

Am

endm

ent t

o ad

d $3

06,0

00 f

or th

e 19

th A

venu

e/M

-Oce

an V

iew

Pro

ject

(Res

. 14-

63, 0

3.25

.14)

.

1

9th

Ave

nue/

M-O

cean

Vie

w P

roje

ct: A

dded

new

pro

ject

.

F

isca

l Yea

r 20

11/1

2 L

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

: Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

74,4

05 to

$1,

225.

Fis

cal Y

ear

2010

/11

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an):

Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

16,2

20 to

$0.

Fis

cal Y

ear

2011

/12

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an):

Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

72,2

00 to

$0.

Fis

cal Y

ear

2012

/13

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an):

Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

72,2

00 to

$0.

Fis

cal Y

ear

2013

/14

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

(e.g

. Sta

tion

Are

a Pl

an):

Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

72,2

00 to

$0.

18 5Y

PP A

men

dmen

t to

add

$173

,212

for

the

Cen

tral

Sub

way

Pha

se I

II -

Ini

tial S

tudy

(Res

. 14-

63, 0

3.25

.14)

.

C

entr

al S

ubw

ay P

hase

III

- I

nitia

l Stu

dy: A

dded

new

pro

ject

.

F

isca

l Yea

r 20

13/1

4 L

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

: Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

1,45

1,15

3 to

$1,

277,

941.

16 L

ocal

Cap

ital M

atch

Pla

ceho

lder

(Des

ign)

was

red

uced

fro

m $

23,9

95 to

$0,

and

Loc

al C

apita

l Mat

ch P

lace

hold

er (C

onst

ruct

ion)

was

red

uced

fro

m $

1.6

mill

ion

to $

1,45

1,15

3 to

pro

vide

loca

l mat

ch f

unds

fo

r th

e en

viro

nmen

tal s

tudi

es a

nd d

esig

n ph

ases

of

DP

W's

Seco

nd S

tree

t Im

prov

emen

t ($1

72,8

42) (

Res

. 14-

63, 0

3.25

.14)

.17

5YPP

Am

endm

ent t

o ad

d $2

2,94

0 fo

r th

e C

altr

ain

Nor

th T

erm

inal

Stu

dy (R

es.1

4-63

, 03.

25.1

4).

Cal

trai

n N

orth

Ter

min

al S

tudy

: Add

ed n

ew p

roje

ct.

Fis

cal Y

ear

2012

/13

Plan

ning

Pla

ceho

lder

: Red

uced

pro

gram

min

g fr

om $

27,1

51 to

$4,

211.

P:\P

rop

K\SP

-5YP

P\20

13 U

pdat

e\3

5YPP

s\EP

44\

5 5Y

PP A

ppen

dice

s\EP

44

Tab

: EP

44 5

YPP

03.2

5.14

Page

4 o

f 4

44

1 plans and programs committee july 15, 2014 · and land use coordination category, the prop k...

Documents