1202-13

Upload: el-arbi-abdellaoui-alaoui

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 1202-13

    1/4

    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 10, NO. 2, JUNE 2012 163

    AbstractTo meet the actual requirement of

    automatic monitoring of the shortwave signals under

    wide band ranges, a technique for automatic recognition

    is studied in this paper. And basing upon the spectrum

    and modulation characters of amplitude modulation

    (AM) signals, an automatic recognition scheme for AM

    signals is proposed. The proposed scheme is achieved by

    a joint judgment with four different characteristic

    parameters. Experiment results indicate that the

    proposed scheme can effectively recognize AM signals in

    practice.

    Index TermsAmplitude modulation, automatic

    recognition, characteristic parameters, shortwave radio.

    1. IntroductionNowadays a lot of studies have been devoted to the

    algorithms for modulation recognition of analog signals. In

    [1] to [8], a series of parameters based on the instantaneousamplitude and phase were proposed to identify the different

    modulation types: amplitude modulation (AM), single side

    band (SSB), frequency modulation (FM), double side

    band (DSB), and so on. However, the situation in the

    modulation recognition algorithms mentioned above and

    that in the actual application are different. Furthermore,

    digital signals are usually accrued in the shortwave bands.

    Therefore, a lot of tasks should be done to this field.

    A new AM signal recognition scheme is proposed in

    this paper. The scheme is based on the spectrum and

    modulation characters of AM signals. In this way, a fast

    recognition of AM signals can be obtained by characteristic

    parameters calculation. Experimental results show that the

    proposed scheme can effectively improve the performance

    of automatic AM sorting work.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2

    demonstrates a theoretical analysis for AM signal

    Manuscript received May 31, 2012; revised June 11, 2011; presented at

    2012 2nd International Conference on Signal, Image Processing and

    Applications, Hong Kong, August 34, 2012.

    X.-F. Zhang, L. Chang, P.-M. Ren, and R. Liu are with State Radio

    Monitoring Center, Beijing 100027, China (e-mail: [email protected];

    [email protected]; [email protected];[email protected]).Digital Object Identifier: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-862X.2012.02.013

    identification and an AM signal recognition scheme based

    on characteristic parameters is proposed in this section. In

    Section 3, simulation results and analysis are presented.

    Finally, Section 4 concludes this paper.

    2. Algorithm for AM signalIdentification

    In this section, the theoretical analysis on AM

    recognition algorithms is illustrated in detail. To introduce

    recognition algorithms, four characteristic parameters are

    taken into consideration. Finally, a new scheme for AM

    signal sorting is proposed.

    2.1 Power Spectrum Symmetry

    Considering that some signals show a certain sort of

    symmetry on spectrum distribution at the range of its 3 dB

    bandwidth, a power spectrum symmetry equation[5] can be

    defined as

    1L U

    L U

    P PS

    P P

    =

    +

    (1)

    where PL and PU are the upper and lower bands of power

    spectrum, which are symmetrical about the center

    frequency. Since these parameters can be used to measure

    the symmetrical degree of the overall spectrum,

    symmetrical signals can be easily distinguished from

    unsymmetrical signals by S1. The value of S1 is inversely

    proportional to symmetry.

    It is known that signals, like AM, Morse, and single

    carrier, do show good symmetry. However, sometimes thehighest amplitude of phase shift keying (PSK) and

    frequence shift keying (FSK) maybe just located in the

    center of the whole spectrum. Taking everything mentioned

    above into account, the threshold is usually set around 0.1

    to 0.2.

    2.2 Maximum Difference Based on the Normalized

    Power Spectrum Symmetry

    In comparison with the parameters S1, the parameterS2

    is used to further describe the symmetry of spectrum

    distribution, which can be recognized as a stricter parameter.

    The mathematical formulation of this different symmetryrelationship is described by

    Automatic Recognition Algorithm of AM Signals

    Based on Spectrum and Modulation CharactersXiao-Fei Zhang, Liang Chang, Pei-Ming Ren, and Rong Liu

  • 7/28/2019 1202-13

    2/4

    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 10, NO. 2, JUNE 2012164

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    Fig. 1. Instantaneous amplitude of various signals after filtering:

    (a) CW signal, (b) MORSE signal, and (c) AM signal.

    ( ) ( ){ }2 maxS S n k S n k = + (2)

    where S(n) is the maximum value of the spectrum center,

    S(n+k) and S(nk) (k=1, 2, , n1) are respectively

    represent the left amplitude and right amplitude.

    The basic ideal of parameter S2 is similar to that of

    parameterS1. It extracts the largest amplitude differences of

    the normalized power spectrum symmetry in order to avoid

    the presence of outliers. By this way, the symmetrical

    signals are easily sorted.

    In the ideal case, the parameter S2 can strictlydistinguish AM, Morse, and carrier waves (CW) from other

    signals. Additionally, the computational complexity of

    parameterS2 is very high. However, both the reliability and

    the computational complexity can be greatly improved by a

    joint judgment with the parameterS1.

    Usually, if the value of parameterS1 is above the given

    threshold, it can be judged that the signal is none of AM,

    Morse, and CW. On the contrary, we need the parameterS2

    for further judgment. Once the value of parameterS2 is less

    than the set threshold, it is sure that the filtered signals are

    one of these three signals.

    2.3 Statistics based on Instantaneous Amplitude

    Distribution

    After filtering signals by parameters S1 and S2, the

    remaining signals may be one of AM, Morse, and CW.

    Another parameter S3 is used to distinguish Morse from

    AM and CW signals. The Morse signal is a turn-off signal

    while the AM and CW signals are constant signals, so thedistinction can be caused by the different forms of

    amplitude distribution.

    There is a pretreatment in the experiment. Since the

    bandwidth of Morse signal is very narrow, it is filtered by

    adopting a very narrow band-pass filter to minimize the

    impact of noise. The bandwidth herein is set to 20Hz. After

    filtering, the instantaneous amplitude of different signals

    are shown as Fig. 1.

    It can be seen from Fig. 1 that the CW signal is

    basically turned to be a constant envelope signal after

    filtering. On the contrary, the envelope of the AM signal is

    not constant and it changes slowly. At the same time, Morsesignal shows an apparent turn-off feature. So the three

    signals can be distinguished by different amplitude

    distributions.

    The Morse signal can be separated from AM and CW

    signals by computing amplitude distribution statistics. In

    this experiment, the normalized amplitude is divided intoM

    intervals, and the total amplitude distribution number in

    each interval can be denoted as N1, N2, , NM. For the

    Morse signal, it is in the off state for nearly half of the

    time. So the number ofN1, which belongs to the lowest

    value, should be the largest. But there is no such feature for

    AM and CW signals. Therefore, the Morse signal can beeasily identified by counting whether the interval with the

    largest number of points corresponds to the lowest

    amplitude interval, that is

    ( ){ }3 argmax iS n N= (3)

    where n is the number of points whose corresponding

    amplitudes are in the interval Ni, the function arg max{}

    means the value of i when n gets the maximum value. So,

    when S3=1, the signal is surly to be Morse, otherwise it may

    be AM or CW signals alternatively.

    2.4 Constant Envelope Feature ParameterFor AM and CW signals, we can distinguish them by

    2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

    x 104

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.90.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    0

    2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5

    t(s104)

    Normalizedamplitude

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    x 104

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    Normalizedamplitude

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    t(s104)

    1.0

    0.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    0

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12

    x 104

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    11.0

    0.9

    0.80.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    00 2 4 6 8 10 12

    t(s104)

    Normalizedamplitude

  • 7/28/2019 1202-13

    3/4

    ZHANG et al.: Automatic Recognition Algorithm of AM Signals based on Spectrum and Modulation Characters 165

    judging whether it is a constant envelope signal. Setting a

    constant envelope signal as {Sa(k)}, the parameterS4 can be

    defined as

    ( ){ }4 Var aS S k= (4)

    where Var{} means the variance operator.

    The threshold is set to be 0.1. If S4 is larger than the

    threshold, the signal modulation can be judged as AM.

    According to the aforementioned analysis, this paper

    proposes an AM signal recognition scheme based on

    characteristic parameters. Fig. 2 illustrates the flow of the

    proposed scheme. It is worth noting that this is one possible

    scheme, we need to adopt specific process according to the

    characteristics of practical signals. For example, we can

    extend the processing time to make a repetitive judgment to

    improve the reliability.

    3. Simulation ResultsIn this section, 22 signals are tested in the experiment.

    The modulation type of these signals includes 8-channel

    quaternary phase shift keying (QPSK), CW, upper sideband

    (USB), FSK, AM, SSB, and Morse. As the signal-to-noise

    ratio (SNR) of the acquired signals is relatively high, we

    can add noise in order to access each parameter. The

    thresholds (T) of parameters 1, 2, and 4 are set to 0.05, 0.2,

    and 0.1, respectively.

    As is shown in Table 1, the SNR is set to 0 dB, 5dB

    and 10dB, respectively. Then we can obtain the number of

    each signal with different SNR. Meanwhile, for each SNR,

    we will get two statistics: one with the threshold T, the

    other with the threshold =T =T =T =T =T =T T =T >T =T >T

    AM 3 0 3 0 3 0 3

    CW 2 0 2 0 2 0 2

    MORSE 2 2 0 2 0 2 0

    Table 4: Judgment result ofS4

    SNR 0dB 5dB 10dB

    TYPE No. >=T =T =T Threshold 1

    Threshold 2 >Threshold 2

    >Threshold 4>Threshold 4

    ParameterS1

    ParameterS2

    ParameterS3 ParameterS4

    Thre-

    shold 1

  • 7/28/2019 1202-13

    4/4

    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 10, NO. 2, JUNE 2012166

    [3] N Alyaoui, H. B. Hnia, A. Kachouri, and M. Samet, The

    modulation recognition approaches for software radio, in

    Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Signals, Circuits and Systems,

    Monastir, 2008, pp. 15.

    [4] H.-Z. Guo, Realization for key algorithm of

    communication signal recognition system, M.S. thesis,

    Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2010 (in Chinese).

    [5] AKNandi and EEAzzouz, Algorithms for automatic

    modulation recognition of communication signals, IEEE

    Trans. on Communications, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 431436,

    1998.

    [6] R.-H. Zhang, Automatic recognition of communication

    signal modulation, M.S. thesis, Hebei University, Wuhan,China, 2009 (in Chinese).

    [7] S.-Y. Peng, D.-Q. Kong, and D. Liu. Research of

    Modulation identification algorithm, Machinery &

    Electronics, no. 17, pp. 8586, Jan. 2010.

    [8] H.-P Tao, Research of Communication signal modulation

    format identification, M.S. thesis, Harbin Engineering

    University, Harbin, China, 2005 (in Chinese).

    Xiao-Fei Zhang was born in Henan Province,

    China in 1978. He received the B.S. degree and

    M.S degree from the Beijing University of

    Technology in 2000 and 2006, respectively,

    both in electrical engineering. He is currenly

    working with the State Radio Monitoring

    Center as a senior engineer. His research

    interests include VHF/UHF monitoring and

    interference location technologies.

    Liang Chang was born in Beijing, China in

    1981. He received the B.S. degree and the

    Ph.D. degree from Tsinghua University in

    2003 and 2008, respectively, both in electrical

    engineering. He is currenly working with the

    State Radio Monitoring Center as a seniorengineer. His research interests include signal

    processing in spectrum monitoring and

    satellite monitoring thechnologies.

    Pei-Ming Ren was born in Shanxi Province,

    China in 1985. He received the B.S. degree

    and M.S. degree from the Communication

    University of China (CUC), Beijing in 2009

    and 2011, respectively. He is currenly

    working with the State Radio Monitoring

    Center as an assistant engineer. His researchinterests include spectrum monitoring, signal

    processing, and imaging processing.

    Rong Liu was born in Hubei Province, China

    in 1986. She received the B.S. degree from

    the Hefei University of Technology (HFUT),

    Hefei in 2009 and the M.S. degree from

    Beijing Jiaotong University (BJTU), Beijing

    in 2011. She is currenly working with the

    State Radio Monitoring Center as an assistant

    engineer. Her research interests include signalprocessing and information theory.